Carl Malamud

Last updated

Carl Malamud
Carl Malamud at Berkeley-2007-10-17-version.03.jpg
Carl Malamud speaking at the UC Berkeley iSchool about "(Re-)defining the public domain", October 17, 2007.
Born (1959-07-02) July 2, 1959 (age 64)
Known for Public.Resource.Org
Notable workExploring the Internet, A World's Fair
Awards 2009 EFF Pioneer Award

Carl Malamud (born July 2, 1959) is an American technologist, author, and public domain advocate, known for his foundation Public.Resource.Org. He founded the Internet Multicasting Service. During his time with this group, he was responsible for developing the first Internet radio station, [1] for putting the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's EDGAR database on-line, [2] and for creating the Internet 1996 World Exposition. [3]

Contents

Malamud is the author of eight books, including Exploring the Internet and A World's Fair. [4] [5] He was a visiting professor at the MIT Media Laboratory and is the former chairman of the Internet Software Consortium. He also is the co-founder of Invisible Worlds, was a fellow at the Center for American Progress, and was a board member of the non-profit Mozilla Foundation. [6] [7]

Public domain activism

Malamud set up the nonprofit Public.Resource.Org, headquartered in Sebastopol, California, to work for the publication of public domain information from local, state, and federal government agencies. [8] Among his achievements have been digitizing 588 government films for the Internet Archive and YouTube, [9] publishing a 5 million page crawl of the Government Printing Office, [10] and persuading the state of Oregon to not assert copyright over its legislative statutes. [11] He has also been active in challenging the state of California's copyright claims on state laws by publishing copies of the criminal, building, and plumbing codes online. [12]

He has also challenged the information management policy of Smithsonian Networks, convinced C-SPAN to liberalize its video archive access policy, and begun publishing court decisions. [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] In 2009 he proposed, through the "Yes We Scan" campaign, that he serve as the Public Printer of the U.S., the head of the Government Printing Office. [18] He is leading an effort, under the banner of Law.gov, to bring online all primary legal materials (including legal codes and case law) for open public access.

An early Internet pioneer, he is the author of many early books about networking such as Analyzing Novell Networks and DEC Networks and Architectures. [19] [20]

In September 2015, Malamud published a petition to the Government of the United Kingdom, calling for it to make the safety standards published by the European Union for toy safety freely available, rather than allowing them to continue being only available at high cost and subject to restrictive terms of use. [21]

PACER

In 2008, Malamud contended that the federal court archive Public Access to Electronic Court Records, which was charging 8 cents per page, should instead be providing the information for free, because government documents are not protected by copyright. [22] [23] The fees were "plowed back to the courts to finance technology, but the system [ran] a budget surplus of some $150 million, according to court reports," reported The New York Times . [22] PACER used technology that was "designed in the bygone days of screechy telephone modems ... put[ting] the nation's legal system behind a wall of cash and kludge." [22] Malamud appealed to fellow activists, urging them to visit one of 17 libraries conducting a free trial of the PACER system, download court documents, and send them to him for public distribution. [22]

After reading Malamud's call for action, [22] Aaron Swartz used a Perl computer script running on Amazon cloud servers to download the documents, using credentials belonging to a Sacramento library. [24] From September 4 to 20, 2008, Swartz's software accessed documents and uploaded them to a cloud computing service. [23] He released the documents to Malamud's organization. [23]

The Huffington Post characterized his actions this way: "Swartz downloaded public court documents from the PACER system in an effort to make them available outside of the expensive service. The move drew the attention of the FBI, which ultimately decided not to press charges as the documents, were, in fact, public." [25]

On September 29, 2008, [22] the GPO suspended the free trial, "pending an evaluation" of the program. [22] [23] Swartz's actions were subsequently investigated by the FBI. [22] [23] The case was closed after two months with no charges filed. [23] Swartz learned the details of the investigation as a result of filing a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request with the FBI and described their response as the "usual mess of confusions that shows the FBI's lack of sense of humor." [23] PACER still charges per page, but customers have the option of saving the documents for free public access with a browser extension called RECAP. [26]

At a 2013 memorial for Swartz, Malamud recalled their work with PACER. They brought millions of U.S. District Court records out from behind PACER's "pay wall", he said, and found them full of privacy violations, including medical records and the names of minor children and confidential informants.

We sent our results to the Chief Judges of 31 District Courts ... They redacted those documents and they yelled at the lawyers that filed them ... The Judicial Conference changed their privacy rules. ... [To] the bureaucrats who ran the Administrative Office of the United States Courts ... we were thieves that took $1.6 million of their property. So they called the FBI ... [The FBI] found nothing wrong ... [27]

Malamud penned a more detailed account of his collaboration with Swartz on the Pacer project in an essay. [28]

Writing in Ars Technica , Timothy Lee, who later made use of the documents obtained by Swartz as a co-creator of RECAP, offered some insight into discrepancies in reporting on just how much data Swartz had downloaded: "In a back-of-the-envelope calculation a few days before the offsite crawl was shut down, Swartz guessed he got around 25 percent of the documents in PACER. The New York Times similarly reported Swartz had downloaded "an estimated 20 percent of the entire database". Based on the facts that Swartz downloaded 2.7 million documents while PACER, at the time, contained 500 million, Lee concluded that Swartz downloaded less than one percent of the database. [24]

On October 18, 2018, a federal appeals court decision struck down the State of Georgia's attempt to claim that its officially published statutes were protected by copyright due to the addition of annotations. Although the state's Code Revision Commission did not claim that the statutes themselves were copyrighted, they believed that their annotated work could only be distributed by the state's chosen commercial publisher, Lexis-Nexis. [29]

Carl Malamud initiated the copyright challenge by purchasing the official printed works for more than $1200, digitally scanning the contents, and mailing the digital copies on USB flash memory drives to every Georgia legislator.

In 2013, the State of Georgia sued Malamud for providing the Official Code of Georgia Annotated on his website, borrowing his own word to describe it as "a successful form of 'terrorism'". [30] [31] [32]

The appeals court decision states:

"... we conclude that the People are the ultimate authors of the annotations. As a work of the People the annotations are inherently public domain material and therefore uncopyrightable. Because we conclude that no copyright can be held in the annotations, we have no occasion to address the parties’ other arguments regarding originality and fair use." [33]

In 2019 Malamud expressed a wish for the matter to advance to the Supreme Court for clarification, despite the appellate court ruling in his favor. [34]

Other pending lawsuits

Carl Malamud is currently[ when? ] involved in several lawsuits through his organization Public.Resource.Org. [35]

Malamud's campaign to become US Public Printer

In 2009 Malamud announced his candidacy to become Public Printer of the United States and asked for the public to endorse him for the position. [36] The role is filled by an appointment by the president and it is unusual that it would be the subject of a public campaign. [36] Malamud sought the position on a platform of promising to "make all primary legal materials produced by the U.S. readily available" and to include "principles of bulk data distribution in legislation." [36]

The Electronic Frontier Foundation said that his agenda was "ambitious and impressive" and that if President Barack Obama granted him the position that it would be an excellent step toward fulfilling his promise to introduce "an unprecedented level of openness in Government." [36]

Recognition

In 2009 Malamud received the EFF Pioneer Award from the Electronic Frontier Foundation for being a public domain advocate. [37]

Works

Malamud authored eight books as of 2009, including Exploring the Internet and A World's Fair. [37]

10 Rules for Radicals

10 Rules for Radicals is Malamud's keynote at the 19th World Wide Web Consortium conference in April 2010. It's a slim and often humorous account of interaction with various bureaucracies and how to make public sector information more accessible. [38] [39]

It sums up: [40]

  • Rule 1: Call everything an experiment.
  • Rule 2: When the starting gun goes off, run really fast. As a small player, the elephant can step on you, but you can outrun the elephant.
  • Rule 3: Eyeballs rule. If a million people use your service, and on the Internet you can do that, you’ve got a lot more credibility than if you’re just issuing position papers and flaming the man.
  • Rule 4: When the time comes, be nice.
  • Rule 5: Keep asking until they say yes. Gordon Bell, the inventor of the VAX, once said that you should keep your vision, but modify your plan.
  • Rule 6: When you get the microphone, get to the point. Be clear about what you want.
  • Rule 7: Get standing. Have some skin in the game, some reason you’re at the table.
  • Rule 8: Get them to threaten you.
  • Rule 9: Look for overreaching, things that are just blatantly, obviously wrong or silly.
  • And finally, rule 10, which is don’t be afraid to fail. It took Thomas Edison 10,000 times before he got the lightbulb right, and when he was asked about those failures, he said “I have not failed, I’ve just found 10,000 ways that won’t work.” Fail. Fail often. And don’t forget, you can question authority.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lawrence Lessig</span> American legal scholar and activist (born 1961)

Lester Lawrence Lessig III is an American legal scholar and political activist. He is the Roy L. Furman Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and the former director of the Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics at Harvard University. He is the founder of Creative Commons and Equal Citizens. Lessig was a candidate for the Democratic Party's nomination for president of the United States in the 2016 US presidential election but withdrew before the primaries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet Archive</span> American nonprofit digital archive

The Internet Archive is an American digital library founded on May 10, 1996, and chaired by free information advocate Brewster Kahle. It provides free access to collections of digitized materials including websites, software applications, music, audiovisual and print materials. The Archive also advocates for a free and open Internet. As of January 1, 2024, the Internet Archive holds more than 41 million print materials, 8.4 million videos, 0.89 million software programs, 14.7 million audio files, 4.4 million images, 240,000 concerts, and over 735 billion web pages in its Wayback Machine. Its mission is to provide "universal access to all knowledge".

<i>Official Code of Georgia Annotated</i> Compendium of all laws in the U.S. state of Georgia

The Official Code of Georgia Annotated or OCGA is the compendium of all laws in the state of Georgia. Like other state codes in the United States, its legal interpretation is subject to the U.S. Constitution, the U.S. Code, the Code of Federal Regulations, and the state's constitution. It is to the state what the U.S. Code is to the federal government.

Software copyright is the application of copyright in law to machine-readable software. While many of the legal principles and policy debates concerning software copyright have close parallels in other domains of copyright law, there are a number of distinctive issues that arise with software. This article primarily focuses on topics particular to software.

A software license is a legal instrument governing the use or redistribution of software. Under United States copyright law, all software is copyright protected, in both source code and object code forms, unless that software was developed by the United States Government, in which case it cannot be copyrighted. Authors of copyrighted software can donate their software to the public domain, in which case it is also not covered by copyright and, as a result, cannot be licensed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aaron Swartz</span> Computer programmer and internet/political activist (1986–2013)

Aaron Hillel Swartz was an American computer programmer, entrepreneur, writer, political organizer, and Internet hacktivist. As a programmer, Swartz helped develop the web feed format RSS; the technical architecture for Creative Commons, an organization dedicated to creating copyright licenses; the website framework web.py; and Markdown, a lightweight markup language format. Swartz was involved in the development of the social news aggregation website Reddit until he departed from the company in 2007. He is often credited as a martyr and a prodigy, and his work focused on civic awareness and activism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Open Library</span> Online project for book data of the Internet Archive

Open Library is an online project intended to create "one web page for every book ever published". Created by Aaron Swartz, Brewster Kahle, Alexis Rossi, Anand Chitipothu, and Rebecca Malamud, Open Library is a project of the Internet Archive, a nonprofit organization. It has been funded in part by grants from the California State Library and the Kahle/Austin Foundation. Open Library provides online digital copies in multiple formats, created from images of many public domain, out-of-print, and in-print books.

PACER is an electronic public access service for United States federal court documents. It allows authorized users to obtain case and docket information from the United States district courts, United States courts of appeals, and United States bankruptcy courts. The system is managed by the Administrative Office of the United States Courts in accordance with the policies of the Judicial Conference, headed by the Chief Justice of the United States. As of 2013, it holds more than 500 million documents.

The California Code of Regulations is the codification of the general and permanent rules and regulations announced in the California Regulatory Notice Register by California state agencies under authority from primary legislation in the California Codes. Such rules and regulations are reviewed, approved, and made available to the public by the Office of Administrative Law (OAL), and are also filed with the Secretary of State.

File sharing is the practice of distributing or providing access to digital media, such as computer programs, multimedia, program files, documents or electronic books/magazines. It involves various legal aspects as it is often used to exchange data that is copyrighted or licensed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Public.Resource.Org</span>

Public.Resource.Org (PRO) is a 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation dedicated to publishing and sharing public domain materials in the United States and internationally. It was founded by Carl Malamud and is based in Sebastopol, California.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) is an international non-profit advocacy and legal organization based in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Digital Millennium Copyright Act</span> United States copyright law

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) is a 1998 United States copyright law that implements two 1996 treaties of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). It criminalizes production and dissemination of technology, devices, or services intended to circumvent measures that control access to copyrighted works. It also criminalizes the act of circumventing an access control, whether or not there is actual infringement of copyright itself. In addition, the DMCA heightens the penalties for copyright infringement on the Internet. Passed on October 12, 1998, by a unanimous vote in the United States Senate and signed into law by President Bill Clinton on October 28, 1998, the DMCA amended Title 17 of the United States Code to extend the reach of copyright, while limiting the liability of the providers of online services for copyright infringement by their users.

<i>United States v. Swartz</i> American court case

In United States of America v. Aaron Swartz, Aaron Swartz, an American computer programmer, writer, political organizer and Internet activist, was prosecuted for multiple violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of 1986 (CFAA), after downloading academic journal articles through the MIT computer network from a source (JSTOR) for which he had an account as a Harvard research fellow. Facing trial and the possibility of imprisonment, Swartz committed suicide, and the case was consequently dismissed.

<i>Colorado Revised Statutes</i> Legal code of Colorado, United States

The Colorado Revised Statutes (C.R.S.) are a legal code of Colorado, the codified general and permanent statutes of the Colorado General Assembly.

In the United States, some state governments and legal publishers claim copyright of public laws or certain publications of public laws. It has long been established that edicts of government are not to be subject to copyright protection in the U.S., but copyright protection for the selection and arrangement of published law may remain possible, at least in some jurisdictions. The primary incentive for state governments is the ability to charge for copies of the law or legal annotations. This is a list of the hindrances to accessibility, copyright or otherwise, on the legal codes of U.S. states.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Free Law Project</span> Free legal research tools and database

Free Law Project is a United States federal 501(c)(3) Oakland-based nonprofit that provides free access to primary legal materials, develops legal research tools, and supports academic research on legal corpora. Free Law Project has several initiatives that collect and share legal information, including the largest collection of American oral argument audio, daily collection of new legal opinions from 200 United States courts and administrative bodies, the RECAP Project, which collects documents from PACER, and user-generated Supreme Court citation visualizations. Their data helped The Wall Street Journal expose 138 cases of conflict of interest cases regarding violations by federal judges.

<i>The Indigo Book</i> Style guide for legal citation

The Indigo Book: An Open and Compatible Implementation of A Uniform System of Citation is a free content version of the Bluebook system of legal citation. Founded by New York University professor Christopher Jon Sprigman, authored collectively by Sprigman and a group of NYU law students, and published by Public.Resource.Org, it is an adaptation based on the 10th edition of the Bluebook as published by the Harvard Law Review Association in 1958, which had entered the public domain in the United States because its copyright had expired due to non-renewal.

Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc., No. 18-1150, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), is a United States Supreme Court case regarding "whether the government edicts doctrine extends to—and thus renders uncopyrightable—works that lack the force of law, such as the annotations in the Official Code of Georgia Annotated" (OCGA). On April 27, 2020, the Court ruled 5–4 that the OCGA cannot be copyrighted because the OCGA's annotations were "authored by an arm of the legislature in the course of its legislative duties"; thus the Court found that the annotations fall under the government edicts doctrine and are ineligible for copyright.

<i>American Society for Testing and Materials et al. v. Public.Resource.Org</i> United States legal case

American Society for Testing and Materials et al. v. Public.Resource.Org is a United States court case concerning copyright of published building codes and fire codes and public access to the same. In 2013, Public.Resource.Org was sued by the American Society for Testing and Materials, the National Fire Protection Association, and the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers for scanning and making available building codes and fire codes which these organizations consider their copyrighted property. The case was heard in the District Court of the District of Columbia, with Judge Tanya S. Chutkan presiding. Chutkan ruled against Public.Resource.Org and ordered Malamud to delete all the standards from the Internet. Public.Resource.Org appealed the case to the D.C. Circuit. In 2018, the D.C. Circuit reversed and remanded the decision, holding that the fair use doctrines had been improperly applied. In March 2022 Chutkan issued an opinion that would allow Public.Resource.Org to reproduce 184 standards under fair use, partially reproduce 1 standard, and deny reproduction of 32 standards that were found to differ in substantive ways from those incorporated by law. ASTM et al. appealed the case to the D.C. Circuit, which affirmed the trial court decision.

References

  1. ↑ "Internet Talk Radio". museum.media.org. Archived from the original on April 26, 2010. Retrieved May 30, 2010.
  2. ↑ "Securities and Exchange Commission". public.resource.org. Retrieved May 30, 2010.
  3. ↑ "Internet 1996 World Exposition" . Retrieved May 30, 2010.
  4. ↑ Malamud, Carl (September 1992). Exploring the Internet: A Technical Travelogue. Prentice Hall. p. 379. ISBN   0-13-296898-3. Archived from the original on May 13, 2008. Retrieved February 9, 2006.
  5. ↑ Malamud, Carl (August 8, 1997). A World's Fair for the Global Village. The MIT Press. p. 304. ISBN   0-262-13338-5.
  6. ↑ Baker, Mitchell (November 22, 2006). "Bob Lisbonne and Carl Malamud Join the Mozilla Foundation Board". The Weblog of Mitchell Baker. Retrieved May 27, 2008.
  7. ↑ Baker, Mitchell (May 22, 2007). "Carl Malamud and Public.Resource.Org". The Weblog of Mitchell Baker. Retrieved May 27, 2008.
  8. ↑ "About Public.Resource.Org". resource.org.
  9. ↑ "public.resource.org - ntis.gov". resource.org.
  10. ↑ "public.resource.org - gpo.gov". resource.org.
  11. ↑ "public.resource.org - oregon.gov". resource.org.
  12. ↑ Halverson, Nathan. "He's giving you access, one document at a time". The Press Democrat. Archived from the original on September 4, 2008. Retrieved September 4, 2008.
  13. ↑ O'Reilly, Tim (April 5, 2006). "Smithsonian Sunshine". O'Reilly Media, Inc. Retrieved May 27, 2008.
  14. ↑ Malamud, Carl (May 25, 2006). "Testimony of Carl Malamud". Hearing on Smithsonian Institution Business Ventures. United States House of Representatives. Retrieved May 27, 2008.
  15. ↑ Fallows, James (March 9, 2007). "Another win for Carl Malamud (or: news you won't see in the May 2007 issue of the Atlantic)". The Atlantic.com. Retrieved May 27, 2008.
  16. ↑ Malamud, Carl (February 27, 2007). "Congressional Hearings, Fair Use, and the Public Domain". public.resource.org. Retrieved May 27, 2008.
  17. ↑ Markoff, John (August 20, 2007). "A Quest to Get More Court Rulings Online, and Free". The New York Times . Retrieved May 27, 2008.
  18. ↑ Doctorow, Cory (February 25, 2009). "Yes We Scan! Carl Malamud for Public Printer of the USA".
  19. ↑ Malamud, Carl (July 1992). Analyzing Novell Networks (2nd ed.). Van Nostrand Reinhold. p. 340. ISBN   0-442-01302-7.
  20. ↑ Malamud, Carl (February 1989). Dec Networks and Architectures . J. Ranade Dec Series. Intertext Publications. p.  472. ISBN   0-07-039822-4.
  21. ↑ Malamud, Carl (September 4, 2015). "Petition to Her Majesty's Government on the Safety of Toys". Public.Resource.Org . Retrieved September 5, 2015.
  22. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Schwartz, John (February 12, 2009). "An Effort to Upgrade a Court Archive System to Free and Easy" . The New York Times. Retrieved January 12, 2013.
  23. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Singel, Ryan (October 5, 2009). "FBI Investigated Coder for Liberating Paywalled Court Records". Wired . Condé Nast. Retrieved January 12, 2013.
  24. 1 2 Lee, Timothy B.,The inside story of Aaron Swartz's campaign to liberate court filings, Ars Technica, February 8, 2013. Retrieved March 8, 2013.
  25. ↑ Will Wrigley (February 7, 2013). "Darrell Issa Praises Aaron Swartz, Internet Freedom At Memorial". Huffingtonpost.com. Retrieved February 21, 2013.
  26. ↑ Johnson, Bobbie (November 11, 2009). "Recap: Cracking open US courtrooms". The Guardian . London.
  27. ↑ Malamud, Carl (January 24, 2013). Aaron's Army (Speech). Memorial for Aaron Swartz at the Internet Archive. San Francisco.
  28. ↑ Malamud, Carl (March 30, 2013). "On Crime and Access to Knowledge: An Unpublished Essay".
  29. ↑ Electronic Frontier Foundation news article, Appeals Court Tells Georgia: State Code Can’t be Copyrighted, By Joe Mullin, published October 23, 2018, Article URL: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/10/appeals-court-tells-georgia-state-code-cant-be-copyrighted Retrieved April 1, 2019
  30. ↑ "Carl Malamud, Public Printer". Columbia Journalism Review. Retrieved April 29, 2020.
  31. ↑ Los Angeles Times (July 27, 2015). "Georgia claims that publishing its state laws for free online is 'terrorism'". Los Angeles Times .
  32. ↑ "Georgia accuses public records activist of information 'terrorism'". ajc.com.
  33. ↑ Page 5 of Case: 17-11589, Filed: October 19, 2018, United States Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit, CODE REVISION COMMISSION, for the Benefit of and on behalf of General Assembly of Georgia, STATE OF GEORGIA vs PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC., 55 pages, Document URL: http://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/201711589.pdf Retrieved April 1, 2019
  34. ↑ Liptak, Adam (May 13, 2019). "Accused of 'Terrorism' for Putting Legal Materials Online". The New York Times.
  35. ↑ St. Denis, Nick (January 26, 2016). "Cases Shed Light on Copyright Protection of Standards Developers".
  36. 1 2 3 4 Jones, Tim (March 2, 2009). "Yes We Scan: Carl Malamud for Public Printer". eff.org. Retrieved October 13, 2013.
  37. 1 2 Bishop, Katina (October 6, 2009). "Hardware Hacker, E-Voting Investigator, and Public Domain Advocate Win Pioneer Awards". eff.org. Electronic Frontier Foundation . Retrieved October 13, 2013.
  38. ↑ "10 Rules for Radicals: Lessons from rogue archivist Carl Malamud". boingboing.net. August 29, 2010. Retrieved June 17, 2018.
  39. ↑ ""10 Rules for Radicals": making PSI more accessible". communia-project.eu. COMMUNIA - The European Thematic Network on the Digital Public Domain. Retrieved June 17, 2018.
  40. ↑ Carl Malamud (2010). 10 Rules for Radicals.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.