Court of King's Bench for Saskatchewan

Last updated
Court of King's Bench for Saskatchewan
LocationBattleford; Estevan; Melfort; Moose Jaw; Prince Albert; Regina; Saskatoon; Swift Current; Weyburn; and Yorkton
Authorized byThe Queen's Bench Act, 1998
Number of positions33
Website Court of King's Bench
Chief Justice
Currently Martel D. Popescul [1]
SinceJanuary 1, 2012

The Court of King's Bench for Saskatchewan (Court of Queen's Bench for Saskatchewan during the reign of female monarchs) is the superior trial court for the Canadian province of Saskatchewan.

Contents

Structure and organization

Regina Court House Regina Courthouse.jpg
Regina Court House

The court consists of 29 full-time judges [2] and 10 supernumerary judges, all appointed and paid by the federal government. [3] [4] The court's Chief Justice, currently Martel D. Popescul, is styled the Chief Justice of the King's Bench. Both the Chief Justice and puisne justices are addressed as "My Lord" or "My Lady" and referred to as "His Lordship" or "Her Ladyship". This differs from the terminology used in the Provincial Court of Saskatchewan, whose judges are "Your Honour", "His Honour" or "Her Honour".

The court sits in nine judicial centres [5] [6] [7] and actions are generally brought in the judicial centre closest to where the action arose, or the residence or place of business of the defendant. [8]

Jurisdiction

The court hears civil and criminal law cases. It is a court of inherent jurisdiction and there is no monetary limit on the claims which it may hear. It also has original jurisdiction over matters assigned to it by statute, such as adjudicating human rights complaints.

The court has a Family Law Division, which has exclusive jurisdiction over family law matters in the judicial centres of Saskatoon, Regina, and Prince Albert, and concurrent jurisdiction (with the Provincial Court) over family law matters in all other areas of the province. [9] [10]

As a superior court of original jurisdiction, it has supervisory jurisdiction over administrative tribunals, exercised by the prerogative writs. It also has some appellate jurisdiction, hearing appeals from the Provincial Court of Saskatchewan and some administrative bodies. Appeals may be taken from the King's Bench to the Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan. A further appeal lies to the Supreme Court of Canada.

History

Regina Court House 1900, Victoria Avenue and Hamilton Street. Pictured are Dixie Watson (seated right), Court Clerk; J. M. Duncan; Justice Newlands. RPL-B-510.jpg
Regina Court House 1900, Victoria Avenue and Hamilton Street. Pictured are Dixie Watson (seated right), Court Clerk; J. M. Duncan; Justice Newlands.

Until it became a province in 1905, Saskatchewan was part of the North-West Territories as it existed at that time and its judicial system was that of the territory. In fact, it was not until 1907 – two years after Saskatchewan became a province – that the new province's judicial system was established. [11] The initial court structure of 1907 consisted of three courts: the Supreme Court of Saskatchewan, the District Court (similar to the County Courts of other provinces) and the Surrogate Court. There was no appeal court; rather, appeals were conducted by the full court of the Supreme Court of Saskatchewan, consisting of all the judges of the Supreme Court, other than the judge who made the decision under appeal.

Regina Court House of the King's Bench of Saskatchewan, 2002 Victoria Avenue, c. 1919 Courthouse, 2002 Victoria Avenue.jpg
Regina Court House of the King's Bench of Saskatchewan, 2002 Victoria Avenue, c. 1919

During the First World War, the province reorganized its courts. In 1915, the province passed legislation, The King's Bench Act [12] and The Court of Appeal Act, [13] for the purpose of creating a new court structure. Those acts came into effect on March 1, 1918, resulting in the abolition of the Supreme Court of Saskatchewan and the creation of the trial-level Court of King's Bench and the Court of Appeal. [14] [15]

In 1981, Saskatchewan merged its District Court into the Court of Queen's Bench. [16] As part of that process, the judicial centres of the District Court became the judicial centres of the Court of King's Bench.

Styling

The Court of King's Bench Act foresaw the need to rename the court in the event of a female monarch. The act provides that, during the reign of a king, the court is known as the Court of King’s Bench for Saskatchewan. During the reign of a queen , it is known as the Court of Queen's Bench for Saskatchewan. [14]

Courts of Saskatchewan

There are three main courts in Saskatchewan:

Notable cases

Attorney General of Canada v Merchant Law Group, 2015

In January 2015, the Attorney General of Canada, on behalf of the federal government launched a law suit against Tony Merchant's Regina, Saskatchewan-based law firm—Merchant Law Group (MLG). [17] [18] [19]

July 16, 2015 IRSSA ruling by Justice Neil Gabrielson

Under then Prime Minister Stephen Harper, the Conservative government gave a mandate to officials from the Department of Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development—now known as the Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Development Canada—to "negotiate a settlement with the Catholic entities" who had committed in the Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement (IRSSA) to raise $25 million to pay for healing programs for survivors. [18] As a result, in August 2015, "negotiations began, resulting in a signed agreement on October 30, 2015, and a withdrawal of the Protective Notice of Appeal. [20] Justice Neil Gabrielson had ruled on July 16, 2015 that the federal Conservative government under then Prime Minister Stephen Harper had "inadvertently released 50 Catholic entities from their contractual responsibility to try to raise up to $25-million for aboriginal healing programs". [20] He said that lawyers on both sides—Alexander Gay representing the federal government and Gordon Kuski, representing the "Catholic entities" had a "meeting of the minds" on a "re-lease" of the Catholic entities from "all obligations". Gabrielson ruled that Gay "should be presumed in this dispute to have had the authority to negotiate on behalf of the Canadian government". [20]

A federal government official had confirmed there was "miscommunication with government lawyers that allowed the Catholic Church to escape paying close to $25-million", according to a May 19, 2016 Aboriginal Peoples Television Network (APTN) article "Residential schools settlement agreement under fire". [18]

Under the Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement (IRSSA) fifty Catholic entities were under three obligations which included $29 million to the Aboriginal Healing Foundation, $25 million through "services to aboriginal communities" and finally to use their "best efforts" to "raise $25-million for additional healing programs". By 2015, only $3.7 of the $25 million had been raised. In his July ruling, Gabrielson said that "for a payment of $1.2-million, the Catholic entities were to be released from their responsibilities to raise the remainder of the $25-million, and be seen to have completed the other two categories of contributions." [20] The Catholic entitles had also claimed $29 million for administrative costs. [20]

At the request of The Globe and Mail a University of Alberta law professor, Eric Adams, and Ken Young, a residential school survivor and a Winnipeg lawyer, who read Gabrielson's ruling said that the government under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau should have appealed Gabrielson's ruling, as the stakes were so high. [20] Young said that it did not appear that Gay had agreed on behalf of the federal government to "allow the Catholic entities to walk away from their fundraising obligations." The decision served the federal government’s interests which explains why an appeal of the ruling was never sought. The Catholic entities under the IRSSA were allowed create a corporation that was to be used to make payment. The fifty Catholic entities were allowed to hide behind a secret agreement where the identity of the Catholic entities that made or failed to make a contribution to the corporation was to remain undisclosed. The victims received payment from the corporation without ever knowing the providence of the monies. The in-kind contributions as well as the monetary contributions were never fully paid. The federal government was content to allow Gabrielson's ruling to stand and bring an end to what was a bad deal for the victims.

In April 2016, then Indigenous Affairs Minister Carolyn Bennett said that while the Liberal government under Prime Minister Trudeau would put pressure on the Catholic church to resume fundraising efforts towards to remainder of the $25 million, the federal government would not "make up the shortfall." [20]

R v Stanley (2018)

In R v Stanley, presided by Saskatchewan Chief Justice Popescul, an all-white jury [21] acquitted local Battleford, Saskatchewan farmer Gerald Stanley on February 9, 2018. The jury found that the death of Colten Boushie, from the Cree Red Pheasant First Nation [22] occurred because of "hang fire". [23] [24] Clint Wuttunee, Chief of the Red Pheasant First Nation, called the verdict "absolutely perverse". [21] [25] [23] Following the announcement of the acquittal, rallies and vigils took place across Canada. [26] The rally at the Saskatoon court attracted 1,000 people who supported Boushie's family and were frustrated by the jury's decision. [26] At a press conference on February 11, hosted by Saskatoon Tribal Council, Mayor Clark described the event as a "defining moment for this community and this country". [26]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Law of Canada</span>

The legal system of Canada is pluralist: its foundations lie in the English common law system, the French civil law system, and Indigenous law systems developed by the various Indigenous Nations.

In common law systems, a superior court is a court of general jurisdiction over civil and criminal legal cases. A superior court is "superior" in relation to a court with limited jurisdiction, which is restricted to civil cases involving monetary amounts with a specific limit, or criminal cases involving offenses of a less serious nature. A superior court may hear appeals from lower courts. For courts of general jurisdiction in civil law system, see ordinary court.

The Court of Appeal for Ontario is the appellate court for the province of Ontario, Canada. The seat of the court is Osgoode Hall in downtown Toronto, also the seat of the Law Society of Ontario and the Divisional Court of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Same-sex marriage in Saskatchewan</span>

Same-sex marriage became legal in Saskatchewan on November 5, 2004 as a result of a decision of the Family Law Division of the Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench. This decision followed similar cases in six other provinces and territories, and pre-dated by eight months the federal Civil Marriage Act of 2005, which made same-sex marriage available throughout Canada. Later court decisions have dealt with the issue of marriage commissioners who object to performing same-sex marriages on the basis of their religious beliefs.

The court system of Canada forms the country's judiciary, formally known as "The King on the Bench", which interprets the law and is made up of many courts differing in levels of legal superiority and separated by jurisdiction. Some of the courts are federal in nature, while others are provincial or territorial.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federal Court of Appeal</span> Canadian federal appeal court

The Federal Court of Appeal is a Canadian appellate court that hears cases concerning federal matters.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federal Court (Canada)</span> Canadian federal trial court

The Federal Court is a Canadian trial court that hears cases arising under certain areas of federal law. The Federal Court is a superior court with nationwide jurisdiction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of New South Wales</span> Superior court of New South Wales, Australia

The Supreme Court of New South Wales is the highest state court of the Australian State of New South Wales. It has unlimited jurisdiction within the state in civil matters, and hears the most serious criminal matters. Whilst the Supreme Court is the highest New South Wales court in the Australian court hierarchy, an appeal by special leave can be made to the High Court of Australia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Court of King's Bench of Alberta</span> Superior court of Alberta, Canada

The Court of King's Bench of Alberta is the superior trial court of the Canadian province of Alberta. During the reign of Elizabeth II, it was named Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan</span>

The Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan (SKCA) is a Canadian appellate court.

The Manitoba Court of Appeal is the court of appeal in, and the highest court of, the Canadian province of Manitoba. It hears criminal, civil, and family law cases, as well as appeals from various administrative boards and tribunals.

The Provincial Court of Saskatchewan is the provincial court of record for the province of Saskatchewan. It hears matters relating to criminal law, youth law, civil law, family law, traffic law and municipal bylaws.

The Court of King's Bench of Manitoba —or the Court of Queen’s Bench of Manitoba, depending on the monarch—is the superior court of the Canadian province of Manitoba.

The Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories is the name of two different superior courts for the Canadian territory of the Northwest Territories, which have existed at different times.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Red Pheasant Cree Nation</span> Plains Cree in Saskatchewan Canada

The Red Pheasant Cree Nation is a Plains Cree First Nations band government in the Canadian province of Saskatchewan. The band's sole reserve, Red Pheasant 108, is 33 km (21 mi) south of North Battleford.

The Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement is an agreement between the government of Canada and approximately 86,000 Indigenous peoples in Canada who at some point were enrolled as children in the Canadian Indian residential school system, a system which was in place between 1879 and 1997. The IRSSA recognized the damage inflicted by the residential schools and established a C$1.9-billion compensation package called CEP for all former IRS students. The agreement, announced in 2006, was the largest class action settlement in Canadian history.

Martel D. Popescul is the Chief Justice of the Court of King’s Bench for Saskatchewan. He was appointed Chief Justice effective January 1, 2012, after serving on the Court since 2006.

Colten Boushie was a 22-year-old Indigenous man of the Cree Red Pheasant First Nation who was fatally shot on a rural Saskatchewan farm by its owner, Gerald Stanley. Stanley stood trial for second-degree murder and for a lesser charge of manslaughter, but was ultimately acquitted in February 2018.

<i>An Act to amend the Criminal Code, the Youth Criminal Justice Act and other Acts and to make consequential amendments to other Acts</i> 2019 act of the Canadian Parliament

An Act to amend the Criminal Code, the Youth Criminal Justice Act and other Acts and to make consequential amendments to other Acts is a statute passed by the Parliament of Canada. It formerly was known as Bill C-75. Some provisions of the Act came into force on 19 September 2019.

<i>Fontaine et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., 2015 SKQB 220</i>

Fontaine et al. v. Canada et al., 2015 SKQB 220, 389 DLR (4th) 749, is a decision of the Court of Queen's Bench for Saskatchewan which found that the Government of Canada, the Catholic entities party to the Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement (IRSSA), and the Corporation of Catholic Entities Party to the IRSSA (CCEPIRSS) had reached "an enforceable settlement of all issues between these parties relating to CCEPIRSS' obligations under the Settlement Agreement." The case became controversial because The Globe and Mail, and subsequently CBC News, claimed that the decision had enabled the Catholic entities to escape one or more of their IRSSA obligations that allegedly had not been met. Canadian Catholic authorities have maintained that all the obligations were met.

References

  1. ↑ "Saskatchewan Law Courts - Judges". sasklawcourts.ca. Archived from the original on 2018-08-21. Retrieved 2018-08-20.
  2. ↑ "Number of federally appointed judges as of July 1, 2018", Office of the Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs Canada, retrieved September 27, 2020
  3. ↑ "Courts of Saskatchewan website: Court of Queen's Bench Judges". Archived from the original on 2013-03-10. Retrieved 2013-03-12.
  4. ↑ Peter Hogg, Constitutional Law of Canada, 2nd ed. (Toronto: Carswell, 1985), pp.136–137.
  5. ↑ "Courts of Saskatchewan website: Court of Queen's Bench Locations". Archived from the original on 2013-03-10. Retrieved 2013-03-12.
  6. ↑ The Queen's Bench Act, 1998 , S.S. 1998, c. Q-1.01, s. 21.
  7. ↑ The Queen's Bench Regulations , R.R.S. c. Q-1.01 Reg 1, s. 3.
  8. ↑ The Queen's Bench Act, 1998 , S.S. 1998, c. Q-1.01, s. 22(1).
  9. ↑ "Courts of Saskatchewan website: Court of Queen's Bench Family Law". Archived from the original on 2013-03-10. Retrieved 2013-03-12.
  10. ↑ The Queen's Bench Regulations , R.R.S. c. Q-1.01 Reg. 1, s. 8.
  11. ↑ Saskatchewan Act , S.C. 1905, c. 42, s. 16.
  12. ↑ The King's Bench Act, S.S. 1915, c. 10.
  13. ↑ The Court of Appeal Act, S.S. 1915, c. 9.
  14. 1 2 Courts of Saskatchewan website Queen's Bench History. Archived 2013-03-10 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 12 March 2012.
  15. ↑ Courts of Saskatchewan website Court of Appeal History. Archived 2013-03-10 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 12 March 2012.
  16. ↑ Saskatchewan Archives Board, Court Records
  17. ↑ Pacholik, Barb (January 25, 2016). "Regina lawyer Tony Merchant calls multi-million-dollar win 'wonderful'". Regina Leader Post. Retrieved September 26, 2020.
  18. 1 2 3 Barnsley, Paul; Martens, Kathleen (May 19, 2016). "Residential schools settlement agreement under fire". APTN News. Sioux Lookout, Ontario. Retrieved September 26, 2020.
  19. ↑ Attorney General of Canada v Merchant Law Group, 2016 SKQB 25
  20. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Fine, Sean; Galloway, Gloria (April 20, 2016). "Federal government killed appeal of residential-school settlement ruling". The Globe and Mail. Toronto And Ottawa. Retrieved September 27, 2020.
  21. 1 2 Graveland, Bill (February 10, 2018). "Not guilty verdict in shooting death of Colten Boushie 'absolutely perverse'". The Toronto Star. Retrieved February 11, 2018.
  22. ↑ "Gerald Stanley acquitted of all charges in the death of Colten Boushie". APTN National News . February 10, 2018. Retrieved February 11, 2018.
  23. 1 2 Plaxton, Michael (February 11, 2018). "The Stanley verdict: Manslaughter and 'hang fire'". The Globe and Mail. Battleford, Saskatchewan. Retrieved February 11, 2018.
  24. ↑ Friesen, Joe (February 8, 2018). "Gerald Stanley must be held accountable for death of Colten Boushie, Crown argues". The Globe and Mail. Battleford, Saskatchewan. Archived from the original on May 21, 2022. Retrieved February 11, 2018.
  25. ↑ Graveland, Bill (February 8, 2018). "Defence claims no evidence Gerald Stanley intentionally killed Colten Boushie". The Toronto Star. Retrieved February 11, 2018.
  26. 1 2 3 Frieson, Joe (February 10, 2018). "Thousands rally across Canada after Gerald Stanley acquitted in killing of Colten Boushie". The Globe and Mail. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. Retrieved February 11, 2018.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.