Alan Manning

Last updated

Alan Manning
Born1960 (age 62–63)
Nationality British
Academic career
Institution London School of Economics
Birkbeck, University of London
Field Labour economics
Alma mater Clare College, Cambridge
Nuffield College, Oxford
Doctoral
advisor		 James Mirrlees [1]
ContributionsMinimum wage, gender pay gap, monopsony
Information at IDEAS / RePEc

Alan Manning (born 1960) is a British economist and professor of economics at the London School of Economics. [2]

Contents

Manning is one of the leading labour economists globally, [3] having made major contributions to the analysis of the imperfections of labour markets, the minimum wage literature, migration, and job polarization. [4]

Education

Alan Manning studied from 1978 to 1981 at Clare College, Cambridge, and from 1981 to 1984 at Nuffield College, Oxford, obtaining a BA (Hons) and a MPhil in economics before graduating with a DPhil in economics from Oxford University in 1985.

Later life and career

After his MPhil, Manning began working at Birkbeck College as lecturer, a position that he held until 1989 when he moved to another lectureship at the London School of Economics. At LSE, he was promoted first to reader in 1993 and then to professor in 1997, a position he has held ever since. At LSE, Manning has been the Director of the Labour Markets and Community Programmes of the Centre for Economic Performance since 2000. Throughout his career, Manning has held editorial positions at the Review of Economic Studies , Labour Economics , New Economy , Economica , Journal of Labor Economics , Applied Economics Journal , and European Economic Review . His contributions to labour economics were rewarded with a fellowship of the Society of Labor Economists in 2014. He was elected fellow of the European Economic Association in 2021. [5]

Research

Alan Manning's research concentrates on labour economics, with a focus on unemployment, minimum wages, monopsony, immigration and gender pay gaps in the UK and Europe. [6] According to IDEAS/RePEc, Manning belongs to the top 1% of economists in terms of research output. [7] In his research, Manning has been a frequent collaborator of Stephen Machin, another British labour economist.

Research on wages, wage bargaining and unemployment

Manning's first area of research has been wage bargaining. This research included the integration of trade union models in a sequential bargaining framework, [8] the relationship between the tax system and wage bargaining in the UK (with Ben Lockwood), [9] and the impact of wage bargaining on the link between unemployment and inflation (the Phillips curve). [10] In the late 1980s, in work with George Alogoskoufis, Manning argued that workers' reluctance to reduce their wage expectations, along with firms' slow adjustment of employment, was among the main reasons for persistently high European unemployment. [11] In the late 1990s, Manning and Machin also investigated the topic of long-term unemployment. [12]

Research on minimum wages

From the mid-1990s on, Manning turned his attention to the study of minimum wages, especially in the UK. Together with Stephen Machin, he found that decreases in the ratio of minimum wages to average wages in the UK in the 1980s had contributed to the growing wage dispersion without raising employment., [13] a finding maintained in further work with Machin and Richard Dickens on the UK. [14] Motivated by his research in the UK and further research by Card, Krueger and Katz in the US, Manning showed how, contrary to conventional wisdom, the theoretical effects of minimum wages on employment are ambiguous, with e.g. a binding minimum wage potentially raising employment even in the presence of involuntary unemployment. [15] At the European level, in joint work several co-authors, Manning found that minimum wages in Europe between the mid-1960s and mid-1990s only caused higher unemployment if they kept the wages of low-wage jobs from decreasing, were relatively small for young people relative to average earnings when compared to the U.S., and didn't appear to have reduced employment, except possibly for young workers. [16] In the early 2000s, Manning studied the impact of the UK National Minimum Wage (NMW) Act of 1998, finding e.g. in a study with Machin and Lupin Rahman that the NMW reduced wage inequality in the heavily industries such as the residential care homes industry by compressing the bottom of the wage distribution, while also reducing employment and hours worked, [17] though further research with Dickens suggested that the NMW's impact on wage inequality was overall limited due to only affecting 6–7% of UK workers directly. [18] More recently, together with Ghazala Asmat and John van Reenen, Manning has studied the impact of the deregulation of product and labour markets in the OECD on the wage share, finding that, on average, privatization accounts for a firth of the decrease in labour's share between 1980 and 2000, but for nearly half in Britain and France. [19]

Research on imperfect competition in labour markets

Since the 1990s, Manning has researched the impact of employers' market power in labour markets and its impact on especially wages, e.g. in the UK. [20] This research agenda was popularized in a JEP article by Manning, Bhaskar and To, [21] research on modern monopsonies in the UK, [22] and, perhaps most importantly, in Monopsony in Motion, [23] a book that comprehensively sets out Manning's thinking about modern monopsonies in labour markets and was received with mixed reviews by other economists. [24] [25] A comprehensive survey of imperfect competition in the labour market by Manning was published in the Handbook of Labor Economics. [26]

Research on gender in labour markets

Another important field in Manning's research are gender-specific issues in labour market outcomes. Together with Azmat and Maia Guell, Manning shows that, in countries with large gender gaps in unemployment rates, there also are large gender gaps in flows between employment and unemployment, possibly due to the combination of gender differences in human capital and its interaction with labour market institutions. [27] In a study with Barbara Petrongolo on the part-time pay penalty for women in the UK, Manning attributes half of the penalty to differences in the characteristics of female full-time and part-time workers, especially occupational segregation, which also explains most of its growth in the 1980s and 1990s. [28] Finally, in work with Joanna Swaffield, Manning has also studied the gender gap in early-career wage growth in the UK. [29]

Research on job polarization

A more recent field of Manning's research is the study of technological change and job polarization. In the mid-2000s, in the wake of research by Autor, Levy and Murnane, Manning argued that the demand for the least-skilled jobs may be growing, albeit dependent on the physical proximity to the more-skilled. [30] In his most highly cited publication, together with Maarten Goos, Manning showed that the UK had experienced since 1975 a pattern of polarization with rises in employment shares in the highest- and lowest-wage occupations and a "hollowing out" of medium-wage occupations, a pattern consistent with Autor et al.'s "routinization" hypothesis; for the 1970s to the 1990s, this polarization accounts for, respectively, half and one third of the growth in wage inequality in the upper and lower parts of the UK wage distribution. [31] This finding – the concentration of employment in low- and high-paid jobs with high non-routine task contents – was maintained in further research by Manning and Goos with Anna Salomons on overall Europe, [32] wherein routine-biased technological change and offshoring play key roles. [33]

Research on immigration and identity

One of Manning's most recent research endeavours concerns the analysis of immigration and identity. For instance, together with Dustmann, Glitz and Algan, he found that in the UK, France and partly also in Germany, the gap between natives and immigrants in terms of educational achievement decreases over generations, though overall in all three countries the labour market performance of most immigrant groups as well as their descendants is still generally worse than that of natives, even if differences in education, regional allocation and experience are taken into account. [34] In research with Sanchari Roy on the extent and determinants of British identity, he found that "the vast majority of those born in Britain, of whatever ethnicity or religion, think of themselves as British", while "newly arrived immigrants almost never think of themselves as British but the longer they remain in the UK, the more likely it is that they do". [35] Finally, in a study with Marco Manacorda and Jonathan Wadsworth on the impact of immigration to the UK on the structure of wages, Manning found that immigration primarily reduced the wages of immigrants – and in particular university-educated immigrants – with little effect on the wages of the native-born, suggesting that UK natives and foreign born workers are imperfect substitutes. [36]

Bibliography

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Labour economics</span> Study of the markets for wage labour

Labour economics, or labor economics, seeks to understand the functioning and dynamics of the markets for wage labour. Labour is a commodity that is supplied by labourers, usually in exchange for a wage paid by demanding firms. Because these labourers exist as parts of a social, institutional, or political system, labour economics must also account for social, cultural and political variables.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Macroeconomics</span> Study of an economy as a whole

Macroeconomics is a branch of economics that deals with the performance, structure, behavior, and decision-making of an economy as a whole. This includes regional, national, and global economies. Macroeconomists study topics such as output/GDP and national income, unemployment, price indices and inflation, consumption, saving, investment, energy, international trade, and international finance.

A minimum wage is the lowest remuneration that employers can legally pay their employees—the price floor below which employees may not sell their labor. Most countries had introduced minimum wage legislation by the end of the 20th century. Because minimum wages increase the cost of labor, companies often try to avoid minimum wage laws by using gig workers, by moving labor to locations with lower or nonexistent minimum wages, or by automating job functions. Minimum wage policies can vary significantly between countries or even within a country, with different regions, sectors, or age groups having their own minimum wage rates. These variations are often influenced by factors such as the cost of living, regional economic conditions, and industry-specific factors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Unemployment</span> People without work and actively seeking work

Unemployment, according to the OECD, is people above a specified age not being in paid employment or self-employment but currently available for work during the reference period.

New Keynesian economics is a school of macroeconomics that strives to provide microeconomic foundations for Keynesian economics. It developed partly as a response to criticisms of Keynesian macroeconomics by adherents of new classical macroeconomics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Living wage</span> Minimum income to meet a workers basic needs

A living wage is defined as the minimum income necessary for a worker to meet their basic needs. This is not the same as a subsistence wage, which refers to a biological minimum, or a solidarity wage, which refers to a minimum wage tracking labor productivity. Needs are defined to include food, housing, and other essential needs such as clothing. The goal of a living wage is to allow a worker to afford a basic but decent standard of living through employment without government subsidies. Due to the flexible nature of the term "needs", there is not one universally accepted measure of what a living wage is and as such it varies by location and household type. A related concept is that of a family wage – one sufficient to not only support oneself, but also to raise a family.


The term efficiency wages was introduced by Alfred Marshall to denote the wage per efficiency unit of labor. Marshallian efficiency wages are those calculated with efficiency or ability exerted being the unit of measure rather than time. That is, the more efficient worker will be paid more than a less efficient worker for the same amount of hours worked.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">David Card</span> Canadian economist (b. 1956)

David Edward Card is a Canadian-American labour economist and the Class of 1950 Professor of Economics at the University of California, Berkeley, where he has been since 1997. He was awarded half of the 2021 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences "for his empirical contributions to labour economics", with Joshua Angrist and Guido Imbens jointly awarded the other half.

Wage differential is a term used in labour economics to analyze the relation between the wage rate and the unpleasantness, risk, or other undesirable attributes of a particular job. A compensating differential, which is also called a compensating wage differential or an equalizing difference, is defined as the additional amount of income that a given worker must be offered in order to motivate them to accept a given undesirable job, relative to other jobs that worker could perform. One can also speak of the compensating differential for an especially desirable job, or one that provides special benefits, but in this case the differential would be negative: that is, a given worker would be willing to accept a lower wage for an especially desirable job, relative to other jobs.

Involuntary unemployment occurs when a person is unemployed despite being willing to work at the prevailing wage. It is distinguished from voluntary unemployment, where a person chooses not to work because their reservation wage is higher than the prevailing wage. In an economy with involuntary unemployment, there is a surplus of labor at the current real wage. This occurs when there is some force that prevents the real wage rate from decreasing to the real wage rate that would equilibrate supply and demand. Structural unemployment is also involuntary.

In economics, a monopsony is a market structure in which a single buyer substantially controls the market as the major purchaser of goods and services offered by many would-be sellers. The microeconomic theory of monopsony assumes a single entity to have market power over all sellers as the only purchaser of a good or service. This is a similar power to that of a monopolist, which can influence the price for its buyers in a monopoly, where multiple buyers have only one seller of a good or service available to purchase from.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dennis Snower</span> American-German economist (born 1950)

Dennis J. Snower is an American-German economist, specialising in macroeconomic theory and policy, labor economics, digital governance, social economics, and the psychology of economic decisions in "caring economics". He is President of the Global Solutions Initiative in Berlin, Professorial Research Fellow at the Institute for New Economic Thinking at Oxford University, Fellow at the New Institute in Hamburg, and Non-resident Fellow of the Brookings Institution in Washington, D.C. He is former president of the Kiel Institute for the World Economy. His prominent labor research explores the role of “insiders” and “outsiders” in generating unemployment and macroeconomic fluctuations; his socio-economic research examines how social groups shape economic behavior; his psycho-economic research explains how economic decisions depend on psychological motives; and his macroeconomic research investigates why inflation and unemployment can move in opposite directions even in the long run.

Thomas Lemieux is a Canadian economist and professor at the University of British Columbia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Haroon Bhorat</span> South African economist

Haroon Bhorat is Professor of Economics and Director of the Development Policy Research Unit (DPRU) at the University of Cape Town. His area of research has concentrated on labour economics and poverty/income distribution mainly in his native South Africa, and recently, been expanded to other parts of Africa - in which he is world-renowned authority.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stephen Machin</span>

Stephen Jonathan Machin is a British economist and professor of economics at the London School of Economics (LSE). Moreover, he is currently director of the Centre for Economic Performance (CEP) and is a fellow of the British Academy, the Society of Labor Economists and the European Economic Association. His current research interests include labour market inequality, the economics of education, and the economics of crime.

Christian Dustmann, FBA, is a German economist who currently serves as Professor of Economics at the Department of Economics of University College London. There, he also works as Director of the Centre for Research and Analysis of Migration (CReAM), which he helped found. Dustmann belongs to the world's foremost labour economists and migration scholars.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pierre Cahuc</span> French economist

Pierre Cahuc is a French economist who currently works as Professor of Economics at Sciences Po. He is Program Director for the IZA Institute of Labor Economics's programme "Labour Markets" and research fellow at CEPR. His research focuses mainly on labour economics and its relationship with macroeconomics. In 2001, he was awarded the Prize of the Best Young Economist of France for his contributions to economic research. He belongs to the most highly cited economists in France and Europe's leading labour economists.

Francis Kramarz is a French economist who works as Professor at the École Nationale de la Statistique et de l'Administration Économique (ENSAE), where he has been directing the Center for Research in Economics and Statistics (CREST). He is one of the leading labour economists in France.

Arindrajit (Arin) Dube is a professor of economics at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, known internationally for his empirical research on the effects of minimum wage policies. He is among the foremost scholars regarding the economic impact of minimum wages. In 2019, he was asked by the UK Treasury to conduct a review of the evidence on the impact of minimum wages, which informed the decision to set the level of the National Living Wage. His work is focused on the economics of the labor market, including the role of imperfect competition, institutions, norms, and behavioral factors that affect wage setting and jobs.

The gift-exchange game, also commonly known as the gift exchange dilemma, is a common economic game introduced by George Akerlof and Janet Yellen to model reciprocacy in labor relations. The gift-exchange game simulates a labor-management relationship execution problem in the principal-agent problem in labor economics. The simplest form of the game involves two players – an employee and an employer. The employer first decides whether they should award a higher salary to the employee. The employee then decides whether to reciprocate with a higher level of effort due to the salary increase or not. Like trust games, gift-exchange games are used to study reciprocity for human subject research in social psychology and economics. If the employer pays extra salary and the employee puts in extra effort, then both players are better off than otherwise. The relationship between an investor and an investee has been investigated as the same type of a game.

References

  1. ↑ "Alan Manning - The Mathematics Genealogy Project". www.mathgenealogy.org. Retrieved 25 February 2023.
  2. ↑ Profile of Alan Manning on the website of LSE. Retrieved April 6th, 2019.
  3. ↑ Manning belongs to the top 1% of labour economists worldwide registered on IDEAS/RePEc. Retrieved February 24th, 2023.
  4. ↑ Manning, Alan. "Personal webpage" . Retrieved 25 February 2023.
  5. ↑ "Fellows | EEA". www.eeassoc.org. Retrieved 5 July 2021.
  6. ↑ Profile of Alan Manning on the website of LSE. Retrieved April 6th, 2019.
  7. ↑ Manning ranks among the top 1% of authors registered on IDEAS/RePEc. Retrieved April 6th, 2019.
  8. ↑ Manning, Alan (1987). "An Integration of Trade Union Models in a Sequential Bargaining Framework". The Economic Journal. 97 (385): 121–139. doi:10.2307/2233326. JSTOR   2233326.
  9. ↑ Lockwood, Ben; Manning, Alan (1993). "Wage setting and the tax system theory and evidence for the United Kingdom". Journal of Public Economics. 52: 1–29. doi:10.1016/0047-2727(93)90102-Y.
  10. ↑ Manning, Alan (1993). "Wage Bargaining and the Phillips Curve: The Identification and Specification of Aggregate Wage Equations". The Economic Journal. 103 (416): 98–118. doi:10.2307/2234339. JSTOR   2234339.
  11. ↑ Alogoskoufis, George S.; Manning, Alan; Calmfors, Lars; Danthine, Jean-Pierre (1988). "On the Persistence of Unemployment". Economic Policy. 3 (7): 428–469. doi:10.2307/1344492. JSTOR   1344492.
  12. ↑ Machin, Stephen; Manning, Alan (1999). Chapter 47 the causes and consequences of longterm unemployment in Europe. Handbook of Labor Economics. Vol. 3. pp. 3085–3139. doi:10.1016/S1573-4463(99)30038-9. ISBN   9780444501899.
  13. ↑ Machin, Stephen; Manning, Alan (1994). "The Effects of Minimum Wages on Wage Dispersion and Employment: Evidence from the U.K. Wages Councils". Industrial and Labor Relations Review. 47 (2): 319–329. doi:10.2307/2524423. JSTOR   2524423.
  14. ↑ Dickens, Richard; Machin, Stephen; Manning, Alan (1999). "The Effects of Minimum Wages on Employment: Theory and Evidence from Britain". Journal of Labor Economics. 17 (1): 1–22. doi:10.1086/209911. JSTOR   10.1086/209911. S2CID   7012497.
  15. ↑ Manning, Alan (1995). "How do We Know that Real Wages Are too High?". The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 110 (4): 1111–1125. doi:10.2307/2946650. JSTOR   2946650.
  16. ↑ Dolado, Juan; Kramarz, Francis; Machin, Stephen; Manning, Alan; Margolis, David; Teulings, Coen; Saint-Paul, Gilles; Keen, Michael (1996). "The Economic Impact of Minimum Wages in Europe". Economic Policy. 11 (23): 319–372. doi:10.2307/1344707. hdl: 10016/3305 . JSTOR   1344707.
  17. ↑ Machin, Stephen; Manning, Alan; Rahman, Lupin (2003). "Where the Minimum Wage Bites Hard: Introduction of Minimum Wages to a Low Wage Sector". Journal of the European Economic Association. 1 (1): 154–180. doi:10.1162/154247603322256792. JSTOR   40005144.
  18. ↑ Dickens, Richard; Manning, Alan (2004). "Has the National Minimum Wage Reduced UK Wage Inequality?". Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society). 167 (4): 613–626. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2004.aeI2.x . JSTOR   3559879. S2CID   122822481.
  19. ↑ Azmat, Ghazala; Manning, Alan; Reenen, John Van (2012). "Privatization and the Decline of Labour's Share: International Evidence from Network Industries". Economica. 79 (315): 470–492. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.2011.00906.x. S2CID   56258974.
  20. ↑ Dickens, Richard; Machin, Stephen; Manning, Alan (1999). "The Effects of Minimum Wages on Employment: Theory and Evidence from Britain". Journal of Labor Economics. 17 (1): 1–22. doi:10.1086/209911. JSTOR   10.1086/209911. S2CID   7012497.
  21. ↑ Bhaskar, V.; Manning, Alan; To, Ted (2002). "Oligopsony and Monopsonistic Competition in Labor Markets". Journal of Economic Perspectives. 16 (2): 155–174. doi: 10.1257/0895330027300 .
  22. ↑ Manning, Alan (2003). "The real thin theory: Monopsony in modern labour markets". Labour Economics. 10 (2): 105–131. doi:10.1016/S0927-5371(03)00018-6.
  23. ↑ Manning, A. (2003). Monopsony in Motion: Imperfect Competition in Labor Markets. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  24. ↑ Kuhn, Peter (2004). "Is monopsony the right way to model labor markets? A review of Alan Manning's monopsony in motion". International Journal of the Economics of Business. 11 (3): 369–378. doi:10.1080/1357151042000286456. S2CID   17512305.
  25. ↑ Rizzo, Michael (2004). "Book Review: Labor Economics: Monopsony in Motion: Imperfect Competition in Labor Markets". ILR Review. 57 (2): 309–311. doi:10.1177/001979390405700212. S2CID   157695999.
  26. ↑ Alan, Manning (2011). Imperfect Competition in the Labor Market. Handbook of Labor Economics. Vol. 4. pp. 973–1041. doi:10.1016/S0169-7218(11)02409-9. ISBN   9780444534521.
  27. ↑ Azmat, Ghazala; Güell, Maia; Manning, Alan (2006). "Gender Gaps in Unemployment Rates in OECD Countries". Journal of Labor Economics. 24 (1): 1–37. doi:10.1086/497817. JSTOR   10.1086/497817. S2CID   154573165.
  28. ↑ Manning, Alan; Petrongolo, Barbara (2008). "The Part‐Time Pay Penalty for Women in Britain". The Economic Journal. 118 (526): F28–F51. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02115.x. S2CID   153810424.
  29. ↑ Manning, Alan; Swaffield, Joanna (2008). "The Gender Gap in Early‐Career Wage Growth". The Economic Journal. 118 (530): 983–1024. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02158.x. S2CID   154780633.
  30. ↑ Manning, Alan (2004). "We Can Work It Out: The Impact of Technological Change on the Demand for Low-Skill Workers". Scottish Journal of Political Economy. 51 (5): 581–608. doi:10.1111/j.0036-9292.2004.00322.x. S2CID   153742036.
  31. ↑ Goos, Maarten; Manning, Alan (2007). "Lousy and Lovely Jobs: The Rising Polarization of Work in Britain". The Review of Economics and Statistics. 89 (1): 118–133. doi:10.1162/rest.89.1.118. JSTOR   40043079. S2CID   27727245.
  32. ↑ Goos, Maarten; Manning, Alan; Salomons, Anna (2009). "Job Polarization in Europe". The American Economic Review. 99 (2): 58–63. doi:10.1257/aer.99.2.58. JSTOR   25592375.
  33. ↑ Goos, Maarten; Manning, Alan; Salomons, Anna (2014). "Explaining Job Polarization: Routine-Biased Technological Change and Offshoring". American Economic Review. 104 (8): 2509–2526. doi:10.1257/aer.104.8.2509. S2CID   32890608.
  34. ↑ Algan, Yann; Dustmann, Christian; Glitz, Albrecht; Manning, Alan (2010). "The Economic Situation of First and Second‐Generation Immigrants in France, Germany and the United Kingdom". The Economic Journal. 120 (542): F4–F30. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02338.x . S2CID   18592276.
  35. ↑ Manning, Alan; Roy, Sanchari (2010). "Culture Clash or Culture Club? National Identity in Britain". The Economic Journal. 120 (542): F72–F100. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02335.x. S2CID   154180076.
  36. ↑ Manacorda, Marco; Manning, Alan; Wadsworth, Jonathan (2012). "The Impact of Immigration on the Structure of Wages: Theory and Evidence from Britain". Journal of the European Economic Association. 10: 120–151. doi:10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01049.x. S2CID   13921268.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.