Matthew Chapman | |
---|---|
Born | Matthew H. D. Chapman 1950 (age 73–74) Cambridge, England |
Citizenship | American |
Occupation(s) | Writer, film director, journalist |
Spouse | |
Relatives | Charles Darwin, F. M. Cornford, Frances Cornford |
Matthew H. D. Chapman is an English-American journalist, author, screenwriter, director and science activist. As the great-great-grandson of Charles Darwin, he has had a particular interest in the American creationism versus evolution controversy. He has written and directed six films, written two books and numerous screenplays, had articles published in Harper's Magazine and National Geographic among others, and blogged for the Huffington Post . [1]
Matthew Chapman grew up in an English family that attended church and his parents sent him to "schools that mandated daily prayers." [2] His father, Cecil Chapman, was the son of the noted physicist and astronomer, Sydney Chapman, responsible for early research on the nature of the ozone layer. His mother, Clare, was the daughter of the philosophy professor and author Francis Cornford and poet Frances Cornford (née Darwin), the daughter of Francis Darwin. [3]
Growing up in Cambridge, England, Chapman did not give much consideration to the fact that he was the great-great grandson of Charles Darwin. He did feel the pressure to be an academic success. However, he was "a boy who refused to be educated and was kicked out of several schools." Chapman left school at age fifteen. After that, he held various jobs until landing an apprenticeship as a film editor. [4]
According to his book Trials of the Monkey—An Accidental Memoir, Chapman began praying nightly at the age of 7. As fodder for his lengthy prayer sessions, he found magazine and newspaper articles provided "an endless and astonishing vein of human misery from which to mine the elements for [his] nightly pleas." This awareness of human suffering led him to consider becoming a missionary to help others. [5] He decided to read the entire Bible as a first step toward that goal.
When he had read as far as the Book of Leviticus, he was dismayed to discover that God tells Moses to kill homosexual men. At that point in his life, Chapman found his gay uncle, Ben Duncan, and his partner to be "the only truly civilized and loving couple [he] knew." By the age of 9, Chapman had discovered that Leviticus 20:13 was often used by clergy and politicians to justify the incarceration of men like his uncle. [2]
In the 1980's, Chapman moved to the US and became aware of believers in creationism challenging schools over teaching evolution. His interest in this issue grew and led him to write his first book in 2001, Trials of the Monkey—An Accidental Memoir. [2]
In 2005, Harper's Magazine asked Matthew Chapman to cover the Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District case. In that court case, eleven parents successfully sued the school district to prevent creationism (also called intelligent design) from getting equal footing with instruction on evolution in science classes taken by 9th graders. The ruling in the case, issued by Republican Judge John Jones, reprimanded "the [Christian] fundamentalists and their scientific supporters for their intellectual dishonesty.” [2]
During the trial, a journalism colleague from a Harrisburg newspaper reported on the fact that Matthew Chapman was a descendent of Charles Darwin. This led to Chapman being "invited to homes and churches in the area to talk about [his] views, and on a couple of occasions to endure attempts at conversion." [2] He encountered many people who, having been indoctrinated with religious beliefs from childhood, would "choose faith no matter how good the contradictory evidence was." Chapman says that when he left Pennsylvania after the conclusion of the trial, his "journey to atheism [was] complete." [2]
Chapman's experiences covering the Dover trial led him to write his second book, 40 Days and 40 Nights – Darwin, Intelligent Design, God, OxyContin, and Other Oddities on Trial in Pennsylvania, published in 2007. [4]
Chapman's most-famous film, The Ledge , which he wrote and directed, starred Charlie Hunnam, Liv Tyler, Terrence Howard, and Patrick Wilson. The film deals with an intellectual, personal, and ultimately fatal feud between an atheist and an evangelical Christian. An atheist on a ledge is forced to decide whether to die or to see someone he loves killed. According to Chapman, it is "a piece of work that makes the basic intellectual arguments for atheism, but also makes a powerful emotional argument against cruelty of a religious kind" and the "ways people suffer as a result". [6]
Matthew Chapman founded ScienceDebate.org in 2007. His co-founders were fellow screenwriter Shawn Lawrence Otto, science writer Chris Mooney, marine biologist and science blogger Sheril Kirshenbaum, physicist Lawrence Krauss, and philosopher Austin Dacey.
The inspiration for starting Science Debate was Chapman noticing that many of the questions asked of candidates leading up to the 2008 U.S. presidential election focused on values and faith. Chapman felt that including the reality of science policies and the consequences for voters should be addressed as well. During that campaign season, Science Debates was able to obtain responses to 14 science-related questions from candidates Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and John McCain. Similar questionnaires, with up to 20 questions, were given to the final candidates in the 2012 and 2016 elections. In an interview just prior to the 2016 election, Matthew Chapman stated that the Science Debate questions had become "part of the political fabric of getting elected." He hoped that presidential candidates debating science policy would become more important than economic and foreign policy issues. [7] In 2023, Science Debate was rebranded under the name Science on the Ballot and became part of the National Science Policy Network (NSPN). [8]
On 15 November 2011, Matthew Chapman participated in a debate hosted by Open to Debate moderated by John Donvan. Chapman, along with A.C. Grayling, were proponents of the debate topic "the world would be better off without religion." Their opponents were Dinesh D'Souza and Rabbi David Wolpe. The audience in attendance at the debate were polled before and after the debate. Prior to the debate, 52% agreed with the motion, 26% were opposed and 22% were undecided. After the debate, 59% supported the claim that the world would be better off without religion, 31% opposed it, and 10% remained undecided. Since the increase in proponents was greater than that in opponents, Chapman and Grayling were declared the winners of the debate. [9]
In his closing summary of the debate, Matthew Chapman contrasted the social benefits of science and religion. He pointed out that scientific knowledge has lengthened human lifespans and eliminated diseases in only the past century while "religion has had thousands of years to prove its supernatural effectiveness" with no demonstrable results. If religion had a positive effect on human behavior, then "markers of social dysfunction...would be much lower in highly religious societies." Yet, he concluded, the exact opposite is true, with incarceration and teen pregnancy rates being much higher in the highly religious United States than they are in the more secular nations in Europe. [9]
The teleological argument also known as physico-theological argument, argument from design, or intelligent design argument, is a rational argument for the existence of God or, more generally, that complex functionality in the natural world, which looks designed, is evidence of an intelligent creator. The earliest recorded versions of this argument are associated with Socrates in ancient Greece, although it has been argued that he was taking up an older argument. Later, Plato and Aristotle developed complex approaches to the proposal that the cosmos has an intelligent cause, but it was the Stoics during the Roman era who, under their influence, "developed the battery of creationist arguments broadly known under the label 'The Argument from Design'".
Phillip E. Johnson was an American legal scholar who was the Jefferson E. Peyser Professor of Law at the University of California, Berkeley. He was an opponent of evolutionary science, co-founder of the Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture (CSC), and one of the co-founders of the intelligent design movement, along with William Dembski and Michael Behe. Johnson described himself as "in a sense the father of the intelligent design movement".
The history of creationism relates to the history of thought based on the premise that the natural universe had a beginning, and came into being supernaturally. The term creationism in its broad sense covers a wide range of views and interpretations, and was not in common use before the late 19th century. Throughout recorded history, many people have viewed the universe as a created entity. Many ancient historical accounts from around the world refer to or imply a creation of the earth and universe. Although specific historical understandings of creationism have used varying degrees of empirical, spiritual and/or philosophical investigations, they are all based on the view that the universe was created. The Genesis creation narrative has provided a basic framework for Jewish and Christian epistemological understandings of how the universe came into being – through the divine intervention of the god, Yahweh. Historically, literal interpretations of this narrative were more dominant than allegorical ones.
The intelligent design movement is a neo-creationist religious campaign for broad social, academic and political change to promote and support the pseudoscientific idea of intelligent design (ID), which asserts that "certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection." Its chief activities are a campaign to promote public awareness of this concept, the lobbying of policymakers to include its teaching in high school science classes, and legal action, either to defend such teaching or to remove barriers otherwise preventing it. The movement arose out of the creation science movement in the United States, and is driven by a small group of proponents. The Encyclopædia Britannica explains that ID cannot be empirically tested and that it fails to solve the problem of evil; thus, it is neither sound science nor sound theology.
Michael Escott Ruse was a British-born Canadian philosopher of science who specialised in the philosophy of biology and worked on the relationship between science and religion, the creation–evolution controversy, and the demarcation problem within science. Ruse began his career teaching at The University of Guelph and spent many years at Florida State University.
The "Teach the controversy" campaign of the Discovery Institute seeks to promote the pseudoscientific principle of intelligent design as part of its attempts to discredit the teaching of evolution in United States public high school science courses. Scientific organizations point out that the institute claims that there is a scientific controversy where in fact none exists.
John F. Haught is an American theologian. He is a Distinguished Research Professor at Georgetown University. He specializes in Roman Catholic systematic theology, with a particular interest in issues pertaining to physical cosmology, evolutionary biology, geology, and Christianity.
Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, 400 F. Supp. 2d 707 was the first case brought in the United States federal courts testing a public school policy requiring the teaching of intelligent design (ID). The court found intelligent design to be not science. In October 2004, the Dover Area School District of York County, Pennsylvania, changed its biology teaching curriculum to require that intelligent design be presented as an alternative to evolution theory, and that Of Pandas and People, a textbook advocating intelligent design, was to be used as a reference book. The prominence of this textbook during the trial was such that the case is sometimes referred to as the Dover Panda Trial, a name which recalls the popular name of the Scopes Monkey Trial in Tennessee, 80 years earlier. The plaintiffs successfully argued that intelligent design is a form of creationism, and that the school board policy violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. The judge's decision sparked considerable response from both supporters and critics.
Neo-creationism is a pseudoscientific movement which aims to restate creationism in terms more likely to be well received by the public, by policy makers, by educators and by the scientific community. It aims to re-frame the debate over the origins of life in non-religious terms and without appeals to scripture. This comes in response to the 1987 ruling by the United States Supreme Court in Edwards v. Aguillard that creationism is an inherently religious concept and that advocating it as correct or accurate in public-school curricula violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
"The Monkey Suit" is the twenty-first and penultimate episode of the seventeenth season of the American animated television series The Simpsons. It originally aired on the Fox network in the United States on May 14, 2006. In the episode, Ned Flanders is shocked after seeing a new display at the museum about evolution. Together with Reverend Lovejoy, he spreads the religious belief of creationism in Springfield, and at a later town meeting, teaching evolution is made illegal. As a result, Lisa decides to hold secret classes for people interested in evolution. However, she is quickly arrested and a trial against her is initiated.
Rejection of evolution by religious groups, sometimes called creation–evolution controversy, has a long history. In response to theories developed by scientists, some religious individuals and organizations question the legitimacy of scientific ideas that contradicted the young earth pseudoscientific interpretation of the creation account in Genesis.
The Trouble with Atheism is an hour-long documentary on atheism, presented by Rod Liddle. It was broadcast on Channel 4 in Britain in December 2006. The documentary focuses on criticising atheism for its perceived similarities to religion, as well as arrogance and intolerance. The programme includes interviews with a number of prominent scientists, including atheists Richard Dawkins and Peter Atkins and Anglican priest John Polkinghorne. It also includes an interview with Ellen Johnson, the president of American Atheists.
The Discovery Institute has conducted a series of related public relations campaigns which seek to promote intelligent design while attempting to discredit evolutionary biology, which the Institute terms "Darwinism". The Discovery Institute promotes the pseudoscientific intelligent design movement and is represented by Creative Response Concepts, a public relations firm.
This timeline of intelligent design outlines the major events in the development of intelligent design as presented and promoted by the intelligent design movement.
Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed is a 2008 American propaganda film directed by Nathan Frankowski and starring Ben Stein. It is presented as a documentary promoting the conspiracy theory that academia oppresses and excludes people who believe in intelligent design. It portrays the scientific theory of evolution as a contributor to communism, fascism, atheism, eugenics, and in particular Nazi atrocities in the Holocaust. Although intelligent design is a pseudoscientific religious idea, the film presents it as science-based, without giving a detailed definition of the concept or attempting to explain it on a scientific level. Other than briefly addressing issues of irreducible complexity, Expelled examines intelligent design purely as a political issue.
The Devil in Dover: An Insider's Story of Dogma v. Darwin in Small-Town America is a 2008 book by journalist Lauri Lebo about the Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District intelligent design trial, through her own perspective as a local reporter on the trial as she confronted her own attitudes about organized religion and her father who was a fundamentalist Christian.
40 Days and 40 Nights: Darwin, Intelligent Design, God, OxyContin, and Other Oddities on Trial in Pennsylvania is a 2007 non-fiction book about the Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District trial of 2005. Author Matthew Chapman, a journalist, screenwriter and director reported on the trial for Harper's magazine.
The Ledge is a 2011 American thriller drama film written and directed by Matthew Chapman, starring Charlie Hunnam, Terrence Howard, Liv Tyler, Christopher Gorham, and Patrick Wilson. It was released on July 8, 2011, being a box office bomb and panned by critics.
In American schools, the Genesis creation narrative was generally taught as the origin of the universe and of life until Darwin's scientific theories became widely accepted. While there was some immediate backlash, organized opposition did not get underway until the Fundamentalist–Modernist controversy broke out following World War I; several states passed laws banning the teaching of evolution while others debated them but did not pass them. The Scopes Trial was the result of a challenge to the law in Tennessee. Scopes lost his case, and further U.S. states passed laws banning the teaching of evolution.