In mathematical logic, the Borel hierarchy is a stratification of the Borel algebra generated by the open subsets of a Polish space; elements of this algebra are called Borel sets. Each Borel set is assigned a unique countable ordinal number called the rank of the Borel set. The Borel hierarchy is of particular interest in descriptive set theory.
One common use of the Borel hierarchy is to prove facts about the Borel sets using transfinite induction on rank. Properties of sets of small finite ranks are important in measure theory and analysis.
The Borel algebra in an arbitrary topological space is the smallest collection of subsets of the space that contains the open sets and is closed under countable unions and complementation. It can be shown that the Borel algebra is closed under countable intersections as well.
A short proof that the Borel algebra is well-defined proceeds by showing that the entire powerset of the space is closed under complements and countable unions, and thus the Borel algebra is the intersection of all families of subsets of the space that have these closure properties. This proof does not give a simple procedure for determining whether a set is Borel. A motivation for the Borel hierarchy is to provide a more explicit characterization of the Borel sets.
The Borel hierarchy or boldface Borel hierarchy on a space X consists of classes , , and for every countable ordinal greater than zero. Each of these classes consists of subsets of X. The classes are defined inductively from the following rules:
The motivation for the hierarchy is to follow the way in which a Borel set could be constructed from open sets using complementation and countable unions. A Borel set is said to have finite rank if it is in for some finite ordinal ; otherwise it has infinite rank.
If then the hierarchy can be shown to have the following properties:
The classes of small rank are known by alternate names in classical descriptive set theory.
The lightface Borel hierarchy (also called the effective Borel hierarchy [1] pp.163--164) is an effective version of the boldface Borel hierarchy. It is important in effective descriptive set theory and recursion theory. The lightface Borel hierarchy extends the arithmetical hierarchy of subsets of an effective Polish space. It is closely related to the hyperarithmetical hierarchy.
The lightface Borel hierarchy can be defined on any effective Polish space. It consists of classes , and for each nonzero countable ordinal less than the Church–Kleene ordinal . Each class consists of subsets of the space. The classes, and codes for elements of the classes, are inductively defined as follows: [2]
A code for a lightface Borel set gives complete information about how to recover the set from sets of smaller rank. This contrasts with the boldface hierarchy, where no such effectivity is required. Each lightface Borel set has infinitely many distinct codes. Other coding systems are possible; the crucial idea is that a code must effectively distinguish between effectively open sets, complements of sets represented by previous codes, and computable enumerations of sequences of codes.
It can be shown that for each there are sets in , and thus the hierarchy does not collapse. No new sets would be added at stage , however.
A famous theorem due to Spector and Kleene states that a set is in the lightface Borel hierarchy if and only if it is at level of the analytical hierarchy. These sets are also called hyperarithmetic. Additionally, for all natural numbers , the classes and of the effective Borel hierarchy are the same as the classes and of the arithmetical hierarchy of the same name. [1] p.168
The code for a lightface Borel set A can be used to inductively define a tree whose nodes are labeled by codes. The root of the tree is labeled by the code for A. If a node is labeled by a code of the form (1,c) then it has a child node whose code is c. If a node is labeled by a code of the form (2,e) then it has one child for each code enumerated by the program with index e. If a node is labeled with a code of the form (0,e) then it has no children. This tree describes how A is built from sets of smaller rank. The ordinals used in the construction of A ensure that this tree has no infinite path, because any infinite path through the tree would have to include infinitely many codes starting with 2, and thus would give an infinite decreasing sequence of ordinals. Conversely, if an arbitrary subtree of has its nodes labeled by codes in a consistent way, and the tree has no infinite paths, then the code at the root of the tree is a code for a lightface Borel set. The rank of this set is bounded by the order type of the tree in the Kleene–Brouwer order. Because the tree is arithmetically definable, this rank must be less than . This is the origin of the Church–Kleene ordinal in the definition of the lightface hierarchy.
Lightface | Boldface | ||
---|---|---|---|
Σ0 0 = Π0 0 = Δ0 0 (sometimes the same as Δ0 1) | Σ0 0 = Π0 0 = Δ0 0 (if defined) | ||
Δ0 1 = recursive | Δ0 1 = clopen | ||
Σ0 1 = recursively enumerable | Π0 1 = co-recursively enumerable | Σ0 1 = G = open | Π0 1 = F = closed |
Δ0 2 | Δ0 2 | ||
Σ0 2 | Π0 2 | Σ0 2 = Fσ | Π0 2 = Gδ |
Δ0 3 | Δ0 3 | ||
Σ0 3 | Π0 3 | Σ0 3 = Gδσ | Π0 3 = Fσδ |
⋮ | ⋮ | ||
Σ0 <ω = Π0 <ω = Δ0 <ω = Σ1 0 = Π1 0 = Δ1 0 = arithmetical | Σ0 <ω = Π0 <ω = Δ0 <ω = Σ1 0 = Π1 0 = Δ1 0 = boldface arithmetical | ||
⋮ | ⋮ | ||
Δ0 α (α recursive) | Δ0 α (α countable) | ||
Σ0 α | Π0 α | Σ0 α | Π0 α |
⋮ | ⋮ | ||
Σ0 ωCK 1 = Π0 ωCK 1 = Δ0 ωCK 1 = Δ1 1 = hyperarithmetical | Σ0 ω1 = Π0 ω1 = Δ0 ω1 = Δ1 1 = B = Borel | ||
Σ1 1 = lightface analytic | Π1 1 = lightface coanalytic | Σ1 1 = A = analytic | Π1 1 = CA = coanalytic |
Δ1 2 | Δ1 2 | ||
Σ1 2 | Π1 2 | Σ1 2 = PCA | Π1 2 = CPCA |
Δ1 3 | Δ1 3 | ||
Σ1 3 | Π1 3 | Σ1 3 = PCPCA | Π1 3 = CPCPCA |
⋮ | ⋮ | ||
Σ1 <ω = Π1 <ω = Δ1 <ω = Σ2 0 = Π2 0 = Δ2 0 = analytical | Σ1 <ω = Π1 <ω = Δ1 <ω = Σ2 0 = Π2 0 = Δ2 0 = P = projective | ||
⋮ | ⋮ |
In mathematical analysis and in probability theory, a σ-algebra on a set X is a nonempty collection Σ of subsets of X closed under complement, countable unions, and countable intersections. The ordered pair is called a measurable space.
In mathematics, a Borel set is any set in a topological space that can be formed from open sets through the operations of countable union, countable intersection, and relative complement. Borel sets are named after Émile Borel.
In mathematical logic, the arithmetical hierarchy, arithmetic hierarchy or Kleene–Mostowski hierarchy classifies certain sets based on the complexity of formulas that define them. Any set that receives a classification is called arithmetical. The arithmetical hierarchy was invented independently by Kleene (1943) and Mostowski (1946).
In mathematics, particularly in set theory, the aleph numbers are a sequence of numbers used to represent the cardinality of infinite sets that can be well-ordered. They were introduced by the mathematician Georg Cantor and are named after the symbol he used to denote them, the Hebrew letter aleph.
In mathematical logic, descriptive set theory (DST) is the study of certain classes of "well-behaved" subsets of the real line and other Polish spaces. As well as being one of the primary areas of research in set theory, it has applications to other areas of mathematics such as functional analysis, ergodic theory, the study of operator algebras and group actions, and mathematical logic.
In mathematical logic and descriptive set theory, the analytical hierarchy is an extension of the arithmetical hierarchy. The analytical hierarchy of formulas includes formulas in the language of second-order arithmetic, which can have quantifiers over both the set of natural numbers, , and over functions from to . The analytical hierarchy of sets classifies sets by the formulas that can be used to define them; it is the lightface version of the projective hierarchy.
In calculus, the Leibniz integral rule for differentiation under the integral sign states that for an integral of the form
Determinacy is a subfield of set theory, a branch of mathematics, that examines the conditions under which one or the other player of a game has a winning strategy, and the consequences of the existence of such strategies. Alternatively and similarly, "determinacy" is the property of a game whereby such a strategy exists. Determinacy was introduced by Gale and Stewart in 1950, under the name "determinateness".
In computability theory, a function is called limit computable if it is the limit of a uniformly computable sequence of functions. The terms computable in the limit, limit recursive and recursively approximable are also used. One can think of limit computable functions as those admitting an eventually correct computable guessing procedure at their true value. A set is limit computable just when its characteristic function is limit computable.
In the mathematical discipline of set theory, there are many ways of describing specific countable ordinals. The smallest ones can be usefully and non-circularly expressed in terms of their Cantor normal forms. Beyond that, many ordinals of relevance to proof theory still have computable ordinal notations. However, it is not possible to decide effectively whether a given putative ordinal notation is a notation or not ; various more-concrete ways of defining ordinals that definitely have notations are available.
In the mathematical field of descriptive set theory, a pointclass is a collection of sets of points, where a point is ordinarily understood to be an element of some perfect Polish space. In practice, a pointclass is usually characterized by some sort of definability property; for example, the collection of all open sets in some fixed collection of Polish spaces is a pointclass.
In recursion theory, α recursion theory is a generalisation of recursion theory to subsets of admissible ordinals . An admissible set is closed under functions, where denotes a rank of Godel's constructible hierarchy. is an admissible ordinal if is a model of Kripke–Platek set theory. In what follows is considered to be fixed.
In recursion theory, hyperarithmetic theory is a generalization of Turing computability. It has close connections with definability in second-order arithmetic and with weak systems of set theory such as Kripke–Platek set theory. It is an important tool in effective descriptive set theory.
In proof theory, ordinal analysis assigns ordinals to mathematical theories as a measure of their strength. If theories have the same proof-theoretic ordinal they are often equiconsistent, and if one theory has a larger proof-theoretic ordinal than another it can often prove the consistency of the second theory.
In mathematics, particularly set theory, non-recursive ordinals are large countable ordinals greater than all the recursive ordinals, and therefore can not be expressed using recursive ordinal notations.
In set theory and computability theory, Kleene's is a canonical subset of the natural numbers when regarded as ordinal notations. It contains ordinal notations for every computable ordinal, that is, ordinals below Church–Kleene ordinal, . Since is the first ordinal not representable in a computable system of ordinal notations the elements of can be regarded as the canonical ordinal notations.
In mathematical logic and set theory, an ordinal collapsing function is a technique for defining certain recursive large countable ordinals, whose principle is to give names to certain ordinals much larger than the one being defined, perhaps even large cardinals, and then "collapse" them down to a system of notations for the sought-after ordinal. For this reason, ordinal collapsing functions are described as an impredicative manner of naming ordinals.
In set theory, an ordinal number, or ordinal, is a generalization of ordinal numerals aimed to extend enumeration to infinite sets.
In mathematics, Rathjen's psi function is an ordinal collapsing function developed by Michael Rathjen. It collapses weakly Mahlo cardinals to generate large countable ordinals. A weakly Mahlo cardinal is a cardinal such that the set of regular cardinals below is closed under . Rathjen uses this to diagonalise over the weakly inaccessible hierarchy.