Corporate foresight

Last updated

Corporate foresight has been conceptualised by strategic foresight practitioners and academics working and/or studying corporations as a set of practices, a set of capabilities and an ability of a firm. It enables firms to detect discontinuous change early, interpret its consequences for the firm, and inform future courses of action to ensure the long-term survival and success of the company. [1] [2]

Contents

Motivation

To overcome three major challenges

There are three major challenges that make it difficult for organizations to respond to external change: [1]

Need

In addition to the need to overcome the barriers to future orientation a need to build corporate foresight abilities might also come from:

To operationalize the need for "peripheral vision", a concept closely linked to corporate foresight George S. Day and Paul J. H. Schoemaker developed a questionnaire with 24 questions. [7]

Implementation

The five practice dimensions

Based on case study research in 20 multinational companies, René Rohrbeck proposes a "Maturity Model for the Future Orientation of a Firm". Its five dimensions are:

The model is operationalised through 20 elements which have four maturity levels each. These maturity levels are defined and described qualitatively, i.e. by short descriptions that are either true or not true for a given organization. [1]

The three process steps

Organisations need to build foresight through three core process steps, which build on specific practices: [8] [9]

Corporate foresight can be expected to be a determinant of the quality of strategic conversation. [14] [15] It will also, in line with digitalisation of other organisational processes, be driven by online platforms that allow broadening the scope of the people who can get involved in defining new courses of action. [16]

Innovation management

Through an empirical investigation Rohrbeck identified three roles that corporate foresight can play to enhance the innovation management of a firm: [17]

The study also showed that only a small number of firms have implemented the third role. In the majority of firms the aims of an innovation development project that have been defined are not challenged after the initial decision has been taken. This carries the risk that changing environmental conditions threaten the success of the innovation in development. [17]

Additionally, von der Gracht and Vennemann have developed a portfolio-approach, the so-called 'Future-Fitness-Portfolio', which enables companies to qualitatively compare amongst others and identify organizational improvement potential. The authors base their framework on both, corporate foresight and innovation management. [19]

External search, understood as all organisational activities that involve the creation and recombination of knowledge from a wide range of external sources outside the boundaries of the firm, has recently been suggested as one of the key research frontiers for corporate foresight. [20] Corporate foresight utilising external search for knowledge entails the usage of novel methods to monitor external development. Among these novel methods, Social Media Analytics for external search for knowledge and open foresight that enable firms to tune in to weak signals and scan the periphery has been shown to hold particular potential. [21]

Benefits

Firms that have applied corporate foresight have received a number of benefits: [22] [23]

On a higher level it has been documented that firms will be able to [24]

More recently a longitudinal study, that tracked 83 companies over a period of 7 years, has found that firms that have the right maturity level of corporate foresight practices (high future preparedness) can expect an on average 33% higher profitability and a 200% higher market capitalisation growth, when compared to the average. [8]

Case studies

In recent years corporate foresight has become more professional and widespread. [25] [26] Documented examples of organizations applying corporate foresight practices include:

Such organizations typically use corporate foresight to support strategic management, identify new business fields [42] [43] and increase their innovation capacity. [17]

See also

Related Research Articles

A core competency is a concept in management theory introduced by C. K. Prahalad and Gary Hamel. It can be defined as "a harmonized combination of multiple resources and skills that distinguish a firm in the marketplace" and therefore are the foundation of companies' competitiveness.

The Delphi method or Delphi technique is a structured communication technique or method, originally developed as a systematic, interactive forecasting method that relies on a panel of experts. Delphi has been widely used for business forecasting and has certain advantages over another structured forecasting approach, prediction markets.

Scenario planning, scenario thinking, scenario analysis, scenario prediction and the scenario method all describe a strategic planning method that some organizations use to make flexible long-term plans. It is in large part an adaptation and generalization of classic methods used by military intelligence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Futures studies</span> Study of postulating possible, probable, and preferable futures

Futures studies, futures research, futurism research, futurism, or futurology is the systematic, interdisciplinary and holistic study of social/technological advancement, and other environmental trends; often for the purpose of exploring how people will live and work in the future. Predictive techniques, such as forecasting, can be applied, but contemporary futures studies scholars emphasize the importance of systematically exploring alternatives. In general, it can be considered as a branch of the social sciences and an extension to the field of history. Futures studies seeks to understand what is likely to continue and what could plausibly change. Part of the discipline thus seeks a systematic and pattern-based understanding of past and present, and to explore the possibility of future events and trends.

A technology roadmap is a flexible planning schedule to support strategic and long-range planning, by matching short-term and long-term goals with specific technology solutions. It is a plan that applies to a new product or process and may include using technology forecasting or technology scouting to identify suitable emerging technologies. It is a known technique to help manage the fuzzy front-end of innovation. It is also expected that roadmapping techniques may help companies to survive in turbulent environments and help them to plan in a more holistic way to include non-financial goals and drive towards a more sustainable development. Here roadmaps can be combined with other corporate foresight methods to facilitate systemic change.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Theodore Modis</span>

Theodore Modis is a strategic business analyst, futurist, physicist, and international consultant. He specializes in applying fundamental scientific concepts to predicting social phenomena. In particular, he uses the law of natural growth in competition as expressed by the logistic function or S-curve to forecast markets, product sales, primary-energy substitutions, the diffusion of technologies, and generally any process that grows in competition. He is a vehement critic of the concept of the Technological Singularity. He has suggested a simple mathematical relationship between Entropy and Complexity as the latter being the time derivative of the former.

Strategic foresight is a planning-oriented discipline related to futures studies. In a business context, a more action-oriented approach has become well known as corporate foresight.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Foresight (futures studies)</span> Term referring to various activities in futurology

In futurology, especially in Europe, the term foresight has become widely used to describe activities such as:

Technology forecasting attempts to predict the future characteristics of useful technological machines, procedures or techniques. Researchers create technology forecasts based on past experience and current technological developments. Like other forecasts, technology forecasting can be helpful for both public and private organizations to make smart decisions. By analyzing future opportunities and threats, the forecaster can improve decisions in order to achieve maximum benefits. Today, most countries are experiencing huge social and economic changes, which heavily rely on technology development. By analyzing these changes, government and economic institutions could make plans for future developments. However, not all of historical data can be used for technology forecasting, forecasters also need to adopt advanced technology and quantitative modeling from experts’ researches and conclusions.

Technology Intelligence (TI) is an activity that enables companies to identify the technological opportunities and threats that could affect the future growth and survival of their business. It aims to capture and disseminate the technological information needed for strategic planning and decision making. As technology life cycles shorten and business become more globalized having effective TI capabilities is becoming increasingly important.

Technology scouting is an element of technology management in which

Real-time Delphi (RTD) is an advanced form of the Delphi method. The advanced method "is a consultative process that uses computer technology" to increase efficiency of the Delphi process.

Ulrich Lichtenthaler is a German economist who is Professor of Management and Entrepreneurship at the International School of Management in Cologne. He held the Chair of Management and Organization at the University of Mannheim until March 2015.

Andy Hines is an American futurist, head of graduate studies in Foresight at the University of Houston, and author of several books on strategic foresight. Hines is a professional futurist, co-creator of the framework foresight method, Assistant Professor and Program Coordinator of the Graduate Program in Foresight at the University of Houston, Principal of foresight consulting firm Hinesight, and former organizational futurist at Kellogg Company and Dow Chemical. He has written extensively on futures studies, strategic foresight, foresight research methods, the role of organizational futurists, and the consumer landscape.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Noah Raford</span> American futurist

Noah Raford is an American futurist and specialist in public policy, strategy and emerging technologies. He is a founding executive of the Dubai Future Foundation and the Museum of the Future, and is currently the Futurist-in-Chief and Chief of Global Affairs at the Dubai Future Foundation. He was responsible for a project claiming to be the world's first fully functional 3D printed building and a blockchain strategy for Dubai.

The Trend Receiver Concept is a method for developing Customer Foresight and has been overall identified as an approach to develop foresight. At the core of the Trend Receiver Concept is the identification of suitable conversation partners, so called Trend Receivers, when developing foresight on the future demands and habits of consumers.

Customer foresight is a new field of applied research. It aims to understand future consumer preferences and wishes with regard to tomorrow's products and services. It does so by combining customer research and foresight research elements. Customer foresight can be conceived as an interaction with projected future markets through selected customers by understanding their wishes and attitudes, ideas and visions as well as their perception of signals and drivers of change. Even though the concept cannot predict the future, it enables companies to prepare for different future scenarios and thus improves strategy and decision-making processes.

Horizon scanning (HS) or horizon scan is a method from futures studies, sometimes regarded as a part of foresight. It is the early detection and assessment of emerging technologies or threats for mainly policy makers in a domain of choice. Such domains include agriculture, environmental studies, health care, biosecurity, and food safety.

Future-oriented technology analysis (FTA) is a collective term from futures studies for analyzing future technology and its consequences. It includes technology intelligence, technology forecasting, technology roadmapping, technology assessment, and technology foresight. Technology Futures Analysis or Technology Future Analysis (TFA) is a synonym.

William E. Halal is an American aerospace engineer, air force officer, academic, author, consultant, and speaker. He is Professor Emeritus of Management, Technology & Innovation at George Washington University as well as the Founder and President of TechCast, a web-based system that uses knowledge to forecast breakthroughs on emerging technologies and social trends.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Rohrbeck, Rene (2010) Corporate Foresight: Towards a Maturity Model for the Future Orientation of a Firm, Springer Series: Contributions to Management Science, Heidelberg and New York, ISBN   978-3-7908-2625-8
  2. Rohrbeck, René; Battistella, Cinzia; Huizingh, Eelko (2015). "Corporate foresight: An emerging field with a rich tradition" (PDF). Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 101: 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.002.
  3. De Geus, Arie (1997) The living company, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Mass, ISBN   978-1-57851-820-3
  4. Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. 2009. Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation. Organization Science, 20(4): 696-717.
  5. O'Reilly, C. A., Harreld, J. B., & Tushman, M. L. 2009. Organizational Ambidexterity: IBM and Emerging Business Opportunities. California Management Review, 51: 75-99.
  6. "Strategy Under Uncertainty". Harvard Business Review. 1997-11-01. Retrieved 2018-01-12.
  7. Day, G. S., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. 2005. Scanning the periphery. Harvard Business Review, 83(11): 135-148.
  8. 1 2 Rohrbeck, René; Kum, Menes Etingue (2018). "Corporate foresight and its impact on firm performance: A longitudinal analysis". Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 129: 105–116. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.013 .
  9. Højland, Jakob; Rohrbeck, René (2017-06-06). "The role of corporate foresight in exploring new markets – evidence from 3 case studies in the BOP markets" (PDF). Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. 30 (6): 734–746. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2017.1337887 . ISSN   0953-7325.
  10. Duin, Patrick A. van der; Hartigh, Erik den (2009-04-01). "Keeping the balance: exploring the link of futures research with innovation and strategy processes". Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. 21 (3): 333–351. doi:10.1080/09537320902750673. ISSN   0953-7325. S2CID   219639725.
  11. Gavetti, Giovanni; Menon, Anoop (2016-09-01). "Evolution Cum Agency: Toward a Model of Strategic Foresight". Strategy Science. 1 (3): 207–233. doi: 10.1287/stsc.2016.0018 . ISSN   2333-2050.
  12. Rhisiart, Martin; Miller, Riel; Brooks, Simon (2015). "Learning to use the future: developing foresight capabilities through scenario processes". Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 101: 124–133. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2014.10.015.
  13. Bezold, Clem (2010). "Lessons from using scenarios for strategic foresight". Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 77 (9): 1513–1518. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2010.06.012.
  14. Van der Heijden, Kees (2005). Scenarios: the art of strategic conversation (2nd ed.). Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN   978-0-470-02368-6. OCLC   56191771.
  15. Ramírez, Rafael; Wilkinson, Angela (2016). Strategic reframing: the Oxford scenario planning approach. Oxford University Press. ISBN   978-0-19-874569-3. OCLC   951230165.
  16. 1 2 Rohrbeck, René; Thom, Nico; Arnold, Heinrich (2015). "IT tools for foresight: The integrated insight and response system of Deutsche Telekom Innovation Laboratories". Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 97: 115–126. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.015. S2CID   154235179.
  17. 1 2 3 Rohrbeck, René; Gemünden, Hans Georg (2011). "Corporate foresight: Its three roles in enhancing the innovation capacity of a firm". Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 78 (2): 231–243. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2010.06.019. S2CID   153581035.
  18. Rohrbeck, René (2010-03-01). "Harnessing a network of experts for competitive advantage: technology scouting in the ICT industry". R&D Management. 40 (2): 169–180. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00601.x. ISSN   1467-9310. S2CID   154201060.
  19. von der Gracht, Heiko; Vennemann, Robert; Darkow, Inga-Lena (2010). "Corporate foresight and innovation management: A portfolio-approach in evaluating organizational development". Futures - the Journal of Policy Planning and Futures Studies. 42 (4): 380–393. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2009.11.023.
  20. Ehls, Daniel; Polier, Sara; Herstatt, Cornelius (2020). "Reviewing the Field of External Knowledge Search for Innovation: Theoretical Underpinnings and Future (Re-)search Directions". Journal of Product Innovation Management. 37 (5): 405–430. doi:10.1111/jpim.12549. hdl: 11420/7702 . ISSN   1540-5885. S2CID   225378237.
  21. Laurell, Christofer; Sandstrom, Christian (2021). "Social Media Analytics as an Enabler for External Search and Open Foresight—The Case of Tesla's Autopilot and Regulatory Scrutiny of Autonomous Driving". IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 69 (2): 564–571. doi: 10.1109/TEM.2021.3072677 . ISSN   0018-9391.
  22. Rohrbeck, René (2012). "Exploring value creation from corporate-foresight activities". Futures. 44 (5): 440–452. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2012.03.006. S2CID   154319892.
  23. Vecchiato, Riccardo (2015). "Creating value through foresight: First mover advantages and strategic agility" (PDF). Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 101: 25–36. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2014.08.016.
  24. Rohrbeck, René; Schwarz, Jan Oliver (2013). "The value contribution of strategic foresight: Insights from an empirical study of large European companies". Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 80 (8): 1593–1606. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2013.01.004. S2CID   154598925.
  25. Daheim, Cornelia; Uerz, Gereon (2008-05-01). "Corporate foresight in Europe: from trend based logics to open foresight". Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. 20 (3): 321–336. doi:10.1080/09537320802000047. ISSN   0953-7325. S2CID   38319249.
  26. Oliver Schwarz, Jan (2008). "Assessing the future of futures studies in management". Futures. 40 (3): 237–246. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2007.08.018.
  27. Hofmann, Rupert (2015). "Visionary competence for long-term development of brands, products, and services: The trend receiver concept and its first applications at Audi". Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 101: 83–98. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2014.06.005.
  28. Ruff, Frank (2015). "The advanced role of corporate foresight in innovation and strategic management — Reflections on practical experiences from the automotive industry". Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 101: 37–48. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2014.07.013.
  29. Darkow, Inga-Lena (2015). "The involvement of middle management in strategy development —Development and implementation of a foresight-based approach". Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 101: 10–24. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2013.12.002.
  30. Farrington, Ted; Henson, Keith; Crews, Christian (2012-03-01). "Research Foresights: The Use of Strategic Foresight Methods for Ideation and Portfolio Management". Research-Technology Management. 55 (2): 26–33. doi:10.5437/08956308X5502023. ISSN   0895-6308. S2CID   155162795.
  31. Knab, Sebastian; Rohrbeck, René (2009-11-29). "Strategic Foresight at General Electric: About the Ability to Mobilize all Employees to Manage Outbreaks in the Business Environment to Succeed (German: Strategische Frühaufklärung bei General Electric: Von der Fähigkeit alle Mitarbeiter zu Mobilisieren um Umbrüche im Unternehmensumfeld erfolgreich zu managen)". SSRN   1515343.
  32. Theis, D. (July 2006). "Pictures of the Future: An industrial foresight and innovation source". 2006 Technology Management for the Global Future - PICMET 2006 Conference. Vol. 2. pp. 837–869. doi:10.1109/picmet.2006.296619. ISBN   978-1-890843-14-4. S2CID   19573397.
  33. Rollwagen, Ingo; Hofmann, Jan; Schneider, Stefan (2008-05-01). "Improving the business impact of foresight". Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. 20 (3): 337–349. doi:10.1080/09537320802000070. ISSN   0953-7325. S2CID   12834353.
  34. Boe-Lillegraven, Siri; Monterde, Stephan (2015). "Exploring the cognitive value of technology foresight: The case of the Cisco Technology Radar". Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 101: 62–82. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.07.014 .
  35. "CORPORATE FORESIGHT AT CISCO: INTRODUCTION OF THE TECHNOLOGY RADAR". thecasecentre.org. Retrieved 2018-01-13.
  36. Rohrbeck, René; Arnold, Heinrich; Heuer, J (2007-02-12). "Strategic Foresight in Multinational Enterprises - A Case Study on the Deutsche Telekom Laboratories". ISPIM-Asia 2007 Conference.
  37. Heger, Tobias; Boman, Magnus (2015). "Networked foresight—The case of EIT ICT Labs". Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 101: 147–164. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.02.002 .
  38. 1 2 Lesourne, Jacques; Stoffaës, Christian (1996). La prospective stratégique d'entreprise: concepts et études de cas. Paris: InterEditions. ISBN   978-2-7296-0443-1. OCLC   34187441.
  39. "Living in the Futures". Harvard Business Review. 2013-05-01. Retrieved 2018-01-13.
  40. Jefferson, Michael (2012). "Shell scenarios: What really happened in the 1970s and what may be learned for current world prospects". Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 79 (1): 186–197. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.08.007.
  41. Braun, Karl; von der Gracht, Heiko (October 2018). "Assessing future readiness: how a private audit contributes to addressing foresight" (PDF). ECA Journal. No. 10. pp. 55–58.
  42. Rohrbeck, R., S. Mahdjour, S. Knab, T. Frese (2009) Benchmarking Report - Strategic Foresight in Multinational Companies Report of the European Corporate Foresight Group: Berlin, Germany
  43. Heger, Tobias; Rohrbeck, René (2012). "Strategic foresight for collaborative exploration of new business fields". Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 79 (5): 819–831. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.11.003. S2CID   155015492.

Scientific Journals