Fiction theory

Last updated
The #BookTok section of Barnes & Noble in Los Angeles (2022). Booktok section, Barnes & Nobel, The Grove, Hollywood, Los Angeles, California, USA.jpg
The #BookTok section of Barnes & Noble in Los Angeles (2022).

Fiction theory (also referred to as Fictionality theory) is a discipline that applies a form of possible world theory to literature. Drawing on concepts found in related theories and psychological ideas such as Parasocial interaction (PSI) and Fictionalism, theorists of fiction study the relationships between perceived textual worlds and reality outside the text. Thus, the primary principle of fiction theory is that the relationships between the speculative nature of fiction and the actual world in which we live are complicated. This further suggests that perceived truths born out of fiction worlds develop a sense of coherency in which they maintain a sense of realism. [1] As a result, this theory offers alternate ways of exploring and asking questions about relations between the fictitious and the actual world.

Contents

Fundamentals of fiction theory

Fiction theory acts simultaneously in both fields of literary analysis and psychology. It suggests that the perception of the actual, such as the world around us, is formulated on individual understanding. Further, fiction theory functions on the extension of this perception to the non-factual, wherein the understanding of the make-believe can translate to the factual. [2] Such is the reason that literature may be understood as a text that is self-consciously artistic and relatable, rather than solely a medium through which to convey information, like a newspaper article.

Fiction theory is typically recognized through parasocial interactions between readers and fictional characters. Most often these connections are formulated through self-identification, wherein people empathize and/or identify with the object of fiction. [3] Oftentimes these connections present themselves in an individual's sense of friendship, or romantic attraction with the fictional. This also can appear as literal self-identification in which the reader feels as though the character reflects their traits. There has been heavy criticism of this aspect of the theory, as there is disagreement regarding whether this self-identification is a delusion. Fiction theory has garnered some popularity as TikTok continues to have millions join the #BookTok movement which often highlights relationships between the real and the fictive. [4]

Psychology of the actual and the fictive

Fathali M. Moghaddam leads the discussion about fictional and psychological interaction, claiming that novels have a bearing on psychological discussions and discourse, thus they should be incorporated into wider topics of the mind. [5] With that, he separates this interaction into three distinct levels at which these disciplines coincide. [6]

  1. Data within.
  2. Understanding of the text (i.e.: literary analysis).
  3. Equality, wherein they allow for an equal interaction between real and fictional universes.

The understanding of fiction theory lies within the third principle which relies on the schema of the individual to mentally conceptualize the story in which they are attempting to understand. [1] This process subconsciously weaves reality into fiction, wherein the awareness of the consumed content becomes something not entirely fictional, nor factually true. Furthermore, this schema is responsible for the prediction of story and character arcs, as our understandings of human behaviors guide our literary comprehension.

The story world model is a commonly used method of explaining fiction theory. [1] In short, this model relies on reader logic that certain things can choose to be inconsequential or simply not exist in a story opposite of reality. For example, the presence of technology. However, despite accepting some narrative truths this model too, relies on the reasoning that the fictional (on some level) functions like that of the real. In theory, identifying the story's logic allows readers to move quickly and with a heightened understanding that would otherwise make literary comprehension laborious. [1]

Roman Jakobson and linguistics

French literary critic Roland Barthes, pictured in the Swedish daily Dagens Nyheter (1969). Roland Barthes 1969.jpg
French literary critic Roland Barthes, pictured in the Swedish daily Dagens Nyheter (1969).
Jakobson's Six Functions of Language as displayed visually. This model refers to verbal communicative function. Roma jakobson theory.png
Jakobson's Six Functions of Language as displayed visually. This model refers to verbal communicative function.

Roman Jakobson was one of the most celebrated linguists of the early-to-mid twentieth century, developing the system of structural linguistics. Further, he developed linguistic systems that perpetuated the discussion of viewing art as a mode of communication that is intentionally aesthetic. Jakobson then further applied linguistics to analyses of literary texts. In his communication model, Jakobson divides a communicative act between an addressor and addressee into parts functioning independently of one another: message, code, context, and contact. [7] According to Jakobson's model, art is created when the message itself (which carries the poetic function) is stressed. This model functions in conjunction with Roland Barthes who designed a system of five major codes (S/Z) that function as tools to analyze narrative texts in ways that move beyond examinations of plot and structure. Resulting in the transference of text into a fully developed narrative that has effects beyond the literal. [8] Both offer a way to explore the nature of a literary work through the application of semiotics generating responses outside the text.

Structuralism

Structuralism, founded and pioneered by both Ferdinand de Saussure and Jakobson, is a system of semiotics by which we can identify the underlying significance of linguistic practices. [9] [10] Saussure's earliest models of this are rooted in the "systemic, relational, arbitrary [and] social" principals of language, wherein the formal purpose is intended to be underscored in favor of the wider purpose that it serves. [9] The purpose of linguistic structuralism was to understand the underlying structures that dictate all forms of language, whether they appear in narrative, prose, script, or screenwriting. By identifying these structures, philosophers sought to reveal the common principles that make different linguistic forms coherent and meaningful. [10] Thus, the idea of structuralism relates to fiction theory by providing tools to analyze the underlying structures that shape narratives. It shifts the focus from content to conventions that produce meaning, offering a systematic and rational approach to understanding how fiction works.

Bakhtin and the Dialogic

Mikhail M. Bakhtin is known for his theories of the self through dialogue, which asserts that knowledge and experience are gained through interaction with the surrounding world. [2] [11] Bakhtin, in his career, emphasized the effect of linguistic environment (through literature and the actual) on the perception of the individual. He also noted that internal dialogue and reflection are a part of this system and evidentiary of the self-sufficient thought process that linguistic interaction creates. [2]

Bakhtin famously criticized Fyodor Dostoevsky for generating characters within his literary works that lacked authentic interactions, thus maintaining "artificial" creations. [12] He accredited this to an inundation of authorial interjection, which made the reading difficult for audiences to connect with as they could not relate with the experiences and perceptions of the fictional. [2]

Kermode to Doležel

Frank Kermode, author of The Sense of an Ending: Studies in the Theory of Fiction, was among the first to argue the importance of literary works in a multidisciplinary sense, more specifically the impact that they have on the human perception of time. [13] Kermode emphasizes the endmost interpretation of existence as derived from humans' constant yearning for an ultimate end which, in turn, has affected storytelling over the centuries. In his book, he distinguishes between fiction and myth, posing the latter as something exploitative while fiction is meant to connect with reality meaningfully. [13] Fiction consists of stories all individuals create about their lives to keep on living in a world that makes few guarantees and is full of inexplicable phenomena. This is built upon by Lubomír Doležel, author of Heterocosmica: Fiction and Possible Worlds, who addresses possible world theory, positing that works of fiction are one of the many ways that humans can consider the theoretical world that could have been. [14] Doležel explains the internalized logic of the fictive, giving bearing to the world and characters within. He then shifts into an ontological and epistemological approach wherein he relates these works of fiction to reality, and how storytelling can further impact our perception of narrative understanding. [14]

Alternate views

Actualism

American philosopher and logician, Saul Kripke. Kripke.JPG
American philosopher and logician, Saul Kripke.

Saul Kripke, a leading analytic philosopher, frames actualism as something that acknowledges the existence of the possible while maintaining its autonomy from that of the actual world. [15] Kripke employs possible word theory to further assert that we utilize the possibilia, possible things, to conceptualize the concrete, but that does not prove the position of the fictional within the actual. [15] Actualism also contends that identifying and judging things through the possible is "methodologically" the starting part of all human conceptualization. [15] Actualism, in Kripke's context, is the direct refusal of possibilism which resembles fiction theory in its acceptance of the non-concrete.

Peter F. Alward, a Canadian professor of philosophy, criticizes "anti-realist" views of fiction attributing the success of such theories to fictional creationism. [16] Fictional creationism is the principle that the entities of the possible should be regarded as realistic creations because of they bear on the reader or observer. [16] Alward further asserts that the reference to the non-real or the possible is not to be considered real, or having any bearing in reality. He describes this process as an innate understanding that humans have about distinguishing what is literally had (and thus tangible) or what type of qualities one could potentially possess. [16]

Separation of purpose

Thomas Pavel, a literary critic, argues that the fictional world deserves to be examined on its terms rather than as a vehicle for the real. His thesis in Fictional Worlds is a critique of structuralism by its insistence on the idea that narrativity limits the possibility of imitating reality. [17] Pavel differs from fellow fiction theorists because he separates literature from its referential relationship to the actual world. He asserts that fictional worlds instead demand tremendous respect for their ability to serve as powerful tools of knowledge for studies within literary disciplines. [17]

Further reading

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Structuralism</span> Theory of culture and methodology

Structuralism is an intellectual current and methodological approach, primarily in the social sciences, that interprets elements of human culture by way of their relationship to a broader system. It works to uncover the structural patterns that underlie all the things that humans do, think, perceive, and feel.

Literary theory is the systematic study of the nature of literature and of the methods for literary analysis. Since the 19th century, literary scholarship includes literary theory and considerations of intellectual history, moral philosophy, social philosophy, and interdisciplinary themes relevant to how people interpret meaning. In the humanities in modern academia, the latter style of literary scholarship is an offshoot of post-structuralism. Consequently, the word theory became an umbrella term for scholarly approaches to reading texts, some of which are informed by strands of semiotics, cultural studies, philosophy of language, and continental philosophy, often witnessed within Western canon along with some postmodernist theory.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Social constructionism</span> Sociological theory regarding shared understandings

Social constructionism is a term used in sociology, social ontology, and communication theory. The term can serve somewhat different functions in each field; however, the foundation of this theoretical framework suggests various facets of social reality—such as concepts, beliefs, norms, and values—are formed through continuous interactions and negotiations among society's members, rather than empirical observation of physical reality. The theory of social constructionism posits that much of what individuals perceive as 'reality' is actually the outcome of a dynamic process of construction influenced by social conventions and structures.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Narrative</span> Account that presents connected events

A narrative, story, or tale is any account of a series of related events or experiences, whether non-fictional or fictional. Narratives can be presented through a sequence of written or spoken words, through still or moving images, or through any combination of these. The word derives from the Latin verb narrare, which is derived from the adjective gnarus. The formal and literary process of constructing a narrative—narration—is one of the four traditional rhetorical modes of discourse, along with argumentation, description, and exposition. This is a somewhat distinct usage from narration in the narrower sense of a commentary used to convey a story. Many additional narrative techniques, particularly literary ones, are used to build and enhance any given story.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jerome Bruner</span> American psychologist and scholar

Jerome Seymour Bruner was an American psychologist who made significant contributions to human cognitive psychology and cognitive learning theory in educational psychology. Bruner was a senior research fellow at the New York University School of Law. He received a BA in 1937 from Duke University and a PhD from Harvard University in 1941. He taught and did research at Harvard University, the University of Oxford, and New York University. A Review of General Psychology survey, published in 2002, ranked Bruner as the 28th most cited psychologist of the 20th century.

Metafiction is a form of fiction that emphasizes its own narrative structure in a way that inherently reminds the audience that they are reading or viewing a fictional work. Metafiction is self-conscious about language, literary form, and story-telling, and works of metafiction directly or indirectly draw attention to their status as artifacts. Metafiction is frequently used as a form of parody or a tool to undermine literary conventions and explore the relationship between literature and reality, life and art.

Russian formalism was a school of literary theory in Russia from the 1910s to the 1930s. It includes the work of a number of highly influential Russian and Soviet scholars such as Viktor Shklovsky, Yuri Tynianov, Vladimir Propp, Boris Eichenbaum, Roman Jakobson, Boris Tomashevsky, Grigory Gukovsky who revolutionised literary criticism between 1914 and the 1930s by establishing the specificity and autonomy of poetic language and literature. Russian formalism exerted a major influence on thinkers like Mikhail Bakhtin and Juri Lotman, and on structuralism as a whole. The movement's members had a relevant influence on modern literary criticism, as it developed in the structuralist and post-structuralist periods. Under Stalin it became a pejorative term for elitist art.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Unreliable narrator</span> Narrator whose credibility is compromised

In literature, film, and other such arts, an unreliable narrator is a narrator who cannot be trusted, one whose credibility is compromised. They can be found in fiction and film, and range from children to mature characters. While unreliable narrators are almost by definition first-person narrators, arguments have been made for the existence of unreliable second- and third-person narrators, especially within the context of film and television, but sometimes also in literature.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mikhail Bakhtin</span> Russian philosopher and literary theorist (1895–1975)

Mikhail Mikhailovich Bakhtin was a Russian philosopher, literary critic and scholar who worked on literary theory, ethics, and the philosophy of language. His writings, on a variety of subjects, inspired scholars working in a number of different traditions and in disciplines as diverse as literary criticism, history, philosophy, sociology, anthropology and psychology. Although Bakhtin was active in the debates on aesthetics and literature that took place in the Soviet Union in the 1920s, his distinctive position did not become well known until he was rediscovered by Russian scholars in the 1960s.

Narratology is the study of narrative and narrative structure and the ways that these affect human perception. The term is an anglicisation of French narratologie, coined by Tzvetan Todorov. Its theoretical lineage is traceable to Aristotle (Poetics) but modern narratology is agreed to have begun with the Russian formalists, particularly Vladimir Propp, and Mikhail Bakhtin's theories of heteroglossia, dialogism, and the chronotope first presented in The Dialogic Imagination (1975).

The Prague school or Prague linguistic circle is a language and literature society. It started in 1926 as a group of linguists, philologists and literary critics in Prague. Its proponents developed methods of structuralist literary analysis and a theory of the standard language and of language cultivation from 1928 to 1939. The linguistic circle was founded in the Café Derby in Prague, which is also where meetings took place during its first years.

The semiosphere is a concept in biosemiotic theory, according to which - contrary to ideas of nature determining sense and experience - the phenomenal world is a creative and logical structure of processes of semiosis where signs operate together to produce sense and experience.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Valentin Voloshinov</span> Russian-Soviet linguist and Marxist theorist

Valentin Nikolaevich Voloshinov was a Russian Soviet linguist, whose work has been influential in the field of literary theory and Marxist theory of ideology.

Formalism is a school of literary criticism and literary theory having mainly to do with structural purposes of a particular text. It is the study of a text without taking into account any outside influence. Formalism rejects or sometimes simply "brackets" notions of culture or societal influence, authorship, and content, and instead focuses on modes, genres, discourse, and forms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fabula and syuzhet</span> Terms describing narrative construction

In narratology, fabula refers to the chronological sequence of events within the world of a narrative and syuzhet equates to the sequence of events as they are presented to the reader. Vladimir Propp and Viktor Shklovsky originated the terminology as part of the Russian Formalism movement in the early 20th century. Narratologists have described fabula as "the raw material of a story", and syuzhet as "the way a story is organized".

Lubomír Doležel was a Czech literary theorist and one of the founders of the so-called fictional worlds theory.

Structural linguistics, or structuralism, in linguistics, denotes schools or theories in which language is conceived as a self-contained, self-regulating semiotic system whose elements are defined by their relationship to other elements within the system. It is derived from the work of Swiss linguist Ferdinand de Saussure and is part of the overall approach of structuralism. Saussure's Course in General Linguistics, published posthumously in 1916, stressed examining language as a dynamic system of interconnected units. Saussure is also known for introducing several basic dimensions of semiotic analysis that are still important today. Two of these are his key methods of syntagmatic and paradigmatic analysis, which define units syntactically and lexically, respectively, according to their contrast with the other units in the system. Other key features of structuralism are the focus on systematic phenomena, the primacy of an idealized form over actual speech data, the priority of linguistic form over meaning, the marginalization of written language, and the connection of linguistic structure to broader social, behavioral, or cognitive phenomena.

In literary theory, literariness is the organisation of language which through special linguistic and formal properties distinguishes literary texts from non-literary texts. The defining features of a literary work do not reside in extraliterary conditions such as history or sociocultural phenomena under which a literary text might have been created, but in the form of the language that is used. Thus, literariness is defined as being the feature that makes a given work a literary work. It distinguishes a literary work from ordinary texts by using certain artistic devices such as metre, rhyme, and other patterns of sound and repetition.

Quantum fiction is a genre of speculative fiction that reflects modern experience of the material world and reality as influenced by quantum theory and new principles in quantum physics. It is characterized by the use of an element in quantum mechanics as a storytelling device. The genre is not necessarily science-themed, and blurs the line separating science fiction and fantasy into a broad scope of mainstream literature that transcends the mechanical model of science and involves the fantasy of human perception or imagination as realistic components affecting the everyday physical world.

The twentieth century Russian philosopher and literary theorist Mikhail Bakhtin wrote extensively on the concept of dialogue. Although Bakhtin's work took many different directions over the course of his life, dialogue always remained the "master key" to understanding his worldview. Bakhtin described the open-ended dialogue as "the single adequate form for verbally expressing authentic human life". In it "a person participates wholly and throughout his whole life: with his eyes, lips, hands, soul, spirit, with his whole body and deeds. He invests his entire self in discourse, and this discourse enters into the dialogic fabric of human life, into the world symposium."

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 Busselle, Rick; Bilandzic, Helena (April 18, 2008). "Fictionality and Perceived Realism in Experiencing Stories: A Model of Narrative Comprehension and Engagement". Communication Theory. 18 (2): 255–280. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00322.x. ISSN   1050-3293.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Mills, John A. (October 10, 2010). "Incorporating Realist Fiction into Dialogical Theories of the Self". Theory & Psychology. 20 (5): 621–640. doi:10.1177/0959354310364205. ISSN   0959-3543.
  3. ↑ Carroll, Noël (2014). On Some Affective Relations between Audiences and the Characters in Popular Fictions. Oxford University Press. pp. 162–184. ISBN   9780199539956.
  4. ↑ "TikTok is taking the book industry by storm, and retailers are taking notice". NBC News. 2021-07-06. Retrieved 2024-05-02.
  5. ↑ Moghaddam, Fathali M. (September 2004). "From 'Psychology in Literature' to 'Psychology is Literature'". Theory & Psychology. 14 (4): 505–525. doi:10.1177/0959354304044922. ISSN   0959-3543.
  6. ↑ Mills, John A. (October 2010). "Incorporating Realist Fiction into Dialogical Theories of the Self". Theory & Psychology. 20 (5): 621–640. doi:10.1177/0959354310364205. ISSN   0959-3543.
  7. ↑ Sebeok, Thomas Albert, ed. (1978). Style in language. The MIT Press paperback series (7. print ed.). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. ISBN   978-0-262-69010-2.
  8. ↑ Barthes, Roland; Miller, Richard (2000). S/Z: an essay (27. print ed.). New York: Hill and Wang. ISBN   978-0-374-52167-7.
  9. 1 2 Groden, Michael (2004). "Structuralism". The Johns Hopkins Guide to Literary Theory and Criticism. Johns Hopkins University Press. doi:10.56021/9780801880100. ISBN   978-0-8018-8010-0.
  10. 1 2 Galan, F. W. (March 1979). "Literary System and Systemic Change: The Prague School Theory of Literary History, 1928–48". Publications of the Modern Language Association of America. 94 (2): 275–285. doi:10.2307/461891. ISSN   0030-8129. JSTOR   461891.
  11. ↑ Bachtin, Michail Michajlovič; Holquist, Michael; Emerson, Caryl; Bachtin, Michail Michajlovič (2011). The dialogic imagination: four essays. University of Texas Press Slavic series (18. paperback printing ed.). Austin, Tex: Univ. of Texas Press. ISBN   978-0-292-71534-9.
  12. ↑ Bachtin, Michail Michajlovič (2011). Problems of Dostoevsky's poetics. Theory and history of literature (12 printing ed.). Minneapolis, Minn: Univ. of Minnesota. ISBN   978-0-8166-1228-4.
  13. 1 2 Kermode, Frank (2000). The sense of an ending: studies in the theory of fiction: with a new epilogue (2nd ed.). Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN   978-0-19-513612-8.
  14. 1 2 Doležel, Lubomír (2009). Heterocosmica: fiction and possible worlds. Parallax re-visions of culture and society. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN   978-0-8018-6738-5.
  15. 1 2 3 Leclerc, André (2016-04-30). "Actualism and Fictional Characters". Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology. 20 (1): 61. doi:10.5007/1808-1711.2016v20n1p61. ISSN   1808-1711.
  16. 1 2 3 Alward, Peter (2022-08-25). "The Fictional Road Not Taken: A Weak Anti-realist Theory of Fiction". The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 80 (3): 333–344. doi:10.1093/jaac/kpac016. ISSN   0021-8529.
  17. 1 2 Pavel, Thomas G. (1986). Fictional worlds (2. print ed.). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Pr. ISBN   978-0-674-29966-5.
  18. ↑ Goodman, Nelson (2013). Ways of worldmaking. Hackett Classic (11. pr ed.). Indianapolis, Ind: Hackett. ISBN   978-0-915144-51-8.
  19. ↑ Vaihinger, Hans (November 1924). "The Philosophy of "As if": a System of the Theoretical, Practical and Religious Fictions of Mankind". Routeledge. 114 (2872): 714. Bibcode:1924Natur.114Q.714.. doi:10.1038/114714a0. ISSN   0028-0836.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.