Jakob Stoustrup

Last updated
Jakob Stoustrup
Jakob Stoustrup, Vise Dekan.jpg
Born (1963-01-16) January 16, 1963 (age 61)
Alma mater Technical University of Denmark
Known for Robust control
Fault-tolerant control
Plug-and-play control
AwardsThe Statoil Prize
The Dannin Award for Scientific Research
Scientific career
Fields Control Theory
Institutions Aalborg University
Technical University of Denmark
Doctoral advisor Martin Philip Bendsøe

Jakob Stoustrup is a Danish researcher employed at Aalborg University, where he serves as professor of control theory at the Department of Electronic Systems. [1] [2] [3]

Contents

Education

Jakob Stoustrup received the M.Sc. degree in Electrical Engineering in 1987, and the Ph.D. degree in Applied Mathematics in 1991, both from the Technical University of Denmark.

Background, career, and scientific contributions

After a first position as teaching assistant at the Technical University of Denmark, and visiting researcher at Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands, 1988, he became Senior Researcher sponsored by Danish Technical Research Council, 1991. Assistant Professor 1991–1995, and Associate Professor 1995–1996, both at the Department of Mathematics, Technical University of Denmark. He was visiting professor at the University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, U.K., in 1996, and later visiting professor at the Mittag-Leffler Institute, Stockholm, Sweden, 2003. From 1997–2013 and since 2016 (full) Professor at Automation & Control, Aalborg University, and from 2006–2013, he acted as Head of Research for the Department of Electronic Systems. From 2014 to 2016 he acted as Chief Scientist with the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, where he led the Control of Complex Systems Initiative. In 2017, Jakob Stoustrup was appointed as pro-dean for the TECH Faculty at Aalborg University.

Stoustrup has been a Member of the Swedish Research Council (Signals and Systems), of the Norwegian Research Council, of the European Research Council and of The Danish Research Council for Technology and Production Sciences. He has acted as associate editor, guest editor, and editorial board member of international journals. At several occasions, Jakob Stoustrup has acted as plenary speaker at international conferences, and he has also acted as a General Chair for such events. Jakob Stoustrup has been appointed by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, as Chairman of a Control Systems Society/Robotics & Automation Society Joint Chapter. In 2008, Jakob Stoustrup was elected as Chairman for a Technical Committee of the International Federation of Automatic Control, TC6.4. In 2011, he was appointed as a member of the Technical Board of the International Federation of Automatic Control. Jakob Stoustrup has extensive industrial cooperation, and has been CEO for two technological start-up companies. He has led numerous major research projects based on a high number of research grants and contracts.

The main contributions of Jakob Stoustrup have been to robust control theory and to the theory of fault tolerant control systems. In these two areas he has published approximately 300 peer-reviewed scientific papers. [1] In 2009, Jakob Stoustrup proposed a novel research direction in the area of control theory, called plug-and-play control. [4] As an unusual accomplishment, his work spans the whole range from the development of new theoretical methods to practical industrial applications.

In the area of robust control theory, Jakob Stoustrup has in particular contributed to the development of loop transfer recovery methods for the design of H controllers [5] and to the development of robust design methods for systems having parametric uncertainty descriptions. Loop transfer recovery methods have been among the most popular model based design methods used in industry for decades, due to their intuitive relationships between full state feedback designs and observer based designs. Loop transfer recovery methods were originally designed as an extension to the LQG design methodology, but Jakob Stoustrup and his co-workers advanced the recovery methods to the area of H control, thereby admitting robustness aspects to be included directly in the design paradigm. [6]

Jakob Stoustrup's contributions to the design of robust controllers for systems with parametric uncertainty descriptions have mainly been focusing on establishing methods based on convex optimization. Whereas parametric uncertainty descriptions are often natural candidates for systems with first principle models, because they reflect the variation of physical parameters, the underlying optimization problems often turns out to be non-convex, meaning that they do not readily admit efficient on-line solutions with guaranteed performance. However, in the work of Stoustrup and co-workers, it was described how a class of such problems could be turned into convex optimization problems, and explicit algorithms for efficient solutions were suggested. [7] One theoretical result from Stoustrup in the area of robust control states that for a fairly general class of systems, the order of a decentralized H controller tends to infinity as the performance approaches its optimal value, and in fact that not even an infinite-dimensional (causal) controller exists in that case. [8]

In the area of fault tolerant control systems, the main contribution of Jakob Stoustrup has been to introduce a number of optimization based methods in order to solve fault diagnosis and fault tolerant control problems. The results include explicit methods for time-varying, non-linear, and uncertain systems for the design of fault diagnosis and fault tolerant control systems. Inspired by his previous work in the area of robust control theory, Jakob Stoustrup and his co-workers has proposed a general architecture for the modeling and design of fault diagnosis and fault tolerant control systems, handling the above-mentioned challenges. [9]

One theoretical result by Jakob Stoustrup in the area of fault tolerant control systems provides a positive answer to a previously open problem. By a constructive proof it is established that under mild conditions, a feedback controller for a system with two or more sensors always exists such that the system remains stable if the signal from any one of the sensors disappear. It is also shown, however, that the smallest order of such a controller can be unboundedly large. [10]

Besides from the theoretical achievements mentioned above, Jakob Stoustrup has accomplished to bring a significant number among the theoretical results to actual industrial practice. Jakob Stoustrup and his group have worked with a significant number of industries in a wide range of industrial sectors. Examples of industrial applications from his group include:

These industrial applications have been carried out by Jakob Stoustrup in cooperation with more than 50 industrial companies in several countries.

Notable honors and awards

See also

Related Research Articles

Control theory is a field of control engineering and applied mathematics that deals with the control of dynamical systems in engineered processes and machines. The objective is to develop a model or algorithm governing the application of system inputs to drive the system to a desired state, while minimizing any delay, overshoot, or steady-state error and ensuring a level of control stability; often with the aim to achieve a degree of optimality.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Control system</span> System that manages the behavior of other systems

A control system manages, commands, directs, or regulates the behavior of other devices or systems using control loops. It can range from a single home heating controller using a thermostat controlling a domestic boiler to large industrial control systems which are used for controlling processes or machines. The control systems are designed via control engineering process.

Mechatronics engineering, also called mechatronics, is an interdisciplinary branch of engineering that focuses on the integration of mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, electronic engineering and software engineering, and also includes a combination of robotics, computer science, telecommunications, systems, control, and product engineering.

Hmethods are used in control theory to synthesize controllers to achieve stabilization with guaranteed performance. To use H methods, a control designer expresses the control problem as a mathematical optimization problem and then finds the controller that solves this optimization. H techniques have the advantage over classical control techniques in that H techniques are readily applicable to problems involving multivariate systems with cross-coupling between channels; disadvantages of H techniques include the level of mathematical understanding needed to apply them successfully and the need for a reasonably good model of the system to be controlled. It is important to keep in mind that the resulting controller is only optimal with respect to the prescribed cost function and does not necessarily represent the best controller in terms of the usual performance measures used to evaluate controllers such as settling time, energy expended, etc. Also, non-linear constraints such as saturation are generally not well-handled. These methods were introduced into control theory in the late 1970s-early 1980s by George Zames, J. William Helton , and Allen Tannenbaum.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">System identification</span> Statistical methods to build mathematical models of dynamical systems from measured data

The field of system identification uses statistical methods to build mathematical models of dynamical systems from measured data. System identification also includes the optimal design of experiments for efficiently generating informative data for fitting such models as well as model reduction. A common approach is to start from measurements of the behavior of the system and the external influences and try to determine a mathematical relation between them without going into many details of what is actually happening inside the system; this approach is called black box system identification.

Process engineering is the understanding and application of the fundamental principles and laws of nature that allow humans to transform raw material and energy into products that are useful to society, at an industrial level. By taking advantage of the driving forces of nature such as pressure, temperature and concentration gradients, as well as the law of conservation of mass, process engineers can develop methods to synthesize and purify large quantities of desired chemical products. Process engineering focuses on the design, operation, control, optimization and intensification of chemical, physical, and biological processes. Process engineering encompasses a vast range of industries, such as agriculture, automotive, biotechnical, chemical, food, material development, mining, nuclear, petrochemical, pharmaceutical, and software development. The application of systematic computer-based methods to process engineering is "process systems engineering".

Model predictive control (MPC) is an advanced method of process control that is used to control a process while satisfying a set of constraints. It has been in use in the process industries in chemical plants and oil refineries since the 1980s. In recent years it has also been used in power system balancing models and in power electronics. Model predictive controllers rely on dynamic models of the process, most often linear empirical models obtained by system identification. The main advantage of MPC is the fact that it allows the current timeslot to be optimized, while keeping future timeslots in account. This is achieved by optimizing a finite time-horizon, but only implementing the current timeslot and then optimizing again, repeatedly, thus differing from a linear–quadratic regulator (LQR). Also MPC has the ability to anticipate future events and can take control actions accordingly. PID controllers do not have this predictive ability. MPC is nearly universally implemented as a digital control, although there is research into achieving faster response times with specially designed analog circuitry.

Computational economics is an interdisciplinary research discipline that involves combines methods in computational science and economics to solve complex economic problems. This subject encompasses computational modeling of economic systems. Some of these areas are unique, while others established areas of economics by allowing robust data analytics and solutions of problems that would be arduous to research without computers and associated numerical methods.

Adaptive control is the control method used by a controller which must adapt to a controlled system with parameters which vary, or are initially uncertain. For example, as an aircraft flies, its mass will slowly decrease as a result of fuel consumption; a control law is needed that adapts itself to such changing conditions. Adaptive control is different from robust control in that it does not need a priori information about the bounds on these uncertain or time-varying parameters; robust control guarantees that if the changes are within given bounds the control law need not be changed, while adaptive control is concerned with control law changing itself.

In control theory, robust control is an approach to controller design that explicitly deals with uncertainty. Robust control methods are designed to function properly provided that uncertain parameters or disturbances are found within some set. Robust methods aim to achieve robust performance and/or stability in the presence of bounded modelling errors.

Control reconfiguration is an active approach in control theory to achieve fault-tolerant control for dynamic systems. It is used when severe faults, such as actuator or sensor outages, cause a break-up of the control loop, which must be restructured to prevent failure at the system level. In addition to loop restructuring, the controller parameters must be adjusted to accommodate changed plant dynamics. Control reconfiguration is a building block toward increasing the dependability of systems under feedback control.

Physicomimetics is physics-based swarm (computational) intelligence. The word is derived from physike and mimesis.

Robust optimization is a field of mathematical optimization theory that deals with optimization problems in which a certain measure of robustness is sought against uncertainty that can be represented as deterministic variability in the value of the parameters of the problem itself and/or its solution. It is related to, but often distinguished from, probabilistic optimization methods such as chance-constrained optimization.

The Advanced Learning and Research Institute (ALaRI), a faculty of informatics, was established in 1999 at the University of Lugano to promote research and education in embedded systems. The Faculty of Informatics within very few years has become one of the Switzerland major destinations for teaching and research, ranking third after the two Federal Institutes of Technology, Zurich and Lausanne.

Fault detection, isolation, and recovery (FDIR) is a subfield of control engineering which concerns itself with monitoring a system, identifying when a fault has occurred, and pinpointing the type of fault and its location. Two approaches can be distinguished: A direct pattern recognition of sensor readings that indicate a fault and an analysis of the discrepancy between the sensor readings and expected values, derived from some model. In the latter case, it is typical that a fault is said to be detected if the discrepancy or residual goes above a certain threshold. It is then the task of fault isolation to categorize the type of fault and its location in the machinery. Fault detection and isolation (FDI) techniques can be broadly classified into two categories. These include model-based FDI and signal processing based FDI.

The scenario approach or scenario optimization approach is a technique for obtaining solutions to robust optimization and chance-constrained optimization problems based on a sample of the constraints. It also relates to inductive reasoning in modeling and decision-making. The technique has existed for decades as a heuristic approach and has more recently been given a systematic theoretical foundation.

The Brooks–Iyengar algorithm or FuseCPA Algorithm or Brooks–Iyengar hybrid algorithm is a distributed algorithm that improves both the precision and accuracy of the interval measurements taken by a distributed sensor network, even in the presence of faulty sensors. The sensor network does this by exchanging the measured value and accuracy value at every node with every other node, and computes the accuracy range and a measured value for the whole network from all of the values collected. Even if some of the data from some of the sensors is faulty, the sensor network will not malfunction. The algorithm is fault-tolerant and distributed. It could also be used as a sensor fusion method. The precision and accuracy bound of this algorithm have been proved in 2016.

A networked control system (NCS) is a control system wherein the control loops are closed through a communication network. The defining feature of an NCS is that control and feedback signals are exchanged among the system's components in the form of information packages through a network.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dragoslav D. Šiljak</span>

Dragoslav D. Šiljak is Professor Emeritus of Electrical Engineering at Santa Clara University, where he held the title of Benjamin and Mae Swig University Professor. He is best known for developing the mathematical theory and methods for control of complex dynamic systems characterized by large-scale, information structure constraints and uncertainty.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wassim Michael Haddad</span>

Wassim Michael Haddad is a Lebanese-Greek-American applied mathematician, scientist, and engineer, with research specialization in the areas of dynamical systems and control. His research has led to fundamental breakthroughs in applied mathematics, thermodynamics, stability theory, robust control, dynamical system theory, and neuroscience. Professor Haddad is a member of the faculty of the School of Aerospace Engineering at Georgia Institute of Technology, where he holds the rank of Professor and Chair of the Flight Mechanics and Control Discipline. Dr. Haddad is a member of the Academy of Nonlinear SciencesArchived 2016-03-04 at the Wayback Machine for recognition of paramount contributions to the fields of nonlinear stability theory, nonlinear dynamical systems, and nonlinear control and an IEEE Fellow for contributions to robust, nonlinear, and hybrid control systems.

References

  1. 1 2 "Selected publications by Jakob Stoustrup". Archived from the original on 2011-07-19. Retrieved 2009-06-12.
  2. Official staff page for Stoustrup at Aalborg University
  3. Entry for Jakob Stoustrup at Mathematics Genealogy Project
  4. J. Stoustrup (2009), "Plug & play control: Control technology towards new challenges", European Journal of Control, 15(3-4):311–330. DOI.
  5. K. Zhou, JC Doyle and K. Glover (1996), Robust And Optimal Control, Prentice Hall, ISBN   978-0-13-456567-5.
  6. J. Stoustrup and H.H. Niemann (1993), "State space solutions to the H/LTR design problem", International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 3:1–45. DOI.
  7. K. Zhou, P.P. Khargonekar, J. Stoustrup, and H.H. Niemann (1995), "Robust performance of systems with structured uncertainties in state space", Automatica, 31(2):249–255. DOI.
  8. J. Stoustrup and H.H. Niemann (1999). "Dynamical orders of decentralized controllers". IMA Journal of Mathematical Control and Information, 16:299–308. DOI.
  9. H. Niemann and J. Stoustrup (2005), "An architecture for fault tolerant controllers", International Journal of Control, 78(14):1091–1110, 2005. DOI.
  10. J. Stoustrup and V.D. Blondel (2004), "Fault tolerant control: A simultaneous stabilization result", IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 49(2):305–310. DOI.
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Research projects Archived 2013-02-12 at archive.today of Jakob Stoustrup
  12. 1 2 Method for determining the channel gain between emitters and receivers, United States Patent 6799141 Archived 2011-06-12 at the Wayback Machine
  13. P.F. Odgaard, J. Stoustrup, P. Andersen, and E. Vidal (2008). "Accommodation of repetitive sensor faults – applied to surface faults on compact discs". IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology,, 16:348–355. DOI
  14. J. Stoustrup, O. Schedletzky, S.J. Glaser, C. Griesinger, N.C. Nielsen, and O.W. Sørensen (1995). "A generalized bound on quantum dynamics: Efficiency of unitary transformations between non-hermitian states". Physical Review Letters,, 74(2):2921–2924. DOI
  15. K.Z. Østergaard, J. Stoustrup, and P. Brath (2009). "Linear parameter varying control of wind turbines covering both partial load and full load conditions". International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control,, 19(1):92–116. DOI
  16. M.S. Svendsen, J. Helbo, J. Stoustrup, M.R. Hansen, D.B. Popovic, and M.M. Pedersen (2009). "AAU-BOT1: a platform for studying dynamic, life-like walking". Applied Bionics and Biomechanics. DOI