J. Rodney Gilstrap | |
---|---|
Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas | |
Assumed office March 1, 2018 | |
Preceded by | Ron Clark |
Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas | |
Assumed office December 6,2011 | |
Appointed by | Barack Obama |
Preceded by | Thad Heartfield |
Personal details | |
Born | Pensacola,Florida,U.S. | May 1,1957
Education | Baylor University (BA,JD) |
James Rodney Gilstrap (born May 1,1957) is the Chief United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. He is notable for presiding over more than one quarter of all patent infringement cases filed in the nation and is often referred to by various sources as the country's single "busiest patent judge." [1] [2]
Gilstrap was born in Pensacola,Florida. He is an Eagle Scout. He received a Bachelor of Arts from Baylor University in 1978,where he graduated magna cum laude. [3] As an undergraduate he was inducted into Phi Beta Kappa. He also earned a Juris Doctor from Baylor Law School in 1981, [4] where he was associate editor of the Baylor Law Review. While on the review,he published the article Video Recorders:Copyright Infringement,33 Baylor Law Review 695 (1981). [5] Gilstrap later served as president of the Baylor Law Alumni Association. [3] [6]
After graduation from law school,Gilstrap entered private practice in the town of Marshall,Texas as an Associate with the firm of Abney,Baldwin &Searcy from 1981 to 1984. [7] [6] He later became a founding Partner of Smith &Gilstrap in Marshall from 1984 to 1989,where his practice covered oil and gas,real estate,probate law and occasionally patent cases. [7] [8] Among the patent cases Gilstrap worked on while at Smith &Gilstrap included defending Capital One Financial Corporation in a patent suit brought by LML Patent Corporation alleging patent infringement by several banks on patents covering payment services and the representation of a company called Bluestone Innovations Texas in a patent infringement suit brought against a number of foreign companies involving Light-emitting diodes (or LED) technology. [9] Gilstrap served as a Harrison County Judge from 1989 to 2002. [10] Gilstrap also served 16 years on the Courthouse Preservation Council in Marshall,and also served as the Chair of the Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee with the State Bar of Texas. [10] In 2004,Gilstrap co-authored an article with Leland de la Garza which appeared in the Texas Bar Journal:UPL:Unlicensed,Unwanted and Unwelcome 67 Texas Bar Journal 798 (2004). While and after serving as a Harrison County Judge,Gilstrap was practicing at Smith &Gilstrap until he became appointed to the federal bench in 2011. [6]
On May 19,2011,President Barack Obama nominated Gilstrap to a seat on United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. [4] [7] [11] Gilstrap was rated as Unanimously Qualified by the American Bar Association and had a hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee on July 28,2011. [12] On September 15,2011,the Senate Judiciary Committee reported his nomination to the Senate floor by voice vote. The Senate confirmed his nomination by voice vote on December 5,2011. [13] He received his commission on December 6,2011. [6] He became the chief judge on March 1,2018,after Ron Clark assumed senior status. [14]
According to Lex Machina and other sources,Gilstrap is the United States district judge that hears the most patent cases in the country and has been referred to by many sources as the nation's single "busiest patent judge". [1] [2] In 2016,for example,1,119 cases were brought before Gilstrap,who saw more new cases than the next 10 highest ranking judges –2016 was also the fourth year in a row where Gilstrap had more patent cases than any other federal judge. [15] In 2015,over 28% of the nation's patent cases were filed before him. [1] Gilstrap and United States Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne,who are the only two judges based out of the Marshall division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas,also have the most patent cases filed before them out of the predominant share of the nation's patent cases that are filed in the Eastern District of Texas. [1] [16] [17] [18] In 2023-24,Chief Judge Gilstrap regained the title of top patent judge with the most patent cases filed before him. [19] [20]
From 2014 to 2015,Gilstrap was ranked first amongst all federal judges (either United States district judge or United States magistrate judge) with the most patent cases filed before him. [21] According to Docket Navigator,in 2015 Gilstrap was also ranked first as to the single federal judge having to preside over the highest number of filed cases,the highest number of litigants,and the highest number of accusations. [22] Also according to Docket Navigator,Gilstrap is the top ranked (#1) most active federal judge (either district or magistrate judge) by number of parties,number of orders and by number of cases from the years of 2014 to 2008 (even though he came on the bench in 2011) for patent litigation. [23]
October 2021 reporting by The Wall Street Journal revealed that since 2011,Gilstrap had presided over 138 cases in which a familial financial conflicts of interest allegedly required his recusal. [41] The paper's investigation revealed he held the national record for number of cases in which a federal judge did not recuse himself owing to an alleged familial financial conflict of interest. [42] However,the investigation also noted that Gilstrap had not taken any action (and certainly not any biased action) because virtually all of the cases at issue settled by agreement of the parties,prior to the defendant filing an answer and prior to the Court making any ruling on the merits. [43] Notably,Gilstrap did not have a direct financial conflict in any of the cases—instead,the alleged conflict stemmed from the fact that Gilstrap's spouse was the beneficiary of a third-party trust which neither Gilstrap nor his spouse controlled,which had invested in portfolios that included certain stocks. [43] For the avoidance of even any appearance of a conflict,the trust promptly divested the stocks at issue immediately after the alleged conflicts came to light. [43] The paper's investigation does not identify any conflict following the divestiture. [43]
Jones Day is an American multinational law firm based in Washington,D.C. As of 2023,it is one of the largest law firms in the United States with 2,302 attorneys,and among the highest grossing in the world with revenues of $2.5 billion. Originally headquartered in Cleveland,Ohio,Jones Day ranks first in both M&A league tables and the 2017 U.S. Law Firm Brand Index. The firm has represented over half of the companies in the Fortune 500,including Goldman Sachs,General Motors,McDonald's,and Bridgestone. Jones Day has also represented the campaign of former president Donald Trump.
In international law and business,patent trolling or patent hoarding is a categorical or pejorative term applied to a person or company that attempts to enforce patent rights against accused infringers far beyond the patent's actual value or contribution to the prior art,often through hardball legal tactics Patent trolls often do not manufacture products or supply services based upon the patents in question. However,some entities,which do not practice their asserted patent,may not be considered "patent trolls",when they license their patented technologies on reasonable terms in advance.
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas is a federal court in the Fifth Circuit.
Baylor Law School is the oldest law school in Texas. Baylor Law School is affiliated with Baylor University and located in Waco,Texas. The school has been accredited by the American Bar Association since 1931 and has been a member of the Association of American Law Schools since 1938. The program offers training in all facets of law,including theoretical analysis,practical application,legal writing,advocacy,professional responsibility,and negotiation and counseling skills.
Alcatel-Lucent v. Microsoft Corp.,also known as Lucent Technologies Inc. v. Gateway Inc.,was a long-running patent infringement case between Alcatel-Lucent and Microsoft litigated in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California and appealed multiple times to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Alcatel-Lucent was awarded $1.53 billion in a final verdict in August 2007 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California in San Diego. The damages award was reversed on appeal in September 2009,and the case was returned for a separate trial on the amount of damages.
Thomas John Ward is a retired United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. He is best known for the large number of patent infringement cases brought before his court in Marshall,Texas.
William Mark Lanier is an American trial lawyer and founder and CEO of the Lanier Law Firm. He has led a number of high-profile product litigation suits resulting in billions of dollars in damages,including Johnson &Johnson baby powder and Merck &Co.'s Vioxx drug.
Leonard E. Davis is an American lawyer and former judge. He served as Chief Justice of the Twelfth Court of Appeals of Texas,from 2000–2002,and was nominated by George W. Bush on January 23,2002 to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas until his retirement May 15th,2015.
McKool Smith is a U.S. trial firm with more than 130 trial lawyers across seven offices in Austin,Dallas,Houston,Los Angeles,Marshall,New York City,and Washington,DC. The firm represents clients in disputes involving commercial litigation,intellectual property (IP),bankruptcy,and white collar defense matters.
TiVo Inc. v. EchoStar Corp. is a case stretching from 2004 to 2011,which took place in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas and the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. TiVo Inc. sued EchoStar Corp. claiming patent infringement of a DVR technology. The issues addressed during litigation included patent infringement,wording of injunctions,infringing product redesign,contempt of court orders,and contempt sanctions. Ultimately,the court held that EchoStar Corp. had indeed infringed TiVo Inc's patent and was in contempt of court for noncompliance of an injunction. The parties reached a settlement wherein EchoStar Corp. paid TiVo Inc. a licensing fee. Further,the court replaced the established contempt test with a single step test. The simplified test makes it more difficult for patent holders to prove contempt as a result of repeat infringement.
Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.,Ltd. is the general title of a series of patent infringement lawsuits between Apple Inc. and Samsung Electronics in the United States Court system,regarding the design of smartphones and tablet computers. Between them,the two companies have dominated the manufacturing of smartphones since the early 2010s,and made about 40% of all smartphones sold worldwide as of 2024. In early 2011,Apple began litigating against Samsung in patent infringement suits,with Samsung typically filing countersuits with similar allegations. Apple's multinational litigation over technology patents became known as part of the smartphone wars:extensive litigation and fierce competition in the global market for consumer mobile communications.
Thomas M. Melsheimer is a trial lawyer and a partner at the international law firm of Winston &Strawn,where he also serves as managing partner of its Dallas office and a member of the firm’s Executive Committee. His trial experience encompasses both civil and criminal litigation. On the civil side,he has tried to verdict cases involving patent infringement,trade secrets,insider trading,antitrust,breach of fiduciary duty,fraud,product liability,and False Claims Act (FCA) violations. On the criminal side,he has tried to verdict cases involving bank fraud,public corruption,copyright infringement,aggravated sexual assault,and kidnapping. His clients include a variety of high-net-worth individuals and notable corporations,including the Dallas Mavericks and owner Mark Cuban,Microsoft,Bank of America,and Texas Instruments. Melsheimer is the co-author of a best-selling book on trial advocacy,On the Jury Trial:Principles and Practices for Effective Advocacy
Robert William Schroeder III is a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.
Kara Ann Farnandez Stoll is a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Halo Electronics,Inc. v. Pulse Electronics,Inc.,579 U.S. 93 (2016),was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the two-part Seagate test,used to determine when a district court may increase damages for patent infringement,is not consistent with Section 284 of the Patent Act.
Roy Steven Payne is currently a U.S. magistrate judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. He previously served as a U.S. magistrate judge in the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana from 1987 to 2005.
Alan D Albright is a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. He was formerly a United States magistrate judge of the same court. Albright oversees a significant portion of patent litigation within the United States. In 2021,the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit repeatedly rebuked him in a string of opinions for failing to transfer cases to more apt jurisdictions. A quarter of all patent lawsuits in the US were once heard by Albright,who has been widely criticized for ignoring binding case law. However,following a docket-stripping order issued by Chief Judge Orlando Garcia,Albright's patent docket has declined precipitously.
TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC,581 U.S. ___ (2017),was a United States Supreme Court case concerning the venue in patent infringement lawsuits.
Ada Elene Brown is a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. She is a former trial judge of the Dallas County courts and a former Justice of the Fifth Court of Appeals of Texas. She is the first African-American woman federal judge nominated by President Donald Trump and confirmed by the Senate. She is also the first African American woman to sit as a federal judge in the 140- year-history of the Northern District of Texas. A citizen of the Choctaw Nation,Brown is also one of six actively serving Native American federal judges of 673 federal district court judges. When appointed to the federal bench,Brown became the only woman judge in the 233-year history of the Choctaw Nation to serve as a federal judge.
Commil USA,LLC v. Cisco Systems,Inc.,135 S.Ct. 1920 (2015),was a 2015 decision by the United States Supreme Court pertaining to the standard for induced patent infringement. Writing for a 6-2 majority,Justice Anthony Kennedy held that (1) a claim of induced infringement requires a showing that the defendant knew that it is engaging in infringing conduct and (2) a defendant's belief that a patent is invalid is not a defense to a claim of induced infringement. Justice Antonin Scalia dissented from the second point,arguing that,in his view,a good faith belief in a patent's invalidity should constitute a defense to a charge of induced infringement.