Hexaemeron (Basil of Caesarea)

Last updated

The Hexaemeron of Basil of Caesarea (d. 379) is a fourth-century Greek commentary on the Genesis creation narrative (or a Hexaemeron ). It is the first known work in this genre by a Christian, following Jewish predecessors of the genre like Philo of Alexandria's De opificio mundi and a now lost work by Aristobulus of Alexandria. [1]

Contents

Basil's Hexaemeron was composed over the course of nine homilies on the topic of the six days of creation, moving line by line through Genesis 1:1–26. [2] His Hexaemeron originated as a lecture series that he delivered to the congregation of Caesarea Maritima over the course of three days in the year 378 AD. The audience was likely a group of "average" Christians, as opposed to fellow Christian intellectuals or a group that he would have considered to have been spiritually advanced. [3]

Influences

In his homilies on the Hexaemeron, Basil covers a wide variety of subjects: the preexistence of matter and eternity of the world, the purpose of the world, the contemplation of beings, composition of the four elements, movement of the stars, behavior of the creatures of the land, waters, and air, etc. Many, if not all of these, were already motifs among classical authors such as Plato, Aristotle, the Stoics, and so forth. [4] More recently, some have sought to focus on passing hints of influence by Plotinus as well, such as in Basil's use of the term sympatheia. [5] As for the zoological information contained in Basil's works, while it has typically been thought that this came from his reading of the works of Aristotle, a recent re-evaluation has argued that Basil drew on a wider variety of sources and that his principal source was the Halieutica of Oppian. [6] The genesis of Basil's knowledge of astronomy has also been studied and has been argued to have originated during his youth. [7]

Content

On the topic of the eternity of the world, Basil takes on these subjects include that the world is not eternal but is in fact created. With respect to the position that the Creator eternally coexisted alongside the creation, Basil says that this is not possible due to their fundamentally different nature (not to mention that, for Basil, could matter be in no way equal to God). Theologically, Basil argues that the wording of Genesis — that God "created" as opposed to "worked" or formed" — indicates an absolute beginning. Commenting on Genesis 1:2 and the question of whether the world was created ex nihilo as opposed to ex materia (from pre-existing matter), he defends creation ex nihilo. The description in the scripture of the world having been unformed, says Basil, is reasonable on the basis of the then-absence of elements such as vegetation. Basil rejects the doctrine, found among some philosophical schools such as Stoicism, of eternal return, that is, the periodic conflagration (destruction) and rebirth of the cosmos. All created beings have been planned ahead of time by God and are necessary within God's conceived plan, and the creation reflects back on and results in admiration on the Creator. [4] The cosmos itself, then, acts as a sign of God's existence [4] :

May He Who has given us intelligence to recognize in the smallest objects of creation the great wisdom of the Contriver make us find in great bodies a still higher idea of their Creator. However, compared with their Author, the sun and moon are but a fly and an ant. The whole universe cannot give us a right idea of the greatness of God; and it is only by signs, weak and slight in themselves, often by the help of the smallest insects and of the least plants, that we raise ourselves to Him.

Basil offered many architectural analogies for the cosmos, including an amphitheater where its participants are not merely spectators but "fellow combatants" (i.e. participants) and as a training ground for people to try and come to know God. [8]

Method of interpretation

Basil's Hexaemeron was composed over the course of nine homilies, and originated as a lecture series by Basil to the congregation of Caesarea Maritima over the course of three days in the year 378 AD. Basil was familiar with the allegorical mode of interpretation dominant at the Alexandrian school and the literal form of interpretation dominant at the Antiochene school. In his Hexaemeron, he sided with the literalist mode. For example, he wrote: "For me grass is grass; plant, fish, wild beast, domestic animal, I take all in the literal sense." [9] Basil was also in communication with Diodorus of Tarsus, a known polemicist against the Alexandrian school, with whom he may have exchanged ideas about the subject. Basil commented that allegorical interpretations result in excessive interpretations which become lavish with the meaning of the text, and as being often opposed to the plain or common sense reading of the text. However, Basil was not opposed in toto to the use of allegorical understandings of the text: instead, his primary issue was with excessive allegorization as opposed to the allegorical interpretations found in authors like Origen. One example he spoke of concerned the statement in Genesis 1:2 that the "Darkness upon the deep": Basil said that this passage had become the source of many myths such as the notion that the "Darkness" referred to represented an "evil power" or a "personification of evil". Basil also associated these forms of uncontrolled exegeses with heretical sects such as Manichaeans, Marcionites, and Valentinians. [10]

Reception

Due to its popularity, it was translated into numerous languages including Latin, Armenian, [11] Syriac, [12] Georgian, [13] and Arabic. [14] Later still, it was translated into Old Church Slavonic, indicating the continued interest in the work over long periods of time. [15] A translation into Coptic must have also existed. [2] Basil's brother, Gregory of Nyssa, produced his own text titled In Hexaemeron [16] and well as praised his Hexaemeron as being as admirable as the holy texts of Moses. As the first in a line of many Christians works in the genre of Hexaemeral literature, his led to many others producing their own Hexaemeron as well as imitations of his text. For example, another of his contemporaries, Ambrose, produced an imitation. Jerome mentions only three of Basil's works: his Hexaemeron, his De Spiritu Sancto , and his Contra Eunomium . The Latin translation inspired Augustine to produce his own Hexaemeron, and was quoted by Isidore of Seville, the Venerable Bede, and Thomas Aquinas. [17]

Translations

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Origen</span> Christian scholar, ascetic, and theologian (c. 185 – c. 253)

Origen of Alexandria, also known as Origen Adamantius, was an early Christian scholar, ascetic, and theologian who was born and spent the first half of his career in Alexandria. He was a prolific writer who wrote roughly 2,000 treatises in multiple branches of theology, including textual criticism, biblical exegesis and hermeneutics, homiletics, and spirituality. He was one of the most influential and controversial figures in early Christian theology, apologetics, and asceticism. He has been described as "the greatest genius the early church ever produced".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Basil of Caesarea</span> 4th-century Christian bishop, theologian, and saint

Basil of Caesarea, also called Saint Basil the Great, was an early Roman Christian prelate who served as Bishop of Caesarea in Cappadocia from 370 until his death in 378. He was an influential theologian who supported the Nicene Creed and opposed the heresies of the early Christian church, fighting against both Arianism and the followers of Apollinaris of Laodicea.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Biblical cosmology</span>

Biblical cosmology is the account of the universe and its laws in the Bible. The Bible was formed over many centuries, involving many authors, and reflects shifting patterns of religious belief; consequently, its cosmology is not always consistent. Nor do the biblical texts necessarily represent the beliefs of all Jews or Christians at the time they were put into writing: the majority of the texts making up the Hebrew Bible or Old Testament in particular represent the beliefs of only a small segment of the ancient Israelite community, the members of a late Judean religious tradition centered in Jerusalem and devoted to the exclusive worship of Yahweh.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jacob of Serugh</span> Syrian writer and bishop (c. 451–521)

Jacob of Serugh, also called Jacob of Sarug or Mar Jacob, was one of the foremost poets and theologians of the Syriac Christian tradition, second only to Ephrem the Syrian and equal to Narsai. He lived most of his life as an ecclesiastical official in Suruç, in modern-day Turkey. He became a bishop near the end of his life in 519. He was a Miaphysite, albeit moderate compared to his contemporaries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Genesis creation narrative</span> Creation myth of Judaism and Christianity

The Genesis creation narrative is the creation myth of both Judaism and Christianity, told in the Book of Genesis ch. 1–2. While the Jewish and Christian tradition is that the account is one comprehensive story modern scholars of biblical criticism identify the account as a composite work made up of two stories drawn from different sources.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Genesis 1:1</span> First verse of the first chapter of the Book of Genesis

Genesis 1:1 is the first verse of the first chapter of the Book of Genesis in the Hebrew and Christian Bibles and the opening of the Genesis creation narrative.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Firmament</span> Solid dome dividing the primal waters

In ancient near eastern cosmology, the firmament means a celestial barrier that separated the heavenly waters above from the Earth below. In biblical cosmology, the firmament is the vast solid dome created by God during the Genesis creation narrative to separate the primal sea into upper and lower portions so that the dry land could appear.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Allegorical interpretations of Genesis</span> Readings of the biblical Book of Genesis that treat elements of the narrative as symbols or types

Allegorical interpretations of Genesis are readings of the biblical Book of Genesis that treat elements of the narrative as symbols or types, rather than viewing them literally as recording historical events. Either way, Judaism and most sects of Christianity treat Genesis as canonical scripture, and believers generally regard it as having spiritual significance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hexaemeron</span> Genre of theological writing

The term Hexaemeron, literally "six days," is used in one of two senses. In one sense, it refers to the Genesis creation narrative spanning Genesis 1:1–2:3: corresponding to the creation of the light ; the sky ; the earth, seas, and vegetation ; the sun and moon ; animals of the air and sea ; and land animals and humans. God then rests from his work on the seventh day of creation, the Sabbath.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anastasius Sinaita</span> Abbot and theologian (died after 700)

Anastasius Sinaita, also called Anastasius of Sinai or Anastasius the Sinaite, was a Greek writer, priest and abbot of Saint Catherine's Monastery on Mount Sinai.

Antipater of Bostra was a Greek prelate who served as Metropolitan bishop of Bostra in the Roman province of Arabia and was one of the foremost critics of Origen. He lived in the 5th century AD.

Atticus was an ancient Platonic philosopher who lived in the second century of the Christian era, under the emperor Marcus Aurelius. His lifetime fell into the epoch of Middle Platonism, of which he was one of the most notable representatives.

Neoplatonism was a major influence on Christian theology throughout Late Antiquity and the Middle Ages in the East, and sometimes in the West as well. In the East, major Greek Fathers like Basil, Gregory of Nyssa and Gregory of Nazianzus were influenced by Platonism and Neoplatonism, but also Stoicism often leading towards asceticism and harsh treatment of the body, for example stylite asceticism. In the West, St. Augustine of Hippo was influenced by the early Neoplatonists Plotinus and Porphyry. Later on, in the East, the works of the Christian writer Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite, who was influenced by later Neoplatonists such as Proclus and Damascius, became a critical work on which Greek church fathers based their theology, like Maximus believing it was an original work of Dionysius the Areopagite.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Severian of Gabala</span>

Severian, Bishop of Gabala in Syria, was a popular preacher in Constantinople from around 400 until 404. He became the enemy of John Chrysostom and helped condemn him at the Synod of the Oak.

The De opificio mundi is a treatise on the Genesis creation narrative, composed by the Jewish philosopher Philo of Alexandria some time between 30 and 40 AD. It belongs to the Hexaemeral genre of literature, and is the first surviving example of it, though earlier, albeit lost Hexaemeral works, also existed. One such example by Aristobulus of Alexandria was an inspiration for Philo's own work.

The Hexaemeron of Jacob of Edessa is Jacob's commentary on the six days of creation of the Genesis creation narrative. Jacob worked on it in the first few years of the eighth century, as it was his final work. Unable to complete it within his own lifetime, the work was finished by his friend George, Bishop of the Arabs. It is an example of a work in the genre of Hexaemeral literature, but should not be confused with a similar earlier work, namely the Hexaemeron by Jacob of Serugh.

The Hexaemeron of Jacob of Serugh is a 6th-century text composed in the genre of Hexaemeral literature. As such, it offers a commentary on the Genesis creation narrative, and it is the first writing of this type to appear in the Syriac language. There was some precedent in the Commentary on Genesis by Ephrem the Syrian, but this was not a Hexaemeron. Likewise, there is no evident influence of a potential Syriac translation of the Hexaemeron of Basil of Caesarea on Jacob's work. Jacob dedicated a separate homily for each day of the creation week.

The De opificio mundi of John Philoponus was a 6th-century commentary on the Genesis creation narrative. The text is dated sometime between 546 and 560 AD. John, an advocate for Neoplatonism and a follower of the astronomy of Ptolemy, was interested in converging the six-day creation story with the philosophical theory of Aristotle and Plato from a Miaphysite point of view. He also wanted to integrate philosophical approaches with the more stringently literalistic interpretations of Basil of Caesarea.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cosmology in the ancient Near East</span>

Cosmology in the ancient Near East (ANE) refers to the plurality of cosmological beliefs in the Ancient Near East, covering the period from the 4th millennium BC to the formation of the Macedonian Empire by Alexander the Great in the second half of the 1st millennium BC. These beliefs include the Mesopotamian cosmologies from Babylonia, Sumer, and Akkad; the Levantine or West Semitic cosmologies from Ugarit and ancient Israel and Judah (the biblical cosmology); the Egyptian cosmology from Ancient Egypt; and the Anatolian cosmologies from the Hittites. This system of cosmology went on to have a profound influence on views in early Greek cosmology, later Jewish cosmology, patristic cosmology, and Islamic cosmology (including Quranic cosmology). Until the modern era, variations of ancient near eastern cosmology survived with Hellenistic cosmology as the main competing system.

Quranic cosmology is the understanding of the universe and its creation as described in the Quran. Quranic cosmology can be divided into the Quran's description of the physical landscape (cosmography) of the cosmos, including its structures and features, as well as its creation myth describing how the cosmos originated (cosmogony). The Quran's cosmology is theological, and is often related back to notions of the vastness and orderliness of the cosmos, as well as concepts of purpose, divine will, and the emphasis on the structuring of the world for the existence of human beings.

References

Citations

  1. ↑ Katsos 2023, p. 15–16.
  2. 1 2 Roberts 2019, p. 199–200.
  3. ↑ Lim 1990, p. 351, 361.
  4. 1 2 3 Kochańczyk-Bonińska 2016.
  5. ↑ Torchia 1996.
  6. ↑ Yam 2023.
  7. ↑ Yam 2022.
  8. ↑ Decharneux 2023, p. 24.
  9. ↑ De Beer 2015.
  10. ↑ Lim 1990.
  11. ↑ Thomson 2012.
  12. ↑ Thomson 1995.
  13. ↑ Mtchedlidze, Magda (2020-10-07). "The Biblical Quotations in the Old Georgian Translations of The Hexaemeron of Basil of Caesarea". PHASIS (23): 54–73. doi:10.48614/phasis.23.2020.54-73. ISSN   2346-8459.
  14. ↑ Roberts 2019.
  15. ↑ Gasper 2024, p. 177–176.
  16. ↑ DeMarco 2014.
  17. ↑ Kochańczyk-Bonińska 2016, p. 161–162.

Sources

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.