Vedic Sanskrit grammar

Last updated

Vedic Sanskrit is the name given by modern scholarship to the oldest attested descendant of the Proto-Indo-Aryan language. This is the language that was used in the religious hymns known as the four Vedas, in particular, the Rigveda, the oldest of them, dated to have been composed roughly over the period from 1500 to 1000 BCE. Before its standardization as Sanskrit, the Vedic language was a purely spoken language during that period used before the introduction of writing in the language. [1] [2] [3]

Contents

The Vedic language has inherited from its ultimate-parent (the Proto-Indo-European language) an elaborate system of morphology, more of which has been preserved in Sanskrit as a whole than in other kindred languages such as Ancient Greek or Latin. [4] [5] Its grammar differs greatly from the later Classical Sanskrit in many regards, one being that this complex inherited morphology simplified over time.

History

The language descended from Proto-Indo-Aryan language, which entered the Indian subcontinent with the arrival of the Proto-Indo-Aryans dated to be around 1800–1500 BCE. [6] [7] The Vedic hymns are estimated to have been composed between 1500 and 1000 BCE, with the language of each hymn fixed at the time of its oral composition, [8] establishing a religious canon around a literary tradition.

As the popular speech unavoidably evolved over the centuries the Vedic hymns began to be increasingly inaccessible. In order to "arrest" language change, there arose a rigorous linguistic tradition aimed at preserving the literary language, culminating in the work of Pāṇini's Aṣṭādhyayī, dated around 600–400 BCE, which marks the beginning of 'Sanskrit', referred to in contradistinction to the Vedic language as 'Classical. [ verification needed ]

Despite these efforts, by the time of Pāṇini's final definition, the language had undergone some changes, especially in grammar. The following sections will focus on these differences between the Vedic and Classical Sanskrit. Those features that were incorporated into the 'official definition' by Panini can be seen in Classical Sanskrit and related pages. [9] [10] [lower-alpha 1]

Differences between Vedic and Classical Sanskrit

Over time, the language that would become Classical Sanskrit reduced and regularized much of the complex morphology that it had originally inherited from Proto-Indo-European: [9] [11]

Nouns

Basics

Declension of a noun in Sanskrit involves the interplay of two 'dimensions': 3 numbers and 8 cases, yielding a combination of 24 possible forms, although owing to syncretism of some forms, the practical number can be lower. [13] [lower-alpha 2]

In addition, adjectives behave much the same way morphologically as nouns do, and can conveniently be considered together. While the same noun cannot be seen to be of more than one gender, adjectives change gender on the basis of the noun they are being applied to, along with case and number, thus giving the following variables: [15] [16]

13 numberssingular, dual, plural
23 gendersmasculine, feminine, neuter
38 casesnominative, accusative, instrumental,

dative, ablative, genitive, locative, vocative

Building blocks

Roots

The oldest system of declension was to affix the endings directly to the nominal root. This was an ancient feature already in decline in later Proto-Indo-European. Of the daughter languages, this system has been best preserved by Vedic Sanskrit. [17]

Ancient noun roots in kindred languages
SanskritLatin PIE Glossary
pā́d-pē(d)s, ped-*pódsfoot
vā́c-vōx, vōc-*wṓkʷsspeech
rā́j-rēx, rēg-*h₃rḗǵsking, ruler

Stems

In Proto-Indo-European, a new system developed wherein an intermediary called the thematic vowel is inserted to the root before the final endings are appended: *-o- which in Sanskrit becomes -a-, producing the thematic stem.

Declension of a thematic stem is less complicated owing to the fact that a host of Sandhi rules apply no more, and the later stages of the Sanskrit language see an increase in the profusion of thematic nouns. Thus in classical Sanskrit, the thematic pā́da-s is more likely to be found than its athematic predecessor. [18] [19]

Cases

Sanskrit nouns are declined for eight cases:

Endings

The basic scheme of suffixation is given in the table below and applies to many nouns and adjectives.

However, according to the gender and the final consonant or vowel of the uninflected word-stem, there are internal sandhi rules dictating the form of the inflected word. Furthermore, these are standalone forms, which when used in actual phrases are subject to external sandhi. [lower-alpha 3] [21] [22]

SingularDualPlural
Masc./FemNeu.Masc./FemNeu.Masc./FemNeu.
Nominative-s-au-as-i
Accusative-am
Instrumental-bhyām-bhis
Dative-e-bhyas
Ablative-as
Genitive-os-ām
Locative-i-su

Root Declension

This is the old athematic method of Proto-Indo-European declension still in active use in Vedic. [23] [24] [lower-alpha 4]

Consonant-stem singular
CaseStd Endingpád-vā́c-rā́j-path- [upper-alpha 1] [lower-alpha 5] mā́s- [upper-alpha 2] víś- [upper-alpha 3]
Nominative, Vocative-spā́tvā́krā́ṭpatmā́svíṭ
Accusative-ampā́d·amvā́c·amrā́j·ampath·ámmā́s·amvíś·am
Instrumentalpad·ā́vāc·ā́ráj·āpath·ā́mā́s·āviś·ā́
Dative-epad·évāc·érā́j·epath·émā́s·eviś·é
Ablative, Genitive-aspad·ásvāc·ásrā́j·aspath·ásmā́s·asviś·ás
Locative-ipad·ívāc·írā́j·ipath·ímā́s·iviś·í
Consonant-stem dual
CaseStd Endingpád-vā́c-rā́j-mā́s-vís-
Nominative
Accusative
Vocative
-aupā́d·auvā́c·aurā́j·aumā́s·āviś·ā
Instrumental
Dative
Ablative
-bhyāmpad·bhyā́mvāg·bhyā́mrā́g·bhyāmmā́d·bhyāmviḍ·bhyā́m
Genitive
Locative
-ospad·ósvāc·ósrā́j·osmā́s·osviś·ós
Consonant-stem plural
CaseStd Endingpád-vā́c-rā́j-mā́s-víś-
Nominative, Vocative-aspā́d·asvā́c·asrā́j·asmā́s·asvíś·as
Accusative-aspad·ásvāc·ásrā́j·asmās·ásvíś·as
Instrumental-bhispad·bhísvāg·bhísrā́g·bhismād·bhísviḍ·bhís
Dative
Ablative
-bhyaspad·bhyásvāg·bhyásrā́g·bhyasmād·bhyásviḍ·bhyás
Genitive-āmpad·ā́mvāc·ā́mrā́j·āmmās·ā́mviś·ā́m
Locative-supat·súvāk·ṣúrā́k·ṣumās·suvik·ṣú

Root ī-stem, vṛkī́s and devī́- feminines

A group of 80 polysyllabic ī-stems, most of which are feminine, are accented on the final vowel. Known as vṛkī́s feminines, [25] these exhibit different behavior during declension compared to the later language, such as the nominative singular retaining the -s ending, and in the accent staying on the -i-.

Further, a number of largely feminine ī-stems, known as the devī́-feminines, also exhibit some differences compared to the later language.

These, along with root stems in -ī, [lower-alpha 6] can be seen below: [26] [27]

Consonant-stem singular
CaseStd EndingTreatmentEndingdhī́- [upper-alpha 4] rathī́- [upper-alpha 5] devī́- [upper-alpha 6]
Nominative, Vocative-s-sdhī́·srathī́·sdevī́
Accusative-amshort(i) + y + -am-iyamdhíy·amrathí·amdevī́·m
Instrumentalshort(i) + y + ā-iyādhiy·ā́rathí·ādevy·ā́
Dative-e(y)-yedhiy·érathí·edevy·aí
Ablative, Genitive-as(y)-yasdhiy·ásrathí·ásdevy·ā́s
Locative-idevy·ā́m
Consonant-stem dual
CaseStd EndingTreatmentEndingdhī-rathī́-devī́-
Nominative
Accusative
Vocative
-au-audhi·yā́rathí·ādevī́
Instrumental
Dative
Ablative
-bhyām-bhyāmdhī·bhyā́mrathī́·bhyāmdeví·bhyām
Genitive
Locative
-os-osdhiy·ósrathí·osdevy·ós
Consonant-stem plural
CaseStd EndingTreatmentEndingdhī-rathī́-devī́-
Nominative, Vocative-as(y)-asdhíy·asrathí·asdevī́·s
Accusative-as(y)-sdhíy·asrathí·sdevī́·s
Instrumental-bhis-bhisdhī·bhísrathī́·bhsdevī́·bhis
Dative
Ablative
-bhyas-bhyasrathī́·bhyasdevī́·bhyas
Genitive-ām(n)-nāmdhī·nā́mrathī́·nā́mdevī́·nām
Locative-su-sudhī·súrathī́·ṣudevī́·ṣu

Compounds

Vedic Sanskrit inherits from the Proto-Indo-European period the ability to combine two or more words into a single one treated as a simple word with regard to accent, inflexion and construction.

The Vedic language, both in the frequency and the length of the compounds is very similar to the Greek of Homer. In the Ṛg-veda and the Atharvaveda, no compounds of more than 3 independent members are found, and even compounds of 3 members are rare: pūrva·kāma·kṛ́tvan, "fulfilling former wishes." [28] In the later language, both the frequency and the number of words used to form compounds greatly increases. [29]

The main types of compound-forming were the co-ordinative [lower-greek 1] , determinative [lower-greek 2] , possessive [lower-greek 3] and the adverbial [lower-greek 4] . [30]

Numerals

See Sanskrit Numerals

Verbs

Basics

Verb conjugation in Sanskrit involves the interplay of number [lower-greek 5] , person [lower-greek 6] , voice [lower-greek 7] , mood [lower-greek 8] and tense [lower-greek 9] , with the following variables: [31] [32]

13 numberssingular [lower-greek 10] , dual [lower-greek 11] , plural [lower-greek 12]
23 personsfirst [lower-alpha 7] [lower-greek 13] , second [lower-greek 14] , third [lower-greek 15]
33 voicesactive [lower-greek 16] , middle [lower-greek 17] , passive [lower-greek 18]
45 moodsindicative, optative, imperative, subjunctive, [lower-alpha 8] injunctive [lower-alpha 8]
55 tensespresent, imperfect, perfect, aorist, future

Further, participles are considered part of the verbal systems although they are not verbs themselves, and as with other Sanskrit nouns, they can be declined across seven or eight cases, for three genders and three numbers. [33]

As many as a dozen types of infinitives can be found in Vedic, although only a couple of types are frequent.

Building blocks

Stem formation

The starting point for conjugation is the root. As a first step, the root may be subject to treatment to form a stem, to which personal endings are suffixed. The types of possible treatment are: [34] [35]

  • Suffixion: the theme vowel -a- may be appended, or one of several other suffixes -ya-, -ó- / -nó-, -nā-, and -aya-. [36]
  • Infixion: A nasal infix (n, ñ, , ) may be inserted within the root, which when accented is -ná-. [37]
  • The root may undergo reduplication. [38]
  • In some tenses or moods, the augment á- may be prefixed. [39]
  • In many cases, the accent may vary between the root and the ending, accompanied by corresponding changes in the gradation of the root vowel. [40]

If V is the vowel of the zero grade, the guṇa-grade vowel is traditionally thought of as a + V, and the vṛddhi-grade vowel as ā + V.

Grades
Vowel (zero) gradea, –i, īu, ū,
Short diphthong (Guṇa) gradea, aiaiauaral
Long diphthong (Vṛddhi) gradeā, āiāiāuārāl

Personal endings

Conjugational endings in Vedic convey person, number, and voice. Different forms of the endings are used depending on what tense stem and mood they are attached to. Verb stems or the endings themselves may be changed or obscured by sandhi.

The primary, secondary, perfect and imperative endings are essentially the same as seen in Classic Sanskrit. The subjunctive endings can be seen below: [41]

PersonActiveMiddle
SingularDualPluralSingularDualPlural
Subjunctive1.-ā, -āni-vá-má-āi-váhāi-máhāi, -máhai
2.-si, -s-thás-thá-sāi, -sái-ā́ithai-dhvā́i
3.-ti, -t-tás-(á)n-tāi, -tái-ā́itai-ántai, -ánta

Primary endings are used with present indicative and future forms. Secondary endings are used with the imperfect, conditional, aorist, and optative. Perfect, imperative and subjunctive endings are used with the perfect, imperative and subjunctive respectively.

Conjugation

Present system

The present system includes the present tense, the imperfect, and the optative, imperative and subjunctive moods, and well as rare occurrences of injunctive [42]

Perfect system

The perfect is used mainly in the indicative. The stem is formed with reduplication as with the present system.

The perfect system also produces separate "strong" and "weak" forms of the verb — the strong form is used with the singular active, and the weak form with the rest.

The perfect in the Sanskrit can be in form of the simple perfect and the periphrastic perfect.

The Simple Perfect can form an augmented Pluperfect, and beyond the indicative mood it can also form Perfect Subjunctives, Optatives, and Imperatives. All of these are lost in Classical Sanskrit, when it forms only indicatives.

The simple perfect is the most common form and can be made from most of the roots. The simple perfect stem is made by reduplication and if necessary by stem lengthening. The conjugated form takes special perfect endings. The periphrastic perfect is used with causative, desiderative, denominative and roots with prosodic long anlauted vowel (except a/ā). Only few roots can form both the simple and the periphrastic perfect. These are bhṛ 'carry', uṣ 'burn', vid 'know', bhi 'to be afraid', hu 'sacrifice'.

Aorist system

The aorist system includes aorist proper (with past indicative meaning, e.g. abhūs 'you were') and some of the forms of the ancient injunctive (used almost exclusively with in prohibitions, e.g. mā bhūs 'don't be'). The principal distinction of the two is presence/absence of an augment – a- prefixed to the stem.

The aorist system stem actually has three different formations: the simple aorist, the reduplicating aorist (semantically related to the causative verb), and the sibilant aorist. The simple aorist is taken directly from the root stem (e.g. bhū-: a-bhū-t 'he was'). The reduplicating aorist involves reduplication as well as vowel reduction of the stem. The sibilant aorist is formed with the suffixation of s to the stem. The sibilant aorist by itself has four formations:

  • athematic s-aorist
  • athematic iṣ-aorist
  • athematic siṣ-aorist
  • thematic s-aorist

Future system

The future system is formed with the suffixion of -syá- or -iṣyá- and guṇa.

Examples of conjugation

Comprehensive conjugation tables can be found in the Classical Sanskrit page linked above. Some notes on elements specific to Vedic Sanskrit below:

bhū – 'to be'

The optative takes secondary endings. -ya- is added to the stem both in the active and the middle. In some forms the cluster ya is dropped out.

Optative
PersonActiveMiddle
SingularDualPluralSingularDualPlural
1.bhávaiyāmbhávai(yā)vabhávai(yā)mabhávaiya(m)bhávai(yā)vahibhávai(yā)mahi
2.bhávai(ya)sbhávai(ya)tambhávai(ya)tabhávai(ya)thāsbhávaiyāthāmbhávai(ya)dhvam
3.bhávai(yā)tbhávai(ya)tāmbhávaiyusbhávai(ya)tabhávaiyātāmbhávairan

The subjunctive takes subjunctive endings.

Subjunctive
PersonActiveMiddle
SingularDualPluralSingularDualPlural
1.bhávā(ni)bhávāvabhávāmabháv(ām)āibhávāvahāibhávāmahāi
2.bhávas(i)bhávāthasbhávāthabhávāsāibhávāithaibhávadhvāi
3.bhávat(i)bhávātasbhávānbhávātāibhávāitaibhávanta(i)

The following stems can take all endings.

Other stems
PassiveCausativeDesiderativeIntensive
bhūya-bhāvaya-bubhūṣa-baubhavī-
as – 'to be'
Present, Indicative
PersonActive
SingularDualPlural
1.ásmisvássmás
2.ásisthássthá
3.ástistássánti
Imperfect, Indicative
PersonActive
SingularDualPlural
1.ā́samā́svaā́sma
2.ā́sīsā́stamā́sta
3.ā́sītā́stāmā́san

Infinitives

The most notable difference between Vedic and Classical Sanskrit is in the area of the infinitive. Against the single type of infinitive in the later language, there exist, in Vedic, several forms, all of them being old cases of verbal nouns. [43] [44]

The following main types of infinitive can be identified in Vedic, noted in descending order of frequency:

Dative infinitive

The ending used to form this adjective is -e. [lower-alpha 9] The ending may be directly added to the root, whether of a simple or compounded verb, or additional elements (-as-, -i, -ti, -tu, -tavā, -tyā, -dhyā, -man, -van) may be interspersed in different cases of roots. [44]

Accusative infinitive

The ending used here is either -am affixed to the weak form of a root, or -tum just as in the Latin supine. [44] The latter form is the only one that survives in Classical Sanskrit. [43]

Ablative-genitive infinitive

This functions more as a verbal noun than a genuine infinitive. There are again two ways of forming this: -as or -tos. [44]

Locative infinitive

This is very rare, even in the oldest language. Between the root and the locative ending -i, -tar- or -san- may be inserted. [44]

Syntax

Because of Vedic's complex declension system the word order is free (with tendency toward SOV).

Sample

Sample Vedic Sanskrit text with accentuation etc.:

See also

Notes

  1. Sanskrit nouns, Sanskrit verbs
  2. Though in PIE, formal gender differentiation was low, with masculine/feminine nouns showing identical inflections, and the neuter class differing from them only with regard to the nominative and accusative, [14] in Sanskrit, nouns are classified as belonging to any one of three genders.
  3. such as, the mutation of -s to -ḥ or -r etc.
  4. Note how the vowel in pád- is elongated when accented.
  5. only attested in the singular
  6. the change of -ī to -iy- applies only to these
  7. not found in the imperative
  8. 1 2 Vedic-only
  9. which when following a root ending in -ā results in -ai
  10. compound form
  11. note the double accent
  12. cf Greek: δό·μεν·αι
  13. cf Greek: ἴδ·μεν·αι

Glossary

  1. path m.
  2. month m.
  3. settlement, -wich f.
  4. thought, f
  5. charioteer, m.f.
  6. goddess, f
  7. to be
  8. to send
  9. to see
  10. to enjoy
  11. to grab
  12. to speak
  13. to ask
  14. to see
  15. to fare
  16. to fear
  17. to strive
  18. to be resplendent
  19. to fight
  20. to grab
  21. to understand
  22. to refresh
  23. to drink
  24. to eat
  25. to go
  26. to make
  27. to go
  28. to drink
  29. to bear
  30. to speak
  31. to live
  32. to think
  33. to know
  34. to injure
  35. to ask
  36. to reach
  37. to shine
  38. to prolong
  39. to place upon
  40. to give
  41. to ask
  42. to present
  43. to eat
  44. to see
  45. being pierced
  46. to falling down
  47. binding
  48. leaping across
  49. going
  50. being born
  51. putting down
  52. shattered
  53. on beholding
  54. on seeing
  55. at the waking
  56. to support
  57. to lead
  58. to pass
  59. storm-gods
  60. the sea-god
  61. the fire-god
  62. the divine twins
  63. presses/extracts the soma juice

Traditional glossary and notes

  1. dvandva
  2. tatpuruṣa
  3. bahuvrīhi
  4. avyayībhava
  5. vacana
  6. puruṣa
  7. prayoga
  8. artha
  9. kāla
  10. eka·vacana
  11. dvi·vacana
  12. bahu·vacana
  13. prathama·puruṣa
  14. dvitīya·puruṣa
  15. tṛtīya·puruṣa
  16. kartari·prayoga
  17. karmaṇi·prayoga
  18. bhāve·prayoga

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tocharian languages</span> Extinct Indo-European languages in Asia

The Tocharianlanguages, also known as the Arśi-Kuči, Agnean-Kuchean or Kuchean-Agnean languages, are an extinct branch of the Indo-European language family spoken by inhabitants of the Tarim Basin, the Tocharians. The languages are known from manuscripts dating from the 5th to the 8th century AD, which were found in oasis cities on the northern edge of the Tarim Basin and the Lop Desert. The discovery of these languages in the early 20th century contradicted the formerly prevalent idea of an east–west division of the Indo-European language family as centum and satem languages, and prompted reinvigorated study of the Indo-European family. Scholars studying these manuscripts in the early 20th century identified their authors with the Tokharoi, a name used in ancient sources for people of Bactria (Tokharistan). Although this identification is now believed to be mistaken, "Tocharian" remains the usual term for these languages.

In linguistics, the Indo-European ablaut is a system of apophony in the Proto-Indo-European language (PIE).

The augment is an Indo-European verbal prefix used in Indo-Iranian, Greek, Phrygian, Armenian, and Albanian, to indicate past time. The augment might be either a Proto-Indo-European archaic feature lost elsewhere or a common innovation in those languages. In the oldest attested daughter languages, such as Vedic Sanskrit and early Greek, it is used optionally. The same verb forms when used without the augment carry an injunctive sense.

In Indo-European studies, a thematic vowel or theme vowel is the vowel *e or *o from ablaut placed before the ending of a Proto-Indo-European (PIE) word. Nouns, adjectives, and verbs in the Indo-European languages with this vowel are thematic, and those without it are athematic. Used more generally, a thematic vowel is any vowel found at the end of the stem of a word.

Vedic Sanskrit, also simply referred as the Vedic language, is an ancient language of the Indo-Aryan subgroup of the Indo-European language family. It is attested in the Vedas and related literature compiled over the period of the mid-2nd to mid-1st millennium BCE. It is orally preserved, predating the advent of writing by several centuries.

In grammar, a supine is a form of verbal noun used in some languages. The term is most often used for Latin, where it is one of the four principal parts of a verb. The word refers to a position of lying on one's back, but there exists no widely accepted etymology that explains why or how the term came to be used to also describe this form of a verb.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Proto-Indo-European language</span> Ancestor of the Indo-European languages

Proto-Indo-European (PIE) is the reconstructed common ancestor of the Indo-European language family. No direct record of Proto-Indo-European exists; its proposed features have been derived by linguistic reconstruction from documented Indo-European languages.

Proto-Indo-European verbs reflect a complex system of morphology, more complicated than the substantive, with verbs categorized according to their aspect, using multiple grammatical moods and voices, and being conjugated according to person, number and tense. In addition to finite forms thus formed, non-finite forms such as participles are also extensively used.

A feature common to all Indo-European languages is the presence of a verb corresponding to the English verb to be.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Proto-Celtic language</span> Ancestor of the Celtic languages

Proto-Celtic, or Common Celtic, is the hypothetical ancestral proto-language of all known Celtic languages, and a descendant of Proto-Indo-European. It is not attested in writing but has been partly reconstructed through the comparative method. Proto-Celtic is generally thought to have been spoken between 1300 and 800 BC, after which it began to split into different languages. Proto-Celtic is often associated with the Urnfield culture and particularly with the Hallstatt culture. Celtic languages share common features with Italic languages that are not found in other branches of Indo-European, suggesting the possibility of an earlier Italo-Celtic linguistic unity.

The grammar of the Sanskrit language has a complex verbal system, rich nominal declension, and extensive use of compound nouns. It was studied and codified by Sanskrit grammarians from the later Vedic period, culminating in the Pāṇinian grammar of the 4th century BCE.

Proto-Indo-European nominals include nouns, adjectives, and pronouns. Their grammatical forms and meanings have been reconstructed by modern linguists, based on similarities found across all Indo-European languages. This article discusses nouns and adjectives; Proto-Indo-European pronouns are treated elsewhere.

The roots of the reconstructed Proto-Indo-European language (PIE) are basic parts of words to carry a lexical meaning, so-called morphemes. PIE roots usually have verbal meaning like "to eat" or "to run". Roots never occurred alone in the language. Complete inflected verbs, nouns, and adjectives were formed by adding further morphemes to a root and potentially changing the root's vowel in a process called ablaut.

Sanskrit has inherited from its parent, the Proto-Indo-European language, an elaborate system of verbal morphology, much of which has been preserved in Sanskrit as a whole, unlike in other kindred languages, such as Ancient Greek or Latin. Sanskrit verbs thus have an inflection system for different combinations of tense, aspect, mood, voice, number, and person. Non-finite forms such as participles are also extensively used.

Sanskrit has inherited from its reconstructed parent the Proto-Indo-European language an elaborate system of nominal morphology. Endings may be added directly to the root, or more frequently and especially in the later language, to a stem formed by the addition of a suffix to it.

The nasal infix is a reconstructed nasal consonant or syllable *⟨n(é)⟩ that was inserted (infixed) into the stem or root of a word in the Proto-Indo-European language. It has reflexes in several ancient and modern Indo-European languages. It is one of the affixes that mark the present tense.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Proto-Tocharian language</span> Reconstructed proto-language

Proto-Tocharian, also spelled Proto-Tokharian, is the reconstructed proto-language of the extinct Tocharian branch of the Indo-European languages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Proto-Italic language</span> Ancestor of Latin and other Italic languages

The Proto-Italic language is the ancestor of the Italic languages, most notably Latin and its descendants, the Romance languages. It is not directly attested in writing, but has been reconstructed to some degree through the comparative method. Proto-Italic descended from the earlier Proto-Indo-European language.

Historical linguistics has made tentative postulations about and multiple varyingly different reconstructions of Proto-Germanic grammar, as inherited from Proto-Indo-European grammar. All reconstructed forms are marked with an asterisk (*).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Proto-Slavic language</span> Proto-language of all the Slavic languages

Proto-Slavic is the unattested, reconstructed proto-language of all Slavic languages. It represents Slavic speech approximately from the 2nd millennium BC through the 6th century AD. As with most other proto-languages, no attested writings have been found; scholars have reconstructed the language by applying the comparative method to all the attested Slavic languages and by taking into account other Indo-European languages.

References

  1. Fortson, §10.20–10.28.
  2. Macdonnell, §1.2.
  3. Reich, p. 122.
  4. Fortson, §10.41.
  5. Whitney p. 100 ch. 8.
  6. Fortson, §10.20.
  7. Reich, ch. 6.
  8. Jamison & Brereton, pp.14ff.
  9. 1 2 Burrow, §2.1.
  10. Whitney, p. xi–xv.
  11. Coulson, p. xv–xvi.
  12. Macdonell, §122
  13. Bucknell, p. 11.
  14. Andrew L. Sihler, New Comparative Grammar of Greek and Latin, Oxford University Press1995 p.244.
  15. Bucknell, p. 12-16.
  16. Whitney, §261–266.
  17. Burrow, §4.2
  18. Fortson, §6.43.
  19. Burrow, §4.3
  20. Fortson, §6.
  21. MacDonell, III.71, p. 33.
  22. Whitney, §164–179.
  23. Whitney, §383–399.
  24. Macdonnell (1910) §6.
  25. Beekes, §13.2.5.
  26. Macdonnell (1910), §375–376.
  27. Macdonnell, §100.
  28. Macdonnell, §185
  29. Coulson p xxi
  30. Whitney, §480.
  31. Bucknell, p. 34.
  32. Macdonnell, §121–122.
  33. Burrow, p. 367
  34. Burrow, §7.3.
  35. Whitney, ch 8.
  36. Burrow, §7.8
  37. Whitney, §683
  38. Whitney, §588–590.
  39. Burrow, §7.5.
  40. Burrow, §7.5
  41. Macdonnell, §131.
  42. Macdonnell, §316
  43. 1 2 Burrow, §7.17.
  44. 1 2 3 4 5 Macdonnell, §167.
  45. Whitney, p. 518.
  46. Brereton & Jamison, p. 1603.

Bibliography