Coherent control

Last updated October 02, 2024

Coherent control is a quantum mechanics-based method for controlling dynamic processes by light. The basic principle is to control quantum interference phenomena, typically by shaping the phase of laser pulses.^[1]^[2] The basic ideas have proliferated, finding vast application in spectroscopy, mass spectra, quantum information processing, laser cooling, ultracold physics and more.

Brief History

The initial idea was to control the outcome of chemical reactions. Two approaches were pursued:

in the time domain, a "pump-dump" scheme where the control is the time delay between pulses^[3]^[4]
in the frequency domain, interfering pathways controlled by one and three photons.^[5]

The two basic methods eventually merged with the introduction of optimal control theory.^[6]^[7]

Experimental realizations soon followed in the time domain^[8] and in the frequency domain.^[9] Two interlinked developments accelerated the field of coherent control: experimentally, it was the development of pulse shaping by a spatial light modulator ^[10]^[11] and its employment in coherent control.^[12] The second development was the idea of automatic feedback control^[13] and its experimental realization.^[14]^[15]

Controllability

Coherent control aims to steer a quantum system from an initial state to a target state via an external field. For given initial and final (target) states, the coherent control is termed state-to-state control. A generalization is steering simultaneously an arbitrary set of initial pure states to an arbitrary set of final states i.e. controlling a unitary transformation. Such an application sets the foundation for a quantum gate operation.^[16]^[17]^[18]

Controllability of a closed quantum system has been addressed by Tarn and Clark.^[19] Their theorem based in control theory states that for a finite-dimensional, closed-quantum system, the system is completely controllable, i.e. an arbitrary unitary transformation of the system can be realized by an appropriate application of the controls^[20] if the control operators and the unperturbed Hamiltonian generate the Lie algebra of all Hermitian operators. Complete controllability implies state-to-state controllability.

The computational task of finding a control field for a particular state-to-state transformation is difficult and becomes more difficult with the increase in the size of the system. This task is in the class of hard inversion problems of high computational complexity. The algorithmic task of finding the field that generates a unitary transformation scales factorial more difficult with the size of the system. This is because a larger number of state-to-state control fields have to be found without interfering with the other control fields. It has been shown that solving general quantum optimal control problems is equivalent to solving Diophantine equations. It therefore follows from the negative answer to Hilbert's tenth problem that quantum optimal controllability is in general undecidable.^[21]

Once constraints are imposed controllability can be degraded. For example, what is the minimum time required to achieve a control objective?^[22] This is termed the "quantum speed limit". The speed limit can be calculated by quantizing Ulam's control conjecture.^[23]

Constructive approach to coherent control

The constructive approach uses a set of predetermined control fields for which the control outcome can be inferred.

The pump dump scheme ^[3]^[4] in the time domain and the three vs one photon interference scheme in the frequency domain ^[5] are prime examples. Another constructive approach is based on adiabatic ideas. The most well studied method is Stimulated raman adiabatic passage STIRAP ^[24] which employs an auxiliary state to achieve complete state-to-state population transfer.

One of the most prolific generic pulse shapes is a chirped pulse a pulse with a varying frequency in time.^[25]^[26]

Optimal control

Optimal control as applied in coherent control seeks the optimal control field for steering a quantum system to its objective.^[6]^[7] For state-to-state control the objective is defined as the maximum overlap at the final time T with the state $|\phi _{f}\rangle$ :

J=|\langle \psi (T)|\phi _{f}\rangle |^{2}

where the initial state is $|\phi _{i}\rangle$ . The time dependent control Hamiltonian has the typical form:

H(t)=H_{0}+\mu \cdot \epsilon (t)

where $\epsilon (t)$ is the control field. Optimal control solves for the optimal field $\epsilon (t)$ using the calculus of variations introducing Lagrange multipliers. A new objective functional is defined

J'=J+\int _{0}^{T}\langle \chi (t)|\left(i{\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}-H(\epsilon (t))\right)|\psi (t)\rangle dt+\lambda \int _{o}^{T}|\epsilon (t)|^{2}dt

where $|\chi \rangle$ is a wave function like Lagrange multiplier and the $\lambda$ parameter regulates the integral intensity. Variation of $J'$ with respect to $\delta \epsilon$ and $\delta \psi$ leads to two coupled Schrödinger equations. A forward equation for $|\psi \rangle$ with initial condition $|\psi (0)\rangle =|\phi _{i}\rangle$ and a backward equation for the Lagrange multiplier $|\chi \rangle$ with final condition $|\chi (T)\rangle =|\phi _{f}\rangle$ . Finding a solution requires an iterative approach. Different algorithms have been applied for obtaining the control field such as the Krotov method.^[27]

A local in time alternative method has been developed,^[28] where at each time step, the field is calculated to direct the state to the target. A related method has been called tracking ^[29]

Experimental applications

Some applications of coherent control are

Unimolecular and bimolecular chemical reactions.^[30]^[31]^[32]
The biological photoisomerization of Retinal.^[33]^[34]
The field of nuclear magnetic resonance.^[35]
The field of ultracold matter for photoassociation.^[36]
Quantum information processing.^[37]^[38]^[39]^[40]
Attosecond physics.^[41]^[42]

Another important issue is the spectral selectivity of two photon coherent control.^[43] These concepts can be applied to single pulse Raman spectroscopy and microscopy.^[44]

As one of the cornerstones for enabling quantum technologies, optimal quantum control keeps evolving and expanding into areas as diverse as quantum-enhanced sensing, manipulation of single spins, photons, or atoms, optical spectroscopy, photochemistry, magnetic resonance (spectroscopy as well as medical imaging), quantum information processing, and quantum simulation.^[45]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Charge qubit</span> Superconducting qubit implementation

In quantum computing, a charge qubit is a qubit whose basis states are charge states. In superconducting quantum computing, a charge qubit is formed by a tiny superconducting island coupled by a Josephson junction to a superconducting reservoir. The state of the qubit is determined by the number of Cooper pairs that have tunneled across the junction. In contrast with the charge state of an atomic or molecular ion, the charge states of such an "island" involve a macroscopic number of conduction electrons of the island. The quantum superposition of charge states can be achieved by tuning the gate voltage U that controls the chemical potential of the island. The charge qubit is typically read-out by electrostatically coupling the island to an extremely sensitive electrometer such as the radio-frequency single-electron transistor.

Resolved sideband cooling is a laser cooling technique allowing cooling of tightly bound atoms and ions beyond the Doppler cooling limit, potentially to their motional ground state. Aside from the curiosity of having a particle at zero point energy, such preparation of a particle in a definite state with high probability (initialization) is an essential part of state manipulation experiments in quantum optics and quantum computing.

Electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT) is a coherent optical nonlinearity which renders a medium transparent within a narrow spectral range around an absorption line. Extreme dispersion is also created within this transparency "window" which leads to "slow light", described below. It is in essence a quantum interference effect that permits the propagation of light through an otherwise opaque atomic medium.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ronnie Kosloff</span>

Ronnie Kosloff is a professor of theoretical chemistry at the Institute of Chemistry and Fritz Haber Center for Molecular Dynamics, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel.

Atomtronics Atomtronics is the emerging quantum technology of matter-wave circuits which coherently guide propagating ultra-cold atoms. The systems typically include components analogous to those found in electronic, quantum electronics or optical systems, such as beam splitter, transistors, atomic counterpart of Superconducting Quantum Interference Devices (SQUIDs). Applications range from studies of fundamental physics to the development of practical devices.

Picosecond ultrasonics is a type of ultrasonics that uses ultra-high frequency ultrasound generated by ultrashort light pulses. It is a non-destructive technique in which picosecond acoustic pulses penetrate into thin films or nanostructures to reveal internal features such as film thickness as well as cracks, delaminations and voids. It can also be used to probe liquids. The technique is also referred to as picosecond laser ultrasonics or laser picosecond acoustics.

The topological entanglement entropy or topological entropy, usually denoted by $, is a number characterizing many-body states that possess topological order.$

The Leggett–Garg inequality, named for Anthony James Leggett and Anupam Garg, is a mathematical inequality fulfilled by all macrorealistic physical theories. Here, macrorealism is a classical worldview defined by the conjunction of two postulates:

Macrorealism per se: "A macroscopic object, which has available to it two or more macroscopically distinct states, is at any given time in a definite one of those states."
Noninvasive measurability: "It is possible in principle to determine which of these states the system is in without any effect on the state itself, or on the subsequent system dynamics."

Within quantum cryptography, the Decoy state quantum key distribution (QKD) protocol is the most widely implemented QKD scheme. Practical QKD systems use multi-photon sources, in contrast to the standard BB84 protocol, making them susceptible to photon number splitting (PNS) attacks. This would significantly limit the secure transmission rate or the maximum channel length in practical QKD systems. In decoy state technique, this fundamental weakness of practical QKD systems is addressed by using multiple intensity levels at the transmitter's source, i.e. qubits are transmitted by Alice using randomly chosen intensity levels, resulting in varying photon number statistics throughout the channel. At the end of the transmission Alice announces publicly which intensity level has been used for the transmission of each qubit. A successful PNS attack requires maintaining the bit error rate (BER) at the receiver's end, which can not be accomplished with multiple photon number statistics. By monitoring BERs associated with each intensity level, the two legitimate parties will be able to detect a PNS attack, with highly increased secure transmission rates or maximum channel lengths, making QKD systems suitable for practical applications.

In quantum computing, and more specifically in superconducting quantum computing, a transmon is a type of superconducting charge qubit designed to have reduced sensitivity to charge noise. The transmon was developed by Robert J. Schoelkopf, Michel Devoret, Steven M. Girvin, and their colleagues at Yale University in 2007. Its name is an abbreviation of the term transmission line shunted plasma oscillation qubit; one which consists of a Cooper-pair box "where the two superconductors are also [capacitively] shunted in order to decrease the sensitivity to charge noise, while maintaining a sufficient anharmonicity for selective qubit control".

Quantum-optical spectroscopy is a quantum-optical generalization of laser spectroscopy where matter is excited and probed with a sequence of laser pulses.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Philip H. Bucksbaum</span> American atomic physicist

Philip H. Bucksbaum is an American atomic physicist, the Marguerite Blake Wilbur Professor in Natural Science in the Departments of Physics, Applied Physics, and Photon Science at Stanford University and the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory. He also directs the Stanford PULSE Institute.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Roberto Morandotti</span> Italian physicist

Roberto Morandotti is a physicist and full Professor, working in the Energy Materials Telecommunications Department of the Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique. The work of his team includes the areas of integrated and quantum photonics, nonlinear and singular optics, as well as terahertz photonics.

Richard Magee Osgood Jr. was an American applied and pure physicist. He was Higgins Professor of Electrical Engineering and Applied Physics at Columbia University.

A quantum heat engine is a device that generates power from the heat flow between hot and cold reservoirs. The operation mechanism of the engine can be described by the laws of quantum mechanics. The first realization of a quantum heat engine was pointed out by Scovil and Schulz-DuBois in 1959, showing the connection of efficiency of the Carnot engine and the 3-level maser. Quantum refrigerators share the structure of quantum heat engines with the purpose of pumping heat from a cold to a hot bath consuming power first suggested by Geusic, Schulz-DuBois, De Grasse and Scovil. When the power is supplied by a laser the process is termed optical pumping or laser cooling, suggested by Wineland and Hänsch. Surprisingly heat engines and refrigerators can operate up to the scale of a single particle thus justifying the need for a quantum theory termed quantum thermodynamics.

Quantum thermodynamics is the study of the relations between two independent physical theories: thermodynamics and quantum mechanics. The two independent theories address the physical phenomena of light and matter. In 1905, Albert Einstein argued that the requirement of consistency between thermodynamics and electromagnetism leads to the conclusion that light is quantized, obtaining the relation $. This paper is the dawn of quantum theory. In a few decades quantum theory became established with an independent set of rules. Currently quantum thermodynamics addresses the emergence of thermodynamic laws from quantum mechanics. It differs from quantum statistical mechanics in the emphasis on dynamical processes out of equilibrium. In addition, there is a quest for the theory to be relevant for a single individual quantum system.$

Many-body localization (MBL) is a dynamical phenomenon which leads to the breakdown of equilibrium statistical mechanics in isolated many-body systems. Such systems never reach local thermal equilibrium, and retain local memory of their initial conditions for infinite times. One can still define a notion of phase structure in these out-of-equilibrium systems. Strikingly, MBL can even enable new kinds of exotic orders that are disallowed in thermal equilibrium – a phenomenon that goes by the name of localization-protected quantum order (LPQO) or eigenstate order.

Patrick Mora is a French theoretical plasma physicist who specializes in laser-plasma interactions. He was awarded the 2014 Hannes Alfvén Prize and 2019 Edward Teller Award for his contributions to the field of laser-plasma physics.

Toshiki Tajima is a Japanese theoretical plasma physicist known for pioneering the laser wakefield acceleration technique with John M. Dawson in 1979. The technique is used to accelerate particles in a plasma and was experimentally realized in 1994, for which Tajima received several awards such as the Nishina Memorial Prize (2006), the Enrico Fermi Prize (2015), the Robert R. Wilson Prize (2019), the Hannes Alfvén Prize (2019) and the Charles Hard Townes Award (2020).

Anthony F. J. Levi is a British-born engineer and academic. He is professor of electrical and computer engineering at the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering of the University of Southern California (USC).

References

↑ Gordon, Robert J.; Rice, Stuart A. (1997). "Active control of the dynamics of atoms and molecules". Annual Review of Physical Chemistry. 48 (1): 601–641. Bibcode:1997ARPC...48..601G. doi:10.1146/annurev.physchem.48.1.601. ISSN 0066-426X. PMID 15012451.
↑ Shapiro, Moshe; Brumer, Paul (2000). "Coherent Control of Atomic, Molecular, and Electronic Processes". Advances in Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics. Vol. 42. Academic Press. pp. 287–345. doi:10.1016/s1049-250x(08)60189-5. ISBN 978-0-12-003842-8. ISSN 1049-250X.
1 2 Tannor, David J.; Rice, Stuart A. (1985-11-15). "Control of selectivity of chemical reaction via control of wave packet evolution". The Journal of Chemical Physics. 83 (10): 5013–5018. doi:10.1063/1.449767. ISSN 0021-9606.
1 2 Tannor, David J.; Kosloff, Ronnie; Rice, Stuart A. (1986-11-15). "Coherent pulse sequence induced control of selectivity of reactions: Exact quantum mechanical calculations". The Journal of Chemical Physics. 85 (10): 5805–5820. doi:10.1063/1.451542. ISSN 0021-9606. S2CID 94455480.
1 2 Brumer, Paul; Shapiro, Moshe (1986). "Control of unimolecular reactions using coherent light". Chemical Physics Letters. 126 (6): 541–546. doi:10.1016/s0009-2614(86)80171-3. ISSN 0009-2614.
1 2 Peirce, Anthony P.; Dahleh, Mohammed A.; Rabitz, Herschel (1988-06-01). "Optimal control of quantum-mechanical systems: Existence, numerical approximation, and applications". Physical Review A. 37 (12): 4950–4964. doi:10.1103/physreva.37.4950. ISSN 0556-2791. PMID 9899641.
1 2 Kosloff, R.; Rice, S.A.; Gaspard, P.; Tersigni, S.; Tannor, D.J. (1989). "Wavepacket dancing: Achieving chemical selectivity by shaping light pulses". Chemical Physics. 139 (1): 201–220. doi:10.1016/0301-0104(89)90012-8. ISSN 0301-0104.
↑ Baumert, T.; Engel, V.; Meier, C.; Gerber, G. (1992). "High laser field effects in multiphoton ionization of Na₂. Experiment and quantum calculations". Chemical Physics Letters. 200 (5): 488–494. doi:10.1016/0009-2614(92)80080-u. ISSN 0009-2614.
↑ Zhu, L.; Kleiman, V.; Li, X.; Lu, S. P.; Trentelman, K.; Gordon, R. J. (1995-10-06). "Coherent Laser Control of the Product Distribution Obtained in the Photoexcitation of HI". Science. 270 (5233): 77–80. doi:10.1126/science.270.5233.77. ISSN 0036-8075. S2CID 98705974.
↑ Weiner, A. M. (2000). "Femtosecond pulse shaping using spatial light modulators" (PDF). Review of Scientific Instruments. 71 (5): 1929–1960. doi:10.1063/1.1150614. ISSN 0034-6748. Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 April 2007. Retrieved 2010-07-06.
↑
Liquid Crystal Optically Addressed Spatial Light Modulator, Archived 2012-02-04 at the Wayback Machine
- Slinger, C.; Cameron, C.; Stanley, M.; "Computer-Generated Holography as a Generic Display Technology" Archived 2011-09-27 at the Wayback Machine , IEEE Computer, Volume 38, Issue 8, Aug. 2005, pp 46–53
↑ Kawashima, Hitoshi; Wefers, Marc M.; Nelson, Keith A. (1995). "Femtosecond Pulse Shaping, Multiple-Pulse Spectroscopy, and Optical Control". Annual Review of Physical Chemistry. 46 (1): 627–656. doi:10.1146/annurev.pc.46.100195.003211. ISSN 0066-426X. PMID 24341370.
↑ Judson, Richard S.; Rabitz, Herschel (1992-03-09). "Teaching lasers to control molecules". Physical Review Letters. 68 (10): 1500–1503. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.68.1500. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 10045147.
↑ Assion, A. (1998-10-30). "Control of Chemical Reactions by Feedback-Optimized Phase-Shaped Femtosecond Laser Pulses". Science. 282 (5390): 919–922. doi:10.1126/science.282.5390.919. PMID 9794756.
↑ Brif, Constantin; Chakrabarti, Raj; Rabitz, Herschel (2010-07-08). "Control of quantum phenomena: past, present and future". New Journal of Physics. 12 (7): 075008. arXiv: 0912.5121 . doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/12/7/075008 . ISSN 1367-2630.
↑ Tesch, Carmen M.; Kurtz, Lukas; de Vivie-Riedle, Regina (2001). "Applying optimal control theory for elements of quantum computation in molecular systems". Chemical Physics Letters. 343 (5–6): 633–641. doi:10.1016/s0009-2614(01)00748-5. ISSN 0009-2614.
↑ Palao, José P.; Kosloff, Ronnie (2002-10-14). "Quantum Computing by an Optimal Control Algorithm for Unitary Transformations". Physical Review Letters. 89 (18): 188301. arXiv: quant-ph/0204101 . doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.188301. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 12398642. S2CID 9237548.
↑ Rabitz, Herschel; Hsieh, Michael; Rosenthal, Carey (2005-11-30). "Landscape for optimal control of quantum-mechanical unitary transformations". Physical Review A. 72 (5): 052337. doi:10.1103/physreva.72.052337. ISSN 1050-2947.
↑ Huang, Garng M.; Tarn, T. J.; Clark, John W. (1983). "On the controllability of quantum-mechanical systems". Journal of Mathematical Physics. 24 (11): 2608–2618. doi:10.1063/1.525634. ISSN 0022-2488.
↑ Ramakrishna, Viswanath; Salapaka, Murti V.; Dahleh, Mohammed; Rabitz, Herschel; Peirce, Anthony (1995-02-01). "Controllability of molecular systems". Physical Review A. 51 (2): 960–966. doi:10.1103/physreva.51.960. ISSN 1050-2947. PMID 9911672.
↑ Bondar, Denys I.; Pechen, Alexander N. (2020-01-27). "Uncomputability and complexity of quantum control". Scientific Reports. 10 (1): 1195. arXiv: 1907.10082 . doi:10.1038/s41598-019-56804-1. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 6985236 . PMID 31988295.
↑ Caneva, T.; Murphy, M.; Calarco, T.; Fazio, R.; Montangero, S.; Giovannetti, V.; Santoro, G. E. (2009-12-07). "Optimal Control at the Quantum Speed Limit". Physical Review Letters. 103 (24): 240501. arXiv: 0902.4193 . doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.240501. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 20366188. S2CID 43509791.
↑ Gruebele, M.; Wolynes, P. G. (2007-08-06). "Quantizing Ulam's control conjecture". Physical Review Letters. 99 (6): 060201. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.060201. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 17930806.
↑ Unanyan, R.; Fleischhauer, M.; Shore, B.W.; Bergmann, K. (1998). "Robust creation and phase-sensitive probing of superposition states via stimulated Raman adiabatic passage (STIRAP) with degenerate dark states". Optics Communications. 155 (1–3): 144–154. doi:10.1016/s0030-4018(98)00358-7. ISSN 0030-4018.
↑ Ruhman, S.; Kosloff, R. (1990-08-01). "Application of chirped ultrashort pulses for generating large-amplitude ground-state vibrational coherence: a computer simulation". Journal of the Optical Society of America B. 7 (8): 1748–1752. doi:10.1364/josab.7.001748. ISSN 0740-3224.
↑ Cerullo, G.; Bardeen, C.J.; Wang, Q.; Shank, C.V. (1996). "High-power femtosecond chirped pulse excitation of molecules in solution". Chemical Physics Letters. 262 (3–4): 362–368. doi:10.1016/0009-2614(96)01092-5. ISSN 0009-2614.
↑ Somlói, József; Kazakov, Vladimir A.; Tannor, David J. (1993). "Controlled dissociation of I₂ via optical transitions between the X and B electronic states". Chemical Physics. 172 (1): 85–98. doi: 10.1016/0301-0104(93)80108-l . ISSN 0301-0104.
↑ Kosloff, Ronnie; Hammerich, Audrey Dell; Tannor, David (1992-10-12). "Excitation without demolition: Radiative excitation of ground-surface vibration by impulsive stimulated Raman scattering with damage control". Physical Review Letters. 69 (15): 2172–2175. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.69.2172. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 10046417.
↑ Chen, Yu; Gross, Peter; Ramakrishna, Viswanath; Rabitz, Herschel; Mease, Kenneth (1995-05-22). "Competitive tracking of molecular objectives described by quantum mechanics". The Journal of Chemical Physics. 102 (20): 8001–8010. doi:10.1063/1.468998. ISSN 0021-9606.
↑ Levis, R. J.; Rabitz, H. A. (2002). "Closing the Loop on Bond Selective Chemistry Using Tailored Strong Field Laser Pulses". The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 106 (27): 6427–6444. doi:10.1021/jp0134906. ISSN 1089-5639.
↑ Dantus, Marcos; Lozovoy, Vadim V. (2004). "Experimental Coherent Laser Control of Physicochemical Processes". Chemical Reviews. 104 (4): 1813–1860. doi:10.1021/cr020668r. ISSN 0009-2665. PMID 15080713.
↑ Levin, Liat; Skomorowski, Wojciech; Rybak, Leonid; Kosloff, Ronnie; Koch, Christiane P.; Amitay, Zohar (2015-06-10). "Coherent Control of Bond Making". Physical Review Letters. 114 (23): 233003. arXiv: 1411.1542 . doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.233003. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 26196798. S2CID 32145743.
↑ Prokhorenko, V. I. (2006-09-01). "Coherent Control of Retinal Isomerization in Bacteriorhodopsin". Science. 313 (5791): 1257–1261. doi:10.1126/science.1130747. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 16946063. S2CID 8804783.
↑ Wohlleben, Wendel; Buckup, Tiago; Herek, Jennifer L.; Motzkus, Marcus (2005-05-13). "Coherent Control for Spectroscopy and Manipulation of Biological Dynamics". ChemPhysChem. 6 (5): 850–857. doi:10.1002/cphc.200400414. ISSN 1439-4235. PMID 15884067.
↑ Khaneja, Navin; Reiss, Timo; Kehlet, Cindie; Schulte-Herbrüggen, Thomas; Glaser, Steffen J. (2005). "Optimal control of coupled spin dynamics: design of NMR pulse sequences by gradient ascent algorithms". Journal of Magnetic Resonance. 172 (2): 296–305. doi:10.1016/j.jmr.2004.11.004. ISSN 1090-7807. PMID 15649756.
↑ Wright, M. J.; Gensemer, S. D.; Vala, J.; Kosloff, R.; Gould, P. L. (2005-08-01). "Control of Ultracold Collisions with Frequency-Chirped Light" (PDF). Physical Review Letters. 95 (6): 063001. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.063001. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 16090943.
↑ García-Ripoll, J. J.; Zoller, P.; Cirac, J. I. (2003-10-07). "Speed Optimized Two-Qubit Gates with Laser Coherent Control Techniques for Ion Trap Quantum Computing". Physical Review Letters. 91 (15): 157901. arXiv: quant-ph/0306006 . doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.157901. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 14611499. S2CID 119414046.
↑ Larsen, T. W., K. D. Petersson, F. Kuemmeth, T. S. Jespersen, P. Krogstrup, and C. M. Marcus. "Coherent control of a transmon qubit with a nanowire-based Josephson junction." Bulletin of the American Physical Society 60 (2015).
↑ Scharfenberger, Burkhard; Munro, William J; Nemoto, Kae (2014-09-25). "Coherent control of an NV⁻ center with one adjacent ¹³C". New Journal of Physics. 16 (9): 093043. arXiv: 1404.0475 . doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/16/9/093043 . ISSN 1367-2630.
↑ Weidinger, Daniel; Gruebele, Martin (2007-07-01). "Quantum computation with vibrationally excited polyatomic molecules: Effects of rotation, level structure, and field gradients". Molecular Physics. 105 (13–14): 1999-20087. doi:10.1080/00268970701504335. S2CID 122494939.
↑ Corkum, P. B.; Krausz, Ferenc (2007). "Attosecond science". Nature Physics. 3 (6). Springer Science and Business Media LLC: 381–387. Bibcode:2007NatPh...3..381C. doi:10.1038/nphys620. ISSN 1745-2473.
↑ Boutu, W.; Haessler, S.; Merdji, H.; Breger, P.; Waters, G.; et al. (2008-05-04). "Coherent control of attosecond emission from aligned molecules". Nature Physics. 4 (7). Springer Science and Business Media LLC: 545–549. doi:10.1038/nphys964. hdl: 10044/1/12527 . ISSN 1745-2473.
↑ Meshulach, Doron; Silberberg, Yaron (1998). "Coherent quantum control of two-photon transitions by a femtosecond laser pulse". Nature. 396 (6708). Springer Science and Business Media LLC: 239–242. doi:10.1038/24329. ISSN 0028-0836. S2CID 41953962.
↑ Silberberg, Yaron (2009). "Quantum Coherent Control for Nonlinear Spectroscopy and Microscopy". Annual Review of Physical Chemistry. 60 (1): 277–292. doi:10.1146/annurev.physchem.040808.090427. ISSN 0066-426X. PMID 18999997.
↑ Glaser, Steffen J.; Boscain, Ugo; Calarco, Tommaso; Koch, Christiane P.; Köckenberger, Walter; et al. (2015). "Training Schrödinger's cat: quantum optimal control". The European Physical Journal D. 69 (12): 1–24. arXiv: 1508.00442 . doi: 10.1140/epjd/e2015-60464-1 . ISSN 1434-6060.