Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act

Last updated

Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act
Seal of Michigan.svg
Michigan Legislature
  • Public Act 453 of 1976
Territorial extent Michigan
Enacted by Michigan Legislature
Signed byMichigan Governor William Milliken
SignedJanuary 13, 1977
Effective March 31, 1977
Introduced by Daisy Elliott and Melvin L. Larsen
Amended by
Act 162 of 1977, Act 153 of 1978, Act 446 of 1978, Act 610 of 1978, Act 91 of 1979, Act 93 of 1980, Act 170 of 1980, Act 202 of 1980, Act 45 of 1982, Act 512 of 1982, Act 11 of 1991, Act 70 of 1992, Act 124 of 1992, Act 258 of 1992, Act 216 of 1993, Act 88 of 1995, Act 202 of 1999, Act 348 of 2006, Act 190 of 2009 and Acts 6, 31 and 45 of 2023 [1]
Summary
An Act to define civil rights; to prohibit discriminatory practices, policies, and customs in the exercise of those rights based upon religion, race, color, national origin, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, height, weight, familial status, or marital status; to preserve the confidentiality of records regarding arrest, detention, or other disposition in which a conviction does not result; to prescribe the powers and duties of the civil rights commission and the department of civil rights; to provide remedies and penalties; to provide for fees; and to repeal certain acts and parts of acts. [2]
Keywords
Civil rights, discrimination, housing, employment, public accommodations
Status: In force

The Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act (ELCRA), or Public Act 453 of 1976, which went into effect in 1977, originally prohibited discrimination in Michigan only on the basis of "religion, race, color, national origin, age, sex, height, weight, familial status, or marital status" in employment, housing, education, and access to public accommodations. [2] A ruling by the Michigan Supreme Court on July 28, 2022 expanded the scope of the law to explicitly include protections for LGBT people. [3] Sexual orientation and gender identity were both formally codified and added to Michigan legislation officially on March 16, 2023 and became Act 6 of 2023. [4] Other classes added to the law since passage include pregnant workers, workers who seek abortions, and hair style and texture.

Contents

The law is named for its two primary sponsors, Daisy Elliott, a Democrat from Detroit, and Melvin L. Larsen, a Republican from Oxford, and passed in 1976 with 25 votes in the Michigan Senate and 79 votes in the Michigan House of Representatives. [5] It was signed into law by Michigan Governor William Milliken on January 13, 1977 [6] and went into effect on March 31, 1977. [2]

The law also helped strengthen the role of the Michigan Department of Civil Rights, [7] formed in 1965 to support the work of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission of the 1963 Constitution of Michigan.

History

The Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act was passed in 1976, [5] signed into law by Michigan Governor William Milliken on January 13, 1977, [6] and went into effect on March 31, 1977. [2] It has been amended directly or indirectly over 20 times. [2]

Prior protections

In 1885, Michigan adopted the Public Act 130 of 1885, otherwise known as the Civil Rights Act, which stated “all persons within the jurisdiction of (the state) shall be entitled to full and equal accommodations, advantages, facilities, and privileges of inns, restaurants, eating-houses, barber shops, public conveyances on land and water, theatres, and all other places of public accommodation and amusement”. [5] [6] [8] In 1890, the Michigan Supreme Court in Ferguson v. Gies relied on the Civil Rights Act in holding the “separate but equal” doctrine unconstitutional under Michigan law, over 60 years before the Supreme Court of the United States case of Brown v. Board of Education . In 1927, the Civil Rights Act survived constitutional challenge in Bolden v. Grand Rapids Operating Corporation . [6]

In the years following Bolden v. Grand Rapids Operating Corporation, Michigan passed additional civil rights laws prohibiting discrimination in public accommodations, housing, and employment. The progression of the state’s laws reached a new pinnacle when civil rights were given constitutional status in Michigan's Constitution of 1963, which also resulted in the formation of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission. [6]

Passage

After attempting in 1966 to pass a Michigan version of the federal civil rights law that was adopted in 1964, Michigan State Representative Daisy Elliott was told by the leadership of her political party, the Democrats, that her measure would never pass unless she found a Republican to co-sponsor it. After being newly elected, Michigan State Representative Melvin L. Larsen, a Republican from Oxford, indicated in 1973 that he would co-sponsor the law. Larsen served on the Michigan House of Representatives civil rights committee that would hold hearings and vote on the proposed legislation. Larsen has stated that his Catholic faith and experience as a principal, athletic director, football coach and instructor at one of the Pontiac Catholic schools was what motivated him to support anti-discrimination measures. [9]

The act was modeled on prior state civil rights laws prohibiting discrimination in public accommodations, employment, and housing but considerably extended the reach of their application and broadened the forms of discrimination prohibited. [6]

When proposed by Elliott and Larsen in 1973, the legislation faced opposition from the disabled (referred to as "handicappers" at the time) and LGBT communities because it did not include protections for members of those communities. Elliott and Larsen indicated that the legislation was meant to focus on the African American community. [5] [9] When the bill passed three years later, it was believed that adding "sexual orientation" would prevent the bill from passing, so it was left out. Elliott and Larsen made the decision to proceed with the final bill after Elliott offered to add Larsen's name to the bill and consulted him on the final effort to pass the bill in 1976. [9] Most issues raised by the disabled community were also addressed in 1976 with the passage of the Michigan’s Persons with Disabilities Civil Rights Act. [6]

It passed with 25 votes in the Michigan Senate and 79 votes in the Michigan House of Representatives, [5] and was signed into law by Governor William Milliken on January 13, 1977. [6] The law went into effect on March 31, 1977. [2]

Effort to add protections for LGBTQ people

As early as the 1973 committee hearing on the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act, members of the LGBT community in Michigan sought to be included in the law. [5] [9] In 1983, Republican state representative Jim Dressel co-sponsored House Bill 5000, which would have added "sexual orientation" to the list of protected characteristics; [10] Dressel – who later came out as gay – was defeated for re-election the following year. Michigan's first openly LGBTQ state legislator, Chris Kolb, included such a change in two other pro-LGBT bills [11] —none of which passed. [12]

Since then, a number of additional bills have been introduced to add protections for the LGBTQ community. [5] Most recently, bills to add sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression — Senate Bill 4 and House Bill 4003 — were introduced on Jan. 12, 2023 by State Senator Jeremy Moss and State Representative Laurie Pohutsky, respectively. [13] [14] Moss is the first out gay Senator in Michigan history and Pohutsky is the first out bisexual woman to serve in the Michigan legislature. The issue is one of six legislative priorities for 2023 that were unveiled by Democrats in the House, Senate and Governor's Office. [15] The bill was passed out of the legislature by the House on March 8, [16] and was signed into law by Governor Gretchen Whitmer on March 16. [17]

Although Democrats have introduced legislation amending ELCRA for many consecutive years, the last time there was significant movement — even so much as a hearing — on any bill was 2014. Then-State Representative Sam Singh, a Democrat, had introduced legislation that was inclusive of both sexual orientation and gender identity. Another bill which only included sexual orientation was introduced by Republican State Representative Frank Foster, but did not receive support from the LGBTQ community or progressives, as the bill left out members of the transgender community and did not adequately protect lesbian, gay, or bisexual people from discrimination. [18] Both bills received a hearing before the Michigan House Commerce Committee, but neither bill received a committee vote. [19]

The Michigan Supreme Court, citing the Supreme Court of the United States' decision in Bostock v. Clayton County, ruled in Rouch World, LLC. v. Department of Civil Rights that discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity "necessarily constitutes discrimination because of sex" under ELCRA. [3] This ruling extended the protections of the act to members of the LGBTQ+ community. The decision was codified by the passage of Act 6 of 2023 on March 16, 2023, which will take effect on March 31, 2024 or 91 days after sine die. [20]

Other amendments

The Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act has been amended directly or indirectly nearly 20 times [2] to refine the law, its enforcement, and add protections for groups or classifications not originally named in the act such as height and weight. In 2009, Governor Jennifer Granholm signed Public Act 190 of 2009, an amendment that increased employment protections for pregnant workers. In 2023, Whitmer signed an amendment extending the act to protect those who choose to have abortions from employment retaliation. [21]

In 2019 and subsequent sessions, legislation was introduced to add protections against discrimination on the basis of hair style and texture. [22] The legislation, also known as the Michigan CROWN Act, was passed by the legislature on June 8, 2023 [23] and signed into law on June 15. [24]

Honors and recognition

The State Bar of Michigan recognized the law at the 37th Legal Milestone dedication on August 28, 2012, at the Michigan State Capitol in Lansing. [5]

On June 30, 2020, the Lewis Cass Building in Lansing was renamed the Elliott-Larsen Building in honor of the law's sponsors. [25]

See also

Related Research Articles

This is a list of notable events in the history of LGBT rights that took place in the year 2005.

This is a list of notable events in the history of LGBT rights that took place in the year 2007.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Michigan</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Michigan enjoy the same rights as non-LGBTQ people. Michigan in June 2024 was ranked "the most welcoming U.S. state for LGBT individuals". Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Michigan under the U.S. Supreme Court case Lawrence v. Texas, although the state legislature has not repealed its sodomy law. Same-sex marriage was legalised in accordance with 2015's Obergefell v. Hodges decision. Discrimination on the basis of both sexual orientation and gender identity is unlawful since July 2022, was re-affirmed by the Michigan Supreme Court - under and by a 1976 statewide law, that explicitly bans discrimination "on the basis of sex". The Michigan Civil Rights Commission have also ensured that members of the LGBT community are not discriminated against and are protected in the eyes of the law since 2018 and also legally upheld by the Michigan Supreme Court in 2022. In March 2023, a bill passed the Michigan Legislature by a majority vote - to formally codify both "sexual orientation and gender identity" anti-discrimination protections embedded within Michigan legislation. Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer signed the bill on March 16, 2023. In 2024, Michigan repealed “the last ban on commercial surrogacy within the US” - for individuals and couples and reformed the parentage laws, that acknowledges same sex couples and their families with children.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Delaware</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Delaware enjoy the same legal protections as non-LGBTQ people. Same-sex sexual activity has been legal in Delaware since January 1, 1973. On January 1, 2012, civil unions became available to same-sex couples, granting them the "rights, benefits, protections, and responsibilities" of married persons. Delaware legalized same-sex marriage on July 1, 2013.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in New Jersey</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of New Jersey have the same legal rights as non-LGBTQ people. LGBT individuals in New Jersey enjoy strong protections from discrimination, and have had the same marriage rights as heterosexual people since October 21, 2013.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in California</span>

California is seen as one of the most liberal states in the U.S. in regard to lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) rights, which have received nationwide recognition since the 1970s. Same-sex sexual activity has been legal in the state since 1976. Discrimination protections regarding sexual orientation and gender identity or expression were adopted statewide in 2003. Transgender people are also permitted to change their legal gender on official documents without any medical interventions, and mental health providers are prohibited from engaging in conversion therapy on minors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Hawaii</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Hawaii enjoy the same rights as non-LGBTQ people. Same-sex sexual activity has been legal since 1973; Hawaii being one of the first six states to legalize it. In 1993, a ruling by the Hawaiʻi Supreme Court made Hawaii the first state to consider legalizing same-sex marriage. Following the approval of the Hawaii Marriage Equality Act in November 2013, same-sex couples have been allowed to marry on the islands. Additionally, Hawaii law prohibits discrimination on the basis of both sexual orientation and gender identity, and the use of conversion therapy on minors has been banned since July 2018. Gay and lesbian couples enjoy the same rights, benefits and treatment as opposite-sex couples, including the right to marry and adopt.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Pennsylvania</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Pennsylvania enjoy most of the same rights as non-LGBTQ people. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Pennsylvania. Same-sex couples and families headed by same-sex couples are eligible for all of the protections available to opposite-sex married couples. Pennsylvania was the final Mid-Atlantic state without same-sex marriage, indeed lacking any form of same-sex recognition law until its statutory ban was overturned on May 20, 2014.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in New Mexico</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of New Mexico enjoy the same rights as non-LGBTQ people. New Mexico has seen prominent advances in gay and lesbian rights in recent decades. Same-sex sexual activity has been legal since 1975. Same-sex marriage is legal statewide in New Mexico, as is adoption and access to fertility treatments for lesbian couples. Same-sex couples have had the same rights as heterosexual married couples since 2013. Discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity is banned statewide in the areas of employment, housing and public accommodations. Additionally, conversion therapy on minors is prohibited in the state.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in North Dakota</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of North Dakota may face some legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in North Dakota, and same-sex couples and families headed by same-sex couples are eligible for all of the protections available to opposite-sex married couples; same-sex marriage has been legal since June 2015 as a result of Obergefell v. Hodges. State statutes do not address discrimination on account of sexual orientation or gender identity; however, the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County established that employment discrimination against LGBTQ people is illegal under federal law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in South Carolina</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of South Carolina may face some legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in South Carolina as a result of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Lawrence v. Texas, although the state legislature has not repealed its sodomy laws. Same-sex couples and families headed by same-sex couples are eligible for all of the protections available to opposite-sex married couples. However, discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity is not banned statewide.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Kentucky</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Kentucky still face some legal challenges not experienced by other people. Same-sex sexual activity in Kentucky has been legally permitted since 1992, although the state legislature has not repealed its sodomy statute for same-sex couples. Same-sex marriage is legal in Kentucky under the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges. The decision, which struck down Kentucky's statutory and constitutional bans on same-sex marriages and all other same-sex marriage bans elsewhere in the country, was handed down on June 26, 2015.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Idaho</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Idaho face some legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBTQ people. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Idaho, and same-sex marriage has been legal in the state since October 2014. State statutes do not address discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity; however, the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County established that employment discrimination against LGBTQ people is illegal under federal law. A number of cities and counties provide further protections, namely in housing and public accommodations. A 2019 Public Religion Research Institute opinion poll showed that 71% of Idahoans supported anti-discrimination legislation protecting LGBTQ people, and a 2016 survey by the same pollster found majority support for same-sex marriage.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Alaska</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) rights in the U.S. state of Alaska have evolved significantly over the years. Since 1980, same-sex sexual conduct has been allowed, and same-sex couples can marry since October 2014. The state offers few legal protections against discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity, leaving LGBTQ people vulnerable to discrimination in housing and public accommodations; however, the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County established that employment discrimination against LGBTQ people is illegal under federal law. In addition, four Alaskan cities, Anchorage, Juneau, Sitka and Ketchikan, representing about 46% of the state population, have passed discrimination protections for housing and public accommodations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT employment discrimination in the United States</span>

LGBT employment discrimination in the United States is illegal under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity is encompassed by the law's prohibition of employment discrimination on the basis of sex. Prior to the landmark cases Bostock v. Clayton County and R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (2020), employment protections for LGBT people were patchwork; several states and localities explicitly prohibit harassment and bias in employment decisions on the basis of sexual orientation and/or gender identity, although some only cover public employees. Prior to the Bostock decision, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) interpreted Title VII to cover LGBT employees; the EEOC determined that transgender employees were protected under Title VII in 2012, and extended the protection to encompass sexual orientation in 2015.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in the United States Virgin Islands</span>

In the U.S. Virgin Islands, Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) rights have evolved substantially in recent years. Same-sex sexual activity has been legal since 1985. The region also provides explicit legal protections against discrimination for LGBTQ residents since December 2022. Following the Supreme Court's ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges on June 26, 2015, which found the denial of marriage rights to same-sex couples unconstitutional, same-sex marriage became legal in the islands.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lee Chatfield</span> American politician from Michigan (born 1988)

Lee Roberson Chatfield is an American former politician and a Republican former member of the Michigan House of Representatives. He was first elected from the 107th House district in 2015. He was speaker pro tempore from 2017 to 2019, and speaker of the Michigan House of Representatives from 2019 to 2021. In April 2024 he was charged with thirteen felony counts of embezzlement, larceny and conspiracy involving spending private foundation and state money for personal use while he was Speaker of the Michigan House.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">102nd Michigan Legislature</span> Legislature in Michigan, USA (began 2023)

The 102nd Michigan Legislature, consisting of the Michigan Senate and the Michigan House of Representatives, began its first session on January 1, 2023, which ended on November 14, 2023. A second session is set to begin on January 1, 2024.

Utah Senate Bill 296 is a law passed by the Utah State Legislature and signed into law by Governor Gary Herbert in 2015. SB 296 amended the 1997 Utah Antidiscrimination Act to add sexual orientation and gender identity as protected classes under state law when it comes to housing and employment. The law was described by various news outlets and commentators as the "Utah Compromise".

References

  1. ↑ "Michigan SB0004 | 2023-2024 | 102nd Legislature".
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 "Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act: Public Act 453 of 1976" (PDF). Legislative Council, State of Michigan. Retrieved December 8, 2014.
  3. 1 2 "Rouch World-OP" (PDF). Michigan Supreme Court. July 28, 2022. Retrieved July 28, 2022.
  4. ↑ Stebbins, Laina G. (March 17, 2023). "Whitmer signs LGBTQ+ non-discrimination bill into law alongside civil rights pioneer Mel Larsen". Michigan Advance. Retrieved March 17, 2023.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Gubbins, Roberta M. (September 17, 2012). "Legal Milestone Honors Elliot-Larsen Civil Rights Act". Oakland County Legal News. Retrieved December 8, 2014.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Bowron, Aaron K. (August 2012). "The Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act: Celebrating the Progress of Michigan's Civil Rights Laws" (PDF). Michigan Bar Journal. 91 (8): 20–21.
  7. ↑ Proxmire, Crystal A. (September 26, 2014). "50Years of MDCR #4: Mel Larsen...LGBT Protection..." Oakland County 115. Retrieved December 9, 2014.
  8. ↑ Civil Rights Act (130). 1885. Retrieved December 8, 2014.
  9. 1 2 3 4 Skubick, Tim (November 23, 2014). "Who is Elliott and Who is Larsen? Groundbreakers, That's Who". MLive. Booth Newspapers . Retrieved December 9, 2014.
  10. ↑ Lindstrom, John (March 2013). "Remembering A Pioneering Moment In Gay Rights In The Legislature". Gongwer Michigan. Retrieved December 7, 2015.
  11. ↑ Wolfe, Dawn (February 24, 2005). "Pro-LGBT Bills to Be Introduced, Kolb Seeking Co-Sponsors". Between The Lines . Livonia, MI. Retrieved December 9, 2014.
  12. ↑ Miller, Justin (February 14, 2006). "Once Promising, Kolb's LGBT Bills Fizzle". The Michigan Daily . University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Retrieved December 9, 2014.
  13. ↑ "Senate Bill 0004 (2023)". Michigan Legislature. Retrieved January 30, 2023.
  14. ↑ "House Bill 4003 (2023)". Michigan Legislature. Retrieved January 30, 2023.
  15. ↑ "Speaker, Senate Majority Leader Make Priorities Known with First Bills". Michigan Senate Democrats. January 11, 2023. Retrieved January 30, 2023.
  16. ↑ "Michigan House passes bill to protect LGBTQ rights in Elliot-Larsen Civil Rights Act". WXYZ 7 Action News Detroit. March 8, 2023. Retrieved March 16, 2023.
  17. ↑ "Protections for LGBTQ Michiganders are cemented into state law with Whitmer's pen". mlive. March 16, 2023. Retrieved March 16, 2023.
  18. ↑ Brydum, Sunnivie (November 12, 2014). "Could Michigan Pass a Gay-Only Nondiscrimination Bill?". The Advocate . Retrieved December 9, 2014.
  19. ↑ Oosting, Jonathan (December 3, 2014). "'Historic' Gay Rights Hearing Ends Without Vote on Michigan Anti-Discrimination Proposals". MLive. Booth Newspapers. Retrieved December 9, 2014.
  20. ↑ Stebbins, Laina G. (March 17, 2023). "Whitmer signs LGBTQ+ non-discrimination bill into law alongside civil rights pioneer Mel Larsen". Michigan Advance. Retrieved March 17, 2023.
  21. ↑ "Michigan protects workers from retaliation for having an abortion". AP NEWS. May 17, 2023. Retrieved May 30, 2023.
  22. ↑ Burr, Alyssa (February 21, 2023). "Banning natural hair discrimination in Michigan gets renewed push from Black lawmakers". mlive. Retrieved March 9, 2023.
  23. ↑ Coleman, Ken (June 9, 2023). "Michigan House passes bill banning hair discrimination; legislation heads to Whitmer's desk". Michigan Advance. Retrieved June 13, 2023.
  24. ↑ Jordan, Ta'Niyah; Holleman, Krystle (June 15, 2023). "Gov. Whitmer signs 'CROWN Act' prohibiting hair discrimination in the workplace". WILX. Retrieved June 15, 2023.
  25. ↑ "Michigan Executive Order 2020-139 Naming the "Elliott-Larsen Building"" (PDF). June 30, 2020. Retrieved July 14, 2020.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.