Genetic isolate

Last updated


Geographic isolation or other factors that prevent reproduction have resulted in a population of organisms with a change in genetic diversity and ultimately leads to the genetic isolation of species. Genetic isolates form new species through an evolutionary process known as speciation. Today, all the species diversity present on earth is the product of genetic isolate and evolution. The current distribution of genetic differences and isolation within and among populations is also influenced by genetic processes, which can give significant input into evolution's basic principles. The resulting genetic diversity within a species' distribution range is frequently unequally distributed, and large disparities can occur at the series of ranges when population dispersion and isolation are critical for species survival. [1] The interrelationship of genetic drift, gene flow, and natural selection determines the level and dispersion of genetic differences between populations and among species assemblages. [2] Geographic and natural elements may likewise add to these cycles and further impact species' advanced examples of hereditary variety such as genetic differences that cause genetic isolation. [3] Genetic variations are often unequally distributed over a species' geographic distribution, with differences between populations at the geographic center and the range's extremities. [4] In general, significant gene flow occurs in core populations, resulting in genetic uniformity, whereas low gene flow, severe genetic drift, and diverse selection conditions occur in range periphery populations, resulting in enhanced genetic isolation and heterogeneity among populations. [5] Genetic differentiation resulted from genetic isolate occurs as significant alterations in genetic variations, such as fluctuations in allelic frequencies, that are accumulated in the populations over time with geographic regional boundaries. Significant genetic diversity can be detected towards the limits of a species' range, where population fragmentation and isolation are more likely to affect genetic processes. Fragmentation is the division of a large population into smaller, geographically separated habitats, resulting in genetic differences within and across groups is also the product of genetic isolate. [6] Regional splitting is produced by a variety of factors, including environmental processes that regularly change a species' indigenous distribution. [7] Additionally, human-caused environmental changes, such as deforestation, land degradation can result in fast changes in a species' distribution, resulting in population decrease, segmentation, and regional isolation . Consequently, communities became geographically and genetically isolated. [8]



Isolation, in combination with diminishing habitat quality and a limited population density, is likely to result in a population's collapse and ultimate demise and extinction. [9] Random mutation rate, drift, high rates of inbreeding, restricted gene flow, and regional extinction have all been shown to increase with isolation. Varying climatic conditions, such as particular geographic climatic changes, can potentially cause pressures, which can drastically change a species' genetic composition yielding differences through starkly different selection processes. [10] as well as lead to increased genetic isolation among populations on a landscape heterogeneity. [11] Environmental heterogeneity has historically been identified as a vital source of genetic variations and distinctions due to isolation, and several studies have found correlations between neutral genetic differences and ecological heterogeneity, and genetic isolation. The genetic isolation and different associations in regional heterogeneity could be cited as evidence of diversifying selection working across entire genomes, encompassing manifestly neutral genes, and can be used to predict long-term effects of environmental factors on genetic diversity and genetic isolation. [12]


Genetic isolation is population of organisms that has little genetic mixing with other organisms within the same species. This may result in speciation, but this is not necessarily the case. Genetic isolates may form new species in several ways:

Human influences on genetic isolates include restricted breeding of dogs, or a community living secluded away from others (such as Tristan da Cunha or Pitcairn Islands). Far larger and less secluded human genetic isolates are peoples like Sardinians or also the Finns, natives of Finland.

Genetic Isolation and the Giraffa camelopardalis

Genetic isolation can happen in a variety of different ways. There are many ongoing, current research projects evaluating how various species have diverged through the process of genetic isolation, the giraffe, Giraffa camelopardalis , being one example. Giraffes are recognized to have nine separate subspecies, each varying in their coloration and patterns. [13] After much research, it accepts that genetic isolation is at fault for allowing the G. Camelopardalis species to diverge. There are various ideas behind how genetic isolation has occurred within the giraffe species. Extant giraffe populations have been studying to make small-scale migratory movements based on the African climate's wet and dry seasons. [14] The feeding ecology of giraffes is highly researching. It has shown that giraffes will follow the growth patterns of the Acacia tree based upon seasonal change, changing giraffe locations from mountain ranges to desert ranges. [15] Though this is not evidence for current-day genetic isolation, it suggests evidence for past large-scale migrations that may have caused separation within the species, caused genetic isolation and led to the beginnings of the subspeciation of the giraffe population. Giraffes also tend to travel in loose social herds. However, these loose social herds have been researching to be base upon a non-random system. This non-random system follows a trend of kinship or the sharing of similar genes between individuals. These loose-social herds keep kin and familiar individuals within the same group, with only slight movements of individuals from the pack, only to return to the same group. [16] This is evidence for genetic isolation by interaction only between familiar individuals. This is the cause for interbreeding and the accumulation of specific alleles. These alleles could potentially code for pelage color and pattern within a population, causing differences between people and ultimately the subspeciation of the giraffe species. Geographic separation has also been studying to play a role in the genetic isolation of the giraffe. The mitochondrial DNA of the giraffe has been looking for mutations and loci substitutions between subspecies and suggests diversification around the Late Pleistocene, where geographic isolation was likely. [17] The giraffe is an excellent example of how genetic isolation can happen in some ways and lead to species diversification.

Allopatric Speciation

The giraffe, Giraffa camelopardalis , can represent the allopatric speciation that occurs due to the genetic isolation of a population. Several clades of giraffes show differentiation within their mitochondrial DNA, varying between regions throughout Africa. These differences date back to the middle of the Pleistocene epoch and coincide with genetic isolation due to climatic and geographical separations within the population, allowing for the evolution and subspeciation of the separate subspecies of giraffe and differences in their pelage. [18] In addition, When a species splits into two different groups that are isolated from one another, this is known as allopatric speciation (1). [19]

Genetic isolation and speciation

A genetic species is a collection of biologically compatible crossbreeding natural populations that are genetically distinct from genetically related populations. The Genetic species concept, in contrast to the biological species concept, emphasizes genetic isolation rather than reproductive separation. The finding of genetically separate but not reproductively isolated species advances our knowledge of biodiversity, speciation, and related issues, as well as organism evolution. Consider the evolution of two allopatric populations. Over lengthy periods, each group undergoes numerous substitutions, resulting in genetic differentiation and isolation. Would it be possible to transplant a divergent gene from one group into the genome of another? On this connected genetic background, it's simple to see the gene being reasonably successful. That's also easy to see how it wouldn't work out because they are now genetically isolated from one another. [20]

Genetic isolation by environment or distance

Strong gene flow across populations can help local adaptation by bringing new genetic variations for selection, but it can also impede adaptation by clogging up locally beneficial genes. The population size, genetic diversity, and the environment can all have an impact on the outcome. IBD (isolation by distance), wherein population growth rates and immigration numbers are inversely proportional to population distance, may correlate gene flow patterns with geographic distance. Gene flow may also follow patterns of isolation by habitat, with higher rates of gene flow among an increasingly common form. Moreover, gene flow may be greatest across areas that are dissimilar which is the typical genomic swamping situation. [21] When the population’s size is limited and individuals are subjected to strong selection, gene flow can boost population numbers, even if the phenotypes that arise are generally miss-adapted. This can lead to increases in genetic differences that lead to isolation, which can allow new adaptations to take hold and even enlarge a habitat zone. [22]

Genetic isolation in fragmented populations

The link between statistical genetic differences and population size has gotten little scientific attention, despite the fact that small populations have less genetic variation at marker loci. Researchers show that in smaller fragmented meta-population, both neutral and quantifiable genetic variation is reduced, and both drift and selection change is amplified. [23]

Genetic isolation in sympatric species

Adaptation to diverse positions climatic conditions could be a significant source of genetic differences and isolation among populations. Pleiotropic induced sexual selection between individuals of these genetically diverse populations can be induced by biological features selected in each habitat. This circumstance could make sympatric speciation easier. For example, successful host transitions in phytophagous insects provide some of the most compelling evidence for ecological diversification in sympatric speciation. [24]

Genetic isolate and the burden of genetic diversity

Species with enormous ecological amplitudes, on the whole, have a lot of genetic diversity. More specialized species with small ecological amplitude and frequency, on the other hand, have minimal genetic diversity. Inbreeding depressions may pose the greatest threat to species with moderate habitat demands and substantial genetic diversity. [25]

The Influence of dispersal and diet on patterns of genetic isolation

Gene flow across populations is commonly thought to be a key role in the evolution of both local adaptations and speciation. It is necessary to assess genetic separation by distance to determine the impacts of dispersal ability and food breadth on genetic population structure. Strong dispersers have a mild IBD (isolation by distance) because of the homogenizing effects of gene flow, whereas stationary species have limited gene flow, which permits nearly all populations to isolate. Genetic uniformity is achieved at small geographical scales in intermediate dispersers, whereas limited dispersal increases genetic variability across vast distances. IBD is also thought to rise with decreasing food breadth and no other pattern, putting the theory that specialization promotes speciation by affecting population genetically subdivision to the test. In studies of IBD, the number of populations is more essential than the number of multiple alleles per locus. [26]

Current patterns of genetic isolation on islands

Individuals from several vegetation types on the island are genetically connected, demonstrating that ecological and climatic factors have a role in determining gene flow configurations on a small island. Climatic differentiation, as a single factor is included as separate variability, provides to decreases in immigration and reproduction in as many species belongs to a wide range of herbs families and with variable amounts of evolutionary understanding. The genetic structure of species on an isolated island is influenced by a range of environmental variables, with some species being influenced by single contours and others being influenced by many species. Sister species and congenerics have various contributing elements to isolation within species. [27]


In most situations, highly specialized species are constrained to a small portion of the accessible environment, characterized by extremely isolated populations. [28] This ecological specialization and consequently geographical constraint of indigenous populations is frequently accompanied by a reduction in gene flow, resulting in small population sizes and genetic differentiation. As a result, due to genetic isolation, such species can only survive if they are suited to minimal genetic isolation. [29] [30] In the search for lethal genes, genetic isolates with a background of a small founding population, long-term isolation, and population bottlenecks are invaluable resources. Specific rare, monogenic disorders get enhanced, and families with numerous sick members become common enough to be employed in locus-identifying linkage analyses. Besides that, the vast majority of cases are caused by the same mutation, and diseased alleles expose linkage of disequilibrium with molecular markers over strong genetic distances, making disease locus recognition easier in small study samples with few individuals affected using a similarity search for a shared genotype. The presence of disequilibrium linkage in disease alleles enhances linkage analysis and aids in determining the precise position of disease locus on the genome sequence. [31]


Many species fall somewhere between generalist and specialist on the generalist specialist range. Such species generally exhibit moderate environmental specialization, being neither pure generalists nor pure specialists, resulting in fluid changes that must be subjective when categorizing species. Despite their considerable habitat specialization, environmentally transitional species generally do not exhibit the low genetic diversity seen in pure specialists, but instead, exhibit species-specific genetic differences on the scale with generalists. These taxa, on the other hand, are categorized as far more endangered as their degree of specialization would suggest. This scenario can be harmful in the progression of population decline and may be one of the promoters of extinction in this instance, owing to the genomic instability of populations and unpredictable aggregation of detrimental genes. [32]


Genetic isolation in the cyclic rodent Microtus avails

Microtus arvalis, a small-sized mouse with short dispersal ranges that achieves relatively high richness, has been used as a model to investigate the effects of roads on genetic diversity and organization in fragmented and competitive habitats. The species' remarkable colonization potential has been observed in recent decades., [33] making it particularly well suited to studying small mammal dispersion strategies over short periods. Furthermore, these mouse populations achieve high local abundances and may endure significant population fluctuations in a few years, with well-defined periods. [34] In comparison to what has been reported for other morphologically similar small mammals with more reasonably expected populations, this species' cyclic variation in population size makes it particularly fascinating to explore the possible sensitivity to road barriers. [35] In a system with considerable population size changes, the lowest population size experiences the highest amounts of genetic drift. As a result, demographic bottlenecks are likely to have a large impact on genetic isolations and variations, reducing variability within populations while increasing variance between them. The enormous population size and gene flow at the highest stages, on the other hand, may lessen the effects of drift and bottlenecks, however, it may take many generations for the species to achieve new equilibrium values. [36]

See also

Related Research Articles

Giraffe Tall African ungulate

The giraffe is a tall African mammal belonging to the genus Giraffa. Specifically, It is an even-toed ungulate. It is the tallest living terrestrial animal and the largest ruminant on Earth. Traditionally, giraffes were thought to be one species, Giraffa camelopardalis, with nine subspecies. Most recently, researchers proposed dividing giraffes into up to eight extant species due to new research into their mitochondrial and nuclear DNA, as well as morphological measurements. Seven other extinct species of Giraffa are known from the fossil record.

Speciation Evolutionary process by which populations evolve to become distinct species

Speciation is the evolutionary process by which populations evolve to become distinct species. The biologist Orator F. Cook coined the term in 1906 for cladogenesis, the splitting of lineages, as opposed to anagenesis, phyletic evolution within lineages. Charles Darwin was the first to describe the role of natural selection in speciation in his 1859 book On the Origin of Species. He also identified sexual selection as a likely mechanism, but found it problematic.

Gene flow Transfer of genetic variation from one population to another

In population genetics, gene flow is the transfer of genetic material from one population to another. If the rate of gene flow is high enough, then two populations will have equivalent allele frequencies and therefore can be considered a single effective population. It has been shown that it takes only "one migrant per generation" to prevent populations from diverging due to drift. Populations can diverge due to selection even when they are exchanging alleles, if the selection pressure is strong enough. Gene flow is an important mechanism for transferring genetic diversity among populations. Migrants change the distribution of genetic diversity among populations, by modifying allele frequencies. High rates of gene flow can reduce the genetic differentiation between the two groups, increasing homogeneity. For this reason, gene flow has been thought to constrain speciation and prevent range expansion by combining the gene pools of the groups, thus preventing the development of differences in genetic variation that would have led to differentiation and adaption. In some cases dispersal resulting in gene flow may also result in the addition of novel genetic variants under positive selection to the gene pool of a species or population

Allopatric speciation Speciation that occurs between geographically isolated populations

Allopatric speciation – also referred to as geographic speciation, vicariant speciation, or its earlier name the dumbbell model – is a mode of speciation that occurs when biological populations become geographically isolated from each other to an extent that prevents or interferes with gene flow.

Sympatric speciation Process through which new species evolve from a single ancestral species while inhabiting the same geographic region

Sympatric speciation is the evolution of a new species from a surviving ancestral species while both continue to inhabit the same geographic region. In evolutionary biology and biogeography, sympatric and sympatry are terms referring to organisms whose ranges overlap so that they occur together at least in some places. If these organisms are closely related, such a distribution may be the result of sympatric speciation. Etymologically, sympatry is derived from the Greek roots συν ("together") and πατρίς ("homeland"). The term was coined by Edward Bagnall Poulton in 1904, who explains the derivation.

Peripatric speciation Speciation in which a new species is formed from an isolated smaller peripheral population

Peripatric speciation is a mode of speciation in which a new species is formed from an isolated peripheral population. Since peripatric speciation resembles allopatric speciation, in that populations are isolated and prevented from exchanging genes, it can often be difficult to distinguish between them. Nevertheless, the primary characteristic of peripatric speciation proposes that one of the populations is much smaller than the other. The terms peripatric and peripatry are often used in biogeography, referring to organisms whose ranges are closely adjacent but do not overlap, being separated where these organisms do not occur—for example on an oceanic island compared to the mainland. Such organisms are usually closely related ; their distribution being the result of peripatric speciation.


In biology, two related species or populations are considered sympatric when they exist in the same geographic area and thus frequently encounter one another. An initially interbreeding population that splits into two or more distinct species sharing a common range exemplifies sympatric speciation. Such speciation may be a product of reproductive isolation – which prevents hybrid offspring from being viable or able to reproduce, thereby reducing gene flow – that results in genetic divergence. Sympatric speciation may, but need not, arise through secondary contact, which refers to speciation or divergence in allopatry followed by range expansions leading to an area of sympatry. Sympatric species or taxa in secondary contact may or may not interbreed.

Masai giraffe Species of giraffe

The Masai giraffe, also spelled Maasai giraffe, also called Kilimanjaro giraffe, is a subspecies or species of giraffe. It is native to East Africa. The Masai giraffe can be found in central and southern Kenya and in Tanzania. It has distinctive, irregular, jagged, star-like blotches that extend to the hooves. A median forehead lump is usually present in bulls.

Molecular ecology A field of evolutionary biology that applies molecular population genetics, molecular phylogenetics, and genomics to traditional ecological questions

Molecular ecology is a field of evolutionary biology that is concerned with applying molecular population genetics, molecular phylogenetics, and more recently genomics to traditional ecological questions. It is virtually synonymous with the field of "Ecological Genetics" as pioneered by Theodosius Dobzhansky, E. B. Ford, Godfrey M. Hewitt, and others. These fields are united in their attempt to study genetic-based questions "out in the field" as opposed to the laboratory. Molecular ecology is related to the field of conservation genetics.

Species complex Group of closely related similar organisms

In biology, a species complex is a group of closely related organisms that are so similar in appearance that the boundaries between them are often unclear. Terms that are sometimes used synonymously but have more precise meanings are cryptic species for two or more species hidden under one species name, sibling species for two cryptic species that are each other's closest relative, and species flock for a group of closely related species that live in the same habitat. As informal taxonomic ranks, species group, species aggregate, macrospecies, and superspecies are also in use.

In parapatric speciation, two subpopulations of a species evolve reproductive isolation from one another while continuing to exchange genes. This mode of speciation has three distinguishing characteristics: 1) mating occurs non-randomly, 2) gene flow occurs unequally, and 3) populations exist in either continuous or discontinuous geographic ranges. This distribution pattern may be the result of unequal dispersal, incomplete geographical barriers, or divergent expressions of behavior, among other things. Parapatric speciation predicts that hybrid zones will often exist at the junction between the two populations.

The mechanisms of reproductive isolation are a collection of evolutionary mechanisms, behaviors and physiological processes critical for speciation. They prevent members of different species from producing offspring, or ensure that any offspring are sterile. These barriers maintain the integrity of a species by reducing gene flow between related species.

Kordofan giraffe subspecies of giraffe

The Kordofan giraffe is a subspecies of giraffe found in northern Cameroon, southern Chad, Central African Republic and possibly western Sudan. Historically some confusion has existed over the exact range limit of this subspecies compared to the West African giraffe, with populations in e.g. northern Cameroon formerly assigned to the latter. Genetic work has also revealed that all "West African giraffe" in European zoos are in fact Kordofan giraffe. It has been suggested that the Nigerian giraffe's ancestor dispersed from East to North Africa during the Quaternary period and thereafter migrated to its current Sahel distribution in West Africa in response to the development of the Sahara desert. Compared to most other subspecies, the Kordofan giraffe is relatively small at 3.8 to 4.7 meters, with more irregular spots on the inner legs. Its English name is a reference to Kordofan in Sudan. There are around 2,000 individuals living in the wild.

Ecological speciation

Ecological speciation is a form of speciation arising from reproductive isolation that occurs due to an ecological factor that reduces or eliminates gene flow between two populations of a species. Ecological factors can include changes in the environmental conditions in which a species experiences, such as behavioral changes involving predation, predator avoidance, pollinator attraction, and foraging; as well as changes in mate choice due to sexual selection or communication systems. Ecologically-driven reproductive isolation under divergent natural selection leads to the formation of new species. This has been documented in many cases in nature and has been a major focus of research on speciation for the past few decades.

Southern giraffe

The southern giraffe, also known as two-horned giraffe, is a species of giraffe native to Southern Africa. However, the IUCN currently recognizes only one species of giraffe with nine subspecies.

Reinforcement (speciation) Process of increasing reproductive isolation

Reinforcement is a process of speciation where natural selection increases the reproductive isolation between two populations of species. This occurs as a result of selection acting against the production of hybrid individuals of low fitness. The idea was originally developed by Alfred Russel Wallace and is sometimes referred to as the Wallace effect. The modern concept of reinforcement originates from Theodosius Dobzhansky. He envisioned a species separated allopatrically, where during secondary contact the two populations mate, producing hybrids with lower fitness. Natural selection results from the hybrid's inability to produce viable offspring; thus members of one species who do not mate with members of the other have greater reproductive success. This favors the evolution of greater prezygotic isolation. Reinforcement is one of the few cases in which selection can favor an increase in prezygotic isolation, influencing the process of speciation directly. This aspect has been particularly appealing among evolutionary biologists.

History of speciation

The scientific study of speciation — how species evolve to become new species — began around the time of Charles Darwin in the middle of the 19th century. Many naturalists at the time recognized the relationship between biogeography and the evolution of species. The 20th century saw the growth of the field of speciation, with major contributors such as Ernst Mayr researching and documenting species' geographic patterns and relationships. The field grew in prominence with the modern evolutionary synthesis in the early part of that century. Since then, research on speciation has expanded immensely.

This glossary of evolutionary biology is a list of definitions of terms and concepts used in the study of evolutionary biology, population biology, speciation, and phylogenetics, as well as sub-disciplines and related fields. For additional terms from related glossaries, see Glossary of genetics, Glossary of ecology, and Glossary of biology.

Eukaryote hybrid genomes result from interspecific hybridization, where closely related species mate and produce offspring with admixed genomes. The advent of large-scale genomic sequencing has shown that hybridization is common, and that it may represent an important source of novel variation. Although most interspecific hybrids are sterile or less fit than their parents, some may survive and reproduce, enabling the transfer of adaptive variants across the species boundary, and even result in the formation of novel evolutionary lineages. There are two main variants of hybrid species genomes: allopolyploid, which have one full chromosome set from each parent species, and homoploid, which are a mosaic of the parent species genomes with no increase in chromosome number.

Allochronic speciation Speciation arising from change in breeding time

Allochronic speciation is a form of speciation arising from reproductive isolation that occurs due to a change in breeding time that reduces or eliminates gene flow between two populations of a species. The term allochrony is used to describe the general ecological phenomenon of the differences in phenology that arise between two or more species—speciation caused by allochrony is effectively allochronic speciation.


  1. Tóth, Endre Gy; Tremblay, Francine; Housset, Johann M.; Bergeron, Yves; Carcaillet, Christopher (2019-10-17). "Geographic isolation and climatic variability contribute to genetic differentiation in fragmented populations of the long-lived subalpine conifer Pinus cembra L. in the western Alps". BMC Evolutionary Biology. 19 (1): 190. doi:10.1186/s12862-019-1510-4. ISSN   1471-2148. PMC   6798344 . PMID   31623551.
  2. ECKERT, C. G.; SAMIS, K. E.; LOUGHEED, S. C. (March 2008). "Genetic variation across species' geographical ranges: the central–marginal hypothesis and beyond". Molecular Ecology. 17 (5): 1170–1188. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2007.03659.x. ISSN   0962-1083. PMID   18302683. S2CID   13746514.
  3. Marchelli, P; Gallo, L A (September 2001). "Genetic diversity and differentiation in a southern beech subjected to introgressive hybridization". Heredity. 87 (3): 284–293. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00882.x. ISSN   0018-067X. PMID   11737275. S2CID   22211025.
  4. Hampe, Arndt; Petit, Rémy J. (2005-03-07). "Conserving biodiversity under climate change: the rear edge matters". Ecology Letters. 8 (5): 461–467. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00739.x. ISSN   1461-023X. PMID   21352449.
  5. Brunet, Johanne; Larson-Rabin, Zachary; Stewart, Christy M. (June 2012). "The Distribution of Genetic Diversity Within and Among Populations of the Rocky Mountain Columbine: The Impact of Gene Flow, Pollinators, and Mating System". International Journal of Plant Sciences. 173 (5): 484–494. doi:10.1086/665263. ISSN   1058-5893. S2CID   84162712.
  6. Provan, Jim; Maggs, Christine A. (2011-05-18). "Unique genetic variation at a species' rear edge is under threat from global climate change". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 279 (1726): 39–47. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.0536. ISSN   0962-8452. PMC   3223643 . PMID   21593035.
  7. Hampe, Arndt; Petit, Rémy J. (2005-03-07). "Conserving biodiversity under climate change: the rear edge matters". Ecology Letters. 8 (5): 461–467. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00739.x. ISSN   1461-023X. PMID   21352449.
  8. Cheptou, Pierre-Olivier; Hargreaves, Anna L.; Bonte, Dries; Jacquemyn, Hans (2017-01-19). "Adaptation to fragmentation: evolutionary dynamics driven by human influences". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 372 (1712): 20160037. doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0037. ISSN   0962-8436. PMC   5182433 . PMID   27920382.
  9. Sterling, Ken A.; Reed, David H.; Noonan, Brice P.; Warren, Melvin L. (2012-03-28). "Genetic effects of habitat fragmentation and population isolation on Etheostoma raneyi (Percidae)". Conservation Genetics. 13 (3): 859–872. doi:10.1007/s10592-012-0335-0. ISSN   1566-0621. S2CID   14016133.
  10. Kreyling, Juergen; Buhk, Constanze; Backhaus, Sabrina; Hallinger, Martin; Huber, Gerhard; Huber, Lukas; Jentsch, Anke; Konnert, Monika; Thiel, Daniel; Wilmking, Martin; Beierkuhnlein, Carl (2014-02-07). "Local adaptations to frost in marginal and central populations of the dominant forest tree F agus sylvatica L . as affected by temperature and extreme drought in common garden experiments". Ecology and Evolution. 4 (5): 594–605. doi:10.1002/ece3.971. ISSN   2045-7758. PMC   4098140 . PMID   25035801.
  11. Bockelmann, A.-C.; Reusch, T. B. H.; Bijlsma, R.; Bakker, J. P. (February 2003). "Habitat differentiation vs. isolation-by-distance: the genetic population structure of Elymus athericus in European salt marshes". Molecular Ecology. 12 (2): 505–515. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.01706.x. ISSN   0962-1083. PMID   12535100. S2CID   23544230.
  12. Jiang, Xiao-Long; An, Miao; Zheng, Si-Si; Deng, Min; Su, Zhi-Hao (2017-12-27). "Geographical isolation and environmental heterogeneity contribute to the spatial genetic patterns of Quercus kerrii (Fagaceae)". Heredity. 120 (3): 219–233. doi:10.1038/s41437-017-0012-7. ISSN   0018-067X. PMC   5836588 . PMID   29279604.
  13. "Giraffe Subspecies". Giraffe Conservation Foundation. Retrieved 23 October 2014.
  14. Pellew, R (1984). "The feeding ecology of a selective browser, the giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis tippelskirchi". Journal of Zoology. 202: 57–81. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1984.tb04288.x.
  15. Fennessy, J (2009). "Home range and seasonal movements of Giraffa camelopardalis angolensis in the northern Namib Desert". African Journal of Ecology. 47 (3): 318–327. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2028.2008.00963.x.
  16. Bercovitch, F.B. (2013). "Herd composition, kinship and fission–fusion social dynamics among wild giraffe". African Journal of Ecology. 51 (2): 206–216. doi:10.1111/aje.12024.
  17. Hassanin, A (2007). "Mitochondrial DNA variability in Giraffa camelopardalis: consequences for taxonomy, phylogeography and conservation of giraffes in West and central Africa". Comptes Rendus Biologies. 330 (3): 265–274. doi:10.1016/j.crvi.2007.02.008. PMID   17434121.
  18. Brown, D. M.; Brenneman, R. A.; Koepfli, K. P.; Pollinger, J. P.; Milá, B.; Georgiadis, N. J.; Wayne, R. K. (2007). "Extensive population genetic structure in the giraffe". BMC Biology. 5 (1): 57. doi:10.1186/1741-7007-5-57. PMC   2254591 . PMID   18154651.
  19. Society, National Geographic (2011-01-21). "speciation". National Geographic Society. Retrieved 2021-09-24.
  20. Baker, Robert J.; Bradley, Robert D. (August 2006). "Speciation in Mammals and the Genetic Species Concept". Journal of Mammalogy. 87 (4): 643–662. doi:10.1644/06-mamm-f-038r2.1. ISSN   0022-2372. PMC   2771874 . PMID   19890476.
  21. Sexton, Jason P.; Hangartner, Sandra B.; Hoffmann, Ary A. (January 2014). "Genetic Isolation by Environment or Distance: Which Pattern of Gene Flow is Most Common?". Evolution. 68 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1111/evo.12258. PMID   24111567. S2CID   10975665.
  22. Holt, Robert D.; Gomulkiewicz, Richard (March 1997). "How Does Immigration Influence Local Adaptation? A Reexamination of a Familiar Paradigm". The American Naturalist. 149 (3): 563–572. doi:10.1086/286005. ISSN   0003-0147. S2CID   83733282.
  23. WILLI, Y.; VAN BUSKIRK, J.; SCHMID, B.; FISCHER, M. (March 2007). "Genetic isolation of fragmented populations is exacerbated by drift and selection". Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 20 (2): 534–542. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01263.x. ISSN   1010-061X. PMID   17305819. S2CID   1324102.
  24. Thomas, Yan; Bethenod, Marie-Thérèse; Pelozuelo, Laurent; Frérot, Brigitte; Bourguet, Denis (February 2003). "Genetic Isolation Between Two Sympatric Host-Plant Races of the European Corn Borer, Ostrinia Nubilalis Hubner I. Sex Pheromone, Moth Emergence Timing, and Parasitism". Evolution. 57 (2): 261–273. doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00261.x. ISSN   0014-3820. PMID   12683523. S2CID   221734366.
  25. Habel, Jan Christian; Schmitt, Thomas (March 2012). "The burden of genetic diversity". Biological Conservation. 147 (1): 270–274. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2011.11.028. ISSN   0006-3207.
  26. Peterson, Merrill A.; Denno, Robert F. (September 1998). "The Influence of Dispersal and Diet Breadth on Patterns of Genetic Isolation by Distance in Phytophagous Insects". The American Naturalist. 152 (3): 428–446. doi:10.1086/286180. ISSN   0003-0147. PMID   18811450. S2CID   3497508.
  27. Haider, Sylvia; Kueffer, Christoph; Edwards, Peter J.; Alexander, Jake M. (September 2012). "Genetically based differentiation in growth of multiple non-native plant species along a steep environmental gradient". Oecologia. 170 (1): 89–99. Bibcode:2012Oecol.170...89H. doi:10.1007/s00442-012-2291-2. ISSN   0029-8549. PMID   22434406. S2CID   6346092.
  28. Johansson, Per; Ehrlén, Johan (April 2003). "Influence of habitat quantity, quality and isolation on the distribution and abundance of two epiphytic lichens". Journal of Ecology. 91 (2): 213–221. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00755.x. ISSN   0022-0477.
  29. Kawamura, Kouichi; Kubota, Masashi; Furukawa, Miki; Harada, Yasushi (2007-01-05). "The genetic structure of endangered indigenous populations of the amago salmon, Oncorhynchus masou ishikawae, in Japan". Conservation Genetics. 8 (5): 1163–1176. doi:10.1007/s10592-006-9271-1. ISSN   1566-0621. S2CID   32130367.
  30. Besold, Joachim; Schmitt, Thomas; Tammaru, Toomas; Cassel-Lundhagen, Anna (November 2008). "Strong genetic impoverishment from the centre of distribution in southern Europe to peripheral Baltic and isolated Scandinavian populations of the pearly heath butterfly". Journal of Biogeography. 35 (11): 2090–2101. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2008.01939.x. ISSN   0305-0270.
  31. Peltonen, Leena (1999-10-01). "Positional Cloning of Disease Genes: Advantages of Genetic Isolates". Human Heredity. 50 (1): 66–75. doi:10.1159/000022892. ISSN   0001-5652. PMID   10545759. S2CID   25810192.
  32. Habel, Jan Christian; Schmitt, Thomas (March 2012). "The burden of genetic diversity". Biological Conservation. 147 (1): 270–274. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2011.11.028. ISSN   0006-3207.
  33. Luque-Larena, Juan J.; Mougeot, Francois; Viñuela, Javier; Jareño, Daniel; Arroyo, Leticia; Lambin, Xavier; Arroyo, Beatriz (August 2013). "Recent large-scale range expansion and outbreaks of the common vole (Microtus arvalis) in NW Spain". Basic and Applied Ecology. 14 (5): 432–441. doi:10.1016/j.baae.2013.04.006. ISSN   1439-1791.
  34. Gerlach, Gabriele; Musolf, Kerstin (2000-08-15). "Fragmentation of Landscape as a Cause for Genetic Subdivision in Bank Voles". Conservation Biology. 14 (4): 1066–1074. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98519.x. ISSN   0888-8892.
  35. Ascensão, Fernando; Mata, Cristina; Malo, Juan E.; Ruiz-Capillas, Pablo; Silva, Catarina; Silva, André P.; Santos-Reis, Margarida; Fernandes, Carlos (2016-03-15). "Disentangle the Causes of the Road Barrier Effect in Small Mammals through Genetic Patterns". PLOS ONE. 11 (3): e0151500. Bibcode:2016PLoSO..1151500A. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151500 . ISSN   1932-6203. PMC   4792435 . PMID   26978779.
  36. Parra, Guido J.; Cagnazzi, Daniele; Jedensjö, Maria; Ackermann, Corinne; Frere, Celine; Seddon, Jennifer; Nikolic, Natacha; Krützen, Michael (April 2018). "Low genetic diversity, limited gene flow and widespread genetic bottleneck effects in a threatened dolphin species, the Australian humpback dolphin". Biological Conservation. 220: 192–200. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2017.12.028. ISSN   0006-3207.