![]() | This article or section is in a state of significant expansion or restructuring. You are welcome to assist in its construction by editing it as well. If this article or section has not been edited in several days , please remove this template. If you are the editor who added this template and you are actively editing, please be sure to replace this template with {{ in use }} during the active editing session. Click on the link for template parameters to use. This article was last edited by The Navigators (talk | contribs) 3 seconds ago. (Update timer) |
A Controller of Site Safety or COSS is a person qualified by the British civil engineering company Network Rail to ensure safe practice for work occurring on or near railway tracks and infrastructure. Their primary role is to set up a 'safe system of work' (SSOW) to protect staff working on or near tracks from trains.
The PICOW is responsible for taking charge of the arrangements to ensure that you and anyone else in the group, is NOT put in a position of danger from approaching trains or movements.
Prior to 7 August 1999, this job role was referred to as "Person In Charge of Work" (PICOW). [2] [3] In February 1985 four railway workers of a six man crew clearing snow from points were struck and killed by a passing train. [4] The group had no defined leader and no appointed lookouts despite poor visibility due to falling snow. This incident, along with subsequent ones through the 1990s brought repeated focus on railway worker safety when on or near the tracks. [5] From April 1992, a PICOW was required to be appointed anytime workers were on or near the line, in response to these incidents, tasked with ensuring workers are kept safe from trains by appointing lookouts, arranging closure of tracks and other methods. [6]
Prior to starting work near or on the tracks, the COSS must give the group they are in charge of a safety briefing that explains the following: [7]
Prior to accessing the tracks, the COSS must also verify that all members of the group have valid Sentinel competency card. [a] The COSS is required to have direct supervision of the group, and must remain with them while on or near the tracks. [7]
The preferred safe systems of working where the staff are protected from line open to train movements, either by blocking some or all lines to traffic or controlling the distance the group is from the track (called Safeguarded/Fenced/Separated areas in order of consideration). This method was formerly called a Green Zone. This is the safest way of working due to the higher risks with trains moving at speed, although many incidents still happen within blocks.
Open Line working (formerly known as Red Zone) means the lines are open to train movements; this is seen as more risky than Safeguarded/Fenced/Separated areas, and is avoided in the rail industry where practicable.
The COSS is responsible for the safety of the entire group and is subject to prosecution should someone be killed or injured by their negligence.
To become a COSS, someone should have served a suitable period of time on the railways and undertake a five-day course. This is then followed by a period of mentoring by an experienced COSS and then independent regular assessments to ensure that the subject is competent to undertake their role safely and effectively.
The rules around performing the role of a COSS are stated in the Rule Book a set of documents issued to track staff detailing their duties. Since 2010, this has been Rule Book Handbook 7, General duties of a controller of site safety (COSS). [7]
A COSS is required to distinguish themselves on site by wearing a blue armlet/badge on the left arm or upper body on which the word "COSS" is printed in white text. They are prohibited from wearing this armlet/badge when not acting as a COSS. [7]
A Safe System of Work (SSOW) is the method that railway employees use to protect themselves from being struck by moving trains while working on or near train tracks.
Hierarchy [b] | Name [9] | Type [c] | Description | Other notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Safeguarded | Green zone | All tracks are closed to trains, including parallel tracks where work isn't occurring | Engineering trains and equipment moving at approximately 5 miles per hour (8.0 km/h) are permitted |
2 | Fenced | Green zone | A rigid barrier, plastic construction fencing or barricade tape prevents workers from exiting the area where tracks are closed and entering an open track [9] | |
3 | Separated | Green zone | A gap of 2 metres (6.6 ft) between the edge of the safe working area and an open line is maintained with a site warden [d] appointed [9] | |
4 | ATWS | Red zone | Warning to workers is given by lights and alarm tone of a Automatic Track Warning System (ATWS) [9] | ATWS systems can be temporary or permanently installed and operates automatically when turned on. |
5 | TOWS | Red zone | Warning given by alarm tone of Train Operated Warning System (TOWS) [9] | A British Rail designed, permanently installed, warning system that gives off an audible alarm tone with 25 seconds of warning, based off track circuits. |
6 | LOWS | Red zone | Warning given by sound and/or lights of a portable Lookout Operated Warning System (LOWS) device at work site operated by a human positioned to watch for trains away from the work site [9] | Unlike ATWS, a human must initiate the warning of a train approaching. |
7 | Lookout | Red zone | Warning is given by a human lookout at the work site, typically by sound of a horn or whistle [9] | Also referred to as 'unassisted lookout' in newer documentation |
Prior to 2010, these systems were commonly referred to and grouped as 'green zone' and 'red zone'. [9] Green zone referred to systems where the work site was protected from trains by closing the track [e] and red zone referred to systems where the tracks were still open to trains and workers would be required to move to a position of safety when trains approached. [9] In an effort to reduce confusion and simplify the rule book, the terms were phased out in 2010. [8] The hierarchy was also removed at this time, as it was largely rendered moot by instructions that required that the SSOW selected be most suitable to the task, circumstances and location of work. [8]
Network Rail has aimed to eliminate the usage of human lookouts, with a significant push occurring after an incident at Margam, where two track workers were struck and killed by a train. [10] At Margam, the six person crew had split into two groups, and the appointed lookout had remained with the other group. [11] A 2021 fatality near Surbiton station prompted Network Rail to accelerate these efforts. [12] In the June 2022 Network Rail Board meeting, it was acknowledged that lookout usage was already low as practical, with the majority of routes not using human lookouts. Total elimination was not realistic. [13] [14]
In 2025, the Rail Safety and Standards Board introduced updates to the Rule Book to further restrict the usage of lookouts. From December 2025, lookouts are only allowed when no other safe system of work is suitable, can not be used at night, during poor visibility or in/near tunnels. [15] Further train speeds must be under 25 mph (40 km/h), and there are no junctions that would allow the train to unexpectedly change tracks. [15] The usage of intermediate and distant lookouts [f] was also banned. [15] [7]