Alberta coal policy controversy

Last updated

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

The Alberta Court of Appeal has granted the Municipal District of Ranchland leave to appeal the AER's decision, indicating that there are serious, arguable issues with the regulator's interpretation of coal development regulations. [3] Meanwhile, the government has initiated consultations with industry players on implementing the new coal regulations. [50] [51] The ongoing controversy highlights broader tensions between economic development, environmental protection, and government transparency in Alberta's resource sector.

Status of GMCP as an "advanced project"

Energy Minister Brian Jean has asserted that once a project is classified as advanced, it retains that status regardless of previous rejections, stating, "Once a project is considered an advanced project it remains as one". [31] This position is supported by the AER, which indicates that a letter from the minister carries significant weight in guiding their decisions. [31] [64]

Contents

However, legal experts, including Nigel Bankes from the University of Calgary, argue that the original project is effectively "legally dead" due to its previous denials and should not be considered for new applications. [64] [30]

The situation has escalated with public hearings taking place to assess Northback's proposal amidst considerable opposition from environmental groups and local residents concerned about potential impacts on land and water resources. [65] Additionally, the Alberta Court of Appeal is set to hear arguments regarding whether Northback's application should be allowed to proceed under the current legal framework. [30]

The legality of Northback's proposal hinges on interpretations of regulatory definitions and past decisions. [25] While the Alberta government and AER maintain that it qualifies as an advanced project, significant opposition and legal challenges suggest that this classification may be contested in court. The outcome will depend on judicial interpretations of regulatory authority and the implications of previous denials. [66] [67] [68] [3]

There are a number of legal challenges related to coal mining in Alberta—both for and against policies and projects. In 2021, both provincial and federal regulators rejected the proposal for an open-pit mine, citing significant environmental concerns, particularly regarding the Oldman River watershed. [8] [25] Despite this setback, Rinehart has persistently sought to overturn the decision. [25]

Rinehart through her company's subsidiary, Northback has initiated multiple lawsuits against Alberta and federal governments, challenging regulatory processes. [47]

Lawsuits submitted by coal companies and their supporters

Northback filed its first lawsuit against the federal and Alberta governments in June 2024.

Nigel Bankes, professor emeritus of law at the University of Calgary, said that the Alberta government had created an "open season for coal development" which would possible "knock[...] the foundation out" from these lawsuits. [3]

First Nations supporting GMCP

The Stoney Nakodaconsisting of three First Nationsand Piikani, signatories to Treaty 7, on whose land the GMCP is located, challenged the federal government's 2021 denials of the project. If the project proceeds the Stoney Nakoda and Piikani Nations would receive "project-specific economic and social benefits" from Benga through confidential impact benefit agreements they entered into with Benga. [69]

Lawsuits submitted by coal mine opposition

There are a number of legal challenges related to Grassy Mountain. [70] [71] [72] [73] The Municipal District of Ranchland's appeal against the Alberta Energy Regulator's decision to accept Northback Holdings' applications for exploration permits. [74] [30] Benga Mining Limited (now Northback Holdings) and two First Nations' judicial review applications of the federal decisions rejecting the project. [75] There was an appeal before the Alberta Court of Appeal regarding the definition of an "advanced coal project" and the Energy Minister's influence on the AER's decision. [76]

Ongoing litigation by Benga/Northback, Piikani Nation, and Stoney Nakoda Nations seek to overturn the provincial decisions that denied approval for the project. [77] [78]

The Federal Court case involving three applications for judicial review of the federal government's refusal to issue environmental assessment approvals. [78]

Key issues

Environmental concerns

Coal mining in the Eastern Slopes of the Rocky Mountains poses significant threats to the water supply, impacting both water quality and quantity. [10] Open-pit coal mining leaches toxic elements, particularly selenium, into water sources. As of 2025, there is no proven effective method exists to prevent this contamination. [10] [79] Concerns about water pollution include the fact that open-pit coal mining leaches toxic elements, particularly selenium, into water sources. [26] [80] Selenium contamination causes deformities, nerve damage, and reproductive failure in fish, mammals, and migratory birds. [10] Coal mining operations require large amounts of water, potentially diverting it from other uses. [26] [5]. This could lead to water shortages for farmers, ranchers, and communities, especially during drought years. [10] [81] The Eastern Slopes are the headwaters for major rivers that supply water to millions across Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba. [10] [80] Contamination could affect drinking water, food production, recreation, and ecosystems throughout the Prairies. [10] [80] Toxic tailings from mining pose substantial risks to long-term consequences for downstream environments. [80] Once selenium is released into water, it is extremely difficult to mitigate its effects on water quality and aquatic ecosystem health. [79] Tailing dam failures, though rare, can have extreme impacts on downstream water quality. [79] Air-borne contaminants from mining activities can affect residents and communities far from mine sites. [81] [82]

Stranded assets

Both the 2021 Joint Review Panel and the University of Calgary Public Policy paper submitted to the Alberta Coal Policy Committee suggest that the risk of stranded assets arises from the potential for declining coal prices, the practice of extracting the best ore first, and the possibility that companies may become insolvent or unable to meet reclamation obligations. This can lead to financial liabilities being transferred to the public, particularly in the form of reclamation costs. As with orphan well where the province is struggling with billions of dollars in environmental liabilities, and the Grassy Mountain project could add to these financial burdens, which would be passed on to future generations. The JRP cited concerns of the Livingstone Landowners Group cautioned that under basic corporate law, a parent and subsidiary are different companies, and that the parent is not liable for the subsidiary's debts and obligations. In the Grassy Mountain Coal Project, for example there is risk that Northback Holdings would not take financial responsibility for stranded assets. [29] [14]

Political debate

Blair Painter, who is mayor the municipality of Crowsnest Pass, supports the GMCP. [31]

Landowners and ranchers in the area affected are against the project. This includes the Livingstone Landowners Group. [31] The Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society have submitted a brief to the JPR and are considered legal action. [14] [31]

The Council of Canadians raised concerns that the GMCP poses significant risks to Canada's environment, Indigenous communities, and human health. [26]

See also

Notes

  1. The Grassy Mountain Coal Project (GMCP) project was originally proposed by Benga Mining Limited, which was a wholly-owned subsidiary of Riversdale Resources. In 2019, the Australian mining magnate, Gina Rinehart—one of Australia's wealthiest individuals—through her company Hancock Prospecting, acquired Riversdale Resources for $700 million CDN, including the GMCP. Riversdale Resources/Benga Mining officially changed its name to Northback Holdings Corp. in July 2023. Therefore, the project initially advanced under Benga Mining/Riversdale Resources, and is now being pursued by Northback Holdings Corp., both ultimately owned by Gina Rinehart.

References

  1. 1 2 UoC n.d.
  2. 1 2 CPAWS 2023a.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Farrell & Johnson 2025.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 Fletcher, Anderson & Omstead 2020.
  5. 1 2 3 4 Whelan 2020.
  6. Graveland 2024.
  7. 1 2 3 Martin 2022a.
  8. 1 2 3 4 Cook 2024.
  9. 1 2 Nikiforuk 2024.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Brubaker 2021a.
  11. Nikiforuk, Andrew (August 12, 2020). "Alberta's Environment Minister Cheered on Coal Mining in New Areas Before Restrictions Were Dropped". The Tyee. Retrieved April 26, 2025.
  12. 1 2 John T. Boyd Company (November 22, 2019). Ram River Coal Corp (PDF) (Report). Retrieved April 26, 2025.
  13. Riversdale Resources 2019.
  14. 1 2 3 4 5 Joint Review Panel 2021.
  15. van Tighem 2019.
  16. 1 2 3 4 CPAWS NAB 2023.
  17. 1 2 Aldrich 2022.
  18. 1 2 AER 2021.
  19. Fletcher 2023a.
  20. Maclean 2021.
  21. IAAC 2021.
  22. Ziaee 2021.
  23. Secord 2021.
  24. 1 2 3 Fletcher 2023.
  25. 1 2 3 4 CPAWS 2021.
  26. 1 2 3 4 Brubaker 2021.
  27. Stephenson 2023.
  28. CPAWS 2021a.
  29. 1 2 3 4 Winter, Bailey & Galley 2021.
  30. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Dryden 2024.
  31. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Weber 2024.
  32. Ministerial Order 2022.
  33. CPAWS 2022.
  34. CPAWS 2022a.
  35. Gridneff & Smyth 2025.
  36. 1 2 Bakx 2025.
  37. Martin 2022.
  38. Nikiforuk 2023.
  39. Smith 2024.
  40. Niehaus 2023.
  41. Truscott 2023.
  42. 1 2 3 4 Mining 2023.
  43. 1 2 NAMM 2023.
  44. "Coal Industry Modernization Initiative". Alberta.ca. April 25, 2025. Retrieved April 27, 2025.
  45. AWA 2024.
  46. Scott & Savard 2025.
  47. 1 2 3 Nikiforuk 2025.
  48. George B. Cuff 2009.
  49. AMA 2021.
  50. 1 2 3 4 Johnson 2024.
  51. 1 2 3 Ranger 2024.
  52. 1 2 3 Dryden 2025.
  53. Mining Technology 2025.
  54. Rieger 2025.
  55. Dryden 2025b.
  56. 1 2 3 CPAWS 2025.
  57. 1 2 3 Farrell 2025.
  58. Seskus & Fletcher 2020.
  59. Global News 2025.
  60. Canadian Press 2025.
  61. Cooke et al. 2025, p. 126841.
  62. 1 2 Beeber 2025.
  63. "Announcement: August 21, 2025". Alberta Energy Regulator. August 21, 2025. Retrieved August 26, 2025.
  64. 1 2 Canadian Press 2024.
  65. MacGillivray & Prentice 2025.
  66. CPAWS 2025a.
  67. McKay 2025.
  68. Northback 2024.
  69. Fasken 2024.
  70. Weber 2024a.
  71. Bankes 2024.
  72. Niven & Custer 2024.
  73. Wilson 2025.
  74. Alberta Wilderness 2025.
  75. Weber 2024b.
  76. Alberta Wilderness 2024.
  77. Cherkawsky & Dingman 2024.
  78. 1 2 Nikiforuk 2024a.
  79. 1 2 3 Gervais 2021.
  80. 1 2 3 4 CPAWS 2023.
  81. 1 2 Livingston Landowners n.d.
  82. Wildsight 2024.

Citations

A

B

C

D

F

G

I

J

L

M

N

R

S

T

V

W

Z

Further reading