Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994

Last updated
Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994
Great Seal of the United States (obverse).svg
Long titleA bill to amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to establish standards with respect to dietary supplements, and for other purposes.
Acronyms (colloquial)DSHEA
Enacted bythe 103rd United States Congress
EffectiveOctober 25, 1994
Citations
Public law 103-417
Statutes at Large 108  Stat.   4325
Codification
Acts amended Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
Titles amended 21 U.S.C.: Food and Drugs
U.S.C. sections amended
Legislative history
  • Introduced in the Senate as S. 784 by Orrin G. Hatch (R–UT) on April 7, 1993
  • Committee consideration by Committee on Labor and Human Resources and Committee on Energy and Commerce
  • Passed the Senate on August 13, 1994 (pass voice vote)
  • Passed the House on October 7, 1994 (pass without objection)
  • Senate agreed to amendment on October 8, 1994 (agreed voice vote)
  • Signed into law by President Bill Clinton on October 25, 1994

The Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 ("DSHEA"), is a 1994 statute of United States Federal legislation which defines and regulates dietary supplements. [1] Under the act, supplements are regulated by the FDA for Good Manufacturing Practices under 21 CFR Part 111. [2] The act was intended to exempt the dietary and herbal supplement industry from most FDA drug regulations, allowing them to be sold and marketed without scientific backing for their health and medical claims. [3]

Contents

Background

In the late 1980s and early 1990s, the American Congress was evaluating several bills which would have increased the powers of the FDA. One of these acts, the Nutrition Advertising Coordination Act of 1991 would have tightened the regulations regarding supplement labeling. In response to the proposed bill, many health food companies began lobbying the government to vote down the laws and told the public that the FDA would ban dietary supplements. [4] A notable advertisement [5] featured the actor Mel Gibson being raided and arrested by FDA agents because he was taking vitamin C supplements. [6] Gerald Kessler, chief executive of Nature Plus, a dietary supplement manufacturer and one of the leaders of the lobbying effort, accused the FDA of having "a bias against the supplement industry for 50 years." [6]

Senator Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) and Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) introduced the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act in 1994. On October 25, 1994, President Bill Clinton signed the Act into law, saying that "After several years of intense efforts, manufacturers, experts in nutrition, and legislators, acting in a conscientious alliance with consumers at the grassroots level, have moved successfully to bring common sense to the treatment of dietary supplements under regulation and law." [7]

Hatch had significant financial support from supplement manufacturers, including multi-level marketing firms XanGo and Herbalife. [3]

Definition of supplement

DSHEA defines the term "dietary supplement" to mean a product (other than tobacco) intended to supplement the diet that bears or contains one or more dietary ingredients, including a vitamin, a mineral, a herb or other botanical, an amino acid, a dietary substance for use by human to supplement the diet by increasing the total dietary intake, or a concentrate, metabolite, constituent, extract, or combination of any of the aforementioned ingredients. [8] Furthermore, a dietary supplement must be labeled as a dietary supplement and be intended for ingestion and must not be represented for use as conventional food or as a sole item of a meal or of the diet. [8] In addition, a dietary supplement cannot be approved or authorized for investigation as a new drug, antibiotic, or biologic, unless it was marketed as a food or a dietary supplement before such approval or authorization. [8] Under DSHEA, dietary supplements are deemed to be food, except for purposes of the drug definition. [8]

Dietary supplement labels

A "label" is a display of written, printed, or graphic material on the supplement container. DSHEA and other federal regulations require the following information to appear on dietary supplement labels: [8]

Regulatory review

Under the act, supplement manufacturers do not need to receive FDA approval before marketing dietary supplements that were marketed in the United States before 1994. [9] Dietary ingredients not so grandfathered are defined as New Dietary Ingredients in 21 U.S.C. 350b(d), [10] and notifications of providing reasonable evidence of their safety, or reasonable expectations of their safety, must be reviewed (not approved) by the FDA prior to their marketing. The FDA is not authorized to approve dietary supplements for safety and effectiveness. [11] The herbal supplement industry has criticized these regulations as unfairly stringent; some feel they undermine the original intentions of the law to afford the herbal supplement industry freedom to market supplements as food. [12]

Reception

Some research has noted that there is scarce safety information available to the public about dietary supplements on the market. [13] Other research has shown that the FDA has an insufficient network in the dietary supplement marketplace for responding to reports of adverse events. [14] A bill to require tracking of illnesses related to supplement use was blocked in 2010 by Senator Hatch. [15]

Supplement manufacturers have generally welcomed the act, saying that the act protects consumers' rights to readily have access to supplements, regardless of if they are proven to work. [16] National Health Freedom Action calls DSHEA a "foundational cornerstone of health freedom in our country." [17]

Criticism

The act has been widely criticised. Steven Novella has said that

The deal that DSHEA and NCCAM made with the public was this: Let the supplement industry have free reign[ sic ] to market untested products with unsupported claims, and then we’ll fund reliable studies to arm the public with scientific information so they can make good decisions for themselves. This "experiment" (really just a gift to the supplement industry) has been a dismal failure. The result has been an explosion of the supplement industry flooding the marketplace with useless products and false claims. [18]

The act has also been criticised because supplement manufacturers are not required to demonstrate supplements' safety before marketing the supplements. The FDA can only ban a supplement if the FDA finds proof that the supplement is dangerous. This means that unsafe or ineffective supplements can be sold freely, while the FDA has only a limited capacity to monitor adverse reactions from supplements. [19] [20] David Kessler, commissioner of the FDA when DSHEA was approved, has stated that

The 1994 Dietary Supplement Act does not require that dietary supplements (defined broadly to include many substances, such as herbs and amino acids, that have no nutritive value) be shown to be safe or effective before they are marketed. The FDA does not scrutinize a dietary supplement before it enters the marketplace. The agency is permitted to restrict a substance if it poses a 'significant and unreasonable risk' under the conditions of use on the label or as commonly consumed ... Congress has shown little interest in protecting consumers from the hazards of dietary supplements, let alone from the fraudulent claims that are made, since its members apparently believe that few of these products place people in real danger. Nor does the public understand how potentially dangerous these products can be. [21]

Critics also claim that many supplements are unsafe and unnatural, while many members of the public believe that supplements are natural as well as healthier and more effective than drugs. [22] DSHEA has also been criticised for being an industry-driven bill, that the bill is made for the supplement industry, a multibillion-dollar industry, and not for consumers. [15]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Food and Drug Administration</span> United States federal agency

The United States Food and Drug Administration is a federal agency of the Department of Health and Human Services. The FDA is responsible for protecting and promoting public health through the control and supervision of food safety, tobacco products, caffeine products, dietary supplements, prescription and over-the-counter pharmaceutical drugs (medications), vaccines, biopharmaceuticals, blood transfusions, medical devices, electromagnetic radiation emitting devices (ERED), cosmetics, animal foods & feed and veterinary products.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dietary supplement</span> Product providing additional nutrients

A dietary supplement is a manufactured product intended to supplement a person's diet by taking a pill, capsule, tablet, powder, or liquid. A supplement can provide nutrients either extracted from food sources, or that are synthetic. The classes of nutrient compounds in supplements include vitamins, minerals, fiber, fatty acids, and amino acids. Dietary supplements can also contain substances that have not been confirmed as being essential to life, and so are not nutrients per se, but are marketed as having a beneficial biological effect, such as plant pigments or polyphenols. Animals can also be a source of supplement ingredients, such as collagen from chickens or fish for example. These are also sold individually and in combination, and may be combined with nutrient ingredients. The European Commission has also established harmonized rules to help insure that food supplements are safe and appropriately labeled.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ephedra (medicine)</span> Medicinal preparation from the plant Ephedra sinica

Ephedra is a medicinal preparation from the plant Ephedra sinica. Several additional species belonging to the genus Ephedra have traditionally been used for a variety of medicinal purposes, and are a possible candidate for the soma plant of Indo-Iranian religion. It has been used in traditional Chinese medicine, in which it is referred to as Ma Huang, for more than 2,000 years. Native Americans and Mormon pioneers drank a tea brewed from other Ephedra species, called "Mormon tea" and "Indian tea".

A health claim on a food label and in food marketing is a claim by a manufacturer of food products that their food will reduce the risk of developing a disease or condition. For example, it is claimed by the manufacturers of oat cereals that oat bran can reduce cholesterol, which will lower the chances of developing serious heart conditions. Vague health claims include that the food inside is "healthy," "organic," "low fat," "non-GMO," "no sugar added," or "natural".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Herbal medicine</span> Study and use of supposed medicinal properties of plants

Herbal medicine is the study of pharmacognosy and the use of medicinal plants, which are a basis of traditional medicine. With worldwide research into pharmacology, some herbal medicines have been translated into modern remedies, such as the anti-malarial group of drugs called artemisinin isolated from Artemisia annua, a herb that was known in Chinese medicine to treat fever. There is limited scientific evidence for the safety and efficacy of many plants used in 21st-century herbalism, which generally does not provide standards for purity or dosage. The scope of herbal medicine sometimes include fungal and bee products, as well as minerals, shells and certain animal parts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nootropic</span> Compound intended to improve cognitive function

Nootropics, colloquially brain supplements, smart drugs and cognitive enhancers, are natural, semisynthetic or synthetic compounds which purportedly improve cognitive functions, such as executive functions, attention or memory.

Nutraceutical is a marketing term used to imply a pharmaceutical effect from a compound or food product that has not been scientifically confirmed or approved to have clinical benefits. In the United States, nutraceuticals are considered and regulated as a subset of foods by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938</span> Acts of the United States Congress

The United States Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act is a set of laws passed by the United States Congress in 1938 giving authority to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to oversee the safety of food, drugs, medical devices, and cosmetics. The FDA's principal representative with members of congress during its drafting was Charles W. Crawford. A principal author of this law was Royal S. Copeland, a three-term U.S. senator from New York. In 1968, the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions were added to the FD&C. Also in that year the FDA formed the Drug Efficacy Study Implementation (DESI) to incorporate into FD&C regulations the recommendations from a National Academy of Sciences investigation of effectiveness of previously marketed drugs. The act has been amended many times, most recently to add requirements about bioterrorism preparations.

The health freedom movement is a libertarian coalition that opposes regulation of health practices and advocates for increased access to "non-traditional" health care.

Hydroxycut is a brand of dietary supplements that is marketed as a weight loss aid. Hydroxycut was originally developed and manufactured by MuscleTech Research and Development; MuscleTech was sold to Iovate Health Sciences in 2003–2004 and declared bankruptcy in 2005; Iovate continues to use MuscleTech as a brand to market Hydroxycut.

The Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition is the branch of the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that regulates food, dietary supplements, and cosmetics, as opposed to drugs, biologics, medical devices, and radiological products, which also fall under the purview of the FDA.

ConsumerLab.com, LLC. is a privately held American company registered in White Plains, NY. It is a publisher of test results on health, wellness, and nutrition products. Consumer Labs is not a laboratory, but contracts studies to outside testing laboratories. It purchases dietary supplement products and other consumer goods directly from public storefronts and online retailers, contracts for testing by private laboratories, and publishes reports based on the results. It primarily derives revenue from the sale of subscriptions to its online publications, which are paywalled. Other sources of revenue include a proprietary certification program, licensing fees, contents re-publication license fees, and advertising.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990</span> US law

The Nutrition Labeling and Education Act (NLEA) is a 1990 United States Federal law. It was signed into law on November 8, 1990 by President George H. W. Bush.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Regulation of food and dietary supplements by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration</span> Governmental regulation of food quality

The regulation of food and dietary supplements by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is a process governed by various statutes enacted by the United States Congress and interpreted by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ("FDA"). Pursuant to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and accompanying legislation, the FDA has authority to oversee the quality of substances sold as food in the United States, and to monitor claims made in the labeling about both the composition and the health benefits of foods.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sulfoaildenafil</span> Chemical compound

Sulfoaildenafil (thioaildenafil) is a synthetic drug that is a structural analog of sildenafil (Viagra). It was first reported in 2005, and it is not approved by any health regulation agency. Like sildenafil, sulfoaildenafil is a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor.

The PubMed Dietary Supplement Subset (PMDSS) is a joint project between the National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Library of Medicine (NLM) and the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements (ODS). PMDSS is designed to help people search for academic journal articles related to dietary supplement literature. The subset was created using a search strategy that includes terms provided by the Office of Dietary Supplements, and selected journals indexed for PubMed that include significant dietary supplement related content. It succeeds the International Bibliographic Information on Dietary Supplements (IBIDS) database, 1999–2010, which was a collaboration between the Office of Dietary Supplements and the U.S. Department of Agriculture's National Agricultural Library.

The Council for Responsible Nutrition (CRN) is a Washington D.C.-based trade association and lobbying group representing more than 180 companies that manufacture dietary ingredients and supplements, or supply services to those suppliers and manufacturers. CRN's current president and CEO is Steve M. Mister.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Botanical drug</span> Plant ingredients marketed for treatment of a disease

A botanical drug is defined in the United States Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act as a botanical product that is marketed as diagnosing, mitigating, treating, or curing a disease; a botanical product in turn, is a finished, labeled product that contains ingredients from plants. Chemicals that are purified from plants, like paclitaxel, and highly purified products of industrial fermentation, like biopharmaceuticals, are not considered to be botanical products.

Consumer Health Laws are laws that ensure that health products are safe and effective and that health professionals are competent; that government agencies enforce the laws and keep the public informed; professional, voluntary, and business organizations that serve as consumer advocates, monitor government agencies that issue safety regulations, and provide trustworthy information about health products and services; education of the consumer to permit freedom of choice based on an understanding of scientific data rather than misleading information; action by individuals to register complaints when they have been deceived, misled, overcharged, or victimized by frauds.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">The Proxmire Amendment</span> US legislation related to dietary supplements

The Proxmire Amendments were a series of legislation that prohibited the Food and Drug Administration from monitoring and limiting the potency of vitamins and minerals found in dietary supplements. The Proxmire Amendment also made it so that food supplements could not be classified as drugs, making their sale possible without a prescription from a doctor. According to a study done, "dietary supplements fall into the following categories: vitamins, minerals, herbs or other botanicals, amino acids, animal-derived products, hormones and hormone analogues, enzymes, and concentrates, metabolites, constituents, or extracts of these." They can be used by anyone wishing to purchase them as much or as little as they desire. Dietary supplements can be used to increase productivity, treat illness, help mental health such as depression and anxiety, enhancing mental abilities, building muscle, or losing weight, among many other uses. William Proxmire, a Senator for Wisconsin, was instrumental in influencing the passing the Proxmire Amendment. The Proxmire Amendment is also known as The Rogers-Proxmire Amendment of 1976, and The Vitamins and Minerals Amendments. This amendment became section 411 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.

References

  1. ↑ "Six versions of Bill Number S.784 for the 103rd Congress". THOMAS.gov. Archived from the original on 2013-03-31. Retrieved 2013-04-02.
  2. ↑ "Dietary Supplements". FDA Office of Dietary Supplement Programs. Retrieved 30 January 2017.
  3. 1 2 Hiltzik, Michael (2018-01-05). "Column: Orrin Hatch is leaving the Senate, but his deadliest law will live on". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 2022-10-12.
  4. ↑ New York Times. 1998. "Unregulated Dietary Supplements."
  5. ↑ "Mel Gibson expresses americans to take vitamins as we see fit" – via www.youtube.com.
  6. 1 2 Molotsky, Irvin. 1993. "U.S. Issues Rules on Diet Supplement Labels." New York Times.
  7. ↑ "Chapter I - Dietary Supplement Health And Education Act of 1994". www.health.gov. Archived from the original on 2018-11-28. Retrieved 2014-02-21.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Janet Rehnquist (March 2003), Department of Health and Human Services - Office of the Inspector General - Dietary Supplement Labels: Key Elements (PDF), United States Department of Health and Human Services, OEI-01-01-00120, retrieved 2 April 2013
  9. ↑ FDA. "Dietary Supplements."
  10. ↑ FDA.gov - New Dietary Ingredients in Dietary Supplements - Background for Industry
  11. ↑ Commissioner, Office of the (2022-05-09). "Is It Really 'FDA Approved'?". FDA.
  12. ↑ FDA Draft Guidance on New Dietary Ingredients for the Dietary Supplement Industry Archived 2016-03-04 at the Wayback Machine
  13. ↑ Abdel-Rahman, A.; Anyangwe, N.; Carlacci, L.; Casper, S.; Danam, R. P.; Enongene, E.; Erives, G.; Fabricant, D.; Gudi, R.; Hilmas, C. J.; Hines, F.; Howard, P.; Levy, D.; Lin, Y.; Moore, R. J.; Pfeiler, E.; Thurmond, T. S.; Turujman, S.; Walker, N. J. (2011). "The Safety and Regulation of Natural Products Used as Foods and Food Ingredients". Toxicological Sciences. 123 (2): 333–348. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfr198 . PMID   21821733.
  14. ↑ Frankos, V. H.; Street, D. A.; O'Neill, R. K. (2009). "FDA Regulation of Dietary Supplements and Requirements Regarding Adverse Event Reporting". Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 87 (2): 239–244. doi:10.1038/clpt.2009.263. PMID   20032973. S2CID   205121580.
  15. 1 2 David Gorski (a.k.a. Orac) (8 March 2010). ""Big supplement" lashes out, and John McCain caves in".
  16. ↑ Alliance for Natural Health- USA. "Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA)."
  17. ↑ National Health Freedom Action. "Protect DSHEA!" Archived 2013-10-25 at the Wayback Machine
  18. ↑ Novella, Steven. 2013. "Herbs are Drugs." Skeptical Inquirer.
  19. ↑ Loxton, Daniel (2007). "The Immortal Lily The Pink: The 100th anniversary of the FDA marks a milestone in medicine before which cranks and charlatans ran amok". Skeptic.
  20. ↑ "Dietary Supplements and Safety". The New York Times. 2013-12-26.
  21. ↑ Barrett, Stephen (2007). "How the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 Weakened the FDA". Quackwatch.
  22. ↑ Skerrett, Patrick. 2012. "FDA needs stronger rules to ensure the safety of dietary supplements." Harvard University Health Blog.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.