This article contains wording that promotes the subject in a subjective manner without imparting real information.(November 2024) |
Anjali Sharma (born 2004) is an Australian climate activist who was the lead litigant in a class action in the Australian Federal Court, against the Federal government, and the then Minister for the Environment Sussan Ley for failing to consider the impacts of climate change. Sharma was also a finalist in the 2021 Children's Climate Prize, an International prize for climate activism, based in Sweden.
Anjali Sharma | |
---|---|
Born | 2004 Delhi, India |
Nationality | Indian-Australian |
Occupation | Climate activist |
Sharma was a high school student from Melbourne, who took the Australian federal government, and Minister for the Environment at the time, Sussan Ley, to the Federal Court of Australia in a class action. She was the lead litigant, together with seven other school students, and a nun, Sister Marie Brigid Arthur. The class action asked the Federal Court to stop Minister for the Environment at the time, Ley, from approving an expansion to the coalmine Vickery, near Gunnedah, in NSW. The Federal Court ruled, in a world first, that the Minister for the Environment was required to have a duty of care towards teenagers and children, with respect to climate change impacts, and in particular bushfire and heatwave impacts. This set a precedent for following court cases. [1] During the Sharma and others vs Minister for the Environment case, the science of climate change, and in particular that human emissions of CO2 are "largely responsible" for climate change and warming of the Earth's surface was undisputed. Also undisputed was that Australia will experience more drought, heatwave extremes and fire related weather. Further, it was undisputed that these effects and their extent will be influenced by the extent of greenhouse gases emitted. [2]
The Court of Justice, Justice Mordecai Bromberg, ruled that the Minister for the Environment had a "duty of care" to not harm the youth or their future. He ruled that the Minister had "a duty to take reasonable care to avoid causing personal injury" to youth and children of Australia, when the Minister for the Environment, made a decision about the extension of the coal mining project under the legislation, Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act [1999]. [3] The aim, as stated by the teenagers, was to stop or prevent the expansion of future fossil fuel projects in the future. [4]
The eight Australian teenagers who brought the class action were Anjali Sharma, Isolde Shanti Raj-Seppings, Ambrose Malachy Hayes, Tomas Webster Arbizu, Bella Paige Burgemeister, Laura Fleck Kirwan, Ava Princi and Luca Gwyther Saunders. [5] Due to the young age of the applicants, all under 18, they were represented by a litigation representative, Sister Marie Brigid Arthur, a sister of the Brigadine Order of Victoria. [6]
Sharma's actions and court case are likely to set legal precedent in future court cases in Australia where the impact of climate change, including death and injury from heat waves, bushfire and storms, need to be considered in coal and fossil fuel mining decisions. [7] Sharma's case was one of many as part of the 'legal surge' in climate action cases, where the US and Australia lead the number of climate action court cases, with many being led by teenagers. [8] [9] [10] As at December 2021, there were 21 court cases involving climate change, including the Sharma and others vs the Minister for the Environment appeal case. [11]
An expanded explanation of Sharma and others vs Minister for the Environment reported that the Court issued a declaration that "the Minister has a reasonable duty to avoid causing death or injury to person's who were under 18 years of age and ordinarily resident in Australia at the time of the commencement of this proceeding arising from emissions of carbon dioxide into the Earth’s atmosphere." [12]
In March 2022, it was reported that the Australian government won an appeal against the ruling and hence overturned the case. [13]
Writing in The Guardian in April 2022, just prior to the general election, Sharma tackled the lack of political will in Australia: "[W]ith 114 new fossil fuel projects in the pipeline, and a two-party system with deeply ingrained ties to big coal and gas, what our major parties are promising is the exact opposite [of a satisfactory response]". [14]
Sharma's case, the implications for climate change, the youth of the team of the class action, and the historic precedent set by the results, have received much media and legal attention, [15] [16] within Australian, Indian, and British media outlets. [17] [18] [19] Her case has been reported on, by SBS, [20] the Sydney Morning Herald, [21] the Guardian, [22] and The Australian. [23] The case may be considered as a precedent to inform other cases where climate change impacts are considered. [24]
[ peacock prose ]
Sharma's work led to the conclusion that, within Australian law, the Minister for the Environment has a duty to avoid causing personal injury and death to Australian children from carbon emissions which can lead to heatwaves and bushfires, when approving coal projects. [25] Sharma's activism led to her being nominated as a finalist in Children's climate prize. This is an "international prize annually awarded to young people who have made extraordinary efforts for the climate and environment." [26] [27]
Her story and activism was covered by Australian Story, in the ABC. Sharma has also written about climate change and the need for action for the Sydney Morning Herald. [28]
Sharma worked with Independent Senator David Pockock who introduced a Bill called the Climate Change Amendment (Duty of Care and Intergenerational Equity) Bill. The purpose of Bill aimed at compelling the Federal Government to take into consideration the health of young people when approving developments, in particular mining or fossil fuel developments, and proposals which have the potential to release greenhouse gases. [29]
2021 | Children's Climate Prize, finalist [30] |
2021 | Women's Agenda Top 10 Women that lifted us in 2021 |
2022 | Victorian Honour Roll of Women: Emerging leader [31] |
2023 | Women's Agenda Emerging Leader in Climate Action [32] |
Gregory Andrew Hunt is an Australian former politician who was the Minister for Health between January 2017 and May 2022. He was a Liberal Party member of the House of Representatives between November 2001 and 2022, representing the Division of Flinders in Victoria. He has previously served as a parliamentary secretary in the Howard government (2004–2007), Minister for the Environment (2013–2016), Minister for Industry, Innovation and Science (2016–2017), and Minister for Sport (2017).
Sussan Penelope Ley is an Australian politician who has been deputy leader of the Liberal Party and Deputy Leader of the Opposition since May 2022. She has been member of parliament (MP) for the New South Wales seat of Farrer since 2001 and was a cabinet minister in the Abbott, Turnbull and Morrison governments.
Earthjustice is a nonprofit public interest organization based in the United States dedicated to litigating environmental issues. Headquartered in San Francisco, they have an international program, a communications team, and a policy and legislation team in Washington, D.C., along with 14 regional offices across the United States.
The Australian Conservation Foundation (ACF) is Australia's national environmental organisation, launched in 1965 in response to a proposal by the World Wide Fund for Nature for a more co-ordinated approach to sustainability.
Mordecai "Mordy" Bromberg SC is an Australian judge who was appointed to the Federal Court of Australia in 2009 and as President of the Australian Law Reform Commission in 2023. He was previously a senior barrister, and in his youth also played four seasons of Australian rules football for the St Kilda Football Club.
The Minister for Climate Change and Energy is a portfolio in the Government of Australia. The current Minister is Chris Bowen. The minister administers his or her portfolios through the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water.
Environmental Defenders Office (EDO) is an Australian NGO that encourages, funds, and provides lawyers and legal support for litigation, law reform, and community engagement on climate change and environmental issues. EDO formed in late 2019 with the merger of eight separate state and territory organisations into one national organisation. Topics of interest to EDO include: climate change, biodiversity, water, and healthy communities.
Climate change has resulted in an increase in temperature of 2.3 °C (4.14 °F) (2022) in Europe compared to pre-industrial levels. Europe is the fastest warming continent in the world. Europe's climate is getting warmer due to anthropogenic activity. According to international climate experts, global temperature rise should not exceed 2 °C to prevent the most dangerous consequences of climate change; without reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, this could happen before 2050. Climate change has implications for all regions of Europe, with the extent and nature of impacts varying across the continent.
The Environmental Defenders Office (Qld) Inc. was a non-profit, non-government Community Legal Centre which was established in 1989. and is one of nine independent Environmental Defenders Offices located across Australia which collaborated in a loose network known as the EDOs of Australia.
Melissa Lee Price is an Australian politician who served as Minister for Defence Industry from 2019 to 2022 and as Minister for Science and Technology from 2021 to 2022 in the Morrison government. She has been a member of the House of Representatives since 2013, representing the Division of Durack in Western Australia. A member of the Liberal Party, she previously served as Minister for the Environment (2018–2019) and Assistant Minister for the Environment (2017–2018).
The Carmichael coal mine is a coal mine in Queensland, Australia, owned by the Adani Group's Australian subsidiary Bravus Mining & Resources. It was approved by the government in 2014 and has been operational since December 2021. The mine was initially planned to produce 60 million tonnes of coal per year; however, funding difficulties resulted in downsizing the planned mine to produce 10 million tonnes per year. Construction of the mine started in June 2019, and on 29 December 2021 the first coal shipment from the Carmichael Mine was ready for export.
Droughts and heatwaves are the main hazards due to the climate of Turkey getting hotter. The temperature has risen by more than 1.5 °C (2.7 °F), and there is more extreme weather.
Climate change is leading to long-term impacts on agriculture in Germany, more intense heatwaves and coldwaves, flash and coastal flooding, and reduced water availability. Debates over how to address these long-term challenges caused by climate change have also sparked changes in the energy sector and in mitigation strategies. Germany's energiewende has been a significant political issue in German politics that has made coalition talks difficult for Angela Merkel's CDU.
Juliana, et al. v. United States of America, et al. was a climate-related lawsuit filed in 2015 and dismissed in 2020. Filed by 21 youth plaintiffs against the United States and several executive branch officials. Filing their case in the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, the plaintiffs, represented by the non-profit organization Our Children's Trust, include Xiuhtezcatl Martinez, the members of Martinez's organization Earth Guardians, and climatologist James Hansen as a "guardian for future generations". Some fossil fuel and industry groups initially intervened as defendants but later requested to be dropped following the 2016 presidential election, stating that the case would be well defended under the new administration.
Climate change litigation, also known as climate litigation, is an emerging body of environmental law using legal practice to set case law precedent to further climate change mitigation efforts from public institutions, such as governments and companies. Finding that climate change politics provides insufficient climate change mitigation for their tastes, activists and lawyers have increased efforts to use national and international judiciary systems to advance the effort. Climate litigation typically engages in one of five types of legal claims: Constitutional law, administrative law, private law, fraud or consumer protection, or human rights.
Our Children's Trust is an American nonprofit public interest law firm based in Oregon that has filed several lawsuits on behalf of youth plaintiffs against state and federal governments, arguing that they are infringing on the youths' rights to a safe climate system.
Urgenda FoundationvState of the Netherlands (2019) is climate change litigation heard by the Supreme Court of the Netherlands related to government efforts to curtail carbon dioxide emissions. The case was brought against the Dutch government in 2013, arguing the government, by not meeting a minimum carbon dioxide emission-reduction goal established by scientists to avert harmful climate change, was endangering the human rights of Dutch citizens as set by national and European Union laws.
Brigid Arthur, csb, also known as Marie Brigid Arthur, and Marie Therese/a Arthur, is an Australian Brigidine sister, educator, refugee advocate and activist on social issues.
Tessa Khan is an environmental lawyer who lives in the United Kingdom. She co-founded and is co-director of the Climate Litigation Network, which supports legal cases related to climate change mitigation and climate justice.
Milieudefensie v Royal Dutch Shell (2021) is a human rights law and tort law case heard by the district court of The Hague in the Netherlands in 2021 related to efforts by several NGO's to curtail carbon dioxide emissions by multinational corporations. It was brought by the Dutch branch of Friends of the Earth and a group of other NGO's against the oil corporation, Shell plc. In May 2021, the court ordered Shell to reduce its global carbon emissions from its 2019 levels by 45% by 2030, relating not only to the emissions from its operations, but also those from the products it sells. It is considered to be the first major climate change litigation ruling against a corporation.