Kuttiyil Mathew Joseph | |
---|---|
Judge of the Supreme Court of India | |
In office 7 August 2018 –16 June 2023 | |
Nominated by | Dipak Misra |
Appointed by | Ram Nath Kovind |
Chief Justice of the Uttarakhand High Court | |
In office 31 July 2014 –6 August 2018 | |
Nominated by | Rajendra Mal Lodha |
Appointed by | Pranab Mukherjee |
Preceded by | Sudhanshu Dhulia (acting) |
Succeeded by | Rajeev Sharma (acting) |
Judge of the Kerala High Court | |
In office 14 October 2004 –30 July 2014 | |
Nominated by | Ramesh Chandra Lahoti |
Appointed by | A. P. J. Abdul Kalam |
Personal details | |
Born | Athirampuzha,Kerala,India | 17 June 1958
Alma mater | Loyola College,Chennai Government Law College,Ernakulam |
Kuttiyil Mathew Joseph (born 17 June 1958) is a former judge of the Supreme Court of India;he retired on 16 June 2023. [1] He is former chief justice of the Uttarakhand High Court. [2] Before his appointment as chief justice of the High Court of Uttarakhand on 31 July 2014,he had served as a judge of the Kerala High Court for more than nine years.
Joseph was born in Kottayam,Kerala,India on 17 June 1958 to K. K. Mathew and Ammini Tharakan. His father,K. K. Mathew,was a judge of the Supreme Court of India,and chairman of the tenth Law Commission. He completed his secondary education from Kendriya Vidyalaya,Kochi and New Delhi. Later he joined Loyola College,Chennai,and Government Law College,Ernakulam for graduation and further studies. [2] [3] [4]
Joseph enrolled as an advocate on 12 January 1982 and started practising in the Delhi High Court. Later he shifted his practice to the High Court of Kerala,Ernakulam in 1983. In 1986,he started independent practice and specialised in civil,constitutional and writ matters. [2] He served as amicus curiae for a case that decided whether a Christian father under an obligation to maintain his minor child [5] just before being elevated to the High Court Bench.
He was appointed the permanent judge of the Kerala High Court on 14 October 2004. On 18 July 2014,the president of India appointed Joseph as the next chief justice of Uttarakhand,on the recommendation of then CJI Rajendra Mal Lodha. On 31 July 2014,he was sworn in as the 9th chief justice of the Uttarakhand High Court at Nainital. [3] [6] [4]
A bench headed by Justice Joseph had quashed the imposition of President's Rule in 2016 by the Narendra Modi led BJP government in the state of Uttarakhand. [7] While being a judge at the Kerala HC,a bench that included Joseph ordered the demolition of Kapico resorts constructed illegally on Nediathuruthu Island in Alappuzha district. [8]
In February 2017,Judge Jasti Chelameswar,a judge of the Supreme Court of India Collegium,recorded a strongly worded dissent note for not elevating K. M. Joseph to the Supreme Court of India. "Justice Joseph is an outstanding judge with impeccable integrity and the most suitable judge for elevation to the Supreme Court",Chelameswar wrote. "By not elevating a highly competent judge like Justice Joseph,the collegium was setting an unhealthy precedent",he added in the note. [9] [10]
According to media reports,on 11 January 2018,the Supreme Court Collegium had recommended the name of Joseph for their appointment as a judge of the Supreme Court. [11] [12] While recommending Joseph's name for elevation to the Supreme Court,the five member collegium unanimously said that "The Collegium considered that at the time of recommendation,Mr. Justice K. M. Joseph,who hails from Kerala High Court and was functioning as Chief Justice of Uttarakhand High Court,is more deserving and suitable in all respects than other Chief Justices and senior puisne Judges of High Courts for being appointed as Judges of the Supreme Court of India". [12] Despite the strongly worded recommendation of the collegium,there still existed some suspense on its acceptance by the NDA government. There were media reports speculating that the government had returned the files recommending to elevate Joseph to the Supreme Court. This was later dismissed by unidentified sources from the law ministry. [13]
On 26 April 2018,the government,in a letter to the then Chief Justice,Dipak Misra,stated that the proposed appointment of K.M. Joseph as a judge of the Supreme Court at that stage did not appear to be appropriate. In the letter,the Minister of Law and Justice,Ravi Shankar Prasad said that Justice K.M. Joseph was then placed at number 42 in the All India High Court Judges’Seniority list and that there were,at that time,11 Chief Justices of various High Courts who were senior to him. If his name were returned,the collegium could reiterate his name which would make it incumbent upon the government to issue a warrant for his appointment to the Supreme Court. [14]
On the same day of the government's refusal to appoint Joseph as a judge of the Supreme Court,the Supreme Court Bar Association moved a petition signed by 100 lawyers seeking a stay on the warrant appointing Indu Malhotra as a Supreme Court judge,as mentioned by senior lawyer Indira Jaising while speaking in front of the chief justice. She said that the petition was not against Smt. Indu Malhotra,but was against the government,which was not clearing the name of Joseph,for segregating the collegium's recommendation. CJI Dipak Misra sternly rebuked lawyers while the Supreme Court not only refused to stay Malhotra's appointment,but also termed the petition as unimaginable,unthinkable,inconceivable and never heard of. [15] The government's extraordinary step provoked outrage among opposition parties and questions from the legal fraternity,but the Chief Justice said:"If the centre has segregated the recommendation and sent one of the names for reconsideration,then they are within their rights." [16]
On 16 July 2018,Supreme Court Collegium headed by CJI Dipak Misra reiterated the name of K. M. Joseph for elevation to the Apex Court. The resolution by the collegium read that after careful consideration,the collegium did not find anything adverse regarding the suitability of Joseph J. in the letters from the Law Minister. [17] In a separate resolution,the Supreme Court Collegium recommended the names of Justice Indira Banerjee &Justice Vineet Saran,the CJs of Madras &Odisha High Courts,respectively. [18] [19]
The Supreme Court of India is the supreme judicial authority and the highest court of the Republic of India. It is the final court of appeal for all civil and criminal cases in India. It also has the power of judicial review. The Supreme Court,which consists of the Chief Justice of India and a maximum of fellow 33 judges,has extensive powers in the form of original,appellate and advisory jurisdictions.
The Orissa High Court is the High Court for the Indian state of Odisha.
Konakuppakatil Gopinathan Balakrishnan is an Indian judge who served as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of India and later the chairperson of the National Human Rights Commission of India. He was the first judge from Kerala to become the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. His tenure lasting more than three years has been one of the longest in the Supreme Court of India. While being Chief Justice of Gujarat High Court,he was appointed the acting governor of Gujarat from 16 January 1999 to 18 March 1999. In 2010,he was conferred with an honorary doctorate by Cochin University of Science and Technology.
Ranganath Misra was the 21st Chief Justice of India,serving from 25 September 1990 to 24 November 1991. He was also the first chairman of the National Human Rights Commission of India. He also served as Member of Parliament in Rajya Sabha from the Congress Party between 1998 and 2004. He is the second Supreme court judge to become a Rajya Sabha member after Baharul Islam who was also elected as Indian National Congress member.
Altamas Kabir was an Indian lawyer and judge who served as the 39th Chief Justice of India.
Jasti Chelameswar is a former judge of the Supreme Court of India. He retired on 22 June 2018 as the second most senior supreme court judge. He previously served as the chief justice of the Kerala High Court from 2010 to 2011 and the Gauhati High Court from 2007 to 2010. He was also one of the four judges who held a controversial press conference against Chief Justice Dipak Misra.
Ranjan Gogoi is an Indian former advocate and judge who served as the 46th Chief Justice of India from 2018 to 2019,having previously served as a Judge of the Supreme Court of India from 2012 to 2018. He is currently a Member of the Rajya Sabha,having been nominated by President Ram Nath Kovind on 16 March 2020. Gogoi served as a judge in the Gauhati High Court from 2001 to 2010,and then was transferred as a judge to the Punjab and Haryana High Court from 2010 to 2011 where he later was the Chief Justice from 2011 to 2012. He is also a member of the Committee on External Affairs in the Rajya Sabha.
Dipak Misra is an Indian jurist who served as the 45th Chief Justice of India from 28 August 2017 till 2 October 2018. He is also former Chief Justice of the Patna High Court and Delhi High Court. He is the nephew of Justice Ranganath Misra,who was the 21st Chief Justice from 1990 to 1991.
The Indian Judicial Collegium system,where existing judges appoint judges to the nation's constitutional courts,has its genesis in,and continued basis resting on,three of its own judgments made by Supreme Court judges,which are collectively known as the Three Judges Cases. The collegium system has often been alleged to have caste bias due to the lack of representation of marginalised communities,i.e.,OBCs,SCs and STs,in the Supreme Court and high courts.
Palanisamy Sathasivam is an Indian judge who served as the 40th Chief Justice of India,holding the office from 2013 to 2014. On retirement from his judicial career,Sathasivam was appointed the 21st Governor of Kerala from 5 September 2014 to 4 September 2019. Sathasivam is the second judge from Tamil Nadu to become the CJI,after M. Patanjali Sastri. He is also the first former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court to be appointed the Governor of a state. He is the first Governor of Kerala to be appointed by the Narendra Modi Government.
Sharad Arvind Bobde is an Indian judge who served as the 47th Chief Justice of India from 18 November 2019 to 23 April 2021.
Indu Malhotra is a retired judge and senior counsel of the Supreme Court of India. She was the second woman to be designated as senior advocate by the Supreme Court. She was the first woman advocate to be elevated as a judge of the Supreme Court of India directly from the bar. She also authored the third edition of The Law and Practice of Arbitration and Conciliation (2014).
Uday Umesh Lalit is an Indian lawyer and former Supreme Court Judge,who served as the 49th Chief Justice of India. Previously,he has served as a judge of Supreme Court of India. Prior to his elevation as a judge of the supreme court,he practised as a senior advocate at the Supreme Court. Justice Lalit is one of the eleven senior counsels who have been directly elevated to the Supreme Court. He is currently ‘Distinguished Visiting Professor’at Ashank Desai Centre for Policy Studies,Indian Institute of Technology,Bombay and Distinguished Visiting Professor at West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences.
The National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) was a proposed body which would have been responsible for the recruitment,appointment and transfer of judicial officers,legal officers and legal employees under the government of India and in all state governments of India. The commission was established by amending the Constitution of India through the 99th constitution amendment with the Constitution (Ninety-Ninth Amendment) Act,2014 or 99th Constitutional Amendment Act-2014 passed by the Lok Sabha on 13 August 2014 and by the Rajya Sabha on 14 August 2014. The NJAC would have replaced the collegium system for the appointment of judges as invoked by the Supreme Court via judicial fiat by a new system. Along with the Constitution Amendment Act,the National Judicial Appointments Commission Act,2014,was also passed by the Parliament of India to regulate the functions of the National Judicial Appointments Commission. The NJAC Bill and the Constitutional Amendment Bill,was ratified by 16 of the state legislatures in India,and subsequently assented by the President of India Pranab Mukherjee on 31 December 2014. The NJAC Act and the Constitutional Amendment Act came into force from 13 April 2015.
Brijgopal Harkishan Loya was an Indian judge who served in a special court which deals with matters relating to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). He was presiding over the Sohrabuddin Sheikh case,and died on 1 December 2014 in Nagpur. A bench of the Supreme Court of India,headed by the Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra,on April 19,2018,dismissed the public interest petition (PIL),and stated the death to be natural and such petitions to be an attack on the Judiciary.
The Supreme Court of India was in crisis after a press conference was given by Supreme Court judges Jasti Chelameswar,Ranjan Gogoi,Madan Lokur,and Kurian Joseph,in which they spoke against the Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra that he allocated certain politically controversial cases to such benches which give favourable judgements towards a political party.
Narayan Shukla(born 18 July 1958) also known as SN Shukla was an Allahabad High Court Judge. The Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra has written to the President of India recommending his removal for his alleged involvement in the medical college admission scam.
Justice Arindam Lodh is an Indian Judge at the High Court of Tripura since May 2018. He is due to retire not earlier than March 2025.
Justice Ravindra Maithani is an Indian Judge at the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital since December 2018. He is due to retire not earlier than June 2027.
Ujjawal &Anr. versus State of Haryana&Ors.(2021),a case where Punjab and Haryana High Court,refused to provide police protection to a couple facing threat to their lives and personal liberty,citing potential disruption to "social fabric of the society."