Claude Frédéric t'Serclaes, Count of Tilly

Last updated

Claude Frédéric t'Serclaes, Count of Tilly
Claude Frederic T'Serclaes, duke of Tilly, painted by Johann Valentin Tischbein, ca 1750.jpg
Claude Frederic T'Serclaes, duke of Tilly, painted by Johann Valentin Tischbein, ca 1750
BornJuly 1648
Brussels, Spanish Netherlands
DiedApril 1723 (aged 7475)
Maastricht, Dutch Republic
Buried
Allegiance
Service / branch Dutch States Army
Years of service1667–1723
Rank Field marshal
Battles / wars

Claude Frederic t'Serclaes, Count of Tilly (July 1648 – April 1723) was a Dutch States Army officer and nobleman. He took part in the Franco-Dutch War, Nine Years' War and the War of the Spanish Succession and proved a brave and capable cavalry general. In 1708 he became the de facto supreme commander of the Dutch army, and led the Allied forces together with the Duke of Marlborough and Eugene of Savoy.

Contents

Early life

He was born in 1648 to Jean Werner T'Serclaes Tilly Marbais and Marie Françoise de Montmorency Robecq. He was a younger brother of Albert Octave who served Philip V of Spain, which would pit them against each other during the Battle of Ekeren. The grandfather of these brothers was a younger brother of Johann Tserclaes, Count of Tilly of the Thirty Years War. In 1667 Tilly entered Spanish service, but switched to Dutch service in 1672, even though he was a Catholic. [1]

Early Wars

The Corpses of the De Witt Brothers Jan de Baen- De lijken van de gebroeders de Witt.jpg
The Corpses of the De Witt Brothers

In 1672, during the Rampjaar , he was stationed in The Hague with a number of horsemen. There he tried to stop the murder of Cornelis de Witt and Johan de Witt by an angry mob, but was ordered to retreat. An order he very reluctantly followed. "I will obey," Tilly spoke, "but now the De Witts are dead men." It is possible that Tilly enlarged his role in this event during the Second Stadtholderless Period, but if true, this controversial incident seems to indicate that the lynching was prepared by Orangists from higher up and was not a spontaneous affair. [2] Tilly would harbor anti-orangist feelings for the rest of his life. This while most of the officers and soldiers in the army were Orangists. [3]

In 1673, under the orders of de Fariaux, he took part in the defence of Maastricht against Louis XIV and was seriously wounded. In 1674, serving under William of Orange, he was again seriously wounded at Seneffe. After the battle, where he fought for two hours before being wounded by a shot to the face, the bullet lodging in his neck for the rest of his life, Count Tilly was left among the fallen, his rich attire and weapons stripped by looters. By chance, the steward of William of Orange passed by, noticing signs of life in the wounded count, though he remained unrecognized. Orders were swiftly given to transport him to a hospital in Mons, where he lingered for three days, teetering between life and death, receiving care as an unknown soldier due to his lack of identification and stripped possessions. It wasn't until a rosary bearing his coat of arms was found that his true identity was revealed. When he was recognized, he received proper treatment and, in due time, recovered to resume his military duties. [4]

In 1675 he was present at the capture of Binche and the next year he took part in the Siege of Maastricht. At the Battle of Cassel, in 1677, Count Tilly successfully safeguarded seven battalions of infantry and two cavalry companies by decisively defeating six squadrons of elite French cavalry, compelling them to retreat in disarray. In addition to capturing multiple French officers during the same encounter. In 1678 at the Battle of Saint-Denis; Tilly took part in the attack on Casteau. Despite sustaining injuries, his brave conduct warranted his promotion to colonel of a regiment of cavalry. [4]

In the following Nine Years' War he was present at the battle of Walcourt. [5] In 1691, promoted to major general, his rear-guard of cavalry, consisting of just 3,000 men, was attacked in the Battle of Leuze by a larger force under Villars and Marsilly. [6] The fight went badly for the Allied cavalry and its reputation, but reinforcements under Hendrik van Nassau-Ouwerkerk eventually managed to push the French back. [7] In 1692 he fought at the Battle of Steenkerque. [5] Tree years later he was made lieutenant general of the cavalry. [8]

War of the Spanish Succession

Parade of Dutch soldiers with captured French and Bavarian banners after the Battle of Ekeren, by Jan Hoynck van Papendrecht Parade of captured French and Bavarian banners after the battle of Ekeren on 30 June 1703.jpg
Parade of Dutch soldiers with captured French and Bavarian banners after the Battle of Ekeren, by Jan Hoynck van Papendrecht

In the spring of 1702, at the start of the War of the Spanish Succession he was placed with a small army around the German city of Xanten. The French under Boufflers tried to ambush him there with a superior force but Tilly narrowly escaped the maneuver and united his forces with those of the Earl of Athlone. An act which earned him much praise. [9] Under Athlone the combined army was then able to prevent the fall of Nijmegen. [10]

The following year he served under Jacob van Wassenaer Obdam near Antwerp and fought in the Battle of Ekeren. Their small Dutch force was surrounded by a much larger Franco-Spanish army and Obdam fled, thinking his army was destroyed. The Lord of Slangenburg and Tilly however took over command and managed to force back the Franco-Spanish troops and break the encirclement. [1] [11] During this battle Tilly's older brother commanded a corps on the Franco-Spanish side. [12]

Allied battle order at Malplaquet. Tilly is mentioned as one of the supreme commanders. Slag bij Malplaquet, 1709, RP-P-OB-83.419.jpg
Allied battle order at Malplaquet. Tilly is mentioned as one of the supreme commanders.

In the ensuing campaigns, Tilly served under Ouwerkerk and became general of the Dutch cavalry in 1704, proving to be one of the most skilful and dependable cavalry commanders of the Allied army. [13] He took part in the Battle of Ramillies and the Battle of Oudenarde and played a very important role during both battles. When field marshal Ouwerkerk died in 1708, during Siege of Lille, Tilly became de facto supreme commander of the Dutch army in the Netherlands. The Dutch States General didn't promote him to that position officially, because that would offend the Frisians and Groningers who wanted their stadtholder, John William Friso, the Prince of Orange, in that position. [14] Tilly did not possess the authority that Ouwerkerk had enjoyed. Although Ouwerkerk lacked the prestige of Marlborough, he had been the undisputed Dutch military commander and had played a significant role in the victories achieved. In contrast, despite his achievements, Tilly remained completely overshadowed by the Duke of Marlborough and Eugene of Savoy, lacking the stature to assert himself as the leader of the Dutch generals. [15]

Together with Marlborough and Eugene, as head of the Dutch forces, Tilly defeated the French at Malplaquet. Tilly led the entire left wing, at least in name; for he had anti-orangist sympathies, while his officers were largely on the side of the Prince of Orange, and obeyed him more than they obeyed Tilly. [3] Tilly thus seems to have had little tactical influence throughout the battle. [16] He didn't participate in the Dutch infantry assault led by the Prince of Orange, [17] although he was heavily involved in the cavalry action in the latter stage of the battle. [13] The Dutch army suffered very heavy casualties that day, with 10,000 men killed or wounded. [18] After the battle, Tilly tasked himself with finding the wounded who still lay on the battlefield and drew up a detailed list of the Dutch casualties. [19]

In 1710 he and Marlborough again commanded the Anglo-Dutch army. Combined with the army of Eugene of Savoy, it was larger than ever before, totalling 165,000 men. The campaign was accompanied by many difficulties, but the allies managed to capture Douai, Béthune, Saint-Venant and Aire. Still, success was limited. The Allies had failed to penetrate the French fortress ring despite all their efforts. [20] The following year, Eugene and most of the Imperial troops were recalled from the Spanish Netherlands. The combined Anglo-Dutch field army under Marlborough and Tilly, consisting of 100,000 men, was smaller than last year's and now only able to capture Bouchain. [21]

Sicco van Goslinga, one of the Dutch deputies, described him as follows in 1711:

...his advanced age does not make him well-suited for vigorous actions. Defense would be more his strength; indeed, throughout the war, he has not shown great evidence of the activity and vigor so necessary for military actions, especially in an offensive. Nevertheless, he is wise, moderate, experienced, and very brave personally. [22]

An assessment which is supported by the Dutch military historian Jan Willem Wijn. [22]

In 1712, Count Tilly was unable to take command due to an illness. His duties were taken over by Lord Albemarle and the Hereditary Prince of Hesse-Kassel. [23]

After the Peace of Utrecht

Tilly was rewarded the post of governor of Namur in 1713. The next year he was transferred to the same position in 's-Hertogenbosch and in 1718 he was awarded with the governorship of the fortress town of Maastricht. [24]

Personal life

Tilly married Anne Antoinette d'Aspremont-Lynden countess of Reckheim. Anne often stayed with him in the field and had even been captured once at the Battle of Ekeren. [1] In 1723 Tilly died and was buried at the Basilica of Saint Servatius in Maastricht. [5]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Malplaquet</span> 1709 Spanish Succession War battle

The Battle of Malplaquet took place on 11 September 1709 during the War of the Spanish Succession, near Taisnières-sur-Hon in modern France, then part of the Spanish Netherlands. A French army of around 75,000 men, commanded by the Duke of Villars, engaged a Grand Alliance force of 86,000 under the Duke of Marlborough. In one of the bloodiest battles of the 18th century, the Allies won a narrow victory, but suffered heavy casualties.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Oudenarde</span> Battle in the War of the Spanish Succession

The Battle of Oudenarde, also known as the Battle of Oudenaarde, was a major engagement of the War of the Spanish Succession, pitting a Anglo-Dutch force consisting of eighty thousand men under the command of the Duke of Marlborough, Lord Overkirk and Prince Eugene of Savoy against a French force of eighty-five thousand men under the command of the Duc de Bourgogne and the Duc de Vendôme, the battle resulting in a great victory for the Grand Alliance. The battle was fought near the city of Oudenaarde, at the time part of the Spanish Netherlands, on 11 July 1708. With this victory, the Grand Alliance ensured the fall of various French territories, giving them a significant strategic and tactical advantage during this stage of the war. The battle was fought in the later years of the war, a conflict that had come about as a result of English, Dutch and Habsburg apprehension at the possibility of a Bourbon succeeding the deceased King of Spain, Charles II, and combining their two nations and empires into one.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anthonie Heinsius</span> Dutch statesman (1641–1720)

Anthonie Heinsius was a Dutch statesman who served as Grand Pensionary of Holland from 1689 to his death in 1720. Heinsius was an able negotiator and one of the greatest and most obstinate opponents of the expansionist policies of Louis XIV of France. He was one of the driving forces behind the anti-French coalitions of the Nine Years' War (1688–97) and the War of the Spanish Succession (1701–14).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Elixheim</span> 1705 conflict in the War of the Spanish Succession

At the Battle of Elixheim, 18 July 1705, also known as the Passage of the Lines of Brabant during the War of the Spanish Succession, the Anglo-Dutch forces of the Grand Alliance, under the Duke of Marlborough, successfully broke through the French Lines of Brabant. These lines were an arc of defensive fieldworks stretching in a seventy-mile arc from Antwerp to Namur. Although the Allies were unable to bring about a decisive battle, the breaking and subsequent razing of the lines would prove critical to the Allied victory at Ramillies the next year.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Ekeren</span> Part of the War of the Spanish Succession (1703)

The Battle of Ekeren, which took place on 30 June 1703, was a battle of the War of the Spanish Succession. A Bourbon army of around 24,000 men, consisting of troops from France, Spain and Cologne, surrounded a smaller Dutch force of 12,000 men, which however managed to break out and retire to safety.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Frederik Johan van Baer</span> Dutch States Army officer

Frederik Johan van Baer, Lord of Slangenburg was a Dutch States Army officer. He served under William of Orange in the Franco-Dutch War and Nine Years' War. He was to become a controversial figure for his role in the War of the Spanish Succession. While a talented general, he possessed a very difficult character. Slangenburg was often at odds with his fellow generals, especially the Allied commander-in-chief, the Duke of Marlborough. The hero status he acquired as a result of his conduct in the Battle of Ekeren couldn't prevent his eventual dismissal during the 1705 campaign. Leading writer Thomas Lediard to remark that Slangenburg: lost by his tongue what he had gained by his sword.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sicco van Goslinga</span> Dutch States Army officer and politician

Sicco van Goslinga was a nobleman and politician who served as a field deputy of the States-General of the Dutch Republic in the Dutch States Army. From 1706 to 1709 and in 1711 he served alongside John Churchill, 1st Duke of Marlborough during his campaigns in Flanders in the War of the Spanish Succession. His memoirs form an important source of information for historians of the period.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Bouchain (1712)</span>

The siege of Bouchain, was a siege of the War of the Spanish Succession, and a victory for the French troops of the Duc de Villars. A French army of 20,000 men besieged and captured the Allied-controlled fortifications after an 18-day siege, with the 2,000-strong Dutch-Imperial garrison under Major-General Frederik Sirtema van Grovestins capitulating on 19 October.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Zoutleeuw</span> 1705 siege at Zoutleeuw during the War of the Spanish Succession

The siege of Zoutleeuw or the siege of Léau was a siege of the War of the Spanish Succession. Allied troops with 16 artillery pieces under the command of the English Captain general the Duke of Marlborough, besieged and captured the small French-held Brabantine fortified town of Zoutleeuw in the Spanish Netherlands.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Ostend (1706)</span> 1706 siege

The siege of Ostend took place during the War of the Spanish Succession. In the wake of the Allied victory over the French at the Battle of Ramillies in May 1706, town and cities across the Spanish Netherlands rapidly surrendered to the Duke of Marlborough's victorious forces often without a fight. Ostend, a port on the North Sea coast, offered more resistance.

The field deputies were the representatives of the various Dutch sovereign provinces in the armies of the Dutch Republic. They represented, usually in numbers of five or nine, the highest authority in the country within the Dutch States Army, and ensured that the orders of the Dutch States General were respected and above all that the privileges of the provinces and cities were respected, to which they were generally very zealous. The deputies were also charged with maintaining discipline of war, curbing all excesses and enforcing the military laws, conducting or ordering inspections of the troops, as well as ensuring the provisioning and supply of the troops. In rare cases, they also directly commanded troops in battle.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bombardment of Arras</span> 1712 engagement of the War of the Spanish Succession

The bombardment of Arras was an engagement of the War of the Spanish Succession which took place on 2–3 March 1712. A Grand Alliance army under the command of Arnold van Keppel, 1st Earl of Albemarle closed in on Arras with the aim of destroying the supplies held there. The Allies intended for this to prevent the French from fending off sieges of Arras and Cambrai. Although the Allied succeeded, the advantages gained to them were ultimately unexploited due to Austrian troops arriving too late to the Allied army.

Frederik Sirtema van Grovestins was a Dutch States Army officer. He advanced through the various ranks in the army, from captain and cavalry captain (Ritmeester) to lieutenant-general of cavalry. Furthermore, he became general-quarter-master of the army and colonel of a regiment on foot at the repartition of Zeeland. In 1712 he became governor of Bouchain, in 1718 of Bergen-op-Zoom.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Frederick Christiaan van Reede, 2nd Earl of Athlone</span> Dutch States Army officer, diplomat and nobleman

Frederick Christiaan van Reede, 2nd Earl of Athlone was a Dutch States Army officer, diplomat and nobleman who fought during the Nine Years' War and the War of the Spanish Succession.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Daniël van Dopff</span>

Daniël Wolf baron van Dopf was a Dutch States Army officer and nobleman. He was, among other things, general of the cavalry of the Dutch army during the War of the Spanish Succession, Quartermaster general of that army, and later commander and governor of the fortress of Maastricht.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Stekene</span> Part of the War of the Spanish Succession (1703)

The Battle of Stekene took place on 27 June 1703, during the War of the Spanish Succession, when a Dutch force of 7,000 men, under Karel Willem Sparre, attacked the Franco-Spanish defensive that ran from Ostend to Antwerp. The lines at Stekene were defended by 2,500 French soldiers under La Mothe and 1,500 to 6,000 local Flemish farmers. After a 3-hour long battle, the French abandoned their posts, which allowed the Dutch to capture the defensive works. The Dutch then attacked and captured the village of Stekene itself where the local farmers fiercely resisted.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Douai (1710)</span>

The siege of Douai, which lasted from 22 April 1710 until the capitulation of the garrison under lieutenant-general François Zénobe Philippe Albergotti on 25 June 1710 was part of the Allied Campaign of 1710 in the War of the Spanish Succession. The siege was conducted under the joint command of the Princ of Orange and Leopold I, Prince of Anhalt-Dessau and successfully concluded despite the fact that halfway through the French army under marshal Claude Louis Hector de Villars, 1st Duke of Villars made an attempt to relieve the fortress city, which led to an indecisive stand-off for four days with the Allied Army under John Churchill, 1st Duke of Marlborough and Prince Eugene of Savoy. After Douai the Allies went on to besiege Béthune.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Karel Willem Sparre</span>

Willem Karel, Baron of Sparre, was a Dutch States Army officer and nobleman. In this capacity, he took part in the Nine Years' War and played a prominent role in the War of the Spanish Succession. He would die of an injury sustained during the bloody Battle of Malplaquet.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Venlo (1702)</span> Military siege by the Grand alliance against French troops

The siege of Venlo was a 12-day siege of the city of Venlo commenced by the Grand Alliance which saw the city being taken after being occupied by French troops the year before. The siege of Venlo in 1702 was one of many sieges that Venlo had endured throughout its history.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Assault on Brussels (1708)</span>

The assault on Brussels or siege of Brussels occurred during the War of the Spanish Succession, from 22 to 27 November 1708 involving French and pro-Bourbon Spanish troops under Maximilian of Bavaria against the garrison and citizens of the city of Brussels.

References

  1. 1 2 3 The Spanish Succession n.d.
  2. Fruin 1867, p. 205 & 213.
  3. 1 2 Van Lennep 1880, p. 280.
  4. 1 2 Russel 1867, p. 9.
  5. 1 2 3 Blok & Molhuysen 1912.
  6. Nimwegen 2020, p. 220.
  7. Wijn 1956, p. 46.
  8. Falkner 2014, p. 93.
  9. Wijn 1956, p. 60-61.
  10. Wijn 1956, p. 100.
  11. Nimwegen 2020, p. 267.
  12. Wijn 1956, p. 308.
  13. 1 2 Falkner 2014, p. 93–94.
  14. Nimwegen 2020, p. 306.
  15. Nimwegen 1995, p. 232.
  16. De Graaf 2021, p. 153.
  17. MacDowall 2020, p. 21.
  18. Nimwegen 2020, p. 318.
  19. De Graaf 2021, p. 179 & 185.
  20. Nimwegen 2020, p. 323-330.
  21. Nimwegen 2020, p. 333-335.
  22. 1 2 Wijn 1964, p. 44.
  23. Wijn 1964, p. 125.
  24. Frey 1995, p. 445-446.

Sources