IBM and the Seven Dwarfs

Last updated

In the history of computing, the term The Seven Dwarfs refers to a group of seven companies that competed with IBM during the 1960s and early 1970s. While IBM held a dominant market share (often referred to as "Snow White"), these seven competitors struggled to maintain a viable presence in the mainframe market against IBM. [1] [2]

Contents

The "Seven Dwarfs" era represented the height of the mainframe competition before the industry shifted toward minicomputers and personal computing.

Origins

CompanyEntered IndustryComputing DivisionProducts before digital computersFirst Significant Computer
UNIVAC (Remington Rand)19501950: Eckert–Mauchly Division & 1952: ERA DivisionTypewriters and programmed punched card calculators (prototyped 1950)
NCR19521953: Electronics DivisionCash registers and code-breaking machines [3] 102-D (via CRC's 102-A [4] )
Burroughs19531949: Electronic Instrument DivisionAdding machines and Electronic-Pulse Control Units (rack mountable Series 1000) [5] [6] [7]
RCA19531958: Electronic Data Processing DivisionVacuum tubes and Project Typhoon (Simulator) [10] BIZMAC
Honeywell19551957: Electronic Data Processing DivisionAutomatic controls DATAmatic 1000 (with Raytheon 1955–1957 via RAYDAC)
General Electric19561954: Computer DepartmentAnalog computers
Control Data (CDC)1957N/AN/A – Founded as a computer firm CDC 1604

Seed companies acquired by Dwarves

Computer Project promoted by the Director of Engineering at CEC, Clifford Berry (ABC Co-Inventor)
YearModel NameStatus/RoleHistorical Context
1951CEC 30-201Engineering PrototypeAn early development model built by the computer division of Consolidated Engineering Corporation. [13]
1952CEC 30-202Internal RefinementAn incremental model used for internal testing and further engineering development of the magnetic drum logic.
1953CEC 30-203First Commercial ModelThe refined design that became a marketable product.
1954Datatron 203Rebranded Production ModelAfter CEC's computer division was spun off as ElectroData Corporation, the machine was branded as the Datatron.
1955Datatron 204Commercial EDP ModelAddition of magnetic tape capability (Datafile Units) and improved card auxiliary storage.
1956Burroughs 205Acquired Final ModelBurroughs Corporation absorbed ElectroData in 1956. The system was updated with floating-point hardware and rebranded as the Burroughs 205 (or Datatron 205). [14]
Computer Project by the technical founders of the CRC company, who left Northrop Aircraft as a group
YearModelDescription & Significance
1950CRC 101Digital Differential Analyzer (DDA): A specialized computer for differential equations (like Northrop's MADDIDA). ~400 vacuum tubes.
1951CRC 102General-Purpose computer: An experimental system using ~200 vacuum tubes. Served as the engineering prototype for the 102A.
1953CRC 102A

(NCR CRC 102-A)

Scientific Computer: Acquired by NCR in 1953. A general-purpose machine using ~800 vacuum tubes and a magnetic drum (1,024 words).
1954NCR 102-DA version of the 102-A using Binary Coded Decimal (BCD) to process alphanumeric data and accounting tasks more efficiently.
1954CRC 105A variation of the DDA architecture designed for industrial engineering (utilizing decimal logic instead of binary). Decimal Digital Differential Analyzer (Lockheed's Mathematical Analysis Department) aerospace engineering simulations, solving equations related to aircraft stability and flight control.
1955CRC 106Optimized Fast-Converter of Input-Data: Used ~600 vacuum tubes for interpolation and data reduction (between instrument data-input and larger computers). WHITESAC (White Sands Automatic Computer) converted raw tracking and telemetry data into missile flight paths.
1955CRC 107

(NCR 107)

Featured "Three Address Location" instructions : An advanced machine using ~1,200 vacuum tubes, it focused on high-speed sorting and data reduction. Navy Logistics Computer (Inventory Control & Record Keeping) "Three-Address" instructions meant faster file processing and it managed 8 to 10 tape units simultaneously.
1955NCR 303Electronic Data Processor: A high-capacity system using ~1,100 vacuum tubes. Specialized for tape file handling and business EDP.
1959 NCR 304 Transistorized successor to the 303.

Industry consolidation and fates

The group was eventually reduced to the "BUNCH" after General Electric and RCA exited the industry. The following table details the fate of each "Dwarf" and their eventual resulting entities.

DwarfFateResulting Entity
Burroughs Merged with Sperry in 1986 Unisys
RCA Sold computer division to Sperry in 1971Exit from market
UNIVAC (Sperry)Merged with Burroughs in 1986Unisys
NCR Acquired by AT&T in 1991; later spun off NCR Voyix / NCR Atleos
Control Data (CDC) Split and sold in 1992 Ceridian / BT Group
Honeywell Sold computer division to Groupe Bull Honeywell / Atos
General Electric (GE)Sold computer division to Honeywell in 1970Exit from market


The Japanese connection: partners and competitors

During the 1960s and 70s, the Japanese Ministry of International Trade and Industry (MITI) encouraged domestic manufacturers to form strategic alliances with the American "Dwarfs" to acquire the technology necessary to compete with IBM. [15]

Strategic alliances with the "Dwarfs"

While IBM maintained a wholly-owned subsidiary in Japan (IBM Japan), the American Dwarfs entered the market through technology transfers and joint ventures with Japanese firms: [16]

The "non-aligned" exception: Fujitsu

Unlike its domestic rivals, Fujitsu famously declined a direct partnership with an American "Dwarf" during the initial 1960s boom. Instead, Fujitsu focused on domestic R&D via the FONTAC project. However, they later adopted a "compatible" strategy by investing in Amdahl Corporation (founded by former IBMer Gene Amdahl), which allowed Fujitsu to produce the world's first IBM-compatible mainframes.

RCA's European partners

The formation of the European Computer Manufacturers Association (ECMA) in 1961 was initiated by the chief executives of ICT, IBM (European division), and Bull. The key players involved in those initial organizational meetings were: [19]

  1. IBM — United States (the European division)
  2. Bull (Compagnie des Machines Bull) — France
  3. ICT (International Computers and Tabulators) — United Kingdom
  4. Ferranti — United Kingdom
  5. English Electric — United Kingdom
  6. AEI (Associated Electrical Industries) — United Kingdom
  7. Leo Computers — United Kingdom
  8. Elliott Brothers — United Kingdom
  9. Standard Telephones and Cables (STC) — United Kingdom
  10. Siemens — West Germany
  11. Zuse — West Germany
  12. Telefunken — West Germany
  13. Olivetti — Italy

In the late 1960s, the British government—acting through the Ministry of Technology (MinTech)—sought to consolidate the UK computer industry to create a viable competitor to IBM. This led to the formation of International Computers Limited (ICL) in 1968.

ICL's failure:

Transition to the BUNCH era

The transition from the Seven Dwarfs to the BUNCH occurred primarily because GE and RCA found the massive R&D costs required to compete with IBM's System/360 architecture unsustainable.

Following the 1971 exit of RCA—divesting its customer base and technology to Sperry Rand (UNIVAC). Effectively ending any future RCA-British collaborations like the English Electric System 4 derived from the RCA Spectra 70. The ICL pivoted from "mimicry" to "innovation" with the ICL 2900 Series.

The exit of GE (1970) and RCA (1971) caused a "shock" in the Japanese market, as their partners (Toshiba and Hitachi) were suddenly left without their primary technology sources. This led to the MITI-led reorganization of the Japanese industry into three groups to compete with IBM's System/370:

GroupCompaniesResulting SeriesArchitecture Influence
M GroupFujitsu / HitachiM SeriesIBM S/370 Compatible
A GroupNEC / ToshibaACOS SeriesHoneywell / GE / GCOS
C GroupMitsubishi / OkiCOSMO SeriesUNIVAC / Independent

Legacy

By the 1980s, the Japanese manufacturers had evolved from "junior partners" of the Dwarfs to become the primary global challengers to IBM, eventually acquiring several of their former mentors. [22] Notably, Fujitsu eventually acquired Amdahl and ICL, while NEC maintained a long-term partnership with Bull (the successor to Honeywell's computer interests).

See also

References

  1. "IBM Domination in the 60s & 70s" (PDF). Computer Science Department. Carnegie Mellon University School of Computer Science. p. 1.
  2. Usselman, Steven W. (1993). "IBM and its Imitators" (PDF). Business and Economic History. 22 (2): 4–5. By the mid fifties, IBM had secured approximately 85 percent of the domestic market, a share it would retain (if we treat personal computers as a separate entity) for the next three decades.
  3. Christensen, Chris (2014-04-03). "The National Cash Register Company Additive Recovery Machine" . Cryptologia. 38 (2): 152–177. doi:10.1080/01611194.2013.797050. ISSN   0161-1194. [Differencing machines] Non-carrying addition is a basic operation in modular arithmetic, and the inverse operation, which amounts to adding the additive inverse, is called differencing, so this device is otherwise called a differencing machine, or cryptanalytic differencing machine.
  4. "Department of Computing Science History" (PDF). University of Alberta. September 2023. [T]he NCR 102-A manufactured by the National Cash Register Company of Dayton, Ohio. It was originally referred to as the NCR CRC 102-A as it had been designed by the Computer Research Corporation. Sixteen 102-A computers were produced…
  5. Hoberg, G. G. (1951). "The Burroughs laboratory computer". Papers and discussions presented at the Dec. 10-12, 1951, joint AIEE-IRE computer conference: Review of electronic digital computers on - AIEE-IRE '51. pp. 22–29. doi: 10.1145/1434770.1434774 .
  6. Kent, A.; Williams, J. G.; Holzman, A. G. (1987), "Burroughs Corporation—Burroughs History", Encyclopedia of Computer Science and Technology, vol. 17, CRC Press, p. 23, ISBN   978-0-8247-2267-8, The first digital electronic computer built by the company was the Burroughs Laboratory Computer. …Two years later, Burroughs engineers delivered an enhanced version of this system, known as the Unitized Digital Electronic Computer (UDEC), to Wayne University in Detroit. Both were general purpose computers constructed of interconnecting series of "pulse-control units," similar to those used in the Whirlwind I Computer, developed at MIT in 1947.
  7. Rees, Mina (1952). "Digital Computers—Their Nature and Use". American Scientist. 40 (2): 328–335. JSTOR   27826436. I may mention also a rather interesting development at the Burroughs … of packaged pulse circuits, which had been developed originally by Project Whirlwind…
  8. Weik, Martin H. (1957). A Second Survey of Domestic Electronic Digital Computing Systems. Ballistic Research Laboratories. p. 318.
  9. Orden, Alex (1954). "Application of the Burroughs E101 computer" . Proceedings of the December 8-10, 1954, eastern joint computer conference: Design and application of small digital computers on - AIEE-IRE '54 (Eastern). pp. 50–54. doi:10.1145/1455270.1455281.
  10. Ware, Willis H. (2008). RAND and the Information Evolution: A History in Essays and Vignettes (PDF). Rand Corporation. p. 45. ISBN   978-0-8330-4513-3. [T]he U.S. Navy funded three major projects, all nicknamed after storms: Project Typhoon (analog) at the RCA Laboratories, Princeton, New Jersey; Project Cyclone (digital) at the Raytheon Company in Massachusetts; and Project Whirlwind (digital) at MIT.
  11. House, Robert W. (8 December 1953). "Reliability experience on the OARAC". Papers and Discussions Presented at the Dec. 8-10, 1953, Eastern Joint AIEE-IRE Computer Conference: Information Processing Systems---reliability and Requirements: 43–45. doi: 10.1145/1434878.1434889 .
  12. "ERMA Proposal ICB-1100101". www.smecc.org. Retrieved 2026-01-02.
  13. "MODEL 30-201 ELECTRONIC DIGITAL COMPUTER". ed-thelen.org. Retrieved 2026-01-16.
  14. Burroughs 205 Electronic Data Processing Systems Handbook: Central Computer (PDF). Bulletin 3021. Pasadena, California: Burroughs Corporation. 1957 [1956].
  15. Johnson, Chalmers (1982-06-01). MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925-1975. Stanford University Press. ISBN   978-0-8047-6560-2.
  16. Choi, Hyungsub (August 2008). "Technology Importation, Corporate Strategies, and the Rise of the Japanese Semiconductor Industry in the 1950s". Comparative Technology Transfer and Society. 6 (2): 103–126. doi:10.1353/ctt.0.0006.
  17. Takahashi, Shigeru (Spring 1996). "A Brief History of the Japanese Computer Industry before 1985". IEEE Annals of the History of Computing . 18 (1): 76. doi:10.1109/MAHC.1996.476569.
  18. Anchordoguy, Marie (1989). Computers Inc: Japan's Challenge to IBM. Harvard Univ Asia Center. pp. 116–117. ISBN   978-0-674-15630-2. NEC had collaborated with Honeywell since the early 1960s, and Toshiba, which had a technological agreement with GE, was thrust into Honeywell's arms when GE, withdrawing from computers, sold its computer division to Honeywell. …the alliance had 20 percent of the computer market; nevertheless, they faced stiff competition from the Fujitsu-Hitachi group and IBM Japan, both of which had a 30-percent share.
  19. Pinkerton, John M. M. (May 3, 1988). "Oral History Interview with John M. M. Pinkerton" (PDF). Charles Babbage Institute. Interviewed by William Aspray. University of Minnesota. [I]n about 1960 when there was a move to form the European Computer Manufacturers Association. The idea was promoted by three companies; namely, ICT, IBM and Bull, whose respective European chief executives wrote to all the other computer manufacturers in Europe -- there were about 16 of them at the time…
  20. Sandholtz, Wayne (1992). High-Tech Europe: The Politics of International Cooperation. University of California Press. ISBN   9780520073135. France torpedoed the only European collaborative initiative in computers...
  21. Zurstrassen, Anne-Sophie. "Unidata or the European IT Misunderstanding". EHNE - Digital Encyclopedia of European History. Retrieved 2026-01-01. When UNIDATA was officially dissolved in December 1975, the Germans felt betrayed.
  22. Siaroff, Alan; Lee, Clement (January 1997). "The State and Industrial Followers: Japanese Versus French Computer Strategy, 1960s–1980s". Journal of Public Policy. 17 (1): 31–61. doi:10.1017/S0143814X00003421. [Abstract] by the start of the 1980s it was clear that French policy had failed, whereas Japan was relatively successful.

Bibliography