Definitions of Puritanism

Last updated

Historians have produced and worked with a number of definitions of Puritanism, in an unresolved debate on the nature of the Puritan movement of the 16th and 17th century. There are some historians who are prepared to reject the term for historical use. [1] John Spurr argues that changes in the terms of membership of the Church of England, in 1604–6, 1626, 1662, and also 1689, led to re-definitions of the word "Puritan". [2] Basil Hall, citing Richard Baxter considers that "Puritan" dropped out of contemporary usage in 1642, with the outbreak of the First English Civil War, being replaced by more accurate religious terminology. [3] Current literature on Puritanism supports two general points: Puritans were identifiable in terms of their general culture, by contemporaries, which changed over time; and they were not identified by theological views alone.

Contents

To the 1620s

Historians now generally reject the idea that before the 1620s and the influence of Arminianism in the Church of England there were significant differences in doctrine between English Puritans in general, and other English Protestants. Puritans were in practice known as "zealous Calvinists" fond of preaching. [4] For this reason a term sometimes preferred is "Hot Protestantism": i.e. one approach to Puritanism is to regard it simply as Protestant belief, intensely held. [5]

Separatist groups

Numerous, generally small, Calvinist dissenting groups and sects are classified as broad-sense Puritans. These separating Puritans fit more comfortably into the history of denominations than do the bulk of Puritans who remained within the Church of England (non-separating Puritans).

Scripture alone

William Ames provided a self-definition of Puritans via three points, in 1610. [6] Point 3 is sola scriptura .

It has been argued that Puritans adopted the Calvinist regulative principle of worship. The laxer normative principle of worship was characteristic of the Church of England. [7] The Puritans took the side of Calvin and the Zwinglians, against Philip Melanchthon, in this early contentious debate of the Protestant Reformation. [8]

Elizabethan Puritanism

Patrick Collinson states that "puritan" and "papist" were not "taxonomic definitions" in the Elizabethan period. [9]

Jacobean Puritanism and conforming Puritans

The approach taken by King James I led to the absorption of many conforming Puritans into the Church of England of the time. [10] Collinson has discussed a moderate Puritanism, as contrasted to an extreme Puritanism that demanded presbyterianism in church polity. [11] Ferrell argues that conforming Puritanism was at the same time part of a theological consensus, and in terms of church polity a target of the sustained and divisive Jacobean polemical campaign against further reform. [12] These definitions contrast with others, less precise in period, that on the one hand identified Puritans closely with presbyterians, as in Perry Miller, or with the whole gamut of presbyterian and Independent believers. [13]

Francis Bacon criticised Puritans for their over-strict judgements on adiaphora. [14] On the other hand, Hill gives examples of conforming Puritans who did not object to set forms of worship. [15] Towards the end of King James's reign Marco Antonio de Dominis analysed the views of the Church of England and Roman Catholic Church, concluding that, excepting the views of the Puritans, they were at root compatible. He did make a further qualification, about the extreme Calvinism of some of the bishops. [16]

Semi-separatism

The enforcement of a degree of religious uniformity also led to the formation of "semi-separated" clergy. This kind of semi-separatism relied on niches where Puritan clergy could find employment. These niches, however, are not easily classified. [17]

Lay Puritanism

Lay patrons of Puritanism were prominent in the middle years of the reign of Elizabeth I. [18] Godly gentlemen, the so-called Puritan gentry, then became a significant factor in English life and politics. Henry Hastings, 3rd Earl of Huntingdon was a renowned member of the godly nobility. [19]

From the 1620s

After about 1620 there arose clear theological points at issue between English Puritans and other English Protestants. The future colonist Emmanuel Downing wrote to James Ussher in 1620 asking that the king should provide a definition. [20] There were also taxonomies of Puritanism offered. Joseph Mede in 1623 divided Puritans into: (a) ecclesiastical Puritans (the originals); (b) moral Puritans; and (c) political Puritans. [21] Henry Parker in his Discourse Concerning Puritans (1641) distinguished also the religious dogmatic Puritan. [22]

Doctrinal Puritanism

The native English strand of Arminianism defined Calvinism as "doctrinal Puritanism". This view gained some support from King James I of England. [23] Thomas Fuller reported that De Dominis used "Puritan" to mean "anti-Arminian". [24] William Laud took up the topic of doctrinal Puritanism in 1624. [25] Hill's book Society and Puritanism is directed towards the concerns of doctrinal Puritans, and their lay appeal. [26]

Puritan casuistry and Puritan legacy

Hall proposes Puritan casuistry as a "common denominator" of types of Puritan that is of value to historians, and also was inherited by later nonconformists. More specifically, he points to "cases of conscience", and sermons preached on them. The Cripplegate Lectures were one vehicle by which this tradition was passed on. Hall gives also the example of The Practice of Piety, by Lewis Bayly, as representative, and influential on Pietism. [27]

New England Puritanism

The cultural form of Puritanism that was a major influence in the development of New England is admitted by historians to be problematic in its definition. At the time of emigration around 1630 it was no different from English Puritanism in general; by 1650 religious differentiation in New England was quite marked, and the New England branch of Puritanism had also evolved in its distinctive way. In denominational terms New England Puritanism has been identified with early congregationalism. The "New England mind", however, about which Perry Miller wrote in connection with "Puritan culture", has been subject to extensive revisionism, as has earlier work in this field. [28]

Notes

  1. ↑ Crawford Gribben (16 August 2007). God's Irishmen:Theological Debates in Cromwellian Ireland: Theological Debates in Cromwellian Ireland. Oxford University Press. pp. 205 note 52. ISBN   978-0-19-532531-7 . Retrieved 9 November 2012.
  2. ↑ John Spurr (15 October 1998). English Puritanism, 1603-1689. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 4. ISBN   978-0-333-60189-1 . Retrieved 9 November 2012.
  3. ↑ Hall, p. 245.
  4. ↑ J. T. Cliffe, The Puritan Gentry: The Great Puritan Families of Early Stuart England, Routledge & Kegan Paul (1984), p. 2.
  5. ↑ J. Garnett (2 August 2003). Revival and Religion Since 1700: Essays for John Walsh. Continuum International Publishing Group. pp. 202–. ISBN   978-1-85285-093-7 . Retrieved 9 November 2012.
  6. ↑ Keith L. Sprunger (1982). Dutch Puritanism: A History of English and Scottish Churches of the Netherlands in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries. BRILL. p. 458. ISBN   978-90-04-06793-6 . Retrieved 9 November 2012.
  7. ↑ Ligon Duncan; J. Matthew Pinson (1 March 2009). Perspectives on Christian Worship: 5 Views. B&H Publishing Group. p. 9. ISBN   978-0-8054-4099-7 . Retrieved 9 November 2012.
  8. ↑ Alan Richardson; John Stephen Bowden (1983). New Dictionary of Christian Theology. Hymns Ancient & Modern Limited. p. 490. ISBN   978-0-334-02208-4 . Retrieved 9 November 2012.
  9. ↑ Collinson, Patrick. "Elizabeth I". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/8636.(Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
  10. ↑ Daniel W. Doerksen (1997). Conforming to the Word: Herbert, Donne, and the English Church Before Laud. Bucknell University Press. p. 20. ISBN   978-0-8387-5334-7 . Retrieved 9 November 2012.
  11. ↑ Clayton Roberts (1996). Logic of Hist. Explanation - Ppr. Penn State University Press. p. 229. ISBN   978-0-271-01443-2 . Retrieved 10 November 2012.
  12. ↑ Lori Anne Ferrell, Government by Polemic: James I, the King's Preachers, and the Rhetorics of Conformity, 1603-1625, Stanford University Press (1998), p.9.
  13. ↑ Margo Todd (7 November 2002). Christian Humanism and the Puritan Social Order. Cambridge University Press. p. 10 note 25. ISBN   978-0-521-89228-5 . Retrieved 10 November 2012.
  14. ↑ Catherine Gimelli Martin (30 November 2010). Milton Among the Puritans: The Case for Historical Revisionism. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. p. 138. ISBN   978-1-4094-0856-7 . Retrieved 9 November 2012.
  15. ↑ Hill, p. 19.
  16. ↑ Peter Lake; Michael C. Questier (2000). Conformity and Orthodoxy in the English Church, C. 1560-1660. Boydell & Brewer. pp. 168–9. ISBN   978-0-85115-797-9 . Retrieved 9 November 2012.
  17. ↑ John Spurr (15 October 1998). English Puritanism, 1603-1689. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 65. ISBN   978-0-333-60189-1 . Retrieved 9 November 2012.
  18. ↑ Colin Pendrill (30 October 2008). OCR History A, as: Church and State 1529-89. Pearson Education. p. 180. ISBN   978-0-435-31260-2 . Retrieved 9 November 2012.
  19. ↑ Paul E. J. Hammer (24 June 1999). The Polarisation of Elizabethan Politics: The Political Career of Robert Devereux, 2nd Earl of Essex, 1585-1597. Cambridge University Press. p. 31. ISBN   978-0-521-43485-0 . Retrieved 9 November 2012.
  20. ↑ Hill, p. 21.
  21. ↑ Jonathan D. Moore (2007). English Hypothetical Universalism: John Preston and the Softening of Reformed Theology. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. pp. 23 note 91. ISBN   978-0-8028-2057-0 . Retrieved 10 November 2012.
  22. ↑ Michael Mendle (1 November 2003). Henry Parker and the English Civil War: The Political Thought of the Public's 'Privado'. Cambridge University Press. p. 53. ISBN   978-0-521-52131-4 . Retrieved 10 November 2012.
  23. ↑ Matthew Reynolds (2005). Godly Reformers and Their Opponents in Early Modern England: Religion in Norwich C. 1560-1643. Boydell Press. p. 7. ISBN   978-1-84383-149-5 . Retrieved 9 November 2012.
  24. ↑ Hall, pp. 244–5.
  25. ↑ Margo Todd (1995). Reformation to Revolution: Politics and Religion in Early Modern England. Taylor & Francis Group. p. 67. ISBN   978-0-415-09692-8 . Retrieved 9 November 2012.
  26. ↑ Hill, p. 30.
  27. ↑ Hall, p. 254.
  28. ↑ Alden T. Vaughan (1972). ThePuritan Tradition in America: 1620-1730. UPNE. pp. xi–xxvi. ISBN   978-0-87451-852-8 . Retrieved 20 November 2012.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Arminianism</span> Protestant theological movement

Arminianism is a movement of Protestantism initiated in the early 17th century, based on the theological ideas of the Dutch Reformed theologian Jacobus Arminius and his historic supporters known as Remonstrants. Dutch Arminianism was originally articulated in the Remonstrance (1610), a theological statement submitted to the States General of the Netherlands. This expressed an attempt to moderate the doctrines of Calvinism related to its interpretation of predestination.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Reformed Christianity</span> Protestant denominational family

Reformed Christianity, also called Calvinism, is a major branch of Protestantism that began during the sixteenth-century Protestant Reformation, a schism in the Western Church. Today, it is largely represented by the Continental, Presbyterian, and Congregational traditions, as well as parts of the Anglican and Baptist traditions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Puritans</span> Subclass of English Reformed Protestants

The Puritans were English Protestants in the 16th and 17th centuries who sought to rid the Church of England of what they considered to be Roman Catholic practices, maintaining that the Church of England had not been fully reformed and should become more Protestant. Puritanism played a significant role in English and early American history, especially during the Protectorate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Owen (theologian)</span> English theologian (1616–1683)

John Owen was an English Puritan Nonconformist church leader, theologian, and academic administrator at the University of Oxford. One of the most prominent theologians in England during his lifetime, Owen was a prolific author who wrote articles, treatises, Biblical commentaries, poetry, children's catechisms, and other works. Many of Owen's works reflect his Calvinist interpretation of Scripture. Owen is still widely read by Calvinists today, and is known particularly for his writings on sin and human depravity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Synergism</span> Christian theology concerning the will in salvation

In Christian theology, synergism is the belief that salvation involves some form of cooperation between divine grace and human freedom. Synergism is upheld by the Catholic Church, Eastern Orthodox Churches, Oriental Orthodox Churches, Anabaptist Churches and Methodist Churches. It is an integral part of Arminian theology common in the General Baptist and Methodist traditions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elizabethan Religious Settlement</span> Part of Englands switch to Protestantism

The Elizabethan Religious Settlement is the name given to the religious and political arrangements made for England during the reign of Elizabeth I (1558–1603). The settlement, implemented from 1559 to 1563, marked the end of the English Reformation. It permanently shaped the Church of England's doctrine and liturgy, laying the foundation for the unique identity of Anglicanism.

Via media is a Latin phrase meaning "the middle road" or the "way between two extremes".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Richard Sibbes</span>

Richard Sibbes (1577–1635) was an Anglican theologian. He is known as a Biblical exegete, and as a representative, with William Perkins and John Preston, of what has been called "main-line" Puritanism because he always remained in the Church of England and worshiped according to the Book of Common Prayer.

The Articles of Religion are an official doctrinal statement of Methodism—particularly American Methodism and its offshoots. John Wesley abridged the Thirty-nine Articles of the Church of England, removing the Calvinistic parts among others, reflecting Wesley's Arminian theology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of the Calvinist–Arminian debate</span> Christian theological debate

The history of the Calvinist–Arminian debate begins in early 17th century in the Netherlands with a Christian theological dispute between the followers of John Calvin and Jacobus Arminius, and continues today among some Protestants, particularly evangelicals. The debate centers around soteriology, or the study of salvation, and includes disputes about total depravity, predestination, and atonement. While the debate was given its Calvinist–Arminian form in the 17th century, issues central to the debate have been discussed in Christianity in some form since Augustine of Hippo's disputes with the Pelagians in the 5th century.

The Lambeth Articles of 1595 were a series of nine doctrinal statements intended to be an appendix to the Thirty-nine Articles of the Church of England. In response to a controversy over the Calvinist doctrine of predestination, the Lambeth Articles were created to clarify the church's official teaching. Because Queen Elizabeth I refused to authorise the articles, they never went into effect in England. However, they were adopted by the Church of Ireland in 1615.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">James VI and I and religious issues</span>

James VI and I, King of Scotland, King of England and King of Ireland, faced many complicated religious challenges during his reigns in Scotland and England.

Baptist beliefs are not completely consistent from one church to another, as Baptists do not have a central governing authority. However, Baptists do hold some common beliefs among almost all Baptist churches.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Laudianism</span> Early seventeenth-century English reform movement

Laudianism was an early seventeenth-century reform movement within the Church of England, promulgated by Archbishop William Laud and his supporters. It rejected the predestination upheld by the previously dominant Calvinism in favour of free will, and hence the possibility of salvation for all men. Laudianism had a significant impact on the Anglican high church movement and its emphasis on liturgical ceremony and clerical hierarchy. Laudianism was the culmination of the move towards Arminianism in the Church of England, but was neither purely theological in nature, nor restricted to the English church.

Patrick "Pat" Collinson, was an English historian, known as a writer on the Elizabethan era, particularly Elizabethan Puritanism. He was emeritus Regius Professor of Modern History, University of Cambridge, having occupied the chair from 1988 to 1996. He once described himself as "an early modernist with a prime interest in the history of England in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Protestantism</span> Major branch of Christianity

Protestantism is a branch of Christianity that emphasizes justification by God through faith alone, the teaching that salvation comes by unmerited divine grace, the priesthood of all believers, and the Bible as the sole infallible source of authority for Christian faith and practice. The five solae summarize the basic theological beliefs of mainstream Protestantism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of the Puritans under King James I</span> Puritan protestant history 1603–1625

The reign of King James I of England (1603–1625) saw the continued rise of the Puritan movement in England, that began during reign of Queen Elizabeth (1558–1603), and the continued clash with the authorities of the Church of England. This eventually led to the further alienation of Anglicans and Puritans from one another in the 17th century during the reign of King Charles I (1625–1649), that eventually brought about the English Civil War (1642–1651), the brief rule of the Puritan Lord Protector of England Oliver Cromwell (1653–1658), the English Commonwealth (1649–1660), and as a result the political, religious, and civil liberty that is celebrated today in all English speaking countries.

The Westminster Conference of 1559 was a religious disputation held early in the reign of Elizabeth I of England. Although the proceedings themselves were perfunctory, the outcome shaped the Elizabethan religious settlement and resulted in the authorisation of the 1559 Book of Common Prayer.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Arminianism in the Church of England</span>

Arminianism was a controversial theological position within the Church of England particularly evident in the second quarter of the 17th century. A key element was the rejection of predestination. The Puritans fought against Arminianism, and King James I of England opposed it before, during, and after the Synod of Dort, 1618–1619, where the English delegates participated in formulating the Calvinist Canons of Dort, but his son Charles I, favoured it, leading to deep political battles. The Methodists, who espoused a variant of the school of thought called Wesleyan–Arminian theology, branched off the Church of England in the 18th century.

The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to Protestantism:

References

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.