Capital punishment in Tonga

Last updated

Capital punishment is legal in Tonga, but has not been imposed since 1982. [1] The country's lack of executions puts it into the category of a state abolitionist in practice, where it retains the death penalty in law but has had a formal or informal moratorium for at least ten years. Tonga's low rate of murder convictions forms part of the reason for the lack of executions, as well as its courts’ apparent unwillingness to impose the penalty unless it appears absolutely necessary to do so.

Contents

Legislation and case law

In Tonga, the governing legislation regarding the death penalty is the Criminal Offences Act. [2] This Act includes death in its list of punishments for criminal behaviour. [3] Capital punishment may be imposed for the crimes of murder [4] and treason. [5] It may not be imposed on a pregnant woman. [6] The ban on imposing the death penalty on a pregnant woman was added to the Criminal Offences Act via an amendment in 1939. [7] If a woman convicted of murder or treason alleges that she is pregnant, the question is put to a jury as to whether they are satisfied she is indeed pregnant. [8] The jury who decides this will, as a general rule, be the same jury who convicted her. [9] A person under 15 years old cannot receive the death penalty for murder. [10] However, due to the wording of the Act, it is unclear whether a person under this age may receive death as punishment for treason. [11]

In order for the death penalty to be imposed, the King must assent. He must do so with the consent of the Privy Council of Tonga. [12] The method of execution used is death by hanging. [13] After the execution of the offender, a medical officer must supply a certificate of death. [14] The requirement for a certificate of death was inserted by way of an amendment in 1958. [15] The jury who convicted the offender, alongside a magistrate for the district in which the death sentence was executed, must hold an “inquest” into the body of the offender. [16] The jury is to ascertain the identity of the deceased (that is, he or she is the offender they convicted). [17] The jury must also ensure that the “sentence of death was duly executed on the offender,” meaning that in addition to a medical certificate, the jury must ascertain that the offender is dead. [18] Those who have received the death sentence have their place of burial decided by the Tongan Privy Council – a place is chosen, and every offender executed will be buried in this place. [19] The Tongan Privy Council is also able to make “regulations” regarding executions, for the purposes of “guarding against any abuse in the execution,” “for giving greater solemnity thereto,” and to publicise outside of the prison that an execution is taking place. [20]

History

A mass execution was carried out in 1887 on the orders of King George Tupou I, when six men convicted of treason for attempting to assassinate premier Shirley Waldemar Baker were executed by firing squad on the small islet of Malinoa off of Nukuʻalofa. [21]

The most recent executions in Tonga took place in 1982, when Haloti Sole, Livingi Sole and Fili Esau were hanged for murder. [22] In the same year, the Tongan Parliament discussed abolishing the death penalty, but decided to retain it. [23]

In 2004, the Tongan Legislative Assembly voted on a bill which proposed to introduce the death penalty for possession of illicit drugs. This bill was defeated by the Assembly by a vote of 10–7, [24] indicating that the death penalty, if Tonga continues to retain it, will not spread to become an applicable sentence for other crimes. It is an indication that Tonga wishes to reserve the death penalty for the very serious crimes of murder and treason.

The issue of capital punishment was raised in 2005, when Tevita Siale Vola became the first person in Tonga to be convicted of murder in 24 years. [25] However, Webster CJ did not impose the death penalty, on the basis that Vola's actions did not meet the threshold of "one of the rarest of rare cases where the alternative option of life imprisonment is unquestionably foreclosed." [26] Webster CJ did not make any moral judgment on the death penalty, explaining that it was "a matter for the Government and Parliament" to decide whether the death penalty should be retained in Tonga. [27] The judgment in R v Vola serves as an indicator that Tonga does not impose the death penalty lightly.

International actions and other states' responses

General

The United Nations presented a moratorium on the death penalty in 2007. Tonga voted against this, and continued to do so in 2008, 2010, and 2012. However, more recently - in 2014 and 2016 - Tonga abstained from voting on this issue. [28]

In the aftermath of the 2006 Nuku‘alofa riots, where several men were suspected of murder, it appeared that these men may never face trial. The Australian government, which formed part of the investigative team for the riots, refused to hand over the autopsy reports of victims for fear of the death penalty being imposed on the suspects. [29]

Universal Periodic Review

2008 Cycle

In the course of its first Universal Periodic Review cycle in 2008, Tonga received a recommendation from Italy to abolish the death penalty. [30] Tonga responded with a reminder that it had not imposed such a penalty since 1982, and that it welcomed “further opportunities for discussion and debate on this issue.” [31] However, following this cycle, Tonga made no efforts towards abolition of the death penalty. Given that Tonga has ratified few international human rights treaties, it has few international obligations regarding the death penalty.

2012 Cycle

The 2012 cycle brought similar recommendations, this time from a number of States. These included recommendations from Australia, Spain, and the United Kingdom to ratify the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which is aimed at the abolition of the death penalty. Tonga is neither a signatory to, nor has it ratified, the ICCPR. As such, Australia and the United Kingdom's recommendations included a suggestion to ratify this Covenant as well. In its response, Tonga said that it had not considered ratifying the ICCPR. However, it referred to R v Vola as authority that the Tongan Courts are applying principles of the ICCPR despite its non-ratification status. [32]

During the 2012 UPR cycle, Italy and Slovakia each made separate recommendations regarding the imposition of the death penalty on people under 18. Italy suggested that Tonga “explicitly prohibit” this, with Slovakia recommending the “immediate” abolition of the death penalty for juvenile offenders. Italy specifically mentioned that this would be in accordance with the Convention on the Rights of the Child and a contemporary resolution of the General Assembly of the United Nations. [33] Tonga has ratified the CRC, which prohibits capital punishment for people aged under 18, regardless of the offence committed. [34]

Tonga's response during this cycle brought to light its determination to retain the death penalty. Despite being an abolitionist in practice, Tonga is essentially a retentionist state as it refuses to abolish capital punishment. [35]

Compared to other countries

Tonga joins 140 other countries which are abolitionist in law or practice. [36] It is the only country in Oceania to retain capital punishment.

Related Research Articles

Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty and formerly called judicial homicide, is the state-sanctioned practice of killing a person as a punishment for a crime, usually following an authorised, rule-governed process to conclude that the person is responsible for violating norms that warrant said punishment. The sentence ordering that an offender be punished in such a manner is known as a death sentence, and the act of carrying out the sentence is known as an execution. A prisoner who has been sentenced to death and awaits execution is condemned and is commonly referred to as being "on death row". Etymologically, the term capital refers to execution by beheading, but executions are carried out by many methods, including hanging, shooting, lethal injection, stoning, electrocution, and gassing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights</span> Treaty adopted by United Nations General Assembly in 1965

The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) is a multilateral treaty that commits nations to respect the civil and political rights of individuals, including the right to life, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, electoral rights and rights to due process and a fair trial. It was adopted by United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2200A (XXI) on 16 December 1966 and entered into force on 23 March 1976 after its thirty-fifth ratification or accession. As of June 2022, the Covenant has 173 parties and six more signatories without ratification, most notably the People's Republic of China and Cuba; North Korea is the only state that has tried to withdraw.

Life imprisonment is any sentence of imprisonment for a crime under which convicted criminals are to remain in prison for the rest of their natural lives. Crimes that warrant life imprisonment are usually violent and/or dangerous. Examples of crimes that result in life sentences are murder, torture, terrorism, child abuse resulting in death, rape, espionage, treason, Illegal drug trade, human trafficking, severe fraud and financial crimes, aggravated Property damage, arson, hate crime, kidnapping, burglary, and robbery, piracy, aircraft hijacking, and genocide.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Capital punishment in the United Kingdom</span> History of the death penalty in the UK

Capital punishment in the United Kingdom predates the formation of the UK, having been used within the British Isles from ancient times until the second half of the 20th century. The last executions in the United Kingdom were by hanging, and took place in 1964; capital punishment for murder was suspended in 1965 and finally abolished in 1969. Although unused, the death penalty remained a legally defined punishment for certain offences such as treason until it was completely abolished in 1998; the last execution for treason took place in 1946. In 2004 the 13th Protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights became binding on the United Kingdom; it prohibits the restoration of the death penalty as long as the UK is a party to the convention.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Capital punishment in India</span> Death penalty in India, its states and union territories

Capital punishment in India is a legal penalty for some crimes under the country's main substantive penal legislation, the Indian Penal Code, as well as other laws. Executions are carried out by hanging as the primary method of execution per Section 354(5) of the Criminal Code of Procedure, 1973 is "Hanging by the neck until dead", and is imposed only in the 'rarest of cases'.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Capital punishment in New Zealand</span> Overview of the topic

Capital punishment – the process of sentencing convicted offenders to death for the most serious crimes and carrying out that sentence, as ordered by a legal system – first appeared in New Zealand in a codified form when New Zealand became a British colony in 1840. It was first carried out with a public hanging in Victoria Street, Auckland in 1842, while the last execution occurred in 1957 at Mount Eden Prison, also in Auckland. In total, 85 people have been lawfully executed in New Zealand.

The "Bloody Code" was a series of laws in England, Wales and Ireland in the 18th and early 19th centuries which mandated the death penalty for a wide range of crimes. It was not referred to by this name in its own time; the name was given later owing to the sharply increased number of people given the death penalty, even for crimes considered minor by 21st century standards.

Capital murder refers to a category of murder in some parts of the US for which the perpetrator is eligible for the death penalty. In its original sense, capital murder was a statutory offence of aggravated murder in Great Britain, Northern Ireland, and the Republic of Ireland, which was later adopted as a legal provision to define certain forms of aggravated murder in the United States. Some jurisdictions that provide for death as a possible punishment for murder, such as California, do not have a specific statute creating or defining a crime known as capital murder; instead, death is one of the possible sentences for certain kinds of murder. In these cases, "capital murder" is not a phrase used in the legal system but may still be used by others such as the media.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Capital punishment in Belarus</span> Overview of the use of capital punishment in Belarus

Capital punishment is a legal penalty in Belarus. At least one execution was carried out in the country in 2022.

Capital punishment is a legal penalty in Sri Lanka.

Capital punishment is a legal penalty in Pakistan. Although there have been numerous amendments to the Constitution, there is yet to be a provision prohibiting the death penalty as a punitive remedy.

Although the legal system of Singapore is a common law system, the criminal law of Singapore is largely statutory in nature and historically derives largely from the Indian penal code. The general principles of criminal law, as well as the elements and penalties of general criminal offences such as assault, criminal intimidation, mischief, grievous hurt, theft, extortion, sex crimes and cheating, are set out in the Singaporean Penal Code. Other serious offences are created by statutes such as the Arms Offences Act, Kidnapping Act, Misuse of Drugs Act and Vandalism Act.

Capital punishment is a legal penalty in Malaysian law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Capital punishment in Armenia</span> Overview of the use of capital punishment in Armenia

Capital punishment in Armenia was a method of punishment that was implemented within Armenia's Criminal Code and Constitution until its eventual relinquishment in the 2003 modifications made to the Constitution. Capital punishment's origin in Armenia is unknown, yet it remained present in the Armenia Criminal Code of 1961, which was enforced and applied until 1999. Capital punishment was incorporated into Armenian legislation and effectuated for capital crimes, which were crimes that were classified to be punishable by death, including treason, espionage, first-degree murder, acts of terrorism and grave military crimes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Capital punishment in Ireland</span> Overview of the capital punishment in Ireland

Capital punishment in the Republic of Ireland was abolished in statute law in 1990, having been abolished in 1964 for most offences including ordinary murder. The last person to be executed by the British state on the island of Ireland was Robert McGladdery, who was hanged on 20 December 1961 in Crumlin Road Gaol in Belfast, Northern Ireland. The last person to be executed by the state in the Republic of Ireland was Michael Manning, hanged for murder on 20 April 1954. All subsequent death sentences in the Republic of Ireland, the last handed down in 1985, were commuted by the President, on the advice of the Government, to terms of imprisonment of up to 40 years. The Twenty-first Amendment of the constitution, passed by referendum in 2001, prohibits the reintroduction of the death penalty, even during a state of emergency or war. Capital punishment is also forbidden by several human rights treaties to which the state is a party.

Tonga is a constitutional monarchy with a population of approximately 130,000. Politics and the economy are dominated by the king, the nobility, and a few prominent commoners. Economic, social and cultural rights are generally well respected. There are, however, a number of issues concerning protection of civil and political rights, particularly freedom of expression, and rights to political participation. Violence against women is a serious issue.

Capital punishment is no longer a legal punishment in the Independent State of Papua New Guinea.

Capital punishment in Montenegro was first prescribed by law in 1798. It was abolished on 19 June 2002. The last execution, by shooting, took place on 29 January 1981, and the two last death sentences were pronounced on 11 October 2001. Montenegro is bound by the following international conventions prohibiting capital punishment : Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, as well as Protocols No. 6 and No. 13 to the European Convention on Human Rights. According to Art. 26 of the Montenegrin Constitution (2007): "In Montenegro, capital punishment punishment is forbidden”.

Capital punishment is a legal penalty in Jordan. The country had a moratorium on capital punishment between 2006 and 2014. In late 2014 the moratorium was lifted and 11 people were executed. Two more executions followed in 2015, 15 executions took place in 2017 and one in 2021. The method of execution is hanging, although shooting was previously the sole method for carrying out executions.

Capital punishment in Bangladesh is a legal form of punishment for anyone who is over 16, however in practice it would not apply to people under 18. Crimes that are currently punishable by death in Bangladesh are set out in the Penal Code 1860. These include waging war against the State, abetting mutiny, giving false evidence upon which an innocent person suffers death, murder, assisted suicide of a child, attempted murder of a child, and kidnapping. The Code of Criminal Procedure 1898 provides that a person awarded the death penalty "be hanged by the neck until he is dead." For murder cases, the Appellate Division requires trial courts to weigh aggravating and mitigating factors to determine whether the death penalty is warranted.

References

  1. Ballesteros, Raissa Katrina Marie G. (1999). "From Abolition to a Solution: a Real Alternative to Capital Punishment". Phil. L.J. 73: 528.
  2. Criminal Offences Act (Tonga)
  3. s 24(1)(e) Criminal Offences Act
  4. s 91(1) Criminal Offences Act
  5. s 44 Criminal Offences
  6. s 40 Criminal Offences Act
  7. Criminal Offences Act s 40
  8. Criminal Offences Act s 41(1)
  9. Criminal Offences Act s 41(2)
  10. s 91 Criminal Offences Act
  11. s 44 Criminal Offences Act
  12. s 33(2) Criminal Offences Act
  13. s 33(1) Criminal Offences Act
  14. s 36 Criminal Offences Act
  15. s 36 Criminal Offences Act
  16. s 37 Criminal Offences Act
  17. s 37(1) Criminal Offences Act
  18. s 37(1) Criminal Offences Act
  19. s 38 Criminal Offences Act
  20. s 39 Criminal Offences Act
  21. Rutherford, Noel (1971). Shirley Baker and the King of Tonga. Oxford University Press. pp. 144–146. ISBN   0195503503.
  22. "Capital Punishment in the British Commonwealth". capitalpunishmentuk. Retrieved 10 September 2017.
  23. "The last execution was carried out in 1982". Hands Off Cain. Retrieved 10 September 2017.
  24. "Tonga". Hands Off Cain. Retrieved 10 September 2017.
  25. "R v Vola [2005] TOLawRep 34". Pacific Islands Legal Information Institute. Retrieved 6 September 2017.
  26. "R v Vola [2005] TOLawRep 34". Pacific Islands Legal Information Institute. Retrieved 6 September 2017.
  27. "R v Vola [2005] TOLawRep34". Pacific Islands Legal Information Institute. Retrieved 7 September 2017.
  28. "The last execution was carried out in 1982". Hands Off Cain. Retrieved 10 September 2017.
  29. "NZ embroiled in diplomatic row". ONE News. 10 December 2007. Retrieved 10 September 2017.
  30. "UPR Report of the Working Group p 7". OHCHR. Archived from the original on 11 September 2017. Retrieved 7 September 2017.
  31. "UPR Report of the Working Group p 18". OHCHR. Archived from the original on 11 September 2017. Retrieved 7 September 2017.
  32. "UPR National Report p 20". OHCHR. Archived from the original on 11 September 2017. Retrieved 7 September 2017.
  33. "UPR Report of the Working Group p 17". OHCHR. Archived from the original on 11 September 2017. Retrieved 10 September 2017.
  34. Article 37 Convention on the Rights of the Child
  35. Baird, Natalie (2015). "The Role of International Non-Governmental Organisations in the Universal Periodic Review of the Pacific Island States: Can "Doing Good" be Done Better?". Melbourne Journal of International Law. 16 (2): 576.
  36. "The Death penalty in 2016: Facts and figures". Amnesty International. 11 April 2017. Retrieved 10 September 2017.