Decidim

Last updated
Decidim (sociopolitical network)
Established2016  OOjs UI icon edit-ltr-progressive.svg (9 years ago)
Types organization   OOjs UI icon edit-ltr-progressive.svg
Aim participatory democracy   OOjs UI icon edit-ltr-progressive.svg
Affiliations City Council of Barcelona   OOjs UI icon edit-ltr-progressive.svg
Website decidim.org   OOjs UI icon edit-ltr-progressive.svg
Decidim (software)
Stable release
0.29.1 [1]   OOjs UI icon edit-ltr-progressive.svg / 3 October 2024
Repository
Written in Ruby on Rails
License software: GNU AGPLv3; content: CC BY-SA; data: Open Database License
Website Official website OOjs UI icon edit-ltr-progressive.svg

Decidim describes itself as a "technopolitical network for participatory democracy". [2] It combines a free and open-source software (FOSS) software package together with a participatory political project and an organising community, "Metadecidim". [3] Decidim participants describe the software, political and organising components as "technical", "political" and "technopolitical" levels, respectively. [4] Decidim's aims can be seen as promoting the right to the city, as proposed by Henri Lefebvre. [5] As of 2023, Decidim instances were actively in use for participatory decision-making in municipal and regional governments and by citizens' associations in Spain, Switzerland and elsewhere. [3] [4] Studies of the use of Decidim found that it was effective in some cases, [3] [4] [5] while in one case implemented top-down in Lucerne, it strengthened the digital divide. [5]

Contents

Creation

A server called "Decidim" was created by the 15M anti-austerity movement in Spain in 2016, running a fork of the "Consul" software, [4] when a political party derived from the protest movement obtained political power. [3] In early 2017, the server was switched to a similarly inspired, but new software project, Decidim, completely rewritten, aiming to be more modular and convenient for development by a wide community. [2] :3,104

The name "Decidim" comes from a Catalan word meaning "let's decide" or "we decide". [2] :1

Software

Decidim uses Ruby on Rails. As of 2022, the software defines two structures: "participatory spaces" and "participatory components". [4] The participatory spaces (six as of early 2024 [2] :3) include "processes" (such as a participatory budget), "assemblies" (such as a citizens' association website), "conferences/meetings", "initiatives", and "consultations (voting/elections)". [5] [4] The participatory components (twelve as of early 2024 [2] :3) range from "comments", "proposals", "amendments", "votes" through to "accountability". Together these allow a wide flexibility in creating specific space–component combinations. [4] The "accountability" component is used to monitor whether and how a project is executed. [2] :4

As of 2022, three user levels are defined: general visitors with view-only access; registered users who have several participation rights; and verified users who can participate in decision-making. Users may be individuals or represent associations or working groups within an organisation. Users with special privileges are called "administrators", "moderators" and "collaborators". [4]

As of 2022, four versions of Decidim had been released. [3]

The Decidim software development strategy is intended to be modular and scalable. As FOSS, the software is intended to encourage both citizen and government interaction with each other and with decision-making power over the software itself, aiming at high levels of traceability and transparency. [4]

Decidim software provides an application programming interface (API) for command line access. [6]

Technopolitical project

In the spirit of the Decidim software being free and open-source software (FOSS), a community of software developers, social activists, software consultancies, researchers, and administrative staff from municipal governments called Metadecidim was created for discussing and analysing Decidim experience and development. [3] Metadecidim is seen as an intermediary component between the political level of Decidim, implemented on servers such as Barcelona Decidim, and the technical level of hosting the software source code and bug reporting structures. [4] As of June 2023, Metadecidim had about 5000 registered participants. [2] :90

The Decidim community has a text called the Decidim Social Contract (DSC) that defines six guidelines. The DSC defines the free software licences that may be used for Decidim software; it defines requirements of transparency, traceability and integrity of content hosted by Decidim software; a goal of equal access to all users and democratic quality parameters to measure progress towards equality; [7] data privacy; and it requires inter-institutional cooperation of institutions implementing instances of the software, in order to encourage further development. [5] The free software licensing is the GNU Affero General Public License (AGPL) version 3 for code; the CC BY-SA licence is used for content; and "data" is published under the Open Database License. [2] :4–5 [7]

Philosophically, the aims of Decidim can be seen as promoting the right to the city, as proposed by Henri Lefebvre. [5] Metadecidim's self-description as "technopolitical" is seen as implying that the political implications of designs and choices of software are seen as significant, in opposition to the view that software is "value neutral and objective". [2] :viii Metadecidim sees Decidim as a "recursively democratic infrastructure", in the sense that the software, political and server infrastructure is "both used and democratised by its community, the Metadecidim community". [2] :2

Decidim proponents see the combination of online and offline participation as fundamental: "From its very conception until today, a distinguishing feature of Decidim over other kinds of participatory democracy software ... was that of connecting digital processes directly with public meetings and vice versa." [2] :74

Organisationally, the community formally established Decidim Association in 2019 and City Council of Barcelona gave control of the Decidim trademark and code base to Decidim Association. The effect was to combine public funds with citizens' association control of decision-making. [2] :3

Use of Decidim

In 2022, Borge and colleagues estimated that there were 311 instances running Decidim in Spain and in 19 other countries; [3] while Borges and colleagues estimated that there were Decidim instances run by 80 local and regional governments and 40 citizens' associations in Spain and elsewhere. [4] In 2023, Suter and colleagues cited Decidim's own estimate of 400 city and regional governments and civil society institutions using Decidim. [5] The Open University of Catalonia, the University of Bordeaux and the University of Caen Normandy ran Decidim instances. [2] :27–28

Decidim Barcelona

A Decidim server was run by the City Council of Barcelona for a two-month trial prior to 2017, in which 40,000 citizens discussed their own proposals and proposals made by the council. The Decidim software allowed threaded discussion, labelling whether the initial comment on a proposal was negative, neutral or positive, and notification to participants. [6]

The two-month trial included both online and face-to-face participation. According to Decidim, about 40% of the 39,000 individual participants did so face-to-face, and about 85% of the organisational participants did so face-to-face. There were about 11,000 proposals made on the Decidim server, of which about 8000 were accepted. The execution of the proposals was monitored during the following four years, spending about 90% of the Barcelona City Council's budget for 2016–2019. [2] :24–25

Zurich and Lucerne

In Switzerland, urban development has legal requirements in relation to citizen participation. Use of Decidim in Zurich and Lucerne in 2021 and 2022 was studied by Suter and colleagues, based on documentary evidence, interviews with 15 people in Zurich and 17 in Lucerne ranging from municipality employees through to representatives of neighbourhood associations, and "participatory observations" (informal participatory events observed by the researchers). The researchers found that the effectiveness of Decidim varied significantly between the different cases, and argued that the "full potential" of Decidim had not yet been achieved in Switzerland. [5]

In Wipkingen in Zurich, two local citizens' associations used a server running Decidim to run a participatory budget to spend CHF  40,000. The project, named "Quartieridee", had 99 submissions of proposals and awarded funding to eight proposals. The researchers found that overall implementation was dependent on significant financial resources and citizens' voluntary work; and had difficulties due to the municipality lacking legal procedures for implementing the citizens' chosen projects. [5]

The project was scaled up to the Zurich city level the following year with the name "Stadtidee" and a participatory budget of CHF  540,000. Among the successful projects was a confrontation between a citizens' association, "Linkes Seeufer für Alle" opposed to a Kibag AG in relation to a plot of land owned by Kibag next to Lake Zurich. An effect of the Decidim networking was that citizens legally occupied the plot of land for several days. [5]

In 2021, the LuzernNord area of Lucerne was an area with many migrants and people with low incomes, at risk of gentrification. A top-down use of a Decidim server by the local administration, in which citizens' associations were encouraged to participate, was found by the researchers to strengthen the digital divide rather than overcoming it. Limitation of the language to German and lack of confidence in being able to participate effectively were found to be specific effects opposing the effectiveness of the project. [5]

Other municipalities

Based on nine in-depth interviews with officials responsible for Decidim, conducted in 2018 in some of the initial municipalities that used Decidim, online interviews in March 2019 with officials from 34 municipalities using Decidim, and data from the Decidim servers, the effectiveness of Decidim in terms of transparency, participation in decision-making, and deliberation (discussion of proposals) was studied by Rosa Borge and colleagues. It was found that the officials saw Decidim's role as primarily promoting transparency and the collecting of citizens' proposals, while having only a modest role in transferring decision-making to citizens and a minor role in encouraging online citizen debate. [3]

Several municipalities' use of Decidim provided their first use of participatory budgeting. [3]

The Borge et al. study also found, consistently with other research, that the participatory aspect of citizens making proposals and participating in decisions was obstructed in some cases by local civil society associations, since direct citizen participation was seen to be in competition with the associations' roles. Several municipal governments worked on the implementation of Decidim together with local associations, adding features to the software such as different weightings for proposals by individuals versus those by associations. [3]

The use of Decidim and participatory processes was found to depend on electoral results in some cases: these ceased in Badalona after Dolors Sabater lost power as Mayor in June 2018. [3]

Recognition

In 2023, the Decidim software was recognised as satisfying the criteria of the Digital Public Goods Alliance as a digital public good that contributes to the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals. [8]

See also

Related Research Articles

Participatory democracy, participant democracy, participative democracy, or semi-direct democracy is a form of government in which citizens participate individually and directly in political decisions and policies that affect their lives, rather than through elected representatives. Elements of direct and representative democracy are combined in this model.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Public participation (decision making)</span> Extent to which societies encourage the people to share in organizational decision-making

Citizen participation or public participation in social science refers to different mechanisms for the public to express opinions—and ideally exert influence—regarding political, economic, management or other social decisions. Participatory decision-making can take place along any realm of human social activity, including economic, political, management, cultural or familial.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">E-democracy</span> Use of information and communication technology in political and governance processes

E-democracy, also known as digital democracy or Internet democracy, uses information and communication technology (ICT) in political and governance processes. The term is credited to digital activist Steven Clit. By using 21st-century ICT, e-democracy seeks to enhance democracy, including aspects like civic technology and E-government. Proponents argue that by promoting transparency in decision-making processes, e-democracy can empower all citizens to observe and understand the proceedings. Also, if they possess overlooked data, perspectives, or opinions, they can contribute meaningfully. This contribution extends beyond mere informal disconnected debate; it facilitates citizen engagement in the proposal, development, and actual creation of a country's laws. In this way, e-democracy has the potential to incorporate crowdsourced analysis more directly into the policy-making process.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Participatory budgeting</span> Democratic financial decision-making process

Participatory budgeting (PB) is a type of citizen sourcing in which ordinary people decide how to allocate part of a municipal or public budget through a process of democratic deliberation and decision-making. Participatory budgeting allows citizens or residents of a locality to identify, discuss, and prioritize public spending projects, and gives them the power to make real decisions about how money is spent.

Participatory management is the practice of empowering members of a group, such as employees of a company or citizens of a community, to participate in organizational decision making. It is used as an alternative to traditional vertical management structures, which has shown to be less effective as participants are growing less interested in their leader's expectations due to a lack of recognition of the participant's effort or opinion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Citizen media</span> Journalistic content produced by private citizens who are not professional journalists

Citizen media is content produced by private citizens who are not professional journalists. Citizen journalism, participatory media and democratic media are related principles.

Electronic participation (e-participation) refers to the use of ICT in facilitating citizen participation in government-related processes, encompassing areas such as administration, service delivery, decision-making, and policy-making. As such, e-participation shares close ties with e-government and e-governance participation. The term's emergence aligns with the digitization of citizen interests and interactions with political service providers, primarily due to the proliferation of e-government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Participatory planning</span> Decentralized, whole community-based urban design process

Participatory planning is an urban planning paradigm that seeks to involve the community of an area in the urban planning of that area. It's a way for communities to work together to identify and address problems and to create a plan to achieve a desired socio-economic goal. Participatory planning emerged in response to the centralized and rationalistic approaches that defined early urban planning work.

E-petitioner is an online petition system developed in Scotland, characterised by its integration into the processes of representative democracy. It allows citizens to raise and sign a petition, read background information on the issue, and add comments to an online forum associated with each petition.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Free Culture Forum</span>

The Free Culture Forum (FCForum) was an international meeting of relevant organisations and individuals involved in free culture, digital rights and access to knowledge. It took place in Barcelona every annually from 2009 to 2015, jointly with the oXcars, a free culture festival. The oXcars are a non-competitive awards ceremony held at Sala Apolo in Barcelona, Spain, in October each year. They are a public showcase that puts the spotlight on cultural creation and distribution carried out under the paradigms of shared culture. Through presentations and symbolic mentions of works in a series of categories, real legal situations involving free culture are shown using parody.

Telematics Freedom Foundation is a non-profit organization which aims to bring citizens, in the age of telematics, Internet, mobile phones and the web, all those freedoms and rights that the Free Software Movement has already brought to PC users worldwide.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Collaborative e-democracy</span> Political concept of an online, participatory policymaking process

Collaborative e-democracy refers to a hybrid democratic model combining elements of direct democracy, representative democracy, and e-democracy. This concept, first introduced at international academic conferences in 2009, offers a pathway for citizens to directly or indirectly engage in policymaking. Steven Brams and Peter Fishburn describe it as an "innovative way to engage citizens in the democratic process," that potentially makes government "more transparent, accountable, and responsive to the needs of the people."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Simona Levi</span>

Simona Levi is a theatre director, playwright, activist, technopolitical strategist, cultural manager and curator, and lecturer. Born in Italy and with Spanish nationality, she has been living in Barcelona, Spain, since 1990. She is an activist in the field of freedom of expression and information, digital rights, the free flow of culture and knowledge, strategic use of digital tools for collective action, institutional accountability, protection of whistleblowers and the fight against corruption and disinformation. She has also participated in movements in defence of the right to housing and use of public space.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LiquidFeedback</span> Software

LiquidFeedback is free software for political opinion formation and decision making. The software incorporates insights from social choice theory in order to aggregate opinions more effectively.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Major Cities of Europe IT Users Group</span>

The Major Cities of Europe IT Users Group is an independent association of chief information officers, IT managers and department heads of cities. The group was founded in 1982 as a result of an initiative by the Greater London Council. Since then it has focused on innovation in cities, driven by information and communications technology.

Civic technology, or civic tech, enhances the relationship between the people and government with software for communications, decision-making, service delivery, and political process. It includes information and communications technology supporting government with software built by community-led teams of volunteers, nonprofits, consultants, and private companies as well as embedded tech teams working within government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">X Party</span> Political party in Spain

The X Party is a political party officially registered with the Spanish Ministry of Interior. The X Party registered towards the end of 2012, and appeared publicly at the beginning of 2013. It was the first party to be founded by a group of people connected to the 15M movement and other free-culture movements. The party supports a model of democracy that is participatory and monitored by everyday citizens, taking advantage of the political potential of tools available for digital communication.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anti-austerity movement in Spain</span> Protests in Spain that started in 2011

The anti-austerity movement in Spain, also referred to as the 15-M Movement, and the Indignados Movement, was a series of protests, demonstrations, and occupations against austerity policies in Spain that began around the local and regional elections of 2011 and 2012. Beginning on 15 May 2011, many of the subsequent demonstrations spread through various social networks such as Real Democracy NOW and Youth Without a Future.

As of 2015, over 1,500 instances of participatory budgeting (PB) have been implemented across the five continents. While the democratic spirit of PB remains the same throughout the world, institutional variations abound.

Electronic voting in Switzerland started in 2003 in the canton of Geneva, where the residents of Anières cast their vote using the Internet. This was the first trial of e-voting in Switzerland. In the following years, the number of people able to use electronic voting grew as more and more cantons began adopting such a system.

References

  1. "Release 0.29.1". 3 October 2024. Retrieved 21 October 2024.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Xabier E. Barandiaran; Antonio Calleja López; Arnau Monterde; Carol Romero (19 January 2024), Decidim, a Technopolitical Network for Participatory Democracy (PDF), Springer Science+Business Media, doi:10.1007/978-3-031-50784-7, Wikidata   Q128012134, archived (PDF) from the original on 13 June 2024
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Rosa Borge Bravo; Joan Balcells Padullés; Albert Padró-Solanet Grau (4 May 2022). "Democratic disruption or continuity? Analysis of the Decidim Platform in Catalan municipalities" (PDF). American Behavioral Scientist . doi:10.1177/00027642221092798. hdl:10609/144286. ISSN   1552-3381. Wikidata   Q128009236. Archived (PDF) from the original on 29 June 2024.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Eli Borges Junior; Bruno Madureira Ferreira (November 2022). "Informative architectures and citizen participation: a comparative study between the digital platforms". Liinc em Revista. 18: e6058. doi:10.18617/LIINC.V18I2.6058. ISSN   1808-3536. Wikidata   Q128009986. Archived from the original on 22 July 2024.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Aline Suter; Lars Kaiser; Martin Dušek; Florin Hasler; Simone Tappert (16 January 2024). "Digital Rights to the City: Local Practices and Negotiations of Urban Space on Decidim". Urban Planning. 9. doi: 10.17645/UP.7065 . ISSN   2183-7635. Wikidata   Q128010739. Archived from the original on 11 June 2024.
  6. 1 2 Pablo Aragón; Andreas Kaltenbrunner; Antonio Calleja-López; Andrés Pereira; Arnau Monterde; Xabier E. Barandiaran; Vicenç Gómez (20 July 2017), Deliberative Platform Design: The Case Study of the Online Discussions in Decidim Barcelona, International Conference on Social Informatics, Springer Science+Business Media, Wikidata   Q128007080
  7. 1 2 Decidim's Social Contract, Decidim, 2022, Wikidata   Q130220771, archived from the original on 2 September 2024
  8. Axel Thévenet (20 July 2023), Decidim is recognized as a Digital Public Good, Open Source Observatory and Repository, Wikidata   Q131948885, archived from the original on 30 January 2025