Hindu rate of growth

Last updated
The Gross Domestic Product Per Capita (GDP Per Capita) Growth Rate: India had previously experienced periods of robust economic growth even prior to the 1991 reforms. Moreover, the growth rate has demonstrated a slowing trend since 2016, prior to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. GDP Per Capita Growth Rate India (World Bank data).png
The Gross Domestic Product Per Capita (GDP Per Capita) Growth Rate: India had previously experienced periods of robust economic growth even prior to the 1991 reforms. Moreover, the growth rate has demonstrated a slowing trend since 2016, prior to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The term "Hindu rate of growth" was coined by the Indian economist Raj Krishna in 1978. It refers to the annual growth rate of India's economy before the economic reforms of 1991, which averaged 4% from the 1950s to the 1980s. [1] Advocates of liberalisation often use this term. However, modern neoliberal economists criticise the term, as they believe that the low growth rate was caused by the failed five-year plan model and economic mismanagement. Many economists worldwide characterise the economic system after the 1990s as Dirigisme. [2] [3] Dirigiste policies often include indicative planning, state-directed investment, and the use of market instruments (taxes and subsidies) to incentivize market entities to fulfill state economic objectives.Eighth Five Year Plan (1992 - 1997) was for managing the transition from a centrally planned economy to market led economy through indicative planning.

Contents

India was a leader in the non-aligned movement and sought to maintain a neutral stance during the Cold War. As a result, it did not receive the same level of aid from the US and other Western countries as countries that were more closely aligned with the West. [4] [5] Economists critical of neoliberalism criticised the term as oversimplifying the complex economic, political, and social factors that contribute to a country's rate of growth, as well as the use of GDP Growth Rate as a metric for "progress". [6]

The economy of India accelerated and has grown at a rate of around 3–9% since economic liberalisation began in the 1990s with the exception of 2020. [7] [8] Recent research has shown that India's growth rate had begun to attain higher growth since Indira Gandhi's time in 1980s due to economic reforms, with average growth rate of 5.8% in 1981 to 1991. [9] GDP growth rate has however slowed since 2016. [10] In March 2023, Raghuram Rajan said that the growth rate in recent times was dangerously close to India's old Hindu rate of growth. [9]

The word "Hindu" in the term was used by some early economists like Vikas Mishra to imply that the Hindu outlook of fatalism and contentedness was responsible for the slow growth. [11] [12] Later liberal economists reject this connection and instead attribute the rate to the Indian government's protectionist and interventionist policies, rather than to a specific religion or to the attitude of some of the adherents of a particular religion. Accordingly, some neoliberal writers instead use the term "Nehruvian rate of growth". [13]

Term

The first time Hinduism was equated with economic growth was in February 1973, by B.P.R. Vithal, who wrote under a pseudonym, Najin Yanupi about India’s per capita growth rates: “This is the range within which alone the Hindu view of life will hold." [14] [15] The term was formally coined by Indian economist Raj Krishna. [16] [17] It suggests that the low growth rate of India, a country with mostly Hindu population was in a sharp contrast to high growth rates in other Asian countries, especially the East Asian Tigers, which were also newly independent. This meaning of the term, popularised by Robert McNamara,[ citation needed ] was used disparagingly and has connotations that refer to the supposed Hindu outlook of fatalism and contentedness. [18]

Economic system in India after Independence

India has never been a socialist country in the strict sense of the term. After independence in 1947, India adopted a mixed economy model, with elements of both socialism and capitalism. [19] It was seen as a way to achieve rapid industrialization and economic development, and to reduce the country's dependence on foreign capital and imports. [20] This approach, known as the "dirgitse model," involved state control of key industries, such as banking, insurance, and heavy industry, and the promotion of import substitution and self-reliance.

India abandoned its dirgitse model of economic development in the 1990s and adopted a more market-oriented approach, known as neoliberalism. The shift to neoliberalism in India was influenced by broader changes in the global economy, such as the dissolution of the Soviet Union [21] and the emergence of globalisation [22] as well as a condition of the IMF loan during 1991 Balance of Payments crisis, India was required to undertake economic reforms, including liberalization, deregulation, and privatization.

Comparison

In 1947, the average annual income in India was $439, compared with $619 for China, $770 for South Korea, and $936 for Taiwan. By 1999, the numbers were $1,818; $3,259; $13,317; and $15,720. [23]

YearIndiaChinaSouth KoreaTaiwan
1947$439$619$770$936
1999$1,818$3,259$13,317$15,720

India's growth rate was low by standards of developing countries. At the same time, Pakistan grew by 5%, Indonesia by 6%, Thailand by 7%, Taiwan by 8% and South Korea by 9%. [24]

Change in GDP per capita of India and its neighbours from 1947 to 2018 Maddison-data-gdp-per-capita-in-2011us-single-benchmark.svg
Change in GDP per capita of India and its neighbours from 1947 to 2018
GDP Per Capita for years 1950,1999,2018 [25]
YearIndiaPakistanChina
1950$987$1025$799
1999$2708$3112$4667
2018$6807$5510$13102

The comparison with South Korea was stark:

  1. In 1947, South Korean per capita income was less than 2 times bigger than India's.
  2. By 1960, South Korean per capita income was 4 times larger than India's
  3. By 1990, South Korean per capita income was 20 times larger. [26]

South Korea received much higher U.S aid and foreign investment when compared to India. [27] South Korea, similar to India was also forced to adopt IMF and World Bank imposed reforms during the 1997 Asian Financial crisis.

Comparing economic performance between India and South Korea is a complex task that requires consideration of historical, political, and economic contexts. While South Korea did adopt a neoliberal model of development, the government still played an active role in shaping and directing economic growth through targeted investments and support for key industries and companies. India, on the other hand, pursued a more mixed economy model with less external support.

China kept a significant part of its economy under state control even after reform and opening up despite receiving criticism from liberal institutions. [28] However, despite such policies Chinese economy grew at a much higher pace than India's, [25] overtaking Japan in 2010. [29]

Pakistan meanwhile, despite implementing liberal reforms under Pervez Musharraf experienced lower economic growth compared to India. [30]

Therefore, the economic performance of a country is influenced by a multitude of factors, and not solely determined by its GDP per capita. Factors such as bureaucracy, state control, and red tape are often cited as potential hindrances to economic development, but a simplistic view that reduces complex factors to simple buzzwords may fail to accurately capture the complete picture of a country's economic performance.

Criticism

Noted neoliberal politician and journalist Arun Shourie claimed that the "Hindu rate of growth" was a result of socialist policies implemented by governments:

because of those very socialist policies that their kind had swallowed and imposed on the country, our growth was held down to 3–4 per cent, it was dubbed — with much glee — as ‘the Hindu rate of growth’. [31]

According to economist Sanjeev Sanyal, the term was an attempt to suggest that "it was not Nehruvian economic policies that had failed India, it was India’s cultural moorings that had failed Nehru." He linked it with what he considered to be the ideological domination of the left, backed by the socialist regime, in post-Independence India. [32] However, Raj Krishna, who coined the term, was known as a right winger and opposed to Congress government. After the Indira Gandhi government was ousted in 1977, he became a member of the Planning Commission under the Janata Party government. [9]

The term is also seen by some as oversimplifying the complex economic, political, and social factors that contribute to a country's rate of growth. Economic growth is influenced by a wide range of factors such as education, infrastructure, political stability, and access to capital, among others. [6] It also neglects the progress in self-reliance that India had attained in metallurgical, mechanical, chemical, power and transport sectors. [9]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gross domestic product</span> Market value of goods and services produced within a country

Gross domestic product (GDP) is a monetary measure of the market value of all the final goods and services produced in a specific time period by a country or countries. GDP is most often used by the government of a single country to measure its economic health. Due to its complex and subjective nature, this measure is often revised before being considered a reliable indicator.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of the Republic of the Congo</span> National economy

The economy of the Republic of the Congo is a mixture of subsistence hunting and agriculture, an industrial sector based largely on petroleum extraction and support services. Government spending is characterized by budget problems and overstaffing. Petroleum has supplanted forestry as the mainstay of the economy, providing a major share of government revenues and exports. Nowadays the Republic of the Congo is increasingly converting natural gas to electricity rather than burning it, greatly improving energy prospects.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of Senegal</span> National economy

The economy of Senegal is driven by mining, construction, tourism, fishing and agriculture, which are the main sources of employment in rural areas, despite abundant natural resources in iron, zircon, gas, gold, phosphates, and numerous oil discoveries recently. Senegal's economy gains most of its foreign exchange from fish, phosphates, groundnuts, tourism, and services. As one of the dominant parts of the economy, the agricultural sector of Senegal is highly vulnerable to environmental conditions, such as variations in rainfall and climate change, and changes in world commodity prices.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economic growth</span> Measure of increase in market value of goods

Economic growth can be defined as the increase or improvement in the inflation-adjusted market value of the goods and services produced by an economy in a financial year. Statisticians conventionally measure such growth as the percent rate of increase in the real and nominal gross domestic product (GDP).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Four Asian Tigers</span> Economies of South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore and Hong Kong

The Four Asian Tigers are the developed East Asian economies of Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan. Between the early 1950s and 1990s, they underwent rapid industrialization and maintained exceptionally high growth rates of more than 7 percent a year.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kerala model</span> Developmental model adopted in Kerala

The Kerala model refers to the practices adopted by the Indian state of Kerala to further human development. It is characterised by results showing strong social indicators when compared to the rest of the country such as high literacy and life expectancy rates, highly improved access to healthcare, and low infant mortality and birth rates. Despite having a lower per capita income, the state is sometimes compared to developed countries. These achievements along with the factors responsible for such achievements have been considered characteristic results of the Kerala model. Academic literature discusses the primary factors underlying the success of the Kerala model as its decentralization efforts, the political mobilization of the poor, and the active involvement of civil society organizations in the planning and implementation of development policies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of Asia</span> Overview of the economy of Asia

The economy of Asia comprises about 4.7 billion people living in 50 different nations. Asia is the fastest growing economic region, as well as the largest continental economy by both GDP Nominal and PPP in the world. Moreover, Asia is the site of some of the world's longest modern economic booms, starting from the Japanese economic miracle (1950–1990), Miracle on the Han River (1961–1996) in South Korea, economic boom (1978–2013) in China, Tiger Cub Economies (1990–2020) in ASEAN, and economic boom in India (1991–present).

An emerging market is a market that has some characteristics of a developed market, but does not fully meet its standards. This includes markets that may become developed markets in the future or were in the past. The term "frontier market" is used for developing countries with smaller, riskier, or more illiquid capital markets than "emerging". As of 2006, the economies of China and India are considered to be the largest emerging markets. According to The Economist, many people find the term outdated, but no new term has gained traction. Emerging market hedge fund capital reached a record new level in the first quarter of 2011 of $121 billion. Emerging market economies’ share of global PPP-adjusted GDP has risen from 27 percent in 1960 to around 53 percent by 2013. The 10 largest emerging and developing economies by either nominal or PPP-adjusted GDP are 4 of the 5 BRICS countries along with Egypt, Indonesia, Mexico, South Korea, Saudi Arabia, Taiwan and Turkey.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">BRIC</span> Group of four emerging national economies

BRIC is a grouping acronym referring to the developing countries of Brazil, Russia, India, and China, which are identified as rising economic powers. It is typically rendered as "the BRIC", "the BRIC countries", "the BRIC economies", or alternatively as the "Big Four". The name has since been changed to BRICS after the addition of South Africa in 2010.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of India</span>

The economy of India has transitioned from a mixed planned economy to a mixed middle-income developing social market economy with notable public sector in strategic sectors. It is the world's fifth-largest economy by nominal GDP and the third-largest by purchasing power parity (PPP). According to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), on a per capita income basis, India ranked 139th by GDP (nominal) and 127th by GDP (PPP). From independence in 1947 until 1991, successive governments followed Soviet model and promoted protectionist economic policies, with extensive sovietization, state intervention, bureaucrat driven enterprises and economic regulation. This is characterised as dirigism, in the form of the Licence Raj. The end of the Cold War and an acute balance of payments crisis in 1991 led to the adoption of a broad economic liberalisation in India and indicative planning. Since the start of the 21st century, annual average GDP growth has been 6% to 7%. The economy of the Indian subcontinent was the largest in the world for most of recorded history up until the onset of colonialism in early 19th century. India accounts for 7.2% of global economy in 2022 in PPP terms, and around 3.4% in nominal terms in 2022.

From 1947 to 2017, the Indian economy was premised on the concept of planning. This was carried through the Five-Year Plans, developed, executed, and monitored by the Planning Commission (1951–2014) and the NITI Aayog (2015–2017). With the prime minister as the ex-officio chairman, the commission has a nominated deputy chairman, who holds the rank of a cabinet minister. Montek Singh Ahluwalia is the last deputy chairman of the commission. The Twelfth Plan completed its term in March 2017. Prior to the Fourth Plan, the allocation of state resources was based on schematic patterns rather than a transparent and objective mechanism, which led to the adoption for the Gadgil formula in 1969. Revised versions of the formula have been used since then to determine the allocation of central assistance for state plans. The new government led by Narendra Modi, elected in 2014, announced the dissolution of the Planning Commission, and its replacement by a think tank called the NITI Aayog.

The economic development in India followed socialist-inspired politicians for most of its independent history, including state-ownership of many sectors; India's per capita income increased at only around 1% annualised rate in the three decades after its independence. Since the mid-1980s, India has slowly opened up its markets through economic liberalisation. After more fundamental reforms since 1991 and their renewal in the 2000s, India has progressed towards a free market economy. The Indian economy is still performing well, with foreign investment and looser regulations driving significant growth in the country.

Income in India discusses the financial state in India. With rising economic growth and prosperity, India’s income is also rising rapidly. As an overview, India's per capita net national income or NNI was around 1.97 lakh rupees in 2022. The per-capita income is a crude indicator of the prosperity of a country. In contrast, the gross national income at constant prices stood at over 128 trillion rupees. The same year, GRI growth rate at constant prices was around 6.6 percent. While GNI and NNI are both indicators for a country's economic performance and welfare, the GNI is related to the GDP or the Gross Domestic Product plus the net receipts from abroad, including wages and salaries, property income, net taxes and subsidies receivable from abroad. On the other hand, the NNI of a country is equal to its GNI net of depreciation.

The economic liberalisation in India refers to the series of policy changes aimed at opening up the country's economy to the world, with the objective of making it more market-oriented and consumption-driven. The goal was to expand the role of private and foreign investment, which was seen as a means of achieving economic growth and development. Although some attempts at liberalisation were made in 1966 and the early 1980s, a more thorough liberalisation was initiated in 1991.

The 1991 Indian economic crisis was an economic crisis in India resulting from a balance of payments deficit due to excess reliance on imports and other external factors. India's economic problems started worsening in 1985 as imports swelled, leaving the country in a twin deficit: the Indian trade balance was in deficit at a time when the government was running on a huge fiscal deficit.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of Guangdong</span>

The Economy of Guangdong is one of the most prosperous in China. Guangdong is located in southern China, bordering on Fujian Province to the east, Hunan Province to the north, Guangxi Autonomous Region to the west and the special administrative regions of Hong Kong and Macau to the south. It is also the 1st economy of a sub-national entity in terms of GDP almost US$2.0 trillion in all of Asia and 3rd largest sub-national entity in the world.

The Mumbai Consensus is a term used to refer to India's particular model of economic development, with a "people-centric" approach to managing its economy which may be taken up by other developing nations in time. Indian model of economic growth, which relied on its domestic market more than exports, boosted domestic consumption rather than investment, pursued service-oriented industries rather than low-skilled manufacturing industries, has greatly differed from the typical Asian strategy of exporting labor-intensive, low-priced manufactured goods to the West. This model of economic development remains distinct from the Beijing Consensus with an export-led growth economy, and the Washington Consensus focused instead on encouraging the spread of democracy and free trade.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">MINT (economics)</span> Economies of Mexico, Indonesia, Nigeria and Turkey

MINT is an acronym referring to the economies of Mexico, Indonesia, Nigeria, and Turkey. The term was originally coined in 2014 by Fidelity Investments, a Boston-based asset management firm, and was popularized by Jim O'Neill of Goldman Sachs, who had created the term BRIC. The term is primarily used in the economic and financial spheres as well as in academia. Its usage has grown specially in the investment sector, where it is used to refer to the bonds issued by these governments. These four countries are also part of the "Next Eleven".

The economic de-industrialisation of India refers a period of reduction in industrial based activities within the Indian economy from 1757 to 1947. The process of de-industrialisation is an economic change in which employment in the manufacturing sector declines due to various economic or political reasons. The decline in employment in manufacturing is also followed by the fall in the share of manufacturing value added in GDP. The process of de-industrialisation can be due to development and growth in the economy and it can also occur due to political factors. In other words, the term de-industrialisation means a general reduction in the industrial capacity and came into prevalence in India with the decline and collapse of the handicrafts industry by external competition from British-manufactured products during the 19th century.

References

  1. ↑ Das, Gourab (2023-03-07). "Sure-footed India's economic potential outpaces 'ill-conceived' notion of Hindu rate of growth". The Economic Times.
  2. ↑ "The rusty frame of Indian state capitalism".
  3. ↑ "India's Far from Neo-liberal Economic Order in the Modi Era". 30 October 2020.
  4. ↑ "Net official development assistance received (current US$) - India | Data". data.worldbank.org. Retrieved 2023-01-05.
  5. ↑ "South Korea and Taiwan's institutional capacity helped U.S. aid to be used well after 1945, while South Vietnam's French colonial legacy hindered development. | USAPP". 21 October 2014. Retrieved 2023-01-05.
  6. 1 2 "When Did the 'Hindu' Rate of Growth End?". 2006-05-13.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  7. ↑ Subramanian, Arvind (2018-02-08). "India's Path From Crony Socialism to Stigmatized Capitalism | by Arvind Subramanian". Project Syndicate. Retrieved 2019-04-23.
  8. ↑ Derviş, Kemal (2018-02-12). "The Future of Economic Convergence | by Kemal Derviş". Project Syndicate. Retrieved 2019-04-23.
  9. 1 2 3 4 "ExplainSpeaking | Is India reverting to the Hindu rate of growth?". The Indian Express. 2023-03-06. Retrieved 2023-03-06.
  10. ↑ "GDP growth (annual %) - India | Data". data.worldbank.org. Retrieved 2022-01-31.
  11. ↑ Mishra, V. (1962). Hinduism and economic growth. Indian Branch, Oxford University Press.
  12. ↑ "The Hindutva Rate of Growth". casstt.com. Retrieved 2022-01-31.
  13. ↑ Chakravarty, Manas (November 17, 2014). "The Nehruvian rate of growth". Livemint. Retrieved May 2, 2017.
  14. ↑ Chikermane, Gautam. "Hinduphobia infects economics—again". Observer Research Foundation.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  15. ↑ Virmani, Arvind; Malhotra, Rajeev. "SHAPING OF THE INDIAN MIRACLE: Acceleration towards high growth" (PDF). EGROW Foundation.
  16. ↑ Indian Economy: Dutt & Sundaram
  17. ↑ "First Raj Krishna Memorial Lecture, 1995 : Economic Reforms for the Nineties" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-03-27. Retrieved 2023-08-19.
  18. ↑ Tripathi, Salil (June 13, 2006). "Escaping the 'Hindu rate of growth'". The Guardian. London. Retrieved May 4, 2010.
  19. ↑ Das Gupta, Chirashree. "State and Capital in Independent India: From Dirigisme to Neoliberalism" (PDF).
  20. ↑ Roffelsen, Cees (2016-09-25). "How Nehru Shaped India's Development". Medium. Retrieved 2023-01-04.
  21. ↑ Ahmed, Waquar (2010). "Neoliberalism, Corporations, and Power: Enron in India". Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 100 (3): 621–639. doi:10.1080/00045601003794965. ISSN   0004-5608. JSTOR   40863552. S2CID   153738284.
  22. ↑ "Finance and Development". Finance and Development | F&D. Retrieved 2023-01-04.
  23. ↑ Meghnad Desai (2003). "India and China: An essay in comparative political economy" (PDF). IMF.
  24. ↑ "Industry passing through phase of transition". The Tribune India.
  25. 1 2 "GDP per capita". Our World in Data. Retrieved 2022-01-31.
  26. ↑ "India: the economy". BBC. February 12, 1998.
  27. ↑ "From Aid to Trade: How South Korea is a Model for U.S. Foreign Assistance". USGLC. Retrieved 2022-01-31.
  28. ↑ "Explained, the role of China's state-owned companies". World Economic Forum. 7 May 2019. Retrieved 2022-01-31.
  29. ↑ Barboza, David (2010-08-16). "China Passes Japan as Second-Largest Economy". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2022-01-31.
  30. ↑ "GDP growth (annual %) - Pakistan | Data". data.worldbank.org. Retrieved 2022-01-31.
  31. ↑ "IndianExpress.com :: Hindutva and radical Islam: Where the twain do meet". Archived from the original on 2007-12-30. Retrieved 2008-01-02.
  32. ↑ Madhusudan, Harsh; Mantri, Rajeev. "Foreword". A New Idea of India: Individual Rights in a Civilisational State. Sanjeev Sanyal (Foreword). Westland.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.