High Command Trial

Last updated
The High Command Trial
Walter-Warlimont.jpg
Walter Warlimont in the defendants' dock of the High Command Case at Nuremberg
Court Nuremberg
Full case name The United States of America vs. Wilhelm von Leeb, et al
Indictment 28 November 1947
Decided28 October 1948, Nuremberg

The High Command Trial (officially, The United States of America vs. Wilhelm von Leeb, et al.), also known initially as Case No. 12 (the 13 Generals' Trial), [1] and later as Case No. 72 (the German high command trial: Trial of Wilhelm von Leeb and thirteen others), [2] was the last of the twelve trials for war crimes the U.S. authorities held in their occupation zone of Germany in Nuremberg after the end of World War II. [3] These twelve trials were all held before U.S. military courts, not before the International Military Tribunal, but took place in the same rooms at the Palace of Justice. The twelve U.S. trials are collectively known as the "subsequent Nuremberg trials" or, more formally, as the "Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals" (NMT).

Contents

Background

High Command Trial courtroom High Command Trial courtroom.png
High Command Trial courtroom

The accused in this trial were high-ranking generals of the German Wehrmacht (including two field marshals of the Army, one field marshal of the air force and one general admiral), some of whom had been members of the High Command of Nazi Germany's military forces. They were charged with having participated in or planned or facilitated the execution of the numerous war crimes and atrocities committed in countries occupied by the German forces during the war.

The judges in this case, heard before Military Tribunal V-A, were the American John C. Young (presiding judge), Winfield B. Hale, and Justin W. Harding. The Chief of Counsel for the Prosecution was Telford Taylor. The indictment was filed on November 28, 1947; the trial lasted from December 30 that year until October 28, 1948.

Indictment

The accused faced four charges of having committed war crimes and crimes against humanity:

  1. Crimes against peace by waging aggressive war against other nations and violating international treaties.
  2. War crimes by being responsible for murder, ill-treatment and other crimes against prisoners of war and enemy belligerents.
  3. Crimes against humanity by participating or ordering the murder, torture, deportation, hostage-taking, etc. of civilians .
  4. Participating and organizing the formulations and execution of a common plan and conspiracy to commit aforementioned crimes.

All defendants were indicted on all counts and pleaded "not guilty". Count 4 of the indictment, the conspiracy charge, was soon dropped by the tribunal because it was already covered by the other charges. On count 1, the tribunal considered all of the accused not guilty and stated that they were not the policy-makers and that preparing for war and fighting a war 'on orders' was not a criminal offense under the applicable international law of the time.

Defendants and judgements

Of the 14 defendants indicted, Otto Schniewind and Hugo Sperrle were acquitted on all counts. Johannes Blaskowitz committed suicide during the trial and the 11 remaining defendants received prison sentences ranging from three years to lifetime imprisonment. All sentences included time already served in custody since 7 April 1945. The table below shows, with respect to each charge, whether the accused were either indicted but not convicted (I) or indicted and found guilty (G) and is listed by defendant, charge and outcome.

PhotosNameCountPenaltyNotes
1234
Bundesarchiv Bild 183-L08126, Wilhelm Ritter von Leeb.jpg Wilhelm von Leeb IIGITime servedFormer Generalfeldmarschall . Commander of Army Group North in the Soviet Union (June 1941 – January 1942). Convicted of transmitting the Barbarossa decree and its criminal application by subordinate units. [4] Released after trial as time served. [4] Died in 1956.
Hugo Sperrle, defendant in High Command Trial.jpg Hugo Sperrle IIIIAcquittedFormer Luftwaffe Generalfeldmarschall. Commanded Luftflotte 3 (February 1939 – August 1944). Died in 1953.
Bundesarchiv Bild 183-R63872, Georg von Kuchler.jpg Georg von Küchler IGGI20 yearsFormer Generalfeldmarschall. Commander of 18th Army on the Eastern Front, and later of Army Group North. While it was not discovered yet at the time of his trial, he had been directly involved in the murder of mentally disabled people. In December 1941, with Küchler's express consent, the SD shot 240 mental patients. [5] Sentence reviewed in 1951, commuted to 12 years. Released in 1953 on good time credit. [6] Died in 1968.
Bundesarchiv Bild 146-2004-004-05, Johannes Blaskowitz.jpg Johannes Blaskowitz Former Generaloberst . Commanded Army Group G and Army Group H in France and the Netherlands (1944–1945). Committed suicide during the trial on 5 February 1948. [7]
Hermann Hoth, defendant in High Command Trial.jpg Hermann Hoth IGGI15 yearsFormer Generaloberst. Commanded the 3rd Panzer Group during Operation Barbarossa in 1941, and the 4th Panzer Army during the Wehrmacht's 1942 summer offensive. [8] In support of the Commissar Order, issued a directive in November 1941 instructing his subordinate commanders to "immediately and pitilessly exterminate" "every sign of active or passive resistance (...) on the part of Jewish-Bolshevik agitators". [9] Sentence was reviewed with no changes in 1951. Released on parole in 1954; released from parole / sentence reduced to time served in 1957. Died in 1971. [10]
Hans Reinhardt - DPLA - f287ca56d252894b1f320387dfdb6451.jpg Georg-Hans Reinhardt IGGI15 yearsFormer Generaloberst. Troops under Reinhardt's command implemented the Commissar Order on the Eastern Front and also deported civilians to concentration camps. Sentence reviewed in 1951, with no changes. Released in 1952 on compassionate grounds. [6] Died in 1963.
Hans von Salmuth.jpg Hans von Salmuth IGGI20 yearsFormer Generaloberst. Salmuth implemented the Commissar Order, including murder and mistreatment of Soviet prisoners of war. He was also found guilty of murder, deportation, and hostage-taking of civilians. Sentence reviewed in 1951, commuted to 12 years and backdated to June 1945. Released in July 1953 on good time credit. [6] Died in 1962.
Karl Hollidt 238-OMT-XII-D-008 001.jpg Karl-Adolf Hollidt IGGI5 yearsFormer Generaloberst. Released on good time credit in December 1949. [7] Died in 1985.
Otto Schniewind, defendant in High Command Trial.jpg Otto Schniewind IIIIAcquittedFormer Generaladmiral. Fleet commander (Kriegsmarine) (June 1941 – July 1944). Died in 1964.
Karl von Roques at the Nuremberg Trials.jpg Karl von Roques IGGI20 yearsFormer General der Infanterie . As commander of the rear areas of Army Group South, Roques carried out extermination policies against Soviet partisans, and Slavic & Jewish civilians. Died in custody on 24 December 1949.
Hermann Reinecke, defendant in High Command Trial.jpg Hermann Reinecke IGGI Life imprisonment Former General der Infanterie. Head of the OKW's General Office of the Armed Forces, responsible for creation and implementation of the POW policy that resulted in the deaths of approx. 3.3 million Soviet prisoners of war. [11] Released in October 1954. Died in 1973.
Walter-Warlimont.jpg Walter Warlimont IGGI Life imprisonment Former General der Artillerie and Chief of the Department of National Defense in the OKW. Responsible for the Barbarossa decree which allowed the murder of civilians on the pretext of counteracting partisan activity. [11] Sentence commuted to 18 years in 1951. Released in June 1954. Died in 1976.
Otto Wohler, defendant in High Command Trial.jpg Otto Wöhler IGGI8 yearsFormer General der Infanterie. Convicted of implementing the Barbarossa decree, deportation of civilians for slave labor and cooperation with Einsatzgruppen. [12] Released in 1951. Died in 1987.
Rudolf Lehmann, defendant in High Command Trial.jpg Rudolf Lehmann IGGI7 yearsFormer Generaloberstabsrichter. Judge Advocate-General of the OKW and responsible for the Barbarossa decree which allowed the murder of civilians on the pretext of counteracting partisan activity [11] He drafted the December 1941 Night and Fog decree which removed access to due process from the accused. Wehrmacht troops applied the order in France, Holland, Ukraine, and other occupied countries. [13] Was involved in formulating the Commando Order and the Terror and Sabotage Decree. [12] Released in 1950 on good time credit. Died in 1955. [6]

Aftermath

The German public opinion was against the trial. Many denied the facts found by the U.S. judges, extolled the defense of obedience to superior orders and praised the soldierly qualities of the defendants. Particularly active were the Protestant and Catholic Churches. [14]

After the emergence of the Federal Republic, German Chancellor Konrad Adenauer and the Bundestag weighed in on the side of the defendants. German leverage increased as the urgency of rearming Germany grew. Under these intense pressures, in 1950, U.S. High Commissioner John McCloy established a review panel chaired by Judge David Peck of New York and, on its recommendation, reduced the sentences of three of the six High Command defendants who were still in prison. After further proceedings by mixed commissions composed of Allied and German members, the last of the High Command defendants returned home in 1954. [15]

See also

Notes

  1. Web Genocide Documentation Centre, Case No. 12 Archived 2012-04-01 at the Wayback Machine (the 13 Generals' trial); euRathlon, UWE Bristol.
  2. Web Genocide Documentation Centre, Case No. 72 Archived 2005-02-21 at the Wayback Machine (The German high command trial: Trial of Wilhelm von Leeb and thirteen others), UWE Bristol.
  3. There was also a "High Command Case" in the trial of the major war criminals before the International Military Tribunal. In that case, the German supreme command of the armed forces (OKWOberkommando Wehrmacht) was acquitted of the charge of having been a criminal organization.
  4. 1 2 Hebert 2010, p. 150.
  5. Hebert 2010, p. 95.
  6. 1 2 3 4 Hebert 2010, p. 218.
  7. 1 2 Hebert 2010, p. 219.
  8. Heiber 2004, p. 938.
  9. Burleigh 1997, p. 69.
  10. Hebert 2010, pp. 216–217.
  11. 1 2 3 Hebert 2010, p. 3.
  12. 1 2 Hebert 2010, p. 151.
  13. Hebert 2010, p. 90.
  14. Hebert 2010, pp. 185–186.
  15. See Detlev F. Vagts, Book Review, American Journal of International Law vol. 104 (2010), p. 548, at 549; reviewing Valerie Geneviève Hébert, Hitler's Generals on Trial: The Last War Crimes Tribunal at Nuremberg. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 2010.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuremberg trials</span> Series of military trials at the end of World War II

The Nuremberg trials were held by the Allies against representatives of the defeated Nazi Germany for plotting and carrying out invasions of other countries across Europe and atrocities against their citizens in World War II.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alfred Jodl</span> German general (1890–1946)

Alfred Josef Ferdinand Jodl was a German Generaloberst who served as the Chief of the Operations Staff of the Oberkommando der Wehrmacht – the German Armed Forces High Command – throughout World War II.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Doctors' Trial</span> Post-World War II trial of German doctors for war crimes

The Doctors' Trial was the first of 12 trials for war crimes of high-ranking German officials and industrialists that the United States authorities held in their occupation zone in Nuremberg, Germany, after the end of World War II. These trials were held before US military courts, not before the International Military Tribunal, but took place in the same rooms at the Palace of Justice. The trials are collectively known as the "subsequent Nuremberg trials", formally the "Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals" (NMT).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">International Military Tribunal for the Far East</span> Post–World War II war crimes trials

The International Military Tribunal for the Far East (IMTFE), also known as the Tokyo Trial and the Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal, was a military trial convened on 29 April 1946 to try leaders of the Empire of Japan for their crimes against peace, conventional war crimes, and crimes against humanity, leading up to and during the Second World War. The IMTFE was modeled after the International Military Tribunal (IMT) at Nuremberg, Germany, which prosecuted the leaders of Nazi Germany for their war crimes, crimes against peace, and crimes against humanity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wilhelm Ritter von Leeb</span> German field marshal (1876–1956)

Wilhelm Josef Franz Ritter von Leeb was a German Generalfeldmarschall of the Wehrmacht during the Second World War, who was subsequently convicted of war crimes. Leeb was a highly decorated officer in World War I and was awarded the Military Order of Max Joseph which granted him the title of nobility. During the Battle of France, he commanded Army Group C, responsible for the breakthrough of the Maginot Line.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Georg von Küchler</span> German general

Georg Carl Wilhelm Friedrich von Küchler was a German Generalfeldmarschall of the Wehrmacht during the Second World War, who was subsequently convicted of war crimes. He commanded the 18th Army and Army Group North during the Soviet-German war of 1941–1945.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Subsequent Nuremberg trials</span> 1946–1949 trials of Nazi leadership

The subsequent Nuremberg trials were twelve military tribunals for war crimes committed by the leaders of Nazi Germany (1933–1945). The Nuremberg Military Tribunals occurred after the Nuremberg trials, held by the International Military Tribunal, which concluded in October 1946. The subsequent Nuremberg trials were held by U.S. military courts and dealt with the cases of crimes against humanity committed by the business community of Nazi Germany, specifically the crimes of using slave labor and plundering occupied countries, and the war-crime cases of Wehrmacht officers who committed atrocities against Allied prisoners of war, partisans, and guerrillas.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Milch Trial</span> Second of the twelve trials at Nuremberg for war crimes committed by Nazi Germany

The Milch Trial was the second of the twelve trials for war crimes the U.S. authorities held in their occupation zone in Germany in Nuremberg after the end of World War II. These twelve trials were all held before U.S. military courts, not before the International Military Tribunal, but took place in the same rooms at the Palace of Justice. The twelve U.S. trials are collectively known as the "Subsequent Nuremberg Trials" or, more formally, as the "Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals" (NMT).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Krupp trial</span> Post WWII war crimes trial

The United States of America vs. Alfried Krupp, et al., commonly known as the Krupp trial, was the tenth of twelve trials for war crimes that U.S. authorities held in their occupation zone at Nuremberg, Germany, after the end of World War II. It concerned the forced labor enterprises of the Krupp Group and other crimes committed by the company.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pohl trial</span>

The Pohl trial against the Nazi German administration of the "Final Solution" was the fourth of the thirteen trials for war crimes that the United States authorities held in their occupation zone in Germany in Nuremberg after the end of World War II. The thirteen trials were all held before U.S. military courts, not before the International Military Tribunal, although both courts presided in the same rooms at the Palace of Justice. They are known collectively as the "Subsequent Nuremberg Trials" or more formally, as the "Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals" (NMT).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Flick trial</span> 1947 war crimes trial against German industrialist Friedrich Flick

The United States of America vs. Friedrich Flick, et al. or Flick trial was the fifth of twelve Nazi war crimes trials held by United States authorities in their occupation zone in Germany (Nuremberg) after World War II. It was the first of three trials of leading industrialists of Nazi Germany; the two others were the IG Farben Trial and the Krupp Trial.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">IG Farben Trial</span> Post-WWII war crimes trial

The United States of America vs. Carl Krauch, et al., also known as the IG Farben Trial, was the sixth of the twelve trials for war crimes the U.S. authorities held in their occupation zone in Germany (Nuremberg) after the end of World War II. IG Farben was the private German chemicals company allied with the Nazis that manufactured the Zyklon B gas used to commit genocide against millions of European Jews, Roma, homosexuals, socialists and other innocent civilians in the Holocaust.

<i>Einsatzgruppen</i> trial Ninth of the 12 trials for war crimes and crimes against humanity committed by the Nazis

The Einsatzgruppen trial was the ninth of the twelve trials for war crimes and crimes against humanity that the US authorities held in their occupation zone in Germany in Nuremberg after the end of World War II. These twelve trials were all held before US military courts, not before the International Military Tribunal. They took place in the same rooms at the Palace of Justice. The twelve US trials are collectively known as the "Subsequent Nuremberg trials" or, more formally, as the "Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals" (NMT).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hostages Trial</span> 1947–8 war crimes trial in Nuremberg, Germany

The Hostages Trial was held from 8 July 1947 until 19 February 1948 and was the seventh of the twelve trials for war crimes that United States authorities held in their occupation zone in Germany in Nuremberg after the end of World War II. These twelve trials were all held before US military courts, not before the International Military Tribunal, but took place in the same rooms at the Palace of Justice. The twelve US trials are collectively known as the "Subsequent Nuremberg Trials" or, more formally, as the "Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals" (NMT).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Command responsibility</span> Doctrine of hierarchical accountability

In the practice of international law, command responsibility is the legal doctrine of hierarchical accountability for war crimes, whereby a commanding officer (military) and a superior officer (civil) is legally responsible for the war crimes and the crimes against humanity committed by his subordinates; thus, a commanding officer always is accountable for the acts of commission and the acts of omission of his soldiers.

A war crimes trial is the trial of persons charged with criminal violation of the laws and customs of war and related principles of international law committed during armed conflict.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Superior orders</span> Criminal defense of following the orders of a superior

Superior orders, also known as just following orders or the Nuremberg defense, is a plea in a court of law that a person, whether civilian, military or police, can be considered guilty of committing crimes ordered by a superior officer or official. It is regarded as a complement to command responsibility.

Hans Laternser was a German lawyer who specialised in Anglo-Saxon law. In the immediate aftermath of the Second World War, that made him especially qualified to defend Germans prosecuted for war crimes by the Allied military tribunals, including the High Command Trial. He had represented several defendants at the Nuremberg Trials, such as former Field Marshals Albert Kesselring and Erich von Manstein.

<i>Hitlers Generals on Trial</i> 2010 book by Valerie Hébert

Hitler's Generals on Trial: The Last War Crimes Tribunal at Nuremberg is a 2010 book by Canadian historian Valerie Hébert dealing with the High Command Trial of 1947–1948. The book covers the criminal case against the defendants, all high-ranking officers of the armed forces of Nazi Germany, as well as the wider societal and historical implications of the trial. The book received generally positive reviews for its mastery of the subject and thorough assessment of the legacy of the trial.

References