Donald L. Horowitz

Last updated

Donald L. Horowitz (born 1939) is James B. Duke Professor of Law and Political Science Emeritus at Duke Law School and Duke University in Durham, North Carolina, United States.

With law degrees from Syracuse and Harvard Universities, Donald Horowitz earned his Ph.D. in Political Science from Harvard. Most of his work has concerned ethnic conflict and accommodation in severely divided societies, based on a combination of extensive field research and wide knowledge of the phenomena in multiple countries, beginning with a long series of stays in Malaysia immediately after his Ph.D. studies. He has also published widely on legal and constitutional processes.


Horowitz is the author of Coup Theories and Officers’Motives: Sri Lankain Comparative Perspective (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980); Ethnic Groups in Conflict (University of California Press, 1985, 2000),[1] A Democratic South Africa? ConstitutionalEngineering in a Divided Society (California, 1991), which won the Ralph Bunche Prize of the American Political Science Association; The Deadly Ethnic Riot (California, 2001); and Constitutional Change and Democracy in Indonesia (Cambridge University Press, 2013), a study of that country’s process of democratization and extensive constitutional reform, which was issued in a Bahasa Indonesia translation in 2014.


Writing about Ethnic Groups in Conflict, Ashutosh Varshney states that it “was a seminal text. For the first time in scholarly history, a book on ethnic conflict covered a whole variety of topics, ranging from concepts and definitions to those spheres of institutional politics (party politics, military politics, affirmative action) in which the power of ethnicity had become obvious and could no longer be ignored.”[2] The book’s analyses have been influential on many aspects of ethnic politics, from its use of social identity theory to explain certain parts of conflict behavior, to its careful discussion of “coup proofing” by civilian leaders of ethnically divided polities, to its analysis of ethnically-based political parties and coalitions. The sections on coalitions informed Horowitz’s discussion of interethnic vote pooling and moderation, and his critique of consociationalism.


Before his appointment at Duke, Horowitz had appointments at the Harvard Center for International Affairs, the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, the Smithsonian Institution, and the Brookings Institution. He also served as a law clerk to a federal judge and as an appellate lawyer representing the US government. His two books on the legal process, The Jurocracy:Government Lawyers, Agency Programs, and Judicial Decisions (D.C. Heath, 1977) and The Courts and Social Policy (Brookings, 1977), reflect his interest in legal decision making and in bringing social science to bear in studying it. The latter book won the Louis Brownlow Award of the National Academy of Public Administration.


Horowitz’s most recent books expand on several themes of his previous work. Constitutional Processes and Democratic Commitment (Yale University Press, 2021) makes an argument for constitution making through deliberation designed to produce consensus decisions, an argument he supports with evidence of the superior quality of deliberation found in consensus processes for constitution making and for other processes. Of this book, Jon Elster said on the back jacket that it proposed “a compelling framework for the study of constitutional processes more generally.” The author, he added, “shows himself to be informed as well as wise. If constitution-makers are equally wise, they can benefit greatly from this book.” Another book that deals with both politics and law concerns Federalism, RegionalAutonomy, and Ethnic Conflict: Politics and Law. Currently in press, it focuses on the potential benefits of regional devolution for ethnic accommodation, the fear of secession that in many countries inhibits the realization of these benefits, and the conflicts that often occur within devolved units, reducing the benefits of devolution at those levels.


Horowitz has acted as a consultant on institutions to reduce ethnic conflict in several countries. His advocacy of centripetal methods of coping with conflict through electoral and other institutions to foster political moderation has won support from quite a few scholars and in the practice of some politicians in plural societies. Nevertheless, consociation remains the more widely adopted method of formal interethnic power sharing and the one with more scholarly adherents. Horowitz is working on a book-length study of the problems of ethnic power sharing and constitutional design for severely divided societies.


Horowitz has lectured at universities around the world and been a visiting professor at the University of Chicago Law School and the Central European University, as well as a Centennial Professor at the London School of Economics. He has been a visiting fellow at Wolfson College Cambridge), Nuffield College (Oxford), the University of Canterbury Law Faculty in New Zealand, Universiti Kebangsaan in Malaysia, the National University of Singapore (in Political Science and later in Asian Legal Studies), and in the Academic Icon program at the University of Malaya. A former Guggenheim Scholar and Carnegie Scholar, he has twice been a fellow at the Woodrow Wilson Center, a Senior Fellow at the U.S. Institute of Peace, and a Siemens Prize Fellow at the American Academy in Berlin.


In 2009, Horowitz was presented with the Distinguished Scholar Award of the Ethnicity, Nationalism, and Migration Section of the International Studies Association. In 2011, he was awarded an honorary doctoral degree by the Flemish-speaking Free University of Brussels. Elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 1993, Horowitz served as President of the American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy from 2007 to 2010.


[1] Lijphart, Arend (10 November 1985). “Ties of blood, rivers of blood” (https://www.ny times.com/1985/11/10/books/ties-of-blood-rivers-of-blood.html). New York Times. Retrieved 17 March 2016.


[2] Varshney, Ashutosh (2007), “Ethnicity and Ethnic Conflict.” In Boix, Carlos; Stokes, Susan C. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics. Oxford University Press, pp. 274-294. ISBN 978-0199278480.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ethnic conflict</span> Conflict between ethnic groups

An ethnic conflict is a conflict between two or more ethnic groups. While the source of the conflict may be political, social, economic or religious, the individuals in conflict must expressly fight for their ethnic group's position within society. This criterion differentiates ethnic conflict from other forms of struggle.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ronald Dworkin</span> American legal philosopher (1931–2013)

Ronald Myles Dworkin was an American legal philosopher, jurist, and scholar of United States constitutional law. At the time of his death, he was Frank Henry Sommer Professor of Law and Philosophy at New York University and Professor of Jurisprudence at University College London. Dworkin had taught previously at Yale Law School and the University of Oxford, where he was the Professor of Jurisprudence, successor to philosopher H.L.A. Hart.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ashutosh Mukherjee</span> Bengali educator, jurist, barrister and mathematician (1864-1924)

Sir Ashutosh Mukherjee was a prolific Bengali educator, jurist, barrister and mathematician. He was the first student to be awarded a dual degree from Calcutta University. Perhaps the most emphatic figure of Indian education, he was a man of great personality, high self-respect, courage and towering administrative ability. The second Indian Vice-Chancellor of the University of Calcutta for four consecutive two-year terms (1906–1914) and a fifth two-year term (1921–23), Mukherjee was responsible for the foundation of the Bengal Technical Institute in 1906, which was later known as Jadavpur University and the University College of Science of the Calcutta University in 1914.

Consociationalism is a form of democratic power sharing. Political scientists define a consociational state as one which has major internal divisions along ethnic, religious, or linguistic lines, but which remains stable due to consultation among the elites of these groups. Consociational states are often contrasted with states with majoritarian electoral systems.

An ethnocracy is a type of political structure in which the state apparatus is controlled by a dominant ethnic group to further its interests, power, dominance, and resources. Ethnocratic regimes in the modern era typically display a 'thin' democratic façade covering a more profound ethnic structure, in which ethnicity – and not citizenship – is the key to securing power and resources.

Peter Berkowitz is an American political scientist and legal scholar. He served as the Director of Policy Planning at the United States Department of State. He currently serves as the Tad and Dianne Taube Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution of Stanford University.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Neelan Tiruchelvam</span> Sri Lankan lawyer and politician (1944–1999)

Neelakandan Tiruchelvam, PC was a Sri Lankan Tamil lawyer, academic, human rights activist and politician. He was a Member of Parliament and Director of the International Centre for Ethnic Studies. He advocated for a peaceful resolution to the Sri Lankan Civil War and is considered one of the most influential researchers on constitutional law and constitutional theory in Sri Lanka.

Walter K. Andersen is an American academic known for his studies of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) – a Hindu nationalist organization. He currently serves as Senior Adjunct Professor of South Asia Studies at Johns Hopkins University Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies and is a part of the faculty of Tongji University, Shanghai (China). Previously, he taught comparative politics at the College of Wooster before joining the United States State Department as a political analyst for South Asia specializing in India and Indian Ocean affairs. Additionally, he was an adjunct professor at The American University in Washington, D.C.

Saïd Amir Arjomand is an Iranian-American scholar and Distinguished Service Professor of Sociology at Stony Brook University, Long Island, and Director of the Stony Brook Institute for Global Studies. He received his Ph.D. in 1980 from the University of Chicago.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Indiana University Maurer School of Law</span> Law school in Bloomington, Indiana, U.S.

The Indiana University Maurer School of Law is located on the campus of Indiana University in Bloomington, Indiana. The school is named after Michael S. "Mickey" Maurer, an Indianapolis businessman and 1967 alumnus who donated $35 million in 2008. From its founding in 1842 until Maurer's donation, the school was known as the Indiana University School of Law – Bloomington.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Political violence</span> Violence conducted with political goals

Political violence is violence which is perpetrated in order to achieve political goals. It can include violence which is used by a state against other states (war), violence which is used by a state against civilians and non-state actors, and violence which is used by violent non-state actors against states and civilians. It can also describe politically motivated violence which is used by violent non-state actors against a state or it can describe violence which is used against other non-state actors and/or civilians. Non-action on the part of a government can also be characterized as a form of political violence, such as refusing to alleviate famine or otherwise denying resources to politically identifiable groups within their territory.

Myron Weiner was an American political scientist and renowned scholar of India, South Asia, internal and international migration, ethnic conflict, child labor, democratization, political demography, and the politics and policies of developing countries.

The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to politics and political science:

Ashutosh Varshney is an Indian-born political scientist and academic. He is currently the Sol Goldman Professor of International Studies and the Social Sciences and Professor of Political Science at Brown University, where he also directs the Saxena Center for Contemporary South Asia at the Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs. Varshney previously taught at Harvard University and the University of Michigan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Definitions of pogrom</span> History and meaning of the term

This article provides a list of definitions of the term pogrom. The term originated as a loanword from the Russian verb громи́ть, meaning "to destroy, to wreak havoc, to demolish violently". The events in Odessa during Holy Week in 1871 were the first to be widely called a "pogrom" in Russian, and the events of 1881–82 introduced the term into common usage throughout the world.

Groupism is a theoretical approach in sociology that posits that conformity to the laws/norms of a group such as family, kinship, race, ethnicity, religion and nationality brings reciprocal benefits such as recognition, right, power and security. It is the principle that a person's primary or prioritised identity is that of membership in a social network. Groupists assume that individuals in a group tend to have stronger affinity and obligation to a particular group when the influence of an authority figure brings a common goal. The concept of groupism can be defined and criticized in varied ways for disciplines such as sociology, social psychology, anthropology, political history and philosophy. Group-ism is defined in most dictionaries as the behavior of a member of a group where they think and act as the group norm at the expense of individualism. The term originated around mid 19th century and the first known use of the word recorded was in 1851. It is a general definition often used in Indian English as the tendency to form factions in a system setting. The term had also been used for “the principles or practices of Oxford Group movement” which is now historical and rare.

Lucius Jefferson Barker was an American political scientist. He was the Edna Fischel Gellhorn Professor and chair of the political science department at Washington University in St. Louis, and then the William Bennett Munro Professor of Political Science at Stanford University. He was an influential scholar of constitutional law and civil liberties, as well as race and ethnic politics in the United States. He published works on civil liberties in the United States and systemic racism. He was also involved with several presidential campaigns, and he wrote books about the Jesse Jackson 1984 presidential campaign, for which he was a convention delegate.

Ran Hirschl is a political scientist and comparative legal scholar. He is the David R. Cameron Distinguished Professor of Law and Politics at the University of Toronto. Previously, he held the Canada Research Chair in Constitutionalism, Democracy and Development at the University of Toronto. He is the author of several major books and over one hundred and fifty articles on constitutional law and its intersection with comparative politics and society. In 2014, he was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada. In 2021, he was awarded the Stein Rokkan Prize for Comparative Social Science Research for his book City, State: Constitutionalism and the Megacity.

Centripetalism, sometimes called integrationism, is a form of democratic power sharing for divided societies which aims to encourage the parties towards moderate and compromising policies and to reinforce the center of divided political spectrum. As a theory, centripetalism developed out of the criticism of consociationalism by Donald L. Horowitz. Both models aim to provide institutional prescriptions for divided societies. While consociationalism aims to give inclusion and representation to each ethnic group, centripetalism aims to depoliticize ethnicity and to encourage the establishment of multi-ethnic parties.

Nicola McEwen, FRSE is professor of territorial politics at the University of Edinburgh, co-director of the Centre on Constitutional Change, and senior fellow at the UK in a Changing Europe. She became a Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh in 2021. She leads research on devolution and inter-institutional relations. She provides advice to governments and public bodies and gives media expert perspectives internationally. McEwen's research and insights are sought for public engagement and political or business briefings during major events like the 2014 Scottish Independence Referendum, and the Smith Commission, UK BREXIT and recent elections such as to the Scottish Parliament. She has a reputation for being authoritative and trustworthy in engaging with senior politicians, civil service and civic society and has regular media engagements on various topics. McEwen is consulted on aspects such as potential impact on welfare of Scottish independence, or informing parliament on the impact of BREXIT on intra-UK relations and communicating her findings and explanations to public media.

References