Human rights and climate change

Last updated

On 9 April 2024, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that human rights encompasses a right to effective protection by the State authorities from the serious adverse effects of climate change on lives, health and well-being. Courtroom European Court of Human Rights 05.JPG
On 9 April 2024, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that human rights encompasses a right to effective protection by the State authorities from the serious adverse effects of climate change on lives, health and well-being.

Human rights and climate change is a conceptual and legal framework under which international human rights and their relationship to global warming are studied, analyzed, and addressed. [1] The framework has been employed by governments, United Nations organizations, intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations, human rights and environmental advocates, and academics to guide national and international policy on climate change under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the core international human rights instruments. [2] [3] [4] In 2022 Working Group II of the IPCC suggested that "climate justice comprises justice that links development and human rights to achieve a rights-based approach to addressing climate change". [5]

Contents

Human rights and climate change analysis focuses on the anticipated consequences to humans associated with global environmental phenomena including sea level rise, desertification, temperature increases, extreme weather events, and changes in precipitation, as well as adaptation and mitigation measures taken by governments in response to those phenomena that may involve human rights or related legal protections. Many legal approaches to climate change use the right to a healthy environment, other related rights or other emergent environmental law approaches, such as rights of nature, to advocate for new or required action by governments and private actors, through climate justice advocacy and climate litigation.

On 8 October 2021, the UN Human Rights Council passed a resolution that recognizes a human right to a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment – resolution 48/13. [6] [7]

History

Inuit activist Sheila Watt-Cloutier filed a petition to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights Sheilawatt (cropped).jpg
Inuit activist Sheila Watt-Cloutier filed a petition to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights

In 2005, Inuit activist Sheila Watt-Cloutier filed a petition to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights seeking relief "from human rights violations resulting from the impacts of global warming and climate change caused by acts and omissions of the United States." [8] The petition was rejected, but the Commission invited and heard testimony on the relationship between human rights and climate change from representatives for the Inuit in 2007. [9]

That same year, the Malé Declaration on the Human Dimension of Global Climate Change "stated explicitly (and for the first time in an international agreement) that 'climate change has clear and immediate implications for the full enjoyment of human rights' and called on the United Nations human rights system to address the issue as a matter of urgency." [10] [11]

The following year, the UN Human Rights Council (HRC) unanimously adopted Resolution 7/23, recognizing that "climate change poses an immediate and far-reaching threat to people and communities around the world and has implications for the full enjoyment of human rights," and citing the Charter of the United Nations, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. [12] The HRC reaffirmed and expanded these statements with resolutions 10/4 of 25 March 2009 [13] and 18/22 of 30 September 2011. [14]

In 2009, the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) released an analytical study identifying specific rights and people groups likely to be adversely affected by climate disruptions. [15] The report drew on the submissions of some 30 nations as well as ten United Nations Agencies and dozens of other organizations. [16] The report identified displaced persons, conflict and security risks as well as impaired rights of indigenous peoples, women, and children as major concerns. [17]

In 2010, the Conference of Parties to the UNFCCC reproduced the HRC's language identifying the relationship between human rights and climate change in its report on the 2010 United Nations Climate Change Conference in Cancun, Mexico. [18] The report on the outcome of the Conference emphasized that "Parties should, in all climate change related actions, fully respect human rights." [19]

Recent years have seen an increased recognition of the link between human rights and the environment, yet there are still many questions surrounding the relationship between them. As a result, in 2012 the HRC established a mandate on human rights obligations relating to the enjoyment of a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment. [20] A preliminary report by the appointed Independent Expert, John H. Knox, further stated that there needed to be priority in providing greater conceptual clarity to the application of human rights obligations related to the environment. [21]

In 2014, all 78 of the United Nations Special Procedures Mandate Holders issued a joint statement on Human Rights Day calling for states to incorporate their existing obligations under the human rights framework into climate change negotiations. [22] This would have the effect of bringing the rights of those affected by climate change to the forefront of all response strategies.

As of March 2015, there is now a Special Rapporteur on human rights and the environment, an extension of the mandate of the former Independent Expert on human rights obligations relating to the enjoyment of a right to a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment. [23] Leading up to the 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference in Paris, the Special Rapporteur informed states that they should ensure their human rights obligations encompass the appropriate perspective towards climate change when negotiating future agreements. [24]

The Paris Agreement, as adopted on the 12 December 2015 at the Conference of the Parties, is the most important indication of increasing awareness towards the relationship between climate change and human rights. [25] The Paris Agreement is the first climate agreement to recognise the relevance of human rights, stating: [26]

Parties should, when taking action to address climate change, respect, promote and consider their respective obligations on human rights, the right to health, the rights of indigenous peoples, local communities, migrants, children, persons with disabilities and people in vulnerable situations and the right to development, as well as gender equality, empowerment of women and intergenerational equity.

Human rights law and climate change

Climate change is inducing not only ecological adjustments, but is also impacting the social, economic, political, cultural and legal aspects of societies around the world. The HRC has affirmed that human rights obligations have the ability to strengthen both international and national policy-making in the area of climate change. [13] The 1972 Stockholm Declaration provided the basis for further elaboration of a human right to environmental quality. [27]

Environmental protection is not commonly included in human rights treaties. Rather environmental protection is derived from the rights that those treaties protect, such as the rights to life, food, water and health. [28] Moving forward, human rights law in the context of climate change policy-making may help to establish minimum standards of basic human rights that can be adopted in international and national mitigation and adaption measures. Climate apartheid are the conditions of world affairs, when solely the rich are able to escape the consequences of climate change. [29] [30] As according to Philip Alston, a UN expert, global warming will likely undermine democracy and the rule of law, in addition to basic human rights to life. [30]

In 2021 at its 48th session, the Human Rights Council adopted Resolution 13: The human right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment.

The Oslo Principles on Global Climate Change Obligations for states and enterprises are based, in part, on human rights law. Under the Oslo Principles, both states and enterprises have an obligation to ensure that global warming is limited to 2 degrees Celsius.

Rights implicated

Most international statements on human rights and climate change have emphasized the potential adverse impacts of climate change on the rights to life, food, water, health, housing, development, and self-determination. [31] [32] These rights are enumerated in the core conventions of international human rights law, though not all HRC members or UNFCCC parties are signatories of these conventions.

Right to life

The right to life is protected by Article 6 of the ICCPR where every human being has the inherent right to life. [33] The right to life is inextricably linked to the measure of fulfilment of other rights. There are both projected and observed effects that climate change will have on the right to life. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) fourth assessment report projected an increase in people suffering from death and injury occurring from an increase in floods, storms, heatwaves, fires and droughts. [34] Climate change will equally affect the right to life through an increase in hunger and malnutrition and related disorder impacting child growth and development, respiratory morbidity and ground-level ozone. [34] Rising sea levels is one of the flow-on effects of climate change, resulting from warming water and melting ice sheets. Measuring sea level rise is a complicated affair, however the IPCC have projected an increase in global mean sea level [35] of between 0.44m and 0.74m by 2100. [36] For low-lying coastal islands such as Male', in the Maldives, a sea level rise of 0.5 metres would inundate 15 per cent of the island by 2025, and flood half of it by 2100. [28] As 42 per cent of the population lives within 100m within the coastline, even partial flooding is likely to result in drowning, injury and loss of life.

Observed effects are those where the right to life has already inhibited the right to life. There is difficulty in studying the impacts of climate change itself because of the issue of scale; climate change is measured in decades. [36] There is more than 95 per cent chance that anthropogenic climate change quadrupled the risk of extreme summer heat events in Europe in the decade 1998 to 2008. [37] There is a probability of 75 per cent that the 2003 heat wave in Europe was attributable to climate change. [36] On this basis, the excess mortality rate from this event registered at 15,000 deaths in France alone. [38]

Right to food

This is derived from Article II of the ICESCR where States party to the Covenant have to maximise their available resources to achieve the right to adequate food. [39] Climate change is going to affect all four pillars of food security; availability, access, utilization and stability. A 2008 report by the Special Rapporteur on the right to food has stated that the way the world grows food will have to undergo radical change to cope with a growing population and the effects of climate change, while avoiding environmental collapse. [40] The Paris Agreement recognises the fundamental priority of ensuring food security and the particular vulnerabilities of food production systems to the adverse impacts of climate change. [41] Article 2 calls for adaption to the adverse impacts of climate change and the lowering of greenhouse gas emissions in a manner that will not threaten food production. [41] The IPCC fourth assessment report projects that food production will increase in the mid to high latitudes with a temperature increase of between 1° and 3 °C, however at lower latitudes crop productivity is set to decrease which increases the risk of food insecurity in poorer regions of the world. [36] The United Nations Development Programme estimate an additional 600 million people will face malnutrition due to climate change. [42] This is likely to have a particularly devastating effect on Sub-Saharan Africa. [43]

Right to water

Boy drinks from a tap at a NEWAH WASH water project in Puware Shikhar, Udayapur District, Nepal. Boy drinks from a tap at a NEWAH WASH water project in Puware Shikhar, Udayapur District, Nepal. (10677936093).jpg
Boy drinks from a tap at a NEWAH WASH water project in Puware Shikhar, Udayapur District, Nepal.

The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR) notes that the right to water is not only an essential condition to survival, but also that it is inextricably linked with other rights, such as; housing, attainable standard of health, adequate standard of living, and right to food. [44] The Stern Review states that people will feel the effects of climate change the most strongly through changes in patterns of water distribution around the globe. [45] Those areas that are already experiencing dry conditions will experience a further decrease in water availability, with several (but not all) climate models predicting up to a 30 per cent decrease in annual run-off in the Mediterranean Basin, parts of southern Africa and South America for a 2 °C global temperature rise, and 40 – 50 per cent for 4 °C rise. [1] The IPCC fifth assessment report states that freshwater-related risks increase significantly with increasing greenhouse gas concentrations, with climate change over the 21st century projected to reduce renewable surface water and groundwater resources significantly in most dry subtropical regions. [41]

Right to health

Article 12 of the ICESCR identifies the "right to the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health". [46] Most national constitutions protect the right to health in some manner, and it is widely safeguarded in other international and regional instruments. [47] Climate change is going to amplify health disparities between the rich and poor in different parts of the world. The World Health Organisation (WHO) estimates that since 1970, climate change is responsible for 150,000 deaths every year through increasing incidence in the spread of diarrhoea, malaria and malnutrition predominantly in Africa and other developing regions. [1] Just a 1 °C increase in global temperature from pre-industrial levels could double the annual deaths from climate change (according to WHO). [45]

Right to a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment

This trees provide a serene of beauty and oxygen on our environment Green Ghana 6.jpg
This trees provide a serene of beauty and oxygen on our environment

On 8 October 2021, the UN Human Rights Council passed a resolution that recognizes a human right to a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment – resolution 48/13. [6] [7]

Specific issues

Displacement

Potential climate induced migration is currently one of the most disputed flow-on effects from climate change. Research suggests that climate change may create some 50 to 200 million new internally displaced persons and international refugees by the year 2100. [48] "Mega-deltas" in Asia, Africa, and small islands are at high risk of floods and storms, which will cause large-scale displacement of the local populations. [49] Climate change induced migration will either affect or violate basic international human right norms.

Climate justice

There is significant discussion around the concept of climate justice for the environmental migrant or 'climate refugee'. This concept aims to fill a gap in the legal and political sectors for the millions of people that are not able to receive international legal protection as this source of migration is yet to be included in regional and international law. [50] There is currently no established definition for who can be classified as a climate refugee because it has not yet been enshrined in international law. In 2014 Siego Alesana left the small island developing state of Tuvalu because of the uncertainty surrounding the adverse effects of climate change. [51] Tuvalu is only 4.6m above sea level and faces the imminent danger posed by rising sea levels. Although the impacts of climate change were put forward on behalf of Alesana and his family, the case rested largely on humanitarian grounds. However the Immigration and Protection Tribunal did state that environmental degradation caused by climate change was already a feature of life in Tuvalu. [51] Although this decision wasn't based on impacts of climate change that is not to say that climate change related factors weren't taken into consideration at all. [52] The International Organization for Migration has put forward a working definition of environmental migrant: [53]

Environmental migrants are persons or groups of persons who, predominantly for reasons of sudden or progressive change in the environment that adversely affects their lives or living conditions, are obliged to leave their habitual homes, or choose to do so, either temporarily or permanently, and who move within their country or abroad.

Until there is a legally binding definition of what constitutes an environmental migrant, it will be difficult for any true justice to be served. The concept of climate justice would see all human rights implemented in the most transparent way in order to maintain basic standards in the face of the somewhat unknown impacts that will be created by climate change. [50]

Conflict

International peacebuilding NGO International Alert names 46 countries where climate change effects (including water scarcity, loss of arable land, extreme weather events, shortened growing seasons, and melting glaciers) may interact with economic, social, and political forces to create "a high risk of violent conflict." [54]

Indigenous peoples

Indigenous peoples have a unique position when it comes to discussions on what impact climate change will have on a population. Many indigenous populations live subsistence lifestyles, which in turn are disrupted severely when it comes to the impact of climate change. In many countries, municipal law differs in application to indigenous peoples than the rest of the population, which complicates any legal remedy. [55] Climate change impacts indigenous peoples differently not only because of their physical and spiritual connections to the land and water, but also because they have a specialised ecological and traditional knowledge that can be used to find the best mitigation strategy of those effects. [56]

UN Human Rights organs have identified the rights of indigenous peoples as particularly vulnerable to the disruptive effects of climate change. [57] [58] Due to climate change, the livelihood and cultural identities of indigenous people have been threatened across the world in North America, Europe, Latin America, Africa, and Asia and the Pacific. Approximately 370 million indigenous people are affected. [59]

Children's rights

Child rights programme CHILD-RIGHTS-PROGRAMME.jpg
Child rights programme

Researchers at the Overseas Development Institute identified that children in South Asia may be particularly vulnerable to violations of human rights following climate related disasters. These can include gender-based violence, child labour, family break-ups and barriers to their development and learning. The researchers argue that child rights are rarely prioritised in policies to reduce disaster risk or adapt to climate change and that climate change adaptation policies must tailor interventions to address critical aspects of child rights, particularly child protection and education. [60]

Development

Given that many of the world's poorest citizens depend directly on the environment for all or part of their daily livelihoods, many international development agencies see climate change and development as "inextricably linked." [61] [62] [63]

See also

Related Research Articles

Standard of living is the level of income, comforts and services available, generally applied to a society or location, rather than to an individual. Standard of living is relevant because it is considered to contribute to an individual's quality of life. Standard of living is generally concerned with objective metrics outside an individual's personal control, such as economic, societal, political, legal, and environmental matters – such things that an individual might consider when evaluating where to live in the world, or when assessing the success of economic policy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights</span> Covenant adopted in 1966 by United Nations General Assembly resolution

The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) is a multilateral treaty adopted by the United Nations General Assembly (GA) on 16 December 1966 through GA. Resolution 2200A (XXI), and came into force on 3 January 1976. It commits its parties to work toward the granting of economic, social, and cultural rights (ESCR) to all individuals including those living in Non-Self-Governing and Trust Territories. The rights include labour rights, the right to health, the right to education, and the right to an adequate standard of living. As of February 2024, the Covenant has 172 parties. A further four countries, including the United States, have signed but not ratified the Covenant.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human right to water and sanitation</span> Human right recognized by the United Nations General Assembly in 2010

The human right to water and sanitation (HRWS) is a principle stating that clean drinking water and sanitation are a universal human right because of their high importance in sustaining every person's life. It was recognized as a human right by the United Nations General Assembly on 28 July 2010. The HRWS has been recognized in international law through human rights treaties, declarations and other standards. Some commentators have based an argument for the existence of a universal human right to water on grounds independent of the 2010 General Assembly resolution, such as Article 11.1 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR); among those commentators, those who accept the existence of international ius cogens and consider it to include the Covenant's provisions hold that such a right is a universally binding principle of international law. Other treaties that explicitly recognize the HRWS include the 1979 Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) and the 1989 Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC).

Global commons is a term typically used to describe international, supranational, and global resource domains in which common-pool resources are found. Global commons include the earth's shared natural resources, such as the high oceans, the atmosphere and outer space and the Antarctic in particular. Cyberspace may also meet the definition of a global commons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">David Richard Boyd</span> United Nations special rapporteur

David Richard Boyd is a Canadian environmental lawyer, activist, and diplomat. He is United Nations Special Rapporteur on human rights and the environment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Climate justice</span> Term linking the climate crisis with environmental and social justice

Climate justice is an approach to climate action that focuses on the unequal impacts of climate change on marginalized or otherwise vulnerable populations. Climate justice wants to achieve an equitable distribution of both the burdens of climate change and the efforts to mitigate climate change. Climate justice is a type of environmental justice.

The Universal Periodic Review (UPR) is a state monitoring mechanism of the United Nations Human Rights Council (HRC). It was established by General Assembly resolution 60/251 in 2006 to periodically review the protection and promotion of human rights in each of the 193 United Nations (UN) Member States. New Zealand has been reviewed twice via the UPR in 2009 and 2014.

Free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) is aimed to establish bottom-up participation and consultation of an indigenous population prior to the beginning of development on ancestral land or using resources in an indigenous population's territory. Indigenous people have a special connection to their land and resources and inhabit one fifth of the Earth's surface. Such areas are environmentally rich in both renewable and non-renewable resources. The collective ownership style of most Indigenous Peoples conflicts with the modern global market and its continuous need for resources and land. To protect Indigenous Peoples' rights, international human rights law has created processes and standards to safeguard their way of life and to encourage participation in the decision-making process. One such method is the process of FPIC. There is criticism that many international conventions and treaties require consultation, not consent, which is a much higher threshold. Without the requirement for consent, indigenous people cannot veto government projects and developments in their area that directly affect their lives and cultures. FPIC allows Indigenous Peoples to have the right to self-determination and self-governance in national and local government decision-making processes over projects that concern their lives and resources.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human rights and development</span>

Development is a human right that belongs to everyone, individually and collectively. Everyone is “entitled to participate in, contribute to, and enjoy economic, social, cultural and political development, in which all human rights and fundamental freedoms can be fully realized,” states the groundbreaking UN Declaration on the Right to Development, proclaimed in 1986.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rights of nature</span> Legal theory

Rights of nature or Earth rights is a legal and jurisprudential theory that describes inherent rights as associated with ecosystems and species, similar to the concept of fundamental human rights. The rights of nature concept challenges twentieth-century laws as generally grounded in a flawed frame of nature as "resource" to be owned, used, and degraded. Proponents argue that laws grounded in rights of nature direct humanity to act appropriately and in a way consistent with modern, system-based science, which demonstrates that humans and the natural world are fundamentally interconnected.

The proposed Convention on the Rights of Older Persons (UNCROP) is likely to be the next major human rights treaty adopted by the United Nations. The proposed treaty will seek to remedy the fragmented human rights structure for Older Persons, and will focus on reaffirming critical human rights which are of concern to older persons. The focus of the treaty will be persons over 60 years of age, which is a growing demographic worldwide due to increased population ageing. The treaty follows from the success of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child which has seen near universal acceptance since 1989. Where the UNCRC focuses on the rights of younger persons, the UNCROP will address those who form the older portion of society, who according to United Nations reports, are becoming increasingly vulnerable as a group without applicable normative standards of human rights law. Support for a Convention is becoming increasingly popular, as human rights groups including the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR), HelpAge International, the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, the International Labour Organization, and many other NGOs and states have expressed support for a universal instrument. A raising number of NGOs from across the world have joined forces in advocating for a Convention in the Global Alliance for the Rights of Older Persons (GAROP) which has been set up out of the need to strengthen the rights of older persons worldwide. With population ageing, the human rights of the growing number of older persons have become an increasingly important issue. Among the human rights issues faced by older persons are ageist attitudes leading to discrimination, exclusion and constraints on the legal capacity, autonomy and independent living of older people. Existing human rights violations have been further exacerbated and put on the spotlight by the COVID-19 pandemic. Older people have been denied access to health services and became prone to physical and social isolation. The stigmatisation of older people and ageist images of older persons have also become more evident. The debate surrounding the convention focuses on the implementation and safeguarding of older persons’ human rights aiming to set normative standards of human rights for older persons in an international legally binding instrument. An underlying common factor and root cause of many of human rights violations experienced by older persons, along with its ubiquitous, prevalent, and surreptitious nature, is ageism. Ageism, as defined by the World Health Organization, refers to the stereotypes, prejudice and discrimination towards others or oneself based on age. A UNCROP would go a long way to tackle ageism. Individual relationships generally fall outside of current human rights law, which seeks to present standards of relations between states and individuals. Therefore, it has been suggested that the proposed human rights convention for older persons ought to be drafted as an anti-discrimination convention. However, this would not be consistent with other multilateral human rights conventions such as the ICCPR and ICESCR which set normative standards.

The Declaration on the Rights of Peasants is an UNGA resolution on human rights with "universal understanding", adopted by the United Nations in 2018. The resolution was passed by a vote of 121-8, with 54 members abstaining.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marcia V. J. Kran</span> Canadian lawyer

Marcia Vaune Jocelyn Kran is a Canadian lawyer and expert member of the UN Human Rights Committee. Kran's career has spanned international human rights law, criminal law and political science for over forty years, and includes positions in academia and civil society. Kran has held a range of senior United Nations positions including in international human rights law.

Mihir Kanade is an author and professor of international law, human rights and development at the University for Peace (UPEACE), a university founded by the United Nations. He holds the concurrent positions of the Academic Coordinator of UPEACE since 2016, the Head of its Department of International Law since 2014, and the Director of the UPEACE Human Rights Centre since 2009.

The Global Pact for the Environment project was launched in 2017 by a network of experts known as the "International Group of Experts for the Pact" (IGEP). The group is made up of more than a hundred legal experts in environmental law and is chaired by former COP21 President Laurent Fabius.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Right to a healthy environment</span> Human right proposed by environmental groups

The right to a healthy environment or the right to a sustainable and healthy environment is a human right advocated by human rights organizations and environmental organizations to protect the ecological systems that provide human health. The right was acknowledged by the United Nations Human Rights Council during its 48th session in October 2021 in HRC/RES/48/13 and subsequently by the United Nations General Assembly on July 28, 2022 in A/RES/76/300. The right is often the basis for human rights defense by environmental defenders, such as land defenders, water protectors and indigenous rights activists.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Disability and climate change</span>

The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), the Paris Agreement, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) are connected through their common goals of addressing global challenges and promoting sustainable development through policies and international cooperation.

Environmental defenders or environmental human rights defenders are individuals or collectives who protect the environment from harms resulting from resource extraction, hazardous waste disposal, infrastructure projects, land appropriation, or other dangers. In 2019, the UN Human Rights Council unanimously recognised their importance to environmental protection. The term environmental defender is broadly applied to a diverse range of environmental groups and leaders from different cultures that all employ different tactics and hold different agendas. Use of the term is contested, as it homogenizes such a wide range of groups and campaigns, many of whom do not self-identify with the term and may not have explicit aims to protect the environment.

The human right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment is a resolution by the United Nations General Assembly and before that the United Nations Human Rights Council, that recognizes a healthy environment as a human right. It was adopted at the 48th session of the HRC, marking the first time that the HRC recognized a human right in a resolution. The draft resolution was put forward by the core group comprising Costa Rica (Penholder), Morocco, Slovenia, Switzerland and the Maldives. The vote passed with 43 votes in favor, 0 votes against, and 4 abstentions.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Stephen Humphreys, ed. (2010). Human rights and climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN   978-0-511-76998-6. OCLC   652432164.
  2. "New UN Report Details Link between Climate Change and Human Rights". UN Environment. 2017-10-05. Retrieved 2022-03-20.
  3. "Report of the Human Rights Council on its thirty-first session. Advance unedited version". Human Rights Council. 2016-07-22. Retrieved 2022-08-17.
  4. Rajamani, Lavanya (2019-06-26). "Integrating Human Rights in the Paris Climate Architecture: Contest, Context, and Consequence". Climate Law. 9 (3): 180–201. doi:10.1163/18786561-00903003. ISSN   1878-6553. S2CID   199289341.
  5. "AR6 Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability — IPCC" . Retrieved 2022-03-20.
  6. 1 2 "The right to a clean and healthy environment: 6 things you need to know". UN News. 15 October 2021. Retrieved 3 November 2021.
  7. 1 2 "a/hrc/48/l.23/rev.1". undocs.org. Retrieved 9 November 2021.
  8. "Petition to the Inter American Commission on Human Rights Seeking Relief from Violations Resulting from Global Warming Caused by Acts and Omissions of the United States" (PDF). Inuit Circumpolar Council. 7 December 2005. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 June 2013. Retrieved 25 April 2012.
  9. Sieg, Richard (2 March 2007). "At International Commission, Inuit Want to See Change in U.S. Policy on Global Warming". Archived from the original on 1 July 2010. Retrieved 25 April 2012.
  10. Limon, Marc (2009). "HUMAN RIGHTS AND CLIMATE CHANGE: CONSTRUCTING A CASE FOR POLITICAL ACTION" (PDF). Harvard Environmental Law Review. 33 (2): 439–476. Retrieved 25 April 2012.
  11. "Malé Declaration on the Human Dimension of Global Climate Change" (PDF). Center for International Environmental Law. 14 November 2007.
  12. "UNHRC Resolution 7/23, Human rights and climate change" (PDF). Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. 28 March 2008.
  13. 1 2 "UNHRC Resolution 10/4, Human rights and climate change" (PDF). Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. 25 March 2009.
  14. "A/HRC/RES/18/22 Human rights and climate change". United Nations. 30 September 2011.[ permanent dead link ]
  15. "Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on the relationship between climate change and human rights" (PDF). United Nations. 15 January 2009. A/HRC/10/61. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 12, 2011. Retrieved 25 April 2012.
  16. "OHCHR study on the relationship between climate change and human rights: Submissions and reference documents received" . Retrieved 25 April 2012.
  17. See "Report" (PDF). United Nations. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 12, 2011. Retrieved 2012-04-25., n.8, at 15-22.
  18. "Addendum, Part Two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its sixteenth session". Report of the Conference of the Parties on its sixteenth session, held in Cancun from 29 November to 10 December 2010 (PDF). UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (Report). 15 March 2011.
  19. "Decision 1/CP.16, the Cancun Agreements: Outcome of the Work of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action Under the Convention". Report of the Conference of the Parties on its sixteenth session, held in Cancun from 29 November to 10 December 2010 (PDF). UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (Report). 15 March 2011.
  20. "UNHRC Resolution 19/10, Human rights and the environment" (PDF). United Nations. 19 April 2012.
  21. Report of the Independent Expert on the issue of human rights obligations relating to the enjoyment of a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment (PDF). United Nations (Report). 24 December 2012. A/HRC/22/43.
  22. "Statement of the United Nations Special Procedures Mandate Holders on the occasion of the Human Rights Day Geneva, 10 December 2014". Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. Retrieved 2017-09-05.
  23. "UNHRC Resolution 28/11, Human rights and the environment" (PDF). United Nations. 7 April 2015.
  24. "COP21: "States' human rights obligations encompass climate change" – UN expert". Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. Retrieved 2017-09-05.
  25. John H Knox (1 February 2016). "Report of the Special Rapporteur on the issue of human rights obligations relating to the enjoyment of a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment". SSRN   2729611.
  26. "Adoption of the Paris Agreement" (PDF). UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. 12 December 2015. FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1.
  27. Birnie, Patricia W. (2009). International law and the environment. Boyle, Alan E., Redgwell, Catherine. (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN   9780198764229. OCLC   271647969.
  28. 1 2 McInerney-Lankford, Siobhán Alice; Darrow, Mac; Rajamani, Lavanya (2011). Human rights and climate change: a review of the international legal dimensions. Washington, DC: World Bank. ISBN   9780821387207. OCLC   724352139.
  29. "'Climate apartheid': UN expert says human rights may not survive". the Guardian. 25 June 2019. Retrieved 28 August 2022.
  30. 1 2 "World faces 'climate apartheid' risk, 120 more million in poverty: UN expert". UN News. 25 June 2019. Retrieved 28 August 2022.
  31. See Malé Declaration, n.4; UNHRC Resolution 18/22, n.7; A/HRC/10/61, n.8; FCCC/CP/2010/7/Add.1, n.10.
  32. "Human rights, climate change and cross-border displacement". Universal Rights Group. Retrieved 2016-02-10.
  33. "International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights" (PDF). Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. 23 March 1976.
  34. 1 2 "Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on the relationship between climate change and human rights" (PDF). Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. 15 January 2009. A/HRC/10/61.
  35. "What is the definition of global mean sea level (GMSL) and its rate?". CU Sea Level Research Group. University of Colorado. Archived from the original on 2017-12-11. Retrieved 2017-10-15.
  36. 1 2 3 4 Rajendra K. Pachauri; Andy Reisinger; et al., eds. (2007). Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (PDF). Geneva: IPCC. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-01-17.
  37. Christidis, Nikolaos; Stott, Peter A.; Jones, Gareth S.; Shiogama, Hideo; Nozawa, Toru; Luterbacher, Jürg (2012-02-01). "Human activity and anomalously warm seasons in Europe". International Journal of Climatology. 32 (2): 225–239. Bibcode:2012IJCli..32..225C. doi: 10.1002/joc.2262 . ISSN   1097-0088. S2CID   129931524.
  38. Fouillet, A.; Rey, G.; Laurent, F.; Pavillon, G.; Bellec, S.; Guihenneuc-Jouyaux, C.; Clavel, J.; Jougla, E.; Hémon, Denis (2006). "Excess mortality related to the August 2003 heat wave in France". International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health. 80 (1): 16–24. Bibcode:2006IAOEH..80...16F. doi:10.1007/s00420-006-0089-4. ISSN   0340-0131. PMC   1950160 . PMID   16523319.
  39. "International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights". OHCHR. 1966.: article 2(1), 11(1) and 23.
  40. De Schutter, Olivier (8 September 2008). "Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right to food; Building resilience: a human rights framework for world food and nutrition security" (PDF). Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. A/HRC/9/23.
  41. 1 2 3 R.K. Pachauri; L.A. Meyer, eds. (2014). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (PDF).
  42. "Fighting climate change: Human solidarity in a divided world" (PDF). Human Development Report: 8. 2007. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2021-05-13. Retrieved 2017-09-06.
  43. M.L. Parry; O.F. Canziani; J.P. Palutikof; P.J. van der Linden; C.E. Hanson, eds. (2007). Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (PDF). Cambridge University Press. p. 275.
  44. "General Comment No. 15: The Right to Water (Arts. 11 and 12 of the Covenant)" (PDF). Refworld. 20 January 2003. E/C.12/2002/11.
  45. 1 2 "The Stern Review on the Economic Effects of Climate Change". Population and Development Review. 32 (4): 793–798. 2006-12-01. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2006.00153.x . ISSN   1728-4457.
  46. "International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights". OHCHR. 1966.
  47. McInerney-Lankford, Siobhan; Darrow, Mac; Rajamani, Lavanya (2011). Human Rights and Climate Change: A Review of the International Legal Dimensions. World Bank Publications. ISBN   9780821387207.
  48. Docherty, Bonnie; Tyler Giannini (2009). "Confronting a Rising Tide: A Proposal for a Convention on Climage Change Refugees" (PDF). Harvard Environmental Law Review. 33: 349–403. Retrieved 25 April 2012.
  49. "Displacement Caused by the Effects of Climate Change: Who Will Be Affected and What Are the Gaps in the Normative Framework for Their Protection? | Brookings Institution". Brookings. 2017-02-16. Retrieved 2017-02-16.
  50. 1 2 Manou, Dimitra; Baldwin, Andrew; Cubie, Dug; Mihr, Anja; Thorp, Teresa M. (2017-05-12). Climate change, migration and human rights law and policy perspectives. London. ISBN   9781317222330. OCLC   987699915.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  51. 1 2 "AD (Tuvalu )". New Zealand Legal Information Institute. 4 June 2014. 501370. Retrieved 2017-10-15.
  52. ""Climate refugees" revisited: a closer look at the Tuvalu decision". Vernon Rive. Archived from the original on 2017-10-04. Retrieved 2017-10-15.
  53. "Definitional Issues". International Organization for Migration. 2015-01-29. Retrieved 2017-09-09.
  54. Smith, Dan; Janani Vivekananda (November 2007). "A Climate of Conflict: The links between climate change, peace and war" (PDF). International Alert.
  55. Abate, Randall; Warner, Elizabeth Ann Kronk, eds. (2013). Climate change and Indigenous peoples: the search for legal remedies. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. ISBN   9781783474172. OCLC   811732784.
  56. Gerrard, Emily (2008). "Climate change and human rights: issues and opportunities for Indigenous peoples". University of New South Wales Law Journal. 31.
  57. "Climate change and indigenous peoples". www.ohchr.org. Retrieved 2021-01-12.
  58. Hampson, Françoise (13 July 2004). "The Human Rights Situation of Indigenous Peoples in States and Territories Threatened With Extinction for Environmental Reason" (PDF). Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. E/CN.4/Sub.2/AC.4/2004/CRP.1.
  59. Williams, Jay (2012-05-01). "The impact of climate change on indigenous people – the implications for the cultural, spiritual, economic and legal rights of indigenous people". The International Journal of Human Rights. 16 (4): 648–688. doi:10.1080/13642987.2011.632135. ISSN   1364-2987. S2CID   145663936.
  60. "Climate extremes and child rights in South Asia: a neglected priority" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-11-06. Retrieved 2021-01-12.
  61. "Integrating Climate Change into Development" (PDF). U.S. Agency for International Development. November 2008. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-06-30.
  62. Development and Climate Change: A Strategic Framework for the World Bank Group (PDF). The World Bank (Report). 2008.
  63. Khoday, Kishan (7 May 2007). "Climate Change and the Right to Development. Himalayan Glacial Melting and the Future of Development on the Tibetan Plateau" (PDF). Human Development Report Office Occasional Paper. Retrieved 26 April 2012.