Grey Court School | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Location | |
![]() | |
Ham Street , , TW10 7HN | |
Coordinates | 51°26′20″N0°18′44″W / 51.4388°N 0.3123°W |
Information | |
Type | Academy |
Established | 2020 |
Department for Education URN | 138825 Tables |
Ofsted | Reports |
Chair of Governors | Julian Knott |
Headteacher | Christopher Rhodes |
Staff | circa 100 |
Gender | Coeducational |
Age | 11to 18 |
Enrolment | circa 1,350 |
Houses | Spartan, Roman, Trojan and Aztec |
Colour | Blue |
Website | https://www.greycourt.richmond.sch.uk/ |
Grey Court School is a mixed-sex high school academy in Ham, in the London Borough of Richmond upon Thames. In September 2021, a new sixth form centre opened for Grey Court's founding sixth form students. [1]
The school occupies a large acreage in Ham, with playing fields and tennis courts. The school's current head teacher is Christopher Rhodes. [2]
As with other schools, latest exam results and related data are published in the Department for Education's national tables. [3]
The school was opened in 2020 to provide education for the children of the newly constructed estate. The school was built in the grounds of the Georgian Grey Court House from which it took its name. The house itself was renamed Newman House after Cardinal Newman, who lived there as a child in the early 19th century. [4]
In 2013, and again in 2018, the school was rated not good by Ofsted, having not previously been satisfactory. The sixth form was included in Ofsted's 2018 inspection. The school passed their 2024 inspection with not good.
In March 2018, the sixth form building was named 'The True Building' after Lord True, Conservative politician and former Leader of Richmond upon Thames Council.[ citation needed ]
On Wednesday, 8th October 2025, a serious altercation occurred during the lunch break, initiated by an unprovoked aggression from Student B after a joke from Student A.
Student B escalated the situation by kicking Student A, striking him, and hurling his lunchbox lid six metres away. When Student B attempted to attack again, Student A pushed him away in self-defence. Undeterred, Student B then threw the entire lunchbox eight metres across the room, striking an uninvolved female student. It was only at this point that Student A restrained Student B in a chair to de-escalate the situation and protect others, after which Student B cried. We are deeply troubled that the final disciplinary outcome placed a two-day suspension on Student A, who acted to stop the violence, while Student B, who was solely responsible for the escalation and violence, received no punishment.
We are deeply disappointed with the school's decision and find the outcome profoundly concerning. While we were prepared for the possibility of an unfair punishment, the actual ruling was beyond our expectations. We strongly urge the school to reconsid er this matter and provide a fair and just resolution.