Cytoplasmic incompatibility

Last updated

Cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI) is a mating incompatibility reported in many arthropod species that is caused by intracellular parasites such as Wolbachia . These bacteria reside in the cytoplasm of the host cells (hence the name cytoplasmic incompatibility) and modify their hosts' sperm in a way that leads to embryo death unless this modification is 'rescued' by the same bacteria in the eggs. CI has been reported in many insect species (including amongst many others mosquitoes, [1] Drosophila fruit flies, [2] [3] flour beetles, [4] snout moths [5] and parasitoid wasps [6] ), as well as in mites [7] and woodlice. [8] Aside from Wolbachia, CI can be induced by the bacteria Cardinium, [9] Rickettsiella , [10] Candidatus Mesenet longicola [11] [12] and Spiroplasma . [13] CI is currently being exploited as a mechanism for Wolbachia-mediated disease control in mosquitoes. [14]

Contents

History

CI was first reported in mosquitoes in the 1930s [15] and then studied extensively in the 1950s by Sabbas Ghelelovitch [16] and especially Hannes Laven. [1] Laven apparently was also the first to recognise the potential for CI-induced speciation [17] and population control. [18] The first mathematical model uncovering the population biological principles of CI was presented in 1959. [19] In 1971, Janice Yen and A. Ralph Barr demonstrated the etiologic relationship between Wolbachia infection and cytoplasmic incompatibility in Culex mosquitos when they found that eggs were killed when the sperm of Wolbachia-infected males fertilized infection-free eggs. [20] The discovery that Wolbachia is very common and widely distributed across arthropods [21] [22] lead to a surge in research on CI in the 1990s and 2000s. Several landmark studies in the 2010s [23] [24] [25] paved the way to use CI-inducing Wolbachia for controlling suppressing diseases such as dengue fever in mosquitoes. [26] [14]

Symptoms

Unidirectional CI: Mating of infected males and uninfected females results in CI. All other crosses are compatible. Bidirectional CI: Mating of males infected with Wolbachia strain I and females infected by Wolbachia strain II (and vice versa) results in CI. Uni bidirectional ci.png
Unidirectional CI: Mating of infected males and uninfected females results in CI. All other crosses are compatible.
Bidirectional CI: Mating of males infected with Wolbachia strain I and females infected by Wolbachia strain II (and vice versa) results in CI.

CI occurs when a Wolbachia infected male mates with a female that is infected by another Wolbachia strain (bidirectional CI) or is uninfected (unidirectional CI). Any other combination of un-/infected male/female crosses are compatible. An infected female is compatible with any uninfected male, or with any male infected with the same Wolbachia strain. On the other hand, an uninfected female is only compatible with an uninfected male. In other words, if the male is infected by a CI-inducing strain of Wolbachia that is non-existent in its mate, it is an incompatible cross. [27] Turelli et al. 2018 finds that CI can be resolved by infection of the females with the same strain that is affecting the males, which imposes a population level incentive in favour of CI-inducing strains of Wolbachia. They also find that this propagates the WO phage. [28] Hosts can be cured from Wolbachia infection by antibiotic use.

In diploid organisms CI leads to embryonic mortality. In contrast, CI in haplodiploid hosts can also manifest as embryonic mortality, but may also in some species lead to haploid offspring that then develop into males. The closely related species of the wasp Nasonia show embryonic mortality as well as male development among incompatible crosses. In N. vitripennis, however, the vast majority of the CI embryos are converted into males. [29]

Cellular mechanism

There are two distinguished events that lead to the CI inducing manipulation. The first occurs inside the Wolbachia infected male during spermatogenesis and is called modification. Because Wolbachia are absent from mature sperm and appear to be excluded during the individualization process, the modification must occur before the conclusion of spermatogenesis. [30] The second event, called rescue, takes place inside the fertilized egg where Wolbachia presence prevents CI from occurring. As long as the Wolbachia strains in egg and sperm cells correspond, harmful effects cannot be observed on a cellular level.

A major consequence of CI is the delayed entry into mitosis of the male pronucleus. As a secondary consequence, stemming from this asynchrony, the paternal chromosomes do not properly condense and align on the metaphase plate during the first mitosis. As a consequence, only the maternal chromosome segregate normally, producing haploid embryos. [31] The rescue of CI by infected eggs leads to the restoration of synchrony between the female and the male pronucleus. [31] [32]

The exact mechanisms of how Wolbachia perform modification and rescue are unknown. In Drosophila, the earliest effects caused by CI can already be observed during the sperm chromatin remodeling of the paternal chromosomes. [33] However, it was also observed that in other host species, the defects caused by CI only occur much later in development. [34]

Population biology

CI is a manipulative phenotype that can lead to the rapid spread of the bacteria inducing it. CI results in the death of uninfected offspring and therefore the infected offspring benefit from reduced competition within the population. When the CI-inducing bacteria are rare in the population, there will be only few incompatible matings and selection (or drive) towards higher frequencies will only be weak. However, the more common the bacteria become, the stronger the selection and hence the faster their spread through the population (positive frequency-dependent selection). Unimpeded, the bacteria can therefore quickly reach infection frequencies of 100%. [19]

However, a number of empirically well-documented factors can slow down or even prevent the spread of CI-inducing agents. [35] These include imperfect maternal transmission, reduced fitness of infected individuals, or incomplete CI. When maternal transmission is incomplete and/or infected females have a reduced fitness, an 'infection threshold' arises so that the bacteria spread from an initial frequency above this threshold but become extinct when their initial frequency is below the threshold. [36] The invasion threshold may be overcome through random genetic drift and therefore facilitated by small (at least locally) population sizes. [35]

More complex scenarios than that of a simple host population have been explored through mathematical models, including models with more than one strain or species of maternally inherited bacteria, [37] structured host populations, [38] random genetic drift [39] and overlapping generations. [40]

Evolutionary implications

CI, as described by Werren, [27] results in selection pressure on uninfected males, as infected females can mate both with uninfected males and infected males, but uninfected females cannot mate with infected males. As Wolbachia are only transmitted by females, this mechanism promotes the spread of Wolbachia and therefore keeps Wolbachia from dying out because of incomplete transmission. This has led to discoveries in control of disease transmission by using Wolbachia to control the reproduction of a population by introducing Wolbachia-infected males. [41] This has been seen in the Aedes, mosquito, family, in the Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti species.

Speciation

It is speculated that CI can lead to "rapid speciation". [27] When two populations of the same species are infected by two Wolbachia strains A and B, they might be bidirectionally incompatible and crosses between the two populations do not lead to viable offspring. Thus gene flow between these two populations is interrupted, leading to constant segregation in development and, finally, to speciation. The populations develop to a point where incompatibility would be maintained even in absence of Wolbachia.

See also

Related Research Articles

<i>Drosophila</i> Genus of flies

Drosophila is a genus of flies, belonging to the family Drosophilidae, whose members are often called "small fruit flies" or pomace flies, vinegar flies, or wine flies, a reference to the characteristic of many species to linger around overripe or rotting fruit. They should not be confused with the Tephritidae, a related family, which are also called fruit flies ; tephritids feed primarily on unripe or ripe fruit, with many species being regarded as destructive agricultural pests, especially the Mediterranean fruit fly.

<i>Aedes albopictus</i> Species of mosquito

Aedes albopictus, from the mosquito (Culicidae) family, also known as the (Asian) tiger mosquito or forest mosquito, is a mosquito native to the tropical and subtropical areas of Southeast Asia. In the past few centuries, however, this species has spread to many countries through the transport of goods and international travel. It is characterized by the white bands on its legs and body.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Arbovirus</span> Class of viruses which are transmitted by arthropods

Arbovirus is an informal name for any virus that is transmitted by arthropod vectors. The term arbovirus is a portmanteau word. Tibovirus is sometimes used to more specifically describe viruses transmitted by ticks, a superorder within the arthropods. Arboviruses can affect both animals and plants. In humans, symptoms of arbovirus infection generally occur 3–15 days after exposure to the virus and last three or four days. The most common clinical features of infection are fever, headache, and malaise, but encephalitis and viral hemorrhagic fever may also occur.

<i>Wolbachia</i> Genus of bacteria in the Alphaproteobacteria class

Wolbachia is a genus of gram-negative bacteria that can either infect many species of arthropod as an intracellular parasite, or act as a mutualistic microbe in filarial nematodes. It is one of the most common parasitic microbes of arthropods, and is possibly the most common reproductive parasite in the biosphere. Its interactions with its hosts are often complex. Some host species cannot reproduce, or even survive, without Wolbachia colonisation. One study concluded that more than 16% of neotropical insect species carry bacteria of this genus, and as many as 25 to 70% of all insect species are estimated to be potential hosts.

<i>Spiroplasma</i> Genus of bacteria

Spiroplasma is a genus of Mollicutes, a group of small bacteria without cell walls. Spiroplasma shares the simple metabolism, parasitic lifestyle, fried-egg colony morphology and small genome of other Mollicutes, but has a distinctive helical morphology, unlike Mycoplasma. It has a spiral shape and moves in a corkscrew motion. Many Spiroplasma are found either in the gut or haemolymph of insects where they can act to manipulate host reproduction, or defend the host as endosymbionts. Spiroplasma are also disease-causing agents in the phloem of plants. Spiroplasmas are fastidious organisms, which require a rich culture medium. Typically they grow well at 30 °C, but not at 37 °C. A few species, notably Spiroplasma mirum, grow well at 37 °C, and cause cataracts and neurological damage in suckling mice. The best studied species of spiroplasmas are Spiroplasma poulsonii, a reproductive manipulator and defensive insect symbiont, Spiroplasma citri, the causative agent of citrus stubborn disease, and Spiroplasma kunkelii, the causative agent of corn stunt disease.

Intragenomic conflict refers to the evolutionary phenomenon where genes have phenotypic effects that promote their own transmission in detriment of the transmission of other genes that reside in the same genome. The selfish gene theory postulates that natural selection will increase the frequency of those genes whose phenotypic effects cause their transmission to new organisms, and most genes achieve this by cooperating with other genes in the same genome to build an organism capable of reproducing and/or helping kin to reproduce. The assumption of the prevalence of intragenomic cooperation underlies the organism-centered concept of inclusive fitness. However, conflict among genes in the same genome may arise both in events related to reproduction and altruism.

<i>Aedes aegypti</i> Species of mosquito

Aedes aegypti, the yellow fever mosquito, is a mosquito that can spread dengue fever, chikungunya, Zika fever, Mayaro and yellow fever viruses, and other disease agents. The mosquito can be recognized by black and white markings on its legs and a marking in the form of a lyre on the upper surface of its thorax. This mosquito originated in Africa, but is now found in tropical, subtropical and temperate regions throughout the world.

<i>Trichogramma</i> Genus of parasitic insects

Trichogramma is a genus of minute polyphagous wasps that are endoparasitoids of insect eggs. Trichogramma is one of around 80 genera from the family Trichogrammatidae, with over 200 species worldwide.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mosquito control</span> Efforts to reduce damage from mosquitoes

Mosquito control manages the population of mosquitoes to reduce their damage to human health, economies, and enjoyment. Mosquito control is a vital public-health practice throughout the world and especially in the tropics because mosquitoes spread many diseases, such as malaria and the Zika virus.

<i>Drosophila simulans</i> Species of fly

Drosophila simulans is a species of fly closely related to D. melanogaster, belonging to the same melanogaster species subgroup. Its closest relatives are D. mauritiana and D. sechellia.

The mechanisms of reproductive isolation are a collection of evolutionary mechanisms, behaviors and physiological processes critical for speciation. They prevent members of different species from producing offspring, or ensure that any offspring are sterile. These barriers maintain the integrity of a species by reducing gene flow between related species.

Paratransgenesis is a technique that attempts to eliminate a pathogen from vector populations through transgenesis of a symbiont of the vector. The goal of this technique is to control vector-borne diseases. The first step is to identify proteins that prevent the vector species from transmitting the pathogen. The genes coding for these proteins are then introduced into the symbiont, so that they can be expressed in the vector. The final step in the strategy is to introduce these transgenic symbionts into vector populations in the wild. One use of this technique is to prevent mortality for humans from insect-borne diseases. Preventive methods and current controls against vector-borne diseases depend on insecticides, even though some mosquito breeds may be resistant to them. There are other ways to fully eliminate them. “Paratransgenesis focuses on utilizing genetically modified insect symbionts to express molecules within the vector that are deleterious to pathogens they transmit.” The acidic bacteria Asaia symbionts are beneficial in the normal development of mosquito larvae; however, it is unknown what Asais symbionts do to adult mosquitoes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Confused flour beetle</span> Species of beetle

The confused flour beetle, a type of darkling beetle known as a flour beetle, is a common pest insect known for attacking and infesting stored flour and grain. They are one of the most common and most destructive insect pests for grain and other food products stored in silos, warehouses, grocery stores, and homes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mosquito-borne disease</span> Diseases caused by bacteria, viruses or parasites transmitted by mosquitoes

Mosquito-borne diseases or mosquito-borne illnesses are diseases caused by bacteria, viruses or parasites transmitted by mosquitoes. Nearly 700 million people get a mosquito-borne illness each year, resulting in over 725,000 deaths.

Delftia tsuruhatensis is a Gram-negative, rod-shaped, catalase- and oxidase-positive, motile bacterium from the Comamonadaceae family. It was first isolated from a wastewater treatment plant in Japan in 2003. D. tsuruhatensis is an opportunistic and emergent pathogen. All documented human infections are healthcare-associated.

Arsenophonus nasoniae is a species of bacterium which was previously isolated from Nasonia vitripennis, a species of parasitoid wasp. These wasps are generalists which afflict the larvae of parasitic carrion flies such as blowflies, houseflies and flesh flies. A. nasoniae belongs to the phylum Pseudomonadota and family Morganellaceae. The genus Arsenophonus, has a close relationship to the Proteus (bacterium) rather than to that of Salmonella and Escherichia. The genus is composed of gammaproteobacterial, secondary-endosymbionts which are gram-negative. Cells are non-flagellated, non-motile, non-spore forming and form long to highly filamentous rods. Cellular division is exhibited through septation. The name 'Arsenophonus nasoniae gen. nov., sp. nov.' was therefore proposed for the discovered bacterium due to its characteristics and its microbial interaction with N. vitripennis. The type strain of A. nasoniae is Strain SKI4.

Muscidifurax uniraptor is a species of wasp in the family Pteromalidae. The species does not currently have a common name. M. uniraptor is a pupal parasitoid of synanthropic filth-breeding Diptera and is a natural enemy of the housefly Musca domestica and the stable fly Stomoxys calcitrans.

<i>Drosophila quinaria</i> species group Species group of the subgenus Drosophila

The Drosophila quinaria species group is a speciose lineage of mushroom-feeding flies studied for their specialist ecology, their parasites, population genetics, and the evolution of immune systems. Quinaria species are part of the Drosophila subgenus.

<i>Drosophila innubila</i> Species of fly

Drosophila innubila is a species of vinegar fly restricted to high-elevation woodlands in the mountains of the southern USA and Mexico, which it likely colonized during the last glacial period. Drosophila innubila is a kind of mushroom-breeding Drosophila, and member of the Drosophila quinaria species group. Drosophila innubila is best known for its association with a strain of male-killing Wolbachia bacteria. These bacteria are parasitic, as they drain resources from the host and cause half the infected female's eggs to abort. However Wolbachia may offer benefits to the fly's fitness in certain circumstances. The D. innubila genome was sequenced in 2019.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cardinium</span> Genus of bacteria

"Candidatus Cardinium" is a genus of Gram-negative parasitic bacteria that reside within cells of some arthropods and nematodes. Although they have not yet been isolated in pure culture, they are known to negatively influence reproduction in their hosts in order to further their own proliferation. This leads to their classification as a reproductive parasite. One of the only other examples of this type of parasitism is the genus Wolbachia, which also infects arthropods. These two genera can also co-infect the same animal, as in some nematodes. "Candidatus Cardinium" bacteria use many of the same methods to interfere with host reproduction as Wolbachia, including inducing cytoplasmic incompatibility and distorting the sex ratio in the host population to favor females. The mechanisms by which "Candidatus Cardinium" induces these conditions in hosts are thought to be different from the mechanisms used by Wolbachia. "Candidatus Cardinium" bacteria are maternally inherited; infections are maintained through generations through the egg cells. It is estimated that 6–10% of all arthropods are infected with "Candidatus Cardinium" bacteria.

References

  1. 1 2 Laven, Hannes (1951). "Crossing Experiments with Culex Strains". Evolution. 5 (4): 370–375. doi:10.2307/2405682. ISSN   0014-3820. JSTOR   2405682 . Retrieved November 1, 2023.
  2. ↑ Hoffmann, Ary A.; Turelli, Michael; Simmons, Gail M. (July 1986). "Unidirectional incompatibility between populations of Drosophila simulans". Evolution. 40 (4): 692–701. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1986.tb00531.x. ISSN   1558-5646. PMID   28556160. S2CID   43623751.
  3. ↑ Hoffmann, A. A.; Clancy, D. J.; Merton, E. (March 1994). "Cytoplasmic Incompatibility in Australian Populations of Drosophila Melanogaster". Genetics. 136 (3): 993–999. doi:10.1093/genetics/136.3.993. ISSN   0016-6731. PMC   1205902 . PMID   8005448.
  4. ↑ Wade, M. J.; Stevens, L. (February 1, 1985). "Microorganism mediated reproductive isolation in flour beetles (genus Tribolium)". Science. 227 (4686): 527–528. Bibcode:1985Sci...227..527W. doi:10.1126/science.3966160. ISSN   0036-8075. PMID   3966160.
  5. ↑ Sasaki, Tetsuhiko; Ishikawa, Hajime (October 1999). "Wolbachia Infections and Cytoplasmic Incompatibility in the Almond Moth and the Mediterranean Flour Moth". Zoological Science. 16 (5): 739–744. doi: 10.2108/zsj.16.739 . ISSN   0289-0003. S2CID   85734865 . Retrieved November 1, 2023.
  6. ↑ Breeuwer, J. A.; Werren, J. H. (August 9, 1990). "Microorganisms associated with chromosome destruction and reproductive isolation between two insect species". Nature. 346 (6284): 558–560. Bibcode:1990Natur.346..558B. doi:10.1038/346558a0. ISSN   0028-0836. PMID   2377229. S2CID   4255393.
  7. ↑ Breeuwer, Johannes A. J. (July 1997). "Wolbachia and cytoplasmic incompatibility in the spider mites Tetranychus urticae and T. turkestani". Heredity. 79 (1): 41–47. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1997.121 . ISSN   1365-2540. S2CID   42865450 . Retrieved November 1, 2023.
  8. ↑ Moret, Y; Juchault, P; Rigaud, T (March 2001). "Wolbachia endosymbiont responsible for cytoplasmic incompatibility in a terrestrial crustacean: effects in natural and foreign hosts". Heredity. 86 (3): 325–332. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00831.x . ISSN   0018-067X. PMID   11488969. S2CID   20992807 . Retrieved November 1, 2023.
  9. ↑ Gotoh, T.; Noda, H.; Ito, S. (January 2007). "Cardinium symbionts cause cytoplasmic incompatibility in spider mites". Heredity. 98 (1): 13–20. doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800881 . ISSN   1365-2540. PMID   17035954. S2CID   7840761 . Retrieved November 1, 2023.
  10. ↑ Rosenwald, Laura C.; Sitvarin, Michael I.; White, Jennifer A. (July 7, 2020). "Endosymbiotic Rickettsiella causes cytoplasmic incompatibility in a spider host". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 287 (1930). doi:10.1098/rspb.2020.1107. PMC   7423472 . PMID   32635864.
  11. ↑ Takano, Shun-Ichiro; Tuda, Midori; Takasu, Keiji; Furuya, Naruto; Imamura, Yuya; Kim, Sangwan; Tashiro, Kosuke; Iiyama, Kazuhiro; Tavares, Matias; Amaral, Acacio Cardoso (June 6, 2017). "Unique clade of alphaproteobacterial endosymbionts induces complete cytoplasmic incompatibility in the coconut beetle". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 114 (23): 6110–6115. Bibcode:2017PNAS..114.6110T. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1618094114 . ISSN   1091-6490. PMC   5468645 . PMID   28533374.
  12. ↑ Takano, Shun-ichiro; Gotoh, Yasuhiro; Hayashi, Tetsuya (August 1, 2021). ""Candidatus Mesenet longicola": Novel Endosymbionts of Brontispa longissima that Induce Cytoplasmic Incompatibility". Microbial Ecology. 82 (2): 512–522. doi:10.1007/s00248-021-01686-y. ISSN   1432-184X. PMID   33454808. S2CID   231636124 . Retrieved November 1, 2023.
  13. ↑ Pollmann, Marie; Moore, Logan D.; Krimmer, Elena; D'Alvise, Paul; Hasselmann, Martin; Perlman, Steve J.; Ballinger, Matthew J.; Steidle, Johannes L.M.; Gottlieb, Yuval (2022). "Highly transmissible cytoplasmic incompatibility by the extracellular insect symbiont Spiroplasma". iScience. Elsevier BV. 25 (5): 104335. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104335 . ISSN   2589-0042. PMC   9118660 .
  14. 1 2 Ross, Perran A.; Turelli, Michael; Hoffmann, Ary A. (December 3, 2019). "Evolutionary Ecology of Wolbachia Releases for Disease Control". Annual Review of Genetics. 53: 93–116. doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-112618-043609. ISSN   1545-2948. PMC   6944334 . PMID   31505135.
  15. ↑ Marshall, John Frederick (1938). The British Mosquitoes. Trustees of the British Museum.
  16. ↑ Ghelelovitch, S. (1952). "Sur le determinisme génétique de la stérilitée dans le croisement entre differentes souches de Culex autogenicus Roubaud". Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances de l'Académie des Sciences. 234 (24): 2386–2388.
  17. ↑ Laven, Hannes (January 1, 1959). "Speciation by Cytoplasmic Isolation in the Culex Pipiens-Complex". Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology. 24: 166–173. doi:10.1101/SQB.1959.024.01.017. ISSN   0091-7451. PMID   14414640 . Retrieved November 1, 2023.
  18. ↑ Laven, H. (October 1967). "Eradication of Culex pipiens fatigans through Cytoplasmic Incompatibility". Nature. 216 (5113): 383–384. Bibcode:1967Natur.216..383L. doi:10.1038/216383a0. ISSN   1476-4687. PMID   4228275. S2CID   36662629 . Retrieved November 1, 2023.
  19. 1 2 Caspari, Ernst; Watson, G. S. (1959). "On the Evolutionary Importance of Cytoplasmic Sterility in Mosquitoes". Evolution. Oxford University Press (OUP). 13 (4): 568. doi:10.2307/2406138. ISSN   0014-3820.
  20. ↑ Yen, J. H.; Barr, A. R. (1971). "New hypothesis of the cause of cytoplasmic incompatibility in Culex pipiens". Nature. 232 (5313): 657–658. Bibcode:1971Natur.232..657Y. doi:10.1038/232657a0. PMID   4937405. S2CID   4146003.
  21. ↑ Werren, John H.; Windsor, Donald; Guo, Li Rong (January 1997). "Distribution of Wolbachia among neotropical arthropods". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. 262 (1364): 197–204. doi:10.1098/rspb.1995.0196. S2CID   86540721 . Retrieved November 1, 2023.
  22. ↑ Werren, John H.; Windsor, Donald M. (July 7, 2000). "Wolbachia infection frequencies in insects: evidence of a global equilibrium?". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. 267 (1450): 1277–1285. doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1139. ISSN   0962-8452. PMC   1690679 . PMID   10972121.
  23. ↑ Hedges, Lauren M.; Brownlie, Jeremy C.; O'Neill, Scott L.; Johnson, Karyn N. (October 31, 2008). "Wolbachia and Virus Protection in Insects". Science. 322 (5902): 702. Bibcode:2008Sci...322..702H. doi:10.1126/science.1162418. PMID   18974344. S2CID   206514799 . Retrieved November 1, 2023.
  24. ↑ Moreira, Luciano A.; Iturbe-Ormaetxe, Iñaki; Jeffery, Jason A.; Lu, Guangjin; Pyke, Alyssa T.; Hedges, Lauren M.; Rocha, Bruno C.; Hall-Mendelin, Sonja; Day, Andrew; Riegler, Markus; Hugo, Leon E.; Johnson, Karyn N.; Kay, Brian H.; McGraw, Elizabeth A.; Hurk, Andrew F. van den; Ryan, Peter A.; O'Neill, Scott L. (December 24, 2009). "A Wolbachia Symbiont in Aedes aegypti Limits Infection with Dengue, Chikungunya, and Plasmodium". Cell. 139 (7): 1268–1278. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.11.042 . ISSN   0092-8674. PMID   20064373. S2CID   2018937 . Retrieved November 1, 2023.
  25. ↑ Teixeira, Luís; Ferreira, Álvaro; Ashburner, Michael (December 23, 2008). "The Bacterial Symbiont Wolbachia Induces Resistance to RNA Viral Infections in Drosophila melanogaster". PLOS Biology. 6 (12): –1000002. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000002 . ISSN   1545-7885. PMC   2605931 . PMID   19222304.
  26. ↑ Hoffmann, Ary A.; et al. (2011). "Successful establishment of Wolbachia in Aedes populations to suppress dengue transmission". Nature. 476 (7361): 454–457. Bibcode:2011Natur.476..454H. doi:10.1038/nature10356. PMID   21866160. S2CID   4316652 . Retrieved November 1, 2023.
  27. 1 2 3 Werren, J (1997). "Biology of Wolbachia" (PDF). Annual Review of Entomology. 42: 587–609. doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.42.1.587. PMID   15012323.
  28. ↑ Kirsch, Joshua M.; Brzozowski, Robert S.; Faith, Dominick; Round, June L.; Secor, Patrick R.; Duerkop, Breck A. (September 29, 2021). "Bacteriophage-Bacteria Interactions in the Gut: From Invertebrates to Mammals". Annual Review of Virology . Annual Reviews. 8 (1): 95–113. doi:10.1146/annurev-virology-091919-101238. ISSN   2327-056X. PMC   8484061 . PMID   34255542.
  29. ↑ Tram, U, Fredrick, K, Werren, J, Sullivan, W (2006). "Paternal chromosome segregation during the first mitotic division determines Wolbachia-induced cytoplasmic incompatibility phenotype", J. Cell Sci. 119, 10.1242/jcs.03095. http://jcs.biologists.org/cgi/content/abstract/119/17/3655
  30. ↑ Snook, R; Cleland, S; Wolfner, M; Karr, T (2000). "Offsetting Effects of Wolbachia Infection and Heat Shock on Sperm Production in Drosophila simulans: Analyses of Fecundity, Fertility and Accessory Gland Proteins". Genetics. 155 (1): 167–178. doi:10.1093/genetics/155.1.167. PMC   1461085 . PMID   10790392.
  31. 1 2 Tram, U; Sullivan, W (2002). "Role of delayed nuclear envelope breakdown and mitosis in Wolbachia-induced cytoplasmic incompability". Science. 296 (5570): 1124–1126. Bibcode:2002Sci...296.1124T. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.625.2871 . doi:10.1126/science.1070536. PMID   12004132. S2CID   23831610.
  32. ↑ Lassy, C; Karr, T (1996). "Cytological analysis of fertilization and early embryonic development in incompatible crosses of Drosophila simulans". Mechanisms of Development. 57 (1): 47–58. doi: 10.1016/0925-4773(96)00527-8 . PMID   8817452.
  33. ↑ Landmann, F; Orsi, GA; Loppin, B; Sullivan, W (2009). "Wolbachia-Mediated Cytoplasmic Incompatibility Is Associated with Impaired Histone Deposition in the Male Pronucleus". PLOS Pathog. 5 (3): e1000343. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000343 . PMC   2652114 . PMID   19300496.
  34. ↑ Duron, O; Weill, M (2006). "Wolbachia infection influences the development of Culex pipiens embryo in incompatible crosses". Heredity. 96 (6): 493–500. doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800831 . PMID   16639421.
  35. 1 2 Stouthamer, R.; Breeuwer, J. A. J.; Hurst, G. D. D. (1999). "Wolbachia Pipientis: Microbial Manipulator of Arthropod Reproduction". Annual Review of Microbiology. Annual Reviews. 53 (1): 71–102. doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.53.1.71. ISSN   0066-4227.
  36. ↑ Fine, Paul E.M. (1978). "On the dynamics of symbiote-dependent cytoplasmic incompatibility in culicine mosquitoes". Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. Elsevier BV. 31 (1): 10–18. doi:10.1016/0022-2011(78)90102-7. ISSN   0022-2011.
  37. ↑ Frank, Steven A. (1998). "Dynamics of Cytoplasmic Incompatability with Multiple Wolbachia Infections". Journal of Theoretical Biology. Elsevier BV. 192 (2): 213–218. doi:10.1006/jtbi.1998.0652. ISSN   0022-5193.
  38. ↑ Engelstädter, J; Telschow, A (May 13, 2009). "Cytoplasmic incompatibility and host population structure". Heredity. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. 103 (3): 196–207. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2009.53 . ISSN   0018-067X.
  39. ↑ Jansen, Vincent A.A; Turelli, Michael; Godfray, H. Charles J (August 26, 2008). "Stochastic spread of Wolbachia". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. The Royal Society. 275 (1652): 2769–2776. doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.0914. ISSN   0962-8452. PMC   2605827 .
  40. ↑ Turelli, Michael (2010). "Cytoplasmic incompatibility in populations with overlapping generations". Evolution. Wiley. 64 (1): 232–241. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00822.x . ISSN   0014-3820.
  41. ↑ Zabalou, Sofia; Riegler, Markus; Theodorakopoulou, Marianna (September 9, 2004). "Wolbachia-induced cytoplasmic incompatibility as a means for insect pest population control". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 101 (42): 15042–15045. Bibcode:2004PNAS..10115042Z. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0403853101 . PMC   524042 . PMID   15469918.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.