Maryland Office of Administrative Hearings

Last updated

The Maryland Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) is an independent, central panel agency that holds administrative hearings on behalf of certain agencies of the executive branch of the state government. [1] For example, it may hold hearings pertaining to the suspension or revocation of a driver's license, [2] and it also holds hearings when the Maryland Human Relations Commission determines that there is probable cause to believe that an employer or business has committed an act of discrimination. [3] The OAH conducts hearings in over 60,000 matters each year of which approximately one-half concern issues from the state Motor Vehicle Administration. [4]

Contents

In addition, the OAH provides a mediation service; for example, special education hearing requests often result in mediation. [5] Also, as a pilot project in conjunction with the District Court, it offers mediation of civil disputes in Baltimore County.

The OAH has no state policy making authority, and in hearing a case uses the policies, regulations, and rules of the agency for which the OAH is conducting the hearing. [4] The OAH does have its own rules of procedure [6] which it uses to ensure a uniform application of administrative law in its decisions.

The main offices of the OAH are in Hunt Valley, although it holds hearings in all counties in the state.

Organization and authority

The OAH is headed by a Chief Administrative Law Judge, who is appointed by the governor with the advice and consent of the state senate. [7] The Chief Administrative Law Judge then appoints individual administrative law judges. [7] The Chief Administrative Law Judge and the administrative law judges that he or she appoints both have the authority to hear cases. [7] Administrative law judges have the authority to compel the appearance of witnesses at a hearing. [7] The right of appeal is generally limited to a review of the record of the proceedings before the administrative law judge; that is, if a party appeals the final decision of an administrative law judge to a Maryland circuit court, the court will decide the case based on the evidence that was brought before the administrative law judge, or may order the administrative law judge to conduct further proceedings, but will not conduct a new trial. [8] (Therefore, it is essential that all parties to an administrative hearing be fully prepared.)

The OAH is governed by state law, including title 9 subtitle 16 and title 10 subtitle 2 of the State Government article of the Annotated Code of Maryland.

History

The OAH was created in 1990 by legislation enacted in 1989 to provide impartial and independent administrative law judges to hear agency cases. [4] Prior to that, each Maryland agency conducted its own hearings, an administrative process that was criticized as the deciding officer was either an employee or member of the agency, creating the possibility of a lack of impartiality. [4] In addition, there were no uniform training or qualifications for the 92 hearing examiners that were distributed among the various state agencies. The formation of the OAH allowed for a lesser number of administrative law judges, currently numbering around 60, to receive specialized training on administrative law.

See also

Related Research Articles

United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces Federal tribunal for appeal of lower military courts

The United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces is an Article I court that exercises worldwide appellate jurisdiction over members of the United States Armed Forces on active duty and other persons subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The court is composed of five civilian judges appointed for 15-year terms by the President of the United States with the advice and consent of the United States Senate. The court reviews decisions from the intermediate appellate courts of the services: the Army Court of Criminal Appeals, the Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, the Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals, and the Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals.

Maryland Court of Appeals The highest court in the U.S. state of Maryland

The Court of Appeals of Maryland is the supreme court of the U.S. state of Maryland. The court, which is composed of one chief judge and six associate judges, meets in the Robert C. Murphy Courts of Appeal Building in the state capital, Annapolis. The term of the Court begins the second Monday of September. The Court is unique among American courts in that the judges wear red robes. The Maryland Court of Appeals joins the New York Court of Appeals in being the only two state highest courts to bear the name "Court of Appeals" rather than "Supreme Court".

Government of Maryland


The government of Maryland is conducted according to the Maryland Constitution. The United States is a federation; consequently, the government of Maryland, like the other 49 state governments, has exclusive authority over matters that lie entirely within the state's borders, except as limited by the Constitution of the United States.

The court system of Canada forms the judicial branch of government, formally known as "The Queen on the Bench", which interprets the law and is made up of many courts differing in levels of legal superiority and separated by jurisdiction. Some of the courts are federal in nature, while others are provincial or territorial.

An administrative law judge (ALJ) in the United States is a judge and trier of fact who both presides over trials and adjudicates the claims or disputes involving administrative law.

Judiciary of France Overview of Frances court system

In France, career judges are considered civil servants exercising one of the sovereign powers of the state, so French citizens are eligible for judgeship, but not citizens of the other EU countries. France's independent court system enjoys special statutory protection from the executive branch. Procedures for the appointment, promotion, and removal of judges vary depending on whether it is for the ordinary or administrative stream. Judicial appointments in the judicial stream must be approved by a special panel, the High Council of the Judiciary. Once appointed, career judges serve for life and cannot be removed without specific disciplinary proceedings conducted before the Council with due process.

Judicial system of Finland

Under the Constitution of Finland, everyone is entitled to have their case heard by a court or an authority appropriately and without undue delay. This is achieved through the judicial system of Finland.

An Article 32 hearing is a proceeding under the United States Uniform Code of Military Justice, similar to that of a preliminary hearing in civilian law. Its name is derived from UCMJ section VII Article 32, which mandates the hearing.

Supreme Court of Nepal Highest court in Nepal

The Supreme Court of Nepal is the highest court in Nepal. It has appellate jurisdiction over decisions of the seven High Courts and extraordinary original jurisdiction. The court consists of twenty Justices and one Chief Justice.

Judicial system of Turkey

The judicial system of Turkey is defined by Articles 138 to 160 of the Constitution of Turkey.

Court of Quebec

The Court of Quebec is a court of first instance in the Province of Quebec, Canada.

Executive Office for Immigration Review

The Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) is a sub-agency of the United States Department of Justice whose chief function is to conduct removal proceedings in immigration courts and adjudicate appeals arising from the proceedings. These administrative proceedings determine the removability and admissibility of individuals in the United States. As of February 20, 2020, there were sixty-nine immigration courts throughout the United States.

Judicial system of China

The judicial branch, organized under the constitution and law, is one of five organs of power elected by the People's Congress, in the People's Republic of China.

The Judiciary of Vermont is the state court system of Vermont, charged with Vermont law.

Judiciary of New York (state)

The Judiciary of New York is the judicial branch of the Government of New York, comprising all the courts of the State of New York

The Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania is the unified state court system of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

Judiciary of Italy

In Italy, judges are public officials and, since they exercise one of the sovereign powers of the State, only Italian citizens are eligible for judgeship. In order to become a judge, applicants must obtain a degree of higher education as well as pass written and oral examinations. However, most training and experience is gained through the judicial organization itself. The potential candidates then work their way up from the bottom through promotions. Italy's independent judiciary enjoys special constitutional protection from the executive branch. Once appointed, judges serve for life and cannot be removed without specific disciplinary proceedings conducted in due process before the Consiglio Superiore della Magistratura. The Ministry of Justice handles the administration of courts and judiciary, including paying salaries and constructing new courthouses. The Ministry of Justice and that of the Infrastructures fund and the Ministry of Justice and that of the Interiors administer the prison system. Lastly, the Ministry of Justice receives and processes applications for presidential pardons and proposes legislation dealing with matters of civil or criminal justice.

Eric L. Lipman is an American politician and judge in Minnesota. He served in the Minnesota House of Representatives from 2001 to 2004 as a member of the Republican party, representing district 56B until November 2002 and after redistricting district 56A.

The New York City Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings (OATH) is an administrative office of the New York City government. It is a non-mayoral executive agency and is not part of the state Unified Court System.

The Texas State Office of Administrative Hearings (SOAH)] was created in 1991 by the 72nd Texas Legislature as an independent agency to manage and conduct hearings in contested cases for most licensing and other state agencies. SOAH provides a forum for administrative hearings for agencies without staff to conduct hearings. SOAH derives its authority from Texas Government Code Chapters 2001 and 2003. The Texas legislature empowered administrative law judges (ALJs) employed by SOAH to administer oaths, take testimony, rule on questions of evidence, issue orders relating to discovery and other hearing or pre-hearing matters, and issue proposals for decision including findings of fact and conclusions of law. By statute, SOAH is a state agency; it has statewide jurisdiction, makes its own rules, and determines contested cases. The Texas Legislature clarified SOAH was not an Article 5, Section 1 court, but instead was "created to serve as an independent forum for the conduct of adjudicative hearings in the executive branch of state government." The purpose of SOAH is "to separate the adjudicative function from the investigative, prosecutorial, and policymaking functions in the executive branch in relation to the hearings that the office is authorized to conduct."

References

  1. ↑ Md. Code Ann., State Govt. §§ 10-202, 10-203, 10-205
  2. ↑ "Maryland State Department of Transportation - Motor Vehicle Administration". Archived from the original on 2007-11-10. Retrieved 2008-02-26.
  3. ↑ "Equal Opportunity for All" (PDF). Maryland Commission on Human Relations.
  4. 1 2 3 4 Rochvarg, Arnold (2007). Maryland Administrative Law (2nd ed.). Maryland Institute for Continuing Professional Legal Education of Lawyers. pp. 27–32.External link in |publisher= (help)
  5. ↑ "Maryland OAH 2006 Annual Report" (PDF).
  6. ↑ Code of Maryland Regulations 28.02.01.
  7. 1 2 3 4 Md. Code Ann., State Govt. § 9-1600 et seq., "Office of Administrative Hearings."
  8. ↑ Md. Code Ann., State Govt. § 10-222
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.