Legislative career
2009 appointment
Gov. Bill Ritter tapped Rep. Don Marostica to serve as the state's director of economic development in 2009,opening up a vacancy in Marostica's house seat. DelGrosso was one of five who put themselves forward for the vacancy committee appointment,standing against local activist Tom Buchanan and former legislative candidate Kevan McNaught,who had lost the Republican primary to Marostica in 2006. [2] [13] After giving a speech at the vacancy committee meeting in August emphasizing his small business experience and his frustration with state government,DelGrosso tied with Buchanan on the first ballot,receiving 19 votes from the 54-member committee. On the second ballot,after McNaught and other candidates withdrew,DelGrosso received a majority of 29 votes. [10]
2010 legislative session
For his first legislative session,DelGrosso was named to seats on the House Finance Committee and the House State,Veterans,&Military Affairs Committee. [14] In addition to vocally opposing the elimination of business tax credits, [7] [15] DelGrosso sponsored legislation to reduce the number of situations in which late vehicle registration fees are charged, [16] to allow local governments to purchase workers compensation insurance for volunteers participating in property tax work-off programs, [17] [18] to allow alcoholic beverages to be served in luxury boxes of sports stadiums. [19] [20]
2010 election
After his vacancy appointment,DelGrosso announced that he intended to seek election to a full term in 2010. [11] [21] He is expected to face Democrat and Loveland school board member Bill McCreary in the November 2010 general election. [22]
2011 legislative session
 | This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (November 2012) |
2012 legislative session
| | This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (November 2012) |
2012 election
In the 2012 General Election, Representative DelGrosso faced Democratic challenger Mark R. Shaffer. Delgrosso was reelected by a margin of 55% to 41% with the remainder of the vote going to third-party candidates. [23] [24]
