Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network

Last updated
Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network
Formation2012;11 years ago (2012)
TypeNon-profit organization
Headquarters Paris, France
Website www.internetjurisdiction.net
Formerly called
Internet & Jurisdiction Project

The Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network, [1] also known as "I&J Policy Network", "Internet & Jurisdiction, or simply "I&J", is the multistakeholder organization fostering legal interoperability in cyberspace. [2] Its Secretariat facilitates a global policy process between key stakeholders to enable transnational cooperation and policy coherence. Participants in the Policy Network work together to preserve the cross-border nature of the Internet, protect human rights, fight abuses, and enable the global digital economy. [3] [4] [5] Since 2012, the Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network has engaged more than 300 key entities from different stakeholder groups around the world, including governments, the world's largest Internet companies, the technical community, civil society groups, leading universities and international organizations. [6]

Contents

The Secretariat of the Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network is based in Paris, France. It was founded in 2012 by Executive Director Bertrand de La Chapelle and Deputy Executive Director Paul Fehlinger. [7] [8]

Enabling multistakeholder cooperation

The Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network bridges relevant stakeholder groups and policy silos in order to enable transnational cooperation. It strives to fill the institutional gap in Internet governance at the intersection of digital economy, human rights, and cybersecurity. Through global, regional, and thematic meetings, [9] its Secretariat facilitates a neutral dialogue process with the mission of building trust among the different actors and help them develop the operational solutions necessary for the coexistence of diverse laws on the cross-border Internet.

The Internet & Jurisdiction Secretariat reports every year on progress at the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) organized by the United Nations. At the IGF 2016, The Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network was granted for the first time an "Open Forum", [10] a format traditionally reserved to treaty-based organizations. In June 2016 at the OECD Ministerial Meeting on the Digital Economy [11] in Cancún, Mexico, the Background Report Economic and Social Benefits of Internet Openness, cited the Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network's multistakeholder process as being exemplary: "The [Principles for Internet Policy Making of the 2011 OECD Council Recommendation] endorse the development of voluntary codes of conduct through multi-stakeholder processes, such as the Internet & Jurisdiction [Policy Network]." [12] In April 2018, the G7 Cyber Group expressed its support for the ongoing work of the Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network. [13] The organization was selected as one of 40 worldwide initiatives to be showcased with a dedicated session to the inaugural Paris Peace Forum on November 11–13, 2018, which was attended by over 70 heads of state. [14] The United Nations Secretary General Report on "Progress made in the implementation of and follow-up to the outcomes of the World Summit on the Information Society" referenced the work of the Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network and its 1st and 2nd Global Conferences in 2017 and 2019. [15] In 2020, the Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network was referenced by the Report of the UN Secretary-General's High-level Panel on Digital Cooperation, in the Chapter on Mechanisms for Global Digital Cooperation. [16] The Global Conferences of the Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network are institutionally supported by six international organizations: Council of Europe, European Commission, ICANN, OECD, UN ECLAC, and UNESCO. In 2018, the I&J Secretariat signed its first formal Memorandum of Understanding with an international organization, the United Nations ECLAC.

Programs of the Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network

The Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network's Programs foster policy coherence and develop concrete policy standards and operational solutions. Over 100 key stakeholders from all five continents are Members of their multistakeholder Contact Groups. [17] Outcomes of the Programs include operational norms, criteria and mechanisms, which are jointly developed by their Members.

Global Conferences of the Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network

The Global Conferences of the Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network are milestone meetings in which stakeholders take stock of the intersessional work and decide on common objectives and next steps for the policy development work. Stakeholder Plenary Sessions are held in the innovative heptagon seating format invented by the Secretariat of the Policy Network. They are organized in partnership with a host government, which were in the past France (2016), Canada (2018) and Germany (2019).

1st Global Conference of the Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network in Paris

The 1st Global Conference of the Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network took place on November 14–16, 2016 in Paris, France. [18] It was organized in partnership with the Government of France and institutionally supported by the OECD, the European Commission, UNESCO, the Council of Europe, the Slovak Presidency of the Council of the European Union, and ICANN. The French Ministry of Foreign Affairs provided its Ministerial Conference Center as the venue. It was the first time that more than 200 senior representatives from more than 40 countries from states, Internet companies, technical operators, civil society, academia and international organizations gathered to specifically address the issue of jurisdiction on the Internet. As The Economist reported: "If nothing is done, many who met [at the Global Conference of the Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network] in Paris worried, the open internet could be a thing of the past within a decade or two. What is needed, they said, is more international co-operation—but not of the old kind." [19] As an outcome, stakeholders identified concrete "areas for cooperation" to help the development of shared policy standards and frameworks for legal interoperability and due process across borders. The Global Internet and Jurisdiction Conference firmly placed the topic of jurisdiction on the Internet governance agenda, as recommended in the 2014 NETmundial Roadmap for the Future Evolution of Internet Governance Ecosystem. [20] The 1st Global Conference of the Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network was recognized by the 2017 United Nations Secretary-General's Report "Progress Made in the Implementation of and Follow-up to the Outcomes of the World Summit on the Information Society", [21] and the I&J Secretariat was invited to present outcomes to the G7 Cyber Group in March 2017 [22] and the G20 Multistakeholder Conference on the Digital Future in April 2017. [23]

2nd Global Conference of the Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network in Ottawa

The 2nd Global Conference of the Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network took place on February 26–28, 2018 in Ottawa, Canada. It was organized in partnership with the Government of Canada and institutionally supported by the OECD, the European Commission, UNESCO, the Council of Europe, and ICANN. Three multistakeholder Contact Groups were formed as an outcome of the first Global Conference in Paris for each of the three Programs of the Policy Network. They elaborated in 2017 so-called "Policy Options Documents". Based on these, the over 200 senior-level stakeholder from more than 40 countries defined common objectives to develop concrete solutions to pressing jurisdictional challenges on the internet and adopted the Ottawa Roadmap. [24] The Ottawa Roadmap established for the first time agreed Work Plans with structuring components for each Program of the Policy Network to advance towards policy coherence and joint action. Ahead of the 2nd Global Conference, co-founder of the internet Vint Cerf called in a Financial Times Op-Ed upon stakeholders that "the future of the cross-border internet depends on [its outcomes]". [25] Politico asked "The internet is broken. Can this group fix it?". [26] In April 2018, the Group of Seven (G7) Cyber Group expressed its support for the "continued multi-stakeholder work under the auspices of the Internet and Jurisdiction Policy Network, including most recently the Ottawa Road Map that came out of the 2nd Global Conference on Internet and Jurisdiction held in Ottawa in February 2018". [27] To implement the Ottawa Roadmap, 120 representatives from five continents, composed of Members from governments, companies, civil society and international organizations, work together in three Contact Groups (Data & Jurisdiction, Content & Jurisdiction, Domains & Jurisdiction) to develop proposals for policy standards and operational solutions.

3rd Global Conference of the Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network in Berlin

The 3rd Global Conference of the Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network took place on June 3–5, 2019 in Berlin, Germany. It gathered almost 300 senior level key stakeholders from more than 50 countries around the world. The Conference was organized in partnership with the Government of Germany, and institutionally supported by the Council of Europe, European Commission, ICANN, OECD, UN ECLAC, and UNESCO. The Conference discussed the operational Norms, Criteria and Mechanisms, developed in each Program of the Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network, to address some of the most pressing cross-border legal challenges of the digital 21st century, [28] and resulted in the Berlin Roadmap [29] to structure the further work on outcomes.

I&J Global and Regional Status Reports

I&J Status Reports survey key stakeholders to track global and regional trends, actors and solutions. They help foster policy coherence and legal interoperability in cyberspace. The Secretariat of the Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network launched the world's first Internet & Jurisdiction Global Status Report [30] at the United Nations Internet Governance Forum on November 27, 2019, during a Special Session. It presents a first-of-its-kind mapping of internet jurisdiction related policy trends, actors and initiatives. [31] The Report combines detailed desk research with a global data collection from over 150 key stakeholders – states, internet companies, technical operators, civil society, academia and international organizations from five continents. In 2020, the Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network launches the first regional Status Report for Latin America and the Caribbean in partnership with United Nations ECLAC. [32]

I&J Retrospect Database

To enable evidence-based policy innovation, Internet & Jurisdiction created in 2012 the open access, indexed and searchable I&J Retrospect Database. [33] By 2020, it contains almost 2000 cases from more than 120 countries that document the tensions between the cross-border Internet and national jurisdictions. [34] It is a leading resource that allows stakeholders to better understand global trends.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">International Telecommunication Union</span> Specialized agency of the United Nations

The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is a specialized agency of the United Nations responsible for many matters related to information and communication technologies. It was established on 17 May 1865 as the International Telegraph Union, significantly predating the UN and making it the oldest UN agency. Doreen Bogdan-Martin is the Secretary-General of ITU, the first woman to serve as its head.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">ICANN</span> American nonprofit organization that coordinates several Internet address databases

The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers is an American multistakeholder group and nonprofit organization responsible for coordinating the maintenance and procedures of several databases related to the namespaces and numerical spaces of the Internet, ensuring the network's stable and secure operation. ICANN performs the actual technical maintenance work of the Central Internet Address pools and DNS root zone registries pursuant to the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) function contract. The contract regarding the IANA stewardship functions between ICANN and the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) of the United States Department of Commerce ended on October 1, 2016, formally transitioning the functions to the global multistakeholder community.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet Assigned Numbers Authority</span> Standards organization overseeing IP addresses

The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) is a standards organization that oversees global IP address allocation, autonomous system number allocation, root zone management in the Domain Name System (DNS), media types, and other Internet Protocol–related symbols and Internet numbers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">World Summit on the Information Society</span>

The World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) was a two-phase United Nations-sponsored summit on information, communication and, in broad terms, the information society that took place in 2003 in Geneva and in 2005 in Tunis. WSIS Forums have taken place periodically since then. One of the Summit's chief aims is to bridge the global digital divide separating rich countries from poor countries by increasing internet accessibility in the developing world. The conferences established 17 May as World Information Society Day.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United Nations Information and Communication Technologies Task Force</span> Multi-stakeholder initiative associated with the United Nations

The United Nations Information and Communication Technologies Task Force was a multi-stakeholder initiative associated with the United Nations which is "intended to lend a truly global dimension to the multitude of efforts to bridge the global digital divide, foster digital opportunity and thus firmly put ICT at the service of development for all".

Technology governance means the governance, i.e., the steering between the different sectors—state, business, and NGOs—of the development of technology. It is the idea of governance within technology and its use, as well as the practices behind them. The concept is based on the notion of innovation and of techno-economic paradigm shifts according to the theories by scholars such as Joseph A. Schumpeter, Christopher Freeman, and Carlota Perez.

The Working Group on Internet Governance (WGIG) was a United Nations multistakeholder Working group initiated after the 2003 World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) first phase Summit in Geneva failed to agree on the future of Internet governance. The first phase of World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) agreed to continue the dialogue on Internet Governance in the Declaration of Principles and Action Plan adopted on 12 December 2003, to prepare for a decision at the second phase of the WSIS in Tunis during November 2005. In this regard, the first phase of the Summit requested the United Nations Secretary-General to establish a Working Group on Internet Governance (WGIG).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet governance</span> System of laws, norms, rules, policies and practices

Internet governance consists of a system of laws, rules, policies and practices that dictate how its board members manage and oversee the affairs of any internet related-regulatory body. This article describes how the Internet was and is currently governed, some inherent controversies, and ongoing debates regarding how and why the Internet should or should not be governed in future.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet Governance Forum</span>

The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) is a multistakeholder governance group for policy dialogue on issues of Internet governance. It brings together all stakeholders in the Internet governance debate, whether they represent governments, the private sector or civil society, including the technical and academic community, on an equal basis and through an open and inclusive process. The establishment of the IGF was formally announced by the United Nations Secretary-General in July 2006. It was first convened in October–November 2006 and has held an annual meeting since then.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bill Woodcock</span> Internet infrastructure pioneer

Bill Woodcock is the executive director of Packet Clearing House, the international organization responsible for providing operational support and security to critical Internet infrastructure, including Internet exchange points and the core of the domain name system; the chairman of the Foundation Council of Quad9; the president of WoodyNet; and the CEO of EcoTruc and EcoRace, companies developing electric vehicle technology for work and motorsport. Bill founded one of the earliest Internet service providers, and is best known for his 1989 development of the anycast routing technique that is now ubiquitous in Internet content distribution networks and the domain name system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Global Reporting Initiative</span> International standards organization

The Global Reporting Initiative is an international independent standards organization that helps businesses, governments, and other organizations understand and communicate their impacts on issues such as climate change, human rights, and corruption.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jeff Moss (hacker)</span> American computer security expert

Jeff Moss, also known as Dark Tangent, is an American hacker, computer and internet security expert who founded the Black Hat and DEF CON computer security conferences.

Multistakeholder governance is a practice of governance that employs bringing multiple stakeholders together to participate in dialogue, decision making, and implementation of responses to jointly perceived problems. The principle behind such a structure is that if enough input is provided by multiple types of actors involved in a question, the eventual consensual decision gains more legitimacy, and can be more effectively implemented than a traditional state-based response. While the evolution of multistakeholder governance is occurring principally at the international level, public-private partnerships (PPPs) are domestic analogues.

The NETmundial Initiative (NMI) was a controversial effort to create a new platform for internet governance issues. The NMI was named after an internet governance conference held by the Brazilian government and DNS overseer ICANN in May 2014; it was intended to help turn the conference's final principles into action.

The London Process is a series of multistakeholder meetings held biennially since 2011 under the name Global Conference on Cyberspace or GCCS. In each GCCS meeting, governments, the private sector and civil society gather to discuss and promote practical cooperation in cyberspace, to enhance cyber capacity building, and to discuss norms for responsible behavior in cyberspace. The London Process was proposed by British Foreign Secretary William Hague at the 2011 Munich Security Conference.

The Global Commission on Internet Governance, chaired by Carl Bildt and launched by two think tanks, the Canadian Centre for International Governance Innovation and UK-based Chatham House, was formed in January 2014 to make recommendations about the future of global internet governance. It is also considered one of the international initiatives that facilitate effective cooperation between relevant international actors, particularly according to the principles of internet governance.

Multistakeholder participation is a specific governance approach whereby relevant stakeholders participate in the collective shaping of evolutions and uses of the Internet.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Global Commission on the Stability of Cyberspace</span> Commission developing diplomatic norms limiting cyber-offense

The Global Commission on the Stability of Cyberspace was a multistakeholder Internet governance organization, dedicated to the creation of diplomatic norms of governmental non-aggression in cyberspace. It operated for three years, from 2017 through 2019, and produced the diplomatic norm for which it was chartered and seven others.

The African Internet Governance Forum (AfIGF) is a multistakeholder forum that facilitates dialogue on Internet governance issues. It is one of the 19 regional IGF initiatives and aims to address and discuss the issues of all 54 nations in Africa.

South Eastern European Dialogue on Internet Governance (SEEDIG) is an officially recognized subregional multistakeholder Internet Governance Forum on Internet and digital policy issues. This subregional IGF National and Regional Initiative (NRI) is of particular relevance for South East Europe and its neighbours. SEEDIG has been founded in 2014 and is structured as an open and informal space for different stakeholders to discuss Internet-related issues. Annual forums are held in different parts of the region. The first annual forum was held in June 2015 in Sofia, Bulgaria.

References

  1. ↑ "Internet & Jurisdiction - A Global Multistakeholder Policy Network". www.internetjurisdiction.net. Retrieved 2017-04-29.
  2. ↑ "Why Global Online Trade Is Threatened By a 'Legal Arms Race'". Fortune. Retrieved 2017-04-29.
  3. ↑ "Lost in the splinternet". The Economist. Retrieved 2017-04-29.
  4. ↑ Grassegger, Hannes (2014-02-11). "NSA-Affäre: Staaten nehmen das "Inter" aus dem Internet". Die Zeit. ISSN   0044-2070 . Retrieved 2017-04-29.
  5. ↑ "Faut-il une Cour internationale de l'Internet ?". L'Obs (in French). Retrieved 2017-04-29.
  6. ↑ "Mission". Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network. Retrieved 2017-04-29.
  7. ↑ "Net Politics A Legal Arms Race Threatens the Future of the Internet - Net Politics". Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved 2017-04-29.
  8. ↑ Fehlinger, Paul; Chapelle, Bertrand de La (2016-04-18). "The Legal Arms Race Threatening the Future of the Global Internet". Slate. ISSN   1091-2339 . Retrieved 2017-04-29.
  9. ↑ "Events". Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network. Retrieved 2017-04-29.
  10. ↑ "List of Open Forums at the IGF 2016". Internet Governance Forum.
  11. ↑ "Digital Economy Ministerial Meeting - Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development". www.oecd.org. Retrieved 2017-04-30.
  12. ↑ "ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL BENEFITS OF INTERNET OPENNESS - OECD Ministerial Meeting Background Report". OECD.
  13. ↑ "Chair's report of the meeting of the G7 Ise-Shima Cyber Group – Sommet du G7 – G7 Summit". g7.gc.ca. Retrieved 2018-04-26.
  14. ↑ "Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network". www.internetjurisdiction.net. Retrieved 2018-11-17.
  15. ↑ "2019 United Nations Secretary General Report prepared by UNCTAD for the Economic and Social Council of the UN General Assembly on the "Progress made in the implementation of and follow-up to the outcomes of the World Summit on the Information Society"" (PDF).
  16. ↑ United Nations. "Report of the UN Secretary-General's High-level Panel on Digital Cooperation" (PDF).
  17. ↑ "Work of the Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network". Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network. 3 December 2022.
  18. ↑ "Internet & Jurisdiction - A Global Multistakeholder Policy Network". www.internetjurisdiction.net. Retrieved 2017-04-29.
  19. ↑ "What is the "splinternet"?". The Economist. Retrieved 2017-04-29.
  20. ↑ "NetMundial Multistakeholder Statement" (PDF).
  21. ↑ "United Nations, General Assembly, A/72/64-E/2017/12 Secretary General's Report" (PDF).
  22. ↑ "I&J Presents Work and GIJC 2016 outcomes to G7 Cyber Group". Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network. 3 December 2022.
  23. ↑ "G20: I&J Presented Progress at Conference on Digital Future". Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network. 3 December 2022.
  24. ↑ "Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network - Ottawa Roadmap 2018" (PDF).
  25. ↑ "Rebuild Internet Governance before it's too late". Financial Times. February 20, 2018.
  26. ↑ "The internet is broken. Can this group fix it?". POLITICO. 2018-02-25. Retrieved 2018-04-26.
  27. ↑ "Chair's report of the meeting of the G7 Ise-Shima Cyber Group – Sommet du G7 – G7 Summit". g7.gc.ca. Retrieved 2018-04-26.
  28. ↑ Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network (3 December 2022). "Operational Approaches Documents 2019".{{cite web}}: |last= has generic name (help)
  29. ↑ Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network (3 December 2022). "Berlin Roadmap".{{cite web}}: |last= has generic name (help)
  30. ↑ Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network (3 December 2022). "I&J Global Status Report 2019".{{cite web}}: |last= has generic name (help)
  31. ↑ "The Global Internet Is Splintering Apart and No-One Is Patching It Up". Fortune. Retrieved 2020-08-18.
  32. ↑ Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network (3 December 2022). "Key Findings of the I&J and UN ECLAC Regional Status Report 2020".{{cite web}}: |last= has generic name (help)
  33. ↑ "I&J Retrospect Database". Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network. 3 December 2022.
  34. ↑ "Lost in the splinternet". The Economist. Retrieved 2017-04-29.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.