Aulus Didius Gallus Fabricius Veiento was a Romansenator who played a major role in the courts of several Roman emperors during the first century AD. For his usefulness,Veiento was rewarded with the office of suffect consul three times in a period when three consulates were very rare for non-members of the Imperial family.
Modern authorities have interpreted the nature of Veiento's role in different ways. Older writers,following the insinuations of Cassius Dio and Pliny the Younger,tended to ascribe to Veiento a malevolent role. For example,Ronald Syme summarized his career in this sentence:"Veiento began as a dealer in petty patronage,and he ended as a merchant of honor."[1] William C. McDermott has since provided a more balanced evaluation of this figure.[2] This has led more recent writers to evaluate him as "one of the most interesting of his Domitian's senatorial amici,frequently but erroneously classified as an informer during the so-called reign of terror."[3]
Life
His name suggests that Veiento was related to Aulus Didius Gallus,suffect consul of AD 39 and governor of Roman Britain. Some experts,such as Edmund Groag and Mario Torelli,thought that Veiento was the son or grandson of the governor of Britain. Olli Salomies has shown that it is more likely that Veiento was adopted by Didius Gallus at some point before Veiento became praetor.[4]
Jones speculates that it was while he was with Didius Gallus that he first met the future emperors,"for Domitian's father and brother commanded two of Claudius's legions in the British invasions."[3]
Career under Nero
An action Veiento took while praetor is his first certain appearance in history. According to Dio Cassius,the emperor Nero's favor of charioteers and horsekeepers had led them to make unreasonable demands. In response,Veiento replaced them with chariots drawn by trained dogs.[5] This led Brian W. Jones to describe him as "one of the earliest known strike-breakers."[3]
However,the year Veiento was praetor is not fixed. S. J. de Laet proposed 41;[6] McDermott believed he was praetor in 54;[7] Jones in 1971 pointed out that "there is nothing to prevent its being dated to around 60,to some time towards the end of the Quinquennium Neronis",[6] although in a later publication admitted that 54 was "possible".[3] If Veiento reached the rank of praetor at the legal age of 30,[8] and we accept McDermott's date of 54 as when he held it,then we can deduce Veiento was born around the year AD 24.
His next appearance in history is in 62,when he was tried and exiled. Tacitus tells the story:
A similar accusation caused the downfall of Fabricius Veiento. He had composed many libels on senators and pontiffs in a work to which he gave the title of "Codicils." Tullius Geminus,the prosecutor,further stated that he had habitually trafficked in the emperor's favours and in the right of promotion. This was Nero's reason for himself undertaking the trial,and having convicted Veiento,he banished him from Italy,and ordered the burning of his books,which,while it was dangerous to procure them,were anxiously sought and much read. Soon full freedom for their possession caused their oblivion.[9]
McDermott notes,"At first glance this seems to be denigration of Veiento,but a closer look at the passage and its context reveals Veiento in a very different light."[10] McDermott points out the context of this passage —the preceding chapters narrate the recrudescence of charges under the Lex Julia maiestatis,or treason —suggests the motivation of this prosecution was not Veiento's "Codicils",instead an excuse to confiscate his property. McDermott also notes that what Tacitus says here is not that Veiento sold "the emperor's favours and . . . the right of promotion",but that Tullius Geminus accused Veiento of this. "Such fictitious additions to the central charge of maiestas laesa were common," McDermott reminds us.[11] Veiento was more the victim of court intrigue than the agent of it.
Career under Vespasian
Obviously Veiento returned from exile following the suicide of Nero in 68. He found favor with Vespasian through means unknown,but it resulted in his first suffect consulship.[12] The date of his consulship may be as early as Vespasian's reign when he first became amicus Caesaris and a member of the consilium principis.[13] He was clearly favored by Vespasian's son Titus,for his second suffect consulship was in 80.
Here Veiento's career appears to be anomalous,for there is no certain record of a cursus honorum. McDermott identifies him as the subject of a fragmentary inscription found at Arles,[14] and his restoration of this inscription,which he admits is speculative in places,shows he was governor of three provinces (one of which was either Asia or Africa),as well as legate of an unknown legion —which would supply Veiento with a conventional career.[15] Although Gallivan accepts the identification,[16] other experts have yet to accept the provinces McDermott proposes for Veiento. In a response to McDermott's paper,Brian Jones asserted "there is no evidence to suggest that Quintus Vibius Crispus could not have held the offices which the inscription mentions."[17] Further,Werner Eck offers a different restoration of the first line and argues that the inscription pertains to Marcus Pompeius Silvanus Staberius Flavianus.[18]
Copy of the votive inscription by Veiento and his wife Attica. (CILXIII,7253)
Veiento's career in the Roman priesthood is far better documented. A votive inscription of Trajanic date recording Veiento's satisfaction of a vow to the goddess Nemetona in Moguntiacum (Mainz) attests to the priesthoods he held.[19] These offices are listed as follows:Quindecimviri sacris faciundis,one of the four most prestigious ancient Roman priesthoods;Sodales Augustales;Sodales Flaviales;and Sodales Titialis. McDermott dates his membership in the Quindecimviri "possibly under Nero before his exile in 62. He may even have become a member while his adoptive father was still alive." When he became Sodales Augustales and Sodales Titialis is not known. Entrance to the Sodales Flaviales obviously should be dated soon after Vespasian's death.[20]
Not only may this explain his dominance in Domitian's reign,for the emperor is known to have been interested in the minutiae of religion,but McDermott explains it may explain the point of Veiento's "Codicils" as an attack on the "levity and inattention to rituals" of his peers.[21]
There is also evidence that Veiento accompanied Domitian on his Dacian campaign against the Chatti.[24] Jones explains the context of the bronze tablet found at Moguntiacum due to his presence as Domitian's comes,and speculates that Veiento may have been sent to the commanders there to explain Domitian's strategy,that "must have seemed close to cowardice to most of them" yet was as effective as the Fabian strategy against Hannibal.[25]
Lastly,it was under Domitian when Veiento was appointed consul a third time,which experts believe was in 83.[26]
Career under Nerva
Veiento evidently survived the assassination of Domitian without loss of rank or property,for he next appears in history at a banquet hosted by the emperor Nerva during the first year of his reign (AD 97). Pliny the Younger recounts how Veiento had been invited to the same dinner as Junius Mauricus,who had been exiled due to the efforts of a delator or informer.[27] The blind Lucius Valerius Catullus Messalinus,who had been a notorious delator during his lifetime,was mentioned,and the emperor mused,"If he had gone on living,what do you think would have become of him?" Junius Mauricus replied,"He would be dining with us." Pliny elsewhere in his letter makes it clear the comment was directed at Veiento.
The other incident recorded by Pliny is when Veiento,[28] joined with four other ex-consuls and senators to oppose Pliny's motion to prosecute another delator,Publicius Certus,who had brought down Helvidius Priscus in 93. Despite the fact Pliny was almost alone in pursuing the matter,through his eloquence he convinced the Senate to approve the prosecution,despite a final plea against legal actions from Veiento. While the emperor Nerva failed to act on the motion to prosecute,Certus was passed over in consideration for a consulship,and in any event fell ill and died soon after this session of the Senate.
These two anecdotes have led many writers —such as Syme above —to infer that Veiento himself was an informer who accused many prominent men of crimes in order to seize their wealth;as McDermott points out,all these passages prove is that the Younger Pliny greatly disliked Veiento. McDermott notes that Tacitus,who was a member of the Quindecimviri sacris faciundis like Veiento,and either knew the man well,or knew of him,did not consider Veiento a delator. When offering a list of delatores active under Domitian,Tacitus names Mettius Carus,the blind Catullus Messalinus,and Baebius Massa,but not Veiento.[29]
Veiento's last recorded act is on the Senate floor in 97,pleading leniency for Publicius Certus. How much longer he lived is unknown:assuming our above calculation of AD 24 for his birthdate is correct,then Veiento was about 73 at the time of his last appearance. McDermott mentions an allusion in Pliny's Panegyric to the emperor Trajan (delivered 100) to a man sitting in the Senate who had been consul three times,and wonders if it was Veiento;[30] based on our calculations,this is plausible for he would have been 76 years old at the time.
Family
From the bronze tablet found at Moguntiacum,we know the name of Veiento's wife,Attica. Nothing certain is known of her. Juvenal[31] makes a puzzling allusion to Eppia,the wife of a senator,who deserts her husband and family and follows a gladiator to Egypt;the senator might be Veiento. "Is Eppia the wife of Veiento whose name was Attica (both names are dactyls),or is Veiento merely a type of senex?" McDermott asks. He cannot determine whether the senator is actually the three-time consul,and if so,whether Eppia is a cover name for Attica,or perhaps the name of a second wife.[32]
Related Research Articles
Helvidius Priscus,Stoic philosopher and statesman,lived during the reigns of Nero,Galba,Otho,Vitellius and Vespasian.
When Vespasian sent for Helvidius Priscus and commanded him not to go into the senate,he replied,"It is in your power not to allow me to be a member of the senate,but so long as I am,I must go in." "Well,go in then," says the emperor,"but say nothing." "Do not ask my opinion,and I will be silent." "But I must ask your opinion." "And I must say what I think right." "But if you do,I shall put you to death." "When then did I tell you that I am immortal? You will do your part,and I will do mine:it is your part to kill;it is mine to die,but not in fear:yours to banish me;mine to depart without sorrow." Epictetus,Discourses,1.2.19–21
Quintus Pompeius Falco was a Roman senator and general of the early 2nd century AD. He was governor of several provinces,most notably Roman Britain,where he hosted a visit to the province by the Emperor Hadrian in the last year. Falco achieved the rank of suffect consul for the nundinium of September to December 108 with Marcus Titius Lustricus Bruttianus as his colleague.
The gens Didia,or Deidia,as the name is spelled on coins,was a plebeian family at ancient Rome,which first appears in history during the final century of the Republic. According to Cicero,they were novi homines. Titus Didius obtained the consulship in 98 BC,a dignity shared by no other Didii until imperial times.
Quintus Junius Arulenus Rusticus was a Roman Senator and a friend and follower of Thrasea Paetus,and like him an ardent admirer of Stoic philosophy. Arulenus Rusticus attained a suffect consulship in the nundinium of September to December 92 with Gaius Julius Silanus as his colleague. He was one of a group of Stoics who opposed the perceived tyranny and autocratic tendencies of certain emperors,known today as the Stoic Opposition.
Marcus Arrecinus Clemens,was a prefect of the Praetorian Guard during the reign of Vespasian. In return for his faithful service,Clemens was promoted to other important positions,including being twice consul and urban prefect of Rome.
Gaius Julius Cornutus Tertullus was a Roman senator who was active during the late 1st and early 2nd centuries. He is best known as the older friend of Pliny the Younger,with whom Cornutus was suffect consul for the nundinium of September to October 100.
Lucius Junius Quintus Vibius Crispus was a Roman senator and amicus or companion of the Emperors,known for his wit. He was a three-time suffect consul.
Lucius Aelius Lamia Plautius Aelianus was a Roman senator.
Pompeius Silvanus,fully Marcus Pompeius Silvanus Staberius Flavinus or Flavianus,was a Roman senator who was consul twice.
Lucius Tettius Julianus was a Roman general who held a number of imperial appointments during the Flavian dynasty. He was suffect consul for the nundinium of May–June 83 with Terentius Strabo Erucius Homullus as his colleague.
Plotius Grypus was a partisan of the Roman emperor Vespasian. He was the brother of the urban prefect Plotius Pegasus,and likely father of the identically named Plotius Grypus. The elder Grypus acceded to the suffect consulship for the period 13 January to April 88,succeeding the emperor Domitian.
Marcus Cornelius Nigrinus Curiatius Maternus was a Roman senator and general during the reign of Domitian. He was suffect consul during the nundinium of September to October AD 83 with Lucius Calventius Sextius Carminius Vetus. Although some experts consider him a rival with Trajan as heir apparent to the emperor Nerva,he is primarily known from inscriptions.
Lucius Valerius Catullus Messalinus was a Roman senator during the Flavian dynasty,and is best known as the most hated and ruthless delator or informer of his age. He was feared all the more due to his blindness.
Quintus Julius Cordinus Gaius Rutilius Gallicus was a Roman senator who held several posts in the emperor's service. He was twice suffect consul:for the first time in the nundinium of September to October 70 AD;and the second time in 85 with Lucius Valerius Catullus Messalinus as his colleague,succeeding the Emperor Domitian.
Gaius Calpetanus Rantius Quirinalis Valerius Festus was a Roman senator,general,and amicus to each of the Flavian emperors. He proved his value to the Flavians when,as legatus legionis,or commander,of Legio III Augusta stationed in Africa,he assassinated the proconsul,who favored a rival of Vespasian during the Year of Four Emperors. He maintained his loyalty through the reigns of his sons Titus and Domitian,but fell out of favor during the latter's reign and was forced to commit suicide.
Quintus Corellius Rufus was a Roman senator who flourished during the second half of the first century;he was suffect consul for the nundinium of September–October 78 with Lucius Funisulanus Vettonianus as his colleague. Rufus is best known as a mentor to Pliny the Younger. In several letters Pliny writes warmly of Rufus,noting that he often sought his advice,recounting in one that on his deathbed Rufus told his daughter,"Through the benefit of a longer life I have gained many friends for you,but above all Secundus [Pliny the Younger] and Cornutus."
Quintus Fabius Postuminus was a Roman senator who was suffect consul in the nundinum of May to August 96 with Titus Prifernius as his colleague.
Publius Glitius Gallus was a Roman senator active in the late 1st century AD. He was suffect consul at some yet undetermined nundinium in the first century.
Gaius Terentius Tullius Geminus was a Roman senator of the early Roman Empire,who flourished under the reign of Claudius. He was suffect consul in the nundinium of September-December 46 as the colleague of Marcus Junius Silanus. It is inconclusive if a poet named Tullius Geminus,whose poems are included in the Palatine Anthology is the same man.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
Roman Empire 
