Avro Canada CF-103

Last updated

CF-103
CF 103 Mockup.jpg
CF-103 mock-up at the Avro company
Role Interceptor
Manufacturer Avro Aircraft Limited (Canada)
StatusCancelled December 1951
Primary user Royal Canadian Air Force (intended)
Number built0
Developed from Avro Canada CF-100

The Avro Canada CF-103 was a proposed Canadian interceptor, designed by Avro Canada in the early 1950s as a development, and possible replacement of the company's CF-100 Canuck, that was entering service at the time with the Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF). [1] Although intended to be capable of flying at transonic speeds, the CF-103 only offered a moderate increase in performance and capability over the CF-100; subsequently, the aircraft never progressed beyond the mock-up stage. [2]

Contents

Design and development

Even before the prototype of the CF-100 had flown, Avro Canada was conducting studies of potential advanced variations of the aircraft, [3] as the RCAF was seeking an interceptor with greater high-speed performance. [4] Due to the perceived limitations of the CF-100's original "thick", straight wing, Chief Designer John Frost proposed a series of refinements that included a thinner swept wing. [4] In December 1950, the Avro Aircraft Design Office decided to proceed with a redesign, primarily incorporating the early series CF-100 fuselage structure with a new swept wing and tail surfaces as part of the C-100S design study. [3] [N 1]

Frost considered the new design as an interim aircraft between the CF-100 and the more advanced C-104 project. [3] The salient changes to the basic wing planform were in decreasing its chord and thickness, and adding a 42° sweep to the leading edge, creating a near-delta wing configuration. The tail surfaces were also swept back. [6] One version that was considered featured two streamlined fuel tanks blended into the leading edge of the wings near the three/quarter position. [7] [N 2]

Despite the use of more powerful engines, the redesign had very modest performance specifications, with a planned maximum diving speed of Mach 0.95, scarcely better than the placarded Mach 0.85 speed limit of the production CF-100 Mk 2 and Mk 3. [2] Avro executives, recognizing that the company had already suffered due to the protracted development of the CF-100, determined that Frost's revised design would provide a "hedge" against the CF-100's failure to secure long-term contracts. [7]

In 1951, the Canadian Department of Trade and Commerce issued an order for two prototypes and a static test airframe, under the CF-103 project designation. Jigs, tools and detailed engineering drawings were in place by June 1951, with wind tunnel testing, conducted at Cornell University, completed by November 1951. [3] Although a wooden mock-up of the CF-103 was built, along with a separate cockpit area and engine section that was partially framed in, the mock-up did not feature an undercarriage unit nor any interior fittings. [8] Two different tail designs were fitted with the initial effort only having a swept leading edge of the tail, while the definitive version had a much more raked appearance. [7] The engineering and installation requirements for the CF-103's proposed Orenda 17 jet engines were not finalized, as the experimental "hybrid" using an Orenda 8 compressor unit and Orenda 11 two-stage turbine, matched to a "reheat" unit, had not been fully developed. [N 3]

Cancellation

During 1951, flight tests carried out by Chief Development Test Pilot S/L Janusz Żurakowski and other members of the Flight Test unit, revealed the development potential of the CF-100 had outstripped the intended performance envelope of the CF-103, while Frost and the Design Office became preoccupied with more sophisticated designs as potential replacements for the CF-100. [5] [N 4] Work on the CF-103 stalled, with the maiden flight originally scheduled for the summer of 1952, postponed to mid-1953. [3] With Cold War pressures mounting, the Canadian government demanded that production of the latest CF-100 fighter, as well as developing more advanced variants of the Canuck should predominate, leading the Avro company to curtail the moribund CF-103 project in December 1951. [1] [N 5]

Although the mock-up languished in the experimental bay at the factory, a dramatic event served to preclude any attempt to restart the project. [12] On 18 December 1952, from a height of 33,000 ft (10,000 m), Żurakowski dived the CF-100 Mk 4 prototype (RCAF Serial No. 18112) to Mach 1.06. [6] His "unauthorized" test flight [N 6] resulted in the final scrapping of the mock-up. [14]

Specifications

CF-103: original concept, c. 1950 Avro Canada CF-103 drawing.jpg
CF-103: original concept, c. 1950

Data fromAvro Arrow: The Story of the Avro Arrow from its Evolution to its Extinction [10]

General characteristics

Performance

Armament
Proposed

See also

Related development

Aircraft of comparable role, configuration, and era

Related lists

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Avro Canada CF-105 Arrow</span> Canadian interceptor aircraft family

The Avro Canada CF-105 Arrow was a delta-winged interceptor aircraft designed and built by Avro Canada. The CF-105 held the promise of Mach 2 speeds at altitudes exceeding 50,000 feet (15,000 m) and was intended to serve as the Royal Canadian Air Force's (RCAF) primary interceptor into the 1960s and beyond.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Avro Canada</span> Defunct Canadian aircraft manufacturer

Avro Canada was a Canadian aircraft manufacturing company. It was founded in 1945 as an aircraft plant and within 13 years became the third-largest company in Canada, one of the largest 100 companies in the world, and directly employing over 50,000. Avro Canada was best known for the CF-105 Arrow, but through growth and acquisition, it rapidly became a major, integrated company that had diverse holdings.

The Velvet Glove was a short-range semi-active radar homing air-to-air missile designed by CARDE and produced by Canadair starting in 1953. 131 Velvet Gloves had been completed when the program was terminated in 1956, officially because of concerns about its ability to be launched at supersonic speeds from the Avro Arrow then under design, but also from the design being overtaken by developments in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Avro Canada C102 Jetliner</span> Canadian prototype jet airliner built by Avro Canada

The Avro Canada C102 Jetliner was a Canadian prototype medium-range turbojet-powered jet airliner built by Avro Canada in 1949. It was beaten to the air by only 13 days by the de Havilland Comet, thereby becoming the second purpose-built jet airliner in the world, while both were preceded by the Nene Lancastrian, and the Nene Viking, both of which were conversions of piston engine airliners. The name "Jetliner" was chosen as a shortening of the term "jet airliner", a term which is still in popular usage. The aircraft was considered suitable for busy routes along the US eastern seaboard and garnered intense interest, notably from Howard Hughes who even offered to start production under license. However, continued delays in Avro Canada's all-weather interceptor project, the CF-100 Canuck, led to an order to stop working on the project in 1951, with the prototype Jetliner later cut up for scrap.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Janusz Żurakowski</span> Russian-Polish-British-Canadian fighter and test pilot

Janusz Żurakowski was a Polish fighter and test pilot. At various times in his life he lived and worked in Poland, the United Kingdom, and Canada.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Avro Canada CF-100 Canuck</span> Interceptor aircraft in service 1952-1981

The Avro Canada CF-100 Canuck is a Canadian twinjet interceptor/fighter designed and produced by aircraft manufacturer Avro Canada. It has the distinction of being the only Canadian-designed fighter to enter mass production.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">McDonnell CF-101 Voodoo</span> Jet fighter aircraft

The McDonnell CF-101 Voodoo was an all-weather interceptor aircraft operated by the Royal Canadian Air Force and the Canadian Forces between 1961 and 1984. They were manufactured by the McDonnell Aircraft Corporation of St. Louis, Missouri for the United States Air Force, and later sold to Canada. CF-101s replaced the obsolete Avro CF-100 Canuck in the RCAF's all-weather fighter squadrons. The Voodoo's primary armament was nuclear AIR-2A Genie unguided air-to-air rockets, and there was significant political controversy in Canada about their adoption. Although they never fired a weapon in wartime, the CF-101 served as Canada's primary means of air defence from Quick Reaction Alert facilities at Canadian airbases. The CF-101s were retired in the 1980s and replaced with McDonnell Douglas CF-18 Hornet fighters. Many examples are preserved in museums and parks in Canada and the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Crawford Gordon Jr.</span> Canadian businessman

Crawford Gordon Jr. was a leader of wartime defence production in Canada under Minister of Munitions and Supply C.D. Howe during the Second World War. He was perhaps one of the greatest industrialists and business minds in Canadian history; Gordon bought two companies and held one CEO position, but eventually lost it all.

<i>The Arrow</i> (miniseries) 1997 Canadian film

The Arrow is a four-hour television miniseries produced for CBC Television in 1997, starring Dan Aykroyd as Crawford Gordon, experienced wartime production leader after World War II and president of Avro Canada during its attempt to produce the Avro Arrow supersonic jet interceptor aircraft. The film also stars Michael Ironside and Sara Botsford. The mini-series is noted as having the highest viewership ever for a CBC program.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Avro Canada VZ-9 Avrocar</span> 1959 experimental VTOL aircraft model

The Avro Canada VZ-9 Avrocar was a VTOL aircraft developed by Avro Canada as part of a secret U.S. military project carried out in the early years of the Cold War. The Avrocar intended to exploit the Coandă effect to provide lift and thrust from a single "turborotor" blowing exhaust out of the rim of the disk-shaped aircraft. In the air, it would have resembled a flying saucer.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Canadair CL-84 Dynavert</span> Canadian experimental tiltwing VSTOL aircraft

The Canadair CL-84 "Dynavert", designated by the Canadian Forces as the CX-131, was a V/STOL turbine tiltwing monoplane designed and manufactured by Canadair between 1964 and 1972. Only four of these experimental aircraft were built with three entering flight testing. Two of the CL-84s crashed due to mechanical failures, with no fatalities occurring in either of the accidents. Despite the CL-84 being successful in the experimental and operational trials carried out between 1972 and 1974, none of the prospective customers placed any orders for the type.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Canadair Sabre</span> Canadian licensed built F-86 Sabre

The Canadair Sabre is a jet fighter aircraft built by Canadair under licence from North American Aviation. A variant of the North American F-86 Sabre, it was produced until 1958 and used primarily by the Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF) until replaced with the Canadair CF-104 in 1962. Several other air forces also operated the aircraft.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Orenda Engines</span>

Orenda Engines was a Canadian aircraft engine manufacturer and parts supplier. As part of the earlier Avro Canada conglomerate, which became Hawker Siddeley Canada, they produced a number of military jet engines from the 1950s through the 1970s, and were Canada's primary engine supplier and repair company.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Carver Meadows Frost</span>

John Carver Meadows Frost was a British aircraft designer. His primary contributions centred on pioneering supersonic British experimental aircraft and as the chief designer who shepherded Canada's first jet fighter project, the Avro Canada CF-100, to completion. He was also the major force behind the Avro Canada VTOL aircraft projects, particularly as the unheralded creator of the Avro Canada flying saucer projects.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">James C. Floyd</span> Canadian aerospace engineer

James Charles Floyd is a British-Canadian retired aeronautical engineer. He became the Avro Aircraft Ltd. (Canada) chief design engineer and his involvement, ultimately as vice-president (engineering), in the design and development of the Avro Canada C-102 Jetliner, Avro Canada CF-100 Canuck and Avro Canada CF-105 Arrow aircraft, occurred during a period which is viewed by many as the "Golden Age" of the Canadian aviation industry.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Orenda Iroquois</span> 1950s Canadian turbojet aircraft engine

The Orenda PS.13 Iroquois was an advanced turbojet engine designed for military use. It was developed by the Canadian aircraft engine manufacturer Orenda Engines, a part of the Avro Canada group. Intended for the CF-105 Arrow interceptor, development was cancelled, along with the Arrow, in 1959.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">No. 428 Squadron RCAF</span> Military unit

No. 428 Squadron RCAF, also known as 428 Bomber Squadron, and 428 Ghost Squadron, was first a night bomber squadron of the Royal Canadian Air Force engaged in strategic bombing during World War II, based in Yorkshire. At the end of the war the squadron moved to Nova Scotia before being disbanded in September 1945. In 1954 the squadron was reformed as 428 All-Weather (Fighter) Squadron, before being again disbanded in 1961.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Avro Canada Orenda</span> 1940s Canadian turbojet aircraft engine

The Avro Canada TR5 Orenda was the first production jet engine from Avro Canada's Gas Turbine Division. Similar to other early jet engines in design, like the Rolls-Royce Avon or General Electric J47.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aerospace Heritage Foundation of Canada</span>

The Aerospace Heritage Foundation of Canada is a federally chartered and non-profit organization based in Etobicoke, Toronto, Ontario, that is dedicated to preserving and promoting the achievements of the Canadian aerospace industry.

References

Notes
  1. After being brought into the XC-100 project at a late stage, Frost considerably "cleaned up" the original design but realized the "rudimentary" wing/engine planform limited the design to subsonic performance levels. Consequently, he began a further redesign based on his independent study of more advanced swept-wing designs. [5]
  2. Scale models of the proposed CF-103 indicated a more streamlined wing/engine section that incorporated a thick wing root blending the engines into the top of the fuselage. Pinion (outboard wing) fuel tanks and a mildly swept tail were also featured. [7]
  3. Although an Orenda TR7 was first contemplated, the more powerful Orenda 17 encountered recurrent problems in test flying with surging and asymmetrical thrust that were never resolved. [9]
  4. Although part of the "chain" from the CF-100S/CF-100D leading to the supersonic C-104 Advanced Fighter study, the CF-103 was obsolescent and proved to be a "dead end." [10] The C-104 as the C-104/2 was destined to morph into the later Avro CF-105 Arrow . [3]
  5. Canada had made a military commitment to enter the Korean War with the Department of National Defence mobilizing to provide a credible RCAF presence, including fielding a front line fighter squadron; ultimately, only an Air Transport Command unit was deployed. With Avro struggling with the CF-100's wing spar problems that had led to the RCAF rejecting the first series of pre-production aircraft, the Canadian government was justifiably concerned that the company was diverting its energies. Along with the cancellation of the CF-103, Avro's other high-profile project, the Avro Canada C102 Jetliner was similarly affected, with production of the airliner being halted. [11]
  6. Żurakowski had permission to explore the maximum speed of the aircraft, although along with his direct superiors in the Flight Test office, all were unaware that the Special Projects Group of the Design Office had been concurrently promoting the CF-103 project to the RCAF. [13]
Citations
  1. 1 2 Milberry 1984, p. 317.
  2. 1 2 Milberry 1981, p. 48.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Page et al. 2004, p. 11.
  4. 1 2 Campagna 2003, p. 55.
  5. 1 2 Zuk 2001, p. 28.
  6. 1 2 Milberry 1981, p. 49.
  7. 1 2 3 4 Valiquette 2009, p. 74.
  8. Page 1981, p. 70.
  9. Page 1981, p. 68.
  10. 1 2 Page et al. 2004, p. 12.
  11. Milberry 1984, p. 258.
  12. Milberry 1981, pp. 48–49.
  13. Stewart 1991, p. 228.
  14. Zuk 2004, p. 184.
Bibliography