Sentinel lymph node

Last updated
Image illustrating sentinel lymph nodes. The axillary lymph nodes drain 75% of the lymph from the breasts((uncited)) and so may be the first lymph nodes affected in breast cancer. Swollen Lymph Nodes.jpg
Image illustrating sentinel lymph nodes. The axillary lymph nodes drain 75% of the lymph from the breasts((uncited)) and so may be the first lymph nodes affected in breast cancer.

The sentinel lymph node is the hypothetical first lymph node or group of nodes draining a cancer. In case of established cancerous dissemination it is postulated that the sentinel lymph nodes are the target organs primarily reached by metastasizing cancer cells from the tumor.

Contents

The sentinel node procedure (also termed sentinel lymph node biopsy or SLNB) is the identification, removal and analysis of the sentinel lymph nodes of a particular tumour. [1]

Physiology

The spread of some forms of cancer usually follows an orderly progression, spreading first to regional lymph nodes, then the next echelon of lymph nodes, and so on, since the flow of lymph is directional, meaning that some cancers spread in a predictable fashion from where the cancer started. In these cases, if the cancer spreads it will spread first to lymph nodes (lymph glands) close to the tumor before it spreads to other parts of the body. The concept of sentinel lymph node surgery is to determine if the cancer has spread to the very first draining lymph node (called the "sentinel lymph node") or not. If the sentinel lymph node does not contain cancer, then there is a high likelihood that the cancer has not spread to any other area of the body. [2]

Uses

The concept of the sentinel lymph node is important because of the advent of the sentinel lymph node biopsy technique, also known as a sentinel node procedure. This technique is used in the staging of certain types of cancer to see if they have spread to any lymph nodes, since lymph node metastasis is one of the most important prognostic signs. It can also guide the surgeon to the appropriate therapy. [3]

A blue stained sentinel lymph node in the axilla. Sentinel lymph node (axilla).jpg
A blue stained sentinel lymph node in the axilla.
A micrograph showing an adenocarcinoma of the breast (dark pink) in a lymph node (purple) and extending into the surrounding fat (white, chicken-wire appearance). H&E stain. Breast carcinoma in a lymph node.jpg
A micrograph showing an adenocarcinoma of the breast (dark pink) in a lymph node (purple) and extending into the surrounding fat (white, chicken-wire appearance). H&E stain.

There are various procedures entailing the sentinel node detection:

In everyday clinical activity, entailing sentinel node detection and sentinel lymph node biopsy, it is not required to include all different techniques listed above. In skilled hands and in a center with sound routines, one, two or three of the listed methods can be considered sufficient.

To perform a sentinel lymph node biopsy, the physician performs a lymphoscintigraphy, wherein a low-activity radioactive substance is injected near the tumor. The injected substance, filtered sulfur colloid, is tagged with the radionuclide technetium-99m. The injection protocols differ by doctor but the most common is a 500 μCi dose divided among 5 tuberculin syringes with 1/2 inch, 24 gauge needles.[ citation needed ] In the UK 20 megabecquerels of nanocolloid is recommended. [8] The sulphur colloid is slightly acidic and causes minor stinging. A gentle massage of the injection sites spreads the sulphur colloid, relieving the pain and speeding up the lymph uptake. Scintigraphic imaging is usually started within 5 minutes of injection and the node appears from 5 min to 1 hour. This is usually done several hours before the actual biopsy. About 15 minutes before the biopsy the physician injects a blue dye in the same manner. Then, during the biopsy, the physician visually inspects the lymph nodes for staining and uses a gamma probe or a Geiger counter to assess which lymph nodes have taken up the radionuclide. One or several nodes may take up the dye and radioactive tracer, and these nodes are designated the sentinel lymph nodes. The surgeon then removes these lymph nodes and sends them to a pathologist for rapid examination under a microscope to look for the presence of cancer.

A frozen section procedure is commonly employed (which takes less than 20 minutes), so if neoplasia is detected in the lymph node a further lymph node dissection may be performed. With malignant melanoma, many pathologists eschew frozen sections for more accurate "permanent" specimen preparation due to the increased instances of false-negative with melanocytic staining.

Clinical advantages

There are various advantages to the sentinel node procedure. First and foremost, it decreases lymph node dissections where unnecessary, thereby reducing the risk of lymphedema, a common complication of this procedure. Increased attention on the node(s) identified to most likely contain metastasis is also more likely to detect micrometastasis and result in staging and treatment changes. Its main uses are in breast cancer and malignant melanoma surgery, although it has been used in other tumor types (colon cancer) with a degree of success. [9] Other cancers which have been investigated with this technique are penile cancer, urinary bladder cancer, [10] [11] prostate cancer, [12] [13] [14] testicular cancer [15] [16] and renal cell cancer. [17] [18]

Research advantages

As a bridge to translational medicine, various aspects of cancer dissemination can be studied using sentinel node detection and ensuing sentinel node biopsy. Tumor biology pertaining to metastatic capacity, [19] mechanisms of dissemination, the EMT-MET-process (epithelial–mesenchymal transition) and cancer immunology [20] are some subjects which can be more distinctly investigated.

Disadvantages

However, the technique is not without drawbacks, particularly when used for melanoma patients. This technique only has therapeutic value in patients with positive nodes. [21] Failure to detect cancer cells in the sentinel node can lead to a false negative result—there may still be cancerous cells in the lymph node basin. In addition, there is no compelling evidence that patients who have a full lymph node dissection as a result of a positive sentinel lymph node result have improved survival compared to those who do not have a full dissection until later in their disease, when the lymph nodes can be felt by a physician. Such patients may be having an unnecessary full dissection, with the attendant risk of lymphedema. [22]

History

The concept of a sentinel node was first described by Gould et al. 1960 in a patient with cancer of the parotid gland [23] and was implemented clinically on a broad scale by Cabanas in penile cancer. [24] The technique of sentinel node radiolocalization was co-founded by James C. Alex, MD, FACS and David N. Krag MD (University of Vermont Medical Center) and they were the first ones to pioneer this method for the use of cutaneous melanoma, breast cancer, head and neck cancer and Merkel cell carcinoma. Confirmative trials followed soon after. [25] Studies were also conducted at the Moffitt Cancer Center with Charles Cox, MD, Cristina Wofter, MD, Douglas Reintgen, MD and James Norman, MD. Following validation of the sentinel node biopsy technique, a number of randomised controlled trials were initiated to establish whether the technique could safely be used to avoid unnecessary axillary dissection among women with early breast cancer. The first such trial, led by Umberto Veronesi at the European Institute of Oncology, showed that women with breast tumours of 2 cm or less could safely forgo axillary dissection if their sentinel lymph nodes were found to be cancer-free on biopsy. [26] The benefits included less pain, greater arm mobility and less swelling in the arm. [27]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Metastasis</span> Spread of a disease inside a body

Metastasis is a pathogenic agent's spread from an initial or primary site to a different or secondary site within the host's body; the term is typically used when referring to metastasis by a cancerous tumor. The newly pathological sites, then, are metastases (mets). It is generally distinguished from cancer invasion, which is the direct extension and penetration by cancer cells into neighboring tissues.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bladder cancer</span> Urinary system cancer that begins in the urinary bladder

Bladder cancer is any of several types of cancer arising from the tissues of the urinary bladder. Symptoms include blood in the urine, pain with urination, and low back pain. It is caused when epithelial cells that line the bladder become malignant.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Melanoma</span> Cancer originating in melanocytes

Melanoma, also redundantly known as malignant melanoma, is a type of cancer that develops from the pigment-producing cells known as melanocytes. Melanomas typically occur in the skin, but may rarely occur in the mouth, intestines, or eye. In women, they most commonly occur on the legs, while in men, they most commonly occur on the back. About 25% of melanomas develop from moles. Changes in a mole that can indicate melanoma include an increase in size, irregular edges, change in color, itchiness, or skin breakdown.

Cancer staging is the process of determining the extent to which a cancer has grown and spread. A number from I to IV is assigned, with I being an isolated cancer and IV being a cancer that has metastasized and spread from its origin. The stage generally takes into account the size of a tumor, whether it has invaded adjacent organs, how many regional (nearby) lymph nodes it has spread to, and whether it has appeared in more distant locations (metastasized).

This is a list of terms related to oncology. The original source for this list was the US National Cancer Institute's public domain Dictionary of Cancer Terms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lymphadenectomy</span> Medical procedure

Lymphadenectomy, or lymph node dissection, is the surgical removal of one or more groups of lymph nodes. It is almost always performed as part of the surgical management of cancer. In a regional lymph node dissection, some of the lymph nodes in the tumor area are removed; in a radical lymph node dissection, most or all of the lymph nodes in the tumor area are removed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lumpectomy</span> Limited surgical removal of breast tissue

Lumpectomy is a surgical removal of a discrete portion or "lump" of breast tissue, usually in the treatment of a malignant tumor or breast cancer. It is considered a viable breast conservation therapy, as the amount of tissue removed is limited compared to a full-breast mastectomy, and thus may have physical and emotional advantages over more disfiguring treatment. Sometimes a lumpectomy may be used to either confirm or rule out that cancer has actually been detected. A lumpectomy is usually recommended to patients whose cancer has been detected early and who do not have enlarged tumors. Although a lumpectomy is used to allow for most of the breast to remain intact, the procedure may result in adverse affects that can include sensitivity and result in scar tissue, pain, and possible disfiguration of the breast if the lump taken out is significant. According to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, lumpectomy may be performed for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), invasive ductal carcinoma, or other conditions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Invasive carcinoma of no special type</span> Medical condition

Invasive carcinoma of no special type (NST) is also referred to as invasive ductal carcinoma or infiltrating ductal carcinoma(IDC) and invasive ductal carcinoma, not otherwise specified (NOS). Each of these terms represents to the same disease entity, but for international audiences this article will use invasive carcinoma NST because it is the preferred term of the World Health Organization (WHO).

A micrometastasis is a small collection of cancer cells that has been shed from the original tumor and spread to another part of the body through the lymphovascular system. Micrometastases are too few, in size and quantity, to be picked up in a screening or diagnostic test, and therefore cannot be seen with imaging tests such as a mammogram, MRI, ultrasound, PET, or CT scans. These migrant cancer cells may group together to form a second tumor, which is so small that it can only be seen under a microscope. Approximately ninety percent of people who die from cancer die from metastatic disease, since these cells are so challenging to detect. It is important for these cancer cells to be treated immediately after discovery, in order to prevent the relapse and the likely death of the patient.

Breast cancer management takes different approaches depending on physical and biological characteristics of the disease, as well as the age, over-all health and personal preferences of the patient. Treatment types can be classified into local therapy and systemic treatment. Local therapy is most efficacious in early stage breast cancer, while systemic therapy is generally justified in advanced and metastatic disease, or in diseases with specific phenotypes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Breast-conserving surgery</span> Surgical operation

Breast-conserving surgery refers to an operation that aims to remove breast cancer while avoiding a mastectomy. Different forms of this operation include: lumpectomy (tylectomy), wide local excision, segmental resection, and quadrantectomy. Breast-conserving surgery has been increasingly accepted as an alternative to mastectomy in specific patients, as it provides tumor removal while maintaining an acceptable cosmetic outcome. This page reviews the history of this operation, important considerations in decision making and patient selection, and the emerging field of oncoplastic breast conservation surgery.

Uschi Keszler's Pennies in Action Cancer Research Fund, holding a full 501(c)(3) non-profit foundation status, exists to support research for breast cancer curative programs, including preventative vaccines and other biological therapies that do not damage the immune system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Male breast cancer</span> Medical condition

Male breast cancer (MBC) is a cancer in males that originates in their breasts. Males account for less than 1% of new breast cancers with about 20,000 new cases being diagnosed worldwide every year. Its incidence rates in males vs. females are, respectively, 0.4 and 66.7 per 100,000 person-years. The worldwide incidences of male as well as female breast cancers have been increasing over the last few decades. Currently, one of every 800 men are estimated to develop this cancer during their lifetimes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Indocyanine green</span> Chemical compound

Indocyanine green (ICG) is a cyanine dye used in medical diagnostics. It is used for determining cardiac output, hepatic function, liver and gastric blood flow, and for ophthalmic and cerebral angiography. It has a peak spectral absorption at about 800 nm. These infrared frequencies penetrate retinal layers, allowing ICG angiography to image deeper patterns of circulation than fluorescein angiography. ICG binds tightly to plasma proteins and becomes confined to the vascular system. ICG has a half-life of 150 to 180 seconds and is removed from circulation exclusively by the liver to bile.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gamma probe</span>

A gamma probe is a handheld device containing a scintillation counter, for intraoperative use following injection of a radionuclide, to locate sentinel lymph nodes by their radioactivity. It is used primarily for sentinel lymph node mapping and parathyroid surgery. Gamma probes are also used for RSL, to locate small and non-palpable breast lesions.

Souzan El-Eid is a breast surgical oncologist at Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada (CCCN), and serves as the medical director of the Breast Care Center at Summerlin Hospital, cancer liaison physician for the cancer program and co-chair of the Breast Tumor Board at Summerlin Hospital. She is also the president elect for Clark County Medical Society. She is an Adjunct Associate Professor of General Surgery at Touro University Nevada and has served as principal investigator for several clinical research studies. She is the first breast surgeon in Las Vegas certified in both ultrasound and stereotactic breast biopsies.

Prognostic markers are biomarkers used to measure the progress of a disease in the patient sample. Prognostic markers are useful to stratify the patients into groups, guiding towards precise medicine discovery. The widely used prognostic markers in cancers include stage, size, grade, node and metastasis. In addition to these common markers, there are prognostic markers specific to different cancer types. For example estrogen level, progesterone and HER2 are markers specific to breast cancer patients. There is evidence showing that genes behaving as tumor suppressors or carcinogens could act as prognostic markers due to altered gene expression or mutation. Besides genetic biomarkers, there are also biomarkers that are detected in plasma or body fluid which can be metabolic or protein biomarkers.

Anne Louise Rosenberg is an American surgical oncologist retired from practice in Cherry Hill, New Jersey.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Armando E. Giuliano</span> American surgical oncologist

Armando Elario Giuliano is a surgical oncologist, surgeon scientist and medical professor in Los Angeles, California, United States of America. He is the Linda and Jim Lippman Chair in Surgical Oncology and co-director of Saul and Joyce Brandman Breast Center at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles.

CP-GEP is a non-invasive prediction model for cutaneous melanoma patients that combines clinicopathologic (CP) variables with gene expression profiling (GEP). CP-GEP is able to identify cutaneous melanoma patients at low-risk for nodal metastasis who may forgo the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) procedure. The CP-GEP model was developed by the Mayo Clinic and SkylineDx BV, and it has been clinically validated in multiple studies.

References

  1. Storino A, Drews RE, Tawa NE (June 2021). "Malignant Cutaneous Adnexal Tumors and Role of SLNB". Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 232 (6): 889–898. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2021.01.019. PMID   33727135. S2CID   242176779.
  2. Wang XJ, Fang F, Li YF (January 2015). "Sentinel-lymph-node procedures in early stage cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis". Medical Oncology. 32 (1): 385. doi:10.1007/s12032-014-0385-x. PMC   4246132 . PMID   25429838.
  3. Kumar V, Abbas AK, Fausto N, Aster JC, eds. (2009). Robbins & Cotran Pathologic Basis of Disease (8th ed.). Elsevier Health Sciences. p. 270. ISBN   978-1-4377-2015-0.
  4. Sherif A, Garske U, de la Torre M, Thörn M (July 2006). "Hybrid SPECT-CT: an additional technique for sentinel node detection of patients with invasive bladder cancer". European Urology. 50 (1): 83–91. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2006.03.002. PMID   16632191.
  5. Leijte JA, Valdés Olmos RA, Nieweg OE, Horenblas S (October 2008). "Anatomical mapping of lymphatic drainage in penile carcinoma with SPECT-CT: implications for the extent of inguinal lymph node dissection". European Urology. 54 (4): 885–90. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2008.04.094. PMID   18502024.
  6. Karakatsanis A, Christiansen PM, Fischer L, Hedin C, Pistioli L, Sund M, Rasmussen NR, Jørnsgård H, Tegnelius D, Eriksson S, Daskalakis K, Wärnberg F, Markopoulos CJ, Bergkvist L (June 2016). "The Nordic SentiMag trial: a comparison of super paramagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) nanoparticles versus Tc(99) and patent blue in the detection of sentinel node (SN) in patients with breast cancer and a meta-analysis of earlier studies". Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 157 (2): 281–294. doi:10.1007/s10549-016-3809-9. PMC   4875068 . PMID   27117158.
  7. "Sentimag". Endomag. Retrieved 2019-03-09.
  8. BNMS (August 2011). "Lymphoscintigraphy Clinical Guidelines" (PDF). Retrieved 3 January 2017.
  9. Tanis PJ, Boom RP, Koops HS, Faneyte IF, Peterse JL, Nieweg OE, Rutgers EJ, Tiebosch AT, Kroon BB (April 2001). "Frozen section investigation of the sentinel node in malignant melanoma and breast cancer". Annals of Surgical Oncology. 8 (3): 222–6. doi:10.1245/aso.2001.8.3.222. PMID   11314938.
  10. Sherif A, De La Torre M, Malmström PU, Thörn M (September 2001). "Lymphatic mapping and detection of sentinel nodes in patients with bladder cancer". The Journal of Urology. 166 (3): 812–5. doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(05)65842-9. PMID   11490224.
  11. Liedberg F, Chebil G, Davidsson T, Gudjonsson S, Månsson W (January 2006). "Intraoperative sentinel node detection improves nodal staging in invasive bladder cancer". The Journal of Urology. 175 (1): 84–8, discussion 88–9. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00066-2. PMID   16406877. S2CID   32329157.
  12. Wawroschek F, Vogt H, Weckermann D, Wagner T, Harzmann R (December 1999). "The sentinel lymph node concept in prostate cancer - first results of gamma probe-guided sentinel lymph node identification". European Urology. 36 (6): 595–600. doi:10.1159/000020054. PMID   10559614. S2CID   46760854.
  13. Ganswindt U, Paulsen F, Corvin S, Eichhorn K, Glocker S, Hundt I, Birkner M, Alber M, Anastasiadis A, Stenzl A, Bares R, Budach W, Bamberg M, Belka C (July 2005). "Intensity modulated radiotherapy for high risk prostate cancer based on sentinel node SPECT imaging for target volume definition". BMC Cancer. 5: 91. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-5-91. PMC   1190164 . PMID   16048656.
  14. Jeschke S, Nambirajan T, Leeb K, Ziegerhofer J, Sega W, Janetschek G (June 2005). "Detection of early lymph node metastases in prostate cancer by laparoscopic radioisotope guided sentinel lymph node dissection". The Journal of Urology. 173 (6): 1943–6. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000158159.16314.eb. PMID   15879787.
  15. Ohyama C, Chiba Y, Yamazaki T, Endoh M, Hoshi S, Arai Y (October 2002). "Lymphatic mapping and gamma probe guided laparoscopic biopsy of sentinel lymph node in patients with clinical stage I testicular tumor". The Journal of Urology. 168 (4 Pt 1): 1390–5. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64456-4. PMID   12352400.
  16. Brouwer OR, Valdés Olmos RA, Vermeeren L, Hoefnagel CA, Nieweg OE, Horenblas S (April 2011). "SPECT/CT and a portable gamma-camera for image-guided laparoscopic sentinel node biopsy in testicular cancer". Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 52 (4): 551–4. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.086660 . PMID   21421720.
  17. Bex A, Vermeeren L, de Windt G, Prevoo W, Horenblas S, Olmos RA (June 2010). "Feasibility of sentinel node detection in renal cell carcinoma: a pilot study". European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 37 (6): 1117–23. doi:10.1007/s00259-009-1359-7. PMID   20111964. S2CID   61891.
  18. Sherif AM, Eriksson E, Thörn M, Vasko J, Riklund K, Ohberg L, Ljungberg BJ (April 2012). "Sentinel node detection in renal cell carcinoma. A feasibility study for detection of tumour-draining lymph nodes". BJU International. 109 (8): 1134–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10444.x . PMID   21883833.
  19. Malmström PU, Ren ZP, Sherif A, de la Torre M, Wester K, Thörn M (November 2002). "Early metastatic progression of bladder carcinoma: molecular profile of primary tumor and sentinel lymph node". The Journal of Urology. 168 (5): 2240–4. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64363-7. PMID   12394767.
  20. Marits P, Karlsson M, Sherif A, Garske U, Thörn M, Winqvist O (January 2006). "Detection of immune responses against urinary bladder cancer in sentinel lymph nodes". European Urology. 49 (1): 59–70. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2005.09.010. PMID   16321468.
  21. Wagman LD. "Principles of Surgical Oncology" in Pazdur R, Wagman LD, Camphausen KA, Hoskins WJ (Eds) Cancer Management: A Multidisciplinary Approach Archived 2013-10-04 at the Wayback Machine . 11 ed. 2008.
  22. Thomas JM (January 2008). "Prognostic false-positivity of the sentinel node in melanoma". Nature Clinical Practice. Oncology. 5 (1): 18–23. doi:10.1038/ncponc1014. PMID   18097453. S2CID   7068382.
  23. Gould EA, Winship T, Philbin PH, Kerr HH (1960). "Observations on a "sentinel node" in cancer of the parotid". Cancer. 13: 77–8. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(196001/02)13:1<77::aid-cncr2820130114>3.0.co;2-d . PMID   13828575.
  24. Cabanas RM (February 1977). "An approach for the treatment of penile carcinoma". Cancer. 39 (2): 456–66. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197702)39:2<456::aid-cncr2820390214>3.0.co;2-i . PMID   837331.
  25. Tanis PJ, Nieweg OE, Valdés Olmos RA, Th Rutgers EJ, Kroon BB (2001). "History of sentinel node and validation of the technique". Breast Cancer Research. 3 (2): 109–12. doi:10.1186/bcr281. PMC   139441 . PMID   11250756.
  26. Veronesi, Umberto et al. (2006) Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy as a staging procedure in breast cancer: update of a randomised controlled study. Lancet Oncol 7:983‒990 doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70947-0
  27. Veronesi, Umberto et al. (2003) A Randomized Comparison of Sentinel-Node Biopsy with Routine Axillary Dissection in Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med 349:546-553 DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa012782

Further reading