Border Defence Cooperation Agreement

Last updated
Border Defence Cooperation Agreement
Agreement between the Government of the Republic of India and the Government of the People's Republic of China on Border Defence Cooperation
R.K. Mathur and the Deputy Chief of General Staff, PLA of China, Lt. Gen. Sun Jianguo signing an Agreement on Border Defence Cooperation, in the presence of the Prime Minister.jpg
The Indian Defence Secretary, R. K. Mathur and the PLA Deputy Chief of General Staff, Lt. Gen. Sun Jianguo signing the Agreement in Beijing on 23 October 2013. Premier Li Keqiang and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh present.
TypeBorder management
Confidence Building Measure [1]
Context
Signed23 October 2013
Location Great Hall of the People, Tiananmen Square, Beijing [2]
Condition Ratification by China and India
Parties
Citations Agreement
Languages
Full text
Wikisource-logo.svg India-China Border Agreement 2013 at Wikisource

The Agreement between India and China on Border Defence Cooperation (BDCA) covers border stability and security, information asymmetry, smuggling, socio-economic reconstruction, environment and disease transmission along the line of actual control. [1] [3] [4] It is an incremental addition to the previous border agreements related to the Sino-Indian border dispute. [5] [6]

Contents

BDCA is one of the growing number of defence cooperation agreements being signed between countries worldwide. [7] [ failed verification ]

Background

China proposed the BDCA as early as the 5th India-China annual defence dialogue (ADD) in January 2013. [8] The following months saw negotiations and counter-proposals by India. [8] [9]

In April 2013, India reported a Chinese PLA incursion at the mouth of Depsang Bulge near the Line of Actual Control in eastern Ladakh. [10] [11] This three week face-off was one of the border incidents that took place during the drafting of the agreement. [1] [12] In July 2013, India also saw PLA movement into Chumar and transgressions in Barahoti and Dichu. [13]

In July 2013, the Indian Minister of Defence met his counterpart General Chang Wanquan, as well as Chinese Prime Minister Li Keqiang and State Councilor Yang Jiechi. In a joint statement, with regard to "peace and tranquility in their border areas" both sides appreciated "that border defence cooperation would make a significant contribution in that regard" and "they agreed on an early conclusion of negotiations for a proposed agreement on border defence cooperation between the two Governments". [14]

The agreement was finalized at a meeting of the Joint Working Group a few weeks before it was finally signed in Beijing in October 2013. [8]

Agreements

BDCA mentions the "India-China Strategic and Cooperative Partnership for Peace and Prosperity" and four previous border agreements:

Articles

BDCA has ten articles. The agreement outlines ways to implement border defence cooperation "on the basis of their respective laws and relevant bilateral agreements". This includes the exchange of information, joint smuggling efforts, assistance in locating trans-border movement, disease transmission or "any other way mutually agreed upon the two sides". The agreement goes on to elaborate on mechanisms for implementing this border defence cooperation including flag meeting, border personal meetings, hotlines and meetings between representatives at various fora. This agreement goes a step further by saying that cooperation can be enhanced through CBMs such as cultural exchanges, "non-contact" sports, military exercises, and "small scale tactical exercises along the line of actual control in the India-China border areas." Military clauses cover tailing patrols, seeking clarification in areas of differing perceptions of the Line of Actual Control and practice military restraint in all ways. The agreement clearly stated that the agreement would be honoured irrespective of the alignment of the LAC. The agreement concludes in an elastic nature, "It may be revised, amended or terminated with the consent of the two sides. Any revision or amendment, mutually agreed by the two sides, shall form an integral part of this Agreement'. [15] [16] [4]

Aftermath

The BDCA was met with skepticism from a number of Indian analysts. [17] [18] [19] Monika Chansoria, head of the China-study program Centre for Land Warfare Studies, called the agreement as a Beijing "engineered" with no clear progress or differentiation from previous agreements, adding that the main issue of resolving the border dispute was not part of the BDCA. [17] Jayadeva Ranade pointed out that there was no reference to status quo, ambiguity in the way certain arguments were framed including lines related to infrastructure development. [20] However, D Suba Chandran, director at Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies, stated "even the worst critique would not find faults with it [the agreement]". [16]

In a press conference on 24 October 2013, a day after BDCA was signed, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China spokesperson Hua Chunying stated that "Over the past decades, with the concerted efforts of the two countries, negotiations on the boundary question have sustained a sound momentum and the border areas are basically peaceful and tranquil." [21]

During the 2020-21 China-India border skirmishes the BDCA and other border agreements failed in their purpose. [22]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sino-Indian War</span> 1962 war between China and India

The Sino-Indian War also known as Indo-China War, Indo-China War of 1962 or Sino-Indian War of 1962, took place between China and India from October to November 1962. It was a military escalation of the Sino-Indian border dispute. Fighting occurred along India's border with China, in India's North-East Frontier Agency east of Bhutan, and in Aksai Chin west of Nepal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Foreign relations of Bhutan</span>

Bhutan has diplomatic relations with 54 of 193 member states of the United Nations and the European Union. Bhutan's limited number of such relations, including the absence of formal relations with any of the permanent members of the United Nations Security Council, is part of a deliberate isolationist policy of limiting foreign influence in the state. This stance has been safeguarded by close relations with India, of which Bhutan has previously been considered a protected state.

The Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence are the Chinese government's foreign relations principles first mentioned in the 1954 Sino-Indian Agreement. Also known as Panchsheel, these principles were subsequently adopted in a number of resolutions and statements, including the preamble to the Constitution of the People's Republic of China.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Line of Actual Control</span> Disputed boundary between China and India

The Line of Actual Control (LAC), in the context of the Sino-Indian border dispute, is a notional demarcation line that separates Indian-controlled territory from Chinese-controlled territory. The concept was introduced by Chinese premier Zhou Enlai in a 1959 letter to Jawaharlal Nehru as the "line up to which each side exercises actual control", but rejected by Nehru as being incoherent. Subsequently, the term came to refer to the line formed after the 1962 Sino-Indian War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">China–India relations</span> Bilateral relations

The People’s Republic of China and the Republic of India established bilateral relations in 1950. India and China have historically maintained peaceful relations for thousands of years of recorded history, but the harmony of their relationship has varied in modern times, after the Chinese Communist Party's victory in the Chinese Civil War in 1949, and especially post the Annexation of Tibet by the People's Republic of China. The two nations have sought economic cooperation with each other, while frequent border disputes and economic nationalism in both countries are a major point of contention.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nathu La and Cho La clashes</span> Border clashes between China and India in 1967

The Nathu La and Cho La clashes, sometimes referred to as the Sino-Indian War of 1967, Indo-China War of 1967 or Second Sino-Indian War, consisted of a series of border clashes between India and China alongside the border of the Himalayan Kingdom of Sikkim, then an Indian protectorate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sino-Indian border dispute</span> Border dispute between China and India

The Sino-Indian border dispute is an ongoing territorial dispute over the sovereignty of two relatively large, and several smaller, separated pieces of territory between China and India. The first of the territories, Aksai Chin, is administered by China as part of the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region and Tibet Autonomous Region and claimed by India as part of the union territory of Ladakh; it is mostly uninhabited high-altitude wasteland in the larger regions of Kashmir and Tibet and is crossed by the Xinjiang-Tibet Highway, but with some significant pasture lands at the margins. The other disputed territory is south of the McMahon Line, in the area formerly known as the North-East Frontier Agency and now called Arunachal Pradesh which is administered by India. The McMahon Line was part of the 1914 Simla Convention signed between British India and Tibet, without China's agreement. China disowns the agreement, stating that Tibet was never independent when it signed the Simla Convention.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bhutan–China relations</span> Bilateral relations

The Kingdom of Bhutan and the People's Republic of China do not maintain official diplomatic relations, and relations are historically tense. The PRC shares a contiguous border of 470 kilometers with Bhutan, and its territorial disputes with Bhutan have been a source of potential conflict. Since the 1984, the two governments have conducted regular talks on border and security issues to reduce tensions.

The Sino-Pakistan Agreement is a 1963 document between the governments of Pakistan and China establishing the border between those countries in the disputed Kashmir region.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">S. Jaishankar</span> External Affairs Minister of India since 2019

Dr. Subrahmanyam Jaishankar is an Indian diplomat and politician serving as the Minister of External Affairs of the Government of India since 30 May 2019, became the second ever diplomat to be appointed as External Affairs minister, after Natwar Singh. He is a member of the Bharatiya Janata Party and a Member of Parliament in the Rajya Sabha since 5 July 2019. He previously served as the Foreign Secretary from January 2015 to January 2018.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2017 China–India border standoff</span> Military dispute over road construction

The 2017 China–India border standoff or Doklam standoff was a military border standoff between the Indian Armed Forces and the People's Liberation Army of China over Chinese construction of a road in Doklam, near a trijunction border area known as Donglang, or Donglang Caochang, meaning Donglang pasture or grazing field, in Chinese. On 16 June 2017 Chinese troops with construction vehicles and road-building equipment began extending an existing road southward in Doklam, a territory that is claimed by both China and India's ally Bhutan.

The History of Indian foreign policy refers to the foreign relations of modern India post-independence, that is the Dominion of India (from 1947 to 1950) and the Republic of India (from 1950 onwards).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Brahma Chellaney</span> Indian geostrategist and writer

Brahma Chellaney is a geostrategist, public intellectual, columnist and author on geostrategic affairs. He is a professor of strategic studies at the Centre for Policy Research in New Delhi. He was a member of India's National Security Advisory Board and an author of its draft nuclear doctrine. He is a regular columnist for Project Syndicate, and writes for numerous other international publications. He is the author of nine books on geostrategic affairs, of which Asian Juggernaut was a best-seller and Water: Asia's New Battleground received the $20,000 Bernard Schwartz Award.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">India–Tibet relations</span> Relations between Tibet and India

Tibet–India relations are said to have begun during the spread of Buddhism to Tibet from India during the 7th and 8th centuries AD. In 1959, the Dalai Lama fled to India after the failed 1959 Tibetan uprising. Since then, Tibetans-in-exile have been given asylum in India, with the Indian government accommodating them into 45 residential settlements across 10 states in the country. From around 150,000 Tibetan refugees in 2011, the number fell to 85,000 in 2018, according to government data. Many Tibetans are now leaving India to go back to Tibet and other countries such as United States or Germany. The Government of India, soon after India's independence in 1947, treated Tibet as a de facto independent country. However, more recently India's policy on Tibet has been mindful of Chinese sensibilities, and has recognized Tibet as a part of China.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Differing perceptions of the Line of Actual Control</span>

Differing perceptions or areas of differing perceptions was a theory to explain why border conflicts have arisen between China and India, since the Border Peace and Tranquility Agreement, 1993 has been signed. It maintains that the two sides have different perception of where the Line of Actual Control (LAC) between the territories of the two countries lies. Further, the Chinese have their own understanding of where the Indians perceive their LAC to be, and vice versa. For many decades India and China carried forward the differing perceptions theory.

The 1954 Sino-Indian Agreement, also called the Panchsheel Agreement, officially the Agreement on Trade and Intercourse Between Tibet Region of China and India, was signed by China and India in Peking on 29 April 1954. The preamble of the agreement stated the panchsheel, or the five principles of peaceful coexistence, that China proposed and India favoured. The agreement reflected the adjustment of the previously existing trade relations between Tibet and India to the changed context of India's decolonisation and China's assertion of suzerainty over Tibet. Bertil Lintner writes that in the agreement, "Tibet was referred to, for the first time in history, as 'the Tibet Region of China'".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Border Peace and Tranquility Agreement, 1993</span> Agreement between China and Indian regarding border management

The Border Peace and Tranquility Agreement is an agreement signed by China and India in September 1993, agreeing to maintain the status quo on their mutual border pending an eventual boundary settlement. The Agreement on Military Confidence Building Measures, 1996, pursuant to the 1993 agreement, incrementally details the military confidence building measures to be implemented that would ensure no-war. The Protocol for the Implementation of Military Confidence Building Measures, 2005 further discussed modalities to implement the confidence building measures.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Agreement on the Political Parameters and Guiding Principles for the Settlement of the India-China Boundary Question, 2005</span>

The Agreement on the Political Parameters and Guiding Principles for the Settlement of the India-China Boundary Question is an agreement between the India and China signed on 11 April 2005. The agreement is a direct outcome of the Special Representative (SR) mechanism that had been set up through a 2003 agreement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Working Mechanism for Consultation and Coordination on India–China Border Affairs</span>

The Working Mechanism for Consultation and Coordination on India–China Border Affairs (WMCC) was set up through an India-China agreement in January 2012 for improved institutionalized information exchange on border related issues. The mechanism was first suggested by Wen Jiabao in 2010. It was finalised at the 15th round of special representative talks in January 2012.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">India–China Joint Working Group on the boundary question</span>

The Joint Working Group (JWG) was the first official bilateral administrative mechanism formed post the 1962 boundary war by India and China to discuss the boundary question with the aim of finding a solution. It was officially announced in a joint press communique in Beijing on 23 December 1988. A total of fifteen meetings of the JWG were held between 1989 and 2005. The last meeting was held on 30–31 March 2005.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Das, Bijoy (January–March 2014). "Border Defence Cooperation Agreement. The Icebreaker in Making?" (PDF). Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses. 1 (1): 35–48.
  2. Blanchard, Ben (2013-10-23). Macfie, Nick (ed.). "China, India sign deal aimed at soothing border tension". Reuters. Retrieved 2021-07-08.
  3. "Inter-State Border Defence Cooperation Agreement between India and China". PA-X: Peace Agreements Database. Archived from the original on 2021-07-09. Retrieved 2021-07-02.
  4. 1 2 "Ten things you should know about India,China border defence agreement". The Indian Express. Press Information Bureau. 2014-03-14. Archived from the original on 2014-06-12. Retrieved 2021-07-02.
  5. Shukla, Ajai (2013-10-24). "India, China sign border defence pact". Business Standard India. Retrieved 2021-07-02.
  6. Chellaney, Brahma (2013-10-21). "Why India's new border pact with China won't work". mint. Archived from the original on 2013-10-22. Retrieved 2021-07-02.
  7. Kinne, Brandon J. (15 August 2018). "Defense Cooperation Agreements and the Emergence of a Global Security Network". International Organization. 72 (4): 799–837. doi: 10.1017/S0020818318000218 . ISSN   0020-8183. S2CID   158722872.
  8. 1 2 3 Resilient Sino-Indian Relationship, Indian Foreign Affairs Journal (2013), pg. 389.
  9. "India gives counter proposal for Border Defence Coop Agreement". The Pioneer. 12 May 2013. Archived from the original on 2021-07-09. Retrieved 2021-07-08.
  10. Sawant, Gaurav C. (26 April 2013), "India is No Pushover: Salman Khurshid", India Today, archived from the original on 30 April 2013, retrieved 7 July 2021
  11. Hashmi, Sana (29 October 2013). "Border Defence Cooperation Agreement: A New Beginning?" (PDF). Centre for Air Power Studies . Archived (PDF) from the original on 5 March 2017. Retrieved 7 July 2021.
  12. "China-India reach border defence pact". Al Jazeera. 23 October 2013. Archived from the original on 2020-10-31. Retrieved 2021-07-08.
  13. Chellaney, Brahma (2013-07-30). "China's game plan to keep India on the back foot". mint. Retrieved 2021-07-08.
  14. "Full Text of Joint Statement by Chinese and Indian Defence Ministers". Embassy of the People's Republic of China in the Republic of India. 6 July 2013. Archived from the original on 2013-10-07. Retrieved 2021-07-08.
  15. Border Defence Cooperation Agreement between India and China. Governments of India and China via Wikisource.
  16. 1 2 Chandran, D Suba (27 October 2013). "India & China: An Assessment of October 2013 Agreements: Border Defence Agreement". Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies. Archived from the original on 2021-07-09. Retrieved 2021-07-08.
  17. 1 2 Chansoria, Monika (13 January 2014). "India-China Border Agreement: Much Ado about Nothing". Foreign Policy. Archived from the original on 2014-12-07. Retrieved 2021-07-08.
  18. Bhat, Lt Col Anil (2014-08-02). "An Ambiguous Border Defence Cooperation Agreement With China?". Salute. Archived from the original on 2016-12-30. Retrieved 2021-07-08.
  19. Sawhney, Pravin. "The BDC agreement is a win-win for China than India". Force India. Archived from the original on 2018-05-29. Retrieved 2021-07-08.
  20. Ranade, Jayadeva (27 October 2013). "India & China: An Assessment of October 2013 Agreements- No Tangibles". Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies. Archived from the original on 2021-04-23. Retrieved 2021-07-08.
  21. "Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Hua Chunying's Regular Press Conference on October 24, 2013". Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China. Archived from the original on 2015-09-24. Retrieved 2021-07-08.
  22. Joshi, Manoj (24 June 2020). "There is an answer to Modi's enigma on Galwan". ORF. Archived from the original on 2020-06-26. Retrieved 2021-07-02.
Bibliography