CU project controversy

Last updated

The CU powerline (on the right) was the subject of controversy and protests HVDC Crossover North-Dakota.jpg
The CU powerline (on the right) was the subject of controversy and protests

The CU project controversy [1] involved years of protest against a proposed high-voltage direct current powerline that was erected on the property of hundreds of farmers in west central Minnesota in the late 1970s. The electrical cooperatives Cooperative Power Association (CPA) and United Power Association (UPA) proposed construction of the powerline, which was part of a larger project that also involved the construction of an electrical generating station and coal mine.

Contents

Opposition to the powerline began in 1974 and involved political parties, churches, civic organizations, and businesses in several different Minnesota counties. [2] [3] Farmers were concerned that construction of the powerline on their land might make farming difficult, reduce the value of the land, or adversely impact their health. [4] [5] [6] The powerline was reviewed in 33 meetings in North Dakota and 48 meetings in Minnesota and in two years of hearings; at the time, no other powerline in Minnesota state history had gone through such a drawn-out review process. [7] [8] Multiple candidates for state office included the powerline issue as part of their platforms. [2]

Farmers employed tractors, manure spreaders, and ammonia sprayers and used direct action and civil disobedience in an attempt to prevent construction of the line. Powerline protests drew national attention when over 200 state troopers, nearly half the Minnesota Highway Patrol, were deployed to ensure that construction of the line would continue. [9] During a two-year period, a group of opponents to the line who called themselves "bolt weevils" tore down 14 powerline towers and shot out nearly 10,000 electrical insulators. [10]

Background

The growth of electrical co-ops

The CU Powerline Project was initiated by the Cooperative Power Association (CPA) of Edina, Minnesota and the United Power Association (UPA) of Elk River, Minnesota. The CPA and UPA were Minnesota electrical generation and transmission associations of a combined total of 34 retail electrical co-ops. [11] [12] Retail electrical co-ops developed following the establishment of the Rural Electrification Administration (REA) in 1935 and the Rural Electrification Act in 1936. [13] The REA began to distribute loans to groups involved in increasing access to electricity in the rural United States. Retail electrical co-ops formed in order to be eligible for the REA's distribution loans. [13] Co-ops often combined in federations to purchase power from private utilities or federal agencies. Occasionally these co-op associations built their own generating stations. [14]

Motivation behind the CU project

Several factors led the UPA and CPA to undertake the CU project. The UPA and CPA traditionally purchased most of their power from the Bureau of Reclamation's Garrison Dam on the Missouri River in North Dakota. [15] The UPA and CPA wanted to curtail their purchase of power to avoid the long term contract commitments. They desired to increase their "control over their energy supplies and costs". [15] The UPA and CPA predicted that they would not be able to meet the demand of retail co-op members for their electricity. As a result of the oil crisis of the 1970s, oil prices more than doubled from 1973 to 1978. The UPA and CPA believed that consumers would switch to electricity as a source of power to avoid high oil prices. [16] Demand for the electricity provided by the UPA and CPA was already growing and the UPA and CPA predicted that this growth would continue at the same rate. [17] A 1972 study of the CU project's feasibility predicted that the UPA and CPA would face a "projected power generation deficit of 665 megawatts by 1978". [18] As well, the UPA and CPA needed the CU project to meet their agreements with the Mid-continent Area Power Pool (MAPP), an association of twenty-eight utilities serving seven states in the Midwest. [12] [19] In order to join the MAPP, the UPA and CPA had to sign an agreement that obligated them to "power pool" or maintain a 15% surplus of power for sale to the other members of the MAPP. [12] [20]

CU project and the REA

In 1972, the UPA and CPA approached the REA about the possibility of building a new generating station. [3] The REA favored a lignite coal generator in North Dakota over a Minnesota plant using Montana coal shipped by train. [3] The REA had financed other lignite coal generators in North Dakota, three of which were among the ten most economical plants in the country in the early 1970s. [3] The REA agreed to finance the construction through low-interest loans. [21] At the time of construction, the CU project was the largest and most expensive single project in the history of the REA. [5] [21] When the project was announced, there was only one other comparable high voltage powerline in the United States: the Bonneville Power Administration's Pacific Intertie that runs from Oregon to Los Angeles. [21] [22]

CU project

Components

The CU project consists of three parts: the Falkirk Mine, the Coal Creek Generating Station, and the CU Powerline. [23] A subsidiary of North American Coal Corporation runs the Falkirk Mine, a lignite coal strip mine in North Dakota that covers over twenty-five square miles and uses two of the biggest dragline excavators ever assembled. [23] The lignite uncovered by the draglines travels by conveyor belt to Coal Creek Station, the largest lignite-fired plant in North Dakota. [23] The Coal Creek Station produces AC current which is converted into DC current at a conversion station. [23] This DC current is transmitted from Coal Creek Station in North Dakota 440 miles (710 km) to a station near Buffalo, Minnesota, where it is converted back into AC current. The powerline crosses nine western and central Minnesota counties and includes a total of 659 towers placed at one-quarter mile intervals on the property of 476 landowners. [7]

Arguments against the CU project

The first opponents to the CU project were farmers who found out that the powerline would be built on their land. Farmers were upset with the way that the powerline route was initially conceived. In 1973 the UPA and CPA hired a consulting firm which used a numbering system to assess the value of the land between North Dakota and Minnesota. They assigned high numbers (more value) to airports, highways, and wildlife areas but zero to agricultural land. [24] The line would cross diagonally across farms, which farmers believed would disrupt irrigation and aerial spraying and seeding, limit future land use, and reduce the value of the land. [5] [6] Farmers believed that their way of life was being disrupted to "supply mainly urban population centers" with power. [25] The UPA's and CPA's customers did not like the fact that their electricity bills would be increased in order to pay off the loans that the REA and other creditors had granted the UPA and CPA to finance the project. [26] Opponents believed that the CPA and UPA "demand forecasts might be self-serving" and that alternatives to building the line such as conservation were not seriously considered. [27] [28] Farmers worried that the effects of direct electric current on livestock and humans had not been adequately explored. [4]

Notable protest activities

Timeline of CU project controversy

Following the EQC decision to issue a construction permit to the CPA and UPA and several years of legal battles and public hearings, farmers were "no longer in a mood to work within the system". [49] On June 8, 1976, a farmer smashed a surveying tripod with his tractor and rammed a pickup truck belonging to the survey crew. [50] This was the first act of illegal protest against the powerline.

Following the events of June 8, farmers notified each other by CB radio regarding surveying activities and turned out in groups to block the surveyors' work. [51] As the protests grew in momentum, local radio stations carried news of when and where protesters would gather. [52] The Lowry town hall became the headquarters where protesters, some having traveled from surrounding counties, would gather every morning to make plans. [53] [54] The survey crews began to be accompanied by law enforcement.

Farmers used a variety of tactics to thwart surveying on their property. They raised signs on poles to block the view of the surveyors. [55] When a protester was hauled away for blocking the surveyor's line of sight, another protester would take the original protester's place. [56] Farmers ran chainsaws to make it difficult for surveyors to hear and communicate. On one instance, farmers were granted permission by their town board to repair a road leading to a survey site. When survey crews arrived, farmers had put up roadblocks and were in the process of digging a hole in the road. [52] Farmers used their tractors to pile boulders around the tower base holes preventing concrete from being poured. One farmer parked his truck with the key broken off in the ignition to block cement mixers. Another farmer "drove upwind of a utility crew then switched on his manure spreader". Survey stakes would vanish overnight. [57]

Mobilization of state troopers

On January 4, 1978, one hundred farmers chased powerline crews from three different sites and "scuffled" with state troopers. [58] Protesters dismantled parts of a tower in full view of the troopers. [59] The following Friday, Governor Perpich ordered what was, at the time, the largest mobilization of state troopers in Minnesota history. [59] National and international news reporters began arriving in Lowry to cover the protest. [8] [42] On January 9, 200 protesters marched across a survey site to hand each trooper a plastic carnation. Protesters also offered troopers coffee and cookies. [42] [60] The protest numbers continued to grow throughout January 1978. Thousands of farmers rallied in Saint Paul, Minnesota. In one community, school was let out so teachers and students could join the rally. [61]

"Battle of Stearns County"

On February 15, 1978, farmers sprayed troopers with anhydrous ammonia, a fertilizer that can cause serious chemical burns. [8] [62] Media reaction to this act was negative and protesters became divided over tactics. [63] Protesters began making greater use of nonviolent resistance. Protesters covered themselves in pig manure and asked the police to arrest them. [64]

"March for Justice"

On March 5, 1978 over eight-thousand people marched from Lowry to Glenwood in below freezing temperatures to protest the CU project. Marchers followed a tractor draped with an American flag that carried a coffin labeled "Justice" and a figure labeled "Corporate Giant". [43]

"Bolt Weevils"

Beginning in August 1978, a group that called themselves the "Bolt Weevils" began to sabotage power line towers and shoot out electrical insulators. [45] [65] The General Assembly to Stop the Powerline (GASP) put out a regular newsletter called Hold That Line. Referring to the actions of the Bolt Weevils, one issue stated, "It is a mistake to label these as acts of vandalism. Vandalism means 'ignorant destruction of property,' and it would be a big misunderstanding to think that these acts are creatures of ignorance." [66] The electrical co-ops hired outside security officers that used helicopters and vehicles to patrol the line. [67] The UPA and CPA launched a public relations campaign to communicate to customers that vandalism would lead to electric bill increases. [68] On August 1, 1979, the CU powerline went into commercial operation. On September 9, 1980, the REA took ownership of the line, in part so that attacks on the line would become federal offenses. [48] In the end, Bolt Weevils toppled 20 power line towers and shot out nearly 10,000 electrical insulators. [69]

Consequences

In the end, protesters were unsuccessful in blocking construction of the powerline. The fight had the unintended consequence of higher payments to farmers whose land was taken for the powerline. [4] From 1976 to 1978, 120 people were arrested in connection with the protest. Four people were convicted of criminal counts and one was convicted of felony charges. [47]

Soon after the powerline entered commercial operation, the UPA and CPA saw a dropoff in demand for electricity. The UPA and CPA ended up selling this surplus electricity to other utilities. [16] Eventually, consumer demand increased. Since 1980, consumer demand for electricity in Minnesota has doubled. In the late 2000s, Xcel Energy, Inc. and 10 other utility companies announced plans to build a new high-voltage transmission line. [70]

A report detailing health concerns about the CU powerline was cited by a judge as a reason to block powerline construction in Texas. [16]

In the mid-2000s, a new group calling itself the "Bolt Weevils" emerged in Minnesota. The group vandalized Novartis/Northrup-King's seed research facility and trampled 50 rows of research corn adjacent to Pioneer Hi-Bred's seed research facility. [71]

Organizations formed to fight the power line

Inspired art

National television news reports

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paul Wellstone</span> American politician (1944–2002)

Paul David Wellstone was an American academic, author, and politician who represented Minnesota in the United States Senate from 1991 until he was killed in a plane crash near Eveleth, Minnesota, in 2002. A member of the Democratic Party (DFL), Wellstone was a leader of the populist and progressive wings of the party.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Drax Power Station</span> Biomass power station in North Yorkshire

Drax power station is a large biomass power station in Drax, North Yorkshire, England. It has a 2.6 GW capacity for biomass and had a 1.29 GW capacity for coal that was retired in 2021. Its name comes from the nearby village of Drax. It is situated on the River Ouse between Selby and Goole. Its generating capacity of 3,906 megawatts (MW), which includes the shut down coal units, is the highest of any power station in the United Kingdom, providing about 6% of the United Kingdom's electricity supply.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Transmission tower</span> Structure used to support an overhead power line

A transmission tower is a tall structure, usually a lattice tower made of steel that is used to support an overhead power line. In electrical grids, transmission towers carry high-voltage transmission lines that transport bulk electric power from generating stations to electrical substations, from which electricity is delivered to end consumers; moreover, utility poles are used to support lower-voltage sub-transmission and distribution lines that transport electricity from substations to electricity customers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Overhead line crossing</span> Crossing of an immovable obstacle by an overhead power line

An overhead line crossing is the crossing of an obstacle—such as a traffic route, a river, a valley or a strait—by an overhead power line. The style of crossing depends on the local conditions and regulations at the time the power line is constructed. Overhead line crossings can sometimes require extensive construction and can also have operational issues. In such cases, those in charge of construction should consider whether a crossing of the obstacle would be better accomplished by an underground or submarine cable.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Overhead power line</span> Above-ground structure for bulk transfer and distribution of electricity

An overhead power line is a structure used in electric power transmission and distribution to transmit electrical energy along large distances. It consists of one or more conductors suspended by towers or poles. Since the surrounding air provides good cooling, insulation along long passages and allows optical inspection, overhead power lines are generally the lowest-cost method of power transmission for large quantities of electric energy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Xcel Energy</span> American utility company

Xcel Energy Inc. is a U.S. regulated electric utility and natural gas delivery company based in Minneapolis, Minnesota, serving more than 3.7 million electric customers and 2.1 million natural gas customers across parts of eight states. It consists of four operating subsidiaries: Northern States Power-Minnesota, Northern States Power-Wisconsin, Public Service Company of Colorado, and Southwestern Public Service Co.

Square Butte is the designation of a high-voltage direct current transmission line in the United States between the Milton R. Young Power Plant near Center, North Dakota at 47°4′18″N101°11′45″W and the Arrowhead converter station near Adolph at 46°46′25″N92°17′39″W. It was built by Minnkota Power Cooperative and Minnesota Power and went in service in 1977. In 2009, an agreement was executed between the two companies whereby Minnkota gets the rights to all the power currently transmitted over the line while Minnesota Power takes full ownership of the line to transmit power from new sources in the Center area.

CU is the designation of a line for high-voltage direct current (HVDC) transmission between the Coal Creek Station power plant south of Underwood, North Dakota at 47°22′24″N101°9′23″W and the Dickinson converter station near Buffalo, Minnesota at 45°06′40″N93°48′36″W.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Drakelow Power Station</span> Series of power stations in England

Drakelow Power Station refers to a series of three now decommissioned and demolished coal-fired power stations located 2.4 mi (3.9 km) south of Burton upon Trent, Staffordshire in the West Midlands of England, on the River Trent. However, the station was actually located in the county of Derbyshire, in the East Midlands. The power station was a distinguishable landmark of Burton, which is most famous for its breweries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wind power in Iowa</span> Electricity from wind in one U.S. state

Making up over 62% of the state's generated electricity in 2022, wind power is the largest source of electricity generation in Iowa. In 2020, over 34 billion kWh of electrical energy was generated by wind power. As of 2022, Iowa has over 12,200 megawatts (MW) of installed capacity with over 6,000 wind turbines, ranking second and third in the nation below Texas respectively.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stella power stations</span> Pair of now-demolished coal-fired power station

The Stella power stations were a pair of now-demolished coal-fired power stations in the North East of England that were a landmark in the Tyne valley for over 40 years. The stations stood on either side of a bend of the River Tyne: Stella South power station, the larger, near Blaydon in Gateshead, and Stella North power station near Lemington in Newcastle. Their name originated from the nearby Stella Hall, a manor house close to Stella South that by the time of their construction had been demolished and replaced by a housing estate. They operated from shortly after the nationalisation of the British electrical supply industry until two years after the Electricity Act of 1989, when the industry passed into the private sector.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Connah's Quay Power Station</span> Gas-fired power station in Wales

Connah's Quay Power Station is the name of the current 1,420 MW gas-fired power station near Connah's Quay in Flintshire in North Wales. The power plant, which is situated on the south bank of the River Dee, is the modern successor to a coal-fired power station which closed in 1984 and demolished in 1992. The replacement gas-powered plant was completed in 1996 and began producing electricity a year later. It originally received its gas from the Point of Ayr terminal, which in turn comes from the offshore gas fields in Liverpool Bay.

National Wind, LLC, A Trishe Group of Company, is a Minneapolis company founded in 2003 that is a developer of large-scale, community-based wind energy projects. The company, along with National Wind Assessments, has 50 employees based in Minneapolis, MN and Grand Forks, North Dakota. National Wind claims to be the nation's leading developer of community-based wind farms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Padiham Power Station</span> Coal-fired power station in Lancashire, England

Padiham Power Station was a coal-fired power station in Padiham, east Lancashire, England, which began operation in 1926 and generated power from 1927 until it was closed in 1993.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Electricity sector in Germany</span> Overview of the electricity sector in Germany

Germany's electrical grid is part of the Synchronous grid of Continental Europe. In 2020, due to COVID-19 conditions and strong winds, Germany produced 484 TW⋅h of electricity of which over 50% was from renewable energy sources, 24% from coal, and 12% from natural gas, this amounting to 36% from fossil fuel. This is the first year renewables represented more than 50% of the total electricity production and a major change from 2018, when a full 38% was from coal, only 40% was from renewable energy sources, and 8% was from natural gas.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Reeve Electric Association Plant</span> United States historic place

The Reeve Electric Association Plant, now known as the REA Power Plant Museum, is a historic structure located near Hampton, Iowa, United States. In the 1930s only 10% of rural homes and farms in the United States had electricity. The first mention of rural electrification in Hampton came in March 1936.

Are you interested in getting a high line by your farm to enable you to have electricity on your farm? The federal government has made arrangements to finance this program for all interested farmers. To secure this aid we must have enough farmers in the county who are interested to make the construction of the line practical and to organize a cooperative to carry on the work. In order to get some idea of the amount of interest in this project we would like to have each farmer who would like to see this work started send us a card telling us the location of his farm and if possible the names of any neighbors who are interested. As soon the weather and roads permit we will have a series of meetings at which time we will have a representative of the federal government present to discuss the program with you.

The Bison Wind Energy Center is a 496.6 megawatt (MW) wind farm spanning southwest Oliver County and north-central Morton County in the U.S. state of North Dakota. It became the largest wind generating facility in the state upon completion of the fourth construction phase in early 2015. The facility allowed the investor-owned utility company, Minnesota Power, to obtain more than 25% of its electricity generation from renewable sources, exceeding Minnesota's 2025 renewable portfolio standard requirement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Huncoat Power Station</span> Former electricity generating station

Huncoat Power Station was located in Huncoat near Accrington, Lancashire. It was a 150 MW, coal-fired, electricity generating station in operation from 1952 to 1984. It has since been demolished. Huncoat power station replaced the earlier Accrington power station that had supplied electricity to the town since 1900.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alice Tripp</span>

Alice Raatama Tripp was an American anti-power line activist, English teacher, and farmer who ran for President of the United States in the 1980 Democratic party presidential primary, receiving two delegates at the convention. Tripp also ran for Governor of Minnesota in the 1978 election as a primary challenger to incumbent governor Rudy Perpich but was defeated.

References

  1. ↑ CU is a combination of the names Cooperative Power Association and United Power Association.
  2. 1 2 Fogerty, p. 81.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 Wellstone, p. 13.
  4. 1 2 3 Losure, Mary. "The towers are falling". Minnesota Public Radio. Retrieved November 23, 2009.
  5. 1 2 3 Wellstone, p. 28.
  6. 1 2 Wellstone, p. 7.
  7. 1 2 Fogerty, p. 80.
  8. 1 2 3 Losure, Mary. "'Rudy's Raiders' go home". Minnesota Public Radio. Retrieved November 23, 2009.
  9. ↑ Wellstone, p. 4.
  10. ↑ Wellstone, Paul David; Casper, Barry M. (December 26, 1981). "The Rural Energy War: Report from the Front Lines". The Nation: 699.
  11. ↑ Wellstone, p. 3, 10.
  12. 1 2 3 McKeon, Mark (October 30, 1976). "High Tension on the Prairie". The Nation : 436.
  13. 1 2 Clark Jr., Clifford (1989). Minnesota in a Century of Change: The State and its People since 1900. Minnesota Historical Society Press. p. 135.
  14. ↑ Wellstone, p. 10.
  15. 1 2 Fogerty, p. 86.
  16. 1 2 3 Doyle, Pat (November 13, 1988). "State Powerline Still Generating Concerns and Second-guesses". Minneapolis Star Tribune . p. 01A.
  17. ↑ Wellstone, p. 98.
  18. ↑ Fogerty, p. 79.
  19. ↑ Wellstone, p. 6.
  20. ↑ Wellstone, p. 7, 11.
  21. 1 2 3 Wellstone, p. 3.
  22. 1 2 Wellstone, p. 16.
  23. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Wellstone, p. 15.
  24. ↑ Wellstone, p. 17.
  25. ↑ Wellstone, p. 37.
  26. ↑ Wellstone, p. 18.
  27. ↑ Wellstone, p. 101.
  28. ↑ Wellstone, p. 112.
  29. 1 2 Wellstone, p. 19.
  30. ↑ Wellstone, p. 14.
  31. ↑ Wellstone, p. 26.
  32. ↑ Wellstone, p. 27.
  33. 1 2 3 Wellstone, p. 29.
  34. ↑ Wellstone, p. 44.
  35. ↑ Wellstone, p. 55.
  36. ↑ Wellstone, p. 95.
  37. ↑ Wellstone, p. 119.
  38. ↑ Wellstone, p. 140.
  39. ↑ Wellstone, p. 143.
  40. ↑ Wellstone, p. 166.
  41. ↑ Wellstone, p. 184.
  42. 1 2 3 Wellstone, p. 202.
  43. 1 2 Wellstone, p. 220.
  44. ↑ Wellstone, p. 221.
  45. 1 2 Wellstone, p. 273.
  46. ↑ Wellstone, p. 283.
  47. 1 2 Wellstone, p. 286.
  48. 1 2 Wellstone, p. 287.
  49. ↑ Wellstone, p. 135.
  50. ↑ Wellstone, p. 136.
  51. ↑ Wellstone, p. 137.
  52. 1 2 Wellstone, p. 145.
  53. ↑ Wellstone, p. 186.
  54. ↑ Kneeland, Douglas E. (January 25, 1978). "Minnesota Farmers Harass Surveyors for Power Lines". The New York Times . p. A12.
  55. ↑ Wellstone, p. 142.
  56. ↑ Wellstone, p. 146.
  57. ↑ Wellstone, p. 179.
  58. ↑ Wellstone, p. 201.
  59. 1 2 "Troopers Guard Minnesota Power Crews". Los Angeles Times . January 8, 1978. p. A6. Archived from the original on February 16, 2013.
  60. ↑ AP (January 10, 1978). "A Power Line Protest is Peaceful". The New York Times . p. 30.
  61. ↑ Wellstone, p. 211.
  62. ↑ Wellstone, p. 216.
  63. ↑ Wellstone, p. 218.
  64. ↑ Wellstone, p. 219.
  65. ↑ Wellstone, p. 277.
  66. ↑ Wellstone, p. 275.
  67. ↑ Wellstone, p. 278.
  68. ↑ Wellstone, p. 281.
  69. ↑ Wellstone, p. 699.
  70. ↑ Meyers, Mike (January 14, 2007). "A Less-Charged Debate". Minneapolis Star Tribune . p. 1D.
  71. ↑ International Food Safety Network (January 1, 2005). "BOLT WEEVILS COMMUNIQUE". Archived from the original on August 16, 2010. Retrieved November 24, 2009.
  72. ↑ Dave Foreman (1985). "Ecodefense: A Field Guide to Monkeywrenching". Ned Ludd Books. Archived from the original on November 24, 2010. Retrieved August 24, 2010.

Other sources

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.