Croydon typhoid outbreak of 1937

Last updated
Croydon typhoid outbreak of 1937
Addington Well Pumping Station - geograph.org.uk - 452341.jpg
Addington Well Pumping Station
DateOctober 1937 (October 1937)–December 1937 (December 1937)
Location Croydon
Cause Typhoid fever
Outcome341 cases
Deaths43
Litigation Read v. Croydon Corporation (1938)

The Croydon typhoid outbreak of 1937, also known as the Croydon epidemic of typhoid fever, [1] was an outbreak of typhoid fever in Croydon, Surrey, now part of London, in 1937. It resulted in 341 cases of typhoid (43 fatal), and it caused considerable local discontent leading to a media campaign and a public inquiry.

Contents

The source of the illness remained a mystery until the cases were mapped out using epidemiological method. The origin was found to be the polluted chalk water well at Addington, London, which supplied water to up to one-fifth of the area that is now the London Borough of Croydon. Coupled with issues around the co-operation between the medical officers and the administrators of the Borough, three coincidental events were blamed; changes to the well structure by repair work, the employment of a new workman who was an unwitting carrier of typhoid, and failure to chlorinate the water.

Background

The Public Health Act 1848 gave local boards of health powers to improve the sanitary condition of towns and populous places in England and Wales by supervising the cleaning of streets, collection of refuse, disposal of sewage and supplying clean water. Subsequently, an integrated water supply and sewage disposal system was installed at Croydon, twelve miles south of London, one of the first towns to have one, when its population was around 20,000. Although the system was supposedly a sanitary pioneer, the death rate in the town rose after installation and typhoid outbreaks occurred in 1853 and 1875, possibly as a result of the new system permitting the disease to spread more efficiently. [2] [3] [4]

Addington well

By 1937, when Croydon's population was around 250,000, [5] [6] [1] around 40,000 people, or between one-sixth and one-fifth of Croydon received its water supply from the Addington well sunk into chalk ground in 1885 at Addington. [5] [7] The Addington well, 250 feet (76 m) deep and 10 feet (3.0 m) wide, [1] was one of five wells that supplied Croydon, [5] and it collected water from the surrounding ground, some of which housed cesspools and a pig farm. [8]

Along with the Stroud Green well, the Addington well fed the Addington Well Pumping Station. The water was then filtered, chlorinated and filtered again before being pumped into the Addington reservoir and fed through what was termed a "high level system". [8] [9] As the water was already at high risk from contamination, the Croydon Corporation installed a number of methods to filter and clean the water, in 1908, 1928, and 1936. These included an ozone plant, rapid pressure filters, a chlorinating plant and an ammoniating plant. [8]

However, the filters and chlorinator worked together and it was not possible to operate them separately. This point would later cause problems when the filters required repairs. [7] Worrying levels of the bacteria E. coli in the Addington well water resulted in regular chlorination from 20 July 1936, but without any continuous record of its use. Both the reservoir and well waters were supposedly tested monthly, until the end of April 1937, when for no explainable reason except by "mere oversight", it stopped. [1] [8]

Sequence of events

September - October 1937

From mid-September to 15 October 1937, unfiltered and unchlorinated water was pumped to waste, while repair work went on at the Addington well. [1] From 16 October 1937, unknown to either the Borough engineer, Charles Boast, or Croydon's medical officer of health, Oscar Holden, this raw untreated water began to be pumped into the public supply. [1] [7] [8] [10] A man later found to be a carrier of typhoid, was employed at the well from 28 September to 26 October 1937. [1]

The origin of the illness was initially thought to be infected shellfish from the European mainland, as the earliest case in 1937 presented mid-October with a history of travel to France. [5] [11] Later, when the number of cases increased and an inquiry was held, the Ministry of Health appointed lawyer Harold Murphy, KC, recorded that the first case of the Croydon typhoid outbreak was not the one with a travel history to France, but one notified on 27 October 1937. He recorded that a second was notified on 28 October and two further cases on 30 October. [5] Historian Anne Hardy later refers to the first case as the shellfish-related incident on 16 October and gives subsequent dates as the second case on 25 October and another four on the 29th. [11]

One of the cases diagnosed at the end of October 1937 was that of Richard Rimington, who later died. [12] His father Charles Rimington, who worked for the Bank of England, conducted his own investigations, and by visiting and questioning those that he personally knew and that were affected, he deduced that the source of the outbreak must be the water supply. He subsequently informed Boast, and presented his findings to Holden. [10] Rimington wrote:

My son has just been taken to the Isolation Hospital suffering from typhoid. The maid from No. 66 in the same road has recently developed typhoid and a little girl from No. 64 is suspected of having the same disease. The milk supply in all these cases is not the same, shell fish and watercress have not been partaken of, the only common thing appears to be water. Some operations in connection with the water supply have recently been carried out in this road. [6]

On 31 October 1937, 40 local residents, including Rimington, met up and invited Boast and Holden. Holden was however, distracted by the recent Bournemouth typhoid outbreak and its origins in milk. [10] One resident, Ronald Moss, having been aware of the relationship between the spread of typhoid via water from his experiences in India, was "amazed" that Holden felt it "inconceivable" that Croydon's troubles with typhoid stemmed from its water supply. [6] According to Holden, the water was tested regularly. [6] Unlike previous epidemics, the typhoid outbreak was recognised not by officials, but by a local resident. [6] [10]

November 1937

Dissatisfied with Holden's explanations, the residents formed the South Croydon Typhoid Outbreak Committee (SCTOC), chaired by Charles Rimington. Over the subsequent month, they met daily. [10] The Ministry of Health was notified by Holden on 1 November 1937. Chlorination resumed that same day and Holden wrote to all the registered medical practitioners in the Borough. However, in the interim, another six people were confirmed. The source of the illness remained a mystery until 3 November 1937, the day after Holden requested the aid of Ernest T. Conybeare, the Ministry of Health's expert on typhoid, who mapped out the cases and matched them with the water supply using traditional epidemiological methods. The origin was found to be the polluted well at Addington. [3] [6] [11] [12]

The outbreak caused considerable local discontent and representatives of the SCTOC acted to lead a media campaign and initiate a public inquiry. [3] [12] [13] On 17 November 1937, the SCTOC wrote to the Ministry of Health, demanding such an inquiry. [10]

December 1937

By the time the inquiry began on 6 December 1937, there were 80 cases in hospital. [6] Professor Louis Napoleon George Filon died from typhoid in Croydon at the end of December 1937. [14] By the end of the year, the outbreak would lead to 43 deaths and a total of 341 cases. [7] [15] As a result, Holden later received much criticism for not confirming the origin of the typhoid more speedily. [13]

Inquiry

On 22 November 1937, Harold Gourley, an eminent civil engineer, and Sir Humphry Rolleston, who was previously physician-in-ordinary to King George V, became expert assessors, with Harold Murphy leading the inquiry. [5] [6] [16] The inquiry began on 6 December 1937 during the outbreak, with the Croydon Corporation represented by Sir Walter Monckton. Its transcript filled more than 1,000 pages. [5] [6] Murphy later replied to the Minister of Health;

The immediate cause of the outbreak was a portion of the public water supply becoming infected by the typhoid bacillus. The infected portion was that derived from a chalk well at Addington. How that well became infected is a question that cannot be answered with absolute certainty, but all the circumstances and probabilities point so strongly in one direction that I feel justified in coming to a definite conclusion on the subject. That conclusion is that the well was infected by the fact that at the end of September and during October, 1937, men, one of whom was an active carrier of typhoid, were working in the well and that during large parts of such period water from the well, unfiltered and unchlorinated, was being pumped to supply. [6]

The inquiry lasted 16 days, [10] and its report was published as a white paper on 14 February 1938. [5] Murphy reported that the origin of the typhoid came from a workman, known as "Case A", who had become unwell with typhoid fever during the First World War, but hadn't realised he was a carrier. [5] [13] He was employed in building works on the Addington well between 28 September and 26 October 1937. [5] [1]

Holden was however, unaware of the cessation of chlorination while works were being carried out, [6] and he was accused of not notifying local doctors earlier. The journal Medical Officer was both critical of Holden and of higher medical authorities. [13] Murphy pointed out that a number of practitioners would not be familiar with cases of typhoid, and may not have realised that the water was a risk. In addition, some practitioners from surrounding boroughs may not have been aware of the outbreak. [5] [6] A combination of factors were concluded to have caused the incident, including the repair works on the well, the worker who was a carrier of typhoid and the water supply not being chlorinated. Management was criticised for not effectively managing the water supply and for not adequately communicating with each other. It was noted that the medical officer of health (Holden) and Borough engineer (Boast) had little or no contact with each other. [1] Holden was also noted to have been "ignorant of the fact that water was the most common cause of transmission". [10]

Aftermath and responses

Subsequently, legal claims began to be issued to the corporation from spring 1938. [10] Around 230 claims were made against Croydon Corporation. Hence, it was decided that one case should be used as a test case, [17] [10] one where the father of one of the survivors was successful in arguing that the water undertaker was liable. [18] In December 1938, this test case, Read v. Croydon Corporation , took place in the High Court. It concluded with compensation for medical expenses and "pain and suffering and general inconvenience caused by [the plaintiff's] illness". [10]

The cases attracted national media attention, as was reflected in the number of scrapbooks of newspaper articles contained in 17 volumes collected by Walter Monckton and the Croydon Corporation. According to the Daily Sketch , Croydon in 1937 was "a dangerous and frightening place". [10] By the late 1930s, with 75% of the British population now possessing a wireless, the BBC was used to publicise news on the outbreak. [10] One reaction was that workers from Croydon were stigmatised by their London colleagues. [19] A detailed review of the outbreak also appeared in The American Journal of Public Health . [1] [20]

Between 1937 and 1986, the UK witnessed over 11,794 cases of water‐borne disease over 34 outbreaks. At least six deaths were reported during this time. [21] In The Classical Quarterly in 1979, the typhoid outbreak of 1937 was described as the "most recent serious event of this kind to take place in this country", [22] typical of "when a large population draws its water supply from a central source". [22] In his book When Food Kills (2003), bacteriologist Hugh Pennington quotes the Croydon Public inquiry's conclusion that "there was both misunderstanding and lack of communication between the responsible officers" at Croydon, and in his opinion "this is a recurrent theme in the incubation periods of disasters". [7]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cholera</span> Bacterial infection of the small intestine

Cholera is an infection of the small intestine by some strains of the bacterium Vibrio cholerae. Symptoms may range from none, to mild, to severe. The classic symptom is large amounts of watery diarrhea that lasts a few days. Vomiting and muscle cramps may also occur. Diarrhea can be so severe that it leads within hours to severe dehydration and electrolyte imbalance. This may result in sunken eyes, cold skin, decreased skin elasticity, and wrinkling of the hands and feet. Dehydration can cause the skin to turn bluish. Symptoms start two hours to five days after exposure.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Typhoid fever</span> Disease caused by the bacteria Salmonella Typhi

Typhoid fever, also known as typhoid, is a disease caused by Salmonella serotype Typhi bacteria. Symptoms vary from mild to severe, and usually begin six to 30 days after exposure. Often there is a gradual onset of a high fever over several days. This is commonly accompanied by weakness, abdominal pain, constipation, headaches, and mild vomiting. Some people develop a skin rash with rose colored spots. In severe cases, people may experience confusion. Without treatment, symptoms may last weeks or months. Diarrhea may be severe, but is uncommon. Other people may carry it without being affected, but are still contagious. Typhoid fever is a type of enteric fever, along with paratyphoid fever. S. enterica Typhi is believed to infect and replicate only within humans.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mary Mallon</span> Irish cook who was a carrier of typhoid fever in New York

Mary Mallon, known commonly as Typhoid Mary, was an Irish-born American cook believed to have infected between 51 and 122 people with typhoid fever. The infections caused three confirmed deaths, with unconfirmed estimates of as many as 50. She was the first person in the United States identified as an asymptomatic carrier of the pathogenic bacteria Salmonella typhi. She was forcibly quarantined twice by authorities, the second time for the remainder of her life because she persisted in working as a cook and thereby exposed others to the disease. Mallon died after a total of nearly 30 years quarantined. Her popular nickname has since become a term for persons who spread disease or other misfortune, not always aware that they are doing so.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Water purification</span> Process of removing impurities from water

Water purification is the process of removing undesirable chemicals, biological contaminants, suspended solids, and gases from water. The goal is to produce water that is fit for specific purposes. Most water is purified and disinfected for human consumption, but water purification may also be carried out for a variety of other purposes, including medical, pharmacological, chemical, and industrial applications. The history of water purification includes a wide variety of methods. The methods used include physical processes such as filtration, sedimentation, and distillation; biological processes such as slow sand filters or biologically active carbon; chemical processes such as flocculation and chlorination; and the use of electromagnetic radiation such as ultraviolet light.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cryptosporidiosis</span> Parasitic disease

Cryptosporidiosis, sometimes informally called crypto, is a parasitic disease caused by Cryptosporidium, a genus of protozoan parasites in the phylum Apicomplexa. It affects the distal small intestine and can affect the respiratory tract in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised individuals, resulting in watery diarrhea with or without an unexplained cough. In immunosuppressed individuals, the symptoms are particularly severe and can be fatal. It is primarily spread through the fecal-oral route, often through contaminated water; recent evidence suggests that it can also be transmitted via fomites contaminated with respiratory secretions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Water supply</span> Provision of water by public utilities, commercial organisations or others

Water supply is the provision of water by public utilities, commercial organisations, community endeavors or by individuals, usually via a system of pumps and pipes. Public water supply systems are crucial to properly functioning societies. These systems are what supply drinking water to populations around the globe. Aspects of service quality include continuity of supply, water quality and water pressure. The institutional responsibility for water supply is arranged differently in different countries and regions. It usually includes issues surrounding policy and regulation, service provision and standardization.

The Walkerton E. coli outbreak was the result of a contamination of the drinking water supply of Walkerton, Ontario, Canada, with E. coli and Campylobacter jejuni bacteria. The water supply was contaminated as a result of improper water treatment following heavy rainfall in late April and early May 2000, that had drawn bacteria from the manure of nearby cattle used to fertilize crops into the shallow aquifer of a nearby well. The first reported case was on May 17. The contamination caused gastroenteritis and sickened more than 2,000 people and resulted in seven deaths.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Waterborne diseases</span> Diseases caused by pathogenic microorganisms transmitted by waters

Waterborne diseases are conditions caused by pathogenic micro-organisms that are transmitted by water. These diseases can be spread while bathing, washing, drinking water, or by eating food exposed to contaminated water. They are a pressing issue in rural areas amongst developing countries all over the world. While diarrhea and vomiting are the most commonly reported symptoms of waterborne illness, other symptoms can include skin, ear, respiratory, or eye problems. Lack of clean water supply, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) are major causes for the spread of waterborne diseases in a community. Therefore, reliable access to clean drinking water and sanitation is the main method to prevent waterborne diseases.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1854 Broad Street cholera outbreak</span> Severe outbreak of cholera that occurred in London in 1854

The Broad Street cholera outbreak was a severe outbreak of cholera that occurred in 1854 near Broad Street in Soho, London, England, and occurred during the 1846–1860 cholera pandemic happening worldwide. This outbreak, which killed 616 people, is best known for the physician John Snow's study of its causes and his hypothesis that germ-contaminated water was the source of cholera, rather than particles in the air. This discovery came to influence public health and the construction of improved sanitation facilities beginning in the mid-19th century. Later, the term "focus of infection" started to be used to describe sites, such as the Broad Street pump, in which conditions are favourable for transmission of an infection. Snow's endeavour to find the cause of the transmission of cholera caused him to unknowingly create a double-blind experiment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">William Henry Corfield (hygienist)</span>

William Henry Corfield was an English public health physician. Appointed Professor of Hygiene and Public Health at University College London in 1869, Corfield had a major influence on public health and household sanitation in Victorian England before there was extensive knowledge of bacteriology and a clear understanding of infectious disease transmission. He was also an early advocate of land filtration and sewage farms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Typhus</span> Group of infectious diseases

Typhus, also known as typhus fever, is a group of infectious diseases that include epidemic typhus, scrub typhus, and murine typhus. Common symptoms include fever, headache, and a rash. Typically these begin one to two weeks after exposure.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of water supply and sanitation</span>

The history of water supply and sanitation is one of a logistical challenge to provide clean water and sanitation systems since the dawn of civilization. Where water resources, infrastructure or sanitation systems were insufficient, diseases spread and people fell sick or died prematurely.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John L. Leal</span> American public health physician (1858–1914)

John Laing Leal was an American physician and water treatment expert who, in 1908, was responsible for conceiving and implementing the first disinfection of a U.S. drinking water supply using chlorine. He was one of the principal expert witnesses at two trials which examined the quality of the water supply in Jersey City, New Jersey, and which evaluated the safety and utility of chlorine for production of "pure and wholesome" drinking water. The second trial verdict approved the use of chlorine to disinfect drinking water which led to an explosion of its use in water supplies across the U.S.

In 1964, there was an outbreak of typhoid in the city of Aberdeen, Scotland. The first two cases were identified on 20 May 1964; eventually over 400 cases were diagnosed and the patients were quarantined at the City Hospital in Urquhart Road, Woodend Hospital in Eday Road, and Tor-na-Dee Hospital in Milltimber which was used as an overflow hospital for typhoid cases. There were three deaths connected with the outbreak. Dr Ian MacQueen, the Medical Officer of Health for Aberdeen, became well known in the media for his twice-daily briefings.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Water chlorination</span> Chorination of water

Water chlorination is the process of adding chlorine or chlorine compounds such as sodium hypochlorite to water. This method is used to kill bacteria, viruses and other microbes in water. In particular, chlorination is used to prevent the spread of waterborne diseases such as cholera, dysentery, and typhoid.

The development of water treatment and filtration technologies went through many stages. The greatest level of change came in the 19th century as the growth of cities forced the development of new methods for distributing and treating water and the problems of water contamination became more pronounced.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of typhoid fever</span>

In 2000, typhoid fever caused an estimated 21.7 million illnesses and 217,000 deaths. It occurs most often in children and young adults between 5 and 19 years old. In 2013, it resulted in about 161,000 deaths – down from 181,000 in 1990. Infants, children, and adolescents in south-central and Southeast Asia experience the greatest burden of illness. Outbreaks of typhoid fever are also frequently reported from sub-Saharan Africa and countries in Southeast Asia. In the United States, about 400 cases occur each year, and 75% of these are acquired while traveling internationally.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lincoln Corporation Waterworks</span>

Lincoln Corporation Waterworks and its predecessors and successors have provided a public water supply and sewerage and sewage treatment services to the city of Lincoln, England. The Romans are known to have built a conduit from the Roaring Meg stream to a water tower in East Bight. Further development took place in 1846, when the Lincoln Water Company was established, following a national outbreak of cholera in 1831-32. The main source of supply was formed by impounding Prial Drain to form Hartsholme Lake. The water was filtered by sand filters at Boultham, and was pumped to a service reservoir at Westgate. Lincoln Corporation wanted to gain control of their water supply, and bought out the water company in 1871. The enabling Act of Parliament also allowed them to construct a sewerage network, which fed a sewage farm at Canwick, but the Bracebridge area was not connected to the sewers, and waste water polluted local watercourses. There were sporadic outbreaks of typhoid and cholera, although the Corporation argued that these might not be linked to a polluted water supply.

The Bournemouth typhoid outbreak was an outbreak of typhoid in 1936 in the south coast of England, a traditional holiday location. It occurred during the months of August and September. The first cases were traced to raw milk from a dairy supplied by a farm whose cows drank water from a river contaminated by sewage from a cottage where a typhoid carrier lived. 718 people became infected, including 200 visitors and 518 residents.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Maidstone typhoid epidemic</span>

The Maidstone Typhoid epidemic, was the largest typhoid epidemic the UK had experienced.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Ravenel, Mazÿk P. (May 1938). "The Croydon Epidemic of Typhoid Fever". American Journal of Public Health and the Nation's Health . 28 (5): 644–646. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.28.5.644 . PMC   1529192 . PMID   18014847.
  2. Goddard, Nicholas (2005). Chapter 8. Sanitate Crescamus: Water Supply, Sewage Disposal and Environmental Values in a Victorian Suburb. In Bill Luckin, Geneviève Massard-Guilbaud and Dieter Schott (Eds) Resources of the City: Contributions to an Environmental History of Modern Europe. London: Routledge (2005). doi : 10.4324/9781315244358, ISBN   978-1-315-24435-8 (subscription required)
  3. 1 2 3 Goddard, Nick (29 November 2005). "Croydon Typhoid Outbreak of 1937". www.bbc.co.uk. Retrieved 28 January 2020.
  4. Cambridge, Nicholas (2 March 2017). Sewage Treatment.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Murphy, H. L. (19 February 1938). "Croydon Typhoid Inquiry: Mr. Murphy's Report". British Medical Journal. 1 (4024): 404–407. ISSN   0007-1447. PMC   2085766 . PMID   20781269.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Wall; Rosemary (2015). Bacteria in Britain, 1880–1939. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. p. 149. ISBN   978-1-84893-427-6.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 Pennington, T. Hugh (2003). When Food Kills: BSE, E.coli and disaster science: BSE, E.coli and disaster science. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 29–31. ISBN   0-19-8525176.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 "Medico-Legal". British Medical Journal. 2 (4067): 1286–1289. 17 December 1938. doi:10.1136/bmj.2.4067.1286. ISSN   0007-1447. PMC   2211231 .(subscription required)
  9. Clark, R. Veitch (1919). "Croydon 1919: Report of the MoH". wellcomelibrary.org. p. 11. Retrieved 9 February 2020.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Wall, Rosemary (17 December 2014). "Complaining about typhoid in 1930s Britain". In Reinarz, J.; Wynter, R. (eds.). Complaints, Controversies and Grievances in Medicine: Historical and Social Science Perspectives. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. p. 178. doi:10.4324/9781315758923-21. ISBN   978-1-138-79490-0 . Retrieved 6 February 2020.
  11. 1 2 3 Hardy, Anne (2015). Salmonella Infections, Networks of Knowledge, and Public Health in Britain, 1880-1975. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. p. 37. ISBN   978-0-19-870497-3.
  12. 1 2 3 "Croydon Typhoid Inquiry: Closing Proceedings". The British Medical Journal. 1 (4019): 135–137. 1938. doi:10.1136/bmj.1.4019.135. ISSN   0007-1447. JSTOR   25368560. PMC   2085503 . PMID   20781171.
  13. 1 2 3 4 David F. Smith; H. Lesley Diack; T. Hugh Pennington; Thomas Hugh Pennington; Elizabeth M. Russell (2005). Food Poisoning, Policy, and Politics: Corned Beef and Typhoid in Britain in the 1960s. The Boydell Press. p. 13. ISBN   1-84383-138-4.
  14. Jeffery, G. B. (1939-01-31). "Louis Napoleon George Filon, 1875-1937". Obituary Notices of Fellows of the Royal Society. 2 (7): 501–509. doi:10.1098/rsbm.1939.0010. ISSN   1479-571X.
  15. Holden, O. M. (October 1938). "The croydon typhoid outbreak (A Summary of the Chief Clinical Features)". Public Health. 52: 135–146. doi:10.1016/S0033-3506(38)80123-2. ISSN   0033-3506.
  16. "Croydon Typhoid Inquiry: History Of The Outbreak". The British Medical Journal. 2 (4016): 1293–1295. 25 December 1937. ISSN   0007-1447. JSTOR   25368331.
  17. "The Croydon Typhoid Case". Medicao-Legal and Criminological Review. 7 (1): 51–56. 1939-01-01. doi:10.1177/030216373900700107. ISSN   0302-1637. S2CID   208341635.
  18. Miller, Chris (1998). Environmental Rights: Critical Perspectives. London and new York: Routledge. p. 112. ISBN   0-415-17064-8.
  19. "Lost_Hospitals_of_London". ezitis.myzen.co.uk. Retrieved 7 February 2020.
  20. "Council flogs off Addington Hills cooling station on the cheap". Inside Croydon. 23 February 2018. Retrieved 8 February 2020.
  21. Galbraith, N. S.; Barrett, Nicola J.; Stanwell‐Smith, Rosalind (1987). "Water and Disease After Croydon: A Review of Water-borne and Water-associated Disease in the UK 1937–86". Water and Environment Journal. 1 (1): 7–21. doi:10.1111/j.1747-6593.1987.tb01184.x. ISSN   1747-6593.
  22. 1 2 Holladay, A. J.; Poole, J. C. F. (1979). "Thucydides and the Plague of Athens". The Classical Quarterly. 29 (2): 292. doi:10.1017/S0009838800035928. ISSN   0009-8388. JSTOR   638096. PMID   11619645. S2CID   5447979.

Further reading