Reactions to Grunfeld's works
John Powers writes that Chinese and Tibetan writers attack each other in emotional language,and that the two sides "stake out extreme and uncompromising positions." Tibetan authors impugn Grunfeld's integrity and his authority to write. Powers classifies Grunfeld and Israel Epstein among those who "enthusiastically endorse the Chinese version of events and use much the same language as do Chinese writers to describe conditions in Tibet prior to the 1950s." Grunfeld,continues Powers,paints a picture of a "brutal,exploitative,and primitive society," one that was stratified into a nobility living in opulence while the majority of the people were serfs and slaves. Others agree the reactions are politicized. Those opposing Chinese entrance into Tibet,writes T. Neuhaus,sometimes emphasized "deeper" knowledge rather than fact gathering,and accused Grunfeld and Melvyn Goldstein saying that "they should know better" than to criticize pre-1950s Tibet for being a feudal society.
Reviewing the second edition of The Making of Tibet in the China Quarterly Philip Denwood wrote that Grunfeld gathered material from "diverse and uneven mass of largely secondary material," none in Chinese or Tibetan,and that he "weaves his chronological account with skill." Denwood noted that Grunfeld "seems to have no particular axe to grind or thesis to defend and is at pains to distance himself from the apologists for both Tibet and China,particularly the former." He concludes that "the book should certainly be on the standard list for both the academic and the general reader interested in its subject." [7]
According to Jamyang Norbu,Grunfeld speaks neither Chinese nor Tibetan,and used neither Tibetan nor Chinese sources in his book. [8]
Grunfeld has been drawn into other controversies. Regarding American journalist Edgar Snow (1905–1972),Grunfeld has concluded that he was not a Communist Party member,although he was sympathetic:
Having read through several decades (1920s-1960s) of Snow's diaries,countless pages of correspondence,his FBI file,two biographies,at least one MA thesis and countless articles leads me to believe he was not a member of the CPUSA... That he was sympathetic to some of their ideas and activities is,to my mind,beyond doubt. [9]
Works
Grunfeld wrote his doctoral dissertation on "Friends of the Revolution:American Supporters of China's Communists,1926–1939" (New York:University Microfilms International:1985). [10]
Books: Books written,edited,or co-written or co-edited include:
- The Making of Modern Tibet (1987, [11] 1996,2015 [12] )
- On Her Own:Journalistic Adventures from the San Francisco Earthquake to the Chinese Revolution,1917-1927 (1993,2017) [13]
- World Civilizations:Sources,Images and Interpretations,Volume 1 (1998,2001,2005) [14]
- World Civilizations:Sources,Images and Interpretations,Volume 2 (1998,2001,2005) [15]
- The Vietnam War:A History in Documents (2002,2003) [16]
Articles: Articles published include:
- "Roof of the World / A Review Essay" Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars (1977) [17]
- "'God We Had Fun':The CIA in China and Sino-American Relations," Critical Asian Studies (2003) [18]
- "Reassessing Tibet Policy" Institute for Policy Studies (2005) [19]
- "Film Reviews:Round Eyes in the Middle Kingdom and They Chose China," Critical Asian Studies (2009) [20]
- "Review:Foreigners and Foreign Institutions in Republican China," Journal of Contemporary Asia (2014) [21]
- Grunfeld, A. Tom (1997). "Demystifying Tibet: Unlocking the Secrets of the Land of the Snows". H-Net: Humanities & Social Sciences Online.
- "Tibet and the United States," Contemporary Tibet: Politics, Development and Society in a Disputed Region (2017) [22]
This page is based on this
Wikipedia article Text is available under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
