Kenneth Komoski

Last updated

Kenneth Komoski was an educational advocate, nonprofit executive, and former teacher. He died November 15, 2017, aged 89. [1] Komoski served as head of the Center for Programmed Instruction [2] and the Educational Products Information Exchange Institute. [3] In 1964, Life Magazine named him to their list of Young Leaders of the Big Breakthrough. The magazine noted that he "was among the first to explore the new field of education by teaching-machines, such as keyboard devices, microfilm, and computers". [4] Several years later, Komoski coined the term "learner verification and revision" for formative evaluation and modification of instructional materials (aka field testing with learners). [5] His work in educational technology led the International Society for Performance Improvement to award him their Honorary Lifetime Member Award in 1979. [6]

Contents

Early life and education

Komoski was born in the Heights section of Jersey City, New Jersey in 1928. He graduated from Morristown School (now Morristown-Beard School) in Morristown, New Jersey in 1947. Komoski then completed a bachelor's degree and a master's degree in history and philosophy at Acadia University in Wolfville, Nova Scotia, Canada. [7] Komoski also studied at the Union Theological Seminary affiliated with Columbia University in Manhattan. [8]

After graduating from Acadia University, Komoski returned to Morristown School to work as a teacher. He then taught social studies at the Collegiate School in New York City and served as head of its middle school. Komoski later served as the director of the Automated Teaching Project at the Collegiate School. [9] Begun during the late 1950s, this project led efforts to test programmed instruction in both elementary schools and secondary schools. Faculty members programmed machines that asked students' questions and then presented them within immediate answers to facilitate learning. [8] While working at the Collegiate School, Komoski participated as one of 27 invited educators at the 1960 Designs For Learning national conference in Sarasota, Florida. Run by the Ford Foundation's Educational Facilities Laboratories, the conference discussed school designs to meet changing educational needs. [10]

Career in educational development and technology

In 1961, Komoski began working as president of the Center for Programmed Instruction (CPI). Started as an independent nonprofit organization, the center affiliated with the Institute for Educational Technology at Columbia's Teachers College. Funded by the Carnegie Corporation of New York, CPI supported the development of programmed instruction as a practice. [11] Komoski later served as associate executive director of the Institute for Educational Technology [12] and adjunct associate professor of education at Columbia. [13] While at Columbia, Komoski authored the first publication to document that many educational materials did not undergo field testing. Developers did not revise the materials with feedback from real learners. [5]

During the 1960s, Komoski consulted on educational technology for UNESCO (the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization). He taught workshops on programmed instruction in Ramallah, Jordan (now a Palestinian city in the West Bank) and Ibadan, Nigeria. [14] Komoski later consulted for the U.S. Department of State [5] and President Lyndon B. Johnson's Commission on Instructional Technology. In 1970, Komoski authored the report "Toward the Development of Effective Instructional Technology for American Education". This work served as a supporting paper for the 1970 Commission's final report to the President and Congress. [15]

In 1983, Komoski began hosting the half-hour TV show Educational Computing on PBS. Funded by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, the show discussed how computers support learning in classrooms and at home. Educational Computing featured news stories, interviews, and demonstrations of recommended educational software. Episodes also discussed computer networking and the digital divide separating poor school districts from districts with more resources. [16]

EPIE Institute

In 1967, Komoski authored Development of a System for An Educational Products Information Exchange. [17] This report discussed a long-term federally funded study on the development of an exchange to evaluate educational products. The findings led Komoski to co-found the Educational Products Information Exchange Institute (EPIE Institute) and serve as its executive director. [18] The EPIE Institute developed model practices for whole curriculum approaches to align curriculum with learning goals and evaluate learning resources. [19] It also reviewed and evaluated teaching aids and educational technology. [20] In 1982, the EPIE Institute began a partnership with the Consumers Union, the producer of Consumer Reports . The two organizations jointly produced the Pro/Files series of reports to evaluate computers, software, and accessory equipment. [21] Funding from the Richard Lounsbery Foundation and the Ford Foundation supported the project. [22]

During the mid-1990s, the EPIE Institute helped to found the Learning and Information Networking for Community Through Technology (LINCT) Coalition. The Institute then served as LINCT's managing partner organization working with law professor Edgar S. Cahn (the creator of time banking) and researcher Curtiss Priest. LINCT operated as a nonprofit coalition of socially-concerned organizations working with businesses, schools, libraries, governments, and social service agencies. [23]

In 1996, the EPIE Institute published Creating Learning Communities: Practical, Universal Networking for Learning in Schools and Homes. Co-authored by Komoski and Priest, the report presented the findings of a two-year research study on the development of intentional educational networks. The MacArthur Foundation funded this work to support collaborations among schools and their communities. [24]

Work to address the digital divide

In 1983, Komoski launched the Excellence and Equity in Electronic Education (4E) project at the EPIE Institute. Funded by a San Francisco Foundation grant, 4E taught schools how to train parents on the use of computers to support home learning. The project also sought to help low-income families attain computers for use at home. [25]

During the mid to late 1980s and early 1990s, Komoski consulted for networking projects in Battle Creek, Michigan and Indian River County, Florida that connected schools and local communities. [8] The work led him to publish "The 81% Solution" in Education Week , which discussed challenges in addressing learning needs through technology. The article noted that children spend most of their time (81 percent) at home and only 19 percent of their time at school. Komoski proposed the use of community networks to help meet the learning needs of children, particularly at-risk youth from poorer communities. He also suggested ways in which children and families could earn computers donated from businesses while developing their skills. [26]

The ideas proposed in the "81 Percent Solution" later facilitated the work of LINCT to create solutions to address the digital divide. During the mid- and late 1990s, LINCT developed Learn and Earn programs for children and their families, low-wage workers, and unemployed persons. Participants in the programs learned skills in areas such as word processing, spreadsheet use, and use of the Internet and World Wide Web. After completing the Learn and Earn programs, they could bring home a computer for use at home. LINCT piloted Learn and Earn in the New York City metropolitan area in partnership with the Urban League [27] and other community organizations. The success of this program influenced the development of similar programs in Los Angeles, Denver, and Phoenix. [28] These programs later scaled down during the early and mid 2000s because of government funding cuts. [29]

In 2012, Komoski started EPIE's Digital Age Family Literacy Program (DAFLP) at Southampton Intermediate School in Southampton, New York. DAFLP runs a 12-week computing course for families of non-native English-speakers on Long Island. Participants earn home use of their laptop computer after completing the program. [29]

Federal conferences

In 1970, Komoski chaired the Forum on Educational Technology at the White House Conference on Children in Washington, D.C. Led by Stephen H. Hess, the conference discussed the needs of children aged birth to 13. The discussions in the Educational Technology Forum led to recommendations to incorporate educational technology in all federal education programs and Congressional legislation. Recommendations also suggested ways to strengthen individualized learning and incorporate educational technology into the proposed U.S. National Institute of Education. [30] Komoski consulted for the study on the development of the Institute funded by the Rand Corporation. [31]

In 1976, Komoski presented at the Educating All Handicapped Children Conference (EAHCC) in Annapolis, Maryland at the invitation of Elwood L. Bland. Bland headed the Learning Resource Division of the Bureau of Education of the Handicapped (now the Office of Special Education Programs.) The EAHCC conference discussed implications for the use of educational technology to support implementation of the Education for All Handicapped Children Act. (Passed in 1975, the act changed to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act in 1990.) Komoski's presentation discussed the evaluation of instructional materials to improve classroom instruction for students with disabilities. [32]

Two years later, Komoski presented on "Publishers Responsibilities in Meeting the Continuing Challenge of Literacy" at the National Right to Read Conference. Run by the Institute for Advanced Study under contract with the U.S. Office of Education, the conference had a theme of Literacy: Meeting the Challenge. The conference organizers later published Komoski's presentation in an eight-part series of proceedings. [33]

Congressional testimony

In 1971, Komoski testified before the Select Committee on Education of the House Committee on Education and Labor (now the Committee on Education and the Workforce). The Congressional hearing discussed legislation to establish the U.S. National Institute of Education in the Office of Education of the U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. [5] (Federal educational agencies now stand alone as the U.S. Department of Education). In 1992, Komoski testified again before the House Subcommittee on Education. This hearing discussed legislation to reauthorize the Office of Educational Research and Improvement in the U.S. Department of Education. [34]

Jazz and tennis

Komoski worked as a jazz singer-songwriter and as a tennis pro. [35] He also served as vice president of the United States National Lawn Tennis Association (now the United States Tennis Association). [36]

Related Research Articles

Educational software is a term used for any computer software that is made for an educational purpose. It encompasses different ranges from language learning software to classroom management software to reference software. The purpose of all this software is to make some part of education more effective and efficient.

Educational games are games explicitly designed with educational purposes, or which have incidental or secondary educational value. All types of games may be used in an educational environment, however educational games are games that are designed to help people learn about certain subjects, expand concepts, reinforce development, understand a historical event or culture, or assist them in learning a skill as they play. Game types include board, card, and video games.

Situated learning is a theory that explains an individual's acquisition of professional skills and includes research on apprenticeship into how legitimate peripheral participation leads to membership in a community of practice. Situated learning "takes as its focus the relationship between learning and the social situation in which it occurs".

Collaborative learning is a situation in which two or more people learn or attempt to learn something together. Unlike individual learning, people engaged in collaborative learning capitalize on one another's resources and skills. More specifically, collaborative learning is based on the model that knowledge can be created within a population where members actively interact by sharing experiences and take on asymmetric roles. Put differently, collaborative learning refers to methodologies and environments in which learners engage in a common task where each individual depends on and is accountable to each other. These include both face-to-face conversations and computer discussions. Methods for examining collaborative learning processes include conversation analysis and statistical discourse analysis.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constructivism (philosophy of education)</span> Philosophical viewpoint about the nature of knowledge; theory of knowledge

Constructivism in education is a theory that suggests that learners do not passively acquire knowledge through direct instruction. Instead, they construct their understanding through experiences and social interaction, integrating new information with their existing knowledge. This theory originates from Swiss developmental psychologist Jean Piaget's theory of cognitive development.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Asynchronous learning</span> Learning that occurs on each individual students time

Asynchronous learning is a general term used to describe forms of education, instruction, and learning that do not occur in the same place or at the same time. It uses resources that facilitate information sharing outside the constraints of time and place among a network of people. In many instances, well-constructed asynchronous learning is based on constructivist theory, a student-centered approach that emphasizes the importance of peer-to-peer interactions. This approach combines self-study with asynchronous interactions to promote learning, and it can be used to facilitate learning in traditional on-campus education, distance education, and continuing education. This combined network of learners and the electronic network in which they communicate are referred to as an asynchronous learning network.

A learning management system (LMS) or virtual learning environment (VLE) is a software application for the administration, documentation, tracking, reporting, automation, and delivery of educational courses, training programs, materials or learning and development programs. The learning management system concept emerged directly from e-Learning. Learning management systems make up the largest segment of the learning system market. The first introduction of the LMS was in the late 1990s. LMSs have been adopted by almost all higher education institutions in the English-speaking world. Learning management systems have faced a massive growth in usage due to the emphasis on remote learning during the COVID-19 pandemic.

This is an index of education articles.

Educational technology is the combined use of computer hardware, software, and educational theory and practice to facilitate learning. When referred to with its abbreviation, "EdTech," it often refers to the industry of companies that create educational technology. In EdTech Inc.: Selling, Automating and Globalizing Higher Education in the Digital Age, Tanner Mirrlees and Shahid Alvi (2019) argue "EdTech is no exception to industry ownership and market rules" and "define the EdTech industries as all the privately owned companies currently involved in the financing, production and distribution of commercial hardware, software, cultural goods, services and platforms for the educational market with the goal of turning a profit. Many of these companies are US-based and rapidly expanding into educational markets across North America, and increasingly growing all over the world."

Technology integration is defined as the use of technology to enhance and support the educational environment. Technology integration in the classroom can also support classroom instruction by creating opportunities for students to complete assignments on the computer rather than with normal pencil and paper. In a larger sense, technology integration can also refer to the use of an integration platform and application programming interface (API) in the management of a school, to integrate disparate SaaS applications, databases, and programs used by an educational institution so that their data can be shared in real-time across all systems on campus, thus supporting students' education by improving data quality and access for faculty and staff.

"Curriculum integration with the use of technology involves the infusion of technology as a tool to enhance the learning in a content area or multidisciplinary setting... Effective technology integration is achieved when students can select technology tools to help them obtain information on time, analyze and synthesize it, and present it professionally to an authentic audience. Technology should become an integral part of how the classroom functions—as accessible as all other classroom tools. The focus in each lesson or unit is the curriculum outcome, not the technology."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Education in South Africa</span> Overview of education in South Africa

Educational Systems in S.A

An intelligent tutoring system (ITS) is a computer system that imitates human tutors and aims to provide immediate and customized instruction or feedback to learners, usually without requiring intervention from a human teacher. ITSs have the common goal of enabling learning in a meaningful and effective manner by using a variety of computing technologies. There are many examples of ITSs being used in both formal education and professional settings in which they have demonstrated their capabilities and limitations. There is a close relationship between intelligent tutoring, cognitive learning theories and design; and there is ongoing research to improve the effectiveness of ITS. An ITS typically aims to replicate the demonstrated benefits of one-to-one, personalized tutoring, in contexts where students would otherwise have access to one-to-many instruction from a single teacher, or no teacher at all. ITSs are often designed with the goal of providing access to high quality education to each and every student.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">School library</span> Library within a school

A school library is a library within a school where students, staff, and often, parents of a public or private school have access to a variety of resources. The goal of the school library media center is to ensure that all members of the school community have equitable access "to books and reading, to information, and to information technology." A school library media center "uses all types of media... is automated, and utilizes the Internet [as well as books] for information gathering." School libraries are distinct from public libraries because they serve as "learner-oriented laboratories which support, extend, and individualize the school's curriculum... A school library serves as the center and coordinating agency for all material used in the school."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">University of Florida College of Education</span> College of the University of Florida

The University of Florida College of Education is the teacher's college, or normal school, of the University of Florida. The College of Education is located on the eastern portion of the university's Gainesville, Florida, campus in Norman Hall, and offers specializations in special education, higher education, educational policy, elementary education, counseling, teaching, and other educational programs. It is consistently ranked one of the top schools of education in the nation. The college was officially founded in 1906. In fiscal year 2020, the College of Education generated $102.8 million in research funding.

WestEd is a San Francisco-based nonprofit organization. The organization's mission states, "WestEd, a research, development, and services agency, works with education and other communities to promote excellence, achieve equity, and improve learning for children, youth, and adults."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of virtual learning environments</span> Home

A Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) is a system specifically designed to facilitate the management of educational courses by teachers for their students. It predominantly relies on computer hardware and software, enabling distance learning. In North America, this concept is commonly denoted as a "Learning Management System" (LMS).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Evidence-based education</span> Paradigm of the education field

Evidence-based education (EBE) is the principle that education practices should be based on the best available scientific evidence, with randomised trials as the gold standard of evidence, rather than tradition, personal judgement, or other influences. Evidence-based education is related to evidence-based teaching, evidence-based learning, and school effectiveness research.

Learning analytics is the measurement, collection, analysis and reporting of data about learners and their contexts, for purposes of understanding and optimizing learning and the environments in which it occurs. The growth of online learning since the 1990s, particularly in higher education, has contributed to the advancement of Learning Analytics as student data can be captured and made available for analysis. When learners use an LMS, social media, or similar online tools, their clicks, navigation patterns, time on task, social networks, information flow, and concept development through discussions can be tracked. The rapid development of massive open online courses (MOOCs) offers additional data for researchers to evaluate teaching and learning in online environments.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Online learning in higher education</span> Development in distance education that began in the mid-1980s

Online learning involves courses offered by primary institutions that are 100% virtual. Online learning, or virtual classes offered over the internet, is contrasted with traditional courses taken in a brick-and-mortar school building. It is a development in distance education that expanded in the 1990s with the spread of the commercial Internet and the World Wide Web. The learner experience is typically asynchronous but may also incorporate synchronous elements. The vast majority of institutions utilize a learning management system for the administration of online courses. As theories of distance education evolve, digital technologies to support learning and pedagogy continue to transform as well.

Information Communications Technology is usually included in the Home Economics and Livelihood Education program in grade school and taught through the Technology and Home Economics program in high school. The recent status of ICT education in the Philippines, along with other Southeast Asian countries, was surveyed by the Southeast Asian Ministers of Education Organization (SEAMEO) in 2011. Using the UNESCO model of ICT Development in Education, the countries were ranked as Emerging, Applying, Infusing or Transforming. The Philippines were ranked at the Infusing stage of integrating ICT in education, indicating that the country has integrated ICT into existing teaching, learning and administrative practices and policies. This includes components such as a national vision of ICT in education, national ICT plans and policies, complementary national ICT and education policies, professional development for teachers and school leaders, community or partnership and teaching and learning pedagogies. A 2012 study reported that public high schools in Metro Manila had a computer to student ratio of 1:63. While 88 percent of schools have internet connections, half of the students claimed not to be using it.

References

  1. ↑ "Paul Kenneth Komoski Of Southampton Dies November 15 - Southampton - 27east". www.27east.com. Archived from the original on November 28, 2017.
  2. ↑ Currivan, Gene (March 4, 1961). "EDUCATOR SCORES TEACHER MACHINE; Says Device Is as Yet So Unflexible It Can Hobble the Human Instructor". The New York Times.
  3. ↑ Sims, Calvin (August 2, 1987). "Lessons in Picking Software to Learn By". The New York Times.
  4. ↑ "Introducing the Generation; A Foldout Gallery: Young Leaders of the Breakthrough". Life Magazine. 53 (11): 4. September 14, 1962.
  5. 1 2 3 4 U.S. Congress, House Committee on Education and Labor, Select Subcommittee on Education (1971). To Establish a National Institute of Education: Hearings, Ninety-second Congress, First Session, on H.R. 33, H.R. 3606, and Other Related Bills ... GPO. p. 333.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  6. ↑ "Honorary Award Recipients".
  7. ↑ Lesh, Ann Ryan (December 2, 1950). "Engagements in Eisaman, Baker, Ridall, Armstrong, Parrish Families". The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.
  8. 1 2 3 Euchner, Charlie (1983). "Kenneth Komoski Helps Wary 'Consumers' By Evaluating Computer Products for Schools". Education Week (February 2).
  9. ↑ "Teachers Meeting Set Today". The Oneonta Star. January 19, 1961. p. 5.
  10. ↑ Gardner, John (November 15, 1960). "Educators to Discuss Schools of Future". The St. Petersburg Times.
  11. ↑ Bell, Joseph N. (1961). "Will Robots Teach Your Children?". Popular Mechanics. 116 (4): 157.
  12. ↑ Komoski, Kenneth (1966). A Demonstration Project of Programmed Television Instruction. Institute for Educational Technology, Teachers College, Columbia University.
  13. ↑ Freedman, Alix M. (November 15, 1981). "ELECTRONIC GAMES: DO THEY HELP?". The New York Times.
  14. ↑ Komoski, P. Kenneth; Green, Edward J. (1964). Programmed Instruction in West Africa and the Arab States: A Report on Two Training Workshops. United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization.
  15. ↑ Komoski, Kenneth (1970). Toward the Development of Effective Instructional Technology for American Education (PDF) (Report). Bureau of Research, Office of Education, Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
  16. ↑ "Television Discovers Computers; A Glut of Shows Aimed at Novices and Experienced Users". InfoWorld. 6 (41): 41. 1984.
  17. ↑ Development of a System for An Educational Products Information Exchange (Report). Bureau of Education Research, Office of Education, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. November 10, 1967.
  18. ↑ Fine, Benjamin (October 17, 1967). "Inferior Educational Materials Fool Teachers". Sarasota Journal.
  19. ↑ Komosmi, P. Kenneth (1990). "Needed: A Whole Curriculum Approach" (PDF). Educational Leadership (February issue).
  20. ↑ Fiske, Edward R. (August 13, 1975). "About Education; Institute Runs Tests On Educational Aids". The New York Times.
  21. ↑ Heichinger, Fred M. (December 7, 1982). "About Education". The New York Times.
  22. ↑ Mace, Scott (November 29, 1982). "Consumer Reports affiliate acts as educational-software watchdog". InfoWorld. 4 (47).
  23. ↑ "Learning and Information Network for Community Telecomputing".
  24. ↑ Komoski, Kenneth; Priest, Curtiss (1996). 'Creating Learning Communities: Practical, Universal Networking for Learning in Schools and Home (Report). EPIE Institute.
  25. ↑ Mace, Scott (August 8, 1983). "EPIE Launches Synergetic Home/School Program". InfoWorld. 5 (32): 16–17.
  26. ↑ Komoski, Kenneth (January 26, 1994). "The 81% Solution". Education Week. 13 (18): 52.
  27. ↑ Jones, Charissa (August 3, 1996). "Power Through Cyberspace". The New York Times.
  28. ↑ Harrington, Mark (December 9, 2001). "A Hand Up / LINCT's Computers 101 gives jobless participants set of skills they can work with". Newsday.
  29. 1 2 Weaver, Shaye (March 25, 2013). "Tuckahoe And Southampton Schools Offer Incentive For English Learners". The Southampton Press.
  30. ↑ Report to the President: White House Conference on Children. Government Printing Office. 1970.
  31. ↑ Levien, Roger E. (1971). National Institute of Education: Proposed Plan for the Institute (PDF) (Report). Rand Corporation.
  32. ↑ Robert Heinich, ed. (1976). Educating All Handicapped Children. pp. 187–226.
  33. ↑ Komoski, Kenneth (1978). Publishers Responsibilities in Meeting the Continuing Challenge of Literacy (PDF). 1978 National Right to Read Conference. Government Printing Office.
  34. ↑ U.S. Congress, House Committee on Education and Labor, Select Subcommittee on Education (1992). Hearings on reauthorization of the Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI): hearings before the Subcommittee on Education of the Committee on Education and Labor, House of Representatives, One Hundred Second Congress, second session, hearings held in Washington, DC, March 17 and 18, 1992, Volume 4. GPO. p. 107.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  35. ↑ Harrington, Mark (June 16, 2004). "Hard Drive to Save Program". Newsday.
  36. ↑ The Nation's Schools. 67. McGraw Hill: 75. 1961.{{cite journal}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.