Azar v. Garza

Last updated
Azar v. Garza
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 4, 2018
Full case nameAlex Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. v. Rochelle Garza, as guardian ad litem to unaccompanied minor J. D.
Docket no. 17-654
Citations584 U.S. ___ ( more )
Case history
PriorTemporary restraining order granted, Garza v. Hargan, No. 1:17-cv–02122 (D.D.C. Oct. 18, 2017); vacated in part, D.C. Cir., Oct. 19, 2017; vacated and remanded, 874 F. 3d 735 (D.C. Cir. 2017) (en banc)
Holding
Judgment below should be vacated and remanded with a direction to dismiss when a federal civil case has become moot while on its way to the Supreme Court.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Anthony Kennedy  · Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg  · Stephen Breyer
Samuel Alito  · Sonia Sotomayor
Elena Kagan  · Neil Gorsuch
Case opinion
MajorityPer curiam
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. XIV

Garza v. Hargan (Azar v. Garza after Alex Azar's confirmation as United States Secretary of Health and Human Services) is a case before the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit regarding a juvenile undocumented immigrant in the custody of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement who sought to have an abortion. [1] [2] [3]

Contents

Background

In early September 2017, a seventeen-year-old Jane Doe, was apprehended after illegally crossing the Mexico–United States border into Texas. [4] : 1812  As an unaccompanied minor, Jane was placed into care of the Office of Refugee Resettlement. [4] : 1813  Jane, who was then eight weeks pregnant, was sent to an ORR funded shelter where she decided to have an abortion. [4] : 1813  A Texas judge granted Jane a judicial bypass to the state's parental consent law and allowed her to seek an abortion on September 25, 2017. [4] : 1813 

The ORR refused to allow Jane to leave the shelter to have her abortion. [4] : 1813  In March 2017, new ORR Director Scott Lloyd had forbid federally funded shelters from taking "any action that facilitates" an abortion without his express approval. [4] : 1813  [5] Jane's guardian ad litem, Rochelle Garza, then sued the Acting United States Secretary of Health and Human Services, Eric Hargan, in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, alleging that the government was violating Jane's constitutional right to an abortion in the United States. [4] : 1813 

On October 18, 2017, U.S. District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan granted Jane's request for a temporary restraining order, ordering the government to allow Jane to leave the shelter to attend the pre-abortion counseling required by Texas law and to undergo the abortion. [6] [4] : 1813  On October 20, a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit granted the government's emergency motion to stay Judge Chutkan's order. [4] : 1813  In an unsigned order by Circuit Judges Brett Kavanaugh and Karen L. Henderson, the court allowed ORR to keep Jane from leaving its shelter to undergo an abortion until October 31, provided that the government "expeditiously" placed Jane in an outside sponsor's custody. [4] : 1814  Circuit Judge Patricia Millett wrote a dissent in which she argued the majority was imposing an undue burden on abortion in violation of Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt (2016). [4] : 1814 

On October 24, the full en banc D.C. Circuit reversed the panel majority, reimposing the district court order requiring the government to grant Jane access to an abortion. [7] [4] : 1815  Judge Millet added a concurrence reiterating the arguments in her earlier dissent. [4] : 1815  Judge Henderson dissented, arguing that an undocumented immigrant is not a "person" under the United States Constitution and so does not have rights under the Due Process Clause. [4] : 1815  Judge Kavanaugh, joined by Judges Henderson and Thomas B. Griffith, dissented, defending the panel decision. [4] : 1815  That day, District Judge Chutkan amended her order to allow Jane's abortion to proceed "promptly and without delay". [4] : 1815  Jane had her pregnancy aborted on October 25. [4] : 1815 

Supreme Court

On November 3, 2017, the Solicitor General of the United States, Noel Francisco, petitioned the Supreme Court of the United States for a writ of certiorari to vacate the D.C. Circuit's ruling and moved for sanctions against Jane's lawyers at the American Civil Liberties Union. [8] Francisco accused David D. Cole of professional misconduct for not informing the Justice Department that Jane's abortion procedure had been rescheduled to earlier than anticipated. [8] According to Francisco, this wrongfully prevented the government from seeking an emergency order from the Supreme Court blocking the procedure. [8]

On June 4, 2018, the Supreme Court granted review and vacated the judgment on the ground that the claim for injunctive relief granted by the lower court had become moot when the girl followed through with the abortion. Vacating the lower court decision prevents it from having any value as precedent. [9] [10] The Court did not grant the government's request for sanctions against Jane's attorneys. [11] The opinion was unsigned.

On December 18, 2017, Judge Chutkan granted relief to two additional pregnant girls in ORR care who had sued for access to an abortion. [12] On March 30, 2018, Judge Chutkan certified the pregnant girls' lawsuit as a class action and ordered the government to provide access to abortions to all girls in ORR's custody. [13]

Further reading

Related Research Articles

Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow, 542 U.S. 1 (2004), was a case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court. The lawsuit, originally filed as Newdow v. United States Congress, Elk Grove Unified School District, et al. in 2000, led to a 2002 ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit that the words "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance are an endorsement of religion and therefore violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. The words had been added by a 1954 act of Congress that changed the phrase "one nation indivisible" into "one nation under God, indivisible". After an initial decision striking the congressionally added "under God", the superseding opinion on denial of rehearing en banc was more limited, holding that compelled recitation of the language by school teachers to students was invalid.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sandra Segal Ikuta</span> American judge

Sandra Segal Ikuta is a United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Ilana Kara Diamond Rovner is a United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Rovner was the first woman appointed to the Seventh Circuit. She was previously a United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jerry Edwin Smith</span> American judge

Jerry Edwin Smith is an American attorney and jurist serving as a United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">William J. Bauer</span> United States federal judge

William Joseph Bauer is a Senior United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Chicago and previously a United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.

James L. Dennis is a United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, with chambers in New Orleans, Louisiana.

Joel Martin Flaum is a Senior United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit and a former United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.

Karen LeCraft Henderson is a United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and a former United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Brett Kavanaugh</span> U.S. Supreme Court justice since 2018

Brett Michael Kavanaugh is an American lawyer and jurist serving as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. He was nominated by President Donald Trump on July 9, 2018, and has served since October 6, 2018. He was previously a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and worked as a staff lawyer for various offices of the federal government of the United States.

Reno v. Flores, 507 U.S. 292 (1993), was a Supreme Court of the United States case that addressed the detention and release of unaccompanied minors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jane L. Kelly</span> American judge

Jane Louise Kelly is a United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tanya S. Chutkan</span> American judge

Tanya Sue Chutkan is a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA), sometimes called Deferred Action for Parental Accountability, was a planned United States immigration policy to grant deferred action status to certain undocumented immigrants who have lived in the United States since 2010 and have children who are either American citizens or lawful permanent residents. It was prevented from going into effect. Deferred action would not be legal status but would come with a three-year renewable work permit and exemption from deportation. DAPA was a presidential executive action, not a law passed by Congress.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John K. Bush</span> American judge

John Kenneth Bush is an American attorney and United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Bush graduated from Harvard Law School and practiced in Washington, D.C. and Louisville, Kentucky, where he served as president of the local branch of the Federalist Society. In 2017, he was nominated to a seat on the Sixth Circuit by President Donald Trump. During his confirmation hearings, it was revealed that Bush had authored pseudonymous blog posts in which he disparaged gay rights, compared abortion to slavery, and cited alt-right websites promoting birtherism and other false right-wing conspiracy theories. He was confirmed in the Senate by the Republican majority on a party-line vote of 51–47 in July 2017.

Trump v. Hawaii, No. 17-965, 585 U.S. ___ (2018), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case involving Presidential Proclamation 9645 signed by President Donald Trump, which restricted travel into the United States by people from several nations, or by refugees without valid travel documents. Hawaii and several other states and groups challenged the Proclamation and two predecessor executive orders also issued by Trump on statutory and constitutional grounds. Citing a variety of statements by Trump and administration officials, they argued that the proclamation and its predecessor orders were motivated by anti-Muslim animus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">James C. Ho</span> American judge

James Chiun-Yue Ho is a Taiwanese-born American lawyer and jurist serving as a U.S. circuit judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California, 591 U.S. ___ (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a 2017 U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) order to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) immigration program was "arbitrary and capricious" under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and reversed the order.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Julius N. Richardson</span> American judge

Julius Ness "Jay" Richardson is an American judge and lawyer who serves as a United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. He was formerly an Assistant United States Attorney for the District of South Carolina.

Wolf v. Vidal, 591 U.S. ___ (2020), was a case that was filed to challenge the Trump Administration's rescission of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). Plaintiffs in the case are DACA recipients who argue that the rescission decision is unlawful under the Administrative Procedure Act and the Fifth Amendment. On February 13, 2018, Judge Garaufis in the Eastern District of New York addressed the question of whether the government offered a legally adequate reason for ending the DACA program. The court found that Defendants did not provide a legally adequate reason for ending the DACA program and that the decision to end DACA was arbitrary and capricious. Defendants have appealed the decision to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.

June Medical Services, LLC v. Russo, 591 U.S. 1101 (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that a Louisiana state law placing hospital-admission requirements on abortion clinics doctors was unconstitutional. The law mirrored a Texas state law that the Court found unconstitutional in 2016 in Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt (WWH).

References

  1. ↑ "A Federal Appeals Court Just Ruled That An Undocumented Teen Can Get An Abortion". BuzzFeed. Archived from the original on 2017-10-25. Retrieved 2017-10-24.
  2. ↑ "Abortion decision for undocumented 17-year-old in US custody delayed". ABC News. 2017-10-21. Archived from the original on 2017-10-24. Retrieved 2017-10-24.
  3. ↑ Sacchetti, Maria; Marimow, Ann E. (2017-10-20). "Appeals court delays abortion for undocumented teen; gives government time to find her a sponsor". Washington Post. ISSN   0190-8286. Archived from the original on 2017-10-25. Retrieved 2017-10-24.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Note, Recent Case: En Banc D.C. Circuit Upholds Order Requiring HHS to Allow an Undocumented Minor to Have an Abortion , 131 Harv. L. Rev. 1812 (2018).
  5. ↑ Peters, Jeremy W. (5 April 2018). "Under Trump, an Office Meant to Help Refugees Enters the Abortion Wars". The New York Times . p. A1. Archived from the original on 18 June 2018. Retrieved 18 June 2018.
  6. ↑ Garza v. Hargan, No.1:17-cv-02122 ( D.D.C. Oct. 18, 2017).
  7. ↑ Garza v. Hargan, 874F.3d735 ( D.C. Cir. 2017).
  8. 1 2 3 Liptak, Adam (3 November 2017). "Justice Department Accuses A.C.L.U. of Misconduct in Abortion Case". The New York Times . p. A10. Archived from the original on 18 June 2018. Retrieved 18 June 2018.
  9. ↑ Azar v. Garcia, 584 U. S. ____ (2018).
  10. ↑ "Azar v. Garza". Oyez. Archived from the original on 2018-08-01. Retrieved 2018-08-03.
  11. ↑ Liptak, Adam (4 June 2018). "Supreme Court Rejects Bid to Discipline A.C.L.U." The New York Times. p. A14. Archived from the original on 18 June 2018. Retrieved 18 June 2018.
  12. ↑ Astor, Maggie (18 December 2017). "2 Undocumented Teenagers Must Be Allowed Abortions, Judge Rules". The New York Times. p. A14. Archived from the original on 18 June 2018. Retrieved 18 June 2018.
  13. ↑ Stevens, Matt (31 March 2018). "Judge Temporarily Stops U.S. From Blocking Undocumented Teenagers' Abortions". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 18 June 2018. Retrieved 18 June 2018.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.