Hart E. Posen | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Occupation(s) | Academic, researcher, and business analyst |
Academic background | |
Education | B.Sc., Electrical Engineering Master of Business Administration (MBA) M.Sc., Managerial Science and Applied Economics Ph.D., Management |
Alma mater | University of Manitoba University of Western Ontario, Ivey School of Business University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School of Business |
Academic work | |
Institutions | University of Michigan (2005 - 2012) University of Wisconsin-Madison (2012-2023 ) Dartmouth College (2023- ) |
Hart E. Posen is an academic,researcher,and business analyst. He is a Professor of Strategy and Entrepreneurship at Dartmouth College,Tuck School of Business. [1]
Posen's research focuses on understanding how companies and entrepreneurs develop and leverage knowledge,capabilities,and innovation to secure competitive advantage and how technological change can erode such advantage. He is ranked among the "Top 10% of Authors" by the Social Science Research Network (SSRN). [2] He is an Associate Editor for the Strategic Management Journal , [3] and was previously Associate Editor for Management Science from 2014 to 2018. [4]
Posen received his Bachelor’s degree in Electrical Engineering at the University of Manitoba in 1988. He then enrolled at the University of Western Ontario,Ivey School of Business,and obtained his Master of Business Administration (MBA) in 2000. Following this,he moved to the United States,earning his M.Sc. degree in Managerial Science and Applied Economics in 2003,and a Ph.D. degree in Management in 2005,at the University of Pennsylvania,Wharton School of Business. [5]
Prior to receiving his Ph.D.,Posen spent over a decade as an entrepreneur in the technology and retail sectors. In 2005,he began his academic career as an Assistant Professor of Strategy at the University of Michigan,Ross School of Business. He served in this position until 2012,and subsequently joined the University of Wisconsin-Madison,School of Business as a Professor of Management and Human Resources,where from 2018 onward he held the Richard G. and Julie J. Diermeier Professorship in Business. Since 2023,he has been serving there as a Professor of Strategy and Entrepreneurship at Dartmouth College,Tuck School of Business. [1]
Posen has written over 30 articles. He has examined how collective intelligence emerges and evolves in organizations via processes of individual and organizational learning. A common theme in Posen’s research is the argument that viewing a phenomenon from a learning-theoretic lens may provide insights that traditional decision-centric approaches overlook. His research findings hold implications for strategic management,innovation,entrepreneurship,and public policy-making. [6]
Posen is best known for developing computational models of learning processes to understand issues of strategy,innovation,and entrepreneurship. He has developed and extended Multi-Armed Bandit models and NK Models to study processes of learning in organizations. [7]
In his work on entrepreneurship,he stated that "to understand why so many new ventures fail,we need to understand this process of learning over time. It starts with an idea and moves through phases,a pre-entry learning phase and a post-entry learning phase." [8] He demonstrated that while many of the challenges of entrepreneurship that lead to a high rate of failure,such as excess entry into the market and delayed exit from the market,which are commonly ascribed to behavioral biases may in fact be the result of the nature of entrepreneurial learning by unbiased entrepreneurs. He also considered how the design of decision-making by teams of entrepreneurs [9] and the design of the learning and experimentation process of new venture formation may be used to alleviate the challenges posed by behavioral biases. [10] In his 2005 study,he argued that even when entrepreneurial entry results in failure,the failed firms generate externalities that significantly and substantially reduce industry cost because surviving firms learn from their failed rivals. [11]
Posen has worked on understanding how and why some firms fail and other survive in the face of technological change. In 2016,he focused his studies on understanding why firms appear to differ in their capacity to adapt to technological change. He developed a computational model of individual-level learning in an organizational setting characterized by interdependence and ambiguity. He demonstrated how exploration policy in the formative period of routine development can influence a firm's capacity to adapt to change in maturity. [12] In 2012,Posen considered the popular wisdom that when technologies change,the firm must explore for new ways of doing things. He identifies conditions under which the firm’s best response to technological change is to continue to exploit the existing technology rather than explore in search of a new technology. [13]
Much of his work focuses on imitation as a critical learning process in firms and industries. In his paper titled "On the Strategic Accumulation of Intangible Assets",Posen presented a hypothesis which highlights that intangible assets are inherently inimitable because would-be imitators need to replicate the entire learning path to achieve the same resource position. He tested the contributions of the intangible asset stock in the context of the firm’s final good-production function,and also determined the extent to which that asset stock deters rival mobility in the pharmaceutical industry. In an attempt to reconcile resource accumulation theory with the counterfactual evidence,he concluded that the accumulation process itself is not an isolating mechanism. [14]
He has challenged the assumption that imitation always makes firms more similar. He identified learning mechanisms by which imitation may in fact be an important source of innovation. He examined "how an imitator's focus of attention during this post-imitation experiential learning process impacts performance heterogeneity." [15] In another study,he conducted a comparative analysis between benchmarking and the "copy-the-best" imitation strategy of copying a subset of the best-performing firm's practices. Results of the study indicated that benchmarking is more effective in heterogeneous environments,on the other hand,the "copy-the-best" strategy is superior in the context of homogeneous environments because firms are more likely to copy novel practices from rivals. [16]
Posen is frequently invited to lecture to audiences in North America,Europe,and Asia. His commentary on economic issues has appeared in various media outlets,including The Wall Street Journal,USA Today,New York Times,NPR National News,Marketplace,CNBC,and the BBC. Posen has also shared his perspectives and expertise regarding the challenges that the COVID-19 pandemic has posed to business. During the virtual series,The UW Now Livestream:Innovation in a Pandemic:How COVID-19 Will Change the Landscape of Business,he stated that "things like COVID-19,but other large disasters and even small things,create new problems to solve,they showcase old problems in a way that perhaps we hadn't thought of them before,and they also make possible new solutions to old problems." [17]
The word ‘dynamics’appears frequently in discussions and writing about strategy,and is used in two distinct,though equally important senses.
A strategic partnership is a relationship between two commercial enterprises,usually formalized by one or more business contracts. A strategic partnership will usually fall short of a legal partnership entity,agency,or corporate affiliate relationship. Strategic partnerships can take on various forms from shake hand agreements,contractual cooperation's all the way to equity alliances,either the formation of a joint venture or cross-holdings in each other.
Intrapreneurship is the act of behaving like an entrepreneur while working within a large organization. Intrapreneurship is known as the practice of a corporate management style that integrates risk-taking and innovation approaches,as well as the reward and motivational techniques,that are more traditionally thought of as being the province of entrepreneurship. Corporate entrepreneurship is a more general term referring to entrepreneurial actions taking place within an existing organization whereas Intrapreneurship refers to individual activities and behaviors.
The resource-based view (RBV) is a managerial framework used to determine the strategic resources a firm can exploit to achieve sustainable competitive advantage.
Computer simulation is a prominent method in organizational studies and strategic management. While there are many uses for computer simulation,most academics in the fields of strategic management and organizational studies have used computer simulation to understand how organizations or firms operate. More recently,however,researchers have also started to apply computer simulation to understand organizational behaviour at a more micro-level,focusing on individual and interpersonal cognition and behavior such as team working.
David John Teece is a New Zealand-born US-based organizational economist and the Professor in Global Business and director of the Tusher Center for the Management of Intellectual Capital at the Walter A. Haas School of Business at the University of California,Berkeley.
In organizational theory,dynamic capability is the capability of an organization to purposefully adapt an organization's resource base. The concept was defined by David Teece,Gary Pisano and Amy Shuen,in their 1997 paper Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management,as the firm’s ability to engage in adapting,integrating,and reconfiguring internal and external organizational skills,resources,and functional competences to match the requirements of a changing environment.
Competitive heterogeneity is a concept from strategic management that examines why industries do not converge on one best way of doing things. In the view of strategic management scholars,the microeconomics of production and competition combine to predict that industries will be composed of identical firms offering identical products at identical prices. Deeper analyses of this topic were taken up in industrial organization economics by crossover economics/strategic-management scholars such as Harold Demsetz and Michael Porter. Demsetz argued that better-managed firms would make better products than their competitors. Such firms would translate better products or lower prices into higher levels of demand,which would lead to revenue growth. These firms would then be larger than the more poorly managed competitors.
Knowledge entrepreneurship describes the ability to recognize or create an opportunity and take action aimed at realizing an innovative knowledge practice or product. Knowledge entrepreneurship is different from 'traditional' economic entrepreneurship in that it does not aim at the realization of monetary profit but focuses on opportunities to improve production (research) and knowledge rather than maximizing monetary profit. It has been argued that knowledge entrepreneurship is the most suitable form of entrepreneurship for not-for-profit educators,researchers and educational institutions.
The Strategic Management Society (SMS) is a professional society for the advancement of strategic management. The society consists of nearly 3,000 members representing various backgrounds and perspectives from more than eighty different countries. Membership is composed of academics,business practitioners,and consultants. The society has been credited with being a factor in the development of strategic management as a legitimate field of scholarly endeavor. The SMS publishes the Strategic Management Journal,Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal and the Global Strategy Journal.
Entrepreneurship is the creation or extraction of economic value in ways that generally entail beyond the minimal amount of risk,and potentially involving values besides simply economic ones.
Soumodip Sarkar is an economist and management scholar.
Ulrich Lichtenthaler is a German economist who is Professor of Management and Entrepreneurship at the International School of Management in Cologne. He held the Chair of Management and Organization at the University of Mannheim until March 2015.
Shaker A. Zahra is the Robert E. Buuck Chair of Entrepreneurship and professor of strategy and entrepreneurship,Carlson School of Management,University of Minnesota. He is also the academic director of the Gary S. Holmes Entrepreneurship Center.
Entrepreneurial orientation (EO) is a firm-level strategic orientation which captures an organization's strategy-making practices,managerial philosophies,and firm behaviors that are entrepreneurial in nature. Entrepreneurial orientation has become one of the most established and researched constructs in the entrepreneurship literature. A general commonality among past conceptualizations of EO is the inclusion of innovativeness,proactiveness,and risk-taking as core defining aspects or dimensions of the orientation. EO has been shown to be a strong predictor of firm performance with a meta-analysis of past research indicating a correlation in magnitude roughly equivalent to the prescription of taking sleeping pills and getting better sleep. Still,some research has argued that EO does not enhance the performance for all firms. Instead,EO can be argued not to be a simple performance enhancing attribute but rather enhancing if it is applied under the right circumstances of the firm. In some cases,EO can even be disadvantageous for firms,if the situation of the firm does not fit with applying EO. Different situations can be the environment that the firm is situated within or internal situations such as structure and strategy.
Jay B. Barney is an American professor in strategic management at the University of Utah.
The composition-based view (CBV) was recently developed by Luo and Child (2015). It is a new theory that explicates the growth of firms without the benefit of resource advantages,proprietary technology,or market power. The CBV complements some existing theories such as resource-based view (RBV),resource management view,and dynamic capability –to create novel insights into the survival of firms that do not possess such strategic assets as original technologies and brands. It emphasizes how ordinary firms with ordinary resources may generate extraordinary results through their creative use of open resources and unique integrating capabilities,resulting in an enhanced speed and a high price-value ratio that are well suited to large numbers of low- to mid-end mass market consumers. The CBV has been commented as “a new view with significant application”for emerging market firms and for small and medium sized enterprises in many countries. The view cautions though that composition-generated advantages are temporary in nature and that composition itself mandates special skills in distinctively identifying,leveraging,and combining open or existing resources inside and outside the firm.
Daniel A. Levinthal is a Reginald H. Jones Professor of Corporate Strategy at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. Levinthal is considered to be one of the most prominent management scholars. His pioneering work on organizational learning,complex systems,and innovation as search process have advanced understanding of organizational and industry evolution and received numerous international awards. His papers remain some of the highest cited papers in management and social sciences in general.
Giovanni Battista Dagnino is an Italian economist and academic. He is the Chair of Management and Professor of Digital Strategy at the Libera UniversitàMaria SS. Assunta University of Rome,where he is the Founding Director of the MSc Degree in Economics and Management.
Research Quotient (RQ) is a measure of companies' innovation capability introduced in the 2008 article,R&D Returns Causality:Absorptive Capacity or Organizational IQ. The measure was originally referred to as IQ (Innovation Quotient),but because IQ and innovation quotient were already in use commercially,it was referred to as RQ in subsequent work. The motivating argument in the 2008 article was that the main prescription from absorptive capacity —that the more a company spends on R&D,the greater its ability to absorb spillovers from rivals’R&D,seemed implausible. This is because the greater the R&D,the closer a company gets to the knowledge frontier,and accordingly,the less likely it can use spillovers. Instead,Knott proposed and found,it wasn't that spending more led to higher returns,it was that companies have inherently different returns (RQ),and those with higher RQ spend more.