Court-martial of Billy Dean Smith

Last updated
Free Billy Dean Smith Button Free Billy Dean Smith Button.jpg
Free Billy Dean Smith Button

Private Billy Dean Smith was court-martialed by the U.S. Army in 1972 on charges of the premeditated murder of two officers and premeditated attempted murder of two other officers in Vietnam on March 15, 1971. He was charged with throwing a hand grenade into an officers' barracks at the Ben Hoa military base. All of the officers were white and Smith was Black. [1] [2] Smith had been open about his opposition to the war, which he felt was racist, and to the racism he felt he and other non-white GIs were experiencing in the military. Smith, his defense team and his supporters, argued this was the reason he was quickly held responsible for the explosion, even though they felt there was very little evidence to support the charges. [3] Smith's ultimate exoneration through military court-martial seemed to confirm his supporters arguments. This was the first trial in the U.S. where a defendant was charged with fragging, the deliberate or attempted killing of a soldier, usually a superior officer, by another soldier. [4] The term fragging emerged during the Vietnam War, when the occurrence of these incidents reached unprecedented numbers and were often committed or attempted using a fragmentation or hand grenade. [5] According to author George Lepre, there were 904 documented or suspected fragging incidents in Vietnam between 1969 and 1972 (see here for more detail). [6] Smith was also charged with assaulting a military police (MP) staff sergeant and with kneeing and spitting on another MP during his arrest. [1] His court-martial at Fort Ord in California took over two months while generating national and international press coverage. On November 14, 1972, Smith was found not guilty of all six counts of murder, attempted murder and assault. He was found guilty on the most minor charge of resisting arrest, but even this was subsequently overturned on appeal. He spent nearly two years in solitary confinement for "23 out of 24 hours of every day" for crimes he was found innocent of committing. Smith's treatment and confinement has been compared to that of First Lieutenant William L. Calley, Jr., the white Army officer who had been convicted of murdering innocent Vietnamese villagers at Mỹ Lai, and was allowed to live in private officer quarters, before, and even after, his conviction. [6] :56 [7]

Contents

Background

Smith, one of twelve children, was born in Bakersfield, California in 1948. He moved at an early age with his family to Texas for ten years, and then to the Watts area of Los Angeles in 1957. After graduating from Washington High School in 1967 he worked as a machinist, drove a school bus, sold cars and picked up jobs wherever he could until he was drafted into the Army in 1969. At that point, he was already opposed to the war in Vietnam, but respected his family's wishes that he not risk going to jail. He completed basic training and then Advanced Individual Training at Fort Sill in Oklahoma, and was sent to Vietnam in October 1970. In Vietnam, he very quickly felt he was being singled out for harassment for his race and lack of enthusiasm for the war. [3] As he put it, "I had stated time and time again that I realize that the war in Indochina was unjust and racially motivated, and most of all that I strictly hated all who had high regard for the habitual butchery of the Vietnamese people." [7] Within just a few months he had been given three Article 15 non-judicial punishments by his commanding officer for "minor infractions" and was being processed for discharge for "unsuitability and unfitness". According to Smith's commanding officer, he was unenthusiastic about "closing with the enemy". [3] One of Smith's Article 15 punishments was for unsatisfactory shaving, an offence often overlooked in front line combat zones. As an article in The Black Scholar put it, "Six months in Vietnam had gained Billy the reputation of having a 'bad attitude.' Billy Dean was not a 'good nigger.'" [7]

All of this came to a head after the grenade went off on March 15th. Smith's commanding officer, Captain Randall Rigby, arrived at the scene and immediately claimed he and his first sergeant, Billy Willis, "were the intended victims" because they "were to have slept in the barracks that night". More, the Captain and his first sergeant decided the "only logical guilty party was the black GI with the 'bad attitude', Billy Smith." First Sgt. Willis made explicit their reasoning during the court-martial: Smith "was the only man I had problems with and his was the first name that popped into my head". [7] With no concrete evidence, Rigby and Willis called a battalion formation and, within 90 minutes of the explosion, arrested Smith for murder and attempted murder in front of all the potential witnesses. [2] [3] [8]

Court-martial

Billy Dean Smith on the Cover of The Black Panther Newspaper September 1971 The Black Panther Newspaper Cover 25Sep1971.jpg
Billy Dean Smith on the Cover of The Black Panther Newspaper September 1971

Smith's court-martial began at Fort Ord in California on September 6, 1972. It drew media attention from around the United States and internationally because it was the first case of fragging ever tried in the U.S., plus the prosecution was arguing for the death penalty. The possibility for the death penalty was only taken off the table by the presiding judge when the trial started. [6] :55 [1] The case had also become widely known after being discussed in Congressional hearings the previous year as a prime example of the phenomenon of fragging in Vietnam. [9] Further, numerous antiwar groups and individuals, including Vietnam Veterans Against the War (VVAW), the United States Servicemen's Fund, the Black Panther Party, Angela Davis and others had been helping to rally support and funds for Smith's defense. [10] [11] Smith was represented pro bono by Luke McKissack, a well known civil rights lawyer, and the actor Burt Lancaster contributed money to his defense. [6] :56

The military jury was composed of "seven career officers", five white and two Black. [12] The prosecutions case included little direct evidence, relying mainly on circumstantial testimony. Rigby and Willis both testified that Smith was a "disciplinary problem" and they believed he hated them "enough to want to kill them". The defense countered with witnesses who testified that resentment against Rigby and Willis was "widespread among the troops." [13] [14] The defense agreed with the prosecution that Smith was charged "because he had been a disciplinary problem", and they also contended he was singled out because he was Black and openly against the war. [15] [16] The defense also pointed out that it made no sense for Smith to try to kill the very commanding officer who was trying to get him sent home for being a disciplinary problem. Louis Monaco, who was on Smith's defense team, explained the contradiction in a filmed interview: The "commanding officer decided that he must have been the target, because he was planning to send Billy home. Now, to us, that was absolutely absurd. If Billy thought he was being sent home...he would have swam home." [17]

The prosecution claimed to have an eye witness who had seen Smith running from the scene, but when the witness took the stand he "shocked" the prosecutor by saying, "The man I saw running was not Billy Dean Smith." [18] Other prosecution witnesses admitted on the witness stand they had been "intimidated by their superiors into making false statements" against Smith. [11] The prosecution also said a grenade pin had been found in Smith's possession that matched parts of the exploded grenade found at the scene. They called a crime lab technician who testified he "had linked a grenade pin found on Private Smith with [a] grenade lever found near the scene of the explosion." However, three expert defense witnesses countered this testimony saying it was not possible to be sure there was a match. One of them, "a firearms and tool marks identification expert for the Institute of Forensic Sciences" and former police officer said, "I can take two pins pulled apart at random...and make a better match than is represented here." [1] [11] There was also testimony that soldiers in Vietnam commonly carried spare grenade pins as a safety measure in case they had to disarm live grenades being held with their levers manually depressed. Smith himself testified the pin "was planted on him at the time of his arrest." [19] [13] [1] [11] The last of the prosecution's case seemed to crumble when a soldier in Smith's battalion took the stand and testified, "I was in a bunker smoking dope with Billy Smith when we heard the explosion." [11]

The court-martial jury deliberated for less than six hours and found Smith innocent of all but the most minor charge of resisting arrest (which was later overturned on appeal). "Thirteen members of Smith's family cheered loudly as the verdict was read." [8] After having spent nearly two years in solitary confinement, Smith was immediately released from the Fort Ord stockade on November 14, 1972. [6] :56

Aftermath

Billy Dean Smith After Acquittal Nov 1972 Billy Dean Smith 15Dec1972 CAMP News.jpg
Billy Dean Smith After Acquittal Nov 1972

As mentioned above, even the minor resisting arrest conviction against Smith was overturned on appeal. In 1975, the Army Court of Military Review threw out the conviction arguing that since he knew he was innocent of the charges he had a right to resist arrest. The court ruled that because "the arrest and apprehension" was unlawful, "he was entitled to resist such an arrest with reasonable force." [6] :56 [20]

Smith's exoneration discredited the military at a time when the Vietnam War was becoming more and more unpopular. [21] This was underlined by the fact that the prosecution's own witnesses provided some of the most convincing evidence that Smith was not guilty. One of their witnesses was even revealed to have been undesirably discharged from the military three different times under three different names. Critics called the court-martial a "blatant and groundless persecution of an innocent man." [11]

Flyer for Trial of the Army Sept 5, 1972 to Free Billy Dean Smith Help Free Billy D Smith Come to Monterey.jpg
Flyer for Trial of the Army Sept 5, 1972 to Free Billy Dean Smith

Smith read an official press statement on November 15, 1972, which included:

One of the questions which has been asked of me repeatedly since my acquittal yesterday at Fort Ord concerns how I feel about the system of 'military justice'. Most people want to know whether my acquittal means that I got a fair trial or insist that it is proof positive that the system works. May I say that the system of 'military justice' is still riddled with injustice. If I had been tried in Vietnam, or if I had failed to receive tremendous popular support throughout the world, or if I did not have a brilliant attorney like Luke McKissack, I would have been railroaded. Considering that I was not tried by a jury of my peers, but by seven career combat officers, it is clear that the army had no evidence of my guilt. I was simply singled out as a scapegoat for the 600 fraggings which have occurred in the last four years in Vietnam and which reflect the low state of morale among enlisted men who want to stop the war, stop the defenseless slaughter of Vietnamese. I was chosen for trial because I was an outspoken critic of the war, and was not afraid to expose the racism in Vietnam.... I am glad to be free, but I can't really be free until the war in Southeast Asia is over. [22] [23]

McKissack attributed Smith's exoneration to the weakness of the military's case and to the "strong public support" that Smith received. Demonstrations had been held outside Fort Ord, as well as in other cities in the U.S. and overseas by GIs, veterans and antiwar groups. [24] VVAW declared a victory. They had helped spread the word to "Free Billy Dean Smith" and held a "Trial of the Army" near Fort Ord, which found the army "guilty". [25]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">William Calley</span> American army officer convicted for leading massacre at My Lai, Vietnam (1943–2024)

William Laws Calley Jr. was a United States Army officer convicted by court-martial of the murder of 22 unarmed South Vietnamese civilians in the My Lai massacre on March 16, 1968, during the Vietnam War. Calley was released to house arrest under orders by President Richard Nixon three days after his conviction. The United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia granted him a new trial, but that ruling was overturned by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. His initial life sentence having been modified to a term of 20 years and then further reduced to ten, Calley ultimately served three years of house arrest for the murders. Public opinion at the time about Calley was divided. After his dismissal from the U.S. Army and release from confinement, Calley avoided public attention.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fragging</span> Deliberate killing or attempted killing of a soldier by a fellow soldier

Fragging is the deliberate or attempted killing of a soldier, usually a superior, by a fellow soldier. U.S. military personnel coined the word during the Vietnam War, when such killings were most often committed or attempted with a fragmentation grenade, to make it appear that the killing was accidental or during combat with the enemy. The term fragging now encompasses any deliberate killing of military colleagues.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Deaths of Phillip Esposito and Louis Allen</span> Fragging incident during the Iraq War

The deaths of Phillip Esposito and Louis Allen occurred on June 7, 2005, at Forward Operating Base Danger in Tikrit, Iraq. Captain Phillip Esposito and First Lieutenant Louis Allen, from a New York Army National Guard unit of the United States 42nd Infantry Division, were mortally wounded in Esposito's office by a Claymore mine and died.

United States v. Hasan K. Akbar was the court-martial of a United States Army soldier for a premeditated attack in the early morning hours of March 23, 2003, at Camp Pennsylvania, Kuwait, during the start of the United States invasion of Iraq.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fort Hood Three</span> Three U.S. Army soldiers who refused to deploy to Vietnam in 1966

The Fort Hood Three were three United States Army soldiers – Private First Class James Johnson, Private David A. Samas, and Private Dennis Mora – who refused to be deployed to fight in the Vietnam War on June 30, 1966. This was the first public refusal of orders to Vietnam, and one of the earliest acts of resistance to the war from within the U.S. military. Their refusal was widely publicized and became a cause célèbre within the growing antiwar movement. They filed a federal suit against Secretary of Defense Robert S. McNamara and Secretary of the Army Stanley Resor to prevent their shipment to Southeast Asia and were court-martialed by the Army for insubordination.

The Lawyers Military Defense Committee (LMDC) was a non-profit legal organization founded in 1970 by a group concerned that military members serving in Vietnam were unable to exercise their right to civilian counsel in courts-martial. LMDC existed for six years (1970–76) – two years in the combat zone of Vietnam, and for four years amidst disciplinary clashes inside US military forces in West Germany. During this period high caliber civilian representation and counseling by a cohort of young attorneys were provided free of charge country-wide, in often challenging and controversial cases for hundreds of service members, including scores of trial and post-trial proceedings. Initial logistical obstacles in Vietnam were ultimately resolved satisfactorily, so that communications with clients, other counsel, and the court could be accomplished pursuant to newly issued U.S. Army regulations, as were needs for access to military transport, billeting, and research facilities. In almost every instance representation by LMDC lawyers was welcomed by assigned military counsel. LMDC's operations in a war zone were unique. No undertaking of its kind has appeared in subsequent US conflicts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Concerned Officers Movement</span> Organization of U.S. military officers opposed to the Vietnam War

The Concerned Officers Movement (COM) was an organization of mainly junior officers formed within the U.S. military in the early 1970s. Though its principal purpose was opposition to the U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War, it also fought for First Amendment rights within the military. It was initiated in the Washington, D.C., area by commissioned officers who were also Vietnam Veterans, but rapidly expanded throughout all branches and many bases of the U.S. military, ultimately playing an influential role in the opposition to the Vietnam War. At least two of its chapters expanded their ranks to include enlisted personnel (non-officers), in San Diego changing the group's name to Concerned Military, and in Kodiak, Alaska, to Concerned Servicemen's Movement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">GI's Against Fascism</span> First antiwar and resistance group within the U.S. Navy during the Vietnam War

GI's Against Fascism was a small but formative organization formed within the United States Navy during the years of conscription and the Vietnam War. The group developed in mid-1969 out of a number of sailors requesting adequate quarters, but coalesced into a formal organization with a wider agenda: a more generalized opposition to the war and to perceived institutional racism within the U.S. Navy. Although there had been earlier antiwar and GI resistance groups within the U.S. Army during the Vietnam era, GI's Against Fascism was the first such group in the U.S. Navy. The group published an underground newspaper called Duck Power as a means of spreading its views.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Movement for a Democratic Military</span> Anti-war and GI rights organization during the Vietnam War

The Movement for a Democratic Military (MDM) was an American anti-war, anti-establishment, and military rights organization formed by United States Navy and Marine Corps personnel during the Vietnam War. Formed in California in late 1969 by sailors from Naval Station San Diego in San Diego and Marines from Camp Pendleton Marine Base in Oceanside, it rapidly spread to a number of other cities and bases in California and the Midwest, including the San Francisco Bay Area, Long Beach Naval Station, El Toro Marine Air Station, Fort Ord, Fort Carson, and the Great Lakes Naval Training Center.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">G.I. coffeehouses</span> Antiwar coffeehouses near U.S. military bases during and after the Vietnam War

GI coffeehouses were coffeehouses set up as part of the anti-war movement during the Vietnam War era as a method of fostering antiwar and anti-military sentiment within the U.S. military. They were mainly organized by civilian antiwar activists, though many GIs participated in establishing them as well. They were created in numerous cities and towns near U.S. military bases throughout the U.S as well as Germany and Japan. Due to the normal high turnover rate of GIs at military bases plus the military's response which often involved transfer, discharge and demotion, not to mention the hostility of the pro-military towns where many coffeehouses were located, most of them were short-lived, but a few survived for several years and "contributed to some of the GI movement's most significant actions". The first GI coffeehouse of the Vietnam era was set up in January 1968 and the last closed in 1974.

<i>Waging Peace in Vietnam</i> 2019 book edited by Ron Carver, David Cortright and Barbara Doherty

Waging Peace in Vietnam: U.S. Soldiers and Veterans Who Opposed the War is a non-fiction book edited by Ron Carver, David Cortright, and Barbara Doherty. It was published in September 2019 by New Village Press and is distributed by New York University Press. In March 2023 a Vietnamese language edition of the book was launched at the War Remnants Museum in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">G.I. movement</span> Movement within the United States military during the Vietnam War

The G.I. movement was the resistance to military involvement in the Vietnam War from active duty soldiers in the United States military. Within the military popular forms of resistance included combat refusals, fragging, and desertion. By the end of the war at least 450 officers were killed in fraggings, or about 250 from 1969–1971, over 300 refused to engage in combat and approximately 50,000 American servicemen deserted. Along with resistance inside the U.S. military, civilians opened up various G.I. coffeehouses near military bases where civilians could meet with soldiers and could discuss and cooperate in the anti-war movement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Court-martial of Howard Levy</span> U.S. Army Captain court-martialed for refusing to train soldiers for the Vietnam War

The court-martial of Howard Levy occurred in 1967. Howard Levy was a United States Army doctor who became an early resister to the Vietnam War. In 1967, he was court-martialed at Fort Jackson, South Carolina, for refusing an order to train Green Beret medics on their way to Vietnam. He said it "became clear to me that the Army [was using medics] to 'win hearts and minds' in Vietnamese villages - while still burning them to the ground in search-and-destroy missions." He considered the Special Forces "killers of peasants and murderers of women and children".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Court-martial of Susan Schnall</span> U.S. Navy nurse court-martialed for anti-Vietnam War activity

The court-martial of Susan Schnall, a lieutenant U.S. Navy nurse stationed at the Oakland Naval Hospital in Oakland, California, took place in early 1969 during the Vietnam War. Her political activities, which led to the military trial, may have garnered some of the most provocative news coverage during the early days of the U.S. antiwar movement against that war. In October 1968, the San Francisco Chronicle called her the “Peace Leaflet Bomber” for raining tens of thousands of antiwar leaflets from a small airplane over several San Francisco Bay Area military installations and the deck of an aircraft carrier. The day after this “bombing” run, she marched in her officer’s uniform at the front of a large antiwar demonstration, knowing it was against military regulations. While the Navy was court-martialing her for "conduct unbecoming an officer", she was publicly telling the press, "As far as I'm concerned, it's conduct unbecoming to officers to send men to die in Vietnam."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pacific Counseling Service</span> Antiwar GI counseling service organization during the Vietnam War

The Pacific Counseling Service (PCS) was a G.I. counseling service organization created by antiwar activists during the Vietnam War. PCS saw itself as trying to make the U.S. Armed Forces "adhere more closely to regulations concerning conscientious objector discharges and G.I. rights." The Armed Forces Journal, on the other hand, said PCS was involved in "antimilitary activities", including "legal help and incitement to dissident GIs." PCS evolved out of a small GI Help office started by a freshly discharged Air Force Sergeant in San Francisco, California in January 1969. The idea rapidly caught on among antiwar forces and within a year PCS had offices in Monterey, Oakland, and San Diego in California, plus Tacoma, Washington. By 1971 it had spread around the Pacific with additional offices in Los Angeles, Hong Kong, Okinawa, the Philippines, as well as Tokyo and Iwakuni in Japan. Each location was established near a major U.S. military base. At its peak, PCS was counseling hundreds of disgruntled soldiers a week, helping many with legal advice, conscientious objector discharges and more. As the war wound down, ending in 1975, the offices closed with the last office in San Francisco printing its final underground newspaper in 1976.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fort Lewis Six</span> Six U.S. Army enlisted men courts-martialed for refusing orders to Vietnam in June 1970

The Fort Lewis Six were six U.S. Army enlisted men at the Fort Lewis Army base in the Seattle and Tacoma, Washington area who in June 1970 refused orders to the Vietnam War and were then courts-martialed. They had all applied for conscientious objector status and been turned down by the Pentagon. The Army then ordered them to report for assignment to Vietnam, which they all refused. The Army responded by charging them with "willful disobedience" which carried a maximum penalty of five years at hard labor. The six soldiers were Private First Class Manuel Perez, a Cuban refugee; Private First Class Paul A. Forest, a British citizen from Liverpool; Specialist 4 Carl M. Dix Jr. from Baltimore; Private James B. Allen from Goldsboro, North Carolina; Private First Class Lawrence Galgano from Brooklyn, New York; and Private First Class Jeffrey C. Griffith from Vaughn, Washington. According to the local GI underground newspaper at Fort Lewis, this was the largest mass refusal of direct orders to Vietnam at the base up to that point in the war. Their refusal and subsequent treatment by the Army received national press coverage.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">GI Underground Press</span> Military press produced without official approval or acceptance during the Vietnam War

The GI Underground Press was an underground press movement that emerged among the United States military during the Vietnam War. These were newspapers and newsletters produced without official military approval or acceptance; often furtively distributed under the eyes of "the brass". They were overwhelmingly antiwar and most were anti-military, which tended to infuriate the military command and often resulted in swift retaliation and punishment. Mainly written by rank-and-file active duty or recently discharged GIs, AWOLs and deserters, these publications were intended for their peers and spoke the language and aired the complaints of their audience. They became an integral and powerful element of the larger antiwar, radical and revolutionary movements during those years. This is a history largely ignored and even hidden in the retelling of the U.S. military's role in the Vietnam War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States Servicemen's Fund</span> American anti-war support organization

The United States Servicemen's Fund (USSF) was a support organization for soldier and sailor resistance to the Vietnam War and the U.S. military that was founded in late 1968 and continued through 1973. It was an "umbrella agency" that funded GI underground newspapers and GI Coffeehouses, as well as providing logistical support for the GI antiwar movement ranging from antiwar films and speakers to legal assistance and staff. USSF described itself as supporting a GI defined movement "to work for an end to the Viet Nam war" and "to eradicate the indoctrination and oppression that they see so clearly every day."

<i>Soldiers in Revolt: GI Resistance During the Vietnam War</i> Non-fiction book about soldier & sailor resistance during the Vietnam War

Soldiers in Revolt: GI Resistance During the Vietnam War was the first comprehensive exploration of the disaffection, resistance, rebellion and organized opposition to the Vietnam War within the ranks of the U.S. Armed Forces. It was the first book written by David Cortright, a Vietnam veteran who is currently Professor Emeritus and special adviser for policy studies at the Keough School of Global Affairs and Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies at the University of Notre Dame, and the author, co-author, editor or co-editor of 22 books. Originally published as the war was ending in 1975, it was republished in 2005 with an introduction by the well known progressive historian Howard Zinn. Despite being first published 49 years ago, it remains the definitive history of this often ignored subject. The book argues persuasively, with encyclopedic rigor, the still under appreciated fact that by the early 1970s the U.S. armed forces, particularly its ground forces, were essentially breaking down; experiencing a deep crises of moral, discipline and combat effectiveness. Cortright reveals, for example, that in fiscal year 1972, there were more conscientious objectors than draftees, and precipitous declines in both officer enrollments and non-officer enlistments. He also documents "staggering level[s]" of desertions, increasing nearly 400% in the Army from 1966 to 1971. Perhaps more importantly, Cortright makes a convincing case for this unraveling being both a product and an integral part of the anti-Vietnam War sentiment and movement widespread within U.S. society and worldwide at the time. He documents hundreds of GI antiwar and antimilitary organizations, thousands of individual and group acts of resistance, hundreds of GI underground newspapers, and highlights the role of Black GIs militantly fighting racism and the war. This is where the book stands alone as the first and most systematic study of the antiwar and dissident movements impact and growth within the U.S. armed forces during the Vietnam War. While other books, articles and studies have examined this subject, none have done it as thoroughly and systematically.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">USS Sumter Three</span> Marines charged with "mutiny" on the USS Sumter

In late August and early September 1972, a series of incidents on board the USS Sumter (LST-1181) off the coast of Vietnam resulted in three Black marines being charged with three counts of mutiny and eleven counts of assault, with the possibility of execution. This was "the first time since the US Civil War that American sailors or Marines had been charged with mutiny at sea".

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 Turner, Wallace (1972-09-07). "Draftee on Trial". The New York Times.
  2. 1 2 "Private Charged in Killing of Two Officers in Vietnam". The New York Times. 1972-07-17.
  3. 1 2 3 4 "Billy Dean Smith". wisconsinhistory.org. Billy Dean Smith Defense Committee. 1971. Retrieved 2024-12-05.
  4. Turner, Wallace (1972-09-07). "Draftee on Trial". The New York Times. This is the first trial in this country to grow out of the rash of 'fragging' cases in which soldiers threw fragmentation grenades to kill or maim their superior officers or enemies.
  5. "Frag". www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com. Retrieved June 21, 2021.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Lepre, George (2011). Fragging: Why U.S. Soldiers Assaulted their Officers in Vietnam. Lubbock: Texas Tech University Press.
  7. 1 2 3 4 Allen, Mark (October 1972). "The Case of Billy Dean Smith". The Black Scholar. 4 (2): 15–17. doi:10.1080/00064246.1972.11431269. JSTOR   41163592 . Retrieved 2024-12-05.
  8. 1 2 "GI in Fragging Cleared". The San Francisco Examiner. 1972-11-14.
  9. Senate - Tuesday April 20, 1971. U.S. Government Printing Office. 1971. p. 10871. Retrieved 2025-01-06.
  10. "Favorite Sons". content.wisconsinhistory.org. Wisconsin Historical Society: GI Press Collection. Vietnam Veterans Against the War.
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "Billy Smith Freed". wisconsinhistory.org. U.S. Servicemen's Fund. December 1972. Retrieved 2025-01-07.
  12. Caldwell, Earl (1972-09-07). "Private Denies Role in Slaying 0f 2 Army Officers in Vietnam". The New York Times.
  13. 1 2 "G. I. Found Not Guilty of Killing Officers". The New York Times. 1972-11-15.
  14. "Smith Trial Begins". content.wisconsinhistory.org. Wisconsin Historical Society: GI Press Collection. SOS News.
  15. Caldwell, Earl (1972-10-20). "Defense Begins Its Case in Court-Martial for Grenade Slayings in Vietnam". The New York Times.
  16. "Free Billy Smith: Black G.I. Framed on Frag Rap". content.wisconsinhistory.org. Wisconsin Historical Society: GI Press Collection. The Northern California Billy Dean Smith Defense Committee. I was accused...simply because I was a candid Black, outspoken individual.
  17. "Sir! No Sir! -- ILLUSTRATED SCREENPLAY" (PDF). rapeutation.com. Rapeutation. 2005. Retrieved 2025-01-14.
  18. Caldwell, Earl (1972-10-22). "Grenade Death Court-Martial Unexpectedly Recessed on Coast". The New York Times.
  19. "A U.S. Fragging First". The San Francisco Examiner. 1972-11-12.
  20. "G.I.s Right to Resist". wisconsinhistory.org. Wisconsin Historical Society. Feb 2005. Retrieved 2025-01-14.
  21. Miller, Kevin (Fall 2002). Anything Less Than a Man: Race, manhood, and insurgency in the US Military, 1970-1974. Capstone (History and Social Sciences thesis). California State University Monterey Bay: digitalcommons.csumb.edu. Retrieved 2025-01-09.
  22. "Press Statement by Billy Dean Smith Nov. 15, 1972". content.wisconsinhistory.org. Wisconsin Historical Society: GI Press Collection. Billy Dean Smith.
  23. "Smith, Angela Davis Rap Trial 'Injustice'". The Fresno Bee. 1972-11-16.
  24. "Billy Smith Freed". content.wisconsinhistory.org. Wisconsin Historical Society: GI Press Collection. Camp News Dec 15, 1972 p3.
  25. "People Free Billy Smith". content.wisconsinhistory.org. Wisconsin Historical Society: GI Press Collection. The Veteran.