Floral scent

Last updated

Floral scent, or flower scent, is composed of all the volatile organic compounds (VOCs), or aroma compounds, emitted by floral tissue (e.g. flower petals). Other names for floral scent include, aroma, fragrance, floral odour or perfume. Flower scent of most flowering plant species encompasses a diversity of VOCs, sometimes up to several hundred different compounds. [1] [2] The primary functions of floral scent are to deter herbivores and especially folivorous insects (see Plant defense against herbivory), and to attract pollinators. Floral scent is one of the most important communication channels mediating plant-pollinator interactions, along with visual cues (flower color, shape, etc.). [3]

Contents

Flowers of Lonicera japonica emit a sweet, subtle fragrance mainly composed of linalool. Starr 071024-0039 Lonicera japonica.jpg
Flowers of Lonicera japonica emit a sweet, subtle fragrance mainly composed of linalool.

Biotic interactions

Perception by flower visitors

Flower visitors such as insects and bats detect floral scents thanks to chemoreceptors of variable specificity to a specific VOC. The fixation of a VOC on a chemoreceptor triggers the activation of an antennal glomerulus, further projecting on an olfactory receptor neuron and finally triggering a behavioral response after processing the information (see also Olfaction, Insect olfaction). The simultaneous perception of various VOCs may cause the activation of several glomeruli, but the output signal may not be additive due to synergistic or antagonistic mechanisms linked with inter-neuronal activity. [5] Therefore, the perception of a VOC within a floral blend may trigger a different behavioral response than when perceived isolated. Similarly, the output signal is not proportional to the amount of VOCs, with some VOCs in low amounts in the floral blend having major effects on pollinator behavior. A good characterization of floral scent, both qualitative and quantitative, is necessary to understand and potentially predict flower visitors' behavior.

Flower visitors use floral scents to detect, recognize and locate their host species and even discriminate among flowers of the same plant. [6] This is made possible by the high specificity of floral scent, where both diversity of VOCs and their relative amount may characterize the flowering species, an individual plant, a flower of the plant, and the distance of the plume from the source.

To make the best use of this specific information, flower visitors rely on long-term and short-term memory that allows them to efficiently choose their flowers. [7] They learn to associate the floral scent of a plant with a reward such as nectar and pollen, [8] and have different behavioral responses to known scents versus unknown ones. [9] They are also able to react similarly to slightly different odor blends. [10]

Mediated biotic interactions

Pollinators use both floral scent and floral colour to locate flowers of Antirrhinum majus spp. striatum. Pollinator Amajus.jpg
Pollinators use both floral scent and floral colour to locate flowers of Antirrhinum majus spp. striatum.

A primary function of floral scent is to attract pollinators and ensure the reproduction of animal-pollinated plants.

Some families of VOCs presented in floral scents have likely evolved as herbivore repellents. [12] However, these plant defenses are also used by herbivores themselves to locate a plant resource, similar to pollinators attracted by the floral scent. [13] Therefore, flower traits can be subject to antagonistic selection pressures (positive selection by pollinators and negative selection by herbivores). [14]

Plant-plant communications

Plants have an array of volatile compounds they can release to signal other plants. By unleashing these cues, plants learn more about their environment and sufficiently respond. However, there are still many factors about plant scents scientists are still trying to understand. Scientists have studied how many of the volatile compounds released by plants are from a floral source. A study concluded that floral cues are as important as other volatile compounds and are pertinent for plant-to-plant communication. [15] Further research found that plants who receive the floral volatiles have higher fitness than other volatile cues because floral cues are the only compounds released by plants that indicate their kind of mating environment. [16] Plants are able to respond to these mating cues and change adjustable floral phenotypes that can affect plant pollination and mating. Floral volatiles can ward off or attract pollinators/mates all at once. Depending on the number of floral signals released by a plant can control the level of attracting/repelling the plant wants. The composition of floral compounds and the rate of their release are the potential factors that control attraction/repellence. These two elements can be in response to ecological cues like high plant density and temperature. [17] For instance, in sexually deceptive orchids, floral scents emitted after pollination reduce the flower's attractiveness to pollinators. This mechanism acts as a signal to pollinators to visit unpollinated flowers. [18]

Environmental conditions can affect plant communication and signaling. Signal factors include temperature and plant density. Environmentally high temperatures increase the rate of releasing floral compounds, which can increase the amount of signal released and thus its ability to reach more plants. [17] When plant density increases, plant communication increases as well, since plants would be near each other and have signals reach many neighboring plants. This can also increase the signal's reliability and lowering the chance the signal will degrade before it can reach other plants. [17]

Biosynthesis of floral VOCs

Most floral VOCs belong to three main chemical classes. [2] [6] VOCs in the same chemical class are synthesized from a shared precursor, but the biochemical pathway is specific for each VOC and often varies from one plant species to another.

Terpenoids (or isoprenoids) are derived from isoprene and synthesized via the mevalonate pathway or the erythritol phosphate pathway. They represent the majority of floral VOCs and are often the most abundant compounds in floral scent blends. [19]

The second chemical class is composed of the fatty acid derivatives synthesized from acetyl-CoA, most of which are known as green leaf volatiles, because they are also emitted by vegetative parts (i.e.: leaves and stems) of plants, and sometimes higher in abundance than from floral tissue.

The third chemical class is composed of benzenoids/phenylpropanoids, also known as aromatic compounds; they are synthesized from phenylalanine.

Regulation of emissions

Floral scent emissions of most flowering plants vary predictably throughout the day, following a circadian rhythm. This variation is controlled by light intensity. [20] Maximal emissions coincide with peaks of the highest activity of visiting pollinators. For instance, snapdragon flowers, mostly pollinated by bees, have the highest emissions at noon, whereas nocturnally-visited tobacco plants have the highest emissions at night. [21]

Floral scent emissions also vary along with floral development, with the highest emissions at anthesis, [22] i.e. when the flower is fecund (highly fertile), and reduced emissions after pollination, probably due to mechanisms linked with fecundation. [23] In tropical orchids, floral scent emission is terminated immediately following pollination, reducing the expenditure of energy on fragrance production. [24] In petunia flowers, ethylene is released to stop the synthesis of benzenoid floral volatiles after successful pollination. [25]

Abiotic factors, such as temperature, atmospheric CO2 concentration, hydric stress, and soil nutrient status also impact the regulation of floral scent. [26] For instance, increased temperatures in the environment can increase the emission of VOCs in flowers, potentially altering communication between plants and pollinators. [17]

Finally, biotic interactions may also affect the floral scent. Plant leaves attacked by herbivores emit new VOCs in response to the attack, the so-called herbivore-induced plant volatiles (HIPVs). [27] Similarly, damaged flowers have a modified floral scent compared to undamaged ones. Micro-organisms present in nectar may alter floral scent emissions as well. [28]

Measurement

Measuring floral scent both qualitatively (identification of VOCs) and quantitatively (absolute and/or relative emission of VOCs) requires the use of analytical chemistry techniques. It requires collecting floral VOCs, and then analyzing them.

VOCs sampling

The most popular methods rely on adsorbing floral VOCs on an adsorbent material such as SPME fibers or cartridges by pumping air sampled around inflorescences through the adsorbent material.

It is also possible to extract chemicals stocked in petals by immersing them in a solvent and then analyze the liquid residue. This is more adapted to the study of heavier organic compounds, and/or VOCs that are stored in floral tissue before being emitted into air.

Sample analysis

Desorption

  • Thermal desorption: the adsorbent material is flash-heated so that all adsorbed VOCs are carried away from the adsorbent and injected into the separation system. This is how work injectors in gas chromatography machines, which literally volatilize introduced samples. For VOCs adsorbed on bigger amount of adsorbent material such as cartridges, thermal desorption may require the use of a specific machine, a thermal desorber, connected to the separation system.
  • Desorption by solvent: VOCs adsorbed on the adsorbent material are carried away by a small quantity of solvent which is volatilized and injected in the separation system. Most commonly used solvents are very volatile molecules, such as methanol, to avoid co-elution with slightly heavier VOCs

Separation

Gas chromatography (GC) is ideal to separate volatilized VOCs due to their low molecular weight. VOCs are carried by a gas vector (helium) through a chromatographic column (the solid phase) on which they have different affinities, which allows to separate them.

Liquid chromatography may be used for liquid extractions of floral tissue.

Detection and identification

Separation systems are coupled with a detector, that allows the detection and identification of VOCs based on their molecular weight and chemical properties. The most used system for the analysis of floral scent samples is GC-MS (gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry).

Quantification

Quantification of VOCs is based on the peak area measured on the chromatogram and compared to the peak area of a chemical standard: [29]

  • Internal calibration: a known quantity of a specific chemical standard is injected together with the VOCs, the measured area on the chromatogram is proportional to the injected quantity. Because the chemical properties of VOCs alter their affinity to the solid phase (the chromatographic column) and subsequently the peak area on the chromatogram, it is best to use several standards that reflect the best chemical diversity of the floral scent sample. This method allows a more robust comparison among samples.
  • External calibration: calibration curves (quantity vs. peak area) are established independently by the injection of a range of quantities of chemical standard. This method is best when the relative and absolute amount of VOCs in floral scent samples varies from sample to sample and from VOC to VOC and when the chemical diversity of VOCs in the sample is high. However, it is more time-consuming and may be a source of errors (e.g. matrix effects due to solvent or very abundant VOCs compared to trace VOCs [30] ).

Specificity of floral scent analysis

Floral scent is often composed of hundreds of VOCs, in very variable proportions. The method used is a tradeoff between accurately detecting quantifying minor compounds and avoiding detector saturation by major compounds. For most analysis methods routinely used, the detection threshold of many VOCs is still higher than the perception threshold of insects, [31] which reduces our capacity to understand plant-insect interactions mediated by floral scent.

Further, the chemical diversity in floral scent samples is challenging. The time of analysis is proportional to the range in molecular weight of VOCs present in the sample, hence a high diversity will increase analysis time. Floral scent may also be composed of very similar molecules, such as isomers and especially enantiomers, which tend to co-elute and then to be very hardly separated. Unambiguously detecting and quantifying them is of importance though, as enantiomers may trigger very different responses in pollinators. [32]

Related Research Articles

<i>Erysimum</i> Genus of flowering plants

Erysimum, or wallflower, is a genus of flowering plants in the cabbage family, Brassicaceae. It includes more than 150 species, both popular garden plants and many wild forms. The genus Cheiranthus is sometimes included here in whole or in part. Erysimum has since the early 21st century been ascribed to a monogeneric cruciferous tribe, Erysimeae, characterised by sessile, stellate (star-shaped) and/or malpighiaceous (two-sided) trichomes, yellow to orange flowers and multiseeded siliques.

Chemical ecology is the study of chemically-mediated interactions between living organisms, and the effects of those interactions on the demography, behavior and ultimately evolution of the organisms involved. It is thus a vast and highly interdisciplinary field. Chemical ecologists seek to identify the specific molecules that function as signals mediating community or ecosystem processes and to understand the evolution of these signals. The substances that serve in such roles are typically small, readily-diffusible organic molecules, but can also include larger molecules and small peptides.

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are organic compounds that have a high vapor pressure at room temperature. High vapor pressure correlates with a low boiling point, which relates to the number of the sample's molecules in the surrounding air, a trait known as volatility.

<i>Cirsium arvense</i> Species of flowering plant

Cirsium arvense is a perennial species of flowering plant in the family Asteraceae, native throughout Europe and western Asia, northern Africa and widely introduced elsewhere. The standard English name in its native area is creeping thistle. It is also commonly known as Canada thistle and field thistle.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Euglossini</span> Tribe of bees

The tribe Euglossini, in the subfamily Apinae, commonly known as orchid bees or euglossine bees, are the only group of corbiculate bees whose non-parasitic members do not all possess eusocial behavior.

A semiochemical, from the Greek σημεῖον (semeion), meaning "signal", is a chemical substance or mixture released by an organism that affects the behaviors of other individuals. Semiochemical communication can be divided into two broad classes: communication between individuals of the same species (intraspecific) or communication between different species (interspecific).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nectar</span> Sugar-rich liquid produced by many flowering plants, that attracts pollinators and insects

Nectar is a sugar-rich liquid produced by plants in glands called nectaries or nectarines, either within the flowers with which it attracts pollinating animals, or by extrafloral nectaries, which provide a nutrient source to animal mutualists, which in turn provide herbivore protection. Common nectar-consuming pollinators include mosquitoes, hoverflies, wasps, bees, butterflies and moths, hummingbirds, honeyeaters and bats. Nectar plays a crucial role in the foraging economics and evolution of nectar-eating species; for example, nectar foraging behavior is largely responsible for the divergent evolution of the African honey bee, A. m. scutellata and the western honey bee.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Plant defense against herbivory</span> Plants defenses against being eaten

Plant defense against herbivory or host-plant resistance (HPR) describes a range of adaptations evolved by plants which improve their survival and reproduction by reducing the impact of herbivores. Plants can sense being touched, and they can use several strategies to defend against damage caused by herbivores. Many plants produce secondary metabolites, known as allelochemicals, that influence the behavior, growth, or survival of herbivores. These chemical defenses can act as repellents or toxins to herbivores or reduce plant digestibility. Another defensive strategy of plants is changing their attractiveness. To prevent overconsumption by large herbivores, plants alter their appearance by changing their size or quality, overall decreasing their consumption rate.

<i>Gomphrena globosa</i> Species of flowering plant

Gomphrena globosa, commonly known as globe amaranth, is an edible plant from the family Amaranthaceae. The round-shaped flower inflorescences are a visually dominant feature and cultivars have been propagated to exhibit shades of magenta, purple, red, orange, white, pink, and lilac. Within the flowerheads, the true flowers are small and inconspicuous.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pollination syndrome</span>

Pollination syndromes are suites of flower traits that have evolved in response to natural selection imposed by different pollen vectors, which can be abiotic or biotic, such as birds, bees, flies, and so forth through a process called pollinator-mediated selection. These traits include flower shape, size, colour, odour, reward type and amount, nectar composition, timing of flowering, etc. For example, tubular red flowers with copious nectar often attract birds; foul smelling flowers attract carrion flies or beetles, etc.

Headspace technology is a technique developed in the 1980s to elucidate the odor compounds present in the air surrounding various objects. Usually the objects of interest are odoriferous objects such as plants, flowers and foods. Similar techniques are also used to analyze the interesting scents of locations and environments such as tea shops and saw mills. After the data is analyzed, the scents can then be recreated by a perfumer.

<i>Nicotiana attenuata</i> Species of flowering plant

Nicotiana attenuata is a species of wild tobacco known by the common name coyote tobacco. It is native to western North America from British Columbia to Texas and northern Mexico, where it grows in many types of habitat. It is a glandular and sparsely hairy annual herb exceeding a meter in maximum height. The leaf blades may be 10 centimetres (4 in) long, the lower ones oval and the upper narrower in shape, and are borne on petioles. The inflorescence bears several flowers with pinkish or greenish white tubular throats 2 to 3 centimetres long, their bases enclosed in pointed sepals. The flower face has five mostly white lobes. The fruit is a capsule about 1 centimetre long.

Green leaf volatiles (GLV) are volatile organic compounds that are released when plants suffer tissue damage. Specifically, they include aldehydes, esters, and alcohols of 6-carbon compounds released after wounding. These compounds are very quickly produced and emitted, and are used by nearly every green plant. Plants constantly release GLVs, but un-stressed plants release them in much smaller amounts. Some of these chemicals act as signaling compounds between either plants of the same species, of other species, or even vastly different lifeforms like insects. Some, although not necessarily all, of these chemicals act essentially as plant pheromones.[12] GLVs also have antimicrobial properties to prevent infection at the site of injury.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mimicry in plants</span>

In evolutionary biology, mimicry in plants is where a plant organism evolves to resemble another organism physically or chemically, increasing the mimic's Darwinian fitness. Mimicry in plants has been studied far less than mimicry in animals, with fewer documented cases and peer-reviewed studies. However, it may provide protection against herbivory, or may deceptively encourage mutualists, like pollinators, to provide a service without offering a reward in return.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tritrophic interactions in plant defense</span> Ecological interactions

Tritrophic interactions in plant defense against herbivory describe the ecological impacts of three trophic levels on each other: the plant, the herbivore, and its natural enemies. They may also be called multitrophic interactions when further trophic levels, such as soil microbes, endophytes, or hyperparasitoids are considered. Tritrophic interactions join pollination and seed dispersal as vital biological functions which plants perform via cooperation with animals.

Volatolomics is a branch of chemistry that studies volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted by a biological system, under specific experimental conditions.

Floral biology is an area of ecological research that studies the evolutionary factors that have moulded the structures, behaviour and physiological aspects involved in the flowering of plants. The field is broad and interdisciplinary and involves research requiring expertise from multiple disciplines that can include botany, ethology, biochemistry, entomoloniques. A slightly narrower area of research within floral biology is sometimes termed as pollination biology or anthecology.

Plants can be exposed to many stress factors such as disease, temperature changes, herbivory, injury and more. Therefore, in order to respond or be ready for any kind of physiological state, they need to develop some sort of system for their survival in the moment and/or for the future. Plant communication encompasses communication using volatile organic compounds, electrical signaling, and common mycorrhizal networks between plants and a host of other organisms such as soil microbes, other plants, animals, insects, and fungi. Plants communicate through a host of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that can be separated into four broad categories, each the product of distinct chemical pathways: fatty acid derivatives, phenylpropanoids/benzenoids, amino acid derivatives, and terpenoids. Due to the physical/chemical constraints most VOCs are of low molecular mass, are hydrophobic, and have high vapor pressures. The responses of organisms to plant emitted VOCs varies from attracting the predator of a specific herbivore to reduce mechanical damage inflicted on the plant to the induction of chemical defenses of a neighboring plant before it is being attacked. In addition, the host of VOCs emitted varies from plant to plant, where for example, the Venus Fly Trap can emit VOCs to specifically target and attract starved prey. While these VOCs typically lead to increased resistance to herbivory in neighboring plants, there is no clear benefit to the emitting plant in helping nearby plants. As such, whether neighboring plants have evolved the capability to "eavesdrop" or whether there is an unknown tradeoff occurring is subject to much scientific debate. As related to the aspect of meaning-making, the field is also identified as phytosemiotics.

Bergamotenes are a group of isomeric chemical compounds with the molecular formula C15H24. The bergamotenes are found in a variety of plants, particularly in their essential oils.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Robert Raguso</span>

Robert A. Raguso is an American biologist and professor at Cornell University in the Department of Neurobiology and Behavior. He has expanded the field of chemical ecology by introducing and pioneering floral scent as a key component of plant-pollinator communication, with special focus on hawkmoths and Clarkia plants.

References

  1. ↑ Knudsen, Jette T.; Eriksson, Roger; Gershenzon, Jonathan; Ståhl, Bertil (March 2006). "Diversity and Distribution of Floral Scent". The Botanical Review. 72 (1): 1–120. doi:10.1663/0006-8101(2006)72[1:DADOFS]2.0.CO;2. S2CID   24559115.
  2. 1 2 Piechulla, B.; Effmert, U. (2010). "Biosynthesis and Regulation of Flower Scent". Plant Developmental Biology - Biotechnological Perspectives. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 189–205. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04670-4_10. ISBN   9783642046698.
  3. ↑ Raguso, Robert A. (December 2008). "Wake Up and Smell the Roses: The Ecology and Evolution of Floral Scent". Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 39 (1): 549–569. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095601.
  4. ↑ El-Sayed, A. M.; Mitchell, V. J.; McLaren, G. F.; Manning, L. M.; Bunn, B.; Suckling, D. M. (15 May 2009). "Attraction of New Zealand Flower Thrips, Thrips obscuratus, to cis-Jasmone, a Volatile Identified from Japanese Honeysuckle Flowers". Journal of Chemical Ecology. 35 (6): 656–663. doi:10.1007/s10886-009-9619-3. PMID   19444522. S2CID   9504546.
  5. ↑ Cunningham, J. P. (2012-02-01). "Can mechanism help explain insect host choice?" (PDF). Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 25 (2): 244–251. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02435.x . ISSN   1420-9101. PMID   22225990. S2CID   25567175.
  6. 1 2 Dudareva, Natalia; Negre, Florence; Nagegowda, Dinesh A.; Orlova, Irina (October 2006). "Plant Volatiles: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives". Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. 25 (5): 417–440. doi:10.1080/07352680600899973. S2CID   84019949.
  7. ↑ Chittka, Lars; Thomson, James D.; Waser, Nickolas M. (1999). "Flower Constancy, Insect Psychology, and Plant Evolution". Naturwissenschaften. 86 (8): 361–377. Bibcode:1999NW.....86..361C. doi:10.1007/s001140050636. ISSN   0028-1042. S2CID   27377784.
  8. ↑ Giurfa, Martin (2007-07-17). "Behavioral and neural analysis of associative learning in the honeybee: a taste from the magic well". Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 193 (8): 801–824. doi:10.1007/s00359-007-0235-9. ISSN   0340-7594. PMID   17639413. S2CID   9164757.
  9. ↑ Junker, Robert R.; Höcherl, Nicole; Blüthgen, Nico (2010-07-01). "Responses to olfactory signals reflect network structure of flower-visitor interactions". Journal of Animal Ecology. 79 (4): 818–823. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01698.x. ISSN   1365-2656. PMID   20412348.
  10. ↑ Guerrieri, Fernando; Schubert, Marco; Sandoz, Jean-Christophe; Giurfa, Martin (2005-02-22). "Perceptual and Neural Olfactory Similarity in Honeybees". PLOS Biol. 3 (4): e60. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030060. ISSN   1545-7885. PMC   1043859 . PMID   15736975.
  11. ↑ Jaworski, Coline C.; Andalo, Christophe; Raynaud, Christine; Simon, Valérie; Thébaud, Christophe; Chave, Jérôme; Huang, Shuang-Quan (11 August 2015). "The Influence of Prior Learning Experience on Pollinator Choice: An Experiment Using Bumblebees on Two Wild Floral Types of Antirrhinum majus". PLOS ONE. 10 (8): e0130225. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1030225J. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130225 . PMC   4532467 . PMID   26263186.
  12. ↑ Schiestl, Florian P. (2010-05-01). "The evolution of floral scent and insect chemical communication". Ecology Letters. 13 (5): 643–656. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01451.x. ISSN   1461-0248. PMID   20337694.
  13. ↑ Theis, Nina; Adler, Lynn S. (2012-02-01). "Advertising to the enemy: enhanced floral fragrance increases beetle attraction and reduces plant reproduction". Ecology. 93 (2): 430–435. doi:10.1890/11-0825.1. ISSN   1939-9170. PMID   22624324.
  14. ↑ Strauss, S., and J. Whittall. 2006. Non-pollinator agents of selection on floral traits. Pp. 120–138 in Ecology and evolution of flowers. OUP Oxford.
  15. ↑ Caruso, Christina M.; Parachnowitsch, Amy L. (2016-01-01). "Do Plants Eavesdrop on Floral Scent Signals?". Trends in Plant Science. 21 (1): 9–15. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2015.09.001. ISSN   1360-1385. PMID   26476624.
  16. ↑ Harder, Lawrence D.; Johnson, Steven D. (August 2009). "Darwin's beautiful contrivances: evolutionary and functional evidence for floral adaptation". New Phytologist. 183 (3): 530–545. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02914.x . ISSN   0028-646X.
  17. 1 2 3 4 Farré-Armengol, Gerard; Filella, Iolanda; Llusià, Joan; Niinemets, Ülo; Peñuelas, Josep (December 2014). "Changes in floral bouquets from compound-specific responses to increasing temperatures". Global Change Biology. 20 (12): 3660–3669. doi:10.1111/gcb.12628. PMC   5788256 . PMID   24817412.
  18. ↑ Schiestl, Florian P.; Ayasse, Manfred (2001-02-01). "Post-pollination emission of a repellent compound in a sexually deceptive orchid: a new mechanism for maximising reproductive success?". Oecologia. 126 (4): 531–534. doi:10.1007/s004420000552. ISSN   1432-1939. PMID   28547238. S2CID   5035741.
  19. ↑ Gershenzon, Jonathan; Dudareva, Natalia (18 June 2007). "The function of terpene natural products in the natural world". Nature Chemical Biology. 3 (7): 408–414. doi:10.1038/nchembio.2007.5. PMID   17576428.
  20. ↑ Harmer, Stacey L.; Hogenesch, John B.; Straume, Marty; Chang, Hur-Song; Han, Bin; Zhu, Tong; Wang, Xun; Kreps, Joel A.; Kay, Steve A. (2000-12-15). "Orchestrated Transcription of Key Pathways in Arabidopsis by the Circadian Clock". Science. 290 (5499): 2110–2113. Bibcode:2000Sci...290.2110H. doi:10.1126/science.290.5499.2110. ISSN   0036-8075. PMID   11118138. S2CID   8920347.
  21. ↑ Kolosova, Natalia; Gorenstein, Nina; Kish, Christine M.; Dudareva, Natalia (2001-10-01). "Regulation of Circadian Methyl Benzoate Emission in Diurnally and Nocturnally Emitting Plants". The Plant Cell. 13 (10): 2333–2347. doi:10.1105/tpc.010162. ISSN   1532-298X. PMC   139162 . PMID   11595805.
  22. ↑ Dudareva, Natalia; Murfitt, Lisa M.; Mann, Craig J.; Gorenstein, Nina; Kolosova, Natalia; Kish, Christine M.; Bonham, Connie; Wood, Karl (2000-06-01). "Developmental Regulation of Methyl Benzoate Biosynthesis and Emission in Snapdragon Flowers". The Plant Cell. 12 (6): 949–961. doi:10.1105/tpc.12.6.949. ISSN   1532-298X. PMC   149095 . PMID   10852939.
  23. ↑ Negre, Florence; Kish, Christine M.; Boatright, Jennifer; Underwood, Beverly; Shibuya, Kenichi; Wagner, Conrad; Clark, David G.; Dudareva, Natalia (2003-12-01). "Regulation of Methylbenzoate Emission after Pollination in Snapdragon and Petunia Flowers". The Plant Cell. 15 (12): 2992–3006. doi:10.1105/tpc.016766. ISSN   1532-298X. PMC   282847 . PMID   14630969.
  24. ↑ Arditti, Joseph (1980). "Aspects of the Physiology of Orchids". Advances in Botanical Research Volume 7. Advances in Botanical Research. Vol. 7. pp. 421–655. doi:10.1016/s0065-2296(08)60091-9. ISBN   9780120059072.
  25. ↑ Schuurink, Robert C.; Haring, Michel A.; Clark, David G. (2006). "Regulation of volatile benzenoid biosynthesis in petunia flowers". Trends in Plant Science. 11 (1): 20–25. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2005.09.009. PMID   16226052.
  26. ↑ Piechulla, B.; Effmert, U. (2010-01-01). Pua, Eng Chong; Davey, Michael R. (eds.). Plant Developmental Biology - Biotechnological Perspectives. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 189–205. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04670-4_10. ISBN   9783642046698.
  27. ↑ Arimura, Gen-ichiro; Matsui, Kenji; Takabayashi, Junji (2009-05-01). "Chemical and Molecular Ecology of Herbivore-Induced Plant Volatiles: Proximate Factors and Their Ultimate Functions". Plant and Cell Physiology. 50 (5): 911–923. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcp030 . ISSN   0032-0781. PMID   19246460.
  28. ↑ Peñuelas, Josep; Farré-Armengol, Gerard; Llusia, Joan; Gargallo-Garriga, Albert; Rico, Laura; Sardans, Jordi; Terradas, Jaume; Filella, Iolanda (2014-10-22). "Removal of floral microbiota reduces floral terpene emissions". Scientific Reports. 4: 6727. Bibcode:2014NatSR...4E6727P. doi:10.1038/srep06727. ISSN   2045-2322. PMC   4205883 . PMID   25335793.
  29. ↑ Tholl, Dorothea; Boland, Wilhelm; Hansel, Armin; Loreto, Francesco; Röse, Ursula S.R.; Schnitzler, Jörg-Peter (2006-02-01). "Practical approaches to plant volatile analysis". The Plant Journal. 45 (4): 540–560. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02612.x . ISSN   1365-313X. PMID   16441348.
  30. ↑ Kim, Ki-Hyun; Kim, Yong-Hyun; Brown, Richard J. C. (2013-08-02). "Conditions for the optimal analysis of volatile organic compounds in air with sorbent tube sampling and liquid standard calibration: demonstration of solvent effect". Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 405 (26): 8397–8408. doi:10.1007/s00216-013-7263-9. ISSN   1618-2642. PMID   23907690. S2CID   25005504.
  31. ↑ Macel, Mirka; Van DAM, Nicole M.; Keurentjes, Joost J. B. (2010-07-01). "Metabolomics: the chemistry between ecology and genetics". Molecular Ecology Resources. 10 (4): 583–593. doi:10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02854.x. ISSN   1755-0998. PMID   21565063. S2CID   11608830.
  32. ↑ Parachnowitsch, Amy; Burdon, Rosalie C. F.; Raguso, Robert A.; Kessler, André (2013-01-01). "Natural selection on floral volatile production in Penstemon digitalis: Highlighting the role of linalool". Plant Signaling & Behavior. 8 (1): e22704. doi:10.4161/psb.22704. PMC   3745574 . PMID   23221753.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.