Fourteenth Finance Commission

Last updated

The Fourteenth Finance Commission of India was a finance commission constituted on 2 January 2013. The commission's chairman was former Reserve Bank of India governor Y. V. Reddy and its members were Sushma Nath, M. Govinda Rao, Abhijit Sen, Sudipto Mundle, and AN Jha. The recommendations of the commission entered force in April 2015; they take effect for a five-year period from that date. [1]

Contents

The government of India on 24 February 2015 accepted the recommendations of the fourteenth finance commission for increasing share of states in central taxes to 42% ,the single largest increase ever recommended. It has recommended distribution of goods to states for local bodies using 2011 population data with weight of 90% & area with weight of 10%.

Review of the previous term

Fiscal performance

Sr.NumParticulars as percentage of GDP2001-022004-052007-082008-092009-102010-112011-122012-2013Change 2012–13 over 2007-082013-2014(RE)2014-2015(BE)
ITotal Revenue Receipts (a+b)8.559.4410.879.608.8410.138.348.69-2.179.069.24
a)Non Tax Revenue2.882.502.051.721.792.811.351.36-0.691.701.65
b)Net Tax Revenue5.676.938.817.877.057.326.997.34-1.487.367.59
IIRevenue Expenditure12.8011.8511.9214.1014.0813.3712.7212.300.3812.3312.18
Of which: Interest4.563.923.433.413.293.013.033.10-0.333.353.32
IIICapital Expenditure2.583.502.371.601.742.011.761.65-0.721.681.76
IVTotal Expenditure (II+III)15.3815.3514.2915.7015.8215.3814.4813.95-0.3414.0113.94
VRevenue Deficit (II-I)4.32.51.14.55.23.24.43.62.53.32.9
VIFiscal Deficit6.14.02.56.06.54.85.74.82.34.64.1
VIINon-debt Capital Receipts0.852.050.880.120.510.450.410.40-0.480.320.57

Union

States

by 1.2 percentage point relative to GDP.

Recommendations

Sharing of Union tax revenues with states

Transfers from Union to states consist of tax devolution, non-Plan grants, Plan grants and grants for various Central Supported Schemes (CSS) including those which were transferred directly to the implementing agencies bypassing the budget.

Inputs to the commission

ViewStakeholderThe Commission
Keep the current devolution ratiosUnionRejected
Increase in the share of tax devolutionStatesAccepted
Expansion of the divisible pool with cess and surchargesStatesRejected
Minimum guaranteed tax devolutionStatesRejected
Reduced role of Centrally sponsored schemes (CSS)StatesAccepted
Keep 50% of proceeds from a state in devolutionStatesRejected
Earmark 10–30% of devolution for special category statusStatesRejected
Include demographic change in criteriaStatesAccepted
Equality adjusted Human Development Index as criteriaStatesRejected

Vertical devolution

The fourteenth finance commission is of the view that tax devolution should be the primary route of resources to the states. The commission recommends to increase the tax devolution of the divisible pool to states to 42% for years 2015 to 2020. This is 10% more compared to 32% target set by 13th financial commission.

The commission recommended that the new tax devolution should be the primary route of transfer of resources to States since it is formula based and thus conducive to sound fiscal federalism. However, to the extent that formula-based transfers do not meet the needs of specific States, they need to be supplemented by grants-in-aid.

The commission felt that new target serve the twin objectives of increasing the flow of unconditional transfers to the States and yet leave appropriate fiscal space for the Union to carry out other duties and specific purpose transfers to the States.

Horizontal devolution

The commission came up with new formula to divide the 42% share of the divisible pool between the states.

Area

The commission followed the method adopted by the 12th commission and put the floor limit at 2 percent for smaller States and assigned 15 percent weight.

Forest cover

The commission assigned 7.5 per cent weight to forest cover as the new criteria to balance the benefit of the huge ecological benefits and the opportunity cost in terms of area not available for other economic activities that becomes indicator of fiscal disability.

Population

The commission felt that allocation based on dated population data is not fair, and assigned a 17.5 percent weight to the 1971 population and assigned 10 percent a weight to the 2011 population to capture the demographic changes since 1971, both in terms of migration and age structure.

Income distance

The commission assigned 50% weight to income distance as it is the only measure of fiscal capacity. It is the distance of actual per capita income of a state from the state with the highest per capita. The commission calculated the income distance following the method used the 12th commission. A three-year average (2010-11 to 2012–13) per capita comparable GSDP has been taken for all the twenty-nine states. Income distance has been computed by taking the distance from the state having highest per capita GSDP. Goa had the highest, followed by Sikkim. Since these two are very small states, income distance had been computed from the third, Haryana. Goa, Sikkim and Haryana are assigned the same distance as obtained for Haryana.

Criteria13th Commission Weight(%)14th Commission Weight (%)
Population 19712517.5
Population 2011010
Income Distance47.550
Fiscal Discipline150
Area1015
Forest Cover07.5
Sum100100

Horizontal share of States

The commission came up with the following share of States based on the criteria and the consideration that service tax is not levied and so can not be shared with the State of Jammu & Kashmir.

StatesShare(%)
Andhra Pradesh4.305
Arunachal Pradesh1.370
Assam3.311
Bihar9.665
Chhattisgarh3.080
Goa0.378
Gujarat3.084
Haryana1.084
Himachal Pradesh0.713
Jammu & Kashmir1.854
Jharkhand3.139
Karnataka4.713
Kerala2.500
Madhya Pradesh7.548
Maharashtra5.521
Manipur0.617
Meghalaya0.642
Mizoram0.460
Nagaland0.498
Odisha4.642
Punjab1.577
Rajasthan5.495
Sikkim0.367
Tamil Nadu4.023
Telangana2.437
Tripura0.642
Uttar Pradesh17.959
Uttarakhand1.052
West Bengal7.324
Sum100.000

Local governments

The commission had allocated grants and also identified many sources of income for local bodies and provided the guidelines to Union and State governments to empower them.

Grant allocation

The grants by Union government are to be used only on the basic services within the functions assigned to them by legislation, water supply, sanitation, sewerage, storm water drainage, solid waste management, street lighting, local body roads and footpaths, parks, playgrounds etc.

The Commission fixed the total size of the grant to be Rs. 2,87,436 crore for the period 2015–20, constituting an assistance of Rs. 488 per capita per annum at an aggregate level. Of this, the grant for panchayats is Rs. 2,00,292.2 crore and for municipalities is Rs. 87,143.8 crore.

Local BodyAmount(crores)
Panchayats2,00,292.2
Municipalities87,143.8
Sum2,87,436

Grant devolution

The Commission recommended that distribution of grants shall be given to the States using 2011 population data with weight of 90 percent and area with weight of 10 per cent. The grant to each State will be divided into two - a grant to duly constituted gram panchayats and a grant to duly constituted municipalities, on the basis of urban and rural population of that State using the data of Census 2011.

Criteria13th Commission Weight(%)14th Commission Weight (%)
Population in 201190
Area10
Timetable

Each grant has two components, basic and performance. The commission recommends that 50 per cent of the basic grant for the year is to be released to the State as the first installment of the year. The remaining basic grant and the full performance grant for the year may be released as the second instalment for the year. The State Government have to release the grants to the local bodies within fifteen days of it being credited to their account by the Union Government. In case of any delay, the State Governments have to pay the installment with interest paid from its own funds.

Gram Panchayats

In the case of gram panchayats, 90 per cent of the grant will be the basic grant and 10 per cent will be the performance grant. The grants for Panchayats should go only to them without any share for other levels of government in State. State Governments has to take care of the needs of the other levels and districts.

Grants for gram panchayats with in a State will be distributed using the formula chosen by a state finance commission. In case the SFC formula is not available, then the share of each gram panchayat will be on the basis on 2011 population with a weight of 90 per cent and area with a weight of 10 per cent.

Municipalities

In the case of municipalities, the division between basic and performance grant will be on an 80:20 basis. The basic grant for urban local bodies will be divided into tier-wise shares and distributed across each tier, the municipal corporations, municipalities (the tier II urban local bodies) and the nagar panchayats (the tier III local bodies) using the formula given by a state finance commission. In case the SFC formula is not available for urban local bodies, shares of each of the three tiers will be on the basis of population of 2011 with a weight of 90 percent and area with a weight of 10 percent, and then distributed among the entities in each tier in proportion using same formula. local body are tender process are not transparent local body are tenderRule hard so some near people come in tender and

Performance Grants

The performance grants will be given from the second year or 2016 onwards. To be eligible for performance grants,

  • The local bodies and State government have to submit audited annual accounts that relate to a year not earlier than two years preceding the year in which the body seeks the performance grant.
  • They have to show an increase in the own revenues of the local body over the preceding year.
  • In case of urban local bodies, they have to measure and publish service level benchmarks for basic services.

The undisbursed amount should be distributed on an equitable basis among all the eligible local bodies for the performance grant in the State.

Empowering local bodies

State governments has to ensure that local bodies get revenue from all local sources.

  • Have to review existing rules to facilitate the levy of property tax and reassess properties by local bodies.
  • Have to strengthen SFC with timely constitution and administrative support.
  • Have to allow panchayats to levy of vacant land tax and land conversion charges.
  • Have to take steps to empower local bodies to impose advertisement tax.
  • Review entertainment tax and allow share to local urban bodies.
  • Share royalties from mining where the mine is located.
  • Allow local bodies to explore issuing the municipal bonds.

Fiscal plan

Devolution to special States

Good and Services Tax (GST)

The commission recommended the Union to establish GST compensation fund. This compensation is to be used to address 100% of the shortfall in the first year, 75% in the second year and 50% in the third year. This additional fiscal burden on the Union government has to be taken as investment to get yields in the medium and long run.

National Disaster Relief Fund

The financing of the NDRF had been from levying cess on some selected items and some of them will be subsumed by GST. The commission recommended the Union Government to ensure an assured source of funding. The commission recommended to consider tax exemption to private contributions to the NDRF.

The commission recommended to review the reimbursement of expenditure incurred by the defense forces to not hinder their efficiency during disaster relief.

The commission recommended the Union Government to expedite the development and scientific validation of the Hazard Vulnerability Risk Profiles of States.

The commission recommended to keep an aggregate corpus for all States of Rs. 61,219 crore for the five years based on the expenditure from the past years. The commission recommended all States to contribute 10 per cent and Union with the remaining 90 per cent. Considering the need for regard to state-specific disasters, the commission recommended that up to 10 per cent of the funds available under the SDRF can be used by States for natural disasters that they consider to be 'disasters' within the local context in the State and which are not included in the notified list of disasters of the Ministry of Home Affairs.

Public utilities

Power

The commission recommend3e that 100 per cent metering be achieved in a time-bound manner for all electricity consumers.

The Electricity Act, 2003, currently does not have any provision of penalties for delays in the payment of subsidies by State Governments. The commission recommended that the Act be suitably amended to facilitate levy of such penalties.

Electricity Act allows a State Electricity Regulatory Commission Fund by State Governments, to enable the SERCs to perform their responsibilities. The commission recommended all States to set up SERC Fund, as statutorily provided.

Transport

The commission recommended Rail Tariff Authority (RTA) to do expeditious replacement of the advisory body with a statutory body with needed amendments to the Railways Act, 1989.

The commission recommended accounting systems in the SRTUs to make explicit all forms of subsidy, the basis for determining the extent of subsidies, and also the extent of reimbursement by State Governments.

The commission recommended to set up independent regulators for the passenger road sector to help in tariff setting, regulation of service quality, and the collection and dissemination of sector information. SASAS

Water supply

The commission recommended all States to set up Water regulation authority (WRA) to set up pricing of water for domestic, irrigation and other uses. It recommended all States to invest in volumetric measurement of the use of irrigation water. It also recommended the States and local bodies to progressively move towards 100 per cent metering of water and to complete metering by 2017 with the cost to be borne by the consumers. The commission recommended to give new connections in urban bodies only when the functioning meters are set up.

Public sector companies

The commission recommended that a Financial Sector Public Enterprises Committee be appointed to examine and recommend parameters for appropriate future fiscal support to financial sector public enterprises, recognizing the regulatory needs and the multiplicity of units in each activity.

The commission recommended to categorize public sector companies as high, low and non priority to decide current policy and future course of action.

The commission recommended to wind up the National Investment Fund and to keep all the receipts from disinvestment to be kept with the Consolidated Fund of India.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of Grenada</span> National economy

The economy of Grenada is a largely tourism-based, small and open economy. Over the past two decades, the main thrust of Grenada's economy has shifted from agriculture to services, with tourism serving as the leading foreign currency earning sector. The country's principal export crops are the spices nutmeg and mace. Other crops for export include cocoa, citrus fruits, bananas, cloves, and cinnamon. Manufacturing industries in Grenada operate mostly on a small scale, including production of beverages and other foodstuffs, textiles, and the assembly of electronic components for export.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Government budget balance</span> Difference between revenues and spending

The government budget balance, also referred to as the general government balance, public budget balance, or public fiscal balance, is the difference between government revenues and spending. For a government that uses accrual accounting the budget balance is calculated using only spending on current operations, with expenditure on new capital assets excluded. A positive balance is called a government budget surplus, and a negative balance is a government budget deficit. A government budget presents the government's proposed revenues and spending for a financial year.

The Barnett formula is a mechanism used by the Treasury in the United Kingdom to automatically adjust the amounts of public expenditure allocated to Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales to reflect changes in spending levels allocated to public services in England, Scotland and Wales, as appropriate. The formula applies to a large proportion, but not the whole, of the devolved governments' budgets − in 2013–14 it applied to about 85% of the Scottish Parliament's total budget.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States federal budget</span> Budget of the U.S. federal government

The United States budget comprises the spending and revenues of the U.S. federal government. The budget is the financial representation of the priorities of the government, reflecting historical debates and competing economic philosophies. The government primarily spends on healthcare, retirement, and defense programs. The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office provides extensive analysis of the budget and its economic effects. It has reported that large budget deficits over the next 30 years are projected to drive federal debt held by the public to unprecedented levels—from 98 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) in 2020 to 195 percent by 2050.

A government budget is a projection of the government's revenues and expenditure for a particular period of time often referred to as a financial or fiscal year, which may or may not correspond with the calendar year. Government revenues mostly include taxes while expenditures consist of government spending. A government budget is prepared by the government or other political entity. In most parliamentary systems, the budget is presented to the legislature and often requires approval of the legislature. Through this budget, the government implements economic policy and realizes its program priorities. Once the budget is approved, the use of funds from individual chapters is in the hands of government ministries and other institutions. Revenues of the state budget consist mainly of taxes, customs duties, fees and other revenues. State budget expenditures cover the activities of the state, which are either given by law or the constitution. The budget in itself does not appropriate funds for government programs, hence need for additional legislative measures. The word budget comes from the Old French bougette.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Finance Commission</span> Agency in India

The Finance Commissions are commissions periodically constituted by the President of India under Article 280 of the Indian Constitution to define the financial relations between the central government of India and the individual state governments. The First Commission was established in 1951 under The Finance Commission Act, 1951. Fifteen Finance Commissions have been constituted since the promulgation of Indian Constitution in 1950. Individual commissions operate under the terms of reference which are different for every commission, and they define the terms of qualification, appointment and disqualification, the term, eligibility and powers of the Finance Commission. As per the constitution, the commission is appointed every five years and consists of a chairman and four other members.

The Indian government has, since war, subsidised many industries and products, from fuel to gas.

The Gadgil formula is named after Dhananjay Ramchandra Gadgil, a social scientist and the first critic of Indian planning. It was evolved in 1969 for determining the allocation of central assistance for state plans in India. Gadgil formula was adopted for distribution of plan assistance during Fourth and Fifth Five Year Plans.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act, 2003</span> Act of the Parliament of India

The Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act, 2003 (FRBMA) is an Act of the Parliament of India to institutionalize financial discipline, reduce India's fiscal deficit, improve macroeconomic management and the overall management of the public funds by moving towards a balanced budget and strengthen fiscal prudence. The main purpose was to eliminate revenue deficit of the country and bring down the fiscal deficit to a manageable 3% of the GDP by March 2008. However, due to the 2007 international financial crisis, the deadlines for the implementation of the targets in the act was initially postponed and subsequently suspended in 2009. In 2011, given the process of ongoing recovery, Economic Advisory Council publicly advised the Government of India to reconsider reinstating the provisions of the FRBMA. N. K. Singh is currently the Chairman of the review committee for Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act, 2003, under the Ministry of Finance (India), Government of India.

The Eleventh Finance Commission of India was appointed by the President on 3 July 1998 for the period 2000-2005.

The Twelfth Finance Commission of India was appointed on 1 November 2002 to make recommendations on the distribution of net proceeds of sharable taxes between union and states. The commission was headed by veteran economist of India, C. Rangarajan. The commission submitted its report on 30 November 2004 and covered the period from 2005-10.

Government Expenditure and Revenue Scotland (GERS) is an annual estimate of the level of public revenue raised in Scotland and the level of public spending for the residents of Scotland under current constitutional arrangements. It was first published in 1992, and yearly since 1995, with the exceptions of 2007 where there was no report due to a methodology review, and 2016 where there were two annual reports due to an acceleration of publishing timescale.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Government spending in the United Kingdom</span>

Central government spending in the United Kingdom, also called public expenditure, is the responsibility of the UK Government, the Scottish Government, the Welsh Government and the Northern Ireland Executive. In the budget for financial year 2019–20, proposed total government spending was £842 billion.

The Second Finance Commission of India was constituted by president Rajendra Prasad on 1 June 1956.

The Ninth Finance Commission of India was set up in June 1987 under the chairmanship of Mr. N.K.P Salve.

The Thirteenth Finance Commission of India was constituted by the President of India under the chairmanship of Vijay L. Kelkar on 13 November 2007.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fifteenth Finance Commission</span>

The Fifteenth Finance Commission is an Indian Finance Commission constituted in November 2017 and is to give recommendations for devolution of taxes and other fiscal matters for five fiscal years, commencing 2020-04-01. The commission's chairman is Nand Kishore Singh, a senior member of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) since March 2014, with its full-time members being Ajay Narayan Jha, Ashok Lahiri and Anoop Singh. In addition, the commission also has a part-time member in Ramesh Chand.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Taxation in Wales</span>

Taxation in Wales typically comprises payments to one or more of the three different levels of government: the UK government, the Welsh Government, and local government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Welsh fiscal balance</span> Gap between government spending in Wales and local tax revenue

From 1999 to 2022 Wales has had a negative fiscal balance, due to public spending in Wales exceeding tax revenue. For the 2018–19 fiscal year, the fiscal deficit was about 19.4 percent of Wales's estimated GDP, compared to 2 percent for the United Kingdom as a whole. All UK nations and regions except for East, South East England and London have a deficit. Wales' fiscal deficit per capita of £4,300 is the second highest of the economic regions, after the Northern Ireland fiscal deficit, which is nearly £5,000 per capita.

Old Pension Scheme (OPS) in India was abolished as a part of pension reforms by Union Government. Repealed from 1 January 2004, it had a defined-benefit (DB) pension of half the Last Pay Drawn (LPD) at the time of retirement along with components like Dearness Allowances (DA) etc. OPS was a unfunded pension scheme financed on a pay-as-you-go (PAYG) basis in which current revenues of the government funded the pension benefit for its retired employees. Old Pension Scheme was replaced by a restructured defined-contribution (DC) pension scheme called the National Pension System.

References

  1. Jagannathan, K. T. (24 February 2015). "All you need to know about Finance Commission". The Hindu . Retrieved 18 November 2017.

Magbook by Arihant 2017