David Collier (political scientist)

Last updated
David Collier
Born (1942-02-17) February 17, 1942 (age 82)
Chicago, Illinois, U.S.
Education
Occupation Political scientist
Awards Johan Skytte Prize in Political Science (2014)
Scientific career
Institutions University of California, Berkeley
Doctoral advisor Philippe C. Schmitter
Doctoral students Steven Levitsky, Ben Ross Schneider, Deborah J. Yashar

David Collier (born February 17, 1942) is an American political scientist specializing in comparative politics. He is Chancellor's Professor Emeritus at the University of California, Berkeley. He works in the fields of comparative politics, Latin American politics, and methodology. [1] His father was the anthropologist Donald Collier. [2]

Contents

Biography

Collier was born in Chicago, Illinois in 1942. He has a B.A. from Harvard University in 1965, and a Ph.D. in political science from the University of Chicago in 1971. [1]

After receiving his PhD, Collier taught at Indiana University, Bloomington, where he was promoted from Assistant to Associate Professor in 1975. [3] He joined the Political Science Department at Berkeley in 1978. [4] At Berkeley, Collier has been Chair of the Political Science Department and of the Center for Latin American Studies, and he was founding co-director of the Berkeley-Stanford Program in Latin American Studies. At Berkeley he was centrally involved in training scholars in the fields of Latin American politics, comparative politics, and methodology, and he won Berkeley's campus-wide Distinguished Faculty Mentor Award. [5]

Collier has served as President of the Comparative Politics Section, American Political Science Association (APSA); has been a Vice President of APSA; and was the founding President of the APSA Organized Section for Qualitative and Multi-Method Research. Collier has played an active role in building the Institute for Qualitative and Multi-Method Research (IQMR), an international training program held annually at Syracuse University. [6]

Collier received a Guggenheim Fellowship and was a Fellow at the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences. [1]

Awards and honors

The "David Collier Mid-Career Achievement Award," of the APSA Organized Section for Qualitative and Multi-Method Research, was named after Collier in 2010. [11]

Academic research

Collier was initially known for his work on Latin American politics. In the second half of his career, he focused on methodology. [12] Following his retirement from teaching, he returned to the topic of critical junctures and co-edited Critical Junctures and Historical Legacies: Insights and Methods for Comparative Social Science (2022). [13]

Comparative politics and Latin America

A first strand of Collier's work focuses on Latin American politics and the broader field of comparative politics. This early work includes quantitative cross-national research on political regimes, corporatism, and social policy, as well as an exploration of the links between regime change and public policy toward squatter settlements in Peru, which was published as Squatters and Oligarchs: Authoritarian Rule and Policy Change in Peru (1976). [14] His two major works on Latin American politics are his edited volume The New Authoritarianism in Latin America (1979), and his coauthored Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America (1991).

The New Authoritarianism in Latin America

In The New Authoritarianism in Latin America (1979), [15] Collier and several leading scholars in the field, such as Guillermo O'Donnell, Albert O. Hirschman, and Fernando Henrique Cardoso, explore alternative explanations for the rise of authoritarianism in Latin America in the 1960s and 1970s. This work brought the literature on Latin American politics in dialogue with the modernization theory dominant in comparative politics at the time. Focusing on the fact that the most industrialized Latin American countries were not the more democratic ones, it articulated several critiques of the prevailing view of Third World politics put forth by modernization theorists (e.g., Seymour Martin Lipset). Thus, at a time when comparative politics sought to provide a general theory of politics in a way that largely disregarded insights developed by regional experts, Collier's New Authoritarianism provided an alternative, demonstrating that area studies could be a site of creative theorizing. Consequently, The New Authoritarianism in Latin America was a landmark study in the literature on national political regimes and in the study of politics in Latin America, and is one of the most cited political science texts on this region.

Shaping the Political Arena

Collier's most sweeping work on Latin America, the fruit of over a decade of research, is Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America (1991), coauthored with Ruth Berins Collier. This major work makes two fundamental theoretical contributions. The first concerns the linked ideas of (a) critical junctures, periods of crucial change in the history of given countries or other political units that are hypothesized to leave distinctive legacies, and (b) path dependence, the trajectories of change stemming from and constrained by critical junctures. These were, in one sense, not new ideas. The distinctive contribution of Shaping the Political Arena was to turn these ideas into a carefully formulated model directly relevant to research in comparative politics; [16] and to then offer a magisterial application of this model to Latin American cases. This book was the first, and still remains, one of the most systematic formulations and applications of critical junctures and path dependency. It convincingly dispelled whatever doubts may have existed about the potentially decisive effect historical events and turning points could have on key political outcomes, from political regimes to democracy to party systems. The lasting effect of Collier's contribution is evident in many ways. Collier inspired other researchers in the field of comparative politics (e.g., Kathleen Thelen, Paul Pierson, Deborah J. Yashar, and James Mahoney) to fine-tune and further develop the model presented in Shaping the Political Arena. Moreover, the applications that draw on Collier's core ideas about critical junctures and path dependence go beyond political science to economics.

The second theoretical contribution of Shaping the Political Arena concerns Latin American politics. In this regard, Shaping the Political Arena showed how the way in which labor was incorporated into national political institutions had a major and enduring effect on the subsequent evolution of a country's party system and political regimes. Counterintuitively, where the role of labor was greater and where it participated more, the resulting political regime was more stable. This argument was examined through an ambitious comparative historical analysis of eight countries over a period of five decades that relied on four paired comparisons. One of the most controversial pairings was Brazil and Chile; this pairing was questioned by many Latin Americanists and experts on labor in Latin America. In retrospect, however, this choice has been vindicated. Nowadays it has become commonplace to see Brazil and Chile as exemplifying a common trajectory with regard to political and economic development. In brief, Shaping the Political Arena makes a major theoretical contribution through its elaboration of a critical juncture and path dependency model and also stands as the most ambitious and systematic work on Latin America in the tradition of comparative-historical analysis.

Methodology

A second strand of Collier's work focuses on methodology, an area in which Collier has focused attention of setting standards for rigorous qualitative research, as well as multi-method work that combines qualitative and quantitative methods. Collier's key publications on methodology are the co-edited Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards (2004/2010) and The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology (2008).

Concepts and typologies

One major contribution concerns the centrality of concepts in political science research and the methodological issues of concept formation and conceptual change. Extending the tradition of Giovanni Sartori, Collier makes distinctive, original contributions. In his widely cited "Democracy with Adjectives" (coauthored, World Politics 1997), [17] Collier shows how the analysis of concepts can help bring order to research characterized by great conceptual innovation, but perhaps not surprisingly also conceptual disorder. In particular, he shows how the explicit disaggregation of this concept and attention to its internal structure clarifies alternative meanings, and thereby contributes incisively to producing and accumulating knowledge

Collier has also made an important contribution to political science by refocusing attention on typologies. [18] Collier shows that typologies, when used carefully and systematically, can help form the key concepts in substantive research and are also an essential tool for theorizing. Moreover, in various publications, Collier has shown how decisions regarding conceptualization affect measurement, and he has offered guidelines regarding such issues as the choice of indicators and decisions regarding levels of measurement (e.g., whether the concept is operationalized in dichotomous or graded terms). Together, Collier's ideas add up to a forceful statement for seeing concept analysis as a central challenge in political science research and provide an indispensable guide regarding the methodological tools for tackling this challenge.

Causal inference and qualitative research

Another of Collier's central contributions concerns qualitative tools for causal inference. Here, central thrusts of Collier's work have been to put ideas about process tracing on a far more secure footing, and more broadly to codify procedures for qualitative causal inference. This work, published in Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards (1st. ed. 2004, 2nd. ed. 2010, coedited with Henry Brady), and in articles in leading journals, challenges the conventional view that statistical tools are always more powerful for causal inference. Most pointedly, Collier makes a strong case that qualitative researchers actually have an advantage over their quantitative counterparts. This advantage derives from the focus on "causal-process observations" in qualitative analysis. These may be defined as pieces of data that provide information about context and mechanisms, and that offer distinctive leverage in making causal inferences. In this work, as in his work on concepts, Collier has been keenly concerned with exploring how qualitative research can be improved by drawing attention to the multiple challenges faced by qualitative researchers. But Collier has also stressed that both quantitative and qualitative researchers face daunting methodological challenges, and this, in turn, requires a more evenhanded assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of both quantitative and qualitative methods.

Another direction of Collier's work, which springs from the recognition of the shared challenges faced by quantitative and qualitative researchers, has been the exploration of multi-method strategies. Collier's efforts to move beyond traditional methodological boundaries can be seen most vividly in Rethinking Social Inquiry and also in The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology (2008, co-edited with Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier and Henry E. Brady).

Major works

Books

See also

Related Research Articles

A case study is an in-depth, detailed examination of a particular case within a real-world context. For example, case studies in medicine may focus on an individual patient or ailment; case studies in business might cover a particular firm's strategy or a broader market; similarly, case studies in politics can range from a narrow happening over time like the operations of a specific political campaign, to an enormous undertaking like world war, or more often the policy analysis of real-world problems affecting multiple stakeholders.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Democratization</span> Society becoming more democratic

Democratization, or democratisation, is the structural government transition from an authoritarian government to a more democratic political regime, including substantive political changes moving in a democratic direction.

Arend d'Angremond Lijphart is a Dutch-American political scientist specializing in comparative politics, elections and voting systems, democratic institutions, and ethnicity and politics. He is Research Professor Emeritus of Political Science at the University of California, San Diego. He is influential for his work on consociational democracy and his contribution to the new Institutionalism in political science.

Modernization theory holds that as societies become more economically modernized, wealthier and more educated, their political institutions become increasingly liberal democratic. The "classical" theories of modernization of the 1950s and 1960s, most influentially articulated by Seymour Lipset, drew on sociological analyses of Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, Max Weber, and Talcott Parsons. Modernization theory was a dominant paradigm in the social sciences in the 1950s and 1960s, and saw a resurgence after 1991, when Francis Fukuyama wrote about the end of the Cold War as confirmation on modernization theory.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Comparative politics</span> Field in political science

Comparative politics is a field in political science characterized either by the use of the comparative method or other empirical methods to explore politics both within and between countries. Substantively, this can include questions relating to political institutions, political behavior, conflict, and the causes and consequences of economic development. When applied to specific fields of study, comparative politics may be referred to by other names, such as comparative government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Barrington Moore Jr.</span> American sociologist (1913–2005)

Barrington Moore Jr. was an American political sociologist, and the son of forester Barrington Moore.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Giovanni Sartori</span> Italian academic and political scientist (1924–2017)

Giovanni Sartori was an Italian political scientist who specialized in the study of democracy, political parties, and comparative politics.

Juan José Linz Storch de Gracia was a German-born Spanish sociologist and political scientist specializing in comparative politics. From 1961 he was Sterling Professor Emeritus of Sociology and Political Science at Yale University and later also an honorary member of the Scientific Council at the Juan March Institute. He is best known for his work on authoritarian political regimes and democratization.

Adam Przeworski is a Polish-American professor of political science specializing in comparative politics. He is Carroll and Milton Professor Emeritus in the Department of Politics of New York University. He is a scholar of democratic societies, theory of democracy, social democracy and political economy, as well as an early proponent of rational choice theory in political science.

Historical institutionalism (HI) is a new institutionalist social science approach that emphasizes how timing, sequences and path dependence affect institutions, and shape social, political, economic behavior and change. Unlike functionalist theories and some rational choice approaches, historical institutionalism tends to emphasize that many outcomes are possible, small events and flukes can have large consequences, actions are hard to reverse once they take place, and that outcomes may be inefficient. A critical juncture may set in motion events that are hard to reverse, because of issues related to path dependency. Historical institutionalists tend to focus on history to understand why specific events happen.

Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research is an influential 1994 book written by Gary King, Robert Keohane, and Sidney Verba that lays out guidelines for conducting qualitative research. The central thesis of the book is that qualitative and quantitative research share the same "logic of inference." The book primarily applies lessons from regression-oriented analysis to qualitative research, arguing that the same logics of causal inference can be used in both types of research.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Guillermo O'Donnell</span> Argentine political scientist (1936–2011)

Guillermo Alberto O'Donnell Ure was a prominent Argentine political scientist who specialized in comparative politics and Latin American politics. He spent most of his career working in Argentina and the United States, and who made lasting contributions to theorizing on authoritarianism and democratization, democracy and the state, and the politics of Latin America. His brother is Pacho O'Donnell.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Comparative historical research</span> Method in the social sciences

Comparative historical research is a method of social science that examines historical events in order to create explanations that are valid beyond a particular time and place, either by direct comparison to other historical events, theory building, or reference to the present day. Generally, it involves comparisons of social processes across times and places. It overlaps with historical sociology. While the disciplines of history and sociology have always been connected, they have connected in different ways at different times. This form of research may use any of several theoretical orientations. It is distinguished by the types of questions it asks, not the theoretical framework it employs.

Gerardo L. Munck is a political scientist specializing in comparative politics. He is professor of political science and international relations at the University of Southern California.

Alfred C. Stepan was an American political scientist specializing in comparative politics and Latin American politics. He was the Wallace S. Sayre Professor of Government at Columbia University, where he was also director of the Center for the Study of Democracy, Toleration and Religion. He is known for his comparative politics research on the military, state institutions, democratization, and democracy.

Process tracing is a qualitative research method used to develop and test theories. Process-tracing can be defined as the following: it is the systematic examination of diagnostic evidence selected and analyzed in light of research questions and hypotheses posed by the investigator. Process-tracing thus focuses on (complex) causal relationships between the independent variable(s) and the outcome of the dependent variable(s), evaluates pre-existing hypotheses and discovers new ones. It is generally understood as a "within-case" method to draw inferences on the basis of causal mechanisms, but it can also be used for ideographic research or small-N case-studies. It has been used in social sciences, as well as in natural sciences.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Philippe Schmitter</span> American political scientist (born 1936)

Philippe C. Schmitter is an American political scientist specializing in comparative politics. He is Emeritus Professor of the Department of Political and Social Sciences at the European University Institute.

Critical juncture theory focuses on critical junctures, i.e., large, rapid, discontinuous changes, and the long-term causal effect or historical legacy of these changes. Critical junctures are turning points that alter the course of evolution of some entity. Critical juncture theory seeks to explain both (1) the historical origin and maintenance of social order, and (2) the occurrence of social change through sudden, big leaps.

Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World (1966) is a book by Barrington Moore Jr.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sebastián Mazzuca</span> Argentine professor

Sebastián L. Mazzuca is a professor of political science specializing in comparative politics at Johns Hopkins University. He is known for his research on state formation, state capacity, regime change, political economy and Latin America.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Gerardo L. Munck and Richard Snyder, "David Collier: Critical Junctures, Concepts and Methods," pp. 556-600, in Passion, Craft, and Method in Comparative Politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007, p. 556-57.
  2. ↑ Sullivan, Ronald (1995-02-11). "Donald Collier, Museum Curator And Chicago Anthropologist, 83". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2023-02-17.
  3. ↑ http://webapp1.dlib.indiana.edu/iubot/view?docId=1975-04-05&doc.view=print&toc.depth=1&toc.id=0&brand=iubot [ bare URL ]
  4. ↑ https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/D3C80E2185F88BD63578E27B2E1E2AF2/S1049096514000894a.pdf/people.pdf [ bare URL PDF ]
  5. 1 2 3 "David Collier | American Academy of Arts and Sciences". 28 June 2024.
  6. ↑ https://web.archive.org/web/20110130023449/http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/moynihan/cqrm/The_Institute_for_Qualitative_and_Multi-Method_Research/ [ bare URL ]
  7. ↑ Gerardo L. Munck and Richard Snyder, "David Collier: Critical Junctures, Concepts and Methods," pp. 556-600, in Passion, Craft, and Method in Comparative Politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007, p. 577.
  8. ↑ "AAAS Members Elected as Fellows | American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)".
  9. ↑ https://www.skytteprize.com [ bare URL ]
  10. ↑ http://www.apsanet.org/portals/54/Files/2014_APSA_Awards_PR.pdf [ bare URL PDF ]
  11. ↑ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2021-07-24. Retrieved 2021-07-24.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  12. ↑ Gerardo L. Munck and Richard Snyder, "David Collier: Critical Junctures, Concepts and Methods," pp. 556-600, in Passion, Craft, and Method in Comparative Politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007, pp. 556-57.
  13. ↑ David Collier and Gerardo L. Munck (eds.), Critical Junctures and Historical Legacies: Insights and Methods for Comparative Social Science (Rowman & Littlefield, 2022)
  14. ↑ David Collier, Squatters and Oligarchs: Authoritarian Rule and Policy Change in Peru (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976).
  15. ↑ David Collier (ed.), The New Authoritarianism in Latin America (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979).
  16. ↑ Ruth Berins Collier and David Collier, Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and the Regime Dynamics in Latin America (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991), Ch. 1: "Framework: Critical Junctures and Historical Legacies."
  17. ↑ Collier, David; Levitsky, Steven (1997). "Democracy With Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research". World Politics. 49 (3): 430–51. doi:10.1353/wp.1997.0009. S2CID   11541730.
  18. ↑ Collier, David; LaPorte, Jody; Seawright, Jason (2012). "Putting Typologies to Work: Levels of Measurement, Concept-Formation, and Analytic Rigor". Political Research Quarterly. 65 (2): 217–32. doi:10.1177/1065912912437162. S2CID   8508645.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.