Christopher Udry

Last updated
Christopher Udry
Born
Christopher R. Udry
OccupationEconomist
Website https://sites.northwestern.edu/christopherudry/

Christopher R. Udry is an American economist who currently serves as King Professor of Economics at Northwestern University. Udry is the co-founder (with Dean Karlan) and current co-director of the Global Poverty Research Lab at the Kellogg School of Management. Udry's research focuses mostly on development economics, in particular rural development in Sub-Saharan Africa, to which he owes his position as one of the world's most prominent agricultural economists. [1] [2]

Contents

Biography

After earning a B.A. in economics from Swarthmore College in 1981, Udry taught for two years as a secondary school teacher in Tamale, Ghana. Thereafter, he went on to earn a Ph.D. from Yale University in 1991, for which he studied rural credit in northern Nigeria, being a visiting research scholar at the Ahmadu Bello University in 1988-89. [3]

Following his graduation, Udry worked first as an assistant professor (1990–96) and then as an associate professor (1996–98) of economics at Northwestern University, and as visiting senior research scholar at the University of Ghana (1996–97), before becoming a professor of economics at Yale University (1998-2004) and being promoted to the position of Henry J. Heinz Professor of Economics (2004–17). In parallel, at Yale, he served as Director of the Economic Growth Center (2000–05), Chair of the Department of Economics (2006–10), and several times as Chair of the Council on African Studies. Finally, Udry returned to Northwestern University in 2017, where has since then been the Robert E. and Emily King Professor of Economics. [3]

Currently, Udry is serving on the boards of the Bureau for Research and Economic Analysis of Development and the Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab, and affiliated to the National Bureau of Economic Research as a research associate. In terms of professional service, he sits on the editorial boards of the Journal of Development Economics (since 1995), Econometrica (2001–09), Economic Development and Cultural Change (2004–09), American Economic Review (2005-09), and the Journal of Economic Perspectives (2013–16). Finally, his research contributions have been acknowledged by a fellowship in the Econometric Society in 2005 as well as membership in the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (since 2011). [4] In September 2017, Udry co-founded (with Dean Karlan) the Global Poverty Research Lab, a research center dedicated to the promotion of evidence-based poverty reduction, which he manages as co-director. [5]

Research

Udry's research concentrates on economic activities in rural Sub-Saharan settings, with a particular emphasis on rural financial markets in developing countries. According to IDEAS/RePEc, he belongs to the top 2% of most cited economists. [6] Udry's most cited research includes the following findings:

The use of credit as insurance in rural credit markets

Contrary to prevailing wisdom about credit markets in developing countries, which predicts these markets to be affected by moral hazard and adverse selection because of incomplete contracts and imperfect information, Udry finds information asymmetries between borrowers and lenders to be unimportant in rural credit markets in northern Nigeria, with information flowing freely between communities. By extension, the standard instruments used to address moral hazard and adverse selection in financial systems - collateral and interlinked contracts - are largely absent. Instead, households use credit as a form of insurance: by finetuning the repayment of loans to compensate for random production shocks affecting the borrower and/or the lender, households are able to pool risks. For example, if a borrower's household experiences an income shortfall in a given month due to e.g. an income earner being sick, the debtor household will reduce its monthly repayment. [7] [8]

Consumption smoothing with agricultural assets

How do farm households address the risk of income fluctuations and smooth their consumption? In northern Nigeria, Udry finds that households react to harvest shortfalls on their upland farm plots by selling their grain stocks (rather than their livestock) and prepare for such adverse shocks expected to occur in the near future by increasing their current saving. [9] Similarly, Udry (with Marcel Fafchamps and Katherine Czukas) finds that, unlike hypothesized by the academic literature, livestock plays only a minor role in Burkinabé households' consumption smoothing, as livestock sales compensate only ca. 15-30% of the shortfall in household income attributable to village-level shocks such as droughts. [10] More particularly, Udry finds (with Harounan Kazianga) that rural Burkinabé households appear to have been generally unable to effectively buffer their consumption against drought in 1981-85, with standard risk-coping strategies such as risk sharing and the use of assets as buffer stocks being either absent or insufficient. [11]

The adoption and diffusion of agricultural technologies

How do farmers learn about a new agricultural technology? Studying the adoption of pineapple farming - which requires carefully calibrated agricultural inputs - in Ghana, Udry and Timothy Conley argue that farmers' adoption of pineapple farming displays social learning based on the finding that farmers imitate the input settings of those farmers in their "information neighbourhood" that have been surprisingly successful in earlier seasons. In line with the hypothesis that social learning is only displayed in the context of adopting new farming technologies, farmers don't adjust their farming inputs to imitate successful the settings of successful "information neighbours" for crops like cassava or maize whose farming technologies are established and well-known. [12] [13] Financially, the diffusion of pineapple farming in Ghana is driven by real rates of return ranging from 205-350% per year compared to 30-50% in maize or cassava farming; these high rates of return, coupled with an average rate of return in Ghana's overall informal sector that Udry and Santosh Anagol find to be close to 60% further substantiates the Lucas puzzle, i.e. why capital tends to flow from developing countries to developed countries despite the former having far higher rates of return than the latter. [14]

Efficiency of the allocation of production inputs within households

Is households' agricultural production efficient, i.e. do households efficiently allocate their agricultural inputs (labour, fertilizer, etc.) across farm plots depending on its fertility? In many African households, different household members each control and farm distinct plots. Using detailed agronomic data on the inputs and returns of farm plots in rural Burkina Faso, Udry et al. document substantial inefficiencies in the allocation of agricultural production factors across plots controlled by different household members, which bear substantial implications for the design of agricultural policy in developing countries. [15] Udry estimates the output losses that are due to these inefficiencies to amount to ca. 6% of total household production. Most importantly, these inefficiencies suggest that not only the assumption of a unitary household model but even the (less restrictive) assumption of an efficient intrahousehold allocation of production factors is likely misleading, possibly because even decisions within households may be substantially affected by imperfect information or transaction costs. [16]

Risk as a determinant of agricultural investments

Investigating why small-scale farmers in developing countries fail to invest in activities with high expected returns such as the purchase and application of chemical fertilizer, Udry, Karlan, Osei and Osei-Akoto design an experiment in northern Ghana wherein farmers are randomly assigned to receive cash grants, opportunities to purchase or receive for free rainfall-indexed insurance, or a combination of the two. By contrast to the cash grant's small effect on agricultural investment, they find a strong demand for the insurance product and moreover observe that farmers are willing and able to invest into their farms even without the help cash grants if they are offered insurance; they thus conclude that the binding constraint on agricultural investment is uninsured risk, which can be catastrophic for farmers, and not a lack of liquidity. By extension, this implies that agricultural credit policies are unlikely to be effective in stimulating agricultural investment. Finally, Karlan et al. also show that even though there is sufficient demand to sustain a market for rainfall insurance in rural Ghana, a lack of trust, recency bias and the absence of payouts due to favourable rainfalls may erode participation in insurance markets despite its high benefits. [17]

In another study, which analyses the impact of ambiguous and contested land rights on agricultural investment and productivity in Akuapim-Mampong, Ghana, Christoher Udry and Markus Goldstein find that investments into the fertilization of land plots and, by consequence, these plots' productivity mirror the strength of the tenure rights of the individuals in control of the different plots. In turn, the strength of an individual's tenure rights with regard to a given plot of land depends on the individual's rank in the local political hierarchy. [18]

Selected publications

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Subsistence agriculture</span> Farming to meet basic needs

Subsistence agriculture occurs when farmers grow crops to meet the needs of themselves and their families on smallholdings. Subsistence agriculturalists target farm output for survival and for mostly local requirements, with little or no surplus. Planting decisions occur principally with an eye toward what the family will need during the coming year, and only secondarily toward market prices. Tony Waters, a professor of Sociology, defines "subsistence peasants" as "people who grow what they eat, build their own houses, and live without regularly making purchases in the marketplace".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sharecropping</span> Use of land by a tenant in return for a share of the crops produced

Sharecropping is a legal arrangement with regard to agricultural land in which a landowner allows a tenant to use the land in return for a share of the crops produced on that land.

Agricultural economics is an applied field of economics concerned with the application of economic theory in optimizing the production and distribution of food and fiber products. Agricultural economics began as a branch of economics that specifically dealt with land usage. It focused on maximizing the crop yield while maintaining a good soil ecosystem. Throughout the 20th century the discipline expanded and the current scope of the discipline is much broader. Agricultural economics today includes a variety of applied areas, having considerable overlap with conventional economics. Agricultural economists have made substantial contributions to research in economics, econometrics, development economics, and environmental economics. Agricultural economics influences food policy, agricultural policy, and environmental policy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economic Research Service</span> Component of the United States Department of Agriculture

The Economic Research Service (ERS) is a component of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and a principal agency of the Federal Statistical System of the United States. It provides information and research on agriculture and economics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Smallholding</span> Small farm, often for a single family

A smallholding or smallholder is a small farm operating under a small-scale agriculture model. Definitions vary widely for what constitutes a smallholder or small-scale farm, including factors such as size, food production technique or technology, involvement of family in labor and economic impact. Smallholdings are usually farms supporting a single family with a mixture of cash crops and subsistence farming. As a country becomes more affluent, smallholdings may not be self-sufficient, but may be valued for the rural lifestyle. As the sustainable food and local food movements grow in affluent countries, some of these smallholdings are gaining increased economic viability. There are an estimated 500 million smallholder farms in developing countries of the world alone, supporting almost two billion people.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Agriculture in Nigeria</span> Overview of agriculture in Nigeria

Maize, cassava, guinea corn, and yam are the major crops farmed in Nigeria, with 70% of the households engaged in crop farming. In the south, 7.3% of the households practice fishing, while 69.3% of the households own or raise livestock in northwest Nigeria.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Agriculture in Taiwan</span>

Agriculture is one of the main industries in Taiwan. It contributes to the food security, rural development and conservation of Taiwan. Around 24% of Taiwan's land is used for farming.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Agriculture in Ghana</span> Agricultural activity in Ghana

Agriculture in Ghana consists of a variety of agricultural products and is an established economic sector, providing employment on a formal and informal basis. It is represented by the Ministry of Food and Agriculture. Ghana produces a variety of crops in various climatic zones which range from dry savanna to wet forest which run in east–west bands across Ghana. Agricultural crops, including yams, grains, cocoa, oil palms, kola nuts, and timber, form the base of agriculture in Ghana's economy. In 2013 agriculture employed 53.6% of the total labor force in Ghana.

The agricultural policy of the United States is composed primarily of the periodically renewed federal U.S. farm bills. The Farm Bills have a rich history which initially sought to provide income and price support to US farmers and prevent them from adverse global as well as local supply and demand shocks. This implied an elaborate subsidy program which supports domestic production by either direct payments or through price support measures. The former incentivizes farmers to grow certain crops which are eligible for such payments through environmentally conscientious practices of farming. The latter protects farmers from vagaries of price fluctuations by ensuring a minimum price and fulfilling their shortfalls in revenue upon a fall in price. Lately, there are other measures through which the government encourages crop insurance and pays part of the premium for such insurance against various unanticipated outcomes in agriculture.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Agriculture in Benin</span>

Benin is predominantly a rural society, and agriculture in Benin supports more than 70% of the population. Agriculture contributes around 35% of the country's gross domestic product (GDP) and 80% of export income. While the Government of Benin (GOB) aims to diversify its agricultural production, Benin remains underdeveloped, and its economy is underpinned by subsistence agriculture. Approximately 93% of total agricultural production goes into food production. The proportion of the population living in poverty is about 35.2%, with more rural households in poverty (38.4%) than urban households (29.8%). 36% of households depend solely upon agricultural (crop) production for income, and another 30% depend on crop production, livestock, or fishing for income.

Rural economics is the study of rural economies. Rural economies include both agricultural and non-agricultural industries, so rural economics has broader concerns than agricultural economics which focus more on food systems. Rural development and finance attempt to solve larger challenges within rural economics. These economic issues are often connected to the migration from rural areas due to lack of economic activities and rural poverty. Some interventions have been very successful in some parts of the world, with rural electrification and rural tourism providing anchors for transforming economies in some rural areas. These challenges often create rural-urban income disparities.

Innovations for Poverty Action (IPA) is an American non-profit research and policy organization founded in 2002 by economist Dean Karlan. Since its foundation, IPA has worked with over 400 leading academics to conduct over 900 evaluations in 52 countries. The organization also manages the Poverty Probability Index.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Livestock</span> Animals kept for production of meat, eggs, milk, wool, etc.

Livestock are the domesticated animals raised in an agricultural setting in order to provide labour and produce diversified products for consumption such as meat, eggs, milk, fur, leather, and wool. The term is sometimes used to refer solely to animals who are raised for consumption, and sometimes used to refer solely to farmed ruminants, such as cattle, sheep, goats, and pigs. Horses are considered livestock in the United States. The USDA classifies pork, veal, beef, and lamb (mutton) as livestock, and all livestock as red meat. Poultry and fish are not included in the category. The latter is likely due to the fact that fish products are not governed by the USDA, but by the FDA.

Peasant economics is an area of economics in which a wide variety of economic approaches ranging from the neoclassical to the marxist are used to examine the political economy of the peasantry. The defining feature of the peasants are that they are typically seen to be only partly integrated into the market economy -— an economy which, in societies with a significant peasant population, is typically found to have many imperfect, incomplete or missing markets. Peasant economics treats peasants as something different from other farmers as they are not assumed to be simply small profit maximizing farmers; by contrast, peasant economics covers a wide range of different theories of peasant household behavior. These include various assumptions about the maximization of profits, risk aversion, drudgery aversion, and sharecropping. The assumptions, logic, and predictions of these theories are examined and the impact of subsistence is typically found to have important implications in terms of producers decisions about supply, consumption and price. Chayanov was an early proponent of the importance of understanding peasant behaviour arguing that peasants would work as hard as they needed in order to meet their subsistence needs, but had no incentive beyond those needs and therefore would slow and stop working once they were met. This principle, the consumption-labour-balance principle, implies that the peasant household will increase its work until it meets (balances) the needs (consumption) of the household. A possible implication of this view of peasant societies is that they will not develop without some external, added factor. Peasant economics has been seen as being an important area of study by some development economists, agricultural sociologists, and anthropologists.

The agricultural system in Sub-Saharan Africa is a predominantly small-scale farming system with more than 50% of the agricultural activity performed by women, producing about 60-70% of the food in this region. While women provide the majority of the labor in agricultural production, their access and control over productive resources is greatly constrained due to inequalities constructed by patriarchal norms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gender and food security</span>

Gender inequality both leads to and is a result of food insecurity. According to estimates, women and girls make up 60% of the world's chronically hungry and little progress has been made in ensuring the equal right to food for women enshrined in the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. Women face discrimination both in education and employment opportunities and within the household, where their bargaining power is lower. On the other hand, gender equality is described as instrumental to ending malnutrition and hunger. Women tend to be responsible for food preparation and childcare within the family and are more likely to be spent their income on food and their children's needs. The gendered aspects of food security are visible along the four pillars of food security: availability, access, utilization and stability, as defined by the Food and Agriculture Organization.

Mark Richard Rosenzweig is an economist and the Frank Altschul Professor of International Economics at Yale University, where he also directs the Economic Growth Center. Rosenzweig belongs to the world's most prominent agricultural and development economists, and is one of the leading scholars on the subjects of the economics of insurance and migration.

Digital agriculture, sometimes known as smart farming or e-agriculture, is tools that digitally collect, store, analyze, and share electronic data and/or information in agriculture. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations has described the digitalization process of agriculture as the digital agricultural revolution. Other definitions, such as those from the United Nations Project Breakthrough, Cornell University, and Purdue University, also emphasize the role of digital technology in the optimization of food systems.

Hans P. Binswanger-Mkhize was a Swiss economist. His research focused mainly on agricultural economics in developing countries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Awudu Abdulai</span> Ghanaian scholar (born 1958)

Awudu Abdulai is a Ghanaian agricultural and development economist, and professor at the Institute of Food Economics and Consumption Studies, University of Kiel, Germany. His research and teaching focus on issues related to poverty alleviation, food and nutrition security, consumer behavior, and sustainable agriculture.

References

  1. Webpage of Christopher Udry at Northwestern University. Retrieved February 6th, 2018.
  2. Christopher Udry ranks 2nd in the ranking of agricultural economists on IDEAS/RePEc. Retrieved February 22nd, 2018.
  3. 1 2 "Curriculum vitae of Christopher R. Udry on the website of Northwestern University. Retrieved February 6th, 2018" (PDF).
  4. "Curriculum vitae of Christopher R. Udry on the website of Northwestern University. Retrieved on February 6th, 2018" (PDF).
  5. Hurd Anyaso, H. (September 28th, 2017). Renowned economists launch Global Poverty Research Lab: Northwestern committed to making the University a global center for international development. Northwestern Now. Retrieved February 6th, 2018.
  6. "Economist Rankings - IDEAS/RePEc". ideas.repec.org.
  7. Udry, C. (1990). Credit Markets in Northern Nigeria: Credit as Insurance in a Rural Economy. World Bank Economic Review, 4(3), pp. 251-269.
  8. Udry, C. (1994). Risk and Insurance in a Rural Credit Market: An Empirical Investigation in Northern Nigeria. Review of Economic Studies, 61(3), pp. 495-526.
  9. Udry, C. (1995). Risk and Saving in Northern Nigeria. American Economic Review, 85(5), pp. 1287-1300.
  10. Fafchamps, M., Udry, C., Czukas, K. (1998). Drought and saving in West Africa: are livestock a buffer stock? Journal of Development Economics, 55(2), pp. 273-305.
  11. Kazianga, H., Udry, C. (2006). Consumption smoothing? Livestock, insurance and drought in rural Burkina Faso. Journal of Development Economics, 79(2), pp. 413-446.
  12. Conley, T., Udry, C. (2001). Social Learning Through Networks: The Adoption of New Agricultural Technologies in Ghana. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83(3), pp. 668-673.
  13. Conley, T.G., Udry, C.R. (2010). Learning about a New Technology: Pineapple in Ghana. American Economic Review, 100(1), pp. 35-69.
  14. Udry, C., Anagol, S. (2006). The Return to Capital in Ghana. American Economic Review, 96(2), pp. 388-393.
  15. Udry, C. et al. (1995). Gender differentials in farm productivity: Implications for household efficiency and agricultural policy. Food Policy, 20(5), pp. 407-423.
  16. Udry, C.R. (1996). Gender, Agricultural Production, and the Theory of the Household. Journal of Political Economy, 104(5), pp. 1010-46.
  17. Karlan, D. et al. (2014). Agricultural Decisions after Relaxing Credit and Risk Constraints. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(2), pp. 597-652.
  18. Goldstein, M., Udry, C. (2008). The Profits of Power: Land Rights and Agricultural Investment in Ghana. Journal of Political Economy, 116(6), pp. 981-1022.