Localizer type directional aid

Last updated

A localizer type directional aid (LDA) or Instrument Guidance System (IGS) is a type of localizer-based instrument approach to an airport. It is used in places where, due to terrain and other factors, the localizer antenna array is not aligned with the runway it serves. In these cases, the localizer antenna array may be offset (i.e. pointed or aimed) in such a way that the approach course it projects no longer lies along the extended runway centerline (which is the norm for non-offset and non-LDA localizer systems). If the angle of offset is three degrees or less, the facility is classified as an offset localizer. If the offset angle is greater than three degrees, the facility is classified as a localizer-type directional aid (LDA). Straight-in approaches may be published if the offset angle does not exceed 30 degrees. Only circling minima are published for offset angles greater than 30 degrees. As a "directional aid", and only a Category I (CAT I) approach, rather than a full-fledged instrument landing system (ILS), the LDA is more commonly used to help the pilot safely reach a point near the runway environs, where he or she hopefully can see the runway, at which point he or she will proceed and land visually, as opposed to (for example) full Category III (CAT III) ILS systems that allow a pilot to fly, without visual references, very close to the runway surface (usually about 100 ft) depending on the exact equipment in the aircraft and on the ground.

Contents

An LDA uses exactly the same equipment to create the course as a standard localizer used in ILS. An LDA approach also is designed with a normal course width, which is typically 3 to 6 degrees. (At each "edge-of-course", commonly 1.5 or 3 degrees left and right of course, the transmitted signal is created in such a way as to ensure full-scale CDI needle deflection at and beyond these edges, so the pilot will never falsely believe they are intercepting the course outside of the actual course area. The area between these full-scale needle deflections is what defines the course width.) An LDA approach (considered a non-precision approach) may have one or more marker beacons, perhaps a DME, and in rare instances a glide slope, just as other precision approaches have, such as ILS approaches.

If the offset is not greater than 30 degrees, straight-in approach minima may be published; circling minima only are published when offset exceeds 30 degrees. [1] [2]

List of LDA approaches in the United States

The following 25 LDA approaches are available in the United States (as of November 2023): [3] [4] [5]

  1. PAJN, LDA X RWY 08, Juneau International Airport, Juneau, AK
  2. PAPG, LDA/DME-D, Petersburg James A. Johnson Airport, Petersburg, AK
  3. PASI, LDA/DME RWY 11, Sitka Rocky Gutierrez Airport, Sitka, AK
  4. PAVD, LDA/DME-H, Valdez Pioneer Field, Valdez, AK
  5. PAWG, LDA/DME-C and LDA/DME-D, Wrangell Airport, Wrangell, AK
  6. KFYV, LDA/DME RWY 34, Drake Field, Fayetteville, AR
  7. KBIH, LDA/DME RWY 17, Eastern Sierra Regional Airport, Bishop, CA
  8. KCCR, LDA RWY 19R, Buchanan Field, Concord, CA
  9. KSNA, LDA/DME RWY 20R, John Wayne Airport–Orange County, Santa Ana, CA
  10. KTVL, LDA RWY 18, Lake Tahoe Airport, South Lake Tahoe, CA
  11. KVNY, LDA-C, Van Nuys Airport, Van Nuys, CA
  12. KEGE, LDA/DME RWY 25, Eagle County Regional Airport, Eagle, CO
  13. KGJT, LDA/DME RWY 29, Grand Junction Regional Airport, Grand Junction, CO
  14. KHFD, LDA RWY 02, Hartford–Brainard Airport, Hartford, CT
  15. KDCA, LDA Y RWY 19, Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport, Washington, DC (No longer in use) [6]
  16. KDCA, LDA Z RWY 19, Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport, Washington, DC
  17. PHNL, LDA/DME RWY 26L, Honolulu International Airport, Honolulu, HI
  18. KEKO, LDA/DME RWY 24, Elko Regional Airport, Elko, NV
  19. KDLS, LDA/DME RWY 25 and COPTER LDA/DME RWY 25, Columbia Gorge Regional Airport, The Dalles, OR
  20. KAMA, LDA/DME RWY 22, Rick Husband Amarillo International Airport, Amarillo, TX
  21. KSGU, LDA/DME RWY 19, St. George Regional Airport, Saint George, UT
  22. KSLC, LDA/DME RWY 35, Salt Lake City International Airport, Salt Lake City, UT
  23. KROA, LDA Y RWY 06 and LDA Z RWY 06, Roanoke Regional Airport, Roanoke, VA
  24. KEKN, LDA-C, Elkins–Randolph County–Jennings Randolph Field, Elkins, WV
  25. W99, LDA/DME-B, Grant County Airport, Petersburg, WV

List of LDA approaches outside the United States

This list is incomplete
  1. BIAR, LDA RWY 01, offset 26°, Akureyri Airport, Akureyri, Iceland
  2. EKVG, LDA RWYs 12 & 30, offset 14° & 2° respectively, Vágar Airport, Vágar, Faroe Islands
  3. LQMO, IGS RWY 33, offset 21°, Mostar Airport, Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  4. LYTV, LDA RWY 32, offset 20°, Tivat Airport, Tivat, Montenegro
  5. LSGS, IGS RWY 25, offset 6.5° Sion Airport, Sion, Switzerland
  6. NVVV, LDA RWY 11, offset 26°, Bauerfield International Airport, Port Vila, Vanuatu
  7. RJTT, LDA RWYs 22 & 23, offset 55° & 48° respectively, Tokyo International Airport, Tokyo, Japan
  8. RCBS, LDA RWY 24, offset 15°, Kinmen Airport, Kinmen, Taiwan
  9. RCFN, LDA RWY 04, offset 15°, Fongnian Airport, Taitung, Taiwan
  10. RCSS, LDA RWY 28, offset 8°, Taipei Songshan Airport, Taipei, Taiwan

List of decommissioned LDA approaches

This list is incomplete
  1. (X)VHHH, IGS RWY 13, Kai Tak Airport, Kowloon Bay, Hong Kong
  2. LLBG, LDA RWY 30, offset 11°, Ben Gurion Airport, Tel Aviv, Israel
  3. KVUO, LDA-A, Pearson Field, Vancouver, WA

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Instrument flight rules</span> Civil aviation regulations for flight on instruments

In aviation, instrument flight rules (IFR) is one of two sets of regulations governing all aspects of civil aviation aircraft operations; the other is visual flight rules (VFR).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Instrument landing system</span> Ground-based visual aid for landing

In aviation, the instrument landing system (ILS) is a precision radio navigation system that provides short-range guidance to aircraft to allow them to approach a runway at night or in bad weather. In its original form, it allows an aircraft to approach until it is 200 feet (61 m) over the ground, within a 12 mile (800 m) of the runway. At that point the runway should be visible to the pilot; if it is not, they perform a missed approach. Bringing the aircraft this close to the runway dramatically increases the range of weather conditions in which a safe landing can be made. Other versions of the system, or "categories", have further reduced the minimum altitudes, runway visual ranges (RVRs), and transmitter and monitoring configurations designed depending on the normal expected weather patterns and airport safety requirements.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Non-directional beacon</span> Radio transmitter which emits radio waves in all directions, used as a navigational aid

A non-directional beacon (NDB) or non-directional radio beacon is a radio beacon which does not include inherent directional information. Radio beacons are radio transmitters at a known location, used as an aviation or marine navigational aid. NDB are in contrast to directional radio beacons and other navigational aids, such as low-frequency radio range, VHF omnidirectional range (VOR) and tactical air navigation system (TACAN).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">VHF omnidirectional range</span> Aviation navigation system

Very High Frequency Omnidirectional Range Station (VOR) is a type of short-range radio navigation system for aircraft, enabling aircraft with a receiving unit to determine its position and stay on course by receiving radio signals transmitted by a network of fixed ground radio beacons. It uses frequencies in the very high frequency (VHF) band from 108.00 to 117.95 MHz. Developed in the United States beginning in 1937 and deployed by 1946, VOR became the standard air navigational system in the world, used by both commercial and general aviation, until supplanted by satellite navigation systems such as GPS in the early 21st century. As such, VOR stations are being gradually decommissioned. In 2000 there were about 3,000 VOR stations operating around the world, including 1,033 in the US, but by 2013 the number in the US had been reduced to 967. The United States is decommissioning approximately half of its VOR stations and other legacy navigation aids as part of a move to performance-based navigation, while still retaining a "Minimum Operational Network" of VOR stations as a backup to GPS. In 2015, the UK planned to reduce the number of stations from 44 to 19 by 2020.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Distance measuring equipment</span> Radio navigation technology used in aviation

In aviation, distance measuring equipment (DME) is a radio navigation technology that measures the slant range (distance) between an aircraft and a ground station by timing the propagation delay of radio signals in the frequency band between 960 and 1215 megahertz (MHz). Line-of-visibility between the aircraft and ground station is required. An interrogator (airborne) initiates an exchange by transmitting a pulse pair, on an assigned 'channel', to the transponder ground station. The channel assignment specifies the carrier frequency and the spacing between the pulses. After a known delay, the transponder replies by transmitting a pulse pair on a frequency that is offset from the interrogation frequency by 63 MHz and having specified separation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Instrument landing system localizer</span> Horizontal guidance system

An instrument landing system localizer, or simply localizer, is a system of horizontal guidance in the instrument landing system, which is used to guide aircraft along the axis of the runway.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Instrument approach</span> Aircraft landing procedure

In aviation, an instrument approach or instrument approach procedure (IAP) is a series of predetermined maneuvers for the orderly transfer of an aircraft operating under instrument flight rules from the beginning of the initial approach to a landing, or to a point from which a landing may be made visually. These approaches are approved in the European Union by EASA and the respective country authorities and in the United States by the FAA or the United States Department of Defense for the military. The ICAO defines an instrument approach as "a series of predetermined maneuvers by reference to flight instruments with specific protection from obstacles from the initial approach fix, or where applicable, from the beginning of a defined arrival route to a point from which a landing can be completed and thereafter, if landing is not completed, to a position at which holding or en route obstacle clearance criteria apply."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Microwave landing system</span> All-weather, precision radio guidance system

The microwave landing system (MLS) is an all-weather, precision radio guidance system intended to be installed at large airports to assist aircraft in landing, including 'blind landings'. MLS enables an approaching aircraft to determine when it is aligned with the destination runway and on the correct glidepath for a safe landing. MLS was intended to replace or supplement the instrument landing systems (ILS). MLS has a number of operational advantages over ILS, including a wider selection of channels to avoid interference with nearby installations, excellent performance in all weather, a small "footprint" at the airports, and wide vertical and horizontal "capture" angles that allowed approaches from wider areas around the airport.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Indiana County–Jimmy Stewart Airport</span> Airport in Pennsylvania, US

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marker beacon</span> Type of VHF radio beacon used in aviation

A marker beacon is a particular type of VHF radio beacon used in aviation, usually in conjunction with an instrument landing system (ILS), to give pilots a means to determine position along an established route to a destination such as a runway.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Local-area augmentation system</span> All-weather aircraft landing system

The local-area augmentation system (LAAS) is an all-weather aircraft landing system based on real-time differential correction of the GPS signal. Local reference receivers located around the airport send data to a central location at the airport. This data is used to formulate a correction message, which is then transmitted to users via a VHF Data Link. A receiver on an aircraft uses this information to correct GPS signals, which then provides a standard instrument landing system (ILS)-style display to use while flying a precision approach. The FAA has stopped using the term LAAS and has transitioned to the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) terminology of ground-based augmentation system (GBAS). While the FAA has indefinitely delayed plans for federal GBAS acquisition, the system can be purchased by airports and installed as a Non-Federal navigation aid.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Transponder landing system</span> All-weather, precision landing system

A transponder landing system (TLS) is an all-weather, precision landing system that uses existing airborne transponder and instrument landing system (ILS) equipment to create a precision approach at a location where an ILS would normally not be available.

Augmentation of a global navigation satellite system (GNSS) is a method of improving the navigation system's attributes, such as precision, reliability, and availability, through the integration of external information into the calculation process. There are many such systems in place, and they are generally named or described based on how the GNSS sensor receives the external information. Some systems transmit additional information about sources of error, others provide direct measurements of how much the signal was off in the past, while a third group provides additional vehicle information to be integrated in the calculation process.

Simplified directional facility (SDF) is a localizer-based instrument non-precision approach to an airport, which provides final approach course similar to instrument landing system (ILS) and localizer type directional aid (LDA) approaches, although not as precise.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Final approach</span> Final stage in an aircrafts approach to landing

In aeronautics, the final approach is the last leg in an aircraft's approach to landing, when the aircraft is lined up with the runway and descending for landing. In aviation radio terminology, it is often shortened to "final".

Muscatine Municipal Airport five miles (8 km) southwest of Muscatine, in Muscatine County, Iowa, United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Middleton Municipal Airport</span> Airport

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 450</span> 1975 aviation accident

Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 450, JP 450, was an international charter flight from Tivat in the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia to Prague, Czechoslovakia which crashed in the Prague suburb of Suchdol on October 30, 1975, at 09:20 AM. The McDonnell Douglas DC-9-32 with 115 passengers and 5 crew on board descended, under Instrument Meteorological Conditions (IMC), below defined Minimum Descent Altitude (MDA) during the final approach to Prague Ruzyně Airport RWY 25, entered a gorge above Vltava river, and was unable to outclimb the rising terrain. 75 of the 120 occupants died during the crash itself while 4 others died later in hospital. The accident remains the worst aviation disaster on the Czech Republic soil.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Britannia Airways Flight 105</span> 1966 aviation accident

Britannia Airways Flight 105 was an international tourist chartered flight from London Luton Airport for a flight to Ljubljana Brnik Airport. Passengers were primarily British, most of them going to their vacation in Yugoslavia. The flight was operated by Bristol 175 Britannia 102 aircraft, registration code G-ANBB. The aircraft took off from Luton at 21:10 hours GMT on August 31, 1966, with 110 passengers and 7 crew on board. After an uneventful en route flight, radar contact was lost at 00:47 hours local time on September 1 during the final approach to runway (RWY) 31. The aircraft struck trees in the woods by the village of Nasovče, 2.8 km south east of the RWY 31 threshold and 0.7 km north of the runway extended centreline, under Visual Meteorological Conditions (VMC). 98 of the 117 passengers and crew were killed in the accident.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Air Canada Flight 759</span> 2017 aviation incident

On July 7, 2017, an Airbus A320-211 operating as Air Canada Flight 759 was nearly involved in an accident at San Francisco International Airport in San Mateo County, California, United States. The flight, which originated at Toronto Pearson International Airport, had been cleared by air traffic control to land on runway 28R and was on final approach to land on that runway; however, instead of lining up with the runway, the aircraft had lined up with the parallel taxiway, on which four fully loaded and fueled passenger airplanes were stopped awaiting takeoff clearance. The flight crew initiated a go-around prior to landing, after which it landed without further incident. The aircraft on the taxiway departed for their intended destinations without further incident. The subsequent investigation by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) determined that the Air Canada airplane descended to 59 feet (18 m) above the ground before it began its climb, and that it missed colliding with one of the aircraft on the taxiway by 14 feet (4.3 m).

References

  1. AIM, 1-1-9c2
  2. As of September 2011, there are LDA approaches which have straight-in minima published despite the localizer being offset more than 30 degrees: e.g., "LDA/DME RWY 19" and "ROSSLYN LDA RWY 19" approaches to Runway 19 at DCA have 145 and 147 degrees respectively on their final approach course to the airport.
  3. This count reflects only clearly distinct approaches, i.e. if multiple LDA approach procedures to the same runway are available (all of which use the same localizer) they are counted as one. For instance, KSFO has "LDA/DME RWY 28R" and "LDA PRM RWY 28R (SIMULTANEOUS CLOSE PARALLEL)" approaches, which are essentially two different versions of the same approach, the latter one developed specifically for use in simultaneous parallel approaches to runways 28R (using LDA) and 28L (using ILS or RNAV). On the other hand, KDCA has two different LDA approaches to runway 19, which use different localizers, so they are both counted individually.
  4. "Digital – Terminal Procedures Publication (d-TPP)/Airport Diagrams". FAA . Retrieved 2016-06-06.
  5. "Instrument Flight Procedures Information Gateway". FAA . Retrieved 2016-06-06.
  6. Amendment 5 to DCA’s River Visual Runway 19 approach, June 5, 2015, by the FAA