Jennifer E. Nashold

Last updated
The Honorable
Jennifer Nashold
Judge of the Wisconsin Court of Appeals District IV
Incumbent
Assumed office
August 1, 2019

Jennifer Elise Nashold is an American attorney, currently serving as a judge of the Wisconsin Court of Appeals. She was elected in 2019.

Contents

Early life and career

Nashold was born in Madison, Wisconsin. She received her Bachelor of Arts from the University of Wisconsin-Madison in 1988 and her Juris Doctor from the University of Wisconsin Law School in 1993. [1] [2]

After graduating law school, Nashold has spent her entire legal career in public service. She served as a law clerk for Justice Miriam Shearing of the Supreme Court of Nevada and then–Judge Jesse Walters of the Idaho Court of Appeals. From 1996 to 1997, she served as a Deputy Prosecuting Attorney for Ada County, Idaho. [1]

Wisconsin offices

In 1998, Nashold was hired as an Assistant Attorney General in the Wisconsin Department of Justice, working under future Governor Jim Doyle. Over the next six years, she handled many of the Wisconsin Department of Justice's cases and filings before the Wisconsin Supreme Court. In 2004, she was appointed member and chair of the Wisconsin Tax Appeals Commission by Governor Doyle, serving a three-year term. In 2007, she was appointed General Counsel of the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin, and, in 2010, was made Chief Legal Counsel to the Wisconsin Department of Children and Families. In 2011, she was hired as an Administrative Law Judge in the Wisconsin Department of Administration, Division of Hearings and Appeals, where she served until her election to the Court of Appeals. [1]

Legislator misconduct cases (2002–2003)

In 2001, a Wisconsin State Journal report uncovered a significant number of cases of Wisconsin legislators making illegal use of their state offices and resources for political purposes. [3] The report prompted investigations by several Wisconsin district attorneys, who indicted several legislators and staffers for activities related to the report, including Brian Burke (D-Milwaukee), Charles Chvala (D-Madison), Scott Jensen (R-Waukesha), Steven Foti (R-Oconomowoc), and Republican staffer and fundraiser Sherry Schultz. Nashold, then working as an Assistant Attorney General, was assigned to coordinate the Wisconsin Department of Justice filings in relation to the ongoing cases. [4]

Brian Burke claimed legislative immunity from prosecution due to his status as a legislator during an ongoing session of the state legislature. [5] Nashold successfully argued to the Wisconsin Supreme Court that they should not take up his case, stating that his immunity claims were not supported by a fair reading of the state constitution. [5]

Nashold also handled filings related to Chvala, Jensen, Foti, and Schultz, who attempted to get several of their charges dismissed by the Appeals Court prior to the case being heard in the circuit court. [4]

Police misconduct prosecution (2004)

In 2004, Nashold was assigned to serve as special prosecutor for the case of Whitehall, Wisconsin, police officer Daniel J. Wineski, who had been accused of misconduct and abusing his office. Nashold's investigation led to Wineski's indictment on six charges, including sexual assault of a child, intimidation of a victim, false imprisonment, and misconduct in office. [6] Later that year, Wineski pled guilty to reduced charges of third degree sexual assault and misconduct in office, but additional accusers continued to come forward after his guilty plea revealing a twenty-year pattern of misconduct. [7]

Judicial career

During the 8 years when Jim Doyle served as Governor, Nashold was considered at least three times for appointments to various circuit and appeals judgeships when vacancies arose, but ultimately was not selected. [8]

In the 2019 election, Nashold was the lone candidate for Judge of the Wisconsin Court of Appeals in the Madison-based District IV. [9] She was elected to office April 2, 2019, replacing retiring judge Paul Lundsten, who had served nearly 20 years on the court. [10]

2019–2020 Voter purge

In her first few months on the court, Judge Nashold heard the case State of Wisconsin ex rel. Timothy Zignego v. Wisconsin Elections Commission. The case arose from an effort on the part of the conservative Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty to bring suit against the Wisconsin Elections Commission in an attempt to force a purge of roughly 234,000 registered voters in Wisconsin—which would have been the biggest purge of voters in state history. [11] The plaintiffs in the case were Timothy Zignego, a conservative businessman and Republican donor, David W. Opitz, a former Republican state legislator, and Frederick G. Luehrs III. The complaint alleged that, according to a 2015 law, voter officials were required to purge any voter who did not respond within 30 days to a notice requesting an update to their voter registration. The targeted voters were identified with the assistance of a national voter database Electronic Registration Information Center, which took the place of the Interstate Voter Registration Crosscheck Program, which had been shut down in large part due to its contributions to several massive erroneous purges of voters. [12] A previous attempt to purge Wisconsin voters who were identified as having "moved" based on data from the Electronic Registration Information Center resulted in a large number of inaccurate voter deactivations, causing significant voter difficulties in the 2018 Wisconsin elections. [13] : 8 

At the Wisconsin Circuit Court in Ozaukee County, the Republican plaintiffs prevailed and obtained an order from Judge Paul V. Malloy to compel the Elections Commission to act within 30 days. The decision received international attention, with Governor of Wisconsin Tony Evers, Speaker of the United States House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi, and former United States Attorney General Eric Holder among officials calling the order irresponsible, undemocratic, and racially targeted. [14] [15] [16]

The ruling was referred to the Court of Appeals by Wisconsin Attorney Generall Josh Kaul, along with appeals by the League of Women Voters and individual elections commissioners who were targeted with contempt citations for failing to enforce the order on its original 30 day deadline. After an initial stay of the Circuit Court opinion, Judge Nashold ruled in a panel with judges JoAnne Kloppenburg and Michael R. Fitzpatrick in favor of the Elections Commission, putting a halt to the voter purge. Their decision pointed to the plain language of the statute which was the basis for the complaint, which did not place any requirement on the Elections Commission to act in the manner previously ordered. [13] : 5  As a result, the mandamus order, which requires "clear, specific legal right which is free from substantial doubt," was rejected and the contempt citations were reversed. [13] : 44  [17]

The decision remains in effect, as a challenge to the Wisconsin Supreme Court initially resulted in a deadlocked 3-3 decision. However, the court may take up the case again after the 2020 Wisconsin elections. [18]

Related Research Articles

Voter caging involves challenging the registration status of voters and calling into question the legality of allowing them to vote. Usually it involves sending mail directly to registered voters and compiling a list from mail returned undelivered. Undeliverable mail is seen as proof that the person no longer resides at the address on their voter registration. The resultant list is then used by election officials to purge names from the voter registration rolls or to challenge voters' eligibility to vote on the grounds that the voters no longer reside at their registered addresses.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wisconsin Supreme Court</span> Highest court in the U.S. state of Wisconsin

The Wisconsin Supreme Court is the highest appellate court in Wisconsin. The Supreme Court has jurisdiction over original actions, appeals from lower courts, and regulation or administration of the practice of law in Wisconsin.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lynn Adelman</span> American judge (born 1939)

Lynn Steven Adelman is an American lawyer, judge, and former politician. He has served as a United States district judge for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, since December 1997. Earlier in his career, he served 20 years in the Wisconsin State Senate, representing southwest Milwaukee County and neighboring municipalities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Charles Chvala</span> American politician

Charles Joseph "Chuck" Chvala is an American real estate dealer, lawyer, and former politician. He served 20 years in the Wisconsin State Senate, representing Dane County, and was the Democratic leader from 1995 through 2002. His political career was ended by a 2002 scandal which found he and other lawmakers had illegally utilized state employees for campaign work.

Paul Coulter Gartzke was an American lawyer and judge. He served 18 years as presiding judge of the Wisconsin Court of Appeals in the Madison-based District IV court.

The Wisconsin Government Accountability Board (G.A.B.) was a regulatory agency of the U.S. state of Wisconsin which administered and enforced Wisconsin law pertaining to campaign finance, elections, ethics, and lobbying. The board was composed of six retired Wisconsin judges who served staggered, six-year terms. The board was created in 2007 as an attempt to reform and modernize Wisconsin's elections and ethics management. The board was dissolved in 2016 by the Republican legislature and replaced by two new commissions with explicitly partisan appointees, over the objections of Democratic legislators.

Shelby County v. Holder, 570 U.S. 529 (2013), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding the constitutionality of two provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965: Section 5, which requires certain states and local governments to obtain federal preclearance before implementing any changes to their voting laws or practices; and subsection (b) of Section 4, which contains the coverage formula that determines which jurisdictions are subject to preclearance based on their histories of racial discrimination in voting.

David W. Opitz is a former member of the Wisconsin State Assembly and the Wisconsin State Senate.

Voter suppression in the United States consists of various legal and illegal efforts to prevent eligible citizens from exercising their right to vote. Such voter suppression efforts vary by state, local government, precinct, and election. Voter suppression has historically been used for racial, economic, gender, age and disability discrimination. After the American Civil War, all African-American men were granted voting rights, but poll taxes or language tests were used to limit and suppress the ability to register or cast a ballot. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 improved voting access. Since the beginning of voter suppression efforts, proponents of these laws have cited concerns over electoral integrity as a justification for various restrictions and requirements, while opponents argue that these constitute bad faith given the lack of voter fraud evidence in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2014 Wisconsin elections</span>

The 2014 Wisconsin Fall General Election was held in the U.S. state of Wisconsin on November 4, 2014. Wisconsin's Governor, Lieutenant Governor, Attorney General, Secretary of State, and State Treasurer were all up for election, as well as Wisconsin's eight seats in the United States House of Representatives. The November general election in 2014 also featured a statewide referendum on an amendment to the Constitution of Wisconsin. The 2014 Wisconsin Fall Primary Election was held on August 12, 2014.

Brian Keith Hagedorn is an American lawyer and a justice of the Wisconsin Supreme Court, serving since 2019. Prior to his election to the supreme court, he served four years as a judge on the Wisconsin Court of Appeals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wisconsin Elections Commission</span> Wisconsin state commission charged with administering and enforcing election laws

The Wisconsin Elections Commission is a bipartisan regulatory agency of the state of Wisconsin established to administer and enforce election laws in the state. The Wisconsin Elections Commission was established by a 2015 act of the Wisconsin Legislature which also established the Wisconsin Ethics Commission to administer campaign finance, ethics, and lobbying laws. The two commissions began operation on June 30, 2016, replacing the Wisconsin Government Accountability Board (GAB), which was abolished.

The Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty (WILL) is a nonprofit conservative law firm based in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The group was founded by lawyer Rick Esenberg in 2011.

The Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF) is an American conservative legal group based in Alexandria, Virginia, which is known for suing states and local governments to purge voters from election rolls. The nonprofit was constituted in 2012.

Paul V. Malloy is the presiding circuit court judge for Ozaukee County, Wisconsin.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 Wisconsin elections</span>

The 2020 Wisconsin Fall general election was held in the U.S. state of Wisconsin on November 3, 2020. All of Wisconsin's eight seats in the United States House of Representatives were up for election, as well as sixteen seats in the Wisconsin State Senate and all 99 seats in the Wisconsin State Assembly. Voters also chose ten electors to represent them in the Electoral College, which then participated in selecting the president of the United States. The 2020 Fall partisan primary was held on August 11, 2020.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2019 Wisconsin elections</span>

The 2019 Wisconsin Spring Election was held in the U.S. state of Wisconsin on April 2, 2019. There was one seat on the Wisconsin Supreme Court on the ballot, as well as several other nonpartisan local and judicial elections. There were also a number of local referendums for school funding. The 2019 Wisconsin Spring Primary was held February 19, 2019.

In direct response to election changes related to the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 United States presidential election in Wisconsin; Donald Trump's campaign launched numerous lawsuits contesting the election processes of Wisconsin. All were either dismissed or dropped.

Law Forward is an American non-profit legal advocacy organization based in Madison, Wisconsin. Jeff Mandell and Doug Poland founded Law Forward in October 2020. Poland was notable for his role as a lead trial attorney in Gill v. Whitford, a major 2018 U.S. Supreme Court case involving the constitutionality of partisan gerrymandering.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2023 Wisconsin elections</span>

The 2023 Wisconsin Spring Election was held in the U.S. state of Wisconsin on April 4, 2023. The featured race at the top of the ticket was for an open seat on the Wisconsin Supreme Court, which became the most expensive judicial election in history. Several other nonpartisan local and judicial offices were also decided on the April 4 ballot, including mayoral elections in some of Wisconsin's larger cities—Green Bay, Madison, and Racine. In addition, a special election was held in the 8th State Senate district, concurrent with the Spring elections. The 2023 Wisconsin Spring Primary was held February 21, 2023.

References

  1. 1 2 3 "Court of Appeals Judges - Judge Jennifer E. Nashold". Wisconsin Court System. Retrieved 2019-09-03.
  2. ↑ "Attorney Information - Jennifer Elise Nashold". State Bar of Wisconsin . Retrieved 2020-04-14.
  3. ↑ Hall, Dee J. (May 20, 2001). "State employees secretly campaign". Wisconsin State Journal . Retrieved September 12, 2020.
  4. 1 2 "Embattled pols appeal cases". The Capital Times . Madison, Wisconsin. November 20, 2003. p. 3. Retrieved September 12, 2020– via Newspapers.com.
  5. 1 2 "Senator can't delay proceedings". The Daily Tribune . Madison, Wisconsin. December 14, 2002. p. 7. Retrieved September 12, 2020– via Newspapers.com.
  6. ↑ "Report says officer threatened victim". Eau Claire Leader-Telegram . March 17, 2004. p. 2. Retrieved September 12, 2020– via Newspapers.com.
  7. ↑ Springer, Dan (January 9, 2005). "Two decades later, woman tells of sexual abuse by recently convicted Whitehall police officer". La Crosse Tribune . p. 1. Retrieved September 12, 2020– via Newspapers.com.
  8. ↑ Treleven, Ed (November 21, 2009). "Finalists named for appeals court seat". Wisconsin State Journal . p. 3. Retrieved September 12, 2020– via Newspapers.com.
  9. ↑ "Final list of Madison-area candidates running in the 2019 spring elections". madison.com. January 3, 2019. Retrieved 2019-09-03.
  10. ↑ Canvass Results for 2019 Spring Election - 4/2/2019 (PDF) (Report). Wisconsin Elections Commission. April 22, 2019. p. 1. Retrieved September 12, 2020.[ permanent dead link ]
  11. ↑ Vetterkind, Riley (December 19, 2019). "State appeals court keeps in place voter purge ruling for now". Wisconsin State Journal . Retrieved September 12, 2020.
  12. ↑ Huseman, Jessica (December 12, 2019). "Kansas Abandons Technology Trumpeted by Kris Kobach, Trump's Onetime Voter Fraud Czar". ProPublica . Retrieved September 12, 2020.
  13. 1 2 3 State of Wisconsin ex rel. Timothy Zignego v. Wisconsin Elections Commission, WI App17 (Wisconsin Court of AppealsFebruary 28, 2020).
  14. ↑ Bekiempis, Victoria (December 14, 2019). "Wisconsin judge's ruling could purge 200,000 from voter rolls". The Guardian . Retrieved September 12, 2020.
  15. ↑ Stern, Mark Joseph (December 16, 2019). "How a Conservative Group Persuaded a Judge to Purge Wisconsin's Voter Rolls". Slate . Retrieved September 12, 2020.
  16. ↑ Wikler, Ben (December 24, 2019). "Wisconsin threw hundreds of thousands off the voter rolls, endangering democracy". CNN . Retrieved September 12, 2020.
  17. ↑ Marley, Patrick (February 28, 2020). "Wisconsin appeals court rules voters targeted for purge will remain on the rolls". Milwaukee Journal Sentinel . Retrieved September 12, 2020.
  18. ↑ Schmidt, Mitchell (July 1, 2020). "Supreme Court unlikely to rule on voter purge case before November election". Wisconsin State Journal . Retrieved September 12, 2020.
Legal offices
Preceded byJudge of the Wisconsin Court of Appeals District IV
August 1, 2019 –present		Incumbent
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.