Decidim

Last updated
Decidim (sociopolitical network)
Established2016  OOjs UI icon edit-ltr-progressive.svg (8 years ago)
Types organization   OOjs UI icon edit-ltr-progressive.svg
Aim participatory democracy   OOjs UI icon edit-ltr-progressive.svg
Affiliations City Council of Barcelona   OOjs UI icon edit-ltr-progressive.svg
Website decidim.org   OOjs UI icon edit-ltr-progressive.svg
Decidim (software)
Stable release
0.28.2 [1]   OOjs UI icon edit-ltr-progressive.svg / 16 July 2024
Repository
Written in Ruby on Rails
License software: GNU AGPLv3; content: CC BY-SA; data: Open Database License
Website Official website OOjs UI icon edit-ltr-progressive.svg

Decidim describes itself as a "technopolitical network for participatory democracy". [2] It combines a free and open-source software (FOSS) software package together with a participatory political project and an organising community, "Metadecidim". [3] Decidim participants describe the software, political and organising components as "technical", "political" and "technopolitical" levels, respectively. [4] Decidim's aims can be seen as promoting the right to the city, as proposed by Henri Lefebvre. [5] As of 2023, Decidim instances were actively in use for participatory decision-making in municipal and regional governments and by citizens' associations in Spain, Switzerland and elsewhere. [3] [4] Studies of the use of Decidim found that it was effective in some cases, [3] [4] [5] while in one case implemented top-down in Lucerne, it strengthened the digital divide. [5]

Contents

Creation

A server called "Decidim" was created by the 15M anti-austerity movement in Spain in 2016, running a fork of the "Consul" software, [4] when a political party derived from the protest movement obtained political power. [3] In early 2017, the server was switched to a similarly inspired, but new software project, Decidim, completely rewritten, aiming to be more modular and convenient for development by a wide community. [2] :3,104

The name "Decidim" comes from a Catalan word meaning "let's decide" or "we decide". [2] :1

Software

Decidim uses Ruby on Rails. As of 2022, the software defines two structures: "participatory spaces" and "participatory components". [4] The participatory spaces (six as of early 2024 [2] :3) include "processes" (such as a participatory budget), "assemblies" (such as a citizens' association website), "conferences/meetings", "initiatives", and "consultations (voting/elections)". [5] [4] The participatory components (twelve as of early 2024 [2] :3) range from "comments", "proposals", "amendments", "votes" through to "accountability". Together these allow a wide flexibility in creating specific space–component combinations. [4] The "accountability" component is used to monitor whether and how a project is executed. [2] :4

As of 2022, three user levels are defined: general visitors with view-only access; registered users who have several participation rights; and verified users who can participate in decision-making. Users may be individuals or represent associations or working groups within an organisation. Users with special privileges are called "administrators", "moderators" and "collaborators". [4]

As of 2022, four versions of Decidim had been released. [3]

The Decidim software development strategy is intended to be modular and scalable. As FOSS, the software is intended to encourage both citizen and government interaction with each other and with decision-making power over the software itself, aiming at high levels of traceability and transparency. [4]

Decidim software provides an application programming interface (API) for command line access. [6]

Technopolitical project

In the spirit of the Decidim software being free and open-source software (FOSS), a community of software developers, social activists, software consultancies, researchers, and administrative staff from municipal governments called Metadecidim was created for discussing and analysing Decidim experience and development. [3] Metadecidim is seen as an intermediary component between the political level of Decidim, implemented on servers such as Barcelona Decidim, and the technical level of hosting the software source code and bug reporting structures. [4] As of June 2023, Metadecidim had about 5000 registered participants. [2] :90

The Decidim community has a text called the Decidim Social Contract (DSC) that defines six guidelines. The DSC defines the free software licences that may be used for Decidim software; it defines requirements of transparency, traceability and integrity of content hosted by Decidim software; a goal of equal access to all users and democratic quality parameters to measure progress towards equality; [7] data privacy; and it requires inter-institutional cooperation of institutions implementing instances of the software, in order to encourage further development. [5] The free software licensing is the GNU Affero General Public License (AGPL) version 3 for code; the CC BY-SA licence is used for content; and "data" is published under the Open Database License. [2] :4–5 [7]

Philosophically, the aims of Decidim can be seen as promoting the right to the city, as proposed by Henri Lefebvre. [5] Metadecidim's self-description as "technopolitical" is seen as implying that the political implications of designs and choices of software are seen as significant, in opposition to the view that software is "value neutral and objective". [2] :viii Metadecidim sees Decidim as a "recursively democratic infrastructure", in the sense that the software, political and server infrastructure is "both used and democratised by its community, the Metadecidim community". [2] :2

Decidim proponents see the combination of online and offline participation as fundamental: "From its very conception until today, a distinguishing feature of Decidim over other kinds of participatory democracy software ... was that of connecting digital processes directly with public meetings and vice versa." [2] :74

Organisationally, the community formally established Decidim Association in 2019 and City Council of Barcelona gave control of the Decidim trademark and code base to Decidim Association. The effect was to combine public funds with citizens' association control of decision-making. [2] :3

Use of Decidim

In 2022, Borge and colleagues estimated that there were 311 instances running Decidim in Spain and in 19 other countries; [3] while Borges and colleagues estimated that there were Decidim instances run by 80 local and regional governments and 40 citizens' associations in Spain and elsewhere. [4] In 2023, Suter and colleagues cited Decidim's own estimate of 400 city and regional governments and civil society institutions using Decidim. [5] The Open University of Catalonia, the University of Bordeaux and the University of Caen Normandy ran Decidim instances. [2] :27–28

Decidim Barcelona

A Decidim server was run by the City Council of Barcelona for a two-month trial prior to 2017, in which 40,000 citizens discussed their own proposals and proposals made by the council. The Decidim software allowed threaded discussion, labelling whether the initial comment on a proposal was negative, neutral or positive, and notification to participants. [6]

The two-month trial included both online and face-to-face participation. According to Decidim, about 40% of the 39,000 individual participants did so face-to-face, and about 85% of the organisational participants did so face-to-face. There were about 11,000 proposals made on the Decidim server, of which about 8000 were accepted. The execution of the proposals was monitored during the following four years, spending about 90% of the Barcelona City Council's budget for 2016–2019. [2] :24–25

Zurich and Lucerne

In Switzerland, urban development has legal requirements in relation to citizen participation. Use of Decidim in Zurich and Lucerne in 2021 and 2022 was studied by Suter and colleagues, based on documentary evidence, interviews with 15 people in Zurich and 17 in Lucerne ranging from municipality employees through to representatives of neighbourhood associations, and "participatory observations" (informal participatory events observed by the researchers). The researchers found that the effectiveness of Decidim varied significantly between the different cases, and argued that the "full potential" of Decidim had not yet been achieved in Switzerland. [5]

In Wipkingen in Zurich, two local citizens' associations used a server running Decidim to run a participatory budget to spend CHF  40,000. The project, named "Quartieridee", had 99 submissions of proposals and awarded funding to eight proposals. The researchers found that overall implementation was dependent on significant financial resources and citizens' voluntary work; and had difficulties due to the municipality lacking legal procedures for implementing the citizens' chosen projects. [5]

The project was scaled up to the Zurich city level the following year with the name "Stadtidee" and a participatory budget of CHF  540,000. Among the successful projects was a confrontation between a citizens' association, "Linkes Seeufer für Alle" opposed to a Kibag AG in relation to a plot of land owned by Kibag next to Lake Zurich. An effect of the Decidim networking was that citizens legally occupied the plot of land for several days. [5]

In 2021, the LuzernNord area of Lucerne was an area with many migrants and people with low incomes, at risk of gentrification. A top-down use of a Decidim server by the local administration, in which citizens' associations were encouraged to participate, was found by the researchers to strengthen the digital divide rather than overcoming it. Limitation of the language to German and lack of confidence in being able to participate effectively were found to be specific effects opposing the effectiveness of the project. [5]

Other municipalities

Based on nine in-depth interviews with officials responsible for Decidim, conducted in 2018 in some of the initial municipalities that used Decidim, online interviews in March 2019 with officials from 34 municipalities using Decidim, and data from the Decidim servers, the effectiveness of Decidim in terms of transparency, participation in decision-making, and deliberation (discussion of proposals) was studied by Rosa Borge and colleagues. It was found that the officials saw Decidim's role as primarily promoting transparency and the collecting of citizens' proposals, while having only a modest role in transferring decision-making to citizens and a minor role in encouraging online citizen debate. [3]

Several municipalities' use of Decidim provided their first use of participatory budgeting. [3]

The Borge et al. study also found, consistently with other research, that the participatory aspect of citizens making proposals and participating in decisions was obstructed in some cases by local civil society associations, since direct citizen participation was seen to be in competition with the associations' roles. Several municipal governments worked on the implementation of Decidim together with local associations, adding features to the software such as different weightings for proposals by individuals versus those by associations. [3]

The use of Decidim and participatory processes was found to depend on electoral results in some cases: these ceased in Badalona after Dolors Sabater lost power as Mayor in June 2018. [3]

See also

Related Research Articles

Participatory democracy, participant democracy, participative democracy, or semi-direct democracy is a form of government in which citizens participate individually and directly in political decisions and policies that affect their lives, rather than through elected representatives. Elements of direct and representative democracy are combined in this model.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Public participation (decision making)</span> Extent to which societies encourage the people to share in organizational decision-making

Citizen participation or public participation in social science refers to different mechanisms for the public to express opinions—and ideally exert influence—regarding political, economic, management or other social decisions. Participatory decision-making can take place along any realm of human social activity, including economic, political, management, cultural or familial.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">E-democracy</span> Use of information and communication technology in political and governance processes

E-democracy, also known as digital democracy or Internet democracy, uses information and communication technology (ICT) in political and governance processes. The term is credited to digital activist Steven Clift. By using 21st-century ICT, e-democracy seeks to enhance democracy, including aspects like civic technology and E-government. Proponents argue that by promoting transparency in decision-making processes, e-democracy can empower all citizens to observe and understand the proceedings. Also, if they possess overlooked data, perspectives, or opinions, they can contribute meaningfully. This contribution extends beyond mere informal disconnected debate; it facilitates citizen engagement in the proposal, development, and actual creation of a country's laws. In this way, e-democracy has the potential to incorporate crowdsourced analysis more directly into the policy-making process.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Participatory budgeting</span> Democratic financial decision-making process

Participatory budgeting (PB) is a type of citizen sourcing in which ordinary people decide how to allocate part of a municipal or public budget through a process of democratic deliberation and decision-making. Participatory budgeting allows citizens or residents of a locality to identify, discuss, and prioritize public spending projects, and gives them the power to make real decisions about how money is spent.

Online consultations or e-consultations refer to an exchange between government and citizens using the Internet. They are one form of online deliberation. Further, online consultation consists in using the Internet to ask a group of people their opinion on one or more specific topics, allowing for trade-offs between participants. Generally, an agency consults a group of people to get their thoughts on an issue when a project or a policy is being developed or implemented, e.g. to identify or access options, or to evaluate ongoing activities. This enables governments to draft more citizen-centered policy.

Participatory management is the practice of empowering members of a group, such as employees of a company or citizens of a community, to participate in organizational decision making. It is used as an alternative to traditional vertical management structures, which has shown to be less effective as participants are growing less interested in their leader's expectations due to a lack of recognition of the participant's effort or opinion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Citizen media</span> Journalistic content produced by private citizens who are not professional journalists

Citizen media is content produced by private citizens who are not professional journalists. Citizen journalism, participatory media and democratic media are related principles.

Electronic participation (e-participation) refers to the use of ICT in facilitating citizen participation in government-related processes, encompassing areas such as administration, service delivery, decision-making, and policy-making. As such, e-participation shares close ties with e-government and e-governance participation. The term's emergence aligns with the digitization of citizen interests and interactions with political service providers, primarily due to the proliferation of e-government.

Participatory video (PV) is a form of participatory media in which a group or community creates their own film. The idea behind this is that making a video is easy and accessible, and is a great way of bringing people together to explore issues, voice concerns or simply to be creative and tell stories. It is therefore primarily about process, though high quality and accessible films (products) can be created using these methods if that is a desired outcome. This process can be very empowering, enabling a group or community to take their own action to solve their own problems, and also to communicate their needs and ideas to decision-makers and/or other groups and communities. As such, PV can be a highly effective tool to engage and mobilise marginalised people, and to help them to implement their own forms of sustainable development based on local needs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Public consultation</span> Process to get public input

Public consultation, public comment, or simply consultation, is a process by which members of the public are asked for input on public issues. This can occur in public meetings open to all in written form, as well as in deliberative groups. Surveys and deliberative groups can be conducted with self-selected citizens or with statistically representative samples of the population which enables the identification of majority opinion. Its main goals are to improve public involvement and influence, as well as the transparency and efficiency of government projects, laws, or regulations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Liquid democracy</span> Combination of direct and representative democracy

Liquid democracy is a form of Proxy voting, whereby an electorate engages in collective decision-making through direct participation and dynamic representation. This democratic system utilizes elements of both direct and representative democracy. Voters in a liquid democracy have the right to vote directly on all policy issues à la direct democracy; voters also have the option to delegate their votes to someone who will vote on their behalf à la representative democracy. Any individual may be delegated votes and these proxies may in turn delegate their vote as well as any votes they have been delegated by others resulting in "metadelegation".

Telematics Freedom Foundation is a non-profit organization which aims to bring citizens, in the age of telematics, Internet, mobile phones and the web, all those freedoms and rights that the Free Software Movement has already brought to PC users worldwide.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Collaborative e-democracy</span> Political concept of an online, participatory policymaking process

Collaborative e-democracy refers to a hybrid democratic model combining elements of direct democracy, representative democracy, and e-democracy. This concept, first introduced at international academic conferences in 2009, offers a pathway for citizens to directly or indirectly engage in policymaking. Steven Brams and Peter Fishburn describe it as an "innovative way to engage citizens in the democratic process," that potentially makes government "more transparent, accountable, and responsive to the needs of the people."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LiquidFeedback</span> Software

LiquidFeedback is free software for political opinion formation and decision making. The software incorporates insights from social choice theory in order to aggregate opinions more effectively.

Civic technology, or civic tech, enhances the relationship between the people and government with software for communications, decision-making, service delivery, and political process. It includes information and communications technology supporting government with software built by community-led teams of volunteers, nonprofits, consultants, and private companies as well as embedded tech teams working within government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">X Party</span> Political party in Spain

The X Party is a political party officially registered with the Spanish Ministry of Interior. The X Party registered towards the end of 2012, and appeared publicly at the beginning of 2013. It was the first party to be founded by a group of people connected to the 15M Movement and other free culture movements. The party supports a model of democracy that is participatory and monitored by everyday citizens, taking advantage of the political potential of tools available for digital communication.

Online deliberation is a broad term used to describe many forms of non-institutional, institutional and experimental online discussions. The term also describes the emerging field of practice and research related to the design, implementation and study of deliberative processes that rely on the use of electronic information and communications technologies (ICT).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anti-austerity movement in Spain</span> Protests in Spain that started in 2011

The anti-austerity movement in Spain, also referred to as the 15-M Movement, and the Indignados Movement, was a series of protests, demonstrations, and occupations against austerity policies in Spain that began around the local and regional elections of 2011 and 2012. Beginning on 15 May 2011, many of the subsequent demonstrations spread through various social networks such as Real Democracy NOW and Youth Without a Future.

As of 2015, over 1,500 instances of participatory budgeting (PB) have been implemented across the five continents. While the democratic spirit of PB remains the same throughout the world, institutional variations abound.

Electronic voting in Switzerland started in 2003 in the canton of Geneva, where the residents of Anières cast their vote using the Internet. This was the first trial of e-voting in Switzerland. In the following years, the number of people able to use electronic voting grew as more and more cantons began adopting such a system.

References

  1. "Release 0.28.2". 16 July 2024. Retrieved 22 July 2024.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Xabier E. Barandiaran; Antonio Calleja López; Arnau Monterde; Carol Romero (19 January 2024), Decidim, a Technopolitical Network for Participatory Democracy (PDF), Springer Science+Business Media, doi:10.1007/978-3-031-50784-7, Wikidata   Q128012134, archived (PDF) from the original on 13 June 2024
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Rosa Borge Bravo; Joan Balcells Padullés; Albert Padró-Solanet Grau (4 May 2022). "Democratic disruption or continuity? Analysis of the Decidim Platform in Catalan municipalities" (PDF). American Behavioral Scientist . doi:10.1177/00027642221092798. hdl:10609/144286. ISSN   1552-3381. Wikidata   Q128009236. Archived (PDF) from the original on 29 June 2024.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Eli Borges Junior; Bruno Madureira Ferreira (November 2022). "Informative architectures and citizen participation: a comparative study between the digital platforms". Liinc em Revista. 18: e6058. doi:10.18617/LIINC.V18I2.6058. ISSN   1808-3536. Wikidata   Q128009986. Archived from the original on 22 July 2024.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Aline Suter; Lars Kaiser; Martin Dušek; Florin Hasler; Simone Tappert (16 January 2024). "Digital Rights to the City: Local Practices and Negotiations of Urban Space on Decidim". Urban Planning. 9. doi: 10.17645/UP.7065 . ISSN   2183-7635. Wikidata   Q128010739. Archived from the original on 11 June 2024.
  6. 1 2 Pablo Aragón; Andreas Kaltenbrunner; Antonio Calleja-López; Andrés Pereira; Arnau Monterde; Xabier E. Barandiaran; Vicenç Gómez (20 July 2017), Deliberative Platform Design: The Case Study of the Online Discussions in Decidim Barcelona, International Conference on Social Informatics, Springer Science+Business Media, Wikidata   Q128007080
  7. 1 2 Decidim's Social Contract, Decidim, 2022, Wikidata   Q130220771, archived from the original on 2 September 2024